llvm-project/clang/lib/Sema/SemaInit.cpp

5943 lines
229 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

//===--- SemaInit.cpp - Semantic Analysis for Initializers ----------------===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// This file implements semantic analysis for initializers.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "clang/Sema/Designator.h"
#include "clang/Sema/Initialization.h"
#include "clang/Sema/Lookup.h"
#include "clang/Sema/SemaInternal.h"
#include "clang/Lex/Preprocessor.h"
#include "clang/AST/ASTContext.h"
#include "clang/AST/DeclObjC.h"
#include "clang/AST/ExprCXX.h"
#include "clang/AST/ExprObjC.h"
#include "clang/AST/TypeLoc.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/APInt.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallString.h"
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
#include "llvm/Support/ErrorHandling.h"
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
#include <map>
using namespace clang;
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// Sema Initialization Checking
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
static Expr *IsStringInit(Expr *Init, const ArrayType *AT,
ASTContext &Context) {
if (!isa<ConstantArrayType>(AT) && !isa<IncompleteArrayType>(AT))
return 0;
// See if this is a string literal or @encode.
Init = Init->IgnoreParens();
// Handle @encode, which is a narrow string.
if (isa<ObjCEncodeExpr>(Init) && AT->getElementType()->isCharType())
return Init;
// Otherwise we can only handle string literals.
StringLiteral *SL = dyn_cast<StringLiteral>(Init);
2009-02-27 07:42:47 +08:00
if (SL == 0) return 0;
QualType ElemTy = Context.getCanonicalType(AT->getElementType());
switch (SL->getKind()) {
case StringLiteral::Ascii:
case StringLiteral::UTF8:
// char array can be initialized with a narrow string.
// Only allow char x[] = "foo"; not char x[] = L"foo";
return ElemTy->isCharType() ? Init : 0;
case StringLiteral::UTF16:
return ElemTy->isChar16Type() ? Init : 0;
case StringLiteral::UTF32:
return ElemTy->isChar32Type() ? Init : 0;
case StringLiteral::Wide:
// wchar_t array can be initialized with a wide string: C99 6.7.8p15 (with
// correction from DR343): "An array with element type compatible with a
// qualified or unqualified version of wchar_t may be initialized by a wide
// string literal, optionally enclosed in braces."
if (Context.typesAreCompatible(Context.getWCharType(),
ElemTy.getUnqualifiedType()))
return Init;
return 0;
}
llvm_unreachable("missed a StringLiteral kind?");
}
static Expr *IsStringInit(Expr *init, QualType declType, ASTContext &Context) {
const ArrayType *arrayType = Context.getAsArrayType(declType);
if (!arrayType) return 0;
return IsStringInit(init, arrayType, Context);
}
static void CheckStringInit(Expr *Str, QualType &DeclT, const ArrayType *AT,
Sema &S) {
// Get the length of the string as parsed.
uint64_t StrLength =
cast<ConstantArrayType>(Str->getType())->getSize().getZExtValue();
if (const IncompleteArrayType *IAT = dyn_cast<IncompleteArrayType>(AT)) {
// C99 6.7.8p14. We have an array of character type with unknown size
// being initialized to a string literal.
llvm::APSInt ConstVal(32);
ConstVal = StrLength;
// Return a new array type (C99 6.7.8p22).
DeclT = S.Context.getConstantArrayType(IAT->getElementType(),
ConstVal,
ArrayType::Normal, 0);
return;
}
const ConstantArrayType *CAT = cast<ConstantArrayType>(AT);
// We have an array of character type with known size. However,
// the size may be smaller or larger than the string we are initializing.
// FIXME: Avoid truncation for 64-bit length strings.
if (S.getLangOptions().CPlusPlus) {
if (StringLiteral *SL = dyn_cast<StringLiteral>(Str)) {
// For Pascal strings it's OK to strip off the terminating null character,
// so the example below is valid:
//
// unsigned char a[2] = "\pa";
if (SL->isPascal())
StrLength--;
}
// [dcl.init.string]p2
if (StrLength > CAT->getSize().getZExtValue())
S.Diag(Str->getSourceRange().getBegin(),
diag::err_initializer_string_for_char_array_too_long)
<< Str->getSourceRange();
} else {
// C99 6.7.8p14.
if (StrLength-1 > CAT->getSize().getZExtValue())
S.Diag(Str->getSourceRange().getBegin(),
diag::warn_initializer_string_for_char_array_too_long)
<< Str->getSourceRange();
}
// Set the type to the actual size that we are initializing. If we have
// something like:
// char x[1] = "foo";
// then this will set the string literal's type to char[1].
Str->setType(DeclT);
}
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// Semantic checking for initializer lists.
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
/// @brief Semantic checking for initializer lists.
///
/// The InitListChecker class contains a set of routines that each
/// handle the initialization of a certain kind of entity, e.g.,
/// arrays, vectors, struct/union types, scalars, etc. The
/// InitListChecker itself performs a recursive walk of the subobject
/// structure of the type to be initialized, while stepping through
/// the initializer list one element at a time. The IList and Index
/// parameters to each of the Check* routines contain the active
/// (syntactic) initializer list and the index into that initializer
/// list that represents the current initializer. Each routine is
/// responsible for moving that Index forward as it consumes elements.
///
/// Each Check* routine also has a StructuredList/StructuredIndex
/// arguments, which contains the current "structured" (semantic)
/// initializer list and the index into that initializer list where we
/// are copying initializers as we map them over to the semantic
/// list. Once we have completed our recursive walk of the subobject
/// structure, we will have constructed a full semantic initializer
/// list.
///
/// C99 designators cause changes in the initializer list traversal,
/// because they make the initialization "jump" into a specific
/// subobject and then continue the initialization from that
/// point. CheckDesignatedInitializer() recursively steps into the
/// designated subobject and manages backing out the recursion to
/// initialize the subobjects after the one designated.
namespace {
class InitListChecker {
Sema &SemaRef;
bool hadError;
bool VerifyOnly; // no diagnostics, no structure building
bool AllowBraceElision;
std::map<InitListExpr *, InitListExpr *> SyntacticToSemantic;
InitListExpr *FullyStructuredList;
void CheckImplicitInitList(const InitializedEntity &Entity,
InitListExpr *ParentIList, QualType T,
unsigned &Index, InitListExpr *StructuredList,
unsigned &StructuredIndex);
void CheckExplicitInitList(const InitializedEntity &Entity,
InitListExpr *IList, QualType &T,
unsigned &Index, InitListExpr *StructuredList,
unsigned &StructuredIndex,
bool TopLevelObject = false);
void CheckListElementTypes(const InitializedEntity &Entity,
InitListExpr *IList, QualType &DeclType,
bool SubobjectIsDesignatorContext,
unsigned &Index,
InitListExpr *StructuredList,
unsigned &StructuredIndex,
bool TopLevelObject = false);
void CheckSubElementType(const InitializedEntity &Entity,
InitListExpr *IList, QualType ElemType,
unsigned &Index,
InitListExpr *StructuredList,
unsigned &StructuredIndex);
void CheckComplexType(const InitializedEntity &Entity,
InitListExpr *IList, QualType DeclType,
unsigned &Index,
InitListExpr *StructuredList,
unsigned &StructuredIndex);
void CheckScalarType(const InitializedEntity &Entity,
InitListExpr *IList, QualType DeclType,
unsigned &Index,
InitListExpr *StructuredList,
unsigned &StructuredIndex);
void CheckReferenceType(const InitializedEntity &Entity,
InitListExpr *IList, QualType DeclType,
unsigned &Index,
InitListExpr *StructuredList,
unsigned &StructuredIndex);
void CheckVectorType(const InitializedEntity &Entity,
InitListExpr *IList, QualType DeclType, unsigned &Index,
InitListExpr *StructuredList,
unsigned &StructuredIndex);
void CheckStructUnionTypes(const InitializedEntity &Entity,
InitListExpr *IList, QualType DeclType,
RecordDecl::field_iterator Field,
bool SubobjectIsDesignatorContext, unsigned &Index,
InitListExpr *StructuredList,
unsigned &StructuredIndex,
bool TopLevelObject = false);
void CheckArrayType(const InitializedEntity &Entity,
InitListExpr *IList, QualType &DeclType,
llvm::APSInt elementIndex,
bool SubobjectIsDesignatorContext, unsigned &Index,
InitListExpr *StructuredList,
unsigned &StructuredIndex);
bool CheckDesignatedInitializer(const InitializedEntity &Entity,
InitListExpr *IList, DesignatedInitExpr *DIE,
unsigned DesigIdx,
QualType &CurrentObjectType,
RecordDecl::field_iterator *NextField,
llvm::APSInt *NextElementIndex,
unsigned &Index,
InitListExpr *StructuredList,
unsigned &StructuredIndex,
bool FinishSubobjectInit,
bool TopLevelObject);
InitListExpr *getStructuredSubobjectInit(InitListExpr *IList, unsigned Index,
QualType CurrentObjectType,
InitListExpr *StructuredList,
unsigned StructuredIndex,
SourceRange InitRange);
void UpdateStructuredListElement(InitListExpr *StructuredList,
unsigned &StructuredIndex,
Expr *expr);
int numArrayElements(QualType DeclType);
int numStructUnionElements(QualType DeclType);
void FillInValueInitForField(unsigned Init, FieldDecl *Field,
const InitializedEntity &ParentEntity,
InitListExpr *ILE, bool &RequiresSecondPass);
void FillInValueInitializations(const InitializedEntity &Entity,
InitListExpr *ILE, bool &RequiresSecondPass);
bool CheckFlexibleArrayInit(const InitializedEntity &Entity,
Expr *InitExpr, FieldDecl *Field,
bool TopLevelObject);
void CheckValueInitializable(const InitializedEntity &Entity);
public:
InitListChecker(Sema &S, const InitializedEntity &Entity,
InitListExpr *IL, QualType &T, bool VerifyOnly,
bool AllowBraceElision);
bool HadError() { return hadError; }
// @brief Retrieves the fully-structured initializer list used for
// semantic analysis and code generation.
InitListExpr *getFullyStructuredList() const { return FullyStructuredList; }
};
} // end anonymous namespace
void InitListChecker::CheckValueInitializable(const InitializedEntity &Entity) {
assert(VerifyOnly &&
"CheckValueInitializable is only inteded for verification mode.");
SourceLocation Loc;
InitializationKind Kind = InitializationKind::CreateValue(Loc, Loc, Loc,
true);
InitializationSequence InitSeq(SemaRef, Entity, Kind, 0, 0);
if (InitSeq.Failed())
hadError = true;
}
void InitListChecker::FillInValueInitForField(unsigned Init, FieldDecl *Field,
const InitializedEntity &ParentEntity,
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
InitListExpr *ILE,
bool &RequiresSecondPass) {
SourceLocation Loc = ILE->getSourceRange().getBegin();
unsigned NumInits = ILE->getNumInits();
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
InitializedEntity MemberEntity
= InitializedEntity::InitializeMember(Field, &ParentEntity);
if (Init >= NumInits || !ILE->getInit(Init)) {
// FIXME: We probably don't need to handle references
// specially here, since value-initialization of references is
// handled in InitializationSequence.
if (Field->getType()->isReferenceType()) {
// C++ [dcl.init.aggr]p9:
// If an incomplete or empty initializer-list leaves a
// member of reference type uninitialized, the program is
// ill-formed.
SemaRef.Diag(Loc, diag::err_init_reference_member_uninitialized)
<< Field->getType()
<< ILE->getSyntacticForm()->getSourceRange();
SemaRef.Diag(Field->getLocation(),
diag::note_uninit_reference_member);
hadError = true;
return;
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
InitializationKind Kind = InitializationKind::CreateValue(Loc, Loc, Loc,
true);
InitializationSequence InitSeq(SemaRef, MemberEntity, Kind, 0, 0);
if (!InitSeq) {
InitSeq.Diagnose(SemaRef, MemberEntity, Kind, 0, 0);
hadError = true;
return;
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
ExprResult MemberInit
= InitSeq.Perform(SemaRef, MemberEntity, Kind, MultiExprArg());
if (MemberInit.isInvalid()) {
hadError = true;
return;
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
if (hadError) {
// Do nothing
} else if (Init < NumInits) {
ILE->setInit(Init, MemberInit.takeAs<Expr>());
} else if (InitSeq.isConstructorInitialization()) {
// Value-initialization requires a constructor call, so
// extend the initializer list to include the constructor
// call and make a note that we'll need to take another pass
// through the initializer list.
