2018-08-15 00:03:32 +08:00
|
|
|
//===--- TestTU.h - Scratch source files for testing -------------*- C++-*-===//
|
[clangd] Extract scoring/ranking logic, and shave yaks.
Summary:
Code completion scoring was embedded in CodeComplete.cpp, which is bad:
- awkward to test. The mechanisms (extracting info from index/sema) can be
unit-tested well, the policy (scoring) should be quantitatively measured.
Neither was easily possible, and debugging was hard.
The intermediate signal struct makes this easier.
- hard to reuse. This is a bug in workspaceSymbols: it just presents the
results in the index order, which is not sorted in practice, it needs to rank
them!
Also, index implementations care about scoring (both query-dependent and
independent) in order to truncate result lists appropriately.
The main yak shaved here is the build() function that had 3 variants across
unit tests is unified in TestTU.h (rather than adding a 4th variant).
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: klimek, mgorny, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46524
llvm-svn: 332378
2018-05-16 01:43:27 +08:00
|
|
|
//
|
2019-01-19 16:50:56 +08:00
|
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
[clangd] Extract scoring/ranking logic, and shave yaks.
Summary:
Code completion scoring was embedded in CodeComplete.cpp, which is bad:
- awkward to test. The mechanisms (extracting info from index/sema) can be
unit-tested well, the policy (scoring) should be quantitatively measured.
Neither was easily possible, and debugging was hard.
The intermediate signal struct makes this easier.
- hard to reuse. This is a bug in workspaceSymbols: it just presents the
results in the index order, which is not sorted in practice, it needs to rank
them!
Also, index implementations care about scoring (both query-dependent and
independent) in order to truncate result lists appropriately.
The main yak shaved here is the build() function that had 3 variants across
unit tests is unified in TestTU.h (rather than adding a 4th variant).
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: klimek, mgorny, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46524
llvm-svn: 332378
2018-05-16 01:43:27 +08:00
|
|
|
//
|
2018-08-15 00:03:32 +08:00
|
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
[clangd] Extract scoring/ranking logic, and shave yaks.
Summary:
Code completion scoring was embedded in CodeComplete.cpp, which is bad:
- awkward to test. The mechanisms (extracting info from index/sema) can be
unit-tested well, the policy (scoring) should be quantitatively measured.
Neither was easily possible, and debugging was hard.
The intermediate signal struct makes this easier.
- hard to reuse. This is a bug in workspaceSymbols: it just presents the
results in the index order, which is not sorted in practice, it needs to rank
them!
Also, index implementations care about scoring (both query-dependent and
independent) in order to truncate result lists appropriately.
The main yak shaved here is the build() function that had 3 variants across
unit tests is unified in TestTU.h (rather than adding a 4th variant).
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: klimek, mgorny, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46524
llvm-svn: 332378
2018-05-16 01:43:27 +08:00
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// Many tests for indexing, code completion etc are most naturally expressed
|
|
|
|
// using code examples.
|
|
|
|
// TestTU lets test define these examples in a common way without dealing with
|
|
|
|
// the mechanics of VFS and compiler interactions, and then easily grab the
|
|
|
|
// AST, particular symbols, etc.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
//===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
2018-08-15 00:03:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
[clangd] Extract scoring/ranking logic, and shave yaks.
Summary:
Code completion scoring was embedded in CodeComplete.cpp, which is bad:
- awkward to test. The mechanisms (extracting info from index/sema) can be
unit-tested well, the policy (scoring) should be quantitatively measured.
Neither was easily possible, and debugging was hard.
The intermediate signal struct makes this easier.
- hard to reuse. This is a bug in workspaceSymbols: it just presents the
results in the index order, which is not sorted in practice, it needs to rank
them!
Also, index implementations care about scoring (both query-dependent and
independent) in order to truncate result lists appropriately.
The main yak shaved here is the build() function that had 3 variants across
unit tests is unified in TestTU.h (rather than adding a 4th variant).
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: klimek, mgorny, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46524
llvm-svn: 332378
2018-05-16 01:43:27 +08:00
|
|
|
#ifndef LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_UNITTESTS_CLANGD_TESTTU_H
|
|
|
|
#define LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_UNITTESTS_CLANGD_TESTTU_H
|
2018-08-15 00:03:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-04-01 05:09:28 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "Compiler.h"
|
2019-09-04 17:46:06 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "ParsedAST.h"
|
2019-04-29 18:25:44 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "Path.h"
|
[clangd] Extract scoring/ranking logic, and shave yaks.
