2002-09-24 08:08:39 +08:00
|
|
|
//===- BreakCriticalEdges.cpp - Critical Edge Elimination Pass ------------===//
|
2005-04-22 07:48:37 +08:00
|
|
|
//
|
2003-10-21 03:43:21 +08:00
|
|
|
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
|
|
|
|
//
|
2007-12-30 04:36:04 +08:00
|
|
|
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
|
|
|
|
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
|
2005-04-22 07:48:37 +08:00
|
|
|
//
|
2003-10-21 03:43:21 +08:00
|
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
2002-09-24 08:08:39 +08:00
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// BreakCriticalEdges pass - Break all of the critical edges in the CFG by
|
|
|
|
// inserting a dummy basic block. This pass may be "required" by passes that
|
|
|
|
// cannot deal with critical edges. For this usage, the structure type is
|
|
|
|
// forward declared. This pass obviously invalidates the CFG, but can update
|
2011-01-18 12:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
// dominator trees.
|
2002-09-24 08:08:39 +08:00
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
|
2006-12-20 06:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
#define DEBUG_TYPE "break-crit-edges"
|
2002-09-24 08:08:39 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar.h"
|
2003-11-10 12:10:50 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.h"
|
2011-01-18 12:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/Dominators.h"
|
2005-08-13 09:38:43 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopInfo.h"
|
2009-09-10 01:53:39 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/ProfileInfo.h"
|
2002-09-24 08:08:39 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Function.h"
|
2004-07-30 01:30:56 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Instructions.h"
|
2005-03-17 23:38:16 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Type.h"
|
2002-09-24 23:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Support/CFG.h"
|
2009-07-12 04:10:48 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Support/ErrorHandling.h"
|
2006-10-03 15:02:02 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h"
|
2004-09-02 06:55:40 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h"
|
2004-01-09 14:12:26 +08:00
|
|
|
using namespace llvm;
|
2003-11-12 06:41:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-20 06:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
STATISTIC(NumBroken, "Number of blocks inserted");
|
2002-09-24 23:43:12 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-12-20 06:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
namespace {
|
2009-10-25 14:33:48 +08:00
|
|
|
struct BreakCriticalEdges : public FunctionPass {
|
2007-05-06 21:37:16 +08:00
|
|
|
static char ID; // Pass identification, replacement for typeid
|
2010-10-20 01:21:58 +08:00
|
|
|
BreakCriticalEdges() : FunctionPass(ID) {
|
|
|
|
initializeBreakCriticalEdgesPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());
|
|
|
|
}
|
2007-05-02 05:15:47 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2002-09-24 23:43:12 +08:00
|
|
|
virtual bool runOnFunction(Function &F);
|
2005-04-22 07:48:37 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2002-09-24 23:43:12 +08:00
|
|
|
virtual void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
|
2007-04-07 13:57:09 +08:00
|
|
|
AU.addPreserved<DominatorTree>();
|
2005-08-13 09:38:43 +08:00
|
|
|
AU.addPreserved<LoopInfo>();
|
2009-09-10 01:53:39 +08:00
|
|
|
AU.addPreserved<ProfileInfo>();
|
2003-10-13 05:52:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// No loop canonicalization guarantees are broken by this pass.
|
|
|
|
AU.addPreservedID(LoopSimplifyID);
|
2002-09-24 23:43:12 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
}
|
2002-09-24 08:08:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2008-05-13 08:00:25 +08:00
|
|
|
char BreakCriticalEdges::ID = 0;
|
2010-08-24 01:52:01 +08:00
|
|
|
INITIALIZE_PASS(BreakCriticalEdges, "break-crit-edges",
|
2010-10-08 06:25:06 +08:00
|
|
|
"Break critical edges in CFG", false, false)
|
2008-05-13 08:00:25 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-04-15 13:18:47 +08:00
|
|
|
// Publicly exposed interface to pass...
