2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py
|
|
|
|
; RUN: llc -mtriple=amdgcn -mcpu=gfx700 -verify-machineinstrs < %s | FileCheck -check-prefixes=GFX7 %s
|
|
|
|
; RUN: llc -mtriple=amdgcn -mcpu=gfx803 -verify-machineinstrs < %s | FileCheck -check-prefixes=GFX8 %s
|
|
|
|
; RUN: llc -mtriple=amdgcn -mcpu=gfx900 -verify-machineinstrs < %s | FileCheck -check-prefixes=GFX9 %s
|
2018-10-05 00:57:37 +08:00
|
|
|
; RUN: llc -mtriple=amdgcn -mcpu=gfx906 -verify-machineinstrs < %s | FileCheck -check-prefixes=GFX9-DL %s
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; RUN: llc -mtriple=amdgcn -mcpu=gfx1011 -verify-machineinstrs < %s | FileCheck -check-prefixes=GFX10-DL %s
|
|
|
|
; RUN: llc -mtriple=amdgcn -mcpu=gfx1012 -verify-machineinstrs < %s | FileCheck -check-prefixes=GFX10-DL %s
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @udot8_acc32(<8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src1,
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-LABEL: udot8_acc32:
|
|
|
|
; GFX7: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0xd
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s3, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s2, -1
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s6, s[6:7], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s4, s[4:5], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s20, s[0:1], 0x0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s7, s6, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s6, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s15, s6, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s16, s6, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s17, s6, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s18, s6, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s19, s6, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s6, s6, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s5, s4, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s8, s4, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s9, s4, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s4, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s11, s4, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s12, s4, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s13, s4, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s4, s4, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s6
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s20
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s4, v0, v1
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s19
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s13, v1, v0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s18
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s12, v1, v0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s17
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s11, v1, v0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s16
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s10, v1, v0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s15
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s9, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s14
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s8, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s7
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s5, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v0, off, s[0:3], 0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-LABEL: udot8_acc32:
|
|
|
|
; GFX8: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s6, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2020-01-14 06:54:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s2, s[4:5], 0x0
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s18, s[0:1], 0x0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s7, s6, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s12, s6, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s13, s6, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s6, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s15, s6, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s16, s6, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s17, s6, 0x40004
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_and_b32 s6, s6, 15
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s3, s2, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s4, s2, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s2, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s8, s2, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s9, s2, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s2, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s11, s2, 0x40004
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_and_b32 s2, s2, 15
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s6
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s18
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s2, v0, v1
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s17
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s11, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s16
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s10, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s9, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s14
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s8, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s13
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s5, v1, v0
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s12
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s4, v1, v0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s7
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s3, v1, v0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: flat_store_dword v[0:1], v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: udot8_acc32:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s6, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2020-01-14 06:54:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s2, s[4:5], 0x0
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s18, s[0:1], 0x0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s7, s6, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s12, s6, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s13, s6, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s6, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s15, s6, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s16, s6, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s17, s6, 0x40004
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_and_b32 s6, s6, 15
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s3, s2, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s4, s2, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s2, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s8, s2, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s9, s2, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s2, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s11, s2, 0x40004
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_and_b32 s2, s2, 15
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s6
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s18
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s2, v0, v1
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s17
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s11, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s16
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s10, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s9, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s14
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s8, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s13
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s5, v1, v0
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s12
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s4, v1, v0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s7
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s3, v1, v0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_dword v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
2018-10-05 00:57:37 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-LABEL: udot8_acc32:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s2, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s3, s[0:1], 0x0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s4, s[4:5], 0x0
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_dot8_u32_u4 v2, s4, v0, v1
|
2018-10-05 00:57:37 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: global_store_dword v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-LABEL: udot8_acc32:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
2020-05-01 23:43:12 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_clause 0x1
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[4:5], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s6, s[4:5], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[0:1], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[2:3], 0x0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s6
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_dot8_u32_u4 v2, s0, s1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s4
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s5
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: global_store_dword v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
<8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src2,
|
|
|
|
i32 addrspace(1)* nocapture %dst) {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%vec1 = load <8 x i4>, <8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src1
|
|
|
|
%vec2 = load <8 x i4>, <8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e0 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 0
|
|
|
|
%cv1e0 = zext i4 %v1e0 to i32
|
|
|
|
%v2e0 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 0
|
|
|
|
%cv2e0 = zext i4 %v2e0 to i32
|
|
|
|
%mul0 = mul nuw nsw i32 %cv1e0, %cv2e0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e1 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 1
|
|
|
|
%cv1e1 = zext i4 %v1e1 to i32
|
|
|
|
%v2e1 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 1
|
|
|
|
%cv2e1 = zext i4 %v2e1 to i32
|
|
|
|
%mul1 = mul nuw nsw i32 %cv1e1, %cv2e1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e2 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 2
|
|
|
|
%cv1e2 = zext i4 %v1e2 to i32
|
|
|
|
%v2e2 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 2
|
|
|
|
%cv2e2 = zext i4 %v2e2 to i32
|
|
|
|
%mul2 = mul nuw nsw i32 %cv1e2, %cv2e2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e3 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 3
|
|
|
|
%cv1e3 = zext i4 %v1e3 to i32
|
|
|
|
%v2e3 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 3
|
|
|
|
%cv2e3 = zext i4 %v2e3 to i32
|
|
|
|
%mul3 = mul nuw nsw i32 %cv1e3, %cv2e3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e4 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 4
|
|
|
|
%cv1e4 = zext i4 %v1e4 to i32
|
|
|
|
%v2e4 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 4
|
|
|
|
%cv2e4 = zext i4 %v2e4 to i32
|
|
|
|
%mul4 = mul nuw nsw i32 %cv1e4, %cv2e4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e5 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 5
|
|
|
|
%cv1e5 = zext i4 %v1e5 to i32
|
|
|
|
%v2e5 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 5
|
|
|
|
%cv2e5 = zext i4 %v2e5 to i32
|
|
|
|
%mul5 = mul nuw nsw i32 %cv1e5, %cv2e5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e6 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 6
|
|
|
|
%cv1e6 = zext i4 %v1e6 to i32
|
|
|
|
%v2e6 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 6
|
|
|
|
%cv2e6 = zext i4 %v2e6 to i32
|
|
|
|
%mul6 = mul nuw nsw i32 %cv1e6, %cv2e6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e7 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 7
|
|
|
|
%cv1e7 = zext i4 %v1e7 to i32
|
|
|
|
%v2e7 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 7
|
|
|
|
%cv2e7 = zext i4 %v2e7 to i32
|
|
|
|
%mul7 = mul nuw nsw i32 %cv1e7, %cv2e7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%acc = load i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %dst, align 4
|
|
|
|
%add1 = add i32 %mul0, %acc
|
|
|
|
%add2 = add i32 %add1, %mul1
|
|
|
|
%add3 = add i32 %add2, %mul2
|
|
|
|
%add4 = add i32 %add3, %mul3
|
|
|
|
%add5 = add i32 %add4, %mul4
|
|
|
|
%add6 = add i32 %add5, %mul5
|
|
|
|
%add7 = add i32 %add6, %mul6
|
|
|
|
%add8 = add i32 %add7, %mul7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
store i32 %add8, i32 addrspace(1)* %dst, align 4
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; TODO: Remove the unnecessary instruction(that is zero-extending the
|
|
|
|
; 2nd MAD) to have the pattern-recognizer to kick in.
