[lldb][NFC] Fix all formatting errors in .cpp file headers
Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).
This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).
Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258
2020-01-24 15:23:27 +08:00
|
|
|
//===-- BroadcasterTest.cpp -----------------------------------------------===//
|
Fix a race in Broadcaster/Listener interaction
Summary:
The following problem was occuring:
- broadcaster B had two listeners: L1 and L2 (thread T1)
- (T1) B has started to broadcast an event, it has locked a shared_ptr to L1 (in
ListenerIterator())
- on another thread T2 the penultimate reference to L1 was destroyed (the transient object in B is
now the last reference)
- (T2) the last reference to L2 was destroyed as well
- (T1) B has finished broadcasting the event to L1 and destroyed the last shared_ptr
- (T1) this triggered the destructor, which called into B->RemoveListener()
- (T1) all pointers in the m_listeners list were now stale, so RemoveListener emptied the list
- (T1) Eventually control returned to the ListenerIterator() for doing broadcasting, which was
still in the middle of iterating through the list
- (T1) Only now, it was holding onto a dangling iterator. BOOM.
I fix this issue by making sure nothing can interfere with the
iterate-and-remove-expired-pointers loop, by moving this logic into a single function, which
first locks (or clears) the whole list and then returns the list of valid and locked Listeners
for further processing. Instead of std::list I use an llvm::SmallVector which should hopefully
offset the fact that we create a copy of the list for the common case where we have only a few
listeners (no heap allocations).
A slight difference in behaviour is that now RemoveListener does not remove an element from the
list -- it only sets it's mask to 0, which means it will be removed during the next iteration of
GetListeners(). This is purely an implementation detail and it should not be externally
noticable.
I was not able to reproduce this bug reliably without inserting sleep statements into the code,
so I do not add a test for it. Instead, I add some unit tests for the functions that I do modify.
Reviewers: clayborg, jingham
Subscribers: tberghammer, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23406
llvm-svn: 278664
2016-08-15 17:53:08 +08:00
|
|
|
//
|
2019-01-19 16:50:56 +08:00
|
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
|
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
|
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
Fix a race in Broadcaster/Listener interaction
Summary:
The following problem was occuring:
- broadcaster B had two listeners: L1 and L2 (thread T1)
- (T1) B has started to broadcast an event, it has locked a shared_ptr to L1 (in
ListenerIterator())
- on another thread T2 the penultimate reference to L1 was destroyed (the transient object in B is
now the last reference)
- (T2) the last reference to L2 was destroyed as well
- (T1) B has finished broadcasting the event to L1 and destroyed the last shared_ptr
- (T1) this triggered the destructor, which called into B->RemoveListener()
- (T1) all pointers in the m_listeners list were now stale, so RemoveListener emptied the list
- (T1) Eventually control returned to the ListenerIterator() for doing broadcasting, which was
still in the middle of iterating through the list
- (T1) Only now, it was holding onto a dangling iterator. BOOM.
I fix this issue by making sure nothing can interfere with the
iterate-and-remove-expired-pointers loop, by moving this logic into a single function, which
first locks (or clears) the whole list and then returns the list of valid and locked Listeners
for further processing. Instead of std::list I use an llvm::SmallVector which should hopefully
offset the fact that we create a copy of the list for the common case where we have only a few
listeners (no heap allocations).
A slight difference in behaviour is that now RemoveListener does not remove an element from the
list -- it only sets it's mask to 0, which means it will be removed during the next iteration of
GetListeners(). This is purely an implementation detail and it should not be externally
noticable.
I was not able to reproduce this bug reliably without inserting sleep statements into the code,
so I do not add a test for it. Instead, I add some unit tests for the functions that I do modify.