|
2010-08-07 02:33:48 +08:00
|
|
|
char &llvm::BreakCriticalEdgesID = BreakCriticalEdges::ID;
|
2004-07-31 18:01:58 +08:00
|
|
|
FunctionPass *llvm::createBreakCriticalEdgesPass() {
|
|
|
|
return new BreakCriticalEdges();
|
|
|
|
}
|
2002-09-24 08:08:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2003-11-10 12:42:42 +08:00
|
|
|
// runOnFunction - Loop over all of the edges in the CFG, breaking critical
|
|
|
|
// edges as they are found.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
bool BreakCriticalEdges::runOnFunction(Function &F) {
|
|
|
|
bool Changed = false;
|
|
|
|
for (Function::iterator I = F.begin(), E = F.end(); I != E; ++I) {
|
|
|
|
TerminatorInst *TI = I->getTerminator();
|
2009-11-01 05:51:10 +08:00
|
|
|
if (TI->getNumSuccessors() > 1 && !isa<IndirectBrInst>(TI))
|
2003-11-10 12:42:42 +08:00
|
|
|
for (unsigned i = 0, e = TI->getNumSuccessors(); i != e; ++i)
|
|
|
|
if (SplitCriticalEdge(TI, i, this)) {
|
|
|
|
++NumBroken;
|
|
|
|
Changed = true;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return Changed;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
// Implementation of the external critical edge manipulation functions
|
|
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
2002-09-24 23:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// isCriticalEdge - Return true if the specified edge is a critical edge.
|
|
|
|
// Critical edges are edges from a block with multiple successors to a block
|
|
|
|
// with multiple predecessors.
|
|
|
|
//
|
2006-10-28 14:58:17 +08:00
|
|
|
bool llvm::isCriticalEdge(const TerminatorInst *TI, unsigned SuccNum,
|
|
|
|
bool AllowIdenticalEdges) {
|
2002-09-24 23:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
assert(SuccNum < TI->getNumSuccessors() && "Illegal edge specification!");
|
2002-10-09 05:06:27 +08:00
|
|
|
if (TI->getNumSuccessors() == 1) return false;
|
2002-09-24 23:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const BasicBlock *Dest = TI->getSuccessor(SuccNum);
|
2010-03-26 07:25:28 +08:00
|
|
|
const_pred_iterator I = pred_begin(Dest), E = pred_end(Dest);
|
2002-09-24 23:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// If there is more than one predecessor, this is a critical edge...
|
|
|
|
assert(I != E && "No preds, but we have an edge to the block?");
|
2006-10-28 14:58:17 +08:00
|
|
|
const BasicBlock *FirstPred = *I;
|
2002-09-24 23:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
++I; // Skip one edge due to the incoming arc from TI.
|
2006-10-28 14:58:17 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!AllowIdenticalEdges)
|
|
|
|
return I != E;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// If AllowIdenticalEdges is true, then we allow this edge to be considered
|
|
|
|
// non-critical iff all preds come from TI's block.
|
2008-04-17 07:46:39 +08:00
|
|
|
while (I != E) {
|
2010-07-10 00:17:52 +08:00
|
|
|
const BasicBlock *P = *I;
|
|
|
|
if (P != FirstPred)
|
2008-04-17 07:46:39 +08:00
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
// Note: leave this as is until no one ever compiles with either gcc 4.0.1
|
|
|
|
// or Xcode 2. This seems to work around the pred_iterator assert in PR 2207
|
2010-07-10 00:17:52 +08:00
|
|
|
E = pred_end(P);
|
2008-04-17 07:46:39 +08:00
|
|
|
++I;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2006-10-28 14:58:17 +08:00
|
|
|
return false;
|
2002-09-24 23:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2009-09-10 02:18:18 +08:00
|
|
|
/// CreatePHIsForSplitLoopExit - When a loop exit edge is split, LCSSA form
|
|
|
|
/// may require new PHIs in the new exit block. This function inserts the
|
|
|
|
/// new PHIs, as needed. Preds is a list of preds inside the loop, SplitBB
|
|
|
|
/// is the new loop exit block, and DestBB is the old loop exit, now the
|
|
|
|
/// successor of SplitBB.