|
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @udot8_acc16(<8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src1,
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-LABEL: udot8_acc16:
|
|
|
|
; GFX7: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0xd
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s3, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s2, -1
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: buffer_load_ushort v0, off, s[0:3], 0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s4, s[4:5], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s5, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s6, s4, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s5, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s15, s5, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s16, s5, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s17, s5, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s18, s5, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s19, s5, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s13, s5, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s5, s5, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s7, s4, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s8, s4, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s9, s4, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s4, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s11, s4, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s12, s4, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s4, s4, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s5
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s19
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s18
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, s17
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v5, s16
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v6, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v7, s14
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s4, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s12, v2, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s11, v3, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s10, v4, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s9, v5, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s8, v6, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s7, v7, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s13
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s6, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: buffer_store_short v0, off, s[0:3], 0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-LABEL: udot8_acc16:
|
|
|
|
; GFX8: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: flat_load_ushort v2, v[0:1]
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[4:5], 0x0
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s2, s0, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s1, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s11, s1, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s12, s1, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s13, s1, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s1, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s15, s1, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s9, s1, 28
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_and_b32 s1, s1, 15
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s0, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s4, s0, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s0, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s6, s0, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s7, s0, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s8, s0, 0x40004
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_and_b32 s0, s0, 15
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s1
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v5, s14
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v6, s13
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v7, s12
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v8, s11
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v9, s10
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s0, v3, v2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s8, v4, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, 0xffff, v2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s7, v5, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s6, v6, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s5, v7, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s4, v8, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s3, v9, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s9
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, v3, v2
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: flat_store_short v[0:1], v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: udot8_acc16:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_ushort v2, v[0:1], off
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[4:5], 0x0
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s2, s0, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s1, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s11, s1, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s12, s1, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s13, s1, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s1, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s15, s1, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s9, s1, 28
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_and_b32 s1, s1, 15
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s0, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s4, s0, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s0, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s6, s0, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s7, s0, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s8, s0, 0x40004
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_and_b32 s0, s0, 15
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s1
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v5, s14
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v6, s13
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v7, s12
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v8, s11
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v9, s10
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s0, v3, v2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s8, v4, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, 0xffff, v2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s7, v5, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s6, v6, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s5, v7, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s4, v8, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s3, v9, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s9
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, v3, v2
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_short v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
2018-10-05 00:57:37 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-LABEL: udot8_acc16:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: global_load_ushort v2, v[0:1], off
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[4:5], 0x0
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2018-10-05 00:57:37 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s2, s0, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s1, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s11, s1, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s12, s1, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s13, s1, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s1, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s15, s1, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s9, s1, 28
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_and_b32 s1, s1, 15
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s0, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s4, s0, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s0, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s6, s0, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s7, s0, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s8, s0, 0x40004
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_and_b32 s0, s0, 15
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s1
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v5, s14
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v6, s13
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v7, s12
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v8, s11
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v9, s10
|
2018-10-05 00:57:37 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s0, v3, v2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s8, v4, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, 0xffff, v2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s7, v5, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s6, v6, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s5, v7, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s4, v8, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s3, v9, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s9
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, v3, v2
|
2018-10-05 00:57:37 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: global_store_short v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-LABEL: udot8_acc16:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[2:3], s[0:1], 0x34
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s2
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-01-14 06:54:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: global_load_ushort v2, v[0:1], off
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[0:1], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[2:3], 0x0
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_and_b32 s2, s0, 15
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_and_b32 s3, s1, 15
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, s3, v2
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s0, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s1, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, s3, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s0, 0x40008
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s1, 0x40008
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, 0xffff, v2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, s3, v2
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s0, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s1, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, s3, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s0, 0x40010
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s1, 0x40010
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, s3, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s0, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s1, 0x40014
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, s3, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s0, 0x40018
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s1, 0x40018
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s0, s0, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s1, s1, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, s3, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s0, s1, v2
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: global_store_short v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
<8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src2,
|
|
|
|
i16 addrspace(1)* nocapture %dst) {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%vec1 = load <8 x i4>, <8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src1
|
|
|
|
%vec2 = load <8 x i4>, <8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e0 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 0
|
|
|
|
%cv1e0 = zext i4 %v1e0 to i16
|
|
|
|
%v2e0 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 0
|
|
|
|
%cv2e0 = zext i4 %v2e0 to i16
|
|
|
|
%mul0 = mul nuw nsw i16 %cv1e0, %cv2e0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e1 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 1
|
|
|
|
%cv1e1 = zext i4 %v1e1 to i16
|
|
|
|
%v2e1 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 1
|
|
|
|
%cv2e1 = zext i4 %v2e1 to i16
|
|
|
|
%mul1 = mul nuw nsw i16 %cv1e1, %cv2e1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e2 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 2
|
|
|
|
%cv1e2 = zext i4 %v1e2 to i16
|
|
|
|
%v2e2 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 2
|
|
|
|
%cv2e2 = zext i4 %v2e2 to i16
|
|
|
|
%mul2 = mul nuw nsw i16 %cv1e2, %cv2e2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e3 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 3
|
|
|
|
%cv1e3 = zext i4 %v1e3 to i16
|
|
|
|
%v2e3 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 3
|
|
|
|
%cv2e3 = zext i4 %v2e3 to i16
|
|
|
|
%mul3 = mul nuw nsw i16 %cv1e3, %cv2e3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e4 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 4
|
|
|
|
%cv1e4 = zext i4 %v1e4 to i16
|
|
|
|
%v2e4 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 4
|
|
|
|
%cv2e4 = zext i4 %v2e4 to i16
|
|
|
|
%mul4 = mul nuw nsw i16 %cv1e4, %cv2e4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e5 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 5
|
|
|
|
%cv1e5 = zext i4 %v1e5 to i16
|
|
|
|
%v2e5 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 5
|
|
|
|
%cv2e5 = zext i4 %v2e5 to i16
|
|
|
|
%mul5 = mul nuw nsw i16 %cv1e5, %cv2e5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e6 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 6
|
|
|
|
%cv1e6 = zext i4 %v1e6 to i16
|
|
|
|
%v2e6 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 6
|
|
|
|
%cv2e6 = zext i4 %v2e6 to i16
|
|
|
|
%mul6 = mul nuw nsw i16 %cv1e6, %cv2e6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e7 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 7
|
|
|
|
%cv1e7 = zext i4 %v1e7 to i16
|
|
|
|
%v2e7 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 7
|
|
|
|
%cv2e7 = zext i4 %v2e7 to i16
|
|
|
|
%mul7 = mul nuw nsw i16 %cv1e7, %cv2e7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%acc = load i16, i16 addrspace(1)* %dst, align 4
|
|
|
|
%add1 = add i16 %mul0, %acc
|
|
|
|
%add2 = add i16 %add1, %mul1
|
|
|
|
%add3 = add i16 %add2, %mul2
|
|
|
|
%add4 = add i16 %add3, %mul3
|
|
|
|
%add5 = add i16 %add4, %mul4
|
|
|
|
%add6 = add i16 %add5, %mul5
|
|
|
|
%add7 = add i16 %add6, %mul6
|
|
|
|
%add8 = add i16 %add7, %mul7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
store i16 %add8, i16 addrspace(1)* %dst, align 4
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; TODO: Remove the unnecessary instruction(that is zero-extending the
|
|
|
|
; 2nd MAD) to have the pattern-recognizer to kick in.
|
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @udot8_acc8(<8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src1,
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-LABEL: udot8_acc8:
|
|
|
|
; GFX7: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0xd
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s3, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s2, -1
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: buffer_load_ubyte v0, off, s[0:3], 0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s4, s[4:5], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s5, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s6, s4, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s5, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s15, s5, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s16, s5, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s17, s5, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s18, s5, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s19, s5, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s13, s5, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s5, s5, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s7, s4, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s8, s4, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s9, s4, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s4, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s11, s4, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s12, s4, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s4, s4, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s5
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s19
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s18
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, s17
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v5, s16
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v6, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v7, s14
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s4, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s12, v2, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s11, v3, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s10, v4, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s9, v5, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s8, v6, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s7, v7, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s13
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s6, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: buffer_store_byte v0, off, s[0:3], 0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-LABEL: udot8_acc8:
|
|
|
|
; GFX8: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: flat_load_ubyte v2, v[0:1]
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[4:5], 0x0
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s2, s0, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s1, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s11, s1, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s12, s1, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s13, s1, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s1, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s15, s1, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s9, s1, 28
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_and_b32 s1, s1, 15
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s0, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s4, s0, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s0, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s6, s0, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s7, s0, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s8, s0, 0x40004
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_and_b32 s0, s0, 15
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s1
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v5, s14
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v6, s13
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v7, s12
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v8, s11
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v9, s10
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s0, v3, v2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s8, v4, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, 0xff, v2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s7, v5, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s6, v6, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s5, v7, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s4, v8, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s3, v9, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s9
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, v3, v2
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: flat_store_byte v[0:1], v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: udot8_acc8:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_ubyte v2, v[0:1], off
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[4:5], 0x0
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s2, s0, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s1, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s11, s1, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s12, s1, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s13, s1, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s1, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s15, s1, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s9, s1, 28
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_and_b32 s1, s1, 15
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s0, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s4, s0, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s0, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s6, s0, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s7, s0, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s8, s0, 0x40004
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_and_b32 s0, s0, 15
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s1
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v5, s14
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v6, s13
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v7, s12
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v8, s11
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v9, s10
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s0, v3, v2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s8, v4, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, 0xff, v2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s7, v5, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s6, v6, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s5, v7, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s4, v8, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s3, v9, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s9
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, v3, v2
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_byte v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
2018-10-05 00:57:37 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-LABEL: udot8_acc8:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: global_load_ubyte v2, v[0:1], off
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[4:5], 0x0
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2018-10-05 00:57:37 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s2, s0, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s1, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s11, s1, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s12, s1, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s13, s1, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s1, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s15, s1, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s9, s1, 28
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_and_b32 s1, s1, 15
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s0, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s4, s0, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s0, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s6, s0, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s7, s0, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s8, s0, 0x40004
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_and_b32 s0, s0, 15
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s1
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v5, s14
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v6, s13
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v7, s12
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v8, s11
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v9, s10
|
2018-10-05 00:57:37 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s0, v3, v2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s8, v4, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, 0xff, v2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s7, v5, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s6, v6, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s5, v7, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s4, v8, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s3, v9, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s9
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, v3, v2
|
2018-10-05 00:57:37 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: global_store_byte v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-LABEL: udot8_acc8:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[2:3], s[0:1], 0x34
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s2
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-01-14 06:54:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: global_load_ubyte v2, v[0:1], off
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[0:1], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[2:3], 0x0
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_and_b32 s2, s0, 15
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_and_b32 s3, s1, 15
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, s3, v2
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s0, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s1, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, s3, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s0, 0x40008
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s1, 0x40008
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, 0xff, v2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, s3, v2
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s0, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s1, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, s3, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s0, 0x40010
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s1, 0x40010
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, s3, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s0, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s1, 0x40014
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, s3, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s0, 0x40018
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s1, 0x40018
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s0, s0, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s1, s1, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, s3, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s0, s1, v2
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: global_store_byte v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
<8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src2,
|
|
|
|
i8 addrspace(1)* nocapture %dst) {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%vec1 = load <8 x i4>, <8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src1
|
|
|
|
%vec2 = load <8 x i4>, <8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e0 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 0
|
|
|
|
%cv1e0 = zext i4 %v1e0 to i8
|
|
|
|
%v2e0 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 0
|
|
|
|
%cv2e0 = zext i4 %v2e0 to i8
|
|
|
|
%mul0 = mul nuw nsw i8 %cv1e0, %cv2e0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e1 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 1
|
|
|
|
%cv1e1 = zext i4 %v1e1 to i8
|
|
|
|
%v2e1 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 1
|
|
|
|
%cv2e1 = zext i4 %v2e1 to i8
|
|
|
|
%mul1 = mul nuw nsw i8 %cv1e1, %cv2e1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e2 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 2
|
|
|
|
%cv1e2 = zext i4 %v1e2 to i8
|
|
|
|
%v2e2 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 2
|
|
|
|
%cv2e2 = zext i4 %v2e2 to i8
|
|
|
|
%mul2 = mul nuw nsw i8 %cv1e2, %cv2e2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e3 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 3
|
|
|
|
%cv1e3 = zext i4 %v1e3 to i8
|
|
|
|
%v2e3 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 3
|
|
|
|
%cv2e3 = zext i4 %v2e3 to i8
|
|
|
|
%mul3 = mul nuw nsw i8 %cv1e3, %cv2e3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e4 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 4
|
|
|
|
%cv1e4 = zext i4 %v1e4 to i8
|
|
|
|
%v2e4 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 4
|
|
|
|
%cv2e4 = zext i4 %v2e4 to i8
|
|
|
|
%mul4 = mul nuw nsw i8 %cv1e4, %cv2e4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e5 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 5
|
|
|
|
%cv1e5 = zext i4 %v1e5 to i8
|
|
|
|
%v2e5 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 5
|
|
|
|
%cv2e5 = zext i4 %v2e5 to i8
|
|
|
|
%mul5 = mul nuw nsw i8 %cv1e5, %cv2e5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e6 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 6
|
|
|
|
%cv1e6 = zext i4 %v1e6 to i8
|
|
|
|
%v2e6 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 6
|
|
|
|
%cv2e6 = zext i4 %v2e6 to i8
|
|
|
|
%mul6 = mul nuw nsw i8 %cv1e6, %cv2e6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e7 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 7
|
|
|
|
%cv1e7 = zext i4 %v1e7 to i8
|
|
|
|
%v2e7 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 7
|
|
|
|
%cv2e7 = zext i4 %v2e7 to i8
|
|
|
|
%mul7 = mul nuw nsw i8 %cv1e7, %cv2e7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%acc = load i8, i8 addrspace(1)* %dst, align 4
|
|
|
|
%add1 = add i8 %mul0, %acc
|
|
|
|
%add2 = add i8 %add1, %mul1
|
|
|
|
%add3 = add i8 %add2, %mul2
|
|
|
|
%add4 = add i8 %add3, %mul3
|
|
|
|
%add5 = add i8 %add4, %mul4
|
|
|
|
%add6 = add i8 %add5, %mul5
|
|
|
|
%add7 = add i8 %add6, %mul6
|
|
|
|
%add8 = add i8 %add7, %mul7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
store i8 %add8, i8 addrspace(1)* %dst, align 4
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; TODO: Remove the two unnecessary instructions(and+add after 2nd MAD)
|
|
|
|
; to have the pattern-recognizer to kick in.