Reviewers: clayborg, jingham
Subscribers: tberghammer, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23406
llvm-svn: 278664
2016-08-15 17:53:08 +08:00
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "gtest/gtest.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018-12-14 23:59:49 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "lldb/Utility/Broadcaster.h"
|
|
|
|
|
#include "lldb/Utility/Event.h"
|
|
|
|
|
#include "lldb/Utility/Listener.h"
|
Move Predicate.h from Host to Utility
Summary:
This class was initially in Host because its implementation used to be
very OS-specific. However, with C++11, it has become a very simple
std::condition_variable wrapper, with no host-specific code.
It is also a general purpose utility class, so it makes sense for it to
live in a place where it can be used by everyone.
This has no effect on the layering right now, but it enables me to later
move the Listener+Broadcaster+Event combo to a lower layer, which is
important, as these are used in a lot of places (notably for launching a
process in Host code).
Reviewers: jingham, zturner, teemperor
Reviewed By: zturner
Subscribers: xiaobai, mgorny, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50384
llvm-svn: 341089
2018-08-31 01:51:10 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "lldb/Utility/Predicate.h"
|
Fix a race in Broadcaster/Listener interaction
Summary:
The following problem was occuring:
- broadcaster B had two listeners: L1 and L2 (thread T1)
- (T1) B has started to broadcast an event, it has locked a shared_ptr to L1 (in
ListenerIterator())
- on another thread T2 the penultimate reference to L1 was destroyed (the transient object in B is
now the last reference)
- (T2) the last reference to L2 was destroyed as well
- (T1) B has finished broadcasting the event to L1 and destroyed the last shared_ptr
- (T1) this triggered the destructor, which called into B->RemoveListener()
- (T1) all pointers in the m_listeners list were now stale, so RemoveListener emptied the list
- (T1) Eventually control returned to the ListenerIterator() for doing broadcasting, which was
still in the middle of iterating through the list
- (T1) Only now, it was holding onto a dangling iterator. BOOM.
I fix this issue by making sure nothing can interfere with the
iterate-and-remove-expired-pointers loop, by moving this logic into a single function, which
first locks (or clears) the whole list and then returns the list of valid and locked Listeners
for further processing. Instead of std::list I use an llvm::SmallVector which should hopefully
offset the fact that we create a copy of the list for the common case where we have only a few
listeners (no heap allocations).
A slight difference in behaviour is that now RemoveListener does not remove an element from the
list -- it only sets it's mask to 0, which means it will be removed during the next iteration of
GetListeners(). This is purely an implementation detail and it should not be externally
noticable.
I was not able to reproduce this bug reliably without inserting sleep statements into the code,
so I do not add a test for it. Instead, I add some unit tests for the functions that I do modify.
Reviewers: clayborg, jingham
Subscribers: tberghammer, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23406
llvm-svn: 278664
2016-08-15 17:53:08 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <thread>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
using namespace lldb;
|
|
|
|
|
using namespace lldb_private;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST(BroadcasterTest, BroadcastEvent) {
|
|
|
|
|
EventSP event_sp;
|
|
|
|
|
Broadcaster broadcaster(nullptr, "test-broadcaster");
|
2016-11-30 18:41:42 +08:00
|
|
|
std::chrono::seconds timeout(0);
|
Fix a race in Broadcaster/Listener interaction
Summary:
The following problem was occuring:
- broadcaster B had two listeners: L1 and L2 (thread T1)
- (T1) B has started to broadcast an event, it has locked a shared_ptr to L1 (in
ListenerIterator())
- on another thread T2 the penultimate reference to L1 was destroyed (the transient object in B is
now the last reference)
- (T2) the last reference to L2 was destroyed as well
- (T1) B has finished broadcasting the event to L1 and destroyed the last shared_ptr
- (T1) this triggered the destructor, which called into B->RemoveListener()
- (T1) all pointers in the m_listeners list were now stale, so RemoveListener emptied the list
- (T1) Eventually control returned to the ListenerIterator() for doing broadcasting, which was
still in the middle of iterating through the list
- (T1) Only now, it was holding onto a dangling iterator. BOOM.
