maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/clang/test/Tooling/clang-check-extra-arg.cpp

10 lines
408 B
C++
Raw Normal View History

clang-check: Enable specification of additional compiler arguments Summary: This adds two command-line parameters: -extra-arg and -extra-arg-before, which enable the user to pass additional parameters to the compiler command. Reviewers: klimek CC: cfe-commits Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D919 llvm-svn: 183320
2013-06-06 00:23:30 +08:00
// RUN: clang-check "%s" -extra-arg=-Wunimplemented-warning -extra-arg-before=-Wunimplemented-warning-before -- -c 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
// CHECK: unknown warning option '-Wunimplemented-warning-before'
// CHECK: unknown warning option '-Wunimplemented-warning'
[clang] - Simplify tools::SplitDebugName. This is an updated version of the D54576, which was reverted. Problem was that SplitDebugName calls the InputInfo::getFilename which asserts if InputInfo given is not of type Filename: const char *getFilename() const { assert(isFilename() && "Invalid accessor."); return Data.Filename; } At the same time at that point, it can be of type Nothing and we need to use getBaseInput(), like original code did. Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55006 llvm-svn: 348352
2018-12-05 19:09:10 +08:00
// Check we do not crash with -extra-arg=-gsplit-dwarf (we did, under linux).
// RUN: clang-check "%s" -extra-arg=-gsplit-dwarf -- -c
int function without a return statement is invalid C++. Changing the return type to void. llvm-svn: 254206
2015-11-28 02:10:49 +08:00
void a(){}