forked from OSchip/llvm-project
42 lines
1.2 KiB
C
42 lines
1.2 KiB
C
|
// Test that misexpect detects mis-annotated switch statements
|
||
|
|
||
|
// RUN: llvm-profdata merge %S/Inputs/misexpect-switch.proftext -o %t.profdata
|
||
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -O2 -o - -emit-llvm -fprofile-instrument-use-path=%t.profdata -verify -Wmisexpect -debug-info-kind=line-tables-only
|
||
|
|
||
|
int sum(int *buff, int size);
|
||
|
int random_sample(int *buff, int size);
|
||
|
int rand();
|
||
|
void init_arry();
|
||
|
|
||
|
const int inner_loop = 1000;
|
||
|
const int outer_loop = 20;
|
||
|
const int arry_size = 25;
|
||
|
|
||
|
int arry[arry_size] = {0};
|
||
|
|
||
|
int main() {
|
||
|
init_arry();
|
||
|
int val = 0;
|
||
|
|
||
|
int j, k;
|
||
|
for (j = 0; j < outer_loop; ++j) {
|
||
|
for (k = 0; k < inner_loop; ++k) {
|
||
|
unsigned condition = rand() % 10000;
|
||
|
switch (__builtin_expect(condition, 0)) { // expected-warning-re {{Potential performance regression from use of __builtin_expect(): Annotation was correct on {{.+}}% ({{[0-9]+ / [0-9]+}}) of profiled executions.}}
|
||
|
case 0:
|
||
|
val += sum(arry, arry_size);
|
||
|
break;
|
||
|
case 1:
|
||
|
case 2:
|
||
|
case 3:
|
||
|
break;
|
||
|
default:
|
||
|
val += random_sample(arry, arry_size);
|
||
|
break;
|
||
|
} // end switch
|
||
|
} // end inner_loop
|
||
|
} // end outer_loop
|
||
|
|
||
|
return 0;
|
||
|
}
|