ILE->updateInit(SemaRef.Context, Init, MemberInit.takeAs<Expr>());
RequiresSecondPass = true;
}
} else if (InitListExpr *InnerILE
= dyn_cast<InitListExpr>(ILE->getInit(Init)))
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
FillInValueInitializations(MemberEntity, InnerILE,
RequiresSecondPass);
}
/// Recursively replaces NULL values within the given initializer list
/// with expressions that perform value-initialization of the
/// appropriate type.
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
void
InitListChecker::FillInValueInitializations(const InitializedEntity &Entity,
InitListExpr *ILE,
bool &RequiresSecondPass) {
assert((ILE->getType() != SemaRef.Context.VoidTy) &&
"Should not have void type");
SourceLocation Loc = ILE->getSourceRange().getBegin();
if (ILE->getSyntacticForm())
Loc = ILE->getSyntacticForm()->getSourceRange().getBegin();
if (const RecordType *RType = ILE->getType()->getAs<RecordType>()) {
if (RType->getDecl()->isUnion() &&
ILE->getInitializedFieldInUnion())
FillInValueInitForField(0, ILE->getInitializedFieldInUnion(),
Entity, ILE, RequiresSecondPass);
else {
unsigned Init = 0;
for (RecordDecl::field_iterator
Field = RType->getDecl()->field_begin(),
FieldEnd = RType->getDecl()->field_end();
Field != FieldEnd; ++Field) {
if (Field->isUnnamedBitfield())
continue;
if (hadError)
return;
FillInValueInitForField(Init, *Field, Entity, ILE, RequiresSecondPass);
if (hadError)
return;
++Init;
// Only look at the first initialization of a union.
if (RType->getDecl()->isUnion())
break;
}
}
return;
}
QualType ElementType;
InitializedEntity ElementEntity = Entity;
unsigned NumInits = ILE->getNumInits();
unsigned NumElements = NumInits;
if (const ArrayType *AType = SemaRef.Context.getAsArrayType(ILE->getType())) {
ElementType = AType->getElementType();
if (const ConstantArrayType *CAType = dyn_cast<ConstantArrayType>(AType))
NumElements = CAType->getSize().getZExtValue();
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
ElementEntity = InitializedEntity::InitializeElement(SemaRef.Context,
0, Entity);
} else if (const VectorType *VType = ILE->getType()->getAs<VectorType>()) {
ElementType = VType->getElementType();
NumElements = VType->getNumElements();
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
ElementEntity = InitializedEntity::InitializeElement(SemaRef.Context,
0, Entity);
} else
ElementType = ILE->getType();
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
for (unsigned Init = 0; Init != NumElements; ++Init) {
if (hadError)
return;
if (ElementEntity.getKind() == InitializedEntity::EK_ArrayElement ||
ElementEntity.getKind() == InitializedEntity::EK_VectorElement)
ElementEntity.setElementIndex(Init);
Expr *InitExpr = (Init < NumInits ? ILE->getInit(Init) : 0);
if (!InitExpr && !ILE->hasArrayFiller()) {
InitializationKind Kind = InitializationKind::CreateValue(Loc, Loc, Loc,
true);
InitializationSequence InitSeq(SemaRef, ElementEntity, Kind, 0, 0);
if (!InitSeq) {
InitSeq.Diagnose(SemaRef, ElementEntity, Kind, 0, 0);
hadError = true;
return;
}
ExprResult ElementInit
= InitSeq.Perform(SemaRef, ElementEntity, Kind, MultiExprArg());
if (ElementInit.isInvalid()) {
hadError = true;
return;
}
if (hadError) {
// Do nothing
} else if (Init < NumInits) {
// For arrays, just set the expression used for value-initialization
// of the "holes" in the array.
if (ElementEntity.getKind() == InitializedEntity::EK_ArrayElement)
ILE->setArrayFiller(ElementInit.takeAs<Expr>());
else
ILE->setInit(Init, ElementInit.takeAs<Expr>());
} else {
// For arrays, just set the expression used for value-initialization
// of the rest of elements and exit.
if (ElementEntity.getKind() == InitializedEntity::EK_ArrayElement) {
ILE->setArrayFiller(ElementInit.takeAs<Expr>());
return;
}
if (InitSeq.isConstructorInitialization()) {
// Value-initialization requires a constructor call, so
// extend the initializer list to include the constructor
// call and make a note that we'll need to take another pass
// through the initializer list.
ILE->updateInit(SemaRef.Context, Init, ElementInit.takeAs<Expr>());
RequiresSecondPass = true;
}
}
2009-08-05 05:02:39 +08:00
} else if (InitListExpr *InnerILE
= dyn_cast_or_null<InitListExpr>(InitExpr))
FillInValueInitializations(ElementEntity, InnerILE, RequiresSecondPass);
}
}
InitListChecker::InitListChecker(Sema &S, const InitializedEntity &Entity,
InitListExpr *IL, QualType &T,
bool VerifyOnly, bool AllowBraceElision)
: SemaRef(S), VerifyOnly(VerifyOnly), AllowBraceElision(AllowBraceElision) {
hadError = false;
unsigned newIndex = 0;
unsigned newStructuredIndex = 0;
FullyStructuredList
= getStructuredSubobjectInit(IL, newIndex, T, 0, 0, IL->getSourceRange());
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
CheckExplicitInitList(Entity, IL, T, newIndex,
FullyStructuredList, newStructuredIndex,
/*TopLevelObject=*/true);
if (!hadError && !VerifyOnly) {
bool RequiresSecondPass = false;
FillInValueInitializations(Entity, FullyStructuredList, RequiresSecondPass);
if (RequiresSecondPass && !hadError)
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
FillInValueInitializations(Entity, FullyStructuredList,
RequiresSecondPass);
}
}
int InitListChecker::numArrayElements(QualType DeclType) {
// FIXME: use a proper constant
int maxElements = 0x7FFFFFFF;
if (const ConstantArrayType *CAT =
SemaRef.Context.getAsConstantArrayType(DeclType)) {
maxElements = static_cast<int>(CAT->getSize().getZExtValue());
}
return maxElements;
}
int InitListChecker::numStructUnionElements(QualType DeclType) {
RecordDecl *structDecl = DeclType->getAs<RecordType>()->getDecl();
int InitializableMembers = 0;
for (RecordDecl::field_iterator
Field = structDecl->field_begin(),
FieldEnd = structDecl->field_end();
Field != FieldEnd; ++Field) {
if (!Field->isUnnamedBitfield())
++InitializableMembers;
}
if (structDecl->isUnion())
return std::min(InitializableMembers, 1);
return InitializableMembers - structDecl->hasFlexibleArrayMember();
}
void InitListChecker::CheckImplicitInitList(const InitializedEntity &Entity,
InitListExpr *ParentIList,
QualType T, unsigned &Index,
InitListExpr *StructuredList,
unsigned &StructuredIndex) {
int maxElements = 0;
if (T->isArrayType())
maxElements = numArrayElements(T);
else if (T->isRecordType())
maxElements = numStructUnionElements(T);
else if (T->isVectorType())
maxElements = T->getAs<VectorType>()->getNumElements();
else
llvm_unreachable("CheckImplicitInitList(): Illegal type");
if (maxElements == 0) {
if (!VerifyOnly)
SemaRef.Diag(ParentIList->getInit(Index)->getLocStart(),
diag::err_implicit_empty_initializer);
++Index;
hadError = true;
return;
}
// Build a structured initializer list corresponding to this subobject.
InitListExpr *StructuredSubobjectInitList
= getStructuredSubobjectInit(ParentIList, Index, T, StructuredList,
StructuredIndex,
SourceRange(ParentIList->getInit(Index)->getSourceRange().getBegin(),
ParentIList->getSourceRange().getEnd()));
unsigned StructuredSubobjectInitIndex = 0;
// Check the element types and build the structural subobject.
unsigned StartIndex = Index;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
CheckListElementTypes(Entity, ParentIList, T,
/*SubobjectIsDesignatorContext=*/false, Index,
StructuredSubobjectInitList,
StructuredSubobjectInitIndex);
if (VerifyOnly) {
if (!AllowBraceElision && (T->isArrayType() || T->isRecordType()))
hadError = true;
} else {
StructuredSubobjectInitList->setType(T);
unsigned EndIndex = (Index == StartIndex? StartIndex : Index - 1);
// Update the structured sub-object initializer so that it's ending
// range corresponds with the end of the last initializer it used.
if (EndIndex < ParentIList->getNumInits()) {
SourceLocation EndLoc
= ParentIList->getInit(EndIndex)->getSourceRange().getEnd();
StructuredSubobjectInitList->setRBraceLoc(EndLoc);
}
// Complain about missing braces.
if (T->isArrayType() || T->isRecordType()) {
SemaRef.Diag(StructuredSubobjectInitList->getLocStart(),
AllowBraceElision ? diag::warn_missing_braces :
diag::err_missing_braces)
<< StructuredSubobjectInitList->getSourceRange()
<< FixItHint::CreateInsertion(
StructuredSubobjectInitList->getLocStart(), "{")
<< FixItHint::CreateInsertion(
SemaRef.PP.getLocForEndOfToken(
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
StructuredSubobjectInitList->getLocEnd()),
"}");
if (!AllowBraceElision)
hadError = true;
}
}
}
void InitListChecker::CheckExplicitInitList(const InitializedEntity &Entity,
InitListExpr *IList, QualType &T,
unsigned &Index,
InitListExpr *StructuredList,
unsigned &StructuredIndex,
bool TopLevelObject) {
assert(IList->isExplicit() && "Illegal Implicit InitListExpr");
if (!VerifyOnly) {
SyntacticToSemantic[IList] = StructuredList;
StructuredList->setSyntacticForm(IList);
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
CheckListElementTypes(Entity, IList, T, /*SubobjectIsDesignatorContext=*/true,
Index, StructuredList, StructuredIndex, TopLevelObject);
if (!VerifyOnly) {
QualType ExprTy = T.getNonLValueExprType(SemaRef.Context);
IList->setType(ExprTy);
StructuredList->setType(ExprTy);
}
if (hadError)
return;
if (Index < IList->getNumInits()) {
// We have leftover initializers
if (VerifyOnly) {
if (SemaRef.getLangOptions().CPlusPlus ||
(SemaRef.getLangOptions().OpenCL &&
IList->getType()->isVectorType())) {
hadError = true;
}
return;
}
if (StructuredIndex == 1 &&
IsStringInit(StructuredList->getInit(0), T, SemaRef.Context)) {
unsigned DK = diag::warn_excess_initializers_in_char_array_initializer;
if (SemaRef.getLangOptions().CPlusPlus) {
DK = diag::err_excess_initializers_in_char_array_initializer;
hadError = true;
}
// Special-case
SemaRef.Diag(IList->getInit(Index)->getLocStart(), DK)
<< IList->getInit(Index)->getSourceRange();
} else if (!T->isIncompleteType()) {
// Don't complain for incomplete types, since we'll get an error
// elsewhere
QualType CurrentObjectType = StructuredList->getType();
int initKind =
CurrentObjectType->isArrayType()? 0 :
CurrentObjectType->isVectorType()? 1 :
CurrentObjectType->isScalarType()? 2 :
CurrentObjectType->isUnionType()? 3 :
4;
unsigned DK = diag::warn_excess_initializers;
if (SemaRef.getLangOptions().CPlusPlus) {
DK = diag::err_excess_initializers;
hadError = true;
}
if (SemaRef.getLangOptions().OpenCL && initKind == 1) {
DK = diag::err_excess_initializers;
hadError = true;
}
SemaRef.Diag(IList->getInit(Index)->getLocStart(), DK)
<< initKind << IList->getInit(Index)->getSourceRange();
}
}
if (!VerifyOnly && T->isScalarType() && IList->getNumInits() == 1 &&
!TopLevelObject)
SemaRef.Diag(IList->getLocStart(), diag::warn_braces_around_scalar_init)
<< IList->getSourceRange()
<< FixItHint::CreateRemoval(IList->getLocStart())
<< FixItHint::CreateRemoval(IList->getLocEnd());
}
void InitListChecker::CheckListElementTypes(const InitializedEntity &Entity,
InitListExpr *IList,
QualType &DeclType,
bool SubobjectIsDesignatorContext,
unsigned &Index,
InitListExpr *StructuredList,
unsigned &StructuredIndex,
bool TopLevelObject) {
if (DeclType->isAnyComplexType() && SubobjectIsDesignatorContext) {
// Explicitly braced initializer for complex type can be real+imaginary
// parts.