|
|
|
|
static void CreatePHIsForSplitLoopExit(SmallVectorImpl<BasicBlock *> &Preds,
|
|
|
|
BasicBlock *SplitBB,
|
|
|
|
BasicBlock *DestBB) {
|
|
|
|
// SplitBB shouldn't have anything non-trivial in it yet.
|
|
|
|
assert(SplitBB->getFirstNonPHI() == SplitBB->getTerminator() &&
|
|
|
|
"SplitBB has non-PHI nodes!");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// For each PHI in the destination block...
|
|
|
|
for (BasicBlock::iterator I = DestBB->begin();
|
|
|
|
PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(I); ++I) {
|
|
|
|
unsigned Idx = PN->getBasicBlockIndex(SplitBB);
|
|
|
|
Value *V = PN->getIncomingValue(Idx);
|
|
|
|
// If the input is a PHI which already satisfies LCSSA, don't create
|
|
|
|
// a new one.
|
|
|
|
if (const PHINode *VP = dyn_cast<PHINode>(V))
|
|
|
|
if (VP->getParent() == SplitBB)
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
// Otherwise a new PHI is needed. Create one and populate it.
|
2011-03-30 19:28:46 +08:00
|
|
|
PHINode *NewPN = PHINode::Create(PN->getType(), Preds.size(), "split",
|
2009-09-10 02:18:18 +08:00
|
|
|
SplitBB->getTerminator());
|
|
|
|
for (unsigned i = 0, e = Preds.size(); i != e; ++i)
|
|
|
|
NewPN->addIncoming(V, Preds[i]);
|
|
|
|
// Update the original PHI.
|
|
|
|
PN->setIncomingValue(Idx, NewPN);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2008-04-21 08:19:16 +08:00
|
|
|
/// SplitCriticalEdge - If this edge is a critical edge, insert a new node to
|
2011-01-18 12:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
/// split the critical edge. This will update DominatorTree information if it
|
|
|
|
/// is available, thus calling this pass will not invalidate either of them.
|
|
|
|
/// This returns the new block if the edge was split, null otherwise.
|
2009-11-01 05:51:10 +08:00
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// If MergeIdenticalEdges is true (not the default), *all* edges from TI to the
|
|
|
|
/// specified successor will be merged into the same critical edge block.
|
|
|
|
/// This is most commonly interesting with switch instructions, which may
|
|
|
|
/// have many edges to any one destination. This ensures that all edges to that
|
|
|
|
/// dest go to one block instead of each going to a different block, but isn't
|
|
|
|
/// the standard definition of a "critical edge".
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// It is invalid to call this function on a critical edge that starts at an
|
|
|
|
/// IndirectBrInst. Splitting these edges will almost always create an invalid
|
2009-11-02 02:17:37 +08:00
|
|
|
/// program because the address of the new block won't be the one that is jumped
|
2009-11-01 05:51:10 +08:00
|
|
|
/// to.
|
|
|
|
///
|
2009-09-08 23:45:00 +08:00
|
|
|
BasicBlock *llvm::SplitCriticalEdge(TerminatorInst *TI, unsigned SuccNum,
|
|
|
|
Pass *P, bool MergeIdenticalEdges) {
|
|
|
|
if (!isCriticalEdge(TI, SuccNum, MergeIdenticalEdges)) return 0;
|
2009-11-01 05:51:10 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert(!isa<IndirectBrInst>(TI) &&
|
|
|
|
"Cannot split critical edge from IndirectBrInst");
|
|
|
|
|
2002-09-24 23:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
BasicBlock *TIBB = TI->getParent();
|
2002-10-31 10:44:36 +08:00
|
|
|
BasicBlock *DestBB = TI->getSuccessor(SuccNum);
|
2002-09-24 23:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2011-08-18 05:04:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// Splitting the critical edge to a landing pad block is non-trivial. Don't do
|
|
|
|
// it in this generic function.
