llvm-project/llvm/test/tools/llvm-mc/basic.test

# RUN: not llvm-mc %t.blah -o %t2 2>&1 | FileCheck --check-prefix=ENOENT %s

# ENOENT: {{.*}}.blah: {{[Nn]}}o such file or directory
[llvm-mc] Better error handling in ENOENT case + test. This is a follow up to r247518. As a general note, I think we could do a much better job testing for error conditions in tools. I already anticipated in a previous mail, but while implementing this I noticed that the code coverage we have for error checking is pretty low. I can arbitrarily remove checks from several tools and the suite still passes. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12846 llvm-svn: 247582 2015-09-15 01:10:01 +08:00			`# RUN: not llvm-mc %t.blah -o %t2 2>&1 \| FileCheck --check-prefix=ENOENT %s`
test: Add "REQUIRES: native" so this test passes with no default triple configured llvm-svn: 247719 2015-09-16 05:13:33 +08:00
[llvm-mc] Better error handling in ENOENT case + test. This is a follow up to r247518. As a general note, I think we could do a much better job testing for error conditions in tools. I already anticipated in a previous mail, but while implementing this I noticed that the code coverage we have for error checking is pretty low. I can arbitrarily remove checks from several tools and the suite still passes. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12846 llvm-svn: 247582 2015-09-15 01:10:01 +08:00			`# ENOENT: {{.*}}.blah: {{[Nn]}}o such file or directory`