|
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @udot8_acc4(<8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src1,
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-LABEL: udot8_acc4:
|
|
|
|
; GFX7: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0xd
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s3, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s2, -1
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: buffer_load_ubyte v0, off, s[0:3], 0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s4, s[4:5], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s5, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s6, s4, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s5, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s15, s5, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s16, s5, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s17, s5, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s18, s5, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s19, s5, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s13, s5, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s5, s5, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s7, s4, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s8, s4, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s9, s4, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s4, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s11, s4, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s12, s4, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s4, s4, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s5
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s19
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s18
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, s17
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v5, s16
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v6, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v7, s14
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s4, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s12, v2, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s11, v3, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s10, v4, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s9, v5, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s8, v6, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s7, v7, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s13
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s6, v1, v0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v0, 15, v0
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: buffer_store_byte v0, off, s[0:3], 0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-LABEL: udot8_acc4:
|
|
|
|
; GFX8: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: flat_load_ubyte v2, v[0:1]
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[4:5], 0x0
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_and_b32 s8, s0, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_and_b32 s15, s1, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s1, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s1, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s11, s1, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s12, s1, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s13, s1, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s9, s1, 28
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s1, s1, 0x4000c
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s7, s0, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v5, s14
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s2, s0, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s0, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s4, s0, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s0, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s6, s0, 0x40008
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s0, s0, 0x4000c
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s1
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v6, s13
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mul_u32_u24_e32 v3, s0, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v3, 15, v3
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v7, s12
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v8, s11
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v9, s10
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s8, v4, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s7, v5, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s6, v6, v2
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, 15, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, vcc, v3, v2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s5, v7, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s4, v8, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s3, v9, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s9
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, v3, v2
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, 15, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: flat_store_byte v[0:1], v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: udot8_acc4:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_ubyte v2, v[0:1], off
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[4:5], 0x0
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_and_b32 s8, s0, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_and_b32 s15, s1, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s1, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s1, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s11, s1, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s12, s1, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s13, s1, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s9, s1, 28
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s1, s1, 0x4000c
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s7, s0, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v5, s14
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s2, s0, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s0, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s4, s0, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s0, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s6, s0, 0x40008
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s0, s0, 0x4000c
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s1
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v6, s13
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mul_u32_u24_e32 v3, s0, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v3, 15, v3
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v7, s12
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v8, s11
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v9, s10
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s8, v4, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s7, v5, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s6, v6, v2
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, 15, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, v2, v3
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s5, v7, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s4, v8, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s3, v9, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s9
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, v3, v2
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, 15, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_byte v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
2018-10-05 00:57:37 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-LABEL: udot8_acc4:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: global_load_ubyte v2, v[0:1], off
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[4:5], 0x0
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2018-10-05 00:57:37 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_and_b32 s8, s0, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_and_b32 s15, s1, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s1, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s1, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s11, s1, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s12, s1, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s13, s1, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s9, s1, 28
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s1, s1, 0x4000c
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s7, s0, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v5, s14
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s2, s0, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s0, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s4, s0, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s0, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s6, s0, 0x40008
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s0, s0, 0x4000c
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s1
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v6, s13
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mul_u32_u24_e32 v3, s0, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v3, 15, v3
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v7, s12
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v8, s11
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v9, s10
|
2019-07-23 20:39:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s8, v4, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s7, v5, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s6, v6, v2
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, 15, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, v2, v3
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s5, v7, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s4, v8, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s3, v9, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s9
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, v3, v2
|
2018-10-05 00:57:37 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, 15, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: global_store_byte v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-LABEL: udot8_acc4:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[2:3], s[0:1], 0x34
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s2
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-01-14 06:54:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: global_load_ubyte v2, v[0:1], off
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[0:1], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[2:3], 0x0
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_and_b32 s2, s0, 15
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_and_b32 s3, s1, 15
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s4, s1, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s1, 0x4000c
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, s3, v2
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s0, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s1, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, s3, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s0, 0x40008
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s0, 0x4000c
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mul_u32_u24_e64 v3, s3, s5
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, s4, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s0, 0x40010
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s1, 0x40010
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v3, 15, v3
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, 15, v2
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_e32 v2, v2, v3
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, s3, v2
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s0, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s1, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, s3, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s0, 0x40018
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s1, 0x40018
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s0, s0, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s1, s1, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, s3, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s0, s1, v2
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, 15, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: global_store_byte v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
<8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src2,
|
|
|
|
i4 addrspace(1)* nocapture %dst) {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%vec1 = load <8 x i4>, <8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src1
|
|
|
|
%vec2 = load <8 x i4>, <8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e0 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 0
|
|
|
|
%v2e0 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 0
|
|
|
|
%mul0 = mul nuw nsw i4 %v1e0, %v2e0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e1 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 1
|
|
|
|
%v2e1 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 1
|
|
|
|
%mul1 = mul nuw nsw i4 %v1e1, %v2e1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e2 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 2
|
|
|
|
%v2e2 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 2
|
|
|
|
%mul2 = mul nuw nsw i4 %v1e2, %v2e2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e3 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 3
|
|
|
|
%v2e3 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 3
|
|
|
|
%mul3 = mul nuw nsw i4 %v1e3, %v2e3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e4 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 4
|
|
|
|
%v2e4 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 4
|
|
|
|
%mul4 = mul nuw nsw i4 %v1e4, %v2e4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e5 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 5
|
|
|
|
%v2e5 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 5
|
|
|
|
%mul5 = mul nuw nsw i4 %v1e5, %v2e5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e6 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 6
|
|
|
|
%v2e6 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 6
|
|
|
|
%mul6 = mul nuw nsw i4 %v1e6, %v2e6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e7 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 7
|
|
|
|
%v2e7 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 7
|
|
|
|
%mul7 = mul nuw nsw i4 %v1e7, %v2e7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%acc = load i4, i4 addrspace(1)* %dst, align 4
|
|
|
|
%add1 = add i4 %mul0, %acc
|
|
|
|
%add2 = add i4 %add1, %mul1
|
|
|
|
%add3 = add i4 %add2, %mul2
|
|
|
|
%add4 = add i4 %add3, %mul3
|
|
|
|
%add5 = add i4 %add4, %mul4
|
|
|
|
%add6 = add i4 %add5, %mul5
|
|
|
|
%add7 = add i4 %add6, %mul6
|
|
|
|
%add8 = add i4 %add7, %mul7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
store i4 %add8, i4 addrspace(1)* %dst, align 4
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; TODO: Currently, permutation of udot8 is turned off due to a huge increase
|
|
|
|
; in the compile time.
