llvm-project/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/ubsan-unreachable.cpp

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

84 lines
2.3 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-darwin10 -emit-llvm -o - %s -fsanitize=unreachable | FileCheck %s
[Sanitizers] UBSan unreachable incompatible with ASan in the presence of `noreturn` calls Summary: UBSan wants to detect when unreachable code is actually reached, so it adds instrumentation before every unreachable instruction. However, the optimizer will remove code after calls to functions marked with noreturn. To avoid this UBSan removes noreturn from both the call instruction as well as from the function itself. Unfortunately, ASan relies on this annotation to unpoison the stack by inserting calls to _asan_handle_no_return before noreturn functions. This is important for functions that do not return but access the the stack memory, e.g., unwinder functions *like* longjmp (longjmp itself is actually "double-proofed" via its interceptor). The result is that when ASan and UBSan are combined, the noreturn attributes are missing and ASan cannot unpoison the stack, so it has false positives when stack unwinding is used. Changes: Clang-CodeGen now directly insert calls to `__asan_handle_no_return` when a call to a noreturn function is encountered and both UBsan-unreachable and ASan are enabled. This allows UBSan to continue removing the noreturn attribute from functions without any changes to the ASan pass. Previously generated code: ``` call void @longjmp call void @__asan_handle_no_return call void @__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable ``` Generated code (for now): ``` call void @__asan_handle_no_return call void @longjmp call void @__asan_handle_no_return call void @__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable ``` rdar://problem/40723397 Reviewers: delcypher, eugenis, vsk Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57278 > llvm-svn: 352690 llvm-svn: 352829
2019-02-01 10:51:00 +08:00
void abort() __attribute__((noreturn));
// CHECK-LABEL: define{{.*}} void @_Z14calls_noreturnv()
void calls_noreturn() {
[Sanitizers] UBSan unreachable incompatible with ASan in the presence of `noreturn` calls Summary: UBSan wants to detect when unreachable code is actually reached, so it adds instrumentation before every unreachable instruction. However, the optimizer will remove code after calls to functions marked with noreturn. To avoid this UBSan removes noreturn from both the call instruction as well as from the function itself. Unfortunately, ASan relies on this annotation to unpoison the stack by inserting calls to _asan_handle_no_return before noreturn functions. This is important for functions that do not return but access the the stack memory, e.g., unwinder functions *like* longjmp (longjmp itself is actually "double-proofed" via its interceptor). The result is that when ASan and UBSan are combined, the noreturn attributes are missing and ASan cannot unpoison the stack, so it has false positives when stack unwinding is used. Changes: Clang-CodeGen now directly insert calls to `__asan_handle_no_return` when a call to a noreturn function is encountered and both UBsan-unreachable and ASan are enabled. This allows UBSan to continue removing the noreturn attribute from functions without any changes to the ASan pass. Previously generated code: ``` call void @longjmp call void @__asan_handle_no_return call void @__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable ``` Generated code (for now): ``` call void @__asan_handle_no_return call void @longjmp call void @__asan_handle_no_return call void @__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable ``` rdar://problem/40723397 Reviewers: delcypher, eugenis, vsk Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57278 > llvm-svn: 352690 llvm-svn: 352829
2019-02-01 10:51:00 +08:00
// Check absence ([^#]*) of call site attributes (including noreturn)
// CHECK: call void @_Z5abortv(){{[^#]*}}
abort();
// CHECK: __ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable
// CHECK: unreachable
}
struct A {
[Sanitizers] UBSan unreachable incompatible with ASan in the presence of `noreturn` calls Summary: UBSan wants to detect when unreachable code is actually reached, so it adds instrumentation before every unreachable instruction. However, the optimizer will remove code after calls to functions marked with noreturn. To avoid this UBSan removes noreturn from both the call instruction as well as from the function itself. Unfortunately, ASan relies on this annotation to unpoison the stack by inserting calls to _asan_handle_no_return before noreturn functions. This is important for functions that do not return but access the the stack memory, e.g., unwinder functions *like* longjmp (longjmp itself is actually "double-proofed" via its interceptor). The result is that when ASan and UBSan are combined, the noreturn attributes are missing and ASan cannot unpoison the stack, so it has false positives when stack unwinding is used. Changes: Clang-CodeGen now directly insert calls to `__asan_handle_no_return` when a call to a noreturn function is encountered and both UBsan-unreachable and ASan are enabled. This allows UBSan to continue removing the noreturn attribute from functions without any changes to the ASan pass. Previously generated code: ``` call void @longjmp call void @__asan_handle_no_return call void @__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable ``` Generated code (for now): ``` call void @__asan_handle_no_return call void @longjmp call void @__asan_handle_no_return call void @__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable ``` rdar://problem/40723397 Reviewers: delcypher, eugenis, vsk Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57278 > llvm-svn: 352690 llvm-svn: 352829
2019-02-01 10:51:00 +08:00
// CHECK: declare void @_Z5abortv() [[EXTERN_FN_ATTR:#[0-9]+]]
