maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/lldb/source/Commands/CommandObjectMultiword.cpp

395 lines
14 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

Initial checkin of lldb code from internal Apple repo. llvm-svn: 105619
2010-06-09 00:52:24 +08:00
//===-- CommandObjectMultiword.cpp ------------------------------*- C++ -*-===//
//
Update the file headers across all of the LLVM projects in the monorepo to reflect the new license. We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach. Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and repository. llvm-svn: 351636
2019-01-19 16:50:56 +08:00
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
Initial checkin of lldb code from internal Apple repo. llvm-svn: 105619
2010-06-09 00:52:24 +08:00
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
Fix Clang-tidy modernize-use-nullptr and modernize-use-default warnings in some files in source/Commands; other minor fixes. llvm-svn: 261389
2016-02-20 08:58:29 +08:00
#include "lldb/Interpreter/CommandObjectMultiword.h"
Very large changes that were needed in order to allow multiple connections to the debugger from GUI windows. Previously there was one global debugger instance that could be accessed that had its own command interpreter and current state (current target/process/thread/frame). When a GUI debugger was attached, if it opened more than one window that each had a console window, there were issues where the last one to setup the global debugger object won and got control of the debugger. To avoid this we now create instances of the lldb_private::Debugger that each has its own state: - target list for targets the debugger instance owns - current process/thread/frame - its own command interpreter - its own input, output and error file handles to avoid conflicts - its own input reader stack So now clients should call: SBDebugger::Initialize(); // (static function) SBDebugger debugger (SBDebugger::Create()); // Use which ever file handles you wish debugger.SetErrorFileHandle (stderr, false); debugger.SetOutputFileHandle (stdout, false); debugger.SetInputFileHandle (stdin, true); // main loop SBDebugger::Terminate(); // (static function) SBDebugger::Initialize() and SBDebugger::Terminate() are ref counted to ensure nothing gets destroyed too early when multiple clients might be attached. Cleaned up the command interpreter and the CommandObject and all subclasses to take more appropriate arguments. llvm-svn: 106615
2010-06-23 09:19:29 +08:00
#include "lldb/Core/Debugger.h"
Initial checkin of lldb code from internal Apple repo. llvm-svn: 105619
2010-06-09 00:52:24 +08:00
#include "lldb/Interpreter/CommandInterpreter.h"
#include "lldb/Interpreter/CommandReturnObject.h"
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
#include "lldb/Interpreter/Options.h"
Initial checkin of lldb code from internal Apple repo. llvm-svn: 105619
2010-06-09 00:52:24 +08:00
using namespace lldb;
using namespace lldb_private;
// CommandObjectMultiword
Fix Clang-tidy modernize-use-nullptr and modernize-use-default warnings in some files in source/Commands; other minor fixes. llvm-svn: 261389
2016-02-20 08:58:29 +08:00
CommandObjectMultiword::CommandObjectMultiword(CommandInterpreter &interpreter,
const char *name,
const char *help,
const char *syntax,
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
uint32_t flags)
: CommandObject(interpreter, name, help, syntax, flags),
m_can_be_removed(false) {}
Initial checkin of lldb code from internal Apple repo. llvm-svn: 105619
2010-06-09 00:52:24 +08:00
Fix Clang-tidy modernize-use-nullptr and modernize-use-default warnings in some files in source/Commands; other minor fixes. llvm-svn: 261389
2016-02-20 08:58:29 +08:00
CommandObjectMultiword::~CommandObjectMultiword() = default;
Initial checkin of lldb code from internal Apple repo. llvm-svn: 105619
2010-06-09 00:52:24 +08:00
Change some more CommandObject functions to StringRef. llvm-svn: 286742
2016-11-13 10:50:32 +08:00
CommandObjectSP CommandObjectMultiword::GetSubcommandSP(llvm::StringRef sub_cmd,
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
StringList *matches) {
CommandObjectSP return_cmd_sp;
CommandObject::CommandMap::iterator pos;
if (!m_subcommand_dict.empty()) {
pos = m_subcommand_dict.find(sub_cmd);
if (pos != m_subcommand_dict.end()) {
// An exact match; append the sub_cmd to the 'matches' string list.
if (matches)
matches->AppendString(sub_cmd);
return_cmd_sp = pos->second;
} else {
StringList local_matches;
if (matches == nullptr)
matches = &local_matches;
int num_matches =
AddNamesMatchingPartialString(m_subcommand_dict, sub_cmd, *matches);
if (num_matches == 1) {
// Cleaner, but slightly less efficient would be to call back into this
Reflow paragraphs in comments. This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit (r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read. FYI, the script I used was: import textwrap import commands import os import sys import re tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1] out = open(tmp, "w+") with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f: header = "" text = "" comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$') special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$') for line in f: match = comment.match(line) if match and not special.match(match.group(2)): # skip intentionally short comments. if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40: out.write(line) continue if text: text += " " + match.group(2) else: header = match.group(1) text = match.group(2) continue if text: filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)), break_long_words=False) for l in filled: out.write(header+" "+l+'\n') text = "" out.write(line) os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1]) Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144 llvm-svn: 331197
2018-05-01 00:49:04 +08:00
// function, since I now know I have an exact match...
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
sub_cmd = matches->GetStringAtIndex(0);
pos = m_subcommand_dict.find(sub_cmd);
if (pos != m_subcommand_dict.end())
return_cmd_sp = pos->second;
}
Initial checkin of lldb code from internal Apple repo. llvm-svn: 105619
2010-06-09 00:52:24 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
}
return return_cmd_sp;
Initial checkin of lldb code from internal Apple repo. llvm-svn: 105619
2010-06-09 00:52:24 +08:00
}
CommandObject *
Change some more CommandObject functions to StringRef. llvm-svn: 286742
2016-11-13 10:50:32 +08:00
CommandObjectMultiword::GetSubcommandObject(llvm::StringRef sub_cmd,
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
StringList *matches) {
return GetSubcommandSP(sub_cmd, matches).get();
Initial checkin of lldb code from internal Apple repo. llvm-svn: 105619
2010-06-09 00:52:24 +08:00
}
Change some more CommandObject functions to StringRef. llvm-svn: 286742
2016-11-13 10:50:32 +08:00
bool CommandObjectMultiword::LoadSubCommand(llvm::StringRef name,
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
const CommandObjectSP &cmd_obj) {
if (cmd_obj)
assert((&GetCommandInterpreter() == &cmd_obj->GetCommandInterpreter()) &&
"tried to add a CommandObject from a different interpreter");
CommandMap::iterator pos;
bool success = true;
pos = m_subcommand_dict.find(name);
if (pos == m_subcommand_dict.end()) {
m_subcommand_dict[name] = cmd_obj;
} else
success = false;
Initial checkin of lldb code from internal Apple repo. llvm-svn: 105619
2010-06-09 00:52:24 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
return success;
Initial checkin of lldb code from internal Apple repo. llvm-svn: 105619
2010-06-09 00:52:24 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
bool CommandObjectMultiword::Execute(const char *args_string,
CommandReturnObject &result) {
Args args(args_string);
const size_t argc = args.GetArgumentCount();
if (argc == 0) {
this->CommandObject::GenerateHelpText(result);
Remove some more uses of Args::GetArgumentAtIndex. llvm-svn: 289188
2016-12-09 13:46:41 +08:00
return result.Succeeded();
}
auto sub_command = args[0].ref;
if (sub_command.empty())
return result.Succeeded();
if (sub_command.equals_lower("help")) {
this->CommandObject::GenerateHelpText(result);
return result.Succeeded();
}
if (m_subcommand_dict.empty()) {
result.AppendErrorWithFormat("'%s' does not have any subcommands.\n",
GetCommandName().str().c_str());
result.SetStatus(eReturnStatusFailed);
return false;
}
StringList matches;
CommandObject *sub_cmd_obj = GetSubcommandObject(sub_command, &matches);
if (sub_cmd_obj != nullptr) {
// Now call CommandObject::Execute to process options in `rest_of_line`.