|
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @udot8_CommutationInsideMAD(<8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src1,
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-LABEL: udot8_CommutationInsideMAD:
|
|
|
|
; GFX7: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0xd
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s3, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s2, -1
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: buffer_load_ubyte v0, off, s[0:3], 0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s4, s[4:5], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s5, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s6, s4, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s5, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s15, s5, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s16, s5, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s17, s5, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s18, s5, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s19, s5, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s13, s5, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s5, s5, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s7, s4, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s8, s4, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s9, s4, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s4, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s11, s4, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s12, s4, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s4, s4, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s5
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s19
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s18
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, s17
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v5, s16
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v6, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v7, s14
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s4, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s12, v2, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s11, v3, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s10, v4, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s9, v5, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s8, v6, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s7, v7, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s13
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s6, v1, v0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v0, 15, v0
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: buffer_store_byte v0, off, s[0:3], 0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-LABEL: udot8_CommutationInsideMAD:
|
|
|
|
; GFX8: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: flat_load_ubyte v2, v[0:1]
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[4:5], 0x0
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_and_b32 s8, s0, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_and_b32 s15, s1, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s1, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s1, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s11, s1, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s12, s1, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s13, s1, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s9, s1, 28
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s1, s1, 0x4000c
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s7, s0, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v5, s14
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s2, s0, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s0, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s4, s0, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s0, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s6, s0, 0x40008
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s0, s0, 0x4000c
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s1
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v6, s13
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mul_u32_u24_e32 v3, s0, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v3, 15, v3
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v7, s12
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v8, s11
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v9, s10
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s8, v4, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s7, v5, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s6, v6, v2
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, 15, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, vcc, v2, v3
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s5, v7, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s4, v8, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s3, v9, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s9
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, v3, v2
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, 15, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: flat_store_byte v[0:1], v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: udot8_CommutationInsideMAD:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_ubyte v2, v[0:1], off
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[4:5], 0x0
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_and_b32 s8, s0, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_and_b32 s15, s1, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s1, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s1, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s11, s1, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s12, s1, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s13, s1, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s9, s1, 28
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s1, s1, 0x4000c
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s7, s0, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v5, s14
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s2, s0, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s0, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s4, s0, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s0, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s6, s0, 0x40008
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s0, s0, 0x4000c
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s1
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v6, s13
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mul_u32_u24_e32 v3, s0, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v3, 15, v3
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v7, s12
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v8, s11
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v9, s10
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s8, v4, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s7, v5, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s6, v6, v2
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, 15, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, v3, v2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s5, v7, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s4, v8, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s3, v9, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s9
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, v3, v2
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, 15, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_byte v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
2018-10-05 00:57:37 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-LABEL: udot8_CommutationInsideMAD:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: global_load_ubyte v2, v[0:1], off
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[4:5], 0x0
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2018-10-05 00:57:37 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_and_b32 s8, s0, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_and_b32 s15, s1, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s1, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s1, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s11, s1, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s12, s1, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s13, s1, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s9, s1, 28
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s1, s1, 0x4000c
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s7, s0, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v5, s14
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s2, s0, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s0, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s4, s0, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s0, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s6, s0, 0x40008
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s0, s0, 0x4000c
|
2018-10-05 00:57:37 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s1
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v6, s13
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mul_u32_u24_e32 v3, s0, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v3, 15, v3
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v7, s12
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v8, s11
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v9, s10
|
2018-10-05 00:57:37 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s8, v4, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s7, v5, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s6, v6, v2
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, 15, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, v3, v2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s5, v7, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s4, v8, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s3, v9, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s9
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, v3, v2
|
2018-10-05 00:57:37 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, 15, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: global_store_byte v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-LABEL: udot8_CommutationInsideMAD:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[2:3], s[0:1], 0x34
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s2
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-01-14 06:54:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: global_load_ubyte v2, v[0:1], off
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[0:1], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[2:3], 0x0
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_and_b32 s2, s0, 15
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_and_b32 s3, s1, 15
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s4, s0, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s1, 0x40008
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, s3, v2
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s0, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s1, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, s3, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s0, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s1, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mul_u32_u24_e64 v3, s2, s3
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s4, s5, v2
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s0, 0x40010
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s1, 0x40010
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v3, 15, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, 15, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_e32 v2, v3, v2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, s3, v2
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s0, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s1, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, s3, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s0, 0x40018
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s1, 0x40018
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s0, s0, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s1, s1, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, s3, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s0, s1, v2
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, 15, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: global_store_byte v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
<8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src2,
|
|
|
|
i4 addrspace(1)* nocapture %dst) {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%vec1 = load <8 x i4>, <8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src1
|
|
|
|
%vec2 = load <8 x i4>, <8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e0 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 0
|
|
|
|
%v2e0 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 0
|
|
|
|
%mul0 = mul nuw nsw i4 %v1e0, %v2e0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e1 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 1
|
|
|
|
%v2e1 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 1
|
|
|
|
%mul1 = mul nuw nsw i4 %v1e1, %v2e1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e2 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 2
|
|
|
|
%v2e2 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 2
|
|
|
|
%mul2 = mul nuw nsw i4 %v1e2, %v2e2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e3 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 3
|
|
|
|
%v2e3 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 3
|
|
|
|
%mul3 = mul nuw nsw i4 %v1e3, %v2e3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e4 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 4
|
|
|
|
%v2e4 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 4
|
|
|
|
%mul4 = mul nuw nsw i4 %v1e4, %v2e4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e5 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 5
|
|
|
|
%v2e5 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 5
|
|
|
|
%mul5 = mul nuw nsw i4 %v1e5, %v2e5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e6 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 6
|
|
|
|
%v2e6 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 6
|
|
|
|
%mul6 = mul nuw nsw i4 %v1e6, %v2e6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e7 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 7
|
|
|
|
%v2e7 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 7
|
|
|
|
%mul7 = mul nuw nsw i4 %v1e7, %v2e7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%acc = load i4, i4 addrspace(1)* %dst, align 4
|
|
|
|
%add1 = add i4 %mul0, %acc
|
|
|
|
%add2 = add i4 %mul1, %add1
|
|
|
|
%add3 = add i4 %mul2, %add2
|
|
|
|
%add4 = add i4 %mul3, %add3
|
|
|
|
%add5 = add i4 %mul4, %add4
|
|
|
|
%add6 = add i4 %mul5, %add5
|
|
|
|
%add7 = add i4 %mul6, %add6
|
|
|
|
%add8 = add i4 %mul7, %add7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
store i4 %add8, i4 addrspace(1)* %dst, align 4
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @udot8_multiuses_mul1(<8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src1,
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-LABEL: udot8_multiuses_mul1:
|
|
|
|
; GFX7: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0xd
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s3, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s2, -1
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s6, s[6:7], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s4, s[4:5], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s20, s[0:1], 0x0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s19, s6, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s7, s6, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s6, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s15, s6, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s16, s6, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s17, s6, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s18, s6, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s6, s6, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s5, s4, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s8, s4, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s9, s4, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s4, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s11, s4, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s12, s4, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s13, s4, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s4, s4, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s6
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s20
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v1, s4, v0, v1
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s19
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s4, v0, v1
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v1, s13, v2, v1
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s18
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v1, s12, v2, v1
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s17
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v1, s11, v2, v1
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s16
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v1, s10, v2, v1
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s15
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v1, s9, v2, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s14
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v1, s8, v2, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s7
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v1, s5, v2, v1
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v0, vcc, v1, v0
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v0, off, s[0:3], 0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-LABEL: udot8_multiuses_mul1:
|
|
|
|
; GFX8: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s6, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2020-01-14 06:54:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s2, s[4:5], 0x0
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s18, s[0:1], 0x0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s17, s6, 0x40004
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s7, s6, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s12, s6, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s13, s6, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s6, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s15, s6, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s16, s6, 0x40008
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_and_b32 s6, s6, 15
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s3, s2, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s4, s2, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s2, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s8, s2, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s9, s2, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s2, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s11, s2, 0x40004
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_and_b32 s2, s2, 15
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s6
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s18
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v1, s2, v0, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s17
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s2, v0, v1
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v1, s11, v2, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s16
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v1, s10, v2, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v1, s9, v2, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s14
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v1, s8, v2, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s13
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v1, s5, v2, v1
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s12
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v1, s4, v2, v1
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s7
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v1, s3, v2, v1
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, vcc, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: flat_store_dword v[0:1], v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: udot8_multiuses_mul1:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s6, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2020-01-14 06:54:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s2, s[4:5], 0x0
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s18, s[0:1], 0x0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s17, s6, 0x40004
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s7, s6, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s12, s6, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s13, s6, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s6, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s15, s6, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s16, s6, 0x40008
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_and_b32 s6, s6, 15
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s3, s2, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s4, s2, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s2, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s8, s2, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s9, s2, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s2, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s11, s2, 0x40004
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_and_b32 s2, s2, 15
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s6
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s18
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v1, s2, v0, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s17