// CHECK-LABEL: define linkonce_odr void @_ZN1A5call1Ev
void call1() {
[Sanitizers] UBSan unreachable incompatible with ASan in the presence of `noreturn` calls Summary: UBSan wants to detect when unreachable code is actually reached, so it adds instrumentation before every unreachable instruction. However, the optimizer will remove code after calls to functions marked with noreturn. To avoid this UBSan removes noreturn from both the call instruction as well as from the function itself. Unfortunately, ASan relies on this annotation to unpoison the stack by inserting calls to _asan_handle_no_return before noreturn functions. This is important for functions that do not return but access the the stack memory, e.g., unwinder functions *like* longjmp (longjmp itself is actually "double-proofed" via its interceptor). The result is that when ASan and UBSan are combined, the noreturn attributes are missing and ASan cannot unpoison the stack, so it has false positives when stack unwinding is used. Changes: Clang-CodeGen now directly insert calls to `__asan_handle_no_return` when a call to a noreturn function is encountered and both UBsan-unreachable and ASan are enabled. This allows UBSan to continue removing the noreturn attribute from functions without any changes to the ASan pass. Previously generated code: ``` call void @longjmp call void @__asan_handle_no_return call void @__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable ``` Generated code (for now): ``` call void @__asan_handle_no_return call void @longjmp call void @__asan_handle_no_return call void @__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable ``` rdar://problem/40723397 Reviewers: delcypher, eugenis, vsk Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57278 > llvm-svn: 352690 llvm-svn: 352829
2019-02-01 10:51:00 +08:00
// CHECK: call void @_ZN1A16does_not_return2Ev({{.*}}){{[^#]*}}
does_not_return2();
// CHECK: __ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable
// CHECK: unreachable
}
[Sanitizers] UBSan unreachable incompatible with ASan in the presence of `noreturn` calls Summary: UBSan wants to detect when unreachable code is actually reached, so it adds instrumentation before every unreachable instruction. However, the optimizer will remove code after calls to functions marked with noreturn. To avoid this UBSan removes noreturn from both the call instruction as well as from the function itself. Unfortunately, ASan relies on this annotation to unpoison the stack by inserting calls to _asan_handle_no_return before noreturn functions. This is important for functions that do not return but access the the stack memory, e.g., unwinder functions *like* longjmp (longjmp itself is actually "double-proofed" via its interceptor). The result is that when ASan and UBSan are combined, the noreturn attributes are missing and ASan cannot unpoison the stack, so it has false positives when stack unwinding is used. Changes: Clang-CodeGen now directly insert calls to `__asan_handle_no_return` when a call to a noreturn function is encountered and both UBsan-unreachable and ASan are enabled. This allows UBSan to continue removing the noreturn attribute from functions without any changes to the ASan pass. Previously generated code: ``` call void @longjmp call void @__asan_handle_no_return call void @__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable ``` Generated code (for now): ``` call void @__asan_handle_no_return call void @longjmp call void @__asan_handle_no_return call void @__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable ``` rdar://problem/40723397 Reviewers: delcypher, eugenis, vsk Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57278 > llvm-svn: 352690 llvm-svn: 352829
2019-02-01 10:51:00 +08:00
// Test static members. Checks are below after `struct A` scope ends.
static void does_not_return1() __attribute__((noreturn)) {
abort();
}
// CHECK-LABEL: define linkonce_odr void @_ZN1A5call2Ev
void call2() {
[Sanitizers] UBSan unreachable incompatible with ASan in the presence of `noreturn` calls Summary: UBSan wants to detect when unreachable code is actually reached, so it adds instrumentation before every unreachable instruction. However, the optimizer will remove code after calls to functions marked with noreturn. To avoid this UBSan removes noreturn from both the call instruction as well as from the function itself. Unfortunately, ASan relies on this annotation to unpoison the stack by inserting calls to _asan_handle_no_return before noreturn functions. This is important for functions that do not return but access the the stack memory, e.g., unwinder functions *like* longjmp (longjmp itself is actually "double-proofed" via its interceptor). The result is that when ASan and UBSan are combined, the noreturn attributes are missing and ASan cannot unpoison the stack, so it has false positives when stack unwinding is used. Changes: Clang-CodeGen now directly insert calls to `__asan_handle_no_return` when a call to a noreturn function is encountered and both UBsan-unreachable and ASan are enabled. This allows UBSan to continue removing the noreturn attribute from functions without any changes to the ASan pass. Previously generated code: ``` call void @longjmp call void @__asan_handle_no_return call void @__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable ``` Generated code (for now): ``` call void @__asan_handle_no_return call void @longjmp call void @__asan_handle_no_return call void @__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable ``` rdar://problem/40723397 Reviewers: delcypher, eugenis, vsk Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57278 > llvm-svn: 352690 llvm-svn: 352829
2019-02-01 10:51:00 +08:00
// CHECK: call void @_ZN1A16does_not_return1Ev(){{[^#]*}}
does_not_return1();
// CHECK: __ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable
// CHECK: unreachable
}
// Test calls through pointers to non-static member functions.