CheckComplexType(Entity, IList, DeclType, Index,
StructuredList, StructuredIndex);
} else if (DeclType->isScalarType()) {
CheckScalarType(Entity, IList, DeclType, Index,
StructuredList, StructuredIndex);
} else if (DeclType->isVectorType()) {
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
CheckVectorType(Entity, IList, DeclType, Index,
StructuredList, StructuredIndex);
} else if (DeclType->isAggregateType()) {
if (DeclType->isRecordType()) {
RecordDecl *RD = DeclType->getAs<RecordType>()->getDecl();
CheckStructUnionTypes(Entity, IList, DeclType, RD->field_begin(),
SubobjectIsDesignatorContext, Index,
StructuredList, StructuredIndex,
TopLevelObject);
} else if (DeclType->isArrayType()) {
llvm::APSInt Zero(
SemaRef.Context.getTypeSize(SemaRef.Context.getSizeType()),
false);
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
CheckArrayType(Entity, IList, DeclType, Zero,
SubobjectIsDesignatorContext, Index,
StructuredList, StructuredIndex);
2009-08-05 05:02:39 +08:00
} else
llvm_unreachable("Aggregate that isn't a structure or array?!");
} else if (DeclType->isVoidType() || DeclType->isFunctionType()) {
// This type is invalid, issue a diagnostic.
++Index;
if (!VerifyOnly)
SemaRef.Diag(IList->getLocStart(), diag::err_illegal_initializer_type)
<< DeclType;
hadError = true;
} else if (DeclType->isRecordType()) {
// C++ [dcl.init]p14:
// [...] If the class is an aggregate (8.5.1), and the initializer
// is a brace-enclosed list, see 8.5.1.
//
// Note: 8.5.1 is handled below; here, we diagnose the case where
// we have an initializer list and a destination type that is not
// an aggregate.
// FIXME: In C++0x, this is yet another form of initialization.
if (!VerifyOnly)
SemaRef.Diag(IList->getLocStart(), diag::err_init_non_aggr_init_list)
<< DeclType << IList->getSourceRange();
hadError = true;
} else if (DeclType->isReferenceType()) {
CheckReferenceType(Entity, IList, DeclType, Index,
StructuredList, StructuredIndex);
} else if (DeclType->isObjCObjectType()) {
if (!VerifyOnly)
SemaRef.Diag(IList->getLocStart(), diag::err_init_objc_class)
<< DeclType;
hadError = true;
} else {
if (!VerifyOnly)
SemaRef.Diag(IList->getLocStart(), diag::err_illegal_initializer_type)
<< DeclType;
hadError = true;
}
}
void InitListChecker::CheckSubElementType(const InitializedEntity &Entity,
InitListExpr *IList,
QualType ElemType,
unsigned &Index,
InitListExpr *StructuredList,
unsigned &StructuredIndex) {
Expr *expr = IList->getInit(Index);
if (InitListExpr *SubInitList = dyn_cast<InitListExpr>(expr)) {
unsigned newIndex = 0;
unsigned newStructuredIndex = 0;
InitListExpr *newStructuredList
= getStructuredSubobjectInit(IList, Index, ElemType,
StructuredList, StructuredIndex,
SubInitList->getSourceRange());
CheckExplicitInitList(Entity, SubInitList, ElemType, newIndex,
newStructuredList, newStructuredIndex);
++StructuredIndex;
++Index;
return;
} else if (ElemType->isScalarType()) {
return CheckScalarType(Entity, IList, ElemType, Index,
StructuredList, StructuredIndex);
} else if (ElemType->isReferenceType()) {
return CheckReferenceType(Entity, IList, ElemType, Index,
StructuredList, StructuredIndex);
}
if (const ArrayType *arrayType = SemaRef.Context.getAsArrayType(ElemType)) {
// arrayType can be incomplete if we're initializing a flexible
// array member. There's nothing we can do with the completed
// type here, though.
if (Expr *Str = IsStringInit(expr, arrayType, SemaRef.Context)) {
if (!VerifyOnly) {
CheckStringInit(Str, ElemType, arrayType, SemaRef);
UpdateStructuredListElement(StructuredList, StructuredIndex, Str);
}
++Index;
return;
}
// Fall through for subaggregate initialization.
} else if (SemaRef.getLangOptions().CPlusPlus) {
// C++ [dcl.init.aggr]p12:
// All implicit type conversions (clause 4) are considered when
// initializing the aggregate member with an initializer from
// an initializer-list. If the initializer can initialize a
// member, the member is initialized. [...]
// FIXME: Better EqualLoc?
InitializationKind Kind =
InitializationKind::CreateCopy(expr->getLocStart(), SourceLocation());
InitializationSequence Seq(SemaRef, Entity, Kind, &expr, 1);
if (Seq) {
if (!VerifyOnly) {
ExprResult Result =
Seq.Perform(SemaRef, Entity, Kind, MultiExprArg(&expr, 1));
if (Result.isInvalid())
hadError = true;
UpdateStructuredListElement(StructuredList, StructuredIndex,
Result.takeAs<Expr>());
}
++Index;
return;
}
// Fall through for subaggregate initialization
} else {
// C99 6.7.8p13:
//
// The initializer for a structure or union object that has
// automatic storage duration shall be either an initializer
// list as described below, or a single expression that has
// compatible structure or union type. In the latter case, the
// initial value of the object, including unnamed members, is
// that of the expression.
ExprResult ExprRes = SemaRef.Owned(expr);
if ((ElemType->isRecordType() || ElemType->isVectorType()) &&
SemaRef.CheckSingleAssignmentConstraints(ElemType, ExprRes,
!VerifyOnly)
== Sema::Compatible) {
if (ExprRes.isInvalid())
hadError = true;
else {
ExprRes = SemaRef.DefaultFunctionArrayLvalueConversion(ExprRes.take());
if (ExprRes.isInvalid())
hadError = true;
}
UpdateStructuredListElement(StructuredList, StructuredIndex,
ExprRes.takeAs<Expr>());
++Index;
return;
}
ExprRes.release();
// Fall through for subaggregate initialization
}
// C++ [dcl.init.aggr]p12:
//
// [...] Otherwise, if the member is itself a non-empty
// subaggregate, brace elision is assumed and the initializer is
// considered for the initialization of the first member of
// the subaggregate.
if (!SemaRef.getLangOptions().OpenCL &&
(ElemType->isAggregateType() || ElemType->isVectorType())) {
CheckImplicitInitList(Entity, IList, ElemType, Index, StructuredList,
StructuredIndex);
++StructuredIndex;
} else {
if (!VerifyOnly) {
// We cannot initialize this element, so let
// PerformCopyInitialization produce the appropriate diagnostic.
SemaRef.PerformCopyInitialization(Entity, SourceLocation(),
SemaRef.Owned(expr),
/*TopLevelOfInitList=*/true);
}
hadError = true;
++Index;
++StructuredIndex;
}
}
void InitListChecker::CheckComplexType(const InitializedEntity &Entity,
InitListExpr *IList, QualType DeclType,
unsigned &Index,
InitListExpr *StructuredList,
unsigned &StructuredIndex) {
assert(Index == 0 && "Index in explicit init list must be zero");
// As an extension, clang supports complex initializers, which initialize
// a complex number component-wise. When an explicit initializer list for
// a complex number contains two two initializers, this extension kicks in:
// it exepcts the initializer list to contain two elements convertible to
// the element type of the complex type. The first element initializes
// the real part, and the second element intitializes the imaginary part.
if (IList->getNumInits() != 2)
return CheckScalarType(Entity, IList, DeclType, Index, StructuredList,
StructuredIndex);
// This is an extension in C. (The builtin _Complex type does not exist
// in the C++ standard.)
if (!SemaRef.getLangOptions().CPlusPlus && !VerifyOnly)
SemaRef.Diag(IList->getLocStart(), diag::ext_complex_component_init)
<< IList->getSourceRange();
// Initialize the complex number.
QualType elementType = DeclType->getAs<ComplexType>()->getElementType();
InitializedEntity ElementEntity =
InitializedEntity::InitializeElement(SemaRef.Context, 0, Entity);
for (unsigned i = 0; i < 2; ++i) {
ElementEntity.setElementIndex(Index);
CheckSubElementType(ElementEntity, IList, elementType, Index,
StructuredList, StructuredIndex);
}
}
void InitListChecker::CheckScalarType(const InitializedEntity &Entity,
InitListExpr *IList, QualType DeclType,
unsigned &Index,
InitListExpr *StructuredList,
unsigned &StructuredIndex) {
if (Index >= IList->getNumInits()) {
if (!VerifyOnly)
SemaRef.Diag(IList->getLocStart(),
SemaRef.getLangOptions().CPlusPlus0x ?
diag::warn_cxx98_compat_empty_scalar_initializer :
diag::err_empty_scalar_initializer)
<< IList->getSourceRange();
hadError = !SemaRef.getLangOptions().CPlusPlus0x;
++Index;
++StructuredIndex;
return;
}
Expr *expr = IList->getInit(Index);
if (InitListExpr *SubIList = dyn_cast<InitListExpr>(expr)) {
if (!VerifyOnly)
SemaRef.Diag(SubIList->getLocStart(),
diag::warn_many_braces_around_scalar_init)
<< SubIList->getSourceRange();
CheckScalarType(Entity, SubIList, DeclType, Index, StructuredList,
StructuredIndex);
return;
} else if (isa<DesignatedInitExpr>(expr)) {
if (!VerifyOnly)
SemaRef.Diag(expr->getSourceRange().getBegin(),
diag::err_designator_for_scalar_init)
<< DeclType << expr->getSourceRange();
hadError = true;
++Index;
++StructuredIndex;
return;
}
if (VerifyOnly) {
if (!SemaRef.CanPerformCopyInitialization(Entity, SemaRef.Owned(expr)))
hadError = true;
++Index;
return;
}
ExprResult Result =
SemaRef.PerformCopyInitialization(Entity, expr->getLocStart(),
SemaRef.Owned(expr),
/*TopLevelOfInitList=*/true);
Expr *ResultExpr = 0;
if (Result.isInvalid())
hadError = true; // types weren't compatible.
else {
ResultExpr = Result.takeAs<Expr>();
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
if (ResultExpr != expr) {
// The type was promoted, update initializer list.
IList->setInit(Index, ResultExpr);
}
}
if (hadError)
++StructuredIndex;
else
UpdateStructuredListElement(StructuredList, StructuredIndex, ResultExpr);
++Index;
}
void InitListChecker::CheckReferenceType(const InitializedEntity &Entity,
InitListExpr *IList, QualType DeclType,
unsigned &Index,
InitListExpr *StructuredList,
unsigned &StructuredIndex) {
if (Index >= IList->getNumInits()) {
2009-05-16 15:39:55 +08:00
// FIXME: It would be wonderful if we could point at the actual member. In
// general, it would be useful to pass location information down the stack,
// so that we know the location (or decl) of the "current object" being
// initialized.
if (!VerifyOnly)
SemaRef.Diag(IList->getLocStart(),
diag::err_init_reference_member_uninitialized)
<< DeclType
<< IList->getSourceRange();
hadError = true;
++Index;
++StructuredIndex;
return;
}
Expr *expr = IList->getInit(Index);
if (isa<InitListExpr>(expr) && !SemaRef.getLangOptions().CPlusPlus0x) {
if (!VerifyOnly)
SemaRef.Diag(IList->getLocStart(), diag::err_init_non_aggr_init_list)
<< DeclType << IList->getSourceRange();
hadError = true;
++Index;
++StructuredIndex;
return;
}
if (VerifyOnly) {
if (!SemaRef.CanPerformCopyInitialization(Entity, SemaRef.Owned(expr)))
hadError = true;
++Index;
return;
}
ExprResult Result =
SemaRef.PerformCopyInitialization(Entity, expr->getLocStart(),
SemaRef.Owned(expr),
/*TopLevelOfInitList=*/true);
if (Result.isInvalid())
hadError = true;
expr = Result.takeAs<Expr>();
IList->setInit(Index, expr);
if (hadError)
++StructuredIndex;
else
UpdateStructuredListElement(StructuredList, StructuredIndex, expr);
++Index;
}
void InitListChecker::CheckVectorType(const InitializedEntity &Entity,
InitListExpr *IList, QualType DeclType,
unsigned &Index,
InitListExpr *StructuredList,
unsigned &StructuredIndex) {
const VectorType *VT = DeclType->getAs<VectorType>();
unsigned maxElements = VT->getNumElements();
unsigned numEltsInit = 0;
QualType elementType = VT->getElementType();
if (Index >= IList->getNumInits()) {
// Make sure the element type can be value-initialized.
if (VerifyOnly)
CheckValueInitializable(
InitializedEntity::InitializeElement(SemaRef.Context, 0, Entity));
return;
}
if (!SemaRef.getLangOptions().OpenCL) {
// If the initializing element is a vector, try to copy-initialize
// instead of breaking it apart (which is doomed to failure anyway).