Reflow paragraphs in comments. This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit (r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read. FYI, the script I used was: import textwrap import commands import os import sys import re tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1] out = open(tmp, "w+") with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f: header = "" text = "" comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$') special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$') for line in f: match = comment.match(line) if match and not special.match(match.group(2)): # skip intentionally short comments. if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40: out.write(line) continue if text: text += " " + match.group(2) else: header = match.group(1) text = match.group(2) continue if text: filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)), break_long_words=False) for l in filled: out.write(header+" "+l+'\n') text = "" out.write(line) os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1]) Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144 llvm-svn: 331197
2018-05-01 00:49:04 +08:00
// From there the command-specific version of Execute will be called, with
// the processed arguments.
Remove some more uses of Args::GetArgumentAtIndex. llvm-svn: 289188
2016-12-09 13:46:41 +08:00
args.Shift();
sub_cmd_obj->Execute(args_string, result);
return result.Succeeded();
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
}
Initial checkin of lldb code from internal Apple repo. llvm-svn: 105619
2010-06-09 00:52:24 +08:00
Remove some more uses of Args::GetArgumentAtIndex. llvm-svn: 289188
2016-12-09 13:46:41 +08:00
std::string error_msg;
const size_t num_subcmd_matches = matches.GetSize();
if (num_subcmd_matches > 0)
error_msg.assign("ambiguous command ");
else
error_msg.assign("invalid command ");
error_msg.append("'");
error_msg.append(GetCommandName());
error_msg.append(" ");
error_msg.append(sub_command);
error_msg.append("'.");
if (num_subcmd_matches > 0) {
error_msg.append(" Possible completions:");
Narrow the CompletionRequest API to being append-only. Summary: We currently allow any completion handler to read and manipulate the list of matches we calculated so far. This leads to a few problems: Firstly, a completion handler's logic can now depend on previously calculated results by another handlers. No completion handler should have such an implicit dependency, but the current API makes it likely that this could happen (or already happens). Especially the fact that some completion handler deleted all previously calculated results can mess things up right now. Secondly, all completion handlers have knowledge about our internal data structures with this API. This makes refactoring this internal data structure much harder than it should be. Especially planned changes like the support of descriptions for completions are currently giant patches because we have to refactor every single completion handler. This patch narrows the contract the CompletionRequest has with the different handlers to: 1. A handler can suggest a completion. 2. A handler can ask how many suggestions we already have. Point 2 obviously means we still have a dependency left between the different handlers, but getting rid of this is too large to just append it to this patch. Otherwise this patch just completely hides the internal StringList to the different handlers. The CompletionRequest API now also ensures that the list of completions is unique and we don't suggest the same value multiple times to the user. This property has been so far only been ensured by the `Option` handler, but is now applied globally. This is part of this patch as the OptionHandler is no longer able to implement this functionality itself. Reviewers: jingham, davide, labath Reviewed By: davide Subscribers: lldb-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49322 llvm-svn: 338151
2018-07-28 02:42:46 +08:00
for (size_t i = 0; i < matches.GetSize(); i++) {
Remove some more uses of Args::GetArgumentAtIndex. llvm-svn: 289188
2016-12-09 13:46:41 +08:00
error_msg.append("\n\t");
error_msg.append(matches.GetStringAtIndex(i));
}
}
error_msg.append("\n");
result.AppendRawError(error_msg.c_str());
result.SetStatus(eReturnStatusFailed);
return false;
Initial checkin of lldb code from internal Apple repo. llvm-svn: 105619
2010-06-09 00:52:24 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
void CommandObjectMultiword::GenerateHelpText(Stream &output_stream) {
Reflow paragraphs in comments. This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit (r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read. FYI, the script I used was: import textwrap import commands import os import sys import re tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1] out = open(tmp, "w+") with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f: header = "" text = "" comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$') special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$') for line in f: match = comment.match(line) if match and not special.match(match.group(2)): # skip intentionally short comments. if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40: out.write(line) continue if text: text += " " + match.group(2) else: header = match.group(1) text = match.group(2) continue if text: filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)), break_long_words=False) for l in filled: out.write(header+" "+l+'\n') text = "" out.write(line) os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1]) Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144 llvm-svn: 331197
2018-05-01 00:49:04 +08:00
// First time through here, generate the help text for the object and push it
// to the return result object as well
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
CommandObject::GenerateHelpText(output_stream);
output_stream.PutCString("\nThe following subcommands are supported:\n\n");
CommandMap::iterator pos;
uint32_t max_len = FindLongestCommandWord(m_subcommand_dict);
if (max_len)
max_len += 4; // Indent the output by 4 spaces.
for (pos = m_subcommand_dict.begin(); pos != m_subcommand_dict.end(); ++pos) {
std::string indented_command(" ");
indented_command.append(pos->first);
if (pos->second->WantsRawCommandString()) {
std::string help_text(pos->second->GetHelp());
help_text.append(" Expects 'raw' input (see 'help raw-input'.)");
m_interpreter.OutputFormattedHelpText(output_stream,
indented_command.c_str(), "--",
help_text.c_str(), max_len);
} else
m_interpreter.OutputFormattedHelpText(output_stream,
indented_command.c_str(), "--",
pos->second->GetHelp(), max_len);
}
output_stream.PutCString("\nFor more help on any particular subcommand, type "
"'help <command> <subcommand>'.\n");
Initial checkin of lldb code from internal Apple repo. llvm-svn: 105619
2010-06-09 00:52:24 +08:00
}
Refactoring for for the internal command line completion API (NFC) Summary: This patch refactors the internal completion API. It now takes (as far as possible) a single CompletionRequest object instead o half a dozen in/out/in-out parameters. The CompletionRequest contains a common superset of the different parameters as far as it makes sense. This includes the raw command line string and raw cursor position, which should make the `expr` command possible to implement (at least without hacks that reconstruct the command line from the args). This patch is not intended to change the observable behavior of lldb in any way. It's also as minimal as possible and doesn't attempt to fix all the problems the API has. Some Q&A: Q: Why is this not fixing all the problems in the completion API? A: Because is a blocker for the expr command completion which I want to get in ASAP. This is the smallest patch that unblocks the expr completion patch and which allows trivial refactoring in the future. The patch also doesn't really change the internal information flow in the API, so that hopefully saves us from ever having to revert and resubmit this humongous patch. Q: Can we merge all the copy-pasted code in the completion methods (like computing the current incomplete arg) into CompletionRequest class? A: Yes, but it's out of scope for this patch. Q: Why the `word_complete = request.GetWordComplete(); ... ` pattern? A: I don't want to add a getter that returns a reference to the internal integer. So we have to use a temporary variable and the Getter/Setter instead. We don't throw exceptions from what I can tell, so the behavior doesn't change. Q: Why are we not owning the list of matches? A: Because that's how the previous API works. But that should be fixed too (in another patch). Q: Can we make the constructor simpler and compute some of the values from the plain command? A: I think this works, but I rather want to have this in a follow up commit. Especially when making nested request it's a bit awkward that the parsed arguments behave as both input/output (as we should in theory propagate the changes on the nested request back to the parent request if we don't want to change the behavior too much). Q: Can't we pass one const request object and then just return another result object instead of mixing them together in one in/out parameter? A: It's hard to get keep the same behavior with that pattern, but I think we can also get a nice API with just a single request object. If we make all input parameters read-only, we have a clear separation between what is actually an input and what an output parameter (and hopefully we get rid of the in-out parameters). Q: Can we throw out the 'match' variables that are not implemented according to the comment? A: We currently just forward them as in the old code to the different methods, even though I think they are really not used. We can easily remove and readd them once every single completion method just takes a CompletionRequest, but for now I prefer NFC behavior from the perspective of the API user. Reviewers: davide, jingham, labath Reviewed By: jingham Subscribers: mgorny, friss, lldb-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48796 llvm-svn: 336146
2018-07-03 05:29:56 +08:00
int CommandObjectMultiword::HandleCompletion(CompletionRequest &request) {
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
// Any of the command matches will provide a complete word, otherwise the
Remove some more uses of Args::GetArgumentAtIndex. llvm-svn: 289188
2016-12-09 13:46:41 +08:00
// individual completers will override this.
