llvm-project/clang/test/Parser/control-scope.c

// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -std=c90 -verify
// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -std=c99

int f (int z) { 
  if (z + sizeof (enum {a}))        // expected-note {{previous definition is here}}
    return 1 + sizeof (enum {a});   // expected-error {{redefinition of enumerator 'a'}}
  return 0; 
}
Update tests to use %clang_cc1 instead of 'clang-cc' or 'clang -cc1'. - This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable" which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set a default target). llvm-svn: 91446 2009-12-16 04:14:24 +08:00			`// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -std=c90 -verify`
			`// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -std=c99`
Fix a nasty C99 scope issue that Neil pointed out (for ifs) This fixes test/Parser/control-scope.c llvm-svn: 41263 2007-08-22 13:16:28 +08:00
			`int f (int z) {`
Fix a crash in test/Parser/control-scope.c that testrunner didn't notice because it was a negative test with a fix suggested by Jean-Daniel Dupas. Convert the test from a negative to a positive test to catch stuff like this. llvm-svn: 65708 2009-03-01 03:37:57 +08:00			`if (z + sizeof (enum {a})) // expected-note {{previous definition is here}}`
			`return 1 + sizeof (enum {a}); // expected-error {{redefinition of enumerator 'a'}}`
Fix a nasty C99 scope issue that Neil pointed out (for ifs) This fixes test/Parser/control-scope.c llvm-svn: 41263 2007-08-22 13:16:28 +08:00			`return 0;`
			`}`