Expr *Init = IList->getInit(Index);
if (!isa<InitListExpr>(Init) && Init->getType()->isVectorType()) {
if (VerifyOnly) {
if (!SemaRef.CanPerformCopyInitialization(Entity, SemaRef.Owned(Init)))
hadError = true;
++Index;
return;
}
ExprResult Result =
SemaRef.PerformCopyInitialization(Entity, Init->getLocStart(),
SemaRef.Owned(Init),
/*TopLevelOfInitList=*/true);
Expr *ResultExpr = 0;
if (Result.isInvalid())
hadError = true; // types weren't compatible.
else {
ResultExpr = Result.takeAs<Expr>();
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
if (ResultExpr != Init) {
// The type was promoted, update initializer list.
IList->setInit(Index, ResultExpr);
}
}
if (hadError)
++StructuredIndex;
else
UpdateStructuredListElement(StructuredList, StructuredIndex,
ResultExpr);
++Index;
return;
}
InitializedEntity ElementEntity =
InitializedEntity::InitializeElement(SemaRef.Context, 0, Entity);
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
for (unsigned i = 0; i < maxElements; ++i, ++numEltsInit) {
// Don't attempt to go past the end of the init list
if (Index >= IList->getNumInits()) {
if (VerifyOnly)
CheckValueInitializable(ElementEntity);
break;
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
ElementEntity.setElementIndex(Index);
CheckSubElementType(ElementEntity, IList, elementType, Index,
StructuredList, StructuredIndex);
}
return;
}
InitializedEntity ElementEntity =
InitializedEntity::InitializeElement(SemaRef.Context, 0, Entity);
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// OpenCL initializers allows vectors to be constructed from vectors.
for (unsigned i = 0; i < maxElements; ++i) {
// Don't attempt to go past the end of the init list
if (Index >= IList->getNumInits())
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
ElementEntity.setElementIndex(Index);
QualType IType = IList->getInit(Index)->getType();
if (!IType->isVectorType()) {
CheckSubElementType(ElementEntity, IList, elementType, Index,
StructuredList, StructuredIndex);
++numEltsInit;
} else {
QualType VecType;
const VectorType *IVT = IType->getAs<VectorType>();
unsigned numIElts = IVT->getNumElements();
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
if (IType->isExtVectorType())
VecType = SemaRef.Context.getExtVectorType(elementType, numIElts);
else
VecType = SemaRef.Context.getVectorType(elementType, numIElts,
IVT->getVectorKind());
CheckSubElementType(ElementEntity, IList, VecType, Index,
StructuredList, StructuredIndex);
numEltsInit += numIElts;
}
}
// OpenCL requires all elements to be initialized.
if (numEltsInit != maxElements) {
if (!VerifyOnly)
SemaRef.Diag(IList->getSourceRange().getBegin(),
diag::err_vector_incorrect_num_initializers)
<< (numEltsInit < maxElements) << maxElements << numEltsInit;
hadError = true;
}
}
void InitListChecker::CheckArrayType(const InitializedEntity &Entity,
InitListExpr *IList, QualType &DeclType,
llvm::APSInt elementIndex,
bool SubobjectIsDesignatorContext,
unsigned &Index,
InitListExpr *StructuredList,
unsigned &StructuredIndex) {
const ArrayType *arrayType = SemaRef.Context.getAsArrayType(DeclType);
// Check for the special-case of initializing an array with a string.
if (Index < IList->getNumInits()) {
if (Expr *Str = IsStringInit(IList->getInit(Index), arrayType,
SemaRef.Context)) {
// We place the string literal directly into the resulting
// initializer list. This is the only place where the structure
// of the structured initializer list doesn't match exactly,
// because doing so would involve allocating one character
// constant for each string.
if (!VerifyOnly) {
CheckStringInit(Str, DeclType, arrayType, SemaRef);
UpdateStructuredListElement(StructuredList, StructuredIndex, Str);
StructuredList->resizeInits(SemaRef.Context, StructuredIndex);
}
++Index;
return;
}
}
if (const VariableArrayType *VAT = dyn_cast<VariableArrayType>(arrayType)) {
// Check for VLAs; in standard C it would be possible to check this
// earlier, but I don't know where clang accepts VLAs (gcc accepts
// them in all sorts of strange places).
if (!VerifyOnly)
SemaRef.Diag(VAT->getSizeExpr()->getLocStart(),
diag::err_variable_object_no_init)
<< VAT->getSizeExpr()->getSourceRange();
hadError = true;
++Index;
++StructuredIndex;
return;
}
// We might know the maximum number of elements in advance.
llvm::APSInt maxElements(elementIndex.getBitWidth(),
elementIndex.isUnsigned());
bool maxElementsKnown = false;
if (const ConstantArrayType *CAT = dyn_cast<ConstantArrayType>(arrayType)) {
maxElements = CAT->getSize();
elementIndex = elementIndex.extOrTrunc(maxElements.getBitWidth());
elementIndex.setIsUnsigned(maxElements.isUnsigned());
maxElementsKnown = true;
}
QualType elementType = arrayType->getElementType();
while (Index < IList->getNumInits()) {
Expr *Init = IList->getInit(Index);
if (DesignatedInitExpr *DIE = dyn_cast<DesignatedInitExpr>(Init)) {
// If we're not the subobject that matches up with the '{' for
// the designator, we shouldn't be handling the
// designator. Return immediately.
if (!SubobjectIsDesignatorContext)
return;
// Handle this designated initializer. elementIndex will be
// updated to be the next array element we'll initialize.
if (CheckDesignatedInitializer(Entity, IList, DIE, 0,
DeclType, 0, &elementIndex, Index,
StructuredList, StructuredIndex, true,
false)) {
hadError = true;
continue;
}
if (elementIndex.getBitWidth() > maxElements.getBitWidth())
maxElements = maxElements.extend(elementIndex.getBitWidth());
else if (elementIndex.getBitWidth() < maxElements.getBitWidth())
elementIndex = elementIndex.extend(maxElements.getBitWidth());
elementIndex.setIsUnsigned(maxElements.isUnsigned());
// If the array is of incomplete type, keep track of the number of
// elements in the initializer.
if (!maxElementsKnown && elementIndex > maxElements)
maxElements = elementIndex;
continue;
}
// If we know the maximum number of elements, and we've already
// hit it, stop consuming elements in the initializer list.
if (maxElementsKnown && elementIndex == maxElements)
break;
InitializedEntity ElementEntity =
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
InitializedEntity::InitializeElement(SemaRef.Context, StructuredIndex,
Entity);
// Check this element.
CheckSubElementType(ElementEntity, IList, elementType, Index,
StructuredList, StructuredIndex);
++elementIndex;
// If the array is of incomplete type, keep track of the number of
// elements in the initializer.
if (!maxElementsKnown && elementIndex > maxElements)
maxElements = elementIndex;
}
if (!hadError && DeclType->isIncompleteArrayType() && !VerifyOnly) {
// If this is an incomplete array type, the actual type needs to
// be calculated here.
llvm::APSInt Zero(maxElements.getBitWidth(), maxElements.isUnsigned());
if (maxElements == Zero) {
// Sizing an array implicitly to zero is not allowed by ISO C,
// but is supported by GNU.
SemaRef.Diag(IList->getLocStart(),
diag::ext_typecheck_zero_array_size);
}
DeclType = SemaRef.Context.getConstantArrayType(elementType, maxElements,
ArrayType::Normal, 0);
}
if (!hadError && VerifyOnly) {
// Check if there are any members of the array that get value-initialized.
// If so, check if doing that is possible.
// FIXME: This needs to detect holes left by designated initializers too.
if (maxElementsKnown && elementIndex < maxElements)
CheckValueInitializable(InitializedEntity::InitializeElement(
SemaRef.Context, 0, Entity));
}
}
bool InitListChecker::CheckFlexibleArrayInit(const InitializedEntity &Entity,
Expr *InitExpr,
FieldDecl *Field,
bool TopLevelObject) {
// Handle GNU flexible array initializers.
unsigned FlexArrayDiag;
if (isa<InitListExpr>(InitExpr) &&
cast<InitListExpr>(InitExpr)->getNumInits() == 0) {
// Empty flexible array init always allowed as an extension
FlexArrayDiag = diag::ext_flexible_array_init;
} else if (SemaRef.getLangOptions().CPlusPlus) {
// Disallow flexible array init in C++; it is not required for gcc
// compatibility, and it needs work to IRGen correctly in general.
FlexArrayDiag = diag::err_flexible_array_init;
} else if (!TopLevelObject) {
// Disallow flexible array init on non-top-level object
FlexArrayDiag = diag::err_flexible_array_init;
} else if (Entity.getKind() != InitializedEntity::EK_Variable) {
// Disallow flexible array init on anything which is not a variable.
FlexArrayDiag = diag::err_flexible_array_init;
} else if (cast<VarDecl>(Entity.getDecl())->hasLocalStorage()) {
// Disallow flexible array init on local variables.
FlexArrayDiag = diag::err_flexible_array_init;
} else {
// Allow other cases.
FlexArrayDiag = diag::ext_flexible_array_init;
}
if (!VerifyOnly) {
SemaRef.Diag(InitExpr->getSourceRange().getBegin(),
FlexArrayDiag)
<< InitExpr->getSourceRange().getBegin();
SemaRef.Diag(Field->getLocation(), diag::note_flexible_array_member)
<< Field;
}
return FlexArrayDiag != diag::ext_flexible_array_init;
}
void InitListChecker::CheckStructUnionTypes(const InitializedEntity &Entity,
InitListExpr *IList,
QualType DeclType,
RecordDecl::field_iterator Field,
bool SubobjectIsDesignatorContext,
unsigned &Index,
InitListExpr *StructuredList,
unsigned &StructuredIndex,
bool TopLevelObject) {
RecordDecl* structDecl = DeclType->getAs<RecordType>()->getDecl();
// If the record is invalid, some of it's members are invalid. To avoid
// confusion, we forgo checking the intializer for the entire record.
if (structDecl->isInvalidDecl()) {
hadError = true;
return;
}
if (DeclType->isUnionType() && IList->getNumInits() == 0) {
// Value-initialize the first named member of the union.
RecordDecl *RD = DeclType->getAs<RecordType>()->getDecl();
for (RecordDecl::field_iterator FieldEnd = RD->field_end();
Field != FieldEnd; ++Field) {
if (Field->getDeclName()) {
if (VerifyOnly)
CheckValueInitializable(
InitializedEntity::InitializeMember(*Field, &Entity));
else
StructuredList->setInitializedFieldInUnion(*Field);
break;
}
}
return;
}
// If structDecl is a forward declaration, this loop won't do
// anything except look at designated initializers; That's okay,
// because an error should get printed out elsewhere. It might be
// worthwhile to skip over the rest of the initializer, though.
RecordDecl *RD = DeclType->getAs<RecordType>()->getDecl();
RecordDecl::field_iterator FieldEnd = RD->field_end();
bool InitializedSomething = false;
bool CheckForMissingFields = true;
while (Index < IList->getNumInits()) {
Expr *Init = IList->getInit(Index);
if (DesignatedInitExpr *DIE = dyn_cast<DesignatedInitExpr>(Init)) {
// If we're not the subobject that matches up with the '{' for
// the designator, we shouldn't be handling the
// designator. Return immediately.
if (!SubobjectIsDesignatorContext)
return;
// Handle this designated initializer. Field will be updated to
// the next field that we'll be initializing.
if (CheckDesignatedInitializer(Entity, IList, DIE, 0,
DeclType, &Field, 0, Index,
StructuredList, StructuredIndex,
true, TopLevelObject))
hadError = true;
InitializedSomething = true;
// Disable check for missing fields when designators are used.