Refactoring for for the internal command line completion API (NFC) Summary: This patch refactors the internal completion API. It now takes (as far as possible) a single CompletionRequest object instead o half a dozen in/out/in-out parameters. The CompletionRequest contains a common superset of the different parameters as far as it makes sense. This includes the raw command line string and raw cursor position, which should make the `expr` command possible to implement (at least without hacks that reconstruct the command line from the args). This patch is not intended to change the observable behavior of lldb in any way. It's also as minimal as possible and doesn't attempt to fix all the problems the API has. Some Q&A: Q: Why is this not fixing all the problems in the completion API? A: Because is a blocker for the expr command completion which I want to get in ASAP. This is the smallest patch that unblocks the expr completion patch and which allows trivial refactoring in the future. The patch also doesn't really change the internal information flow in the API, so that hopefully saves us from ever having to revert and resubmit this humongous patch. Q: Can we merge all the copy-pasted code in the completion methods (like computing the current incomplete arg) into CompletionRequest class? A: Yes, but it's out of scope for this patch. Q: Why the `word_complete = request.GetWordComplete(); ... ` pattern? A: I don't want to add a getter that returns a reference to the internal integer. So we have to use a temporary variable and the Getter/Setter instead. We don't throw exceptions from what I can tell, so the behavior doesn't change. Q: Why are we not owning the list of matches? A: Because that's how the previous API works. But that should be fixed too (in another patch). Q: Can we make the constructor simpler and compute some of the values from the plain command? A: I think this works, but I rather want to have this in a follow up commit. Especially when making nested request it's a bit awkward that the parsed arguments behave as both input/output (as we should in theory propagate the changes on the nested request back to the parent request if we don't want to change the behavior too much). Q: Can't we pass one const request object and then just return another result object instead of mixing them together in one in/out parameter? A: It's hard to get keep the same behavior with that pattern, but I think we can also get a nice API with just a single request object. If we make all input parameters read-only, we have a clear separation between what is actually an input and what an output parameter (and hopefully we get rid of the in-out parameters). Q: Can we throw out the 'match' variables that are not implemented according to the comment? A: We currently just forward them as in the old code to the different methods, even though I think they are really not used. We can easily remove and readd them once every single completion method just takes a CompletionRequest, but for now I prefer NFC behavior from the perspective of the API user. Reviewers: davide, jingham, labath Reviewed By: jingham Subscribers: mgorny, friss, lldb-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48796 llvm-svn: 336146
2018-07-03 05:29:56 +08:00
request.SetWordComplete(true);
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
Refactoring for for the internal command line completion API (NFC) Summary: This patch refactors the internal completion API. It now takes (as far as possible) a single CompletionRequest object instead o half a dozen in/out/in-out parameters. The CompletionRequest contains a common superset of the different parameters as far as it makes sense. This includes the raw command line string and raw cursor position, which should make the `expr` command possible to implement (at least without hacks that reconstruct the command line from the args). This patch is not intended to change the observable behavior of lldb in any way. It's also as minimal as possible and doesn't attempt to fix all the problems the API has. Some Q&A: Q: Why is this not fixing all the problems in the completion API? A: Because is a blocker for the expr command completion which I want to get in ASAP. This is the smallest patch that unblocks the expr completion patch and which allows trivial refactoring in the future. The patch also doesn't really change the internal information flow in the API, so that hopefully saves us from ever having to revert and resubmit this humongous patch. Q: Can we merge all the copy-pasted code in the completion methods (like computing the current incomplete arg) into CompletionRequest class? A: Yes, but it's out of scope for this patch. Q: Why the `word_complete = request.GetWordComplete(); ... ` pattern? A: I don't want to add a getter that returns a reference to the internal integer. So we have to use a temporary variable and the Getter/Setter instead. We don't throw exceptions from what I can tell, so the behavior doesn't change. Q: Why are we not owning the list of matches? A: Because that's how the previous API works. But that should be fixed too (in another patch). Q: Can we make the constructor simpler and compute some of the values from the plain command? A: I think this works, but I rather want to have this in a follow up commit. Especially when making nested request it's a bit awkward that the parsed arguments behave as both input/output (as we should in theory propagate the changes on the nested request back to the parent request if we don't want to change the behavior too much). Q: Can't we pass one const request object and then just return another result object instead of mixing them together in one in/out parameter? A: It's hard to get keep the same behavior with that pattern, but I think we can also get a nice API with just a single request object. If we make all input parameters read-only, we have a clear separation between what is actually an input and what an output parameter (and hopefully we get rid of the in-out parameters). Q: Can we throw out the 'match' variables that are not implemented according to the comment? A: We currently just forward them as in the old code to the different methods, even though I think they are really not used. We can easily remove and readd them once every single completion method just takes a CompletionRequest, but for now I prefer NFC behavior from the perspective of the API user. Reviewers: davide, jingham, labath Reviewed By: jingham Subscribers: mgorny, friss, lldb-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48796 llvm-svn: 336146
2018-07-03 05:29:56 +08:00
auto arg0 = request.GetParsedLine()[0].ref;
if (request.GetCursorIndex() == 0) {
Add support for descriptions with command completions. Summary: This patch adds a framework for adding descriptions to the command completions we provide. It also adds descriptions for completed top-level commands so that we can test this code. Completions are in general supposed to be displayed alongside the completion itself. The descriptions can be used to provide additional information about the completion to the user. Examples for descriptions are function signatures when completing function calls in the expression command or the binary name when providing completion for a symbol. There is still some boilerplate code from the old completion API left in LLDB (mostly because the respective APIs are reused for non-completion related purposes, so the CompletionRequest doesn't make sense to be used), so that's why I still had to change some function signatures. Also, as the old API only passes around a list of matches, and the descriptions are for these functions just another list, I had to add some code that essentially just ensures that both lists are always the same side (e.g. all the manual calls to `descriptions->AddString(X)` below a `matches->AddString(Y)` call). The initial command descriptions that come with this patch are just reusing the existing short help that is already added in LLDB. An example completion with descriptions looks like this: ``` (lldb) pl Available completions: platform -- Commands to manage and create platforms. plugin -- Commands for managing LLDB plugins. ``` Reviewers: #lldb, jingham Reviewed By: #lldb, jingham Subscribers: jingham, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51175 llvm-svn: 342181
2018-09-14 05:26:00 +08:00
StringList new_matches, descriptions;
AddNamesMatchingPartialString(m_subcommand_dict, arg0, new_matches,
&descriptions);
request.AddCompletions(new_matches, descriptions);
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
Narrow the CompletionRequest API to being append-only. Summary: We currently allow any completion handler to read and manipulate the list of matches we calculated so far. This leads to a few problems: Firstly, a completion handler's logic can now depend on previously calculated results by another handlers. No completion handler should have such an implicit dependency, but the current API makes it likely that this could happen (or already happens). Especially the fact that some completion handler deleted all previously calculated results can mess things up right now. Secondly, all completion handlers have knowledge about our internal data structures with this API. This makes refactoring this internal data structure much harder than it should be. Especially planned changes like the support of descriptions for completions are currently giant patches because we have to refactor every single completion handler. This patch narrows the contract the CompletionRequest has with the different handlers to: 1. A handler can suggest a completion. 2. A handler can ask how many suggestions we already have. Point 2 obviously means we still have a dependency left between the different handlers, but getting rid of this is too large to just append it to this patch. Otherwise this patch just completely hides the internal StringList to the different handlers. The CompletionRequest API now also ensures that the list of completions is unique and we don't suggest the same value multiple times to the user. This property has been so far only been ensured by the `Option` handler, but is now applied globally. This is part of this patch as the OptionHandler is no longer able to implement this functionality itself. Reviewers: jingham, davide, labath Reviewed By: davide Subscribers: lldb-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49322 llvm-svn: 338151
2018-07-28 02:42:46 +08:00
if (new_matches.GetSize() == 1 &&
new_matches.GetStringAtIndex(0) != nullptr &&
(arg0 == new_matches.GetStringAtIndex(0))) {
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
StringList temp_matches;
CommandObject *cmd_obj = GetSubcommandObject(arg0, &temp_matches);
if (cmd_obj != nullptr) {