[Sanitizers] UBSan unreachable incompatible with ASan in the presence of `noreturn` calls Summary: UBSan wants to detect when unreachable code is actually reached, so it adds instrumentation before every unreachable instruction. However, the optimizer will remove code after calls to functions marked with noreturn. To avoid this UBSan removes noreturn from both the call instruction as well as from the function itself. Unfortunately, ASan relies on this annotation to unpoison the stack by inserting calls to _asan_handle_no_return before noreturn functions. This is important for functions that do not return but access the the stack memory, e.g., unwinder functions *like* longjmp (longjmp itself is actually "double-proofed" via its interceptor). The result is that when ASan and UBSan are combined, the noreturn attributes are missing and ASan cannot unpoison the stack, so it has false positives when stack unwinding is used. Changes: Clang-CodeGen now directly insert calls to `__asan_handle_no_return` when a call to a noreturn function is encountered and both UBsan-unreachable and ASan are enabled. This allows UBSan to continue removing the noreturn attribute from functions without any changes to the ASan pass. Previously generated code: ``` call void @longjmp call void @__asan_handle_no_return call void @__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable ``` Generated code (for now): ``` call void @__asan_handle_no_return call void @longjmp call void @__asan_handle_no_return call void @__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable ``` rdar://problem/40723397 Reviewers: delcypher, eugenis, vsk Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57278 > llvm-svn: 352690 llvm-svn: 352829
2019-02-01 10:51:00 +08:00
typedef void (A::*MemFn)() __attribute__((noreturn));
// CHECK-LABEL: define linkonce_odr void @_ZN1A5call3Ev
void call3() {
MemFn MF = &A::does_not_return2;
[Sanitizers] UBSan unreachable incompatible with ASan in the presence of `noreturn` calls Summary: UBSan wants to detect when unreachable code is actually reached, so it adds instrumentation before every unreachable instruction. However, the optimizer will remove code after calls to functions marked with noreturn. To avoid this UBSan removes noreturn from both the call instruction as well as from the function itself. Unfortunately, ASan relies on this annotation to unpoison the stack by inserting calls to _asan_handle_no_return before noreturn functions. This is important for functions that do not return but access the the stack memory, e.g., unwinder functions *like* longjmp (longjmp itself is actually "double-proofed" via its interceptor). The result is that when ASan and UBSan are combined, the noreturn attributes are missing and ASan cannot unpoison the stack, so it has false positives when stack unwinding is used. Changes: Clang-CodeGen now directly insert calls to `__asan_handle_no_return` when a call to a noreturn function is encountered and both UBsan-unreachable and ASan are enabled. This allows UBSan to continue removing the noreturn attribute from functions without any changes to the ASan pass. Previously generated code: ``` call void @longjmp call void @__asan_handle_no_return call void @__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable ``` Generated code (for now): ``` call void @__asan_handle_no_return call void @longjmp call void @__asan_handle_no_return call void @__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable ``` rdar://problem/40723397 Reviewers: delcypher, eugenis, vsk Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57278 > llvm-svn: 352690 llvm-svn: 352829
2019-02-01 10:51:00 +08:00
// CHECK: call void %{{[0-9]+\(.*}}){{[^#]*}}
(this->*MF)();
// CHECK: __ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable
// CHECK: unreachable
}
// Test regular members.