// This matches gcc behaviour.
CheckForMissingFields = false;
continue;
}
if (Field == FieldEnd) {
// We've run out of fields. We're done.
break;
}
// We've already initialized a member of a union. We're done.
if (InitializedSomething && DeclType->isUnionType())
break;
// If we've hit the flexible array member at the end, we're done.
if (Field->getType()->isIncompleteArrayType())
break;
if (Field->isUnnamedBitfield()) {
// Don't initialize unnamed bitfields, e.g. "int : 20;"
++Field;
continue;
}
// Make sure we can use this declaration.
bool InvalidUse;
if (VerifyOnly)
InvalidUse = !SemaRef.CanUseDecl(*Field);
else
InvalidUse = SemaRef.DiagnoseUseOfDecl(*Field,
IList->getInit(Index)->getLocStart());
if (InvalidUse) {
++Index;
++Field;
hadError = true;
continue;
}
InitializedEntity MemberEntity =
InitializedEntity::InitializeMember(*Field, &Entity);
CheckSubElementType(MemberEntity, IList, Field->getType(), Index,
StructuredList, StructuredIndex);
InitializedSomething = true;
if (DeclType->isUnionType() && !VerifyOnly) {
// Initialize the first field within the union.
StructuredList->setInitializedFieldInUnion(*Field);
}
++Field;
}
// Emit warnings for missing struct field initializers.
if (!VerifyOnly && InitializedSomething && CheckForMissingFields &&
Field != FieldEnd && !Field->getType()->isIncompleteArrayType() &&
!DeclType->isUnionType()) {
// It is possible we have one or more unnamed bitfields remaining.
// Find first (if any) named field and emit warning.
for (RecordDecl::field_iterator it = Field, end = RD->field_end();
it != end; ++it) {
if (!it->isUnnamedBitfield()) {
SemaRef.Diag(IList->getSourceRange().getEnd(),
diag::warn_missing_field_initializers) << it->getName();
break;
}
}
}
// Check that any remaining fields can be value-initialized.
if (VerifyOnly && Field != FieldEnd && !DeclType->isUnionType() &&
!Field->getType()->isIncompleteArrayType()) {
// FIXME: Should check for holes left by designated initializers too.
for (; Field != FieldEnd && !hadError; ++Field) {
if (!Field->isUnnamedBitfield())
CheckValueInitializable(
InitializedEntity::InitializeMember(*Field, &Entity));
}
}
if (Field == FieldEnd || !Field->getType()->isIncompleteArrayType() ||
Index >= IList->getNumInits())
return;
if (CheckFlexibleArrayInit(Entity, IList->getInit(Index), *Field,
TopLevelObject)) {
hadError = true;
++Index;
return;
}
InitializedEntity MemberEntity =
InitializedEntity::InitializeMember(*Field, &Entity);
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
if (isa<InitListExpr>(IList->getInit(Index)))
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
CheckSubElementType(MemberEntity, IList, Field->getType(), Index,
StructuredList, StructuredIndex);
else
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
CheckImplicitInitList(MemberEntity, IList, Field->getType(), Index,
StructuredList, StructuredIndex);
}
/// \brief Expand a field designator that refers to a member of an
/// anonymous struct or union into a series of field designators that
/// refers to the field within the appropriate subobject.
///
static void ExpandAnonymousFieldDesignator(Sema &SemaRef,
DesignatedInitExpr *DIE,
unsigned DesigIdx,
IndirectFieldDecl *IndirectField) {
typedef DesignatedInitExpr::Designator Designator;
// Build the replacement designators.
SmallVector<Designator, 4> Replacements;
for (IndirectFieldDecl::chain_iterator PI = IndirectField->chain_begin(),
PE = IndirectField->chain_end(); PI != PE; ++PI) {
if (PI + 1 == PE)
Replacements.push_back(Designator((IdentifierInfo *)0,
DIE->getDesignator(DesigIdx)->getDotLoc(),
DIE->getDesignator(DesigIdx)->getFieldLoc()));
else
Replacements.push_back(Designator((IdentifierInfo *)0, SourceLocation(),
SourceLocation()));
assert(isa<FieldDecl>(*PI));
Replacements.back().setField(cast<FieldDecl>(*PI));
}
// Expand the current designator into the set of replacement
// designators, so we have a full subobject path down to where the
// member of the anonymous struct/union is actually stored.
DIE->ExpandDesignator(SemaRef.Context, DesigIdx, &Replacements[0],
&Replacements[0] + Replacements.size());
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
/// \brief Given an implicit anonymous field, search the IndirectField that
/// corresponds to FieldName.
static IndirectFieldDecl *FindIndirectFieldDesignator(FieldDecl *AnonField,
IdentifierInfo *FieldName) {
assert(AnonField->isAnonymousStructOrUnion());
Decl *NextDecl = AnonField->getNextDeclInContext();
while (IndirectFieldDecl *IF = dyn_cast<IndirectFieldDecl>(NextDecl)) {
if (FieldName && FieldName == IF->getAnonField()->getIdentifier())
return IF;
NextDecl = NextDecl->getNextDeclInContext();
}
return 0;
}
static DesignatedInitExpr *CloneDesignatedInitExpr(Sema &SemaRef,
DesignatedInitExpr *DIE) {
unsigned NumIndexExprs = DIE->getNumSubExprs() - 1;
SmallVector<Expr*, 4> IndexExprs(NumIndexExprs);
for (unsigned I = 0; I < NumIndexExprs; ++I)
IndexExprs[I] = DIE->getSubExpr(I + 1);
return DesignatedInitExpr::Create(SemaRef.Context, DIE->designators_begin(),
DIE->size(), IndexExprs.data(),
NumIndexExprs, DIE->getEqualOrColonLoc(),
DIE->usesGNUSyntax(), DIE->getInit());
}
namespace {
// Callback to only accept typo corrections that are for field members of
// the given struct or union.
class FieldInitializerValidatorCCC : public CorrectionCandidateCallback {
public:
explicit FieldInitializerValidatorCCC(RecordDecl *RD)
: Record(RD) {}
virtual bool ValidateCandidate(const TypoCorrection &candidate) {
FieldDecl *FD = candidate.getCorrectionDeclAs<FieldDecl>();
return FD && FD->getDeclContext()->getRedeclContext()->Equals(Record);
}
private:
RecordDecl *Record;
};
}
/// @brief Check the well-formedness of a C99 designated initializer.
///
/// Determines whether the designated initializer @p DIE, which
/// resides at the given @p Index within the initializer list @p
/// IList, is well-formed for a current object of type @p DeclType
/// (C99 6.7.8). The actual subobject that this designator refers to
/// within the current subobject is returned in either
/// @p NextField or @p NextElementIndex (whichever is appropriate).
///
/// @param IList The initializer list in which this designated
/// initializer occurs.
///
/// @param DIE The designated initializer expression.
///
/// @param DesigIdx The index of the current designator.
///
/// @param DeclType The type of the "current object" (C99 6.7.8p17),
/// into which the designation in @p DIE should refer.
///
/// @param NextField If non-NULL and the first designator in @p DIE is
/// a field, this will be set to the field declaration corresponding
/// to the field named by the designator.
///
/// @param NextElementIndex If non-NULL and the first designator in @p
/// DIE is an array designator or GNU array-range designator, this
/// will be set to the last index initialized by this designator.
///
/// @param Index Index into @p IList where the designated initializer
/// @p DIE occurs.
///
/// @param StructuredList The initializer list expression that
/// describes all of the subobject initializers in the order they'll
/// actually be initialized.
///
/// @returns true if there was an error, false otherwise.
bool
InitListChecker::CheckDesignatedInitializer(const InitializedEntity &Entity,
InitListExpr *IList,
DesignatedInitExpr *DIE,
unsigned DesigIdx,
QualType &CurrentObjectType,
RecordDecl::field_iterator *NextField,
llvm::APSInt *NextElementIndex,
unsigned &Index,
InitListExpr *StructuredList,
unsigned &StructuredIndex,
bool FinishSubobjectInit,
bool TopLevelObject) {
if (DesigIdx == DIE->size()) {
// Check the actual initialization for the designated object type.
bool prevHadError = hadError;
// Temporarily remove the designator expression from the
// initializer list that the child calls see, so that we don't try
// to re-process the designator.
unsigned OldIndex = Index;
IList->setInit(OldIndex, DIE->getInit());
CheckSubElementType(Entity, IList, CurrentObjectType, Index,
StructuredList, StructuredIndex);
// Restore the designated initializer expression in the syntactic
// form of the initializer list.
if (IList->getInit(OldIndex) != DIE->getInit())
DIE->setInit(IList->getInit(OldIndex));
IList->setInit(OldIndex, DIE);
return hadError && !prevHadError;
}
DesignatedInitExpr::Designator *D = DIE->getDesignator(DesigIdx);
bool IsFirstDesignator = (DesigIdx == 0);
if (!VerifyOnly) {
assert((IsFirstDesignator || StructuredList) &&
"Need a non-designated initializer list to start from");
// Determine the structural initializer list that corresponds to the
// current subobject.
StructuredList = IsFirstDesignator? SyntacticToSemantic[IList]
: getStructuredSubobjectInit(IList, Index, CurrentObjectType,
StructuredList, StructuredIndex,
SourceRange(D->getStartLocation(),
DIE->getSourceRange().getEnd()));
assert(StructuredList && "Expected a structured initializer list");
}
if (D->isFieldDesignator()) {
// C99 6.7.8p7:
//
// If a designator has the form
//
// . identifier
//
// then the current object (defined below) shall have
// structure or union type and the identifier shall be the
// name of a member of that type.
const RecordType *RT = CurrentObjectType->getAs<RecordType>();
if (!RT) {
SourceLocation Loc = D->getDotLoc();
if (Loc.isInvalid())
Loc = D->getFieldLoc();
if (!VerifyOnly)
SemaRef.Diag(Loc, diag::err_field_designator_non_aggr)
<< SemaRef.getLangOptions().CPlusPlus << CurrentObjectType;
++Index;
return true;
}
// Note: we perform a linear search of the fields here, despite
// the fact that we have a faster lookup method, because we always
// need to compute the field's index.
FieldDecl *KnownField = D->getField();
IdentifierInfo *FieldName = D->getFieldName();
unsigned FieldIndex = 0;
RecordDecl::field_iterator
Field = RT->getDecl()->field_begin(),
FieldEnd = RT->getDecl()->field_end();
for (; Field != FieldEnd; ++Field) {
if (Field->isUnnamedBitfield())
continue;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// If we find a field representing an anonymous field, look in the
// IndirectFieldDecl that follow for the designated initializer.
if (!KnownField && Field->isAnonymousStructOrUnion()) {
if (IndirectFieldDecl *IF =
FindIndirectFieldDesignator(*Field, FieldName)) {
// In verify mode, don't modify the original.
if (VerifyOnly)
DIE = CloneDesignatedInitExpr(SemaRef, DIE);
ExpandAnonymousFieldDesignator(SemaRef, DIE, DesigIdx, IF);
D = DIE->getDesignator(DesigIdx);
break;
}
}
if (KnownField && KnownField == *Field)
break;
if (FieldName && FieldName == Field->getIdentifier())
break;
++FieldIndex;
}
if (Field == FieldEnd) {
if (VerifyOnly) {
++Index;
return true; // No typo correction when just trying this out.
}
// There was no normal field in the struct with the designated
// name. Perform another lookup for this name, which may find
// something that we can't designate (e.g., a member function),
// may find nothing, or may find a member of an anonymous
// struct/union.
DeclContext::lookup_result Lookup = RT->getDecl()->lookup(FieldName);
FieldDecl *ReplacementField = 0;
if (Lookup.first == Lookup.second) {
// Name lookup didn't find anything. Determine whether this
// was a typo for another field name.