I fix this issue by making sure nothing can interfere with the
iterate-and-remove-expired-pointers loop, by moving this logic into a single function, which
first locks (or clears) the whole list and then returns the list of valid and locked Listeners
for further processing. Instead of std::list I use an llvm::SmallVector which should hopefully
offset the fact that we create a copy of the list for the common case where we have only a few
listeners (no heap allocations).
A slight difference in behaviour is that now RemoveListener does not remove an element from the
list -- it only sets it's mask to 0, which means it will be removed during the next iteration of
GetListeners(). This is purely an implementation detail and it should not be externally
noticable.
I was not able to reproduce this bug reliably without inserting sleep statements into the code,
so I do not add a test for it. Instead, I add some unit tests for the functions that I do modify.
Reviewers: clayborg, jingham
Subscribers: tberghammer, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23406
llvm-svn: 278664
2016-08-15 17:53:08 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-10-05 06:33:39 +08:00
|
|
|
// Create a listener, sign it up, make sure it receives an event.
|
Fix a race in Broadcaster/Listener interaction
Summary:
The following problem was occuring:
- broadcaster B had two listeners: L1 and L2 (thread T1)
- (T1) B has started to broadcast an event, it has locked a shared_ptr to L1 (in
ListenerIterator())
- on another thread T2 the penultimate reference to L1 was destroyed (the transient object in B is
now the last reference)
- (T2) the last reference to L2 was destroyed as well
- (T1) B has finished broadcasting the event to L1 and destroyed the last shared_ptr
- (T1) this triggered the destructor, which called into B->RemoveListener()
- (T1) all pointers in the m_listeners list were now stale, so RemoveListener emptied the list
- (T1) Eventually control returned to the ListenerIterator() for doing broadcasting, which was
still in the middle of iterating through the list
- (T1) Only now, it was holding onto a dangling iterator. BOOM.
I fix this issue by making sure nothing can interfere with the
iterate-and-remove-expired-pointers loop, by moving this logic into a single function, which
first locks (or clears) the whole list and then returns the list of valid and locked Listeners
for further processing. Instead of std::list I use an llvm::SmallVector which should hopefully
offset the fact that we create a copy of the list for the common case where we have only a few
listeners (no heap allocations).
A slight difference in behaviour is that now RemoveListener does not remove an element from the
list -- it only sets it's mask to 0, which means it will be removed during the next iteration of
GetListeners(). This is purely an implementation detail and it should not be externally
noticable.
I was not able to reproduce this bug reliably without inserting sleep statements into the code,
so I do not add a test for it. Instead, I add some unit tests for the functions that I do modify.
Reviewers: clayborg, jingham
Subscribers: tberghammer, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23406
llvm-svn: 278664
2016-08-15 17:53:08 +08:00
|
|
|
ListenerSP listener1_sp = Listener::MakeListener("test-listener1");
|
|
|
|
|
const uint32_t event_mask1 = 1;
|
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(event_mask1,
|
|
|
|
|
listener1_sp->StartListeningForEvents(&broadcaster, event_mask1));
|
|
|
|
|
broadcaster.BroadcastEvent(event_mask1, nullptr);
|
2016-11-30 18:41:42 +08:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(listener1_sp->GetEvent(event_sp, timeout));
|
Fix a race in Broadcaster/Listener interaction
Summary:
The following problem was occuring:
- broadcaster B had two listeners: L1 and L2 (thread T1)
- (T1) B has started to broadcast an event, it has locked a shared_ptr to L1 (in
ListenerIterator())
- on another thread T2 the penultimate reference to L1 was destroyed (the transient object in B is
now the last reference)
- (T2) the last reference to L2 was destroyed as well
- (T1) B has finished broadcasting the event to L1 and destroyed the last shared_ptr
- (T1) this triggered the destructor, which called into B->RemoveListener()
- (T1) all pointers in the m_listeners list were now stale, so RemoveListener emptied the list
- (T1) Eventually control returned to the ListenerIterator() for doing broadcasting, which was
still in the middle of iterating through the list
- (T1) Only now, it was holding onto a dangling iterator. BOOM.