// CHECK-LABEL: define linkonce_odr void @_ZN1A16does_not_return2Ev({{.*}})
[Sanitizers] UBSan unreachable incompatible with ASan in the presence of `noreturn` calls Summary: UBSan wants to detect when unreachable code is actually reached, so it adds instrumentation before every unreachable instruction. However, the optimizer will remove code after calls to functions marked with noreturn. To avoid this UBSan removes noreturn from both the call instruction as well as from the function itself. Unfortunately, ASan relies on this annotation to unpoison the stack by inserting calls to _asan_handle_no_return before noreturn functions. This is important for functions that do not return but access the the stack memory, e.g., unwinder functions *like* longjmp (longjmp itself is actually "double-proofed" via its interceptor). The result is that when ASan and UBSan are combined, the noreturn attributes are missing and ASan cannot unpoison the stack, so it has false positives when stack unwinding is used. Changes: Clang-CodeGen now directly insert calls to `__asan_handle_no_return` when a call to a noreturn function is encountered and both UBsan-unreachable and ASan are enabled. This allows UBSan to continue removing the noreturn attribute from functions without any changes to the ASan pass. Previously generated code: ``` call void @longjmp call void @__asan_handle_no_return call void @__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable ``` Generated code (for now): ``` call void @__asan_handle_no_return call void @longjmp call void @__asan_handle_no_return call void @__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable ``` rdar://problem/40723397 Reviewers: delcypher, eugenis, vsk Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57278 > llvm-svn: 352690 llvm-svn: 352829
2019-02-01 10:51:00 +08:00
// CHECK-SAME: [[USER_FN_ATTR:#[0-9]+]]
void does_not_return2() __attribute__((noreturn)) {
// CHECK: call void @_Z5abortv(){{[^#]*}}
abort();
// CHECK: call void @__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable
// CHECK: unreachable
// CHECK: call void @__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable
// CHECK: unreachable
}
};
[Sanitizers] UBSan unreachable incompatible with ASan in the presence of `noreturn` calls Summary: UBSan wants to detect when unreachable code is actually reached, so it adds instrumentation before every unreachable instruction. However, the optimizer will remove code after calls to functions marked with noreturn. To avoid this UBSan removes noreturn from both the call instruction as well as from the function itself. Unfortunately, ASan relies on this annotation to unpoison the stack by inserting calls to _asan_handle_no_return before noreturn functions. This is important for functions that do not return but access the the stack memory, e.g., unwinder functions *like* longjmp (longjmp itself is actually "double-proofed" via its interceptor). The result is that when ASan and UBSan are combined, the noreturn attributes are missing and ASan cannot unpoison the stack, so it has false positives when stack unwinding is used. Changes: Clang-CodeGen now directly insert calls to `__asan_handle_no_return` when a call to a noreturn function is encountered and both UBsan-unreachable and ASan are enabled. This allows UBSan to continue removing the noreturn attribute from functions without any changes to the ASan pass. Previously generated code: ``` call void @longjmp call void @__asan_handle_no_return call void @__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable ``` Generated code (for now): ``` call void @__asan_handle_no_return call void @longjmp call void @__asan_handle_no_return call void @__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable ``` rdar://problem/40723397 Reviewers: delcypher, eugenis, vsk Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57278 > llvm-svn: 352690 llvm-svn: 352829
2019-02-01 10:51:00 +08:00
// CHECK-LABEL: define linkonce_odr void @_ZN1A16does_not_return1Ev()
// CHECK-SAME: [[USER_FN_ATTR]]
// CHECK: call void @_Z5abortv(){{[^#]*}}
void force_irgen() {
A a;
a.call1();
a.call2();
a.call3();
}
[Sanitizers] UBSan unreachable incompatible with ASan in the presence of `noreturn` calls Summary: UBSan wants to detect when unreachable code is actually reached, so it adds instrumentation before every unreachable instruction. However, the optimizer will remove code after calls to functions marked with noreturn. To avoid this UBSan removes noreturn from both the call instruction as well as from the function itself. Unfortunately, ASan relies on this annotation to unpoison the stack by inserting calls to _asan_handle_no_return before noreturn functions. This is important for functions that do not return but access the the stack memory, e.g., unwinder functions *like* longjmp (longjmp itself is actually "double-proofed" via its interceptor). The result is that when ASan and UBSan are combined, the noreturn attributes are missing and ASan cannot unpoison the stack, so it has false positives when stack unwinding is used. Changes: Clang-CodeGen now directly insert calls to `__asan_handle_no_return` when a call to a noreturn function is encountered and both UBsan-unreachable and ASan are enabled. This allows UBSan to continue removing the noreturn attribute from functions without any changes to the ASan pass. Previously generated code: ``` call void @longjmp call void @__asan_handle_no_return call void @__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable ``` Generated code (for now): ``` call void @__asan_handle_no_return call void @longjmp call void @__asan_handle_no_return call void @__ubsan_handle_builtin_unreachable ``` rdar://problem/40723397 Reviewers: delcypher, eugenis, vsk Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57278 > llvm-svn: 352690 llvm-svn: 352829
2019-02-01 10:51:00 +08:00
// `noreturn` should be removed from functions and call sites
// CHECK-LABEL: attributes
// CHECK-NOT: [[USER_FN_ATTR]] = { {{.*noreturn.*}} }
// CHECK-NOT: [[EXTERN_FN_ATTR]] = { {{.*noreturn.*}} }