|
2011-09-21 06:28:17 +08:00
|
|
|
if (DestBB->isLandingPad()) return 0;
|
2011-08-18 05:04:05 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2002-09-24 23:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
// Create a new basic block, linking it into the CFG.
|
2009-08-14 05:58:54 +08:00
|
|
|
BasicBlock *NewBB = BasicBlock::Create(TI->getContext(),
|
|
|
|
TIBB->getName() + "." + DestBB->getName() + "_crit_edge");
|
2010-02-13 12:24:19 +08:00
|
|
|
// Create our unconditional branch.
|
2011-05-18 03:43:06 +08:00
|
|
|
BranchInst *NewBI = BranchInst::Create(DestBB, NewBB);
|
|
|
|
NewBI->setDebugLoc(TI->getDebugLoc());
|
2005-04-22 07:48:37 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-10-28 14:44:56 +08:00
|
|
|
// Branch to the new block, breaking the edge.
|
2002-09-24 23:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
TI->setSuccessor(SuccNum, NewBB);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Insert the block into the function... right after the block TI lives in.
|
|
|
|
Function &F = *TIBB->getParent();
|
2007-04-18 02:09:47 +08:00
|
|
|
Function::iterator FBBI = TIBB;
|
|
|
|
F.getBasicBlockList().insert(++FBBI, NewBB);
|
2006-10-28 14:44:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2002-09-24 23:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
// If there are any PHI nodes in DestBB, we need to update them so that they
|
|
|
|
// merge incoming values from NewBB instead of from TIBB.
|
2011-06-23 17:09:15 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
unsigned BBIdx = 0;
|
|
|
|
for (BasicBlock::iterator I = DestBB->begin(); isa<PHINode>(I); ++I) {
|
|
|
|
// We no longer enter through TIBB, now we come in through NewBB.
|
|
|
|
// Revector exactly one entry in the PHI node that used to come from
|
|
|
|
// TIBB to come from NewBB.
|
|
|
|
PHINode *PN = cast<PHINode>(I);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Reuse the previous value of BBIdx if it lines up. In cases where we
|
|
|
|
// have multiple phi nodes with *lots* of predecessors, this is a speed
|
|
|
|
// win because we don't have to scan the PHI looking for TIBB. This
|
|
|
|
// happens because the BB list of PHI nodes are usually in the same
|
|
|
|
// order.
|
|
|
|
if (PN->getIncomingBlock(BBIdx) != TIBB)
|
|
|
|
BBIdx = PN->getBasicBlockIndex(TIBB);
|
|
|
|
PN->setIncomingBlock(BBIdx, NewBB);
|
2010-02-13 13:01:14 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2002-09-24 23:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2010-02-13 13:01:14 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-10-28 14:44:56 +08:00
|
|
|
// If there are any other edges from TIBB to DestBB, update those to go
|
|
|
|
// through the split block, making those edges non-critical as well (and
|
|
|
|
// reducing the number of phi entries in the DestBB if relevant).
|
|
|
|
if (MergeIdenticalEdges) {
|
|
|
|
for (unsigned i = SuccNum+1, e = TI->getNumSuccessors(); i != e; ++i) {
|
|
|
|
if (TI->getSuccessor(i) != DestBB) continue;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Remove an entry for TIBB from DestBB phi nodes.
|
|
|
|
DestBB->removePredecessor(TIBB);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We found another edge to DestBB, go to NewBB instead.
|
|
|
|
TI->setSuccessor(i, NewBB);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2002-09-24 23:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2002-10-09 05:06:27 +08:00
|
|
|
// If we don't have a pass object, we can't update anything...
