maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/unaligned-member-qualifier.cpp

21 lines
666 B
C++
Raw Normal View History

Mangle __unaligned in Itanium ABI __unaligned is not currently mangled in any way in the Itanium ABI. This causes failures when using -fms-extensions and C++ in targets using Itanium ABI. As suggested by @rsmith the simplest thing to do here is actually mangle the qualifier as a vendor extension. This patch also removes the change done in D31976 and updates its test to the new reality. This fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33080 https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33178 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33398 llvm-svn: 304523
2017-06-02 15:14:34 +08:00
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple %itanium_abi_triple -fms-extensions -emit-llvm %s -o- | FileCheck %s
struct A {
void foo() __unaligned;
void foo() const __unaligned;
void foo() volatile __unaligned;
void foo() const volatile __unaligned;
};
void A::foo() __unaligned {}
clang/test/CodeGenCXX/unaligned-member-qualifier.cpp: Satisfy x86_thiscallcc. llvm-svn: 304535
2017-06-02 17:53:05 +08:00
// CHECK: define [[THISCALL:(x86_thiscallcc )?]]void @_ZNU11__unaligned1A3fooEv(
Mangle __unaligned in Itanium ABI __unaligned is not currently mangled in any way in the Itanium ABI. This causes failures when using -fms-extensions and C++ in targets using Itanium ABI. As suggested by @rsmith the simplest thing to do here is actually mangle the qualifier as a vendor extension. This patch also removes the change done in D31976 and updates its test to the new reality. This fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33080 https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33178 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33398 llvm-svn: 304523
2017-06-02 15:14:34 +08:00
void A::foo() const __unaligned {}
clang/test/CodeGenCXX/unaligned-member-qualifier.cpp: Satisfy x86_thiscallcc. llvm-svn: 304535
2017-06-02 17:53:05 +08:00
// CHECK: define [[THISCALL]]void @_ZNU11__unalignedK1A3fooEv(
Mangle __unaligned in Itanium ABI __unaligned is not currently mangled in any way in the Itanium ABI. This causes failures when using -fms-extensions and C++ in targets using Itanium ABI. As suggested by @rsmith the simplest thing to do here is actually mangle the qualifier as a vendor extension. This patch also removes the change done in D31976 and updates its test to the new reality. This fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33080 https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33178 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33398 llvm-svn: 304523
2017-06-02 15:14:34 +08:00
void A::foo() volatile __unaligned {}
clang/test/CodeGenCXX/unaligned-member-qualifier.cpp: Satisfy x86_thiscallcc. llvm-svn: 304535
2017-06-02 17:53:05 +08:00
// CHECK: define [[THISCALL]]void @_ZNU11__unalignedV1A3fooEv(
Mangle __unaligned in Itanium ABI __unaligned is not currently mangled in any way in the Itanium ABI. This causes failures when using -fms-extensions and C++ in targets using Itanium ABI. As suggested by @rsmith the simplest thing to do here is actually mangle the qualifier as a vendor extension. This patch also removes the change done in D31976 and updates its test to the new reality. This fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33080 https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33178 Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33398 llvm-svn: 304523
2017-06-02 15:14:34 +08:00
void A::foo() const volatile __unaligned {}
clang/test/CodeGenCXX/unaligned-member-qualifier.cpp: Satisfy x86_thiscallcc. llvm-svn: 304535
2017-06-02 17:53:05 +08:00
// CHECK: define [[THISCALL]]void @_ZNU11__unalignedVK1A3fooEv(