I fix this issue by making sure nothing can interfere with the
iterate-and-remove-expired-pointers loop, by moving this logic into a single function, which
first locks (or clears) the whole list and then returns the list of valid and locked Listeners
for further processing. Instead of std::list I use an llvm::SmallVector which should hopefully
offset the fact that we create a copy of the list for the common case where we have only a few
listeners (no heap allocations).
A slight difference in behaviour is that now RemoveListener does not remove an element from the
list -- it only sets it's mask to 0, which means it will be removed during the next iteration of
GetListeners(). This is purely an implementation detail and it should not be externally
noticable.
I was not able to reproduce this bug reliably without inserting sleep statements into the code,
so I do not add a test for it. Instead, I add some unit tests for the functions that I do modify.
Reviewers: clayborg, jingham
Subscribers: tberghammer, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23406
llvm-svn: 278664
2016-08-15 17:53:08 +08:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(event_mask1, event_sp->GetType());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
// Add one more listener, make sure it works as well.
|
|
|
|
|
ListenerSP listener2_sp = Listener::MakeListener("test-listener2");
|
|
|
|
|
const uint32_t event_mask2 = 1;
|
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(event_mask2, listener2_sp->StartListeningForEvents(
|
|
|
|
|
&broadcaster, event_mask1 | event_mask2));
|
|
|
|
|
broadcaster.BroadcastEvent(event_mask2, nullptr);
|
2016-11-30 18:41:42 +08:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(listener2_sp->GetEvent(event_sp, timeout));
|
Fix a race in Broadcaster/Listener interaction
Summary:
The following problem was occuring:
- broadcaster B had two listeners: L1 and L2 (thread T1)
- (T1) B has started to broadcast an event, it has locked a shared_ptr to L1 (in
ListenerIterator())
- on another thread T2 the penultimate reference to L1 was destroyed (the transient object in B is
now the last reference)
- (T2) the last reference to L2 was destroyed as well
- (T1) B has finished broadcasting the event to L1 and destroyed the last shared_ptr
- (T1) this triggered the destructor, which called into B->RemoveListener()
- (T1) all pointers in the m_listeners list were now stale, so RemoveListener emptied the list
- (T1) Eventually control returned to the ListenerIterator() for doing broadcasting, which was
still in the middle of iterating through the list
- (T1) Only now, it was holding onto a dangling iterator. BOOM.
I fix this issue by making sure nothing can interfere with the
iterate-and-remove-expired-pointers loop, by moving this logic into a single function, which
first locks (or clears) the whole list and then returns the list of valid and locked Listeners
for further processing. Instead of std::list I use an llvm::SmallVector which should hopefully
offset the fact that we create a copy of the list for the common case where we have only a few
listeners (no heap allocations).
A slight difference in behaviour is that now RemoveListener does not remove an element from the
list -- it only sets it's mask to 0, which means it will be removed during the next iteration of
GetListeners(). This is purely an implementation detail and it should not be externally
noticable.
I was not able to reproduce this bug reliably without inserting sleep statements into the code,
so I do not add a test for it. Instead, I add some unit tests for the functions that I do modify.
Reviewers: clayborg, jingham
Subscribers: tberghammer, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23406
llvm-svn: 278664
2016-08-15 17:53:08 +08:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(event_mask2, event_sp->GetType());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Both listeners should get this event.
|
|
|
|
|
broadcaster.BroadcastEvent(event_mask1, nullptr);
|
2016-11-30 18:41:42 +08:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(listener1_sp->GetEvent(event_sp, timeout));
|
Fix a race in Broadcaster/Listener interaction
Summary:
The following problem was occuring:
- broadcaster B had two listeners: L1 and L2 (thread T1)
- (T1) B has started to broadcast an event, it has locked a shared_ptr to L1 (in
ListenerIterator())
- on another thread T2 the penultimate reference to L1 was destroyed (the transient object in B is
now the last reference)
- (T2) the last reference to L2 was destroyed as well
- (T1) B has finished broadcasting the event to L1 and destroyed the last shared_ptr
- (T1) this triggered the destructor, which called into B->RemoveListener()
- (T1) all pointers in the m_listeners list were now stale, so RemoveListener emptied the list
- (T1) Eventually control returned to the ListenerIterator() for doing broadcasting, which was
still in the middle of iterating through the list
- (T1) Only now, it was holding onto a dangling iterator. BOOM.
