maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/clang/test/InterfaceStubs/constructor-using-shadow.cpp

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

12 lines
300 B
C++
Raw Normal View History

[clang][IFS] Adding support for new clang interface stubs decl types. NamespaceAliasDecl UnresolvedUsingTypenameDecl CXXDeductionGuideDecl ConstructorUsingShadowDecl Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70728
2019-11-27 02:02:18 +08:00
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -o - -emit-interface-stubs %s | FileCheck %s
[ifs] Prepare llvm-ifs for elfabi/ifs merging. This diff changes llvm-ifs to use unified IFS file format and perform other renaming changes in preparation for the merging between elfabi/ifs. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99810
2021-04-08 06:50:12 +08:00
// CHECK: --- !ifs-v1
// CHECK-NEXT: IfsVersion: 3.0
// CHECK-NEXT: Target:
[clang][IFS] Adding support for new clang interface stubs decl types. NamespaceAliasDecl UnresolvedUsingTypenameDecl CXXDeductionGuideDecl ConstructorUsingShadowDecl Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70728
2019-11-27 02:02:18 +08:00
// CHECK-NEXT: Symbols:
// CHECK-NEXT: ...
[llvm][clang][IFS] Enhancing the llvm-ifs yaml format for symbol lists. Prior to this change the clang interface stubs format resembled something ending with a symbol list like this: Symbols: a: { Type: Func } This was problematic because we didn't actually want a map format and also because we didn't like that an empty symbol list required "Symbols: {}". That is to say without the empty {} llvm-ifs would crash on an empty list. With this new format it is much more clear which field is the symbol name, and instead the [] that is used to express an empty symbol vector is optional, ie: Symbols: - { Name: a, Type: Func } or Symbols: [] or Symbols: This further diverges the format from existing llvm-elftapi. This is a good thing because although the format originally came from the same place, they are not the same in any way. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76979
2020-03-28 16:08:27 +08:00
// ConstructorUsingShadowDecl
[clang][IFS] Adding support for new clang interface stubs decl types. NamespaceAliasDecl UnresolvedUsingTypenameDecl CXXDeductionGuideDecl ConstructorUsingShadowDecl Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70728
2019-11-27 02:02:18 +08:00
struct Base { Base(int); };
struct Derived : public Base { using Base::Base; };