Refactoring for for the internal command line completion API (NFC) Summary: This patch refactors the internal completion API. It now takes (as far as possible) a single CompletionRequest object instead o half a dozen in/out/in-out parameters. The CompletionRequest contains a common superset of the different parameters as far as it makes sense. This includes the raw command line string and raw cursor position, which should make the `expr` command possible to implement (at least without hacks that reconstruct the command line from the args). This patch is not intended to change the observable behavior of lldb in any way. It's also as minimal as possible and doesn't attempt to fix all the problems the API has. Some Q&A: Q: Why is this not fixing all the problems in the completion API? A: Because is a blocker for the expr command completion which I want to get in ASAP. This is the smallest patch that unblocks the expr completion patch and which allows trivial refactoring in the future. The patch also doesn't really change the internal information flow in the API, so that hopefully saves us from ever having to revert and resubmit this humongous patch. Q: Can we merge all the copy-pasted code in the completion methods (like computing the current incomplete arg) into CompletionRequest class? A: Yes, but it's out of scope for this patch. Q: Why the `word_complete = request.GetWordComplete(); ... ` pattern? A: I don't want to add a getter that returns a reference to the internal integer. So we have to use a temporary variable and the Getter/Setter instead. We don't throw exceptions from what I can tell, so the behavior doesn't change. Q: Why are we not owning the list of matches? A: Because that's how the previous API works. But that should be fixed too (in another patch). Q: Can we make the constructor simpler and compute some of the values from the plain command? A: I think this works, but I rather want to have this in a follow up commit. Especially when making nested request it's a bit awkward that the parsed arguments behave as both input/output (as we should in theory propagate the changes on the nested request back to the parent request if we don't want to change the behavior too much). Q: Can't we pass one const request object and then just return another result object instead of mixing them together in one in/out parameter? A: It's hard to get keep the same behavior with that pattern, but I think we can also get a nice API with just a single request object. If we make all input parameters read-only, we have a clear separation between what is actually an input and what an output parameter (and hopefully we get rid of the in-out parameters). Q: Can we throw out the 'match' variables that are not implemented according to the comment? A: We currently just forward them as in the old code to the different methods, even though I think they are really not used. We can easily remove and readd them once every single completion method just takes a CompletionRequest, but for now I prefer NFC behavior from the perspective of the API user. Reviewers: davide, jingham, labath Reviewed By: jingham Subscribers: mgorny, friss, lldb-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48796 llvm-svn: 336146
2018-07-03 05:29:56 +08:00
if (request.GetParsedLine().GetArgumentCount() == 1) {
request.SetWordComplete(true);
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
} else {
Refactoring for for the internal command line completion API (NFC) Summary: This patch refactors the internal completion API. It now takes (as far as possible) a single CompletionRequest object instead o half a dozen in/out/in-out parameters. The CompletionRequest contains a common superset of the different parameters as far as it makes sense. This includes the raw command line string and raw cursor position, which should make the `expr` command possible to implement (at least without hacks that reconstruct the command line from the args). This patch is not intended to change the observable behavior of lldb in any way. It's also as minimal as possible and doesn't attempt to fix all the problems the API has. Some Q&A: Q: Why is this not fixing all the problems in the completion API? A: Because is a blocker for the expr command completion which I want to get in ASAP. This is the smallest patch that unblocks the expr completion patch and which allows trivial refactoring in the future. The patch also doesn't really change the internal information flow in the API, so that hopefully saves us from ever having to revert and resubmit this humongous patch. Q: Can we merge all the copy-pasted code in the completion methods (like computing the current incomplete arg) into CompletionRequest class? A: Yes, but it's out of scope for this patch. Q: Why the `word_complete = request.GetWordComplete(); ... ` pattern? A: I don't want to add a getter that returns a reference to the internal integer. So we have to use a temporary variable and the Getter/Setter instead. We don't throw exceptions from what I can tell, so the behavior doesn't change. Q: Why are we not owning the list of matches? A: Because that's how the previous API works. But that should be fixed too (in another patch). Q: Can we make the constructor simpler and compute some of the values from the plain command? A: I think this works, but I rather want to have this in a follow up commit. Especially when making nested request it's a bit awkward that the parsed arguments behave as both input/output (as we should in theory propagate the changes on the nested request back to the parent request if we don't want to change the behavior too much). Q: Can't we pass one const request object and then just return another result object instead of mixing them together in one in/out parameter? A: It's hard to get keep the same behavior with that pattern, but I think we can also get a nice API with just a single request object. If we make all input parameters read-only, we have a clear separation between what is actually an input and what an output parameter (and hopefully we get rid of the in-out parameters). Q: Can we throw out the 'match' variables that are not implemented according to the comment? A: We currently just forward them as in the old code to the different methods, even though I think they are really not used. We can easily remove and readd them once every single completion method just takes a CompletionRequest, but for now I prefer NFC behavior from the perspective of the API user. Reviewers: davide, jingham, labath Reviewed By: jingham Subscribers: mgorny, friss, lldb-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48796 llvm-svn: 336146
2018-07-03 05:29:56 +08:00
request.GetParsedLine().Shift();
request.SetCursorCharPosition(0);
request.GetParsedLine().AppendArgument(llvm::StringRef());
return cmd_obj->HandleCompletion(request);
Initial checkin of lldb code from internal Apple repo. llvm-svn: 105619
2010-06-09 00:52:24 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
}
Initial checkin of lldb code from internal Apple repo. llvm-svn: 105619
2010-06-09 00:52:24 +08:00
}
Narrow the CompletionRequest API to being append-only. Summary: We currently allow any completion handler to read and manipulate the list of matches we calculated so far. This leads to a few problems: Firstly, a completion handler's logic can now depend on previously calculated results by another handlers. No completion handler should have such an implicit dependency, but the current API makes it likely that this could happen (or already happens). Especially the fact that some completion handler deleted all previously calculated results can mess things up right now. Secondly, all completion handlers have knowledge about our internal data structures with this API. This makes refactoring this internal data structure much harder than it should be. Especially planned changes like the support of descriptions for completions are currently giant patches because we have to refactor every single completion handler. This patch narrows the contract the CompletionRequest has with the different handlers to: 1. A handler can suggest a completion. 2. A handler can ask how many suggestions we already have. Point 2 obviously means we still have a dependency left between the different handlers, but getting rid of this is too large to just append it to this patch. Otherwise this patch just completely hides the internal StringList to the different handlers. The CompletionRequest API now also ensures that the list of completions is unique and we don't suggest the same value multiple times to the user. This property has been so far only been ensured by the `Option` handler, but is now applied globally. This is part of this patch as the OptionHandler is no longer able to implement this functionality itself. Reviewers: jingham, davide, labath Reviewed By: davide Subscribers: lldb-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49322 llvm-svn: 338151
2018-07-28 02:42:46 +08:00
return new_matches.GetSize();
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
} else {
Narrow the CompletionRequest API to being append-only. Summary: We currently allow any completion handler to read and manipulate the list of matches we calculated so far. This leads to a few problems: Firstly, a completion handler's logic can now depend on previously calculated results by another handlers. No completion handler should have such an implicit dependency, but the current API makes it likely that this could happen (or already happens). Especially the fact that some completion handler deleted all previously calculated results can mess things up right now. Secondly, all completion handlers have knowledge about our internal data structures with this API. This makes refactoring this internal data structure much harder than it should be. Especially planned changes like the support of descriptions for completions are currently giant patches because we have to refactor every single completion handler. This patch narrows the contract the CompletionRequest has with the different handlers to: 1. A handler can suggest a completion. 2. A handler can ask how many suggestions we already have. Point 2 obviously means we still have a dependency left between the different handlers, but getting rid of this is too large to just append it to this patch. Otherwise this patch just completely hides the internal StringList to the different handlers. The CompletionRequest API now also ensures that the list of completions is unique and we don't suggest the same value multiple times to the user. This property has been so far only been ensured by the `Option` handler, but is now applied globally. This is part of this patch as the OptionHandler is no longer able to implement this functionality itself. Reviewers: jingham, davide, labath Reviewed By: davide Subscribers: lldb-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49322 llvm-svn: 338151
2018-07-28 02:42:46 +08:00
StringList new_matches;
CommandObject *sub_command_object = GetSubcommandObject(arg0, &new_matches);
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (sub_command_object == nullptr) {
Narrow the CompletionRequest API to being append-only. Summary: We currently allow any completion handler to read and manipulate the list of matches we calculated so far. This leads to a few problems: Firstly, a completion handler's logic can now depend on previously calculated results by another handlers. No completion handler should have such an implicit dependency, but the current API makes it likely that this could happen (or already happens). Especially the fact that some completion handler deleted all previously calculated results can mess things up right now. Secondly, all completion handlers have knowledge about our internal data structures with this API. This makes refactoring this internal data structure much harder than it should be. Especially planned changes like the support of descriptions for completions are currently giant patches because we have to refactor every single completion handler. This patch narrows the contract the CompletionRequest has with the different handlers to: 1. A handler can suggest a completion. 2. A handler can ask how many suggestions we already have. Point 2 obviously means we still have a dependency left between the different handlers, but getting rid of this is too large to just append it to this patch. Otherwise this patch just completely hides the internal StringList to the different handlers. The CompletionRequest API now also ensures that the list of completions is unique and we don't suggest the same value multiple times to the user. This property has been so far only been ensured by the `Option` handler, but is now applied globally. This is part of this patch as the OptionHandler is no longer able to implement this functionality itself. Reviewers: jingham, davide, labath Reviewed By: davide Subscribers: lldb-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49322 llvm-svn: 338151
2018-07-28 02:42:46 +08:00
request.AddCompletions(new_matches);
return request.GetNumberOfMatches();
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
} else {
// Remove the one match that we got from calling GetSubcommandObject.