Summary:
Code completion scoring was embedded in CodeComplete.cpp, which is bad:
- awkward to test. The mechanisms (extracting info from index/sema) can be
unit-tested well, the policy (scoring) should be quantitatively measured.
Neither was easily possible, and debugging was hard.
The intermediate signal struct makes this easier.
- hard to reuse. This is a bug in workspaceSymbols: it just presents the
results in the index order, which is not sorted in practice, it needs to rank
them!
Also, index implementations care about scoring (both query-dependent and
independent) in order to truncate result lists appropriately.
The main yak shaved here is the build() function that had 3 variants across
unit tests is unified in TestTU.h (rather than adding a 4th variant).
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: klimek, mgorny, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46524
llvm-svn: 332378
2018-05-16 01:43:27 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "index/Index.h"
|
2019-04-29 18:25:44 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "llvm/ADT/StringMap.h"
|
[clangd] Extract scoring/ranking logic, and shave yaks.
Summary:
Code completion scoring was embedded in CodeComplete.cpp, which is bad:
- awkward to test. The mechanisms (extracting info from index/sema) can be
unit-tested well, the policy (scoring) should be quantitatively measured.
Neither was easily possible, and debugging was hard.
The intermediate signal struct makes this easier.
- hard to reuse. This is a bug in workspaceSymbols: it just presents the
results in the index order, which is not sorted in practice, it needs to rank
them!
Also, index implementations care about scoring (both query-dependent and
independent) in order to truncate result lists appropriately.
The main yak shaved here is the build() function that had 3 variants across
unit tests is unified in TestTU.h (rather than adding a 4th variant).
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: klimek, mgorny, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46524
llvm-svn: 332378
2018-05-16 01:43:27 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "gtest/gtest.h"
|
2019-04-29 18:25:44 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <string>
|
|
|
|
#include <utility>
|
|
|
|
#include <vector>
|
[clangd] Extract scoring/ranking logic, and shave yaks.
Summary:
Code completion scoring was embedded in CodeComplete.cpp, which is bad:
- awkward to test. The mechanisms (extracting info from index/sema) can be
unit-tested well, the policy (scoring) should be quantitatively measured.
Neither was easily possible, and debugging was hard.
The intermediate signal struct makes this easier.
- hard to reuse. This is a bug in workspaceSymbols: it just presents the
results in the index order, which is not sorted in practice, it needs to rank
them!
Also, index implementations care about scoring (both query-dependent and
independent) in order to truncate result lists appropriately.
The main yak shaved here is the build() function that had 3 variants across
unit tests is unified in TestTU.h (rather than adding a 4th variant).
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: klimek, mgorny, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46524
llvm-svn: 332378
2018-05-16 01:43:27 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
namespace clang {
|
|
|
|
namespace clangd {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct TestTU {
|
|
|
|
static TestTU withCode(llvm::StringRef Code) {
|
|
|
|
TestTU TU;
|
2020-01-29 03:23:46 +08:00
|
|
|
TU.Code = std::string(Code);
|
[clangd] Extract scoring/ranking logic, and shave yaks.
Summary:
Code completion scoring was embedded in CodeComplete.cpp, which is bad:
- awkward to test. The mechanisms (extracting info from index/sema) can be
unit-tested well, the policy (scoring) should be quantitatively measured.
Neither was easily possible, and debugging was hard.
The intermediate signal struct makes this easier.
- hard to reuse. This is a bug in workspaceSymbols: it just presents the
results in the index order, which is not sorted in practice, it needs to rank
them!
Also, index implementations care about scoring (both query-dependent and
independent) in order to truncate result lists appropriately.
The main yak shaved here is the build() function that had 3 variants across
unit tests is unified in TestTU.h (rather than adding a 4th variant).
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: klimek, mgorny, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46524
llvm-svn: 332378
2018-05-16 01:43:27 +08:00
|
|
|
return TU;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static TestTU withHeaderCode(llvm::StringRef HeaderCode) {
|
|
|
|
TestTU TU;
|
2020-01-29 03:23:46 +08:00
|
|
|
TU.HeaderCode = std::string(HeaderCode);
|
[clangd] Extract scoring/ranking logic, and shave yaks.
Summary:
Code completion scoring was embedded in CodeComplete.cpp, which is bad:
- awkward to test. The mechanisms (extracting info from index/sema) can be
unit-tested well, the policy (scoring) should be quantitatively measured.
Neither was easily possible, and debugging was hard.
The intermediate signal struct makes this easier.
- hard to reuse. This is a bug in workspaceSymbols: it just presents the
results in the index order, which is not sorted in practice, it needs to rank
them!