FieldInitializerValidatorCCC Validator(RT->getDecl());
TypoCorrection Corrected = SemaRef.CorrectTypo(
DeclarationNameInfo(FieldName, D->getFieldLoc()),
Sema::LookupMemberName, /*Scope=*/0, /*SS=*/0, Validator,
RT->getDecl());
if (Corrected) {
std::string CorrectedStr(
Corrected.getAsString(SemaRef.getLangOptions()));
std::string CorrectedQuotedStr(
Corrected.getQuoted(SemaRef.getLangOptions()));
ReplacementField = Corrected.getCorrectionDeclAs<FieldDecl>();
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
SemaRef.Diag(D->getFieldLoc(),
diag::err_field_designator_unknown_suggest)
<< FieldName << CurrentObjectType << CorrectedQuotedStr
<< FixItHint::CreateReplacement(D->getFieldLoc(), CorrectedStr);
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
SemaRef.Diag(ReplacementField->getLocation(),
diag::note_previous_decl) << CorrectedQuotedStr;
hadError = true;
} else {
SemaRef.Diag(D->getFieldLoc(), diag::err_field_designator_unknown)
<< FieldName << CurrentObjectType;
++Index;
return true;
}
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
if (!ReplacementField) {
// Name lookup found something, but it wasn't a field.
SemaRef.Diag(D->getFieldLoc(), diag::err_field_designator_nonfield)
<< FieldName;
SemaRef.Diag((*Lookup.first)->getLocation(),
diag::note_field_designator_found);
++Index;
return true;
}
if (!KnownField) {
// The replacement field comes from typo correction; find it
// in the list of fields.
FieldIndex = 0;
Field = RT->getDecl()->field_begin();
for (; Field != FieldEnd; ++Field) {
if (Field->isUnnamedBitfield())
continue;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
if (ReplacementField == *Field ||
Field->getIdentifier() == ReplacementField->getIdentifier())
break;
++FieldIndex;
}
}
}
// All of the fields of a union are located at the same place in
// the initializer list.
if (RT->getDecl()->isUnion()) {
FieldIndex = 0;
if (!VerifyOnly)
StructuredList->setInitializedFieldInUnion(*Field);
}
// Make sure we can use this declaration.
bool InvalidUse;
if (VerifyOnly)
InvalidUse = !SemaRef.CanUseDecl(*Field);
else
InvalidUse = SemaRef.DiagnoseUseOfDecl(*Field, D->getFieldLoc());
if (InvalidUse) {
++Index;
return true;
}
if (!VerifyOnly) {
// Update the designator with the field declaration.
D->setField(*Field);
// Make sure that our non-designated initializer list has space
// for a subobject corresponding to this field.
if (FieldIndex >= StructuredList->getNumInits())
StructuredList->resizeInits(SemaRef.Context, FieldIndex + 1);
}
// This designator names a flexible array member.
if (Field->getType()->isIncompleteArrayType()) {
bool Invalid = false;
if ((DesigIdx + 1) != DIE->size()) {
// We can't designate an object within the flexible array
// member (because GCC doesn't allow it).
if (!VerifyOnly) {
DesignatedInitExpr::Designator *NextD
= DIE->getDesignator(DesigIdx + 1);
SemaRef.Diag(NextD->getStartLocation(),
diag::err_designator_into_flexible_array_member)
<< SourceRange(NextD->getStartLocation(),
DIE->getSourceRange().getEnd());
SemaRef.Diag(Field->getLocation(), diag::note_flexible_array_member)
<< *Field;
}
Invalid = true;
}
if (!hadError && !isa<InitListExpr>(DIE->getInit()) &&
!isa<StringLiteral>(DIE->getInit())) {
// The initializer is not an initializer list.
if (!VerifyOnly) {
SemaRef.Diag(DIE->getInit()->getSourceRange().getBegin(),
diag::err_flexible_array_init_needs_braces)
<< DIE->getInit()->getSourceRange();
SemaRef.Diag(Field->getLocation(), diag::note_flexible_array_member)
<< *Field;
}
Invalid = true;
}
// Check GNU flexible array initializer.
if (!Invalid && CheckFlexibleArrayInit(Entity, DIE->getInit(), *Field,
TopLevelObject))
Invalid = true;
if (Invalid) {
++Index;
return true;
}
// Initialize the array.
bool prevHadError = hadError;
unsigned newStructuredIndex = FieldIndex;
unsigned OldIndex = Index;
IList->setInit(Index, DIE->getInit());
InitializedEntity MemberEntity =
InitializedEntity::InitializeMember(*Field, &Entity);
CheckSubElementType(MemberEntity, IList, Field->getType(), Index,
StructuredList, newStructuredIndex);
IList->setInit(OldIndex, DIE);
if (hadError && !prevHadError) {
++Field;
++FieldIndex;
if (NextField)
*NextField = Field;
StructuredIndex = FieldIndex;
return true;
}
} else {
// Recurse to check later designated subobjects.
QualType FieldType = (*Field)->getType();
unsigned newStructuredIndex = FieldIndex;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
InitializedEntity MemberEntity =
InitializedEntity::InitializeMember(*Field, &Entity);
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
if (CheckDesignatedInitializer(MemberEntity, IList, DIE, DesigIdx + 1,
FieldType, 0, 0, Index,
StructuredList, newStructuredIndex,
true, false))
return true;
}
// Find the position of the next field to be initialized in this
// subobject.
++Field;
++FieldIndex;
// If this the first designator, our caller will continue checking
// the rest of this struct/class/union subobject.
if (IsFirstDesignator) {
if (NextField)
*NextField = Field;
StructuredIndex = FieldIndex;
return false;
}
if (!FinishSubobjectInit)
return false;
// We've already initialized something in the union; we're done.
if (RT->getDecl()->isUnion())
return hadError;
// Check the remaining fields within this class/struct/union subobject.
bool prevHadError = hadError;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
CheckStructUnionTypes(Entity, IList, CurrentObjectType, Field, false, Index,
StructuredList, FieldIndex);
return hadError && !prevHadError;
}
// C99 6.7.8p6:
//
// If a designator has the form
//
// [ constant-expression ]
//
// then the current object (defined below) shall have array
// type and the expression shall be an integer constant
// expression. If the array is of unknown size, any
// nonnegative value is valid.
//
// Additionally, cope with the GNU extension that permits
// designators of the form
//
// [ constant-expression ... constant-expression ]
const ArrayType *AT = SemaRef.Context.getAsArrayType(CurrentObjectType);
if (!AT) {
if (!VerifyOnly)
SemaRef.Diag(D->getLBracketLoc(), diag::err_array_designator_non_array)
<< CurrentObjectType;
++Index;
return true;
}
Expr *IndexExpr = 0;
llvm::APSInt DesignatedStartIndex, DesignatedEndIndex;
if (D->isArrayDesignator()) {
IndexExpr = DIE->getArrayIndex(*D);
DesignatedStartIndex = IndexExpr->EvaluateKnownConstInt(SemaRef.Context);
DesignatedEndIndex = DesignatedStartIndex;
} else {
assert(D->isArrayRangeDesignator() && "Need array-range designator");
DesignatedStartIndex =
DIE->getArrayRangeStart(*D)->EvaluateKnownConstInt(SemaRef.Context);
DesignatedEndIndex =
DIE->getArrayRangeEnd(*D)->EvaluateKnownConstInt(SemaRef.Context);
IndexExpr = DIE->getArrayRangeEnd(*D);
// Codegen can't handle evaluating array range designators that have side
// effects, because we replicate the AST value for each initialized element.
// As such, set the sawArrayRangeDesignator() bit if we initialize multiple
// elements with something that has a side effect, so codegen can emit an
// "error unsupported" error instead of miscompiling the app.
if (DesignatedStartIndex.getZExtValue()!=DesignatedEndIndex.getZExtValue()&&
DIE->getInit()->HasSideEffects(SemaRef.Context) && !VerifyOnly)
FullyStructuredList->sawArrayRangeDesignator();
}
if (isa<ConstantArrayType>(AT)) {
llvm::APSInt MaxElements(cast<ConstantArrayType>(AT)->getSize(), false);
DesignatedStartIndex
= DesignatedStartIndex.extOrTrunc(MaxElements.getBitWidth());
DesignatedStartIndex.setIsUnsigned(MaxElements.isUnsigned());
DesignatedEndIndex
= DesignatedEndIndex.extOrTrunc(MaxElements.getBitWidth());
DesignatedEndIndex.setIsUnsigned(MaxElements.isUnsigned());
if (DesignatedEndIndex >= MaxElements) {
if (!VerifyOnly)
SemaRef.Diag(IndexExpr->getSourceRange().getBegin(),
diag::err_array_designator_too_large)
<< DesignatedEndIndex.toString(10) << MaxElements.toString(10)
<< IndexExpr->getSourceRange();
++Index;
return true;
}
} else {
// Make sure the bit-widths and signedness match.
if (DesignatedStartIndex.getBitWidth() > DesignatedEndIndex.getBitWidth())
DesignatedEndIndex
= DesignatedEndIndex.extend(DesignatedStartIndex.getBitWidth());
else if (DesignatedStartIndex.getBitWidth() <
DesignatedEndIndex.getBitWidth())
DesignatedStartIndex
= DesignatedStartIndex.extend(DesignatedEndIndex.getBitWidth());
DesignatedStartIndex.setIsUnsigned(true);
DesignatedEndIndex.setIsUnsigned(true);
}
// Make sure that our non-designated initializer list has space
// for a subobject corresponding to this array element.
if (!VerifyOnly &&
DesignatedEndIndex.getZExtValue() >= StructuredList->getNumInits())
StructuredList->resizeInits(SemaRef.Context,
DesignatedEndIndex.getZExtValue() + 1);
// Repeatedly perform subobject initializations in the range
// [DesignatedStartIndex, DesignatedEndIndex].
// Move to the next designator
unsigned ElementIndex = DesignatedStartIndex.getZExtValue();
unsigned OldIndex = Index;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
InitializedEntity ElementEntity =
InitializedEntity::InitializeElement(SemaRef.Context, 0, Entity);
while (DesignatedStartIndex <= DesignatedEndIndex) {
// Recurse to check later designated subobjects.
QualType ElementType = AT->getElementType();
Index = OldIndex;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
ElementEntity.setElementIndex(ElementIndex);
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
if (CheckDesignatedInitializer(ElementEntity, IList, DIE, DesigIdx + 1,
ElementType, 0, 0, Index,
StructuredList, ElementIndex,
(DesignatedStartIndex == DesignatedEndIndex),
false))
return true;
// Move to the next index in the array that we'll be initializing.
++DesignatedStartIndex;
ElementIndex = DesignatedStartIndex.getZExtValue();
}
// If this the first designator, our caller will continue checking
// the rest of this array subobject.
if (IsFirstDesignator) {
if (NextElementIndex)
*NextElementIndex = DesignatedStartIndex;
StructuredIndex = ElementIndex;
return false;
}
if (!FinishSubobjectInit)
return false;
// Check the remaining elements within this array subobject.
bool prevHadError = hadError;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
CheckArrayType(Entity, IList, CurrentObjectType, DesignatedStartIndex,
/*SubobjectIsDesignatorContext=*/false, Index,
StructuredList, ElementIndex);
return hadError && !prevHadError;
}
// Get the structured initializer list for a subobject of type
// @p CurrentObjectType.
InitListExpr *
InitListChecker::getStructuredSubobjectInit(InitListExpr *IList, unsigned Index,
QualType CurrentObjectType,
InitListExpr *StructuredList,
unsigned StructuredIndex,
SourceRange InitRange) {
if (VerifyOnly)
return 0; // No structured list in verification-only mode.
Expr *ExistingInit = 0;
if (!StructuredList)
ExistingInit = SyntacticToSemantic[IList];
else if (StructuredIndex < StructuredList->getNumInits())
ExistingInit = StructuredList->getInit(StructuredIndex);
if (InitListExpr *Result = dyn_cast_or_null<InitListExpr>(ExistingInit))
return Result;
if (ExistingInit) {
// We are creating an initializer list that initializes the
// subobjects of the current object, but there was already an
// initialization that completely initialized the current
// subobject, e.g., by a compound literal:
//
// struct X { int a, b; };
// struct X xs[] = { [0] = (struct X) { 1, 2 }, [0].b = 3 };
//
// Here, xs[0].a == 0 and xs[0].b == 3, since the second,
// designated initializer re-initializes the whole
// subobject [0], overwriting previous initializers.