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s2, v0, v1
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v1, s11, v2, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s16
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v1, s10, v2, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v1, s9, v2, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s14
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v1, s8, v2, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s13
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v1, s5, v2, v1
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s12
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v1, s4, v2, v1
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s7
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v1, s3, v2, v1
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, v0, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_dword v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
2018-10-05 00:57:37 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-LABEL: udot8_multiuses_mul1:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s6, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2020-01-14 06:54:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s2, s[4:5], 0x0
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s18, s[0:1], 0x0
|
2018-10-05 00:57:37 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s17, s6, 0x40004
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s7, s6, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s12, s6, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s13, s6, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s6, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s15, s6, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s16, s6, 0x40008
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_and_b32 s6, s6, 15
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s3, s2, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s4, s2, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s2, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s8, s2, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s9, s2, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s2, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s11, s2, 0x40004
|
2018-10-05 00:57:37 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_and_b32 s2, s2, 15
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s6
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s18
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v1, s2, v0, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s17
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s2, v0, v1
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v1, s11, v2, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s16
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v1, s10, v2, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v1, s9, v2, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s14
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v1, s8, v2, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s13
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v1, s5, v2, v1
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s12
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v1, s4, v2, v1
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s7
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v1, s3, v2, v1
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, v0, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
2018-10-05 00:57:37 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: global_store_dword v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-LABEL: udot8_multiuses_mul1:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
2020-05-01 23:43:12 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_clause 0x1
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[4:5], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s6, s[4:5], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[0:1], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[2:3], 0x0
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s6
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_and_b32 s2, s0, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_and_b32 s3, s1, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s6, s0, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s7, s1, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s2, s3, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v1, s6, s7, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s6, s0, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s7, s1, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s2, s3, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v1, s6, s7, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s6, s0, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s7, s1, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v1, s6, s7, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s6, s0, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s7, s1, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v1, s6, s7, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s6, s0, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s7, s1, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v1, s6, s7, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s6, s0, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s7, s1, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s0, s0, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s1, s1, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v1, s6, s7, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v1, s0, s1, v1
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_e32 v2, v0, v1
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s4
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s5
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: global_store_dword v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
<8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src2,
|
|
|
|
i32 addrspace(1)* nocapture %dst) {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%vec1 = load <8 x i4>, <8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src1
|
|
|
|
%vec2 = load <8 x i4>, <8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e0 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 0
|
|
|
|
%cv1e0 = zext i4 %v1e0 to i32
|
|
|
|
%v2e0 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 0
|
|
|
|
%cv2e0 = zext i4 %v2e0 to i32
|
|
|
|
%mul0 = mul nuw nsw i32 %cv1e0, %cv2e0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e1 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 1
|
|
|
|
%cv1e1 = zext i4 %v1e1 to i32
|
|
|
|
%v2e1 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 1
|
|
|
|
%cv2e1 = zext i4 %v2e1 to i32
|
|
|
|
%mul1 = mul nuw nsw i32 %cv1e1, %cv2e1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e2 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 2
|
|
|
|
%cv1e2 = zext i4 %v1e2 to i32
|
|
|
|
%v2e2 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 2
|
|
|
|
%cv2e2 = zext i4 %v2e2 to i32
|
|
|
|
%mul2 = mul nuw nsw i32 %cv1e2, %cv2e2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e3 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 3
|
|
|
|
%cv1e3 = zext i4 %v1e3 to i32
|
|
|
|
%v2e3 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 3
|
|
|
|
%cv2e3 = zext i4 %v2e3 to i32
|
|
|
|
%mul3 = mul nuw nsw i32 %cv1e3, %cv2e3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e4 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 4
|
|
|
|
%cv1e4 = zext i4 %v1e4 to i32
|
|
|
|
%v2e4 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 4
|
|
|
|
%cv2e4 = zext i4 %v2e4 to i32
|
|
|
|
%mul4 = mul nuw nsw i32 %cv1e4, %cv2e4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e5 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 5
|
|
|
|
%cv1e5 = zext i4 %v1e5 to i32
|
|
|
|
%v2e5 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 5
|
|
|
|
%cv2e5 = zext i4 %v2e5 to i32
|
|
|
|
%mul5 = mul nuw nsw i32 %cv1e5, %cv2e5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e6 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 6
|
|
|
|
%cv1e6 = zext i4 %v1e6 to i32
|
|
|
|
%v2e6 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 6
|
|
|
|
%cv2e6 = zext i4 %v2e6 to i32
|
|
|
|
%mul6 = mul nuw nsw i32 %cv1e6, %cv2e6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%v1e7 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec1, i64 7
|
|
|
|
%cv1e7 = zext i4 %v1e7 to i32
|
|
|
|
%v2e7 = extractelement <8 x i4> %vec2, i64 7
|
|
|
|
%cv2e7 = zext i4 %v2e7 to i32
|
|
|
|
%mul7 = mul nuw nsw i32 %cv1e7, %cv2e7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%acc = load i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %dst, align 4
|
|
|
|
%add1 = add i32 %mul0, %acc
|
|
|
|
%add = add i32 %mul0, %add1
|
|
|
|
%add2 = add i32 %add1, %mul1
|
|
|
|
%add3 = add i32 %add2, %mul2
|
|
|
|
%add4 = add i32 %add3, %mul3
|
|
|
|
%add5 = add i32 %add4, %mul4
|
|
|
|
%add6 = add i32 %add5, %mul5
|
|
|
|
%add7 = add i32 %add6, %mul6
|
|
|
|
%add8 = add i32 %add7, %mul7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%res = add i32 %add, %add8
|
|
|
|
store i32 %res, i32 addrspace(1)* %dst, align 4
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @udot8_acc32_vecMul(<8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src1,
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-LABEL: udot8_acc32_vecMul:
|
|
|
|
; GFX7: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0xd
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s3, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s2, -1
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s6, s[6:7], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s4, s[4:5], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s20, s[0:1], 0x0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s7, s6, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s6, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s15, s6, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s16, s6, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s17, s6, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s18, s6, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s19, s6, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s6, s6, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s5, s4, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s8, s4, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s9, s4, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s4, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s11, s4, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s12, s4, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s13, s4, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s4, s4, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s6
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s20
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s4, v0, v1
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s19
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s13, v1, v0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s18
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s12, v1, v0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s17
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s11, v1, v0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s16
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s10, v1, v0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s15
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s9, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s14
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s8, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s7
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s5, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v0, off, s[0:3], 0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-LABEL: udot8_acc32_vecMul:
|
|
|
|
; GFX8: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s6, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2020-01-14 06:54:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s2, s[4:5], 0x0
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s18, s[0:1], 0x0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s7, s6, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s12, s6, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s13, s6, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s6, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s15, s6, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s16, s6, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s17, s6, 0x40004
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_and_b32 s6, s6, 15
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s3, s2, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s4, s2, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s2, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s8, s2, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s9, s2, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s2, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s11, s2, 0x40004
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_and_b32 s2, s2, 15
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s6
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s18
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s2, v0, v1
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s17
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s11, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s16
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s10, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s9, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s14
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s8, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s13
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s5, v1, v0
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s12
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s4, v1, v0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s7
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s3, v1, v0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: flat_store_dword v[0:1], v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: udot8_acc32_vecMul:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s6, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2020-01-14 06:54:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s2, s[4:5], 0x0
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s18, s[0:1], 0x0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s7, s6, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s12, s6, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s13, s6, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s6, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s15, s6, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s16, s6, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s17, s6, 0x40004
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_and_b32 s6, s6, 15
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s3, s2, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s4, s2, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s2, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s8, s2, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s9, s2, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s2, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s11, s2, 0x40004
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_and_b32 s2, s2, 15
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s6
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s18
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s2, v0, v1
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s17
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s11, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s16
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s10, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s9, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s14
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s8, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s13
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s5, v1, v0
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s12
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s4, v1, v0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s7
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s3, v1, v0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_dword v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
2018-10-05 00:57:37 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-LABEL: udot8_acc32_vecMul:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s2, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s3, s[0:1], 0x0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s4, s[4:5], 0x0
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_dot8_u32_u4 v2, s4, v0, v1
|
2018-10-05 00:57:37 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: global_store_dword v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-LABEL: udot8_acc32_vecMul:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
2020-05-01 23:43:12 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_clause 0x1
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[4:5], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s6, s[4:5], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[0:1], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[2:3], 0x0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s6
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_dot8_u32_u4 v2, s0, s1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s4
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s5
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: global_store_dword v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
<8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src2,
|
|
|
|
i32 addrspace(1)* nocapture %dst) {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%vec1 = load <8 x i4>, <8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src1
|
|
|
|
%vec2 = load <8 x i4>, <8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%cvec1 = zext <8 x i4> %vec1 to <8 x i32>
|
|
|
|
%cvec2 = zext <8 x i4> %vec2 to <8 x i32>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%mul = mul <8 x i32> %cvec1, %cvec2
|
|
|
|
%mul0 = extractelement <8 x i32> %mul, i64 0
|
|
|
|
%mul1 = extractelement <8 x i32> %mul, i64 1
|
|
|
|
%mul2 = extractelement <8 x i32> %mul, i64 2
|
|
|
|
%mul3 = extractelement <8 x i32> %mul, i64 3
|
|
|
|
%mul4 = extractelement <8 x i32> %mul, i64 4
|
|
|
|
%mul5 = extractelement <8 x i32> %mul, i64 5
|
|
|
|
%mul6 = extractelement <8 x i32> %mul, i64 6
|
|
|
|
%mul7 = extractelement <8 x i32> %mul, i64 7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%acc = load i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %dst, align 4
|
|
|
|
%add1 = add i32 %mul0, %acc
|
|
|
|
%add2 = add i32 %add1, %mul1
|
|
|
|
%add3 = add i32 %add2, %mul2
|
|
|
|
%add4 = add i32 %add3, %mul3
|
|
|
|
%add5 = add i32 %add4, %mul4
|
|
|
|
%add6 = add i32 %add5, %mul5
|
|
|
|
%add7 = add i32 %add6, %mul6
|
|
|
|
%add8 = add i32 %add7, %mul7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
store i32 %add8, i32 addrspace(1)* %dst, align 4
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; TODO: Clean up the code(by default pk_mad_I16 should be generated), then
|
|
|
|
; support the pattern.
|
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @udot8_acc16_vecMul(<8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src1,
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-LABEL: udot8_acc16_vecMul:
|
|
|
|
; GFX7: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0xd
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s3, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s2, -1
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: buffer_load_ushort v0, off, s[0:3], 0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s4, s[4:5], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s5, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-07-30 00:33:56 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s4, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s17, s5, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s19, s5, 0x40004
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, s17
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s5, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s15, s5, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s16, s5, 0x40010
|
2020-07-30 00:33:56 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s18, s5, 0x40008
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s13, s5, 28
|
2020-07-30 00:33:56 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s5, s5, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s12, s4, 0x40004
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s19
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mul_u32_u24_e32 v2, s12, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mul_u32_u24_e32 v4, s10, v4
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s6, s4, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s7, s4, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s8, s4, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s9, s4, 0x40010
|
2020-07-30 00:33:56 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s11, s4, 0x40008
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s18
|
2020-07-30 00:33:56 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s4, s4, 15
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s5
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mul_u32_u24_e32 v1, s4, v1
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v2, 16, v2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mul_u32_u24_e32 v3, s11, v3
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v4, 16, v4
|
2020-07-30 00:33:56 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v3, v3, v4