Narrow the CompletionRequest API to being append-only. Summary: We currently allow any completion handler to read and manipulate the list of matches we calculated so far. This leads to a few problems: Firstly, a completion handler's logic can now depend on previously calculated results by another handlers. No completion handler should have such an implicit dependency, but the current API makes it likely that this could happen (or already happens). Especially the fact that some completion handler deleted all previously calculated results can mess things up right now. Secondly, all completion handlers have knowledge about our internal data structures with this API. This makes refactoring this internal data structure much harder than it should be. Especially planned changes like the support of descriptions for completions are currently giant patches because we have to refactor every single completion handler. This patch narrows the contract the CompletionRequest has with the different handlers to: 1. A handler can suggest a completion. 2. A handler can ask how many suggestions we already have. Point 2 obviously means we still have a dependency left between the different handlers, but getting rid of this is too large to just append it to this patch. Otherwise this patch just completely hides the internal StringList to the different handlers. The CompletionRequest API now also ensures that the list of completions is unique and we don't suggest the same value multiple times to the user. This property has been so far only been ensured by the `Option` handler, but is now applied globally. This is part of this patch as the OptionHandler is no longer able to implement this functionality itself. Reviewers: jingham, davide, labath Reviewed By: davide Subscribers: lldb-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49322 llvm-svn: 338151
2018-07-28 02:42:46 +08:00
new_matches.DeleteStringAtIndex(0);
request.AddCompletions(new_matches);
Refactoring for for the internal command line completion API (NFC) Summary: This patch refactors the internal completion API. It now takes (as far as possible) a single CompletionRequest object instead o half a dozen in/out/in-out parameters. The CompletionRequest contains a common superset of the different parameters as far as it makes sense. This includes the raw command line string and raw cursor position, which should make the `expr` command possible to implement (at least without hacks that reconstruct the command line from the args). This patch is not intended to change the observable behavior of lldb in any way. It's also as minimal as possible and doesn't attempt to fix all the problems the API has. Some Q&A: Q: Why is this not fixing all the problems in the completion API? A: Because is a blocker for the expr command completion which I want to get in ASAP. This is the smallest patch that unblocks the expr completion patch and which allows trivial refactoring in the future. The patch also doesn't really change the internal information flow in the API, so that hopefully saves us from ever having to revert and resubmit this humongous patch. Q: Can we merge all the copy-pasted code in the completion methods (like computing the current incomplete arg) into CompletionRequest class? A: Yes, but it's out of scope for this patch. Q: Why the `word_complete = request.GetWordComplete(); ... ` pattern? A: I don't want to add a getter that returns a reference to the internal integer. So we have to use a temporary variable and the Getter/Setter instead. We don't throw exceptions from what I can tell, so the behavior doesn't change. Q: Why are we not owning the list of matches? A: Because that's how the previous API works. But that should be fixed too (in another patch). Q: Can we make the constructor simpler and compute some of the values from the plain command? A: I think this works, but I rather want to have this in a follow up commit. Especially when making nested request it's a bit awkward that the parsed arguments behave as both input/output (as we should in theory propagate the changes on the nested request back to the parent request if we don't want to change the behavior too much). Q: Can't we pass one const request object and then just return another result object instead of mixing them together in one in/out parameter? A: It's hard to get keep the same behavior with that pattern, but I think we can also get a nice API with just a single request object. If we make all input parameters read-only, we have a clear separation between what is actually an input and what an output parameter (and hopefully we get rid of the in-out parameters). Q: Can we throw out the 'match' variables that are not implemented according to the comment? A: We currently just forward them as in the old code to the different methods, even though I think they are really not used. We can easily remove and readd them once every single completion method just takes a CompletionRequest, but for now I prefer NFC behavior from the perspective of the API user. Reviewers: davide, jingham, labath Reviewed By: jingham Subscribers: mgorny, friss, lldb-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48796 llvm-svn: 336146
2018-07-03 05:29:56 +08:00
request.GetParsedLine().Shift();
request.SetCursorIndex(request.GetCursorIndex() - 1);
return sub_command_object->HandleCompletion(request);
Initial checkin of lldb code from internal Apple repo. llvm-svn: 105619
2010-06-09 00:52:24 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
}
Initial checkin of lldb code from internal Apple repo. llvm-svn: 105619
2010-06-09 00:52:24 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
const char *CommandObjectMultiword::GetRepeatCommand(Args &current_command_args,
uint32_t index) {
index++;
if (current_command_args.GetArgumentCount() <= index)
return nullptr;
CommandObject *sub_command_object =
Remove some more uses of Args::GetArgumentAtIndex. llvm-svn: 289188
2016-12-09 13:46:41 +08:00
GetSubcommandObject(current_command_args[index].ref);
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (sub_command_object == nullptr)
return nullptr;
return sub_command_object->GetRepeatCommand(current_command_args, index);
Fix GetRepeatCommand so it works with multi-word commands. Move the "source", "alias", and "unalias" commands to "commands *". Move "source-file" to "source list". Added a "source info" command but it isn't implemented yet. llvm-svn: 107751
2010-07-07 11:36:20 +08:00
}
Change some more CommandObject functions to StringRef. llvm-svn: 286742
2016-11-13 10:50:32 +08:00
void CommandObjectMultiword::AproposAllSubCommands(llvm::StringRef prefix,
llvm::StringRef search_word,
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
StringList &commands_found,
StringList &commands_help) {
CommandObject::CommandMap::const_iterator pos;
for (pos = m_subcommand_dict.begin(); pos != m_subcommand_dict.end(); ++pos) {
const char *command_name = pos->first.c_str();
CommandObject *sub_cmd_obj = pos->second.get();
StreamString complete_command_name;
Fix some StringRef Printf warnings. llvm-svn: 286906
2016-11-15 07:23:31 +08:00
complete_command_name << prefix << " " << command_name;
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (sub_cmd_obj->HelpTextContainsWord(search_word)) {
Don't allow direct access to StreamString's internal buffer. This is a large API change that removes the two functions from StreamString that return a std::string& and a const std::string&, and instead provide one function which returns a StringRef. Direct access to the underlying buffer violates the concept of a "stream" which is intended to provide forward only access, and makes porting to llvm::raw_ostream more difficult in the future. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26698 llvm-svn: 287152
2016-11-17 05:15:24 +08:00
commands_found.AppendString(complete_command_name.GetString());
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
commands_help.AppendString(sub_cmd_obj->GetHelp());
<rdar://problem/12491387> I added the ability for a process plug-in to implement custom commands. All the lldb_private::Process plug-in has to do is override: virtual CommandObject * GetPluginCommandObject(); This object returned should be a multi-word command that vends LLDB commands. There is a sample implementation in ProcessGDBRemote that is hollowed out. It is intended to be used for sending a custom packet, though the body of the command execute function has yet to be implemented! llvm-svn: 165861
2012-10-13 10:07:45 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
if (sub_cmd_obj->IsMultiwordObject())
Change some more CommandObject functions to StringRef. llvm-svn: 286742
2016-11-13 10:50:32 +08:00
sub_cmd_obj->AproposAllSubCommands(complete_command_name.GetString(),
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
search_word, commands_found,
commands_help);
}
<rdar://problem/12491387> I added the ability for a process plug-in to implement custom commands. All the lldb_private::Process plug-in has to do is override: virtual CommandObject * GetPluginCommandObject(); This object returned should be a multi-word command that vends LLDB commands. There is a sample implementation in ProcessGDBRemote that is hollowed out. It is intended to be used for sending a custom packet, though the body of the command execute function has yet to be implemented! llvm-svn: 165861