SemaRef.Diag(InitRange.getBegin(),
diag::warn_subobject_initializer_overrides)
<< InitRange;
SemaRef.Diag(ExistingInit->getSourceRange().getBegin(),
diag::note_previous_initializer)
<< /*FIXME:has side effects=*/0
<< ExistingInit->getSourceRange();
}
InitListExpr *Result
= new (SemaRef.Context) InitListExpr(SemaRef.Context,
InitRange.getBegin(), 0, 0,
InitRange.getEnd());
Result->setType(CurrentObjectType.getNonLValueExprType(SemaRef.Context));
// Pre-allocate storage for the structured initializer list.
unsigned NumElements = 0;
unsigned NumInits = 0;
bool GotNumInits = false;
if (!StructuredList) {
NumInits = IList->getNumInits();
GotNumInits = true;
} else if (Index < IList->getNumInits()) {
if (InitListExpr *SubList = dyn_cast<InitListExpr>(IList->getInit(Index))) {
NumInits = SubList->getNumInits();
GotNumInits = true;
}
}
if (const ArrayType *AType
= SemaRef.Context.getAsArrayType(CurrentObjectType)) {
if (const ConstantArrayType *CAType = dyn_cast<ConstantArrayType>(AType)) {
NumElements = CAType->getSize().getZExtValue();
// Simple heuristic so that we don't allocate a very large
// initializer with many empty entries at the end.
if (GotNumInits && NumElements > NumInits)
NumElements = 0;
}
} else if (const VectorType *VType = CurrentObjectType->getAs<VectorType>())
NumElements = VType->getNumElements();
else if (const RecordType *RType = CurrentObjectType->getAs<RecordType>()) {
RecordDecl *RDecl = RType->getDecl();
if (RDecl->isUnion())
NumElements = 1;
else
NumElements = std::distance(RDecl->field_begin(),
RDecl->field_end());
}
Result->reserveInits(SemaRef.Context, NumElements);
// Link this new initializer list into the structured initializer
// lists.
if (StructuredList)
StructuredList->updateInit(SemaRef.Context, StructuredIndex, Result);
else {
Result->setSyntacticForm(IList);
SyntacticToSemantic[IList] = Result;
}
return Result;
}
/// Update the initializer at index @p StructuredIndex within the
/// structured initializer list to the value @p expr.
void InitListChecker::UpdateStructuredListElement(InitListExpr *StructuredList,
unsigned &StructuredIndex,
Expr *expr) {
// No structured initializer list to update
if (!StructuredList)
return;
if (Expr *PrevInit = StructuredList->updateInit(SemaRef.Context,
StructuredIndex, expr)) {
// This initializer overwrites a previous initializer. Warn.
SemaRef.Diag(expr->getSourceRange().getBegin(),
diag::warn_initializer_overrides)
<< expr->getSourceRange();
SemaRef.Diag(PrevInit->getSourceRange().getBegin(),
diag::note_previous_initializer)
<< /*FIXME:has side effects=*/0
<< PrevInit->getSourceRange();
}
++StructuredIndex;
}
/// Check that the given Index expression is a valid array designator
/// value. This is essentially just a wrapper around
/// VerifyIntegerConstantExpression that also checks for negative values
/// and produces a reasonable diagnostic if there is a
/// failure. Returns the index expression, possibly with an implicit cast
/// added, on success. If everything went okay, Value will receive the
/// value of the constant expression.
static ExprResult
CheckArrayDesignatorExpr(Sema &S, Expr *Index, llvm::APSInt &Value) {
SourceLocation Loc = Index->getSourceRange().getBegin();
// Make sure this is an integer constant expression.
ExprResult Result = S.VerifyIntegerConstantExpression(Index, &Value);
if (Result.isInvalid())
return Result;
if (Value.isSigned() && Value.isNegative())
return S.Diag(Loc, diag::err_array_designator_negative)
<< Value.toString(10) << Index->getSourceRange();
Value.setIsUnsigned(true);
return Result;
}
ExprResult Sema::ActOnDesignatedInitializer(Designation &Desig,
SourceLocation Loc,
bool GNUSyntax,
ExprResult Init) {
typedef DesignatedInitExpr::Designator ASTDesignator;
bool Invalid = false;
SmallVector<ASTDesignator, 32> Designators;
SmallVector<Expr *, 32> InitExpressions;
// Build designators and check array designator expressions.
for (unsigned Idx = 0; Idx < Desig.getNumDesignators(); ++Idx) {
const Designator &D = Desig.getDesignator(Idx);
switch (D.getKind()) {
case Designator::FieldDesignator:
Designators.push_back(ASTDesignator(D.getField(), D.getDotLoc(),
D.getFieldLoc()));
break;
case Designator::ArrayDesignator: {
Expr *Index = static_cast<Expr *>(D.getArrayIndex());
llvm::APSInt IndexValue;
if (!Index->isTypeDependent() && !Index->isValueDependent())
Index = CheckArrayDesignatorExpr(*this, Index, IndexValue).take();
if (!Index)
Invalid = true;
else {
Designators.push_back(ASTDesignator(InitExpressions.size(),
D.getLBracketLoc(),
D.getRBracketLoc()));
InitExpressions.push_back(Index);
}
break;
}
case Designator::ArrayRangeDesignator: {
Expr *StartIndex = static_cast<Expr *>(D.getArrayRangeStart());
Expr *EndIndex = static_cast<Expr *>(D.getArrayRangeEnd());
llvm::APSInt StartValue;
llvm::APSInt EndValue;
bool StartDependent = StartIndex->isTypeDependent() ||
StartIndex->isValueDependent();
bool EndDependent = EndIndex->isTypeDependent() ||
EndIndex->isValueDependent();
if (!StartDependent)
StartIndex =
CheckArrayDesignatorExpr(*this, StartIndex, StartValue).take();
if (!EndDependent)
EndIndex = CheckArrayDesignatorExpr(*this, EndIndex, EndValue).take();
if (!StartIndex || !EndIndex)
Invalid = true;
else {
// Make sure we're comparing values with the same bit width.
if (StartDependent || EndDependent) {
// Nothing to compute.
} else if (StartValue.getBitWidth() > EndValue.getBitWidth())
EndValue = EndValue.extend(StartValue.getBitWidth());
else if (StartValue.getBitWidth() < EndValue.getBitWidth())
StartValue = StartValue.extend(EndValue.getBitWidth());
if (!StartDependent && !EndDependent && EndValue < StartValue) {
Diag(D.getEllipsisLoc(), diag::err_array_designator_empty_range)
<< StartValue.toString(10) << EndValue.toString(10)
<< StartIndex->getSourceRange() << EndIndex->getSourceRange();
Invalid = true;
} else {
Designators.push_back(ASTDesignator(InitExpressions.size(),
D.getLBracketLoc(),
D.getEllipsisLoc(),
D.getRBracketLoc()));
InitExpressions.push_back(StartIndex);
InitExpressions.push_back(EndIndex);
}
}
break;
}
}
}
if (Invalid || Init.isInvalid())
return ExprError();
// Clear out the expressions within the designation.
Desig.ClearExprs(*this);
DesignatedInitExpr *DIE
= DesignatedInitExpr::Create(Context,
Designators.data(), Designators.size(),
InitExpressions.data(), InitExpressions.size(),
Loc, GNUSyntax, Init.takeAs<Expr>());
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
if (!getLangOptions().C99)
Diag(DIE->getLocStart(), diag::ext_designated_init)
<< DIE->getSourceRange();
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
return Owned(DIE);
}
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// Initialization entity
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
InitializedEntity::InitializedEntity(ASTContext &Context, unsigned Index,
const InitializedEntity &Parent)
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
: Parent(&Parent), Index(Index)
{
if (const ArrayType *AT = Context.getAsArrayType(Parent.getType())) {
Kind = EK_ArrayElement;
Type = AT->getElementType();
} else if (const VectorType *VT = Parent.getType()->getAs<VectorType>()) {
Kind = EK_VectorElement;
Type = VT->getElementType();
} else {
const ComplexType *CT = Parent.getType()->getAs<ComplexType>();
assert(CT && "Unexpected type");
Kind = EK_ComplexElement;
Type = CT->getElementType();
}
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
InitializedEntity InitializedEntity::InitializeBase(ASTContext &Context,
CXXBaseSpecifier *Base,
bool IsInheritedVirtualBase)
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
{
InitializedEntity Result;
Result.Kind = EK_Base;
Result.Base = reinterpret_cast<uintptr_t>(Base);
if (IsInheritedVirtualBase)
Result.Base |= 0x01;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
Result.Type = Base->getType();
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
return Result;
}
DeclarationName InitializedEntity::getName() const {
switch (getKind()) {
case EK_Parameter: {
ParmVarDecl *D = reinterpret_cast<ParmVarDecl*>(Parameter & ~0x1);
return (D ? D->getDeclName() : DeclarationName());
}
case EK_Variable:
case EK_Member:
return VariableOrMember->getDeclName();
case EK_Result:
case EK_Exception:
case EK_New:
case EK_Temporary:
case EK_Base:
case EK_Delegating:
case EK_ArrayElement:
case EK_VectorElement:
case EK_ComplexElement:
case EK_BlockElement:
return DeclarationName();
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
llvm_unreachable("Invalid EntityKind!");
}
DeclaratorDecl *InitializedEntity::getDecl() const {
switch (getKind()) {
case EK_Variable:
case EK_Member:
return VariableOrMember;
case EK_Parameter:
return reinterpret_cast<ParmVarDecl*>(Parameter & ~0x1);
case EK_Result:
case EK_Exception:
case EK_New:
case EK_Temporary:
case EK_Base:
case EK_Delegating:
case EK_ArrayElement:
case EK_VectorElement:
case EK_ComplexElement:
case EK_BlockElement:
return 0;
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
llvm_unreachable("Invalid EntityKind!");
}
bool InitializedEntity::allowsNRVO() const {
switch (getKind()) {
case EK_Result:
case EK_Exception:
return LocAndNRVO.NRVO;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case EK_Variable:
case EK_Parameter:
case EK_Member:
case EK_New:
case EK_Temporary:
case EK_Base:
case EK_Delegating:
case EK_ArrayElement:
case EK_VectorElement:
case EK_ComplexElement:
case EK_BlockElement:
break;
}
return false;
}
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// Initialization sequence
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
void InitializationSequence::Step::Destroy() {
switch (Kind) {
case SK_ResolveAddressOfOverloadedFunction:
case SK_CastDerivedToBaseRValue:
case SK_CastDerivedToBaseXValue:
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
case SK_CastDerivedToBaseLValue:
case SK_BindReference:
case SK_BindReferenceToTemporary:
case SK_ExtraneousCopyToTemporary:
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
case SK_UserConversion:
case SK_QualificationConversionRValue:
case SK_QualificationConversionXValue:
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
case SK_QualificationConversionLValue:
case SK_ListInitialization:
case SK_ListConstructorCall:
case SK_UnwrapInitList:
case SK_RewrapInitList:
case SK_ConstructorInitialization:
case SK_ZeroInitialization:
case SK_CAssignment:
case SK_StringInit:
case SK_ObjCObjectConversion:
case SK_ArrayInit:
case SK_PassByIndirectCopyRestore:
case SK_PassByIndirectRestore:
case SK_ProduceObjCObject:
case SK_StdInitializerList:
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
case SK_ConversionSequence:
delete ICS;
}
}
bool InitializationSequence::isDirectReferenceBinding() const {
return !Steps.empty() && Steps.back().Kind == SK_BindReference;
}
bool InitializationSequence::isAmbiguous() const {
if (!Failed())
return false;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
switch (getFailureKind()) {
case FK_TooManyInitsForReference:
case FK_ArrayNeedsInitList:
case FK_ArrayNeedsInitListOrStringLiteral:
case FK_AddressOfOverloadFailed: // FIXME: Could do better
case FK_NonConstLValueReferenceBindingToTemporary:
case FK_NonConstLValueReferenceBindingToUnrelated:
case FK_RValueReferenceBindingToLValue:
case FK_ReferenceInitDropsQualifiers:
case FK_ReferenceInitFailed:
case FK_ConversionFailed:
case FK_ConversionFromPropertyFailed:
case FK_TooManyInitsForScalar:
case FK_ReferenceBindingToInitList:
case FK_InitListBadDestinationType:
case FK_DefaultInitOfConst:
case FK_Incomplete:
case FK_ArrayTypeMismatch:
