2010-05-12 03:42:16 +08:00
|
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
//
|
2019-01-19 18:56:40 +08:00
|
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
2010-05-12 03:42:16 +08:00
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
|
2020-10-10 03:31:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// UNSUPPORTED: libcpp-has-no-localization
|
|
|
|
|
2010-05-12 03:42:16 +08:00
|
|
|
// <complex>
|
|
|
|
|
2010-08-22 08:42:21 +08:00
|
|
|
// template<class T, class charT, class traits>
|
|
|
|
// basic_ostream<charT, traits>&
|
2010-05-12 03:42:16 +08:00
|
|
|
// operator<<(basic_ostream<charT, traits>& o, const complex<T>& x);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <complex>
|
|
|
|
#include <sstream>
|
|
|
|
#include <cassert>
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-01 02:35:30 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "test_macros.h"
|
|
|
|
|
2020-10-17 02:19:39 +08:00
|
|
|
int main(int, char**) {
|
|
|
|
// Basic test
|
2020-05-08 01:49:12 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2020-10-17 02:19:39 +08:00
|
|
|
std::complex<double> const c(1, 2);
|
2020-05-08 01:49:12 +08:00
|
|
|
std::ostringstream os;
|
|
|
|
os << c;
|
|
|
|
assert(os.str() == "(1,2)");
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-10-17 02:19:39 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Test with various widths.
|
|
|
|
// In particular, make sure the width() is 0 after the operation, which
|
|
|
|
// should be the case because [complex.ops] says about operator<< for complex:
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// Effects: Inserts the complex number x onto the stream o as if it
|
|
|
|
// were implemented as follows:
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// basic_ostringstream<charT, traits> s;
|
|
|
|
// s.flags(o.flags());
|
|
|
|
// s.imbue(o.getloc());
|
|
|
|
// s.precision(o.precision());
|
|
|
|
// s << '(' << x.real() << "," << x.imag() << ')';
|
|
|
|
// return o << s.str();
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// Since operator<< for std::string sets o.width(0), operator<< for
|
|
|
|
// std::complex should do the same.
|
2020-05-08 01:49:12 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2020-10-17 02:19:39 +08:00
|
|
|
for (int width = 0; width <= 5; ++width) {
|
|
|
|
std::complex<double> const c(1, 2);
|
|
|
|
std::ostringstream os;
|
|
|
|
os.width(width);
|
|
|
|
os.fill('_');
|
|
|
|
os << c;
|
|
|
|
assert(os.width() == 0);
|
|
|
|
assert(os.str() == "(1,2)");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
std::complex<double> const c(1, 2);
|
|
|
|
std::ostringstream os;
|
|
|
|
os.width(6);
|
|
|
|
os.fill('_');
|
|
|
|
os << c;
|
|
|
|
assert(os.width() == 0);
|
|
|
|
assert(os.str() == "_(1,2)");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
std::complex<double> const c(1, 2);
|
|
|
|
std::ostringstream os;
|
|
|
|
os.width(7);
|
|
|
|
os.fill('_');
|
|
|
|
os << c;
|
|
|
|
assert(os.width() == 0);
|
|
|
|
assert(os.str() == "__(1,2)");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
std::complex<double> const c(1, 2);
|
|
|
|
std::ostringstream os;
|
|
|
|
os.width(8);
|
|
|
|
os.fill('_');
|
|
|
|
os << c;
|
|
|
|
assert(os.width() == 0);
|
|
|
|
assert(os.str() == "___(1,2)");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// Insert something after the complex and make sure the
|
|
|
|
// stream's width has been reset as expected.
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
std::complex<double> const c(1, 2);
|
|
|
|
std::ostringstream os;
|
|
|
|
os.width(8);
|
|
|
|
os.fill('_');
|
|
|
|
os << c;
|
|
|
|
assert(os.width() == 0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
os << "hello";
|
|
|
|
assert(os.str() == "___(1,2)hello");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Test with numbers that result in different output lengths, to
|
|
|
|
// make sure we handle custom width() correctly.
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
std::complex<double> const c(123, 456);
|
|
|
|
std::ostringstream os;
|
|
|
|
os.width(4);
|
|
|
|
os.fill('_');
|
|
|
|
os << c;
|
|
|
|
assert(os.width() == 0);
|
|
|
|
assert(os.str() == "(123,456)");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
std::complex<double> const c(123, 456);
|
|
|
|
std::ostringstream os;
|
|
|
|
os.width(12);
|
|
|
|
os.fill('_');
|
|
|
|
os << c;
|
|
|
|
assert(os.width() == 0);
|
|
|
|
assert(os.str() == "___(123,456)");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
os << "hello";
|
|
|
|
assert(os.str() == "___(123,456)hello");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Make sure left fill behaves correctly
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
std::complex<double> const c(123, 456);
|
|
|
|
std::ostringstream os;
|
|
|
|
os.width(12);
|
|
|
|
os.fill('_');
|
|
|
|
os << std::left << c;
|
|
|
|
assert(os.width() == 0);
|
|
|
|
assert(os.str() == "(123,456)___");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
os << "xy";
|
|
|
|
assert(os.str() == "(123,456)___xy");
|
|
|
|
}
|
2020-05-08 01:49:12 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
Support tests in freestanding
Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".
Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:
In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:
self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']
Run the tests and they all fail.
Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).
Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.
The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.
The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:
https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed
This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.
Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.
<rdar://problem/47754795>
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624
llvm-svn: 353086
2019-02-05 04:31:13 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-10-17 02:19:39 +08:00
|
|
|
return 0;
|
2010-05-12 03:42:16 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|