2012-10-13 10:07:45 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
CommandObjectProxy::CommandObjectProxy(CommandInterpreter &interpreter,
const char *name, const char *help,
const char *syntax, uint32_t flags)
: CommandObject(interpreter, name, help, syntax, flags) {}
Fix Clang-tidy modernize-use-nullptr and modernize-use-default warnings in some files in source/Commands; other minor fixes. llvm-svn: 261389
2016-02-20 08:58:29 +08:00
CommandObjectProxy::~CommandObjectProxy() = default;
<rdar://problem/12491387> I added the ability for a process plug-in to implement custom commands. All the lldb_private::Process plug-in has to do is override: virtual CommandObject * GetPluginCommandObject(); This object returned should be a multi-word command that vends LLDB commands. There is a sample implementation in ProcessGDBRemote that is hollowed out. It is intended to be used for sending a custom packet, though the body of the command execute function has yet to be implemented! llvm-svn: 165861
2012-10-13 10:07:45 +08:00
Make CommandObject help getters/setters use StringRef. llvm-svn: 286731
2016-11-13 04:41:02 +08:00
llvm::StringRef CommandObjectProxy::GetHelpLong() {
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
CommandObject *proxy_command = GetProxyCommandObject();
if (proxy_command)
return proxy_command->GetHelpLong();
Make CommandObject help getters/setters use StringRef. llvm-svn: 286731
2016-11-13 04:41:02 +08:00
return llvm::StringRef();
<rdar://problem/12491387> I added the ability for a process plug-in to implement custom commands. All the lldb_private::Process plug-in has to do is override: virtual CommandObject * GetPluginCommandObject(); This object returned should be a multi-word command that vends LLDB commands. There is a sample implementation in ProcessGDBRemote that is hollowed out. It is intended to be used for sending a custom packet, though the body of the command execute function has yet to be implemented! llvm-svn: 165861
2012-10-13 10:07:45 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
bool CommandObjectProxy::IsRemovable() const {
const CommandObject *proxy_command =
const_cast<CommandObjectProxy *>(this)->GetProxyCommandObject();
if (proxy_command)
return proxy_command->IsRemovable();
return false;
<rdar://problem/12491387> I added the ability for a process plug-in to implement custom commands. All the lldb_private::Process plug-in has to do is override: virtual CommandObject * GetPluginCommandObject(); This object returned should be a multi-word command that vends LLDB commands. There is a sample implementation in ProcessGDBRemote that is hollowed out. It is intended to be used for sending a custom packet, though the body of the command execute function has yet to be implemented! llvm-svn: 165861
2012-10-13 10:07:45 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
bool CommandObjectProxy::IsMultiwordObject() {
CommandObject *proxy_command = GetProxyCommandObject();
if (proxy_command)
return proxy_command->IsMultiwordObject();
return false;
<rdar://problem/12491387> I added the ability for a process plug-in to implement custom commands. All the lldb_private::Process plug-in has to do is override: virtual CommandObject * GetPluginCommandObject(); This object returned should be a multi-word command that vends LLDB commands. There is a sample implementation in ProcessGDBRemote that is hollowed out. It is intended to be used for sending a custom packet, though the body of the command execute function has yet to be implemented! llvm-svn: 165861
2012-10-13 10:07:45 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
CommandObjectMultiword *CommandObjectProxy::GetAsMultiwordCommand() {
CommandObject *proxy_command = GetProxyCommandObject();
if (proxy_command)
return proxy_command->GetAsMultiwordCommand();
return nullptr;
Fix a bug where LLDB would crash if 'apropos <anything>' was used after spawning an inferior process llvm-svn: 266911
2016-04-21 04:48:05 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
void CommandObjectProxy::GenerateHelpText(Stream &result) {
CommandObject *proxy_command = GetProxyCommandObject();
if (proxy_command)
return proxy_command->GenerateHelpText(result);
CommandObjectProxy needs to proxy GenerateHelpText as well as everything else. <rdar://problem/18383591> llvm-svn: 252122
2015-11-05 09:18:07 +08:00
}
Change some more CommandObject functions to StringRef. llvm-svn: 286742
2016-11-13 10:50:32 +08:00
lldb::CommandObjectSP
CommandObjectProxy::GetSubcommandSP(llvm::StringRef sub_cmd,
StringList *matches) {
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
CommandObject *proxy_command = GetProxyCommandObject();
if (proxy_command)
return proxy_command->GetSubcommandSP(sub_cmd, matches);
return lldb::CommandObjectSP();
<rdar://problem/12491387> I added the ability for a process plug-in to implement custom commands. All the lldb_private::Process plug-in has to do is override: virtual CommandObject * GetPluginCommandObject(); This object returned should be a multi-word command that vends LLDB commands. There is a sample implementation in ProcessGDBRemote that is hollowed out. It is intended to be used for sending a custom packet, though the body of the command execute function has yet to be implemented! llvm-svn: 165861
2012-10-13 10:07:45 +08:00
}
Change some more CommandObject functions to StringRef. llvm-svn: 286742
2016-11-13 10:50:32 +08:00
CommandObject *CommandObjectProxy::GetSubcommandObject(llvm::StringRef sub_cmd,
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
StringList *matches) {
CommandObject *proxy_command = GetProxyCommandObject();
if (proxy_command)
return proxy_command->GetSubcommandObject(sub_cmd, matches);
return nullptr;
<rdar://problem/12491387> I added the ability for a process plug-in to implement custom commands. All the lldb_private::Process plug-in has to do is override: virtual CommandObject * GetPluginCommandObject(); This object returned should be a multi-word command that vends LLDB commands. There is a sample implementation in ProcessGDBRemote that is hollowed out. It is intended to be used for sending a custom packet, though the body of the command execute function has yet to be implemented! llvm-svn: 165861
2012-10-13 10:07:45 +08:00
}
Change some more CommandObject functions to StringRef. llvm-svn: 286742
2016-11-13 10:50:32 +08:00
void CommandObjectProxy::AproposAllSubCommands(llvm::StringRef prefix,
llvm::StringRef search_word,
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
StringList &commands_found,
StringList &commands_help) {
CommandObject *proxy_command = GetProxyCommandObject();
if (proxy_command)
return proxy_command->AproposAllSubCommands(prefix, search_word,
commands_found, commands_help);
<rdar://problem/12491387> I added the ability for a process plug-in to implement custom commands. All the lldb_private::Process plug-in has to do is override: virtual CommandObject * GetPluginCommandObject(); This object returned should be a multi-word command that vends LLDB commands. There is a sample implementation in ProcessGDBRemote that is hollowed out. It is intended to be used for sending a custom packet, though the body of the command execute function has yet to be implemented! llvm-svn: 165861
2012-10-13 10:07:45 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
bool CommandObjectProxy::LoadSubCommand(
Change some more CommandObject functions to StringRef. llvm-svn: 286742
2016-11-13 10:50:32 +08:00
llvm::StringRef cmd_name, const lldb::CommandObjectSP &command_sp) {
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
CommandObject *proxy_command = GetProxyCommandObject();
if (proxy_command)
return proxy_command->LoadSubCommand(cmd_name, command_sp);
return false;
<rdar://problem/12491387> I added the ability for a process plug-in to implement custom commands. All the lldb_private::Process plug-in has to do is override: virtual CommandObject * GetPluginCommandObject(); This object returned should be a multi-word command that vends LLDB commands. There is a sample implementation in ProcessGDBRemote that is hollowed out. It is intended to be used for sending a custom packet, though the body of the command execute function has yet to be implemented! llvm-svn: 165861
2012-10-13 10:07:45 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
bool CommandObjectProxy::WantsRawCommandString() {
CommandObject *proxy_command = GetProxyCommandObject();
if (proxy_command)
return proxy_command->WantsRawCommandString();
return false;
<rdar://problem/12491387> I added the ability for a process plug-in to implement custom commands. All the lldb_private::Process plug-in has to do is override: virtual CommandObject * GetPluginCommandObject(); This object returned should be a multi-word command that vends LLDB commands. There is a sample implementation in ProcessGDBRemote that is hollowed out. It is intended to be used for sending a custom packet, though the body of the command execute function has yet to be implemented! llvm-svn: 165861
2012-10-13 10:07:45 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
bool CommandObjectProxy::WantsCompletion() {
CommandObject *proxy_command = GetProxyCommandObject();
if (proxy_command)
return proxy_command->WantsCompletion();