|
2009-09-08 23:45:00 +08:00
|
|
|
if (P == 0) return NewBB;
|
2010-02-13 13:01:14 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DominatorTree *DT = P->getAnalysisIfAvailable<DominatorTree>();
|
|
|
|
LoopInfo *LI = P->getAnalysisIfAvailable<LoopInfo>();
|
|
|
|
ProfileInfo *PI = P->getAnalysisIfAvailable<ProfileInfo>();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// If we have nothing to update, just return.
|
2011-01-18 12:11:31 +08:00
|
|
|
if (DT == 0 && LI == 0 && PI == 0)
|
2010-02-13 13:01:14 +08:00
|
|
|
return NewBB;
|
2002-10-09 05:06:27 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-10-03 15:02:02 +08:00
|
|
|
// Now update analysis information. Since the only predecessor of NewBB is
|
|
|
|
// the TIBB, TIBB clearly dominates NewBB. TIBB usually doesn't dominate
|
|
|
|
// anything, as there are other successors of DestBB. However, if all other
|
|
|
|
// predecessors of DestBB are already dominated by DestBB (e.g. DestBB is a
|
|
|
|
// loop header) then NewBB dominates DestBB.
|
|
|
|
SmallVector<BasicBlock*, 8> OtherPreds;
|
2002-09-24 23:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-02-13 12:15:26 +08:00
|
|
|
// If there is a PHI in the block, loop over predecessors with it, which is
|
|
|
|
// faster than iterating pred_begin/end.
|
|
|
|
if (PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(DestBB->begin())) {
|
|
|
|
for (unsigned i = 0, e = PN->getNumIncomingValues(); i != e; ++i)
|
|
|
|
if (PN->getIncomingBlock(i) != NewBB)
|
|
|
|
OtherPreds.push_back(PN->getIncomingBlock(i));
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
for (pred_iterator I = pred_begin(DestBB), E = pred_end(DestBB);
|
2010-07-09 23:25:42 +08:00
|
|
|
I != E; ++I) {
|
|
|
|
BasicBlock *P = *I;
|
|
|
|
if (P != NewBB)
|
2011-01-14 12:23:53 +08:00
|
|
|
OtherPreds.push_back(P);
|
2010-07-09 23:25:42 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2010-02-13 12:15:26 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2010-07-09 23:25:42 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2006-10-03 15:02:02 +08:00
|
|
|
bool NewBBDominatesDestBB = true;
|
|
|
|
|
2002-09-27 00:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
// Should we update DominatorTree information?
|
2010-02-13 13:01:14 +08:00
|
|
|
if (DT) {
|
2007-06-04 08:32:22 +08:00
|
|
|
DomTreeNode *TINode = DT->getNode(TIBB);
|
2005-04-22 07:48:37 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2002-09-27 00:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
// The new block is not the immediate dominator for any other nodes, but
|
|
|
|
// TINode is the immediate dominator for the new node.
|
|
|
|
//
|
2006-10-03 15:02:02 +08:00
|
|
|
if (TINode) { // Don't break unreachable code!
|
2007-06-05 00:43:25 +08:00
|
|
|
DomTreeNode *NewBBNode = DT->addNewBlock(NewBB, TIBB);
|
2007-06-04 08:32:22 +08:00
|
|
|
DomTreeNode *DestBBNode = 0;
|
2006-10-03 15:02:02 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// If NewBBDominatesDestBB hasn't been computed yet, do so with DT.
|
|
|
|
if (!OtherPreds.empty()) {
|
|
|
|
DestBBNode = DT->getNode(DestBB);
|
|
|
|
while (!OtherPreds.empty() && NewBBDominatesDestBB) {
|
2007-06-04 08:32:22 +08:00
|
|
|
if (DomTreeNode *OPNode = DT->getNode(OtherPreds.back()))
|
2007-06-08 01:47:21 +08:00
|
|
|
NewBBDominatesDestBB = DT->dominates(DestBBNode, OPNode);
|
2006-10-03 15:02:02 +08:00
|
|
|
OtherPreds.pop_back();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
OtherPreds.clear();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// If NewBBDominatesDestBB, then NewBB dominates DestBB, otherwise it
|
|
|
|
// doesn't dominate anything.