Also, index implementations care about scoring (both query-dependent and
independent) in order to truncate result lists appropriately.
The main yak shaved here is the build() function that had 3 variants across
unit tests is unified in TestTU.h (rather than adding a 4th variant).
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: klimek, mgorny, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46524
llvm-svn: 332378
2018-05-16 01:43:27 +08:00
|
|
|
return TU;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// The code to be compiled.
|
|
|
|
std::string Code;
|
|
|
|
std::string Filename = "TestTU.cpp";
|
|
|
|
|
2018-06-05 20:22:43 +08:00
|
|
|
// Define contents of a header which will be implicitly included by Code.
|
[clangd] Extract scoring/ranking logic, and shave yaks.
Summary:
Code completion scoring was embedded in CodeComplete.cpp, which is bad:
- awkward to test. The mechanisms (extracting info from index/sema) can be
unit-tested well, the policy (scoring) should be quantitatively measured.
Neither was easily possible, and debugging was hard.
The intermediate signal struct makes this easier.
- hard to reuse. This is a bug in workspaceSymbols: it just presents the
results in the index order, which is not sorted in practice, it needs to rank
them!
Also, index implementations care about scoring (both query-dependent and
independent) in order to truncate result lists appropriately.
The main yak shaved here is the build() function that had 3 variants across
unit tests is unified in TestTU.h (rather than adding a 4th variant).
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: klimek, mgorny, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46524
llvm-svn: 332378
2018-05-16 01:43:27 +08:00
|
|
|
std::string HeaderCode;
|
|
|
|
std::string HeaderFilename = "TestTU.h";
|
|
|
|
|
2019-04-29 18:25:44 +08:00
|
|
|
// Name and contents of each file.
|
|
|
|
llvm::StringMap<std::string> AdditionalFiles;
|
|
|
|
|
2018-07-03 00:28:34 +08:00
|
|
|
// Extra arguments for the compiler invocation.
|
2020-04-01 05:09:28 +08:00
|
|
|
std::vector<std::string> ExtraArgs;
|
2018-07-03 00:28:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-01-22 17:39:05 +08:00
|
|
|
llvm::Optional<std::string> ClangTidyChecks;
|
2019-05-19 12:19:14 +08:00
|
|
|
llvm::Optional<std::string> ClangTidyWarningsAsErrors;
|
2019-01-28 22:01:55 +08:00
|
|
|
// Index to use when building AST.
|
|
|
|
const SymbolIndex *ExternalIndex = nullptr;
|
2019-01-22 17:39:05 +08:00
|
|
|
|
[clangd] Include insertion: require header guards, drop other heuristics, treat .def like .inc.
Summary:
We do have some reports of include insertion behaving badly in some
codebases. Requiring header guards both makes sense in principle, and is
likely to disable this "nice-to-have" feature in codebases where headers don't
follow the expected pattern.
With this we can drop some other heuristics, such as looking at file
extensions to detect known non-headers - implementation files have no guards.
One wrinkle here is #import - objc headers may not have guards because
they're intended to be used via #import. If the header is the main file
or is #included, we won't collect locations - merge should take care of
this if we see the file #imported somewhere. Seems likely to be OK.
Headers which have a canonicalization (stdlib, IWYU) are exempt from this check.
*.inc files continue to be handled by looking up to the including file.
This patch also adds *.def here - tablegen wants this pattern too.
In terms of code structure, the division between SymbolCollector and
CanonicalIncludes has shifted: SymbolCollector is responsible for more.
This is because SymbolCollector has all the SourceManager/HeaderSearch access
needed for checking for guards, and we interleave these checks with the *.def
checks in a loop (potentially).
We could hand all the info into CanonicalIncludes and put the logic there
if that's preferable.
Reviewers: ioeric
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60316
llvm-svn: 358571
2019-04-17 18:36:02 +08:00
|
|
|
// Simulate a header guard of the header (using an #import directive).
|
|
|
|
bool ImplicitHeaderGuard = true;
|
|
|
|
|
[clangd] Errors in TestTU cause test failures unless suppressed with error-ok.
Summary:
The historic behavior of TestTU is to gather diagnostics and otherwise ignore
them. So if a test has a syntax error, and doesn't assert diagnostics, it
silently misbehaves.
This can be annoying when developing tests, as evidenced by various tests
gaining "assert no diagnostics" where that's not really the point of the test.
This patch aims to make that default behavior. For the first error
(not warning), TestTU will call ADD_FAILURE().
This can be suppressed with a comment containing "error-ok". For now that will
suppress any errors in the TU. We can make this stricter later -verify style.