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v1, v1, v2
|
2020-07-30 00:33:56 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_alignbit_b32 v2, v3, v2, 16
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_lshrrev_b32_e32 v4, 16, v3
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v5, s16
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v6, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v7, s14
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v0, vcc, v0, v1
|
2020-07-30 00:33:56 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v0, vcc, v2, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v0, vcc, v3, v0
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v0, vcc, v4, v0
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s9, v5, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s8, v6, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s7, v7, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s13
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s6, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: buffer_store_short v0, off, s[0:3], 0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-LABEL: udot8_acc16_vecMul:
|
|
|
|
; GFX8: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: flat_load_ushort v2, v[0:1]
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[4:5], 0x0
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s2, s0, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s1, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s11, s1, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s12, s1, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s13, s1, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s1, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s15, s1, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s9, s1, 28
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_and_b32 s1, s1, 15
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s0, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s4, s0, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s0, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s6, s0, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s7, s0, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s8, s0, 0x40004
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_and_b32 s0, s0, 15
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s1
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v5, s14
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v6, s13
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v7, s12
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v8, s11
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v9, s10
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s0, v3, v2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s8, v4, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, 0xffff, v2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s7, v5, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s6, v6, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s5, v7, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s4, v8, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s3, v9, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s9
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, v3, v2
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: flat_store_short v[0:1], v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: udot8_acc16_vecMul:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s6, s[6:7], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s2, s[4:5], 0x0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s7, s6, 0x40018
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s12, s6, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s7, s7, s12
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s2, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s4, s2, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s13, s6, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s6, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s3, s3, s4
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s7
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_mul_lo_u16 v2, s3, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s3, s13, s14
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s2, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s8, s2, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s15, s6, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s16, s6, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_and_b32 s17, s6, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s3
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s4, s5, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s9, s2, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s2, 0x4000c
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s6, s6, 0x40004
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s3, s15, s16
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_mul_lo_u16 v3, s4, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_and_b32 s11, s2, 15
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s2, 0x40004
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s3
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s4, s9, s10
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s3, s17, s6
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_mul_lo_u16 v4, s4, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s2, s11, s2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s3
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_pk_mul_lo_u16 v5, s2, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_ushort v6, v[0:1], off
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v6, v5, v6
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v5, v6, v5 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:WORD_1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v5, v5, v4 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:WORD_0 src1_sel:BYTE_0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v4, v5, v4 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:WORD_1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v4, v4, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v3, v4, v3 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:WORD_1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v3, v3, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v2, v3, v2 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:WORD_1
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_short v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
2018-10-05 00:57:37 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-LABEL: udot8_acc16_vecMul:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s6, s[6:7], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s2, s[4:5], 0x0
|
2018-10-05 00:57:37 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s7, s6, 0x40018
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s12, s6, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s7, s7, s12
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s2, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s4, s2, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s13, s6, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s6, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s3, s3, s4
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s7
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_pk_mul_lo_u16 v2, s3, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s3, s13, s14
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s2, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s8, s2, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s15, s6, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s16, s6, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_and_b32 s17, s6, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s3
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s4, s5, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s9, s2, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s2, 0x4000c
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s6, s6, 0x40004
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s3, s15, s16
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_pk_mul_lo_u16 v3, s4, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_and_b32 s11, s2, 15
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s2, 0x40004
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s3
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s4, s9, s10
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s3, s17, s6
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_pk_mul_lo_u16 v4, s4, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s2, s11, s2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s3
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_pk_mul_lo_u16 v5, s2, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: global_load_ushort v6, v[0:1], off
|
2018-10-05 00:57:37 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v6, v5, v6
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v5, v6, v5 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:WORD_1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v5, v5, v4 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:WORD_0 src1_sel:BYTE_0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v4, v5, v4 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:WORD_1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v4, v4, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v3, v4, v3 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:WORD_1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v3, v3, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v2, v3, v2 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:WORD_1
|
2018-10-05 00:57:37 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: global_store_short v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-LABEL: udot8_acc16_vecMul:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[2:3], s[0:1], 0x34
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s2
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-01-14 06:54:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: global_load_ushort v2, v[0:1], off
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[0:1], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[2:3], 0x0
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_and_b32 s2, s0, 15
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s0, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_and_b32 s3, s1, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s4, s1, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s2, s2, s5
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s3, s3, s4
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s4, s1, 0x40008
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_pk_mul_lo_u16 v3, s2, s3
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s1, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s0, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s0, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s4, s4, s5
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s2, s2, s3
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s0, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_pk_mul_lo_u16 v4, s2, s4
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s0, 0x40010
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s4, s1, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s1, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s2, s2, s3
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s4, s4, s5
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s1, 0x40018
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s1, s1, 28
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s1, s3, s1
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_e32 v2, v3, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v3 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:WORD_1
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_pk_mul_lo_u16 v3, s2, s4
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s0, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s0, s0, 28
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v4 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:WORD_0 src1_sel:BYTE_0
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_pack_ll_b32_b16 s0, s2, s0
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v4 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:WORD_1
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_pk_mul_lo_u16 v4, s0, s1
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_e32 v2, v2, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v3 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:WORD_1
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_e32 v2, v2, v4
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v4 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:WORD_1
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: global_store_short v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
<8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src2,
|
|
|
|
i16 addrspace(1)* nocapture %dst) {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%vec1 = load <8 x i4>, <8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src1
|
|
|
|
%vec2 = load <8 x i4>, <8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%cvec1 = zext <8 x i4> %vec1 to <8 x i16>
|
|
|
|
%cvec2 = zext <8 x i4> %vec2 to <8 x i16>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%mul = mul <8 x i16> %cvec1, %cvec2
|
|
|
|
%mul0 = extractelement <8 x i16> %mul, i64 0
|
|
|
|
%mul1 = extractelement <8 x i16> %mul, i64 1
|
|
|
|
%mul2 = extractelement <8 x i16> %mul, i64 2
|
|
|
|
%mul3 = extractelement <8 x i16> %mul, i64 3
|
|
|
|
%mul4 = extractelement <8 x i16> %mul, i64 4
|
|
|
|
%mul5 = extractelement <8 x i16> %mul, i64 5
|
|
|
|
%mul6 = extractelement <8 x i16> %mul, i64 6
|
|
|
|
%mul7 = extractelement <8 x i16> %mul, i64 7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%acc = load i16, i16 addrspace(1)* %dst, align 4
|
|
|
|
%add1 = add i16 %mul0, %acc
|
|
|
|
%add2 = add i16 %add1, %mul1
|
|
|
|
%add3 = add i16 %add2, %mul2
|
|
|
|
%add4 = add i16 %add3, %mul3
|
|
|
|
%add5 = add i16 %add4, %mul4
|
|
|
|
%add6 = add i16 %add5, %mul5
|
|
|
|
%add7 = add i16 %add6, %mul6
|
|
|
|
%add8 = add i16 %add7, %mul7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
store i16 %add8, i16 addrspace(1)* %dst, align 4
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; TODO: Cleanup the code to generate MAD; pattern should be recognized then.
|
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @udot8_acc8_vecMul(<8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src1,
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-LABEL: udot8_acc8_vecMul:
|
|
|
|
; GFX7: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0xd
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s3, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s2, -1
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: buffer_load_ubyte v0, off, s[0:3], 0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s4, s[4:5], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s5, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s6, s4, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s13, s5, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s15, s5, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s17, s5, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v8, s13
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s5, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s16, s5, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s18, s5, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s19, s5, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s8, s4, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v6, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s10, s4, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, s17
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mul_u32_u24_e32 v4, s10, v4
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mul_u32_u24_e32 v6, s8, v6
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mul_u32_u24_e32 v8, s6, v8
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s5, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s7, s4, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v7, s14
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s9, s4, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v5, s16
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s11, s4, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s18
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s12, s4, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s19
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mul_u32_u24_e32 v2, s12, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s4, s4, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s5
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mul_u32_u24_e32 v3, s11, v3
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v4, 8, v4
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mul_u32_u24_e32 v5, s9, v5
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mul_u32_u24_e32 v7, s7, v7
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v6, 8, v6
|
2019-07-23 20:39:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v8, 8, v8
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v3, v3, v4
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v4, v5, v6
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v5, v7, v8
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mul_u32_u24_e32 v9, s4, v1
|
2019-07-23 20:39:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v2, 8, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v2, v9, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v3, 16, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b32_e32 v5, 16, v5
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v2, v2, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v3, v4, v5
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_alignbit_b32 v4, v2, v3, 8
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_alignbit_b32 v5, v2, v3, 16
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_lshrrev_b32_e32 v6, 24, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_lshrrev_b32_e32 v7, 8, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_lshrrev_b32_e32 v8, 16, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_lshrrev_b32_e32 v2, 24, v2
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2019-07-23 20:39:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v0, vcc, v0, v3
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v0, vcc, v4, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v0, vcc, v5, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v0, vcc, v6, v0
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s4, v1, v0
|
2019-07-23 20:39:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v0, vcc, v0, v7
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v0, vcc, v0, v8
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_add_i32_e32 v0, vcc, v0, v2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: buffer_store_byte v0, off, s[0:3], 0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-LABEL: udot8_acc8_vecMul:
|
|
|
|
; GFX8: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: flat_load_ubyte v2, v[0:1]
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[4:5], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s2, s[6:7], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s0, 0xffff
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s7, s1, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s9, s1, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s2, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_and_b32 s15, s2, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s16, s2, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s1, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s5, s1, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s2, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s11, s2, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s12, s2, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s13, s2, 0x40018
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s2, 0x40008
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_and_b32 s8, s1, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, s16
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v5, s9
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v6, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v7, s14
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v8, s7
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mul_u32_u24_sdwa v4, v5, v4 dst_sel:BYTE_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:DWORD
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mul_u32_u24_e32 v5, s8, v6
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mul_u32_u24_sdwa v6, v8, v7 dst_sel:BYTE_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:DWORD
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s4, s1, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s6, s1, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v9, s13
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s1, s1, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v10, s12
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v11, s5
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v12, s11
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v13, s10
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v14, s3
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mul_u32_u24_e32 v3, s1, v3
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v5, v5, v6
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mul_u32_u24_e32 v7, s6, v9
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mul_u32_u24_sdwa v8, v11, v10 dst_sel:BYTE_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:DWORD