|
|
|
|
if (NewBBDominatesDestBB) {
|
|
|
|
if (!DestBBNode) DestBBNode = DT->getNode(DestBB);
|
|
|
|
DT->changeImmediateDominator(DestBBNode, NewBBNode);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2002-09-24 23:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2002-10-31 10:44:36 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2005-08-13 09:38:43 +08:00
|
|
|
// Update LoopInfo if it is around.
|
2010-02-13 13:01:14 +08:00
|
|
|
if (LI) {
|
2009-09-08 23:45:00 +08:00
|
|
|
if (Loop *TIL = LI->getLoopFor(TIBB)) {
|
|
|
|
// If one or the other blocks were not in a loop, the new block is not
|
|
|
|
// either, and thus LI doesn't need to be updated.
|
2005-08-13 09:38:43 +08:00
|
|
|
if (Loop *DestLoop = LI->getLoopFor(DestBB)) {
|
|
|
|
if (TIL == DestLoop) {
|
|
|
|
// Both in the same loop, the NewBB joins loop.
|
2007-11-27 11:43:35 +08:00
|
|
|
DestLoop->addBasicBlockToLoop(NewBB, LI->getBase());
|
2009-12-18 09:24:09 +08:00
|
|
|
} else if (TIL->contains(DestLoop)) {
|
2006-10-03 15:02:02 +08:00
|
|
|
// Edge from an outer loop to an inner loop. Add to the outer loop.
|
2007-11-27 11:43:35 +08:00
|
|
|
TIL->addBasicBlockToLoop(NewBB, LI->getBase());
|
2009-12-18 09:24:09 +08:00
|
|
|
} else if (DestLoop->contains(TIL)) {
|
2006-10-03 15:02:02 +08:00
|
|
|
// Edge from an inner loop to an outer loop. Add to the outer loop.
|
2007-11-27 11:43:35 +08:00
|
|
|
DestLoop->addBasicBlockToLoop(NewBB, LI->getBase());
|
2005-08-13 09:38:43 +08:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
// Edge from two loops with no containment relation. Because these
|
|
|
|
// are natural loops, we know that the destination block must be the
|
|
|
|
// header of its loop (adding a branch into a loop elsewhere would
|
|
|
|
// create an irreducible loop).
|
|
|
|
assert(DestLoop->getHeader() == DestBB &&
|
|
|
|
"Should not create irreducible loops!");
|
|
|
|
if (Loop *P = DestLoop->getParentLoop())
|
2007-11-27 11:43:35 +08:00
|
|
|
P->addBasicBlockToLoop(NewBB, LI->getBase());
|
2005-08-13 09:38:43 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2009-09-08 23:45:00 +08:00
|
|
|
// If TIBB is in a loop and DestBB is outside of that loop, split the
|
|
|
|
// other exit blocks of the loop that also have predecessors outside
|
|
|
|
// the loop, to maintain a LoopSimplify guarantee.
|
|
|
|
if (!TIL->contains(DestBB) &&
|
|
|
|
P->mustPreserveAnalysisID(LoopSimplifyID)) {
|
2009-09-10 02:18:18 +08:00
|
|
|
assert(!TIL->contains(NewBB) &&
|
|
|
|
"Split point for loop exit is contained in loop!");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Update LCSSA form in the newly created exit block.
|
|
|
|
if (P->mustPreserveAnalysisID(LCSSAID)) {
|
|
|
|
SmallVector<BasicBlock *, 1> OrigPred;
|
|
|
|
OrigPred.push_back(TIBB);
|
|
|
|
CreatePHIsForSplitLoopExit(OrigPred, NewBB, DestBB);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2009-09-08 23:45:00 +08:00
|
|
|
// For each unique exit block...