return false;
<rdar://problem/12491387> I added the ability for a process plug-in to implement custom commands. All the lldb_private::Process plug-in has to do is override: virtual CommandObject * GetPluginCommandObject(); This object returned should be a multi-word command that vends LLDB commands. There is a sample implementation in ProcessGDBRemote that is hollowed out. It is intended to be used for sending a custom packet, though the body of the command execute function has yet to be implemented! llvm-svn: 165861
2012-10-13 10:07:45 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
Options *CommandObjectProxy::GetOptions() {
CommandObject *proxy_command = GetProxyCommandObject();
if (proxy_command)
return proxy_command->GetOptions();
return nullptr;
<rdar://problem/12491387> I added the ability for a process plug-in to implement custom commands. All the lldb_private::Process plug-in has to do is override: virtual CommandObject * GetPluginCommandObject(); This object returned should be a multi-word command that vends LLDB commands. There is a sample implementation in ProcessGDBRemote that is hollowed out. It is intended to be used for sending a custom packet, though the body of the command execute function has yet to be implemented! llvm-svn: 165861
2012-10-13 10:07:45 +08:00
}
Refactoring for for the internal command line completion API (NFC) Summary: This patch refactors the internal completion API. It now takes (as far as possible) a single CompletionRequest object instead o half a dozen in/out/in-out parameters. The CompletionRequest contains a common superset of the different parameters as far as it makes sense. This includes the raw command line string and raw cursor position, which should make the `expr` command possible to implement (at least without hacks that reconstruct the command line from the args). This patch is not intended to change the observable behavior of lldb in any way. It's also as minimal as possible and doesn't attempt to fix all the problems the API has. Some Q&A: Q: Why is this not fixing all the problems in the completion API? A: Because is a blocker for the expr command completion which I want to get in ASAP. This is the smallest patch that unblocks the expr completion patch and which allows trivial refactoring in the future. The patch also doesn't really change the internal information flow in the API, so that hopefully saves us from ever having to revert and resubmit this humongous patch. Q: Can we merge all the copy-pasted code in the completion methods (like computing the current incomplete arg) into CompletionRequest class? A: Yes, but it's out of scope for this patch. Q: Why the `word_complete = request.GetWordComplete(); ... ` pattern? A: I don't want to add a getter that returns a reference to the internal integer. So we have to use a temporary variable and the Getter/Setter instead. We don't throw exceptions from what I can tell, so the behavior doesn't change. Q: Why are we not owning the list of matches? A: Because that's how the previous API works. But that should be fixed too (in another patch). Q: Can we make the constructor simpler and compute some of the values from the plain command? A: I think this works, but I rather want to have this in a follow up commit. Especially when making nested request it's a bit awkward that the parsed arguments behave as both input/output (as we should in theory propagate the changes on the nested request back to the parent request if we don't want to change the behavior too much). Q: Can't we pass one const request object and then just return another result object instead of mixing them together in one in/out parameter? A: It's hard to get keep the same behavior with that pattern, but I think we can also get a nice API with just a single request object. If we make all input parameters read-only, we have a clear separation between what is actually an input and what an output parameter (and hopefully we get rid of the in-out parameters). Q: Can we throw out the 'match' variables that are not implemented according to the comment? A: We currently just forward them as in the old code to the different methods, even though I think they are really not used. We can easily remove and readd them once every single completion method just takes a CompletionRequest, but for now I prefer NFC behavior from the perspective of the API user. Reviewers: davide, jingham, labath Reviewed By: jingham Subscribers: mgorny, friss, lldb-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48796 llvm-svn: 336146
2018-07-03 05:29:56 +08:00
int CommandObjectProxy::HandleCompletion(CompletionRequest &request) {
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
CommandObject *proxy_command = GetProxyCommandObject();
if (proxy_command)
Refactoring for for the internal command line completion API (NFC) Summary: This patch refactors the internal completion API. It now takes (as far as possible) a single CompletionRequest object instead o half a dozen in/out/in-out parameters. The CompletionRequest contains a common superset of the different parameters as far as it makes sense. This includes the raw command line string and raw cursor position, which should make the `expr` command possible to implement (at least without hacks that reconstruct the command line from the args). This patch is not intended to change the observable behavior of lldb in any way. It's also as minimal as possible and doesn't attempt to fix all the problems the API has. Some Q&A: Q: Why is this not fixing all the problems in the completion API? A: Because is a blocker for the expr command completion which I want to get in ASAP. This is the smallest patch that unblocks the expr completion patch and which allows trivial refactoring in the future. The patch also doesn't really change the internal information flow in the API, so that hopefully saves us from ever having to revert and resubmit this humongous patch. Q: Can we merge all the copy-pasted code in the completion methods (like computing the current incomplete arg) into CompletionRequest class? A: Yes, but it's out of scope for this patch. Q: Why the `word_complete = request.GetWordComplete(); ... ` pattern? A: I don't want to add a getter that returns a reference to the internal integer. So we have to use a temporary variable and the Getter/Setter instead. We don't throw exceptions from what I can tell, so the behavior doesn't change. Q: Why are we not owning the list of matches? A: Because that's how the previous API works. But that should be fixed too (in another patch). Q: Can we make the constructor simpler and compute some of the values from the plain command? A: I think this works, but I rather want to have this in a follow up commit. Especially when making nested request it's a bit awkward that the parsed arguments behave as both input/output (as we should in theory propagate the changes on the nested request back to the parent request if we don't want to change the behavior too much). Q: Can't we pass one const request object and then just return another result object instead of mixing them together in one in/out parameter? A: It's hard to get keep the same behavior with that pattern, but I think we can also get a nice API with just a single request object. If we make all input parameters read-only, we have a clear separation between what is actually an input and what an output parameter (and hopefully we get rid of the in-out parameters). Q: Can we throw out the 'match' variables that are not implemented according to the comment? A: We currently just forward them as in the old code to the different methods, even though I think they are really not used. We can easily remove and readd them once every single completion method just takes a CompletionRequest, but for now I prefer NFC behavior from the perspective of the API user. Reviewers: davide, jingham, labath Reviewed By: jingham Subscribers: mgorny, friss, lldb-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48796 llvm-svn: 336146
2018-07-03 05:29:56 +08:00
return proxy_command->HandleCompletion(request);
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
return 0;
<rdar://problem/12491387> I added the ability for a process plug-in to implement custom commands. All the lldb_private::Process plug-in has to do is override: virtual CommandObject * GetPluginCommandObject(); This object returned should be a multi-word command that vends LLDB commands. There is a sample implementation in ProcessGDBRemote that is hollowed out. It is intended to be used for sending a custom packet, though the body of the command execute function has yet to be implemented! llvm-svn: 165861
2012-10-13 10:07:45 +08:00
}
Fix Clang-tidy modernize-use-nullptr and modernize-use-default warnings in some files in source/Commands; other minor fixes. llvm-svn: 261389
2016-02-20 08:58:29 +08:00
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
int CommandObjectProxy::HandleArgumentCompletion(