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mul_u32_u24_e32 v9, s4, v12
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mul_u32_u24_sdwa v10, v14, v13 dst_sel:BYTE_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v5, s0, v5
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_or_b32_sdwa v3, v3, v4 dst_sel:WORD_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:DWORD
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v9, v9, v10
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_or_b32_sdwa v7, v7, v8 dst_sel:WORD_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v4, s0, v9
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v3, v5, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v6, v4, v7
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_lshrrev_b32_e32 v7, 8, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_lshrrev_b32_e32 v8, 8, v6
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, vcc, v2, v5
|
2019-07-23 20:39:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, vcc, v7, v2
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v2, vcc, v3, v2 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:BYTE_2 src1_sel:BYTE_0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v2, vcc, v3, v2 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:BYTE_3 src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, vcc, v2, v4
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, vcc, v8, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v2, vcc, v6, v2 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:WORD_1 src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v2, vcc, v6, v2 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:BYTE_3 src1_sel:DWORD
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: flat_store_byte v[0:1], v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: udot8_acc8_vecMul:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_ubyte v2, v[0:1], off
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[4:5], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s2, s[6:7], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s0, 0xffff
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s1, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s2, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s11, s2, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s12, s2, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s13, s2, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_and_b32 s14, s2, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s15, s2, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s16, s2, 0x40008
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s10
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s2, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s4, s1, 0x40014
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, s11
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s1, 0x40018
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v5, s12
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s6, s1, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v6, s13
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_and_b32 s7, s1, 15
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v7, s14
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s8, s1, 0x40004
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v8, s15
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s9, s1, 0x40008
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v9, s16
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s1, s1, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v10, s2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_e32 v3, s3, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_sdwa v4, s4, v4 dst_sel:BYTE_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_e32 v5, s5, v5
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_sdwa v6, s6, v6 dst_sel:BYTE_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_e32 v7, s7, v7
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_sdwa v8, s8, v8 dst_sel:BYTE_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:DWORD
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v3, v3, v4
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_or_b32_sdwa v4, v5, v6 dst_sel:WORD_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:DWORD
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v5, v7, v8
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_e32 v9, s9, v9
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_sdwa v10, s1, v10 dst_sel:BYTE_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v5, s0, v5
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_or_b32_sdwa v6, v9, v10 dst_sel:WORD_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v6, v5, v6
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshrrev_b32_e32 v7, 8, v6
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v3, s0, v3
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v4, v3, v4
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, v5, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, v2, v7
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v6 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:BYTE_0 src1_sel:BYTE_2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v6 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:BYTE_3
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, v2, v3
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_lshrrev_b32_e32 v3, 8, v4
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, v2, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v4 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:WORD_1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v4 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:BYTE_3
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_byte v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
2018-10-05 00:57:37 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-LABEL: udot8_acc8_vecMul:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: global_load_ubyte v2, v[0:1], off
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[4:5], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s2, s[6:7], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s0, 0xffff
|
2018-10-05 00:57:37 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s1, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s2, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s11, s2, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s12, s2, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s13, s2, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_and_b32 s14, s2, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s15, s2, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s16, s2, 0x40008
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s10
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s2, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s4, s1, 0x40014
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, s11
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s1, 0x40018
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v5, s12
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s6, s1, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v6, s13
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_and_b32 s7, s1, 15
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v7, s14
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s8, s1, 0x40004
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v8, s15
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s9, s1, 0x40008
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v9, s16
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s1, s1, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v10, s2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_e32 v3, s3, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_sdwa v4, s4, v4 dst_sel:BYTE_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_e32 v5, s5, v5
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_sdwa v6, s6, v6 dst_sel:BYTE_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_e32 v7, s7, v7
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_sdwa v8, s8, v8 dst_sel:BYTE_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:DWORD
|
2018-10-05 00:57:37 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v3, v3, v4
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_or_b32_sdwa v4, v5, v6 dst_sel:WORD_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:DWORD
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v5, v7, v8
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_e32 v9, s9, v9
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_sdwa v10, s1, v10 dst_sel:BYTE_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v5, s0, v5
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_or_b32_sdwa v6, v9, v10 dst_sel:WORD_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:DWORD
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v6, v5, v6
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_lshrrev_b32_e32 v7, 8, v6
|
2020-01-07 23:43:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v3, s0, v3
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v4, v3, v4
|
2018-10-05 00:57:37 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, v5, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, v2, v7
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v6 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:BYTE_0 src1_sel:BYTE_2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v6 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:BYTE_3
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, v2, v3
|
2018-10-05 00:57:37 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_lshrrev_b32_e32 v3, 8, v4
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, v2, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v4 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:WORD_1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_add_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v4 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:BYTE_3
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: global_store_byte v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-LABEL: udot8_acc8_vecMul:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[2:3], s[0:1], 0x34
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s2
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-01-14 06:54:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: global_load_ubyte v2, v[0:1], off
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[0:1], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[2:3], 0x0
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s0, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s1, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_and_b32 s2, s0, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_e64 v3, s3, s5
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_and_b32 s3, s1, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s6, s0, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s1, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_e64 v4, s2, s3
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_e64 v5, s6, s5
|
2019-10-09 01:36:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v3, 8, v3
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s4, s0, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s1, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s3, 0xffff
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_e64 v6, s4, s2
|
2019-10-09 01:36:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v3, v4, v3
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v5, 8, v5
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s4, s0, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s6, s1, 0x40014
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s0, 0x40010
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v3, s3, v3
|
2019-10-09 01:36:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_or_b32_sdwa v4, v6, v5 dst_sel:WORD_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:DWORD
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_e64 v5, s4, s6
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s0, 0x40018
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s7, s1, 0x40010
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s0, s0, 28
|
2019-10-09 01:36:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v4, v3, v4
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s4, s1, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_e64 v6, s2, s7
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_e64 v7, s0, s4
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v5, 8, v5
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_lshrrev_b32_e32 v8, 8, v4
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s0, s1, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mul_lo_u16_e64 v10, s5, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v5, v6, v5
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_lshlrev_b16_e64 v7, 8, v7
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v5, s3, v5
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2019-10-09 01:36:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_e32 v2, v3, v2
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_or_b32_sdwa v3, v10, v7 dst_sel:WORD_1 dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:DWORD
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_e32 v2, v2, v8
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_or_b32_e32 v3, v5, v3
|
2019-10-09 01:36:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v4 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:BYTE_0 src1_sel:BYTE_2
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v4 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:BYTE_3
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_lshrrev_b32_e32 v4, 8, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_e32 v2, v2, v5
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_e32 v2, v2, v4
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v3 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:WORD_1
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_sdwa v2, v2, v3 dst_sel:DWORD dst_unused:UNUSED_PAD src0_sel:DWORD src1_sel:BYTE_3
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: global_store_byte v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
<8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src2,
|
|
|
|
i8 addrspace(1)* nocapture %dst) {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%vec1 = load <8 x i4>, <8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src1
|
|
|
|
%vec2 = load <8 x i4>, <8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%cvec1 = zext <8 x i4> %vec1 to <8 x i8>
|
|
|
|
%cvec2 = zext <8 x i4> %vec2 to <8 x i8>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%mul = mul <8 x i8> %cvec1, %cvec2
|
|
|
|
%mul0 = extractelement <8 x i8> %mul, i64 0
|
|
|
|
%mul1 = extractelement <8 x i8> %mul, i64 1
|
|
|
|
%mul2 = extractelement <8 x i8> %mul, i64 2
|
|
|
|
%mul3 = extractelement <8 x i8> %mul, i64 3
|
|
|
|
%mul4 = extractelement <8 x i8> %mul, i64 4
|
|
|
|
%mul5 = extractelement <8 x i8> %mul, i64 5
|
|
|
|
%mul6 = extractelement <8 x i8> %mul, i64 6
|
|
|
|
%mul7 = extractelement <8 x i8> %mul, i64 7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%acc = load i8, i8 addrspace(1)* %dst, align 4
|
|
|
|
%add1 = add i8 %mul0, %acc
|
|
|
|
%add2 = add i8 %add1, %mul1
|
|
|
|
%add3 = add i8 %add2, %mul2
|
|
|
|
%add4 = add i8 %add3, %mul3
|
|
|
|
%add5 = add i8 %add4, %mul4
|
|
|
|
%add6 = add i8 %add5, %mul5
|
|
|
|
%add7 = add i8 %add6, %mul6
|
|
|
|
%add8 = add i8 %add7, %mul7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
store i8 %add8, i8 addrspace(1)* %dst, align 4
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; TODO: Once the adictional "and+add" are removed, the pattern will be recognized.
|
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @udot8_acc4_vecMul(<8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src1,
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-LABEL: udot8_acc4_vecMul:
|
|
|
|
; GFX7: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0xd
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s3, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s2, -1
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: buffer_load_ubyte v0, off, s[0:3], 0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s4, s[4:5], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s5, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s6, s4, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s5, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s15, s5, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s16, s5, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s17, s5, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s18, s5, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s19, s5, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s13, s5, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s5, s5, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s7, s4, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s8, s4, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s9, s4, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s4, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s11, s4, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s12, s4, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s4, s4, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s5
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v2, s19
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s18
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, s17
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v5, s16
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v6, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v7, s14
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s4, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s12, v2, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s11, v3, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s10, v4, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s9, v5, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s8, v6, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s7, v7, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s13
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s6, v1, v0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v0, 15, v0
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: buffer_store_byte v0, off, s[0:3], 0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-LABEL: udot8_acc4_vecMul:
|
|
|
|
; GFX8: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: flat_load_ubyte v2, v[0:1]
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[4:5], 0x0
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_and_b32 s8, s0, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_and_b32 s15, s1, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s1, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s1, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s11, s1, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s12, s1, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s13, s1, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s9, s1, 28
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s1, s1, 0x4000c
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s7, s0, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v5, s14
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s2, s0, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s0, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s4, s0, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s0, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s6, s0, 0x40008
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s0, s0, 0x4000c
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s1
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v6, s13
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mul_u32_u24_e32 v3, s0, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v3, 15, v3
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v7, s12
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v8, s11
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v9, s10
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s8, v4, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s7, v5, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s6, v6, v2
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, 15, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, vcc, v3, v2
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s5, v7, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s4, v8, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s3, v9, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s9
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, v3, v2
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, 15, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: flat_store_byte v[0:1], v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: udot8_acc4_vecMul:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_load_ubyte v2, v[0:1], off
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[4:5], 0x0
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_and_b32 s8, s0, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_and_b32 s15, s1, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s1, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s1, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s11, s1, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s12, s1, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s13, s1, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s9, s1, 28
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s1, s1, 0x4000c
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s7, s0, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v5, s14