|
2011-07-20 06:59:41 +08:00
|
|
|
// FIXME: This code is functionally equivalent to the corresponding
|
|
|
|
// loop in LoopSimplify.
|
2009-09-08 23:45:00 +08:00
|
|
|
SmallVector<BasicBlock *, 4> ExitBlocks;
|
|
|
|
TIL->getExitBlocks(ExitBlocks);
|
|
|
|
for (unsigned i = 0, e = ExitBlocks.size(); i != e; ++i) {
|
|
|
|
// Collect all the preds that are inside the loop, and note
|
|
|
|
// whether there are any preds outside the loop.
|
|
|
|
SmallVector<BasicBlock *, 4> Preds;
|
2009-09-10 02:18:18 +08:00
|
|
|
bool HasPredOutsideOfLoop = false;
|
2009-09-08 23:45:00 +08:00
|
|
|
BasicBlock *Exit = ExitBlocks[i];
|
|
|
|
for (pred_iterator I = pred_begin(Exit), E = pred_end(Exit);
|
2010-07-10 00:31:08 +08:00
|
|
|
I != E; ++I) {
|
|
|
|
BasicBlock *P = *I;
|
2011-07-20 06:59:41 +08:00
|
|
|
if (TIL->contains(P)) {
|
|
|
|
if (isa<IndirectBrInst>(P->getTerminator())) {
|
|
|
|
Preds.clear();
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2010-07-10 00:31:08 +08:00
|
|
|
Preds.push_back(P);
|
2011-07-20 06:59:41 +08:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
2009-09-10 02:18:18 +08:00
|
|
|
HasPredOutsideOfLoop = true;
|
2011-07-20 06:59:41 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2010-07-10 00:31:08 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2009-09-08 23:45:00 +08:00
|
|
|
// If there are any preds not in the loop, we'll need to split
|
|
|
|
// the edges. The Preds.empty() check is needed because a block
|
|
|
|
// may appear multiple times in the list. We can't use
|
|
|
|
// getUniqueExitBlocks above because that depends on LoopSimplify
|
|
|
|
// form, which we're in the process of restoring!
|
2009-09-10 02:18:18 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!Preds.empty() && HasPredOutsideOfLoop) {
|
|
|
|
BasicBlock *NewExitBB =
|
|
|
|
SplitBlockPredecessors(Exit, Preds.data(), Preds.size(),
|
|
|
|
"split", P);
|
|
|
|
if (P->mustPreserveAnalysisID(LCSSAID))
|
|
|
|
CreatePHIsForSplitLoopExit(Preds, NewExitBB, Exit);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2009-09-08 23:45:00 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// LCSSA form was updated above for the case where LoopSimplify is
|
|
|
|
// available, which means that all predecessors of loop exit blocks
|
|
|
|
// are within the loop. Without LoopSimplify form, it would be
|
|
|
|
// necessary to insert a new phi.
|
|
|
|
assert((!P->mustPreserveAnalysisID(LCSSAID) ||
|
|
|
|
P->mustPreserveAnalysisID(LoopSimplifyID)) &&
|
|
|
|
"SplitCriticalEdge doesn't know how to update LCCSA form "
|
|
|
|
"without LoopSimplify!");
|
|
|
|
}
|
2005-08-13 09:38:43 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2009-09-08 23:45:00 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-09-10 01:53:39 +08:00
|
|
|
// Update ProfileInfo if it is around.
|
2010-02-13 13:01:14 +08:00
|
|
|
if (PI)
|
2010-02-13 12:15:26 +08:00
|
|
|
PI->splitEdge(TIBB, DestBB, NewBB, MergeIdenticalEdges);
|
2009-09-10 01:53:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2009-09-08 23:45:00 +08:00
|
|
|
return NewBB;
|
2002-09-24 23:51:56 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|