I fix this issue by making sure nothing can interfere with the
iterate-and-remove-expired-pointers loop, by moving this logic into a single function, which
first locks (or clears) the whole list and then returns the list of valid and locked Listeners
for further processing. Instead of std::list I use an llvm::SmallVector which should hopefully
offset the fact that we create a copy of the list for the common case where we have only a few
listeners (no heap allocations).
A slight difference in behaviour is that now RemoveListener does not remove an element from the
list -- it only sets it's mask to 0, which means it will be removed during the next iteration of
GetListeners(). This is purely an implementation detail and it should not be externally
noticable.
I was not able to reproduce this bug reliably without inserting sleep statements into the code,
so I do not add a test for it. Instead, I add some unit tests for the functions that I do modify.
Reviewers: clayborg, jingham
Subscribers: tberghammer, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23406
llvm-svn: 278664
2016-08-15 17:53:08 +08:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(event_mask1, event_sp->GetType());
|
2016-11-30 18:41:42 +08:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(listener2_sp->GetEvent(event_sp, timeout));
|
Fix a race in Broadcaster/Listener interaction
Summary:
The following problem was occuring:
- broadcaster B had two listeners: L1 and L2 (thread T1)
- (T1) B has started to broadcast an event, it has locked a shared_ptr to L1 (in
ListenerIterator())
- on another thread T2 the penultimate reference to L1 was destroyed (the transient object in B is
now the last reference)
- (T2) the last reference to L2 was destroyed as well
- (T1) B has finished broadcasting the event to L1 and destroyed the last shared_ptr
- (T1) this triggered the destructor, which called into B->RemoveListener()
- (T1) all pointers in the m_listeners list were now stale, so RemoveListener emptied the list
- (T1) Eventually control returned to the ListenerIterator() for doing broadcasting, which was
still in the middle of iterating through the list
- (T1) Only now, it was holding onto a dangling iterator. BOOM.
I fix this issue by making sure nothing can interfere with the
iterate-and-remove-expired-pointers loop, by moving this logic into a single function, which
first locks (or clears) the whole list and then returns the list of valid and locked Listeners
for further processing. Instead of std::list I use an llvm::SmallVector which should hopefully
offset the fact that we create a copy of the list for the common case where we have only a few
listeners (no heap allocations).
A slight difference in behaviour is that now RemoveListener does not remove an element from the
list -- it only sets it's mask to 0, which means it will be removed during the next iteration of
GetListeners(). This is purely an implementation detail and it should not be externally
noticable.
I was not able to reproduce this bug reliably without inserting sleep statements into the code,
so I do not add a test for it. Instead, I add some unit tests for the functions that I do modify.
Reviewers: clayborg, jingham
Subscribers: tberghammer, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23406
llvm-svn: 278664
2016-08-15 17:53:08 +08:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(event_mask2, event_sp->GetType());
|
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fix a race in Broadcaster/Listener interaction
Summary:
The following problem was occuring:
- broadcaster B had two listeners: L1 and L2 (thread T1)
- (T1) B has started to broadcast an event, it has locked a shared_ptr to L1 (in
ListenerIterator())
- on another thread T2 the penultimate reference to L1 was destroyed (the transient object in B is
now the last reference)
- (T2) the last reference to L2 was destroyed as well
- (T1) B has finished broadcasting the event to L1 and destroyed the last shared_ptr
- (T1) this triggered the destructor, which called into B->RemoveListener()
- (T1) all pointers in the m_listeners list were now stale, so RemoveListener emptied the list
- (T1) Eventually control returned to the ListenerIterator() for doing broadcasting, which was
still in the middle of iterating through the list
- (T1) Only now, it was holding onto a dangling iterator. BOOM.
