llvm-project/lld/ELF/DWARF.cpp

130 lines
4.8 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

//===- DWARF.cpp ----------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// The -gdb-index option instructs the linker to emit a .gdb_index section.
// The section contains information to make gdb startup faster.
// The format of the section is described at
// https://sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb/Index-Section-Format.html.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "DWARF.h"
#include "Symbols.h"
#include "Target.h"
#include "lld/Common/Memory.h"
#include "llvm/DebugInfo/DWARF/DWARFDebugPubTable.h"
#include "llvm/Object/ELFObjectFile.h"
using namespace llvm;
using namespace llvm::object;
2017-03-02 06:03:17 +08:00
using namespace lld;
using namespace lld::elf;
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 13:00:37 +08:00
template <class ELFT> LLDDwarfObj<ELFT>::LLDDwarfObj(ObjFile<ELFT> *obj) {
for (InputSectionBase *sec : obj->getSections()) {
if (!sec)
continue;
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 13:00:37 +08:00
if (LLDDWARFSection *m =
StringSwitch<LLDDWARFSection *>(sec->name)
.Case(".debug_addr", &addrSection)
.Case(".debug_gnu_pubnames", &gnuPubNamesSection)
.Case(".debug_gnu_pubtypes", &gnuPubTypesSection)
.Case(".debug_info", &infoSection)
.Case(".debug_ranges", &rangeSection)
.Case(".debug_rnglists", &rngListsSection)
.Case(".debug_line", &lineSection)
.Default(nullptr)) {
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 13:00:37 +08:00
m->Data = toStringRef(sec->data());
m->sec = sec;
continue;
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 13:00:37 +08:00
if (sec->name == ".debug_abbrev")
abbrevSection = toStringRef(sec->data());
else if (sec->name == ".debug_str")
strSection = toStringRef(sec->data());
else if (sec->name == ".debug_line_str")
lineStringSection = toStringRef(sec->data());
}
}
namespace {
template <class RelTy> struct LLDRelocationResolver {
// In the ELF ABIs, S sepresents the value of the symbol in the relocation
// entry. For Rela, the addend is stored as part of the relocation entry.
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 13:00:37 +08:00
static uint64_t resolve(object::RelocationRef ref, uint64_t s,
uint64_t /* A */) {
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 13:00:37 +08:00
return s + ref.getRawDataRefImpl().p;
}
};
template <class ELFT> struct LLDRelocationResolver<Elf_Rel_Impl<ELFT, false>> {
// For Rel, the addend A is supplied by the caller.
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 13:00:37 +08:00
static uint64_t resolve(object::RelocationRef /*Ref*/, uint64_t s,
uint64_t a) {
return s + a;
}
};
} // namespace
// Find if there is a relocation at Pos in Sec. The code is a bit
// more complicated than usual because we need to pass a section index
// to llvm since it has no idea about InputSection.
template <class ELFT>
template <class RelTy>
Optional<RelocAddrEntry>
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 13:00:37 +08:00
LLDDwarfObj<ELFT>::findAux(const InputSectionBase &sec, uint64_t pos,
ArrayRef<RelTy> rels) const {
auto it =
partition_point(rels, [=](const RelTy &a) { return a.r_offset < pos; });
if (it == rels.end() || it->r_offset != pos)
return None;
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 13:00:37 +08:00
const RelTy &rel = *it;
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 13:00:37 +08:00
const ObjFile<ELFT> *file = sec.getFile<ELFT>();
uint32_t symIndex = rel.getSymbol(config->isMips64EL);
const typename ELFT::Sym &sym = file->template getELFSyms<ELFT>()[symIndex];
uint32_t secIndex = file->getSectionIndex(sym);
Reland D61583 [ELF] Error on relocations to STT_SECTION symbols if the sections were discarded This restores r361830 "[ELF] Error on relocations to STT_SECTION symbols if the sections were discarded" and dependent commits (r362218, r362497) which were reverted by r364321, with a fix of a --gdb-index issue. .rela.debug_ranges contains relocations of range list entries: // start address of a range list entry // old: 0; after r361830: 0 00000000000033a0 R_X86_64_64 .text._ZN2v88internal7Isolate7factoryEv + 0 // end address of a range list entry // old: 0xe; after r361830: 0 00000000000033a8 R_X86_64_64 .text._ZN2v88internal7Isolate7factoryEv + e If both start and end addresses of a range list entry resolve to 0, DWARFDebugRangeList::isEndOfListEntry() will return true, then the .debug_range decoding loop will terminate prematurely: while (true) { decode StartAddress decode EndAddress if (Entry.isEndOfListEntry()) // prematurely break; Entries.push_back(Entry); } In lld/ELF/SyntheticSections.cpp, readAddressAreas() will read incomplete address ranges and the resulting .gdb_index will be incomplete. For files that gdb hasn't loaded their debug info, gdb uses .gdb_index to map addresses to CUs. The absent entries make gdb fail to symbolize some addresses. To address this issue, we simply allow relocations to undefined symbols in DWARF.cpp:findAux() and let RelocationResolver resolve them. This patch should fix: [1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190603/659848.html [2] https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=978067 llvm-svn: 364391
2019-06-26 16:09:08 +08:00
// An undefined symbol may be a symbol defined in a discarded section. We
// shall still resolve it. This is important for --gdb-index: the end address
// offset of an entry in .debug_ranges is relocated. If it is not resolved,
// its zero value will terminate the decoding of .debug_ranges prematurely.