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s2, s0, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s0, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s4, s0, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s0, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s6, s0, 0x40008
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s0, s0, 0x4000c
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s1
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v6, s13
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mul_u32_u24_e32 v3, s0, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v3, 15, v3
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v7, s12
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v8, s11
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v9, s10
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s8, v4, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s7, v5, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s6, v6, v2
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, 15, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, v2, v3
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s5, v7, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s4, v8, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s3, v9, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s9
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, v3, v2
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, 15, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_byte v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
2018-10-05 00:57:37 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-LABEL: udot8_acc4_vecMul:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: global_load_ubyte v2, v[0:1], off
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[4:5], 0x0
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[6:7], 0x0
|
2018-10-05 00:57:37 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_and_b32 s8, s0, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_and_b32 s15, s1, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s1, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v4, s15
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s1, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s11, s1, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s12, s1, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s13, s1, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s9, s1, 28
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s1, s1, 0x4000c
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s7, s0, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v5, s14
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s2, s0, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s0, 0x40018
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s4, s0, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s0, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s6, s0, 0x40008
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s0, s0, 0x4000c
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s1
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v6, s13
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mul_u32_u24_e32 v3, s0, v3
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v3, 15, v3
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v7, s12
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v8, s11
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v9, s10
|
2019-07-23 20:39:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s8, v4, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s7, v5, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s6, v6, v2
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, 15, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_add_u32_e32 v2, v2, v3
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s5, v7, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s4, v8, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s3, v9, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v3, s9
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, v3, v2
|
2018-10-05 00:57:37 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, 15, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: global_store_byte v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-LABEL: udot8_acc4_vecMul:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[2:3], s[0:1], 0x34
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s2
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2020-01-14 06:54:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: global_load_ubyte v2, v[0:1], off
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[0:1], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[2:3], 0x0
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_and_b32 s2, s0, 15
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_and_b32 s3, s1, 15
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s4, s1, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s5, s1, 0x4000c
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt vmcnt(0)
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, s3, v2
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s0, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s1, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, s3, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s0, 0x40008
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s0, 0x4000c
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mul_u32_u24_e64 v3, s3, s5
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, s4, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s0, 0x40010
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s1, 0x40010
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v3, 15, v3
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, 15, v2
|
2019-07-27 20:48:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_add_nc_u32_e32 v2, v2, v3
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, s3, v2
|
2020-03-11 19:33:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s0, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s1, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, s3, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s2, s0, 0x40018
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s3, s1, 0x40018
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s0, s0, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s1, s1, 28
|
2020-01-22 06:27:57 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s2, s3, v2
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s0, s1, v2
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_and_b32_e32 v2, 15, v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: global_store_byte v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2018-09-19 00:59:48 +08:00
|
|
|
<8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src2,
|
|
|
|
i4 addrspace(1)* nocapture %dst) {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%vec1 = load <8 x i4>, <8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src1
|
|
|
|
%vec2 = load <8 x i4>, <8 x i4> addrspace(1)* %src2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%mul = mul <8 x i4> %vec1, %vec2
|
|
|
|
%mul0 = extractelement <8 x i4> %mul, i64 0
|
|
|
|
%mul1 = extractelement <8 x i4> %mul, i64 1
|
|
|
|
%mul2 = extractelement <8 x i4> %mul, i64 2
|
|
|
|
%mul3 = extractelement <8 x i4> %mul, i64 3
|
|
|
|
%mul4 = extractelement <8 x i4> %mul, i64 4
|
|
|
|
%mul5 = extractelement <8 x i4> %mul, i64 5
|
|
|
|
%mul6 = extractelement <8 x i4> %mul, i64 6
|
|
|
|
%mul7 = extractelement <8 x i4> %mul, i64 7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%acc = load i4, i4 addrspace(1)* %dst, align 4
|
|
|
|
%add1 = add i4 %mul0, %acc
|
|
|
|
%add2 = add i4 %add1, %mul1
|
|
|
|
%add3 = add i4 %add2, %mul2
|
|
|
|
%add4 = add i4 %add3, %mul3
|
|
|
|
%add5 = add i4 %add4, %mul4
|
|
|
|
%add6 = add i4 %add5, %mul5
|
|
|
|
%add7 = add i4 %add6, %mul6
|
|
|
|
%add8 = add i4 %add7, %mul7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
store i4 %add8, i4 addrspace(1)* %dst, align 4
|
2018-10-05 00:57:37 +08:00
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-11-02 06:48:19 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define amdgpu_kernel void @udot8_variant1(i32 addrspace(1)* %v1addr,
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-LABEL: udot8_variant1:
|
|
|
|
; GFX7: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x9
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0xd
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s3, 0xf000
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_mov_b32 s2, -1
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s4, s[4:5], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s5, s[6:7], 0x0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_load_dword s20, s[0:1], 0x0
|
2018-11-02 06:48:19 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s6, s4, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_and_b32 s7, s5, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s8, s4, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s4, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s12, s4, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s4, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s16, s4, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s18, s4, 0x40018
|
2018-11-02 06:48:19 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s4, s4, 28
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s6
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s20
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s7, v0, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s9, s5, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s11, s5, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s13, s5, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s15, s5, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s17, s5, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s19, s5, 0x40018
|
2018-11-02 06:48:19 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s5, s5, 28
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s4
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s5, v1, v0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s9, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s10
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s11, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s12
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s13, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s14
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s15, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s16
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s17, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s18
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s19, v1, v0
|
2018-11-02 06:48:19 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: buffer_store_dword v0, off, s[0:3], 0
|
|
|
|
; GFX7-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-LABEL: udot8_variant1:
|
|
|
|
; GFX8: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s2, s[4:5], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s3, s[6:7], 0x0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_load_dword s18, s[0:1], 0x0
|
2018-11-02 06:48:19 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_and_b32 s4, s2, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_and_b32 s5, s3, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s6, s2, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s8, s2, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s2, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s12, s2, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s2, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s16, s2, 0x40018
|
2018-11-02 06:48:19 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s2, s2, 28
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s4
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s18
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s5, v0, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s7, s3, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s9, s3, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s11, s3, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s13, s3, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s15, s3, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s17, s3, 0x40018
|
2018-11-02 06:48:19 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s3, s3, 28
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s3, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s6
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s7, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s9, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s10
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s11, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s12
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s13, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s14
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s15, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s16
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s17, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
2018-11-02 06:48:19 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: flat_store_dword v[0:1], v2
|
|
|
|
; GFX8-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-LABEL: udot8_variant1:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s2, s[4:5], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s3, s[6:7], 0x0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_load_dword s18, s[0:1], 0x0
|
2018-11-02 06:48:19 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_and_b32 s4, s2, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_and_b32 s5, s3, 15
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s6, s2, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s8, s2, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s10, s2, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s12, s2, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s14, s2, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s16, s2, 0x40018
|
2018-11-02 06:48:19 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s2, s2, 28
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s4
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s18
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s5, v0, v1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s7, s3, 0x40004
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s9, s3, 0x40008
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s11, s3, 0x4000c
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s13, s3, 0x40010
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s15, s3, 0x40014
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_bfe_u32 s17, s3, 0x40018
|
2018-11-02 06:48:19 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_lshr_b32 s3, s3, 28
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s3, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s6
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s7, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s8
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s9, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s10
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s11, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s12
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s13, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s14
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v0, s15, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s16
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mad_u32_u24 v2, s17, v1, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
2018-11-02 06:48:19 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: global_store_dword v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-LABEL: udot8_variant1:
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[4:7], s[0:1], 0x24
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[0:1], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s2, s[4:5], 0x0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s3, s[0:1], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s4, s[6:7], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s2
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s3
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_dot8_u32_u4 v2, s4, v0, v1
|
2018-11-02 06:48:19 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s0
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s1
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: global_store_dword v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX9-DL-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-LABEL: udot8_variant1:
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL: ; %bb.0: ; %entry
|
2020-05-01 23:43:12 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_clause 0x1
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx2 s[4:5], s[0:1], 0x34
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dwordx4 s[0:3], s[0:1], 0x24
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: ; implicit-def: $vcc_hi
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s6, s[4:5], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s0, s[0:1], 0x0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_load_dword s1, s[2:3], 0x0
|
[AMDGPU] Fix typo in SIInstrInfo::memOpsHaveSameBasePtr
Summary:
The typo has been present since memOpsHaveSameBasePtr was introduced in
r313208.
It caused SIInstrInfo::shouldClusterMemOps to cluster more mem ops than
it was supposed to.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71616
2019-12-18 00:09:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_waitcnt lgkmcnt(0)
|
[AMDGPU] Remove dubious logic in bidirectional list scheduler
Summary:
pickNodeBidirectional tried to compare the best top candidate and the
best bottom candidate by examining TopCand.Reason and BotCand.Reason.
This is unsound because, after calling pickNodeFromQueue, Cand.Reason
does not reflect the most important reason why Cand was chosen. Rather
it reflects the most recent reason why it beat some other potential
candidate, which could have been for some low priority tie breaker
reason.
I have seen this cause problems where TopCand is a good candidate, but
because TopCand.Reason is ORDER (which is very low priority) it is
repeatedly ignored in favour of a mediocre BotCand. This is not how
bidirectional scheduling is supposed to work.
To fix this I changed the code to always compare TopCand and BotCand
directly, like the generic implementation of pickNodeBidirectional does.
This removes some uncommented AMDGPU-specific logic; if this logic turns
out to be important then perhaps it could be moved into an override of
tryCandidate instead.
Graphics shader benchmarking on gfx10 shows a lot more positive than
negative effects from this change.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellar, rampitec, kzhuravl, vpykhtin, dstuttard, tpr, atrick, MatzeB
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, t-tye, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68338
2019-10-07 22:33:59 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s6
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_dot8_u32_u4 v2, s1, s0, v0
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v0, s4
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: v_mov_b32_e32 v1, s5
|
2019-06-21 00:29:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: global_store_dword v[0:1], v2, off
|
|
|
|
; GFX10-DL-NEXT: s_endpgm
|
2018-11-02 06:48:19 +08:00
|
|
|
i32 addrspace(1)* %v2addr,
|
|
|
|
i32 addrspace(1)* %dst) {
|
|
|
|
entry:
|
|
|
|
%v1 = load i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %v1addr, align 4
|
|
|
|
%v2 = load i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %v2addr, align 4
|
|
|
|
%and = and i32 %v1, 15
|
|
|
|
%and1 = and i32 %v2, 15
|
|
|
|
%mul1 = mul nuw nsw i32 %and1, %and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%shr = lshr i32 %v1, 4
|
|
|
|
%and2 = and i32 %shr, 15
|
|
|
|
%shr3 = lshr i32 %v2, 4
|
|
|
|
%and4 = and i32 %shr3, 15
|
|
|
|
%mul2 = mul nuw nsw i32 %and4, %and2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%shr6 = lshr i32 %v1, 8
|
|
|
|
%and7 = and i32 %shr6, 15
|
|
|
|
%shr8 = lshr i32 %v2, 8
|
|
|
|
%and9 = and i32 %shr8, 15
|
|
|
|
%mul3 = mul nuw nsw i32 %and9, %and7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%shr12 = lshr i32 %v1, 12
|
|
|
|
%and13 = and i32 %shr12, 15
|
|
|
|
%shr14 = lshr i32 %v2, 12
|
|
|
|
%and15 = and i32 %shr14, 15
|
|
|
|
%mul4 = mul nuw nsw i32 %and15, %and13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%shr18 = lshr i32 %v1, 16
|
|
|
|
%and19 = and i32 %shr18, 15
|
|
|
|
%shr20 = lshr i32 %v2, 16
|
|
|
|
%and21 = and i32 %shr20, 15
|
|
|
|
%mul5 = mul nuw nsw i32 %and21, %and19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%shr24 = lshr i32 %v1, 20
|
|
|
|
%and25 = and i32 %shr24, 15
|
|
|
|
%shr26 = lshr i32 %v2, 20
|
|
|
|
%and27 = and i32 %shr26, 15
|
|
|
|
%mul6 = mul nuw nsw i32 %and27, %and25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%shr30 = lshr i32 %v1, 24
|
|
|
|
%and31 = and i32 %shr30, 15
|
|
|
|
%shr32 = lshr i32 %v2, 24
|
|
|
|
%and33 = and i32 %shr32, 15
|
|
|
|
%mul7 = mul nuw nsw i32 %and33, %and31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%shr36 = lshr i32 %v1, 28
|
|
|
|
%shr37 = lshr i32 %v2, 28
|
|
|
|
%mul8 = mul nuw nsw i32 %shr37, %shr36
|
|
|
|
%acc = load i32, i32 addrspace(1)* %dst, align 4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%add1 = add i32 %mul1, %acc
|
|
|
|
%add2 = add i32 %add1, %mul8
|
|
|
|
%add3 = add i32 %add2, %mul2
|
|
|
|
%add4 = add i32 %add3, %mul3
|
|
|
|
%add5 = add i32 %add4, %mul4
|
|
|
|
%add6 = add i32 %add5, %mul5
|
|
|
|
%add7 = add i32 %add6, %mul6
|
|
|
|
%add8 = add i32 %add7, %mul7
|
|
|
|
store i32 %add8, i32 addrspace(1)* %dst, align 4
|
|
|
|
ret void
|
|
|
|
}
|