maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/clang/test/Driver/thinlto_backend.c

11 lines
586 B
C
Raw Normal View History

Remove target specifier from new tests Hopefully fix the remaining bot failure from r254927. Remove target specification since it shouldn't be needed, and this causes an error when trying to check the pass execution structure in test/CodeGen/thinlto_backend.c on non-x86 arches. llvm-svn: 254940
2015-12-08 04:40:36 +08:00
// RUN: %clang -O2 %s -flto=thin -c -o %t.o
[ThinLTO] Option to invoke ThinLTO backend passes and importing Summary: Adds new option -fthinlto-index=<file> to invoke the LTO pipeline along with function importing via clang using the supplied function summary index file. This supports invoking the parallel ThinLTO backend processes in a distributed build environment via clang. Additionally, this causes the module linker to be invoked on the bitcode file being compiled to perform any necessary promotion and renaming of locals that are exported via the function summary index file. Add a couple tests that confirm we get expected errors when we try to use the new option on a file that isn't bitcode, or specify an invalid index file. The tests also confirm that we trigger the expected function import pass. Depends on D15024 Reviewers: joker.eph, dexonsmith Subscribers: joker.eph, davidxl, cfe-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15025 llvm-svn: 254927
2015-12-08 03:21:34 +08:00
// RUN: llvm-lto -thinlto -o %t %t.o
// -fthinlto_index should be passed to cc1
Remove target specifier from new tests Hopefully fix the remaining bot failure from r254927. Remove target specification since it shouldn't be needed, and this causes an error when trying to check the pass execution structure in test/CodeGen/thinlto_backend.c on non-x86 arches. llvm-svn: 254940
2015-12-08 04:40:36 +08:00
// RUN: %clang -O2 -o %t1.o -x ir %t.o -c -fthinlto-index=%t.thinlto.bc -### 2>&1 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-THINLTOBE-ACTION
[ThinLTO] Option to invoke ThinLTO backend passes and importing Summary: Adds new option -fthinlto-index=<file> to invoke the LTO pipeline along with function importing via clang using the supplied function summary index file. This supports invoking the parallel ThinLTO backend processes in a distributed build environment via clang. Additionally, this causes the module linker to be invoked on the bitcode file being compiled to perform any necessary promotion and renaming of locals that are exported via the function summary index file. Add a couple tests that confirm we get expected errors when we try to use the new option on a file that isn't bitcode, or specify an invalid index file. The tests also confirm that we trigger the expected function import pass. Depends on D15024 Reviewers: joker.eph, dexonsmith Subscribers: joker.eph, davidxl, cfe-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15025 llvm-svn: 254927
2015-12-08 03:21:34 +08:00
// CHECK-THINLTOBE-ACTION: -fthinlto-index=
// Ensure clang driver gives the expected error for incorrect input type
Remove target specifier from new tests Hopefully fix the remaining bot failure from r254927. Remove target specification since it shouldn't be needed, and this causes an error when trying to check the pass execution structure in test/CodeGen/thinlto_backend.c on non-x86 arches. llvm-svn: 254940
2015-12-08 04:40:36 +08:00
// RUN: not %clang -O2 -o %t1.o %s -c -fthinlto-index=%t.thinlto.bc 2>&1 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-WARNING
[ThinLTO] Option to invoke ThinLTO backend passes and importing Summary: Adds new option -fthinlto-index=<file> to invoke the LTO pipeline along with function importing via clang using the supplied function summary index file. This supports invoking the parallel ThinLTO backend processes in a distributed build environment via clang. Additionally, this causes the module linker to be invoked on the bitcode file being compiled to perform any necessary promotion and renaming of locals that are exported via the function summary index file. Add a couple tests that confirm we get expected errors when we try to use the new option on a file that isn't bitcode, or specify an invalid index file. The tests also confirm that we trigger the expected function import pass. Depends on D15024 Reviewers: joker.eph, dexonsmith Subscribers: joker.eph, davidxl, cfe-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15025 llvm-svn: 254927
2015-12-08 03:21:34 +08:00
// CHECK-WARNING: error: invalid argument '-fthinlto-index={{.*}}' only allowed with '-x ir'