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 13:00:37 +08:00
Symbol &s = file->getRelocTargetSym(rel);
uint64_t val = 0;
if (auto *dr = dyn_cast<Defined>(&s)) {
val = dr->value;
Reland D61583 [ELF] Error on relocations to STT_SECTION symbols if the sections were discarded This restores r361830 "[ELF] Error on relocations to STT_SECTION symbols if the sections were discarded" and dependent commits (r362218, r362497) which were reverted by r364321, with a fix of a --gdb-index issue. .rela.debug_ranges contains relocations of range list entries: // start address of a range list entry // old: 0; after r361830: 0 00000000000033a0 R_X86_64_64 .text._ZN2v88internal7Isolate7factoryEv + 0 // end address of a range list entry // old: 0xe; after r361830: 0 00000000000033a8 R_X86_64_64 .text._ZN2v88internal7Isolate7factoryEv + e If both start and end addresses of a range list entry resolve to 0, DWARFDebugRangeList::isEndOfListEntry() will return true, then the .debug_range decoding loop will terminate prematurely: while (true) { decode StartAddress decode EndAddress if (Entry.isEndOfListEntry()) // prematurely break; Entries.push_back(Entry); } In lld/ELF/SyntheticSections.cpp, readAddressAreas() will read incomplete address ranges and the resulting .gdb_index will be incomplete. For files that gdb hasn't loaded their debug info, gdb uses .gdb_index to map addresses to CUs. The absent entries make gdb fail to symbolize some addresses. To address this issue, we simply allow relocations to undefined symbols in DWARF.cpp:findAux() and let RelocationResolver resolve them. This patch should fix: [1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190603/659848.html [2] https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=978067 llvm-svn: 364391
2019-06-26 16:09:08 +08:00
// FIXME: We should be consistent about always adding the file
// offset or not.
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 13:00:37 +08:00
if (dr->section->flags & ELF::SHF_ALLOC)
val += cast<InputSection>(dr->section)->getOffsetInFile();
Reland D61583 [ELF] Error on relocations to STT_SECTION symbols if the sections were discarded This restores r361830 "[ELF] Error on relocations to STT_SECTION symbols if the sections were discarded" and dependent commits (r362218, r362497) which were reverted by r364321, with a fix of a --gdb-index issue. .rela.debug_ranges contains relocations of range list entries: // start address of a range list entry // old: 0; after r361830: 0 00000000000033a0 R_X86_64_64 .text._ZN2v88internal7Isolate7factoryEv + 0 // end address of a range list entry // old: 0xe; after r361830: 0 00000000000033a8 R_X86_64_64 .text._ZN2v88internal7Isolate7factoryEv + e If both start and end addresses of a range list entry resolve to 0, DWARFDebugRangeList::isEndOfListEntry() will return true, then the .debug_range decoding loop will terminate prematurely: while (true) { decode StartAddress decode EndAddress if (Entry.isEndOfListEntry()) // prematurely break; Entries.push_back(Entry); } In lld/ELF/SyntheticSections.cpp, readAddressAreas() will read incomplete address ranges and the resulting .gdb_index will be incomplete. For files that gdb hasn't loaded their debug info, gdb uses .gdb_index to map addresses to CUs. The absent entries make gdb fail to symbolize some addresses. To address this issue, we simply allow relocations to undefined symbols in DWARF.cpp:findAux() and let RelocationResolver resolve them. This patch should fix: [1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20190603/659848.html [2] https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=978067 llvm-svn: 364391
2019-06-26 16:09:08 +08:00
}
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 13:00:37 +08:00
DataRefImpl d;
d.p = getAddend<ELFT>(rel);
return RelocAddrEntry{secIndex, RelocationRef(d, nullptr),
val, Optional<object::RelocationRef>(),
0, LLDRelocationResolver<RelTy>::resolve};
}
template <class ELFT>
[Coding style change] Rename variables so that they start with a lowercase letter This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against lld's code base. Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style: https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable naming scheme change, and this patch does that. I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter. Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But there's a remedy. clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to a commit after the mass renaming: 1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming, 2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and 3. rebase again to the head. Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by hand, but that shouldn't be too many. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121 llvm-svn: 365595
2019-07-10 13:00:37 +08:00
Optional<RelocAddrEntry> LLDDwarfObj<ELFT>::find(const llvm::DWARFSection &s,
uint64_t pos) const {
auto &sec = static_cast<const LLDDWARFSection &>(s);
if (sec.sec->areRelocsRela)
return findAux(*sec.sec, pos, sec.sec->template relas<ELFT>());
return findAux(*sec.sec, pos, sec.sec->template rels<ELFT>());
}
template class elf::LLDDwarfObj<ELF32LE>;
template class elf::LLDDwarfObj<ELF32BE>;
template class elf::LLDDwarfObj<ELF64LE>;
template class elf::LLDDwarfObj<ELF64BE>;