(-verify itself is hard to reuse because of DiagnosticConsumer interfaces...)
A magic-comment was chosen over a TestTU option because of table-driven tests.
In addition to the behavior change, this patch:
- adds //error-ok where we're knowingly testing invalid code
(e.g. for diagnostics, crash-resilience, or token-level tests)
- fixes a bunch of errors in the checked-in tests, mostly trivial (missing ;)
- removes a bunch of now-redundant instances of "assert no diagnostics"
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73199
2020-01-22 23:38:41 +08:00
|
|
|
// By default, build() will report Error diagnostics as GTest errors.
|
|
|
|
// Suppress this behavior by adding an 'error-ok' comment to the code.
|
[clangd] Extract scoring/ranking logic, and shave yaks.
Summary:
Code completion scoring was embedded in CodeComplete.cpp, which is bad:
- awkward to test. The mechanisms (extracting info from index/sema) can be
unit-tested well, the policy (scoring) should be quantitatively measured.
Neither was easily possible, and debugging was hard.
The intermediate signal struct makes this easier.
- hard to reuse. This is a bug in workspaceSymbols: it just presents the
results in the index order, which is not sorted in practice, it needs to rank
them!
Also, index implementations care about scoring (both query-dependent and
independent) in order to truncate result lists appropriately.
The main yak shaved here is the build() function that had 3 variants across
unit tests is unified in TestTU.h (rather than adding a 4th variant).
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: klimek, mgorny, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46524
llvm-svn: 332378
2018-05-16 01:43:27 +08:00
|
|
|
ParsedAST build() const;
|
2020-04-01 05:09:28 +08:00
|
|
|
ParseInputs inputs() const;
|
[clangd] Extract scoring/ranking logic, and shave yaks.
Summary:
Code completion scoring was embedded in CodeComplete.cpp, which is bad:
- awkward to test. The mechanisms (extracting info from index/sema) can be
unit-tested well, the policy (scoring) should be quantitatively measured.
Neither was easily possible, and debugging was hard.
The intermediate signal struct makes this easier.
- hard to reuse. This is a bug in workspaceSymbols: it just presents the
results in the index order, which is not sorted in practice, it needs to rank
them!
Also, index implementations care about scoring (both query-dependent and
independent) in order to truncate result lists appropriately.
The main yak shaved here is the build() function that had 3 variants across
unit tests is unified in TestTU.h (rather than adding a 4th variant).
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: klimek, mgorny, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46524
llvm-svn: 332378
2018-05-16 01:43:27 +08:00
|
|
|
SymbolSlab headerSymbols() const;
|
|
|
|
std::unique_ptr<SymbolIndex> index() const;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Look up an index symbol by qualified name, which must be unique.
|
|
|
|
const Symbol &findSymbol(const SymbolSlab &, llvm::StringRef QName);
|
|
|
|
// Look up an AST symbol by qualified name, which must be unique and top-level.
|
|
|
|
const NamedDecl &findDecl(ParsedAST &AST, llvm::StringRef QName);
|
2018-11-09 20:56:49 +08:00
|
|
|
// Look up an AST symbol that satisfies \p Filter.
|
|
|
|
const NamedDecl &findDecl(ParsedAST &AST,
|
|
|
|
std::function<bool(const NamedDecl &)> Filter);
|
|
|
|
// Look up an AST symbol by unqualified name, which must be unique.
|
|
|
|
const NamedDecl &findUnqualifiedDecl(ParsedAST &AST, llvm::StringRef Name);
|
[clangd] Extract scoring/ranking logic, and shave yaks.
Summary:
Code completion scoring was embedded in CodeComplete.cpp, which is bad:
- awkward to test. The mechanisms (extracting info from index/sema) can be
unit-tested well, the policy (scoring) should be quantitatively measured.
Neither was easily possible, and debugging was hard.
The intermediate signal struct makes this easier.
- hard to reuse. This is a bug in workspaceSymbols: it just presents the
results in the index order, which is not sorted in practice, it needs to rank
them!
Also, index implementations care about scoring (both query-dependent and
independent) in order to truncate result lists appropriately.
The main yak shaved here is the build() function that had 3 variants across
unit tests is unified in TestTU.h (rather than adding a 4th variant).
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: klimek, mgorny, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, mgrang, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46524
llvm-svn: 332378
2018-05-16 01:43:27 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
} // namespace clangd
|
|
|
|
} // namespace clang
|
2018-08-15 00:03:32 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#endif // LLVM_CLANG_TOOLS_EXTRA_UNITTESTS_CLANGD_TESTTU_H
|