Refactoring for for the internal command line completion API (NFC) Summary: This patch refactors the internal completion API. It now takes (as far as possible) a single CompletionRequest object instead o half a dozen in/out/in-out parameters. The CompletionRequest contains a common superset of the different parameters as far as it makes sense. This includes the raw command line string and raw cursor position, which should make the `expr` command possible to implement (at least without hacks that reconstruct the command line from the args). This patch is not intended to change the observable behavior of lldb in any way. It's also as minimal as possible and doesn't attempt to fix all the problems the API has. Some Q&A: Q: Why is this not fixing all the problems in the completion API? A: Because is a blocker for the expr command completion which I want to get in ASAP. This is the smallest patch that unblocks the expr completion patch and which allows trivial refactoring in the future. The patch also doesn't really change the internal information flow in the API, so that hopefully saves us from ever having to revert and resubmit this humongous patch. Q: Can we merge all the copy-pasted code in the completion methods (like computing the current incomplete arg) into CompletionRequest class? A: Yes, but it's out of scope for this patch. Q: Why the `word_complete = request.GetWordComplete(); ... ` pattern? A: I don't want to add a getter that returns a reference to the internal integer. So we have to use a temporary variable and the Getter/Setter instead. We don't throw exceptions from what I can tell, so the behavior doesn't change. Q: Why are we not owning the list of matches? A: Because that's how the previous API works. But that should be fixed too (in another patch). Q: Can we make the constructor simpler and compute some of the values from the plain command? A: I think this works, but I rather want to have this in a follow up commit. Especially when making nested request it's a bit awkward that the parsed arguments behave as both input/output (as we should in theory propagate the changes on the nested request back to the parent request if we don't want to change the behavior too much). Q: Can't we pass one const request object and then just return another result object instead of mixing them together in one in/out parameter? A: It's hard to get keep the same behavior with that pattern, but I think we can also get a nice API with just a single request object. If we make all input parameters read-only, we have a clear separation between what is actually an input and what an output parameter (and hopefully we get rid of the in-out parameters). Q: Can we throw out the 'match' variables that are not implemented according to the comment? A: We currently just forward them as in the old code to the different methods, even though I think they are really not used. We can easily remove and readd them once every single completion method just takes a CompletionRequest, but for now I prefer NFC behavior from the perspective of the API user. Reviewers: davide, jingham, labath Reviewed By: jingham Subscribers: mgorny, friss, lldb-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48796 llvm-svn: 336146
2018-07-03 05:29:56 +08:00
CompletionRequest &request, OptionElementVector &opt_element_vector) {
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
CommandObject *proxy_command = GetProxyCommandObject();
if (proxy_command)
Refactoring for for the internal command line completion API (NFC) Summary: This patch refactors the internal completion API. It now takes (as far as possible) a single CompletionRequest object instead o half a dozen in/out/in-out parameters. The CompletionRequest contains a common superset of the different parameters as far as it makes sense. This includes the raw command line string and raw cursor position, which should make the `expr` command possible to implement (at least without hacks that reconstruct the command line from the args). This patch is not intended to change the observable behavior of lldb in any way. It's also as minimal as possible and doesn't attempt to fix all the problems the API has. Some Q&A: Q: Why is this not fixing all the problems in the completion API? A: Because is a blocker for the expr command completion which I want to get in ASAP. This is the smallest patch that unblocks the expr completion patch and which allows trivial refactoring in the future. The patch also doesn't really change the internal information flow in the API, so that hopefully saves us from ever having to revert and resubmit this humongous patch. Q: Can we merge all the copy-pasted code in the completion methods (like computing the current incomplete arg) into CompletionRequest class? A: Yes, but it's out of scope for this patch. Q: Why the `word_complete = request.GetWordComplete(); ... ` pattern? A: I don't want to add a getter that returns a reference to the internal integer. So we have to use a temporary variable and the Getter/Setter instead. We don't throw exceptions from what I can tell, so the behavior doesn't change. Q: Why are we not owning the list of matches? A: Because that's how the previous API works. But that should be fixed too (in another patch). Q: Can we make the constructor simpler and compute some of the values from the plain command? A: I think this works, but I rather want to have this in a follow up commit. Especially when making nested request it's a bit awkward that the parsed arguments behave as both input/output (as we should in theory propagate the changes on the nested request back to the parent request if we don't want to change the behavior too much). Q: Can't we pass one const request object and then just return another result object instead of mixing them together in one in/out parameter? A: It's hard to get keep the same behavior with that pattern, but I think we can also get a nice API with just a single request object. If we make all input parameters read-only, we have a clear separation between what is actually an input and what an output parameter (and hopefully we get rid of the in-out parameters). Q: Can we throw out the 'match' variables that are not implemented according to the comment? A: We currently just forward them as in the old code to the different methods, even though I think they are really not used. We can easily remove and readd them once every single completion method just takes a CompletionRequest, but for now I prefer NFC behavior from the perspective of the API user. Reviewers: davide, jingham, labath Reviewed By: jingham Subscribers: mgorny, friss, lldb-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48796 llvm-svn: 336146
2018-07-03 05:29:56 +08:00
return proxy_command->HandleArgumentCompletion(request, opt_element_vector);
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
return 0;
<rdar://problem/12491387> I added the ability for a process plug-in to implement custom commands. All the lldb_private::Process plug-in has to do is override: virtual CommandObject * GetPluginCommandObject(); This object returned should be a multi-word command that vends LLDB commands. There is a sample implementation in ProcessGDBRemote that is hollowed out. It is intended to be used for sending a custom packet, though the body of the command execute function has yet to be implemented! llvm-svn: 165861
2012-10-13 10:07:45 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
const char *CommandObjectProxy::GetRepeatCommand(Args &current_command_args,
uint32_t index) {
CommandObject *proxy_command = GetProxyCommandObject();
if (proxy_command)
return proxy_command->GetRepeatCommand(current_command_args, index);
return nullptr;
<rdar://problem/12491387> I added the ability for a process plug-in to implement custom commands. All the lldb_private::Process plug-in has to do is override: virtual CommandObject * GetPluginCommandObject(); This object returned should be a multi-word command that vends LLDB commands. There is a sample implementation in ProcessGDBRemote that is hollowed out. It is intended to be used for sending a custom packet, though the body of the command execute function has yet to be implemented! llvm-svn: 165861
2012-10-13 10:07:45 +08:00
}
*** This commit represents a complete reformatting of the LLDB source code *** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has *** two obvious implications: Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit, performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of the repository): find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} + find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ; The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4. Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV. llvm-svn: 280751
2016-09-07 04:57:50 +08:00
bool CommandObjectProxy::Execute(const char *args_string,
CommandReturnObject &result) {
CommandObject *proxy_command = GetProxyCommandObject();
if (proxy_command)
return proxy_command->Execute(args_string, result);
result.AppendError("command is not implemented");
result.SetStatus(eReturnStatusFailed);
return false;
<rdar://problem/12491387> I added the ability for a process plug-in to implement custom commands. All the lldb_private::Process plug-in has to do is override: virtual CommandObject * GetPluginCommandObject(); This object returned should be a multi-word command that vends LLDB commands. There is a sample implementation in ProcessGDBRemote that is hollowed out. It is intended to be used for sending a custom packet, though the body of the command execute function has yet to be implemented! llvm-svn: 165861
2012-10-13 10:07:45 +08:00
}