I fix this issue by making sure nothing can interfere with the
iterate-and-remove-expired-pointers loop, by moving this logic into a single function, which
first locks (or clears) the whole list and then returns the list of valid and locked Listeners
for further processing. Instead of std::list I use an llvm::SmallVector which should hopefully
offset the fact that we create a copy of the list for the common case where we have only a few
listeners (no heap allocations).
A slight difference in behaviour is that now RemoveListener does not remove an element from the
list -- it only sets it's mask to 0, which means it will be removed during the next iteration of
GetListeners(). This is purely an implementation detail and it should not be externally
noticable.
I was not able to reproduce this bug reliably without inserting sleep statements into the code,
so I do not add a test for it. Instead, I add some unit tests for the functions that I do modify.
Reviewers: clayborg, jingham
Subscribers: tberghammer, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23406
llvm-svn: 278664
2016-08-15 17:53:08 +08:00
|
|
|
// Now again only one listener should be active.
|
|
|
|
|
broadcaster.BroadcastEvent(event_mask1, nullptr);
|
2016-11-30 18:41:42 +08:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(listener1_sp->GetEvent(event_sp, timeout));
|
Fix a race in Broadcaster/Listener interaction
Summary:
The following problem was occuring:
- broadcaster B had two listeners: L1 and L2 (thread T1)
- (T1) B has started to broadcast an event, it has locked a shared_ptr to L1 (in
ListenerIterator())
- on another thread T2 the penultimate reference to L1 was destroyed (the transient object in B is
now the last reference)
- (T2) the last reference to L2 was destroyed as well
- (T1) B has finished broadcasting the event to L1 and destroyed the last shared_ptr
- (T1) this triggered the destructor, which called into B->RemoveListener()
- (T1) all pointers in the m_listeners list were now stale, so RemoveListener emptied the list
- (T1) Eventually control returned to the ListenerIterator() for doing broadcasting, which was
still in the middle of iterating through the list
- (T1) Only now, it was holding onto a dangling iterator. BOOM.
I fix this issue by making sure nothing can interfere with the
iterate-and-remove-expired-pointers loop, by moving this logic into a single function, which
first locks (or clears) the whole list and then returns the list of valid and locked Listeners
for further processing. Instead of std::list I use an llvm::SmallVector which should hopefully
offset the fact that we create a copy of the list for the common case where we have only a few
listeners (no heap allocations).
A slight difference in behaviour is that now RemoveListener does not remove an element from the
list -- it only sets it's mask to 0, which means it will be removed during the next iteration of
GetListeners(). This is purely an implementation detail and it should not be externally
noticable.
I was not able to reproduce this bug reliably without inserting sleep statements into the code,
so I do not add a test for it. Instead, I add some unit tests for the functions that I do modify.
Reviewers: clayborg, jingham
Subscribers: tberghammer, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23406
llvm-svn: 278664
2016-08-15 17:53:08 +08:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(event_mask1, event_sp->GetType());
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TEST(BroadcasterTest, EventTypeHasListeners) {
|
|
|
|
|
EventSP event_sp;
|
|
|
|
|
Broadcaster broadcaster(nullptr, "test-broadcaster");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const uint32_t event_mask = 1;
|
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(broadcaster.EventTypeHasListeners(event_mask));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
ListenerSP listener_sp = Listener::MakeListener("test-listener");
|
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQ(event_mask,
|
|
|
|
|
listener_sp->StartListeningForEvents(&broadcaster, event_mask));
|
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_TRUE(broadcaster.EventTypeHasListeners(event_mask));
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_FALSE(broadcaster.EventTypeHasListeners(event_mask));
|
|
|
|
|
}
|