forked from OSchip/llvm-project
131 lines
4.9 KiB
C++
131 lines
4.9 KiB
C++
|
//===------------- EscapeAnalysis.h - Pointer escape analysis -------------===//
|
||
|
//
|
||
|
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
|
||
|
//
|
||
|
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
|
||
|
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
|
||
|
//
|
||
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
||
|
//
|
||
|
// This file provides the implementation of the pointer escape analysis.
|
||
|
//
|
||
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
||
|
|
||
|
#define DEBUG_TYPE "escape-analysis"
|
||
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/EscapeAnalysis.h"
|
||
|
#include "llvm/Module.h"
|
||
|
#include "llvm/Support/InstIterator.h"
|
||
|
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h"
|
||
|
using namespace llvm;
|
||
|
|
||
|
char EscapeAnalysis::ID = 0;
|
||
|
static RegisterPass<EscapeAnalysis> X("escape-analysis",
|
||
|
"Pointer Escape Analysis", true, true);
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
/// runOnFunction - Precomputation for escape analysis. This collects all know
|
||
|
/// "escape points" in the def-use graph of the function. These are
|
||
|
/// instructions which allow their inputs to escape from the current function.
|
||
|
bool EscapeAnalysis::runOnFunction(Function& F) {
|
||
|
EscapePoints.clear();
|
||
|
|
||
|
TargetData& TD = getAnalysis<TargetData>();
|
||
|
AliasAnalysis& AA = getAnalysis<AliasAnalysis>();
|
||
|
Module* M = F.getParent();
|
||
|
|
||
|
// Walk through all instructions in the function, identifying those that
|
||
|
// may allow their inputs to escape.
|
||
|
for(inst_iterator II = inst_begin(F), IE = inst_end(F); II != IE; ++II) {
|
||
|
Instruction* I = &*II;
|
||
|
|
||
|
// The most obvious case is stores. Any store that may write to global
|
||
|
// memory or to a function argument potentially allows its input to escape.
|
||
|
if (StoreInst* S = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(I)) {
|
||
|
const Type* StoreType = S->getOperand(0)->getType();
|
||
|
unsigned StoreSize = TD.getTypeStoreSize(StoreType);
|
||
|
Value* Pointer = S->getPointerOperand();
|
||
|
|
||
|
bool inserted = false;
|
||
|
for (Function::arg_iterator AI = F.arg_begin(), AE = F.arg_end();
|
||
|
AI != AE; ++AI) {
|
||
|
AliasAnalysis::AliasResult R = AA.alias(Pointer, StoreSize, AI, ~0UL);
|
||
|
if (R != AliasAnalysis::NoAlias) {
|
||
|
EscapePoints.insert(S);
|
||
|
inserted = true;
|
||
|
break;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
if (inserted)
|
||
|
continue;
|
||
|
|
||
|
for (Module::global_iterator GI = M->global_begin(), GE = M->global_end();
|
||
|
GI != GE; ++GI) {
|
||
|
AliasAnalysis::AliasResult R = AA.alias(Pointer, StoreSize, GI, ~0UL);
|
||
|
if (R != AliasAnalysis::NoAlias) {
|
||
|
EscapePoints.insert(S);
|
||
|
break;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
// Calls and invokes potentially allow their parameters to escape.
|
||
|
// FIXME: This can and should be refined. Intrinsics have known escape
|
||
|
// behavior, and alias analysis may be able to tell us more about callees.
|
||
|
} else if (isa<CallInst>(I) || isa<InvokeInst>(I)) {
|
||
|
EscapePoints.insert(I);
|
||
|
|
||
|
// Returns allow the return value to escape. This is mostly important
|
||
|
// for malloc to alloca promotion.
|
||
|
} else if (isa<ReturnInst>(I)) {
|
||
|
EscapePoints.insert(I);
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
// FIXME: Are there any other possible escape points?
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
return false;
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
/// escapes - Determines whether the passed allocation can escape from the
|
||
|
/// current function. It does this by using a simple worklist algorithm to
|
||
|
/// search for a path in the def-use graph from the allocation to an
|
||
|
/// escape point.
|
||
|
/// FIXME: Once we've discovered a path, it would be a good idea to memoize it,
|
||
|
/// and all of its subpaths, to amortize the cost of future queries.
|
||
|
bool EscapeAnalysis::escapes(AllocationInst* A) {
|
||
|
std::vector<Value*> worklist;
|
||
|
worklist.push_back(A);
|
||
|
|
||
|
SmallPtrSet<Value*, 8> visited;
|
||
|
while (!worklist.empty()) {
|
||
|
Value* curr = worklist.back();
|
||
|
worklist.pop_back();
|
||
|
|
||
|
visited.insert(curr);
|
||
|
|
||
|
if (Instruction* CurrInst = dyn_cast<Instruction>(curr))
|
||
|
if (EscapePoints.count(CurrInst))
|
||
|
return true;
|
||
|
|
||
|
for (Instruction::use_iterator UI = curr->use_begin(), UE = curr->use_end();
|
||
|
UI != UE; ++UI)
|
||
|
if (Instruction* U = dyn_cast<Instruction>(UI))
|
||
|
if (!visited.count(U))
|
||
|
if (StoreInst* S = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(U)) {
|
||
|
// We know this must be an instruction, because constant gep's would
|
||
|
// have been found to alias a global, so stores to them would have
|
||
|
// been in EscapePoints.
|
||
|
worklist.push_back(cast<Instruction>(S->getPointerOperand()));
|
||
|
} else if (isa<BranchInst>(U) || isa<SwitchInst>(U)) {
|
||
|
// Because branches on the pointer value can hide data dependencies,
|
||
|
// we need to track values that were generated by branching on the
|
||
|
// pointer (or some derived value). To do that, we push the block,
|
||
|
// whose uses will be the PHINodes that generate information based
|
||
|
// one it.
|
||
|
worklist.push_back(U->getParent());
|
||
|
} else
|
||
|
worklist.push_back(U);
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
return false;
|
||
|
}
|