case FK_NonConstantArrayInit:
case FK_ListInitializationFailed:
case FK_VariableLengthArrayHasInitializer:
case FK_PlaceholderType:
case FK_InitListElementCopyFailure:
return false;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case FK_ReferenceInitOverloadFailed:
case FK_UserConversionOverloadFailed:
case FK_ConstructorOverloadFailed:
case FK_ListConstructorOverloadFailed:
return FailedOverloadResult == OR_Ambiguous;
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
llvm_unreachable("Invalid EntityKind!");
}
bool InitializationSequence::isConstructorInitialization() const {
return !Steps.empty() && Steps.back().Kind == SK_ConstructorInitialization;
}
void
InitializationSequence
::AddAddressOverloadResolutionStep(FunctionDecl *Function,
DeclAccessPair Found,
bool HadMultipleCandidates) {
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
Step S;
S.Kind = SK_ResolveAddressOfOverloadedFunction;
S.Type = Function->getType();
S.Function.HadMultipleCandidates = HadMultipleCandidates;
S.Function.Function = Function;
S.Function.FoundDecl = Found;
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
Steps.push_back(S);
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
void InitializationSequence::AddDerivedToBaseCastStep(QualType BaseType,
ExprValueKind VK) {
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
Step S;
switch (VK) {
case VK_RValue: S.Kind = SK_CastDerivedToBaseRValue; break;
case VK_XValue: S.Kind = SK_CastDerivedToBaseXValue; break;
case VK_LValue: S.Kind = SK_CastDerivedToBaseLValue; break;
}
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
S.Type = BaseType;
Steps.push_back(S);
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
void InitializationSequence::AddReferenceBindingStep(QualType T,
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
bool BindingTemporary) {
Step S;
S.Kind = BindingTemporary? SK_BindReferenceToTemporary : SK_BindReference;
S.Type = T;
Steps.push_back(S);
}
void InitializationSequence::AddExtraneousCopyToTemporary(QualType T) {
Step S;
S.Kind = SK_ExtraneousCopyToTemporary;
S.Type = T;
Steps.push_back(S);
}
void
InitializationSequence::AddUserConversionStep(FunctionDecl *Function,
DeclAccessPair FoundDecl,
QualType T,
bool HadMultipleCandidates) {
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
Step S;
S.Kind = SK_UserConversion;
S.Type = T;
S.Function.HadMultipleCandidates = HadMultipleCandidates;
S.Function.Function = Function;
S.Function.FoundDecl = FoundDecl;
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
Steps.push_back(S);
}
void InitializationSequence::AddQualificationConversionStep(QualType Ty,
ExprValueKind VK) {
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
Step S;
S.Kind = SK_QualificationConversionRValue; // work around a gcc warning
switch (VK) {
case VK_RValue:
S.Kind = SK_QualificationConversionRValue;
break;
case VK_XValue:
S.Kind = SK_QualificationConversionXValue;
break;
case VK_LValue:
S.Kind = SK_QualificationConversionLValue;
break;
}
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
S.Type = Ty;
Steps.push_back(S);
}
void InitializationSequence::AddConversionSequenceStep(
const ImplicitConversionSequence &ICS,
QualType T) {
Step S;
S.Kind = SK_ConversionSequence;
S.Type = T;
S.ICS = new ImplicitConversionSequence(ICS);
Steps.push_back(S);
}
void InitializationSequence::AddListInitializationStep(QualType T) {
Step S;
S.Kind = SK_ListInitialization;
S.Type = T;
Steps.push_back(S);
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
void
InitializationSequence
::AddConstructorInitializationStep(CXXConstructorDecl *Constructor,
AccessSpecifier Access,
QualType T,
bool HadMultipleCandidates,
bool FromInitList) {
Step S;
S.Kind = FromInitList ? SK_ListConstructorCall : SK_ConstructorInitialization;
S.Type = T;
S.Function.HadMultipleCandidates = HadMultipleCandidates;
S.Function.Function = Constructor;
S.Function.FoundDecl = DeclAccessPair::make(Constructor, Access);
Steps.push_back(S);
}
void InitializationSequence::AddZeroInitializationStep(QualType T) {
Step S;
S.Kind = SK_ZeroInitialization;
S.Type = T;
Steps.push_back(S);
}
void InitializationSequence::AddCAssignmentStep(QualType T) {
Step S;
S.Kind = SK_CAssignment;
S.Type = T;
Steps.push_back(S);
}
void InitializationSequence::AddStringInitStep(QualType T) {
Step S;
S.Kind = SK_StringInit;
S.Type = T;
Steps.push_back(S);
}
void InitializationSequence::AddObjCObjectConversionStep(QualType T) {
Step S;
S.Kind = SK_ObjCObjectConversion;
S.Type = T;
Steps.push_back(S);
}
void InitializationSequence::AddArrayInitStep(QualType T) {
Step S;
S.Kind = SK_ArrayInit;
S.Type = T;
Steps.push_back(S);
}
void InitializationSequence::AddPassByIndirectCopyRestoreStep(QualType type,
bool shouldCopy) {
Step s;
s.Kind = (shouldCopy ? SK_PassByIndirectCopyRestore
: SK_PassByIndirectRestore);
s.Type = type;
Steps.push_back(s);
}
void InitializationSequence::AddProduceObjCObjectStep(QualType T) {
Step S;
S.Kind = SK_ProduceObjCObject;
S.Type = T;
Steps.push_back(S);
}
void InitializationSequence::AddStdInitializerListConstructionStep(QualType T) {
Step S;
S.Kind = SK_StdInitializerList;
S.Type = T;
Steps.push_back(S);
}
void InitializationSequence::RewrapReferenceInitList(QualType T,
InitListExpr *Syntactic) {
assert(Syntactic->getNumInits() == 1 &&
"Can only rewrap trivial init lists.");
Step S;
S.Kind = SK_UnwrapInitList;
S.Type = Syntactic->getInit(0)->getType();
Steps.insert(Steps.begin(), S);
S.Kind = SK_RewrapInitList;
S.Type = T;
S.WrappingSyntacticList = Syntactic;
Steps.push_back(S);
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
void InitializationSequence::SetOverloadFailure(FailureKind Failure,
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
OverloadingResult Result) {
setSequenceKind(FailedSequence);
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
this->Failure = Failure;
this->FailedOverloadResult = Result;
}
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// Attempt initialization
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
static void MaybeProduceObjCObject(Sema &S,
InitializationSequence &Sequence,
const InitializedEntity &Entity) {
if (!S.getLangOptions().ObjCAutoRefCount) return;
/// When initializing a parameter, produce the value if it's marked
/// __attribute__((ns_consumed)).
if (Entity.getKind() == InitializedEntity::EK_Parameter) {
if (!Entity.isParameterConsumed())
return;
assert(Entity.getType()->isObjCRetainableType() &&
"consuming an object of unretainable type?");
Sequence.AddProduceObjCObjectStep(Entity.getType());
/// When initializing a return value, if the return type is a
/// retainable type, then returns need to immediately retain the
/// object. If an autorelease is required, it will be done at the
/// last instant.
} else if (Entity.getKind() == InitializedEntity::EK_Result) {
if (!Entity.getType()->isObjCRetainableType())
return;
Sequence.AddProduceObjCObjectStep(Entity.getType());
}
}
/// \brief When initializing from init list via constructor, deal with the
/// empty init list and std::initializer_list special cases.
///
/// \return True if this was a special case, false otherwise.
static bool TryListConstructionSpecialCases(Sema &S,
InitListExpr *List,
CXXRecordDecl *DestRecordDecl,
QualType DestType,
InitializationSequence &Sequence) {
// C++11 [dcl.init.list]p3:
// List-initialization of an object of type T is defined as follows:
// - If the initializer list has no elements and T is a class type with
// a default constructor, the object is value-initialized.
if (List->getNumInits() == 0) {
if (CXXConstructorDecl *DefaultConstructor =
S.LookupDefaultConstructor(DestRecordDecl)) {
if (DefaultConstructor->isDeleted() ||
S.isFunctionConsideredUnavailable(DefaultConstructor)) {
// Fake an overload resolution failure.
OverloadCandidateSet &CandidateSet = Sequence.getFailedCandidateSet();
DeclAccessPair FoundDecl = DeclAccessPair::make(DefaultConstructor,
DefaultConstructor->getAccess());
if (FunctionTemplateDecl *ConstructorTmpl =
dyn_cast<FunctionTemplateDecl>(DefaultConstructor))
S.AddTemplateOverloadCandidate(ConstructorTmpl, FoundDecl,
/*ExplicitArgs*/ 0,
0, 0, CandidateSet,
/*SuppressUserConversions*/ false);
else
S.AddOverloadCandidate(DefaultConstructor, FoundDecl,
0, 0, CandidateSet,
/*SuppressUserConversions*/ false);
Sequence.SetOverloadFailure(
InitializationSequence::FK_ListConstructorOverloadFailed,
OR_Deleted);
} else
Sequence.AddConstructorInitializationStep(DefaultConstructor,
DefaultConstructor->getAccess(),
DestType,
/*MultipleCandidates=*/false,
/*FromInitList=*/true);
return true;
}
}
// - Otherwise, if T is a specialization of std::initializer_list, [...]
QualType E;
if (S.isStdInitializerList(DestType, &E)) {
// Check that each individual element can be copy-constructed. But since we
// have no place to store further information, we'll recalculate everything
// later.
InitializedEntity HiddenArray = InitializedEntity::InitializeTemporary(
S.Context.getConstantArrayType(E,
llvm::APInt(S.Context.getTypeSize(S.Context.getSizeType()),
List->getNumInits()),
ArrayType::Normal, 0));
InitializedEntity Element = InitializedEntity::InitializeElement(S.Context,
0, HiddenArray);
for (unsigned i = 0, n = List->getNumInits(); i < n; ++i) {
Element.setElementIndex(i);
if (!S.CanPerformCopyInitialization(Element, List->getInit(i))) {
Sequence.SetFailed(
InitializationSequence::FK_InitListElementCopyFailure);
return true;
}
}
Sequence.AddStdInitializerListConstructionStep(DestType);
return true;
}
// Not a special case.
return false;
}
/// \brief Attempt initialization by constructor (C++ [dcl.init]), which
/// enumerates the constructors of the initialized entity and performs overload
/// resolution to select the best.
/// If InitListSyntax is true, this is list-initialization of a non-aggregate
/// class type.
static void TryConstructorInitialization(Sema &S,
const InitializedEntity &Entity,
const InitializationKind &Kind,
Expr **Args, unsigned NumArgs,
QualType DestType,
InitializationSequence &Sequence,
bool InitListSyntax = false) {
assert((!InitListSyntax || (NumArgs == 1 && isa<InitListExpr>(Args[0]))) &&
"InitListSyntax must come with a single initializer list argument.");
// Check constructor arguments for self reference.
if (DeclaratorDecl *DD = Entity.getDecl())
// Parameters arguments are occassionially constructed with itself,
// for instance, in recursive functions. Skip them.
if (!isa<ParmVarDecl>(DD))
for (unsigned i = 0; i < NumArgs; ++i)
S.CheckSelfReference(DD, Args[i]);
// Build the candidate set directly in the initialization sequence
// structure, so that it will persist if we fail.
OverloadCandidateSet &CandidateSet = Sequence.getFailedCandidateSet();
CandidateSet.clear();
// Determine whether we are allowed to call explicit constructors or
// explicit conversion operators.
bool AllowExplicit = (Kind.getKind() == InitializationKind::IK_Direct ||
Kind.getKind() == InitializationKind::IK_Value ||
Kind.getKind() == InitializationKind::IK_Default);
// The type we're constructing needs to be complete.
if (S.RequireCompleteType(Kind.getLocation(), DestType, 0)) {
Sequence.SetFailed(InitializationSequence::FK_Incomplete);
}
const RecordType *DestRecordType = DestType->getAs<RecordType>();
assert(DestRecordType && "Constructor initialization requires record type");
CXXRecordDecl *DestRecordDecl
= cast<CXXRecordDecl>(DestRecordType->getDecl());
if (InitListSyntax &&
TryListConstructionSpecialCases(S, cast<InitListExpr>(Args[0]),
DestRecordDecl, DestType, Sequence))
return;
if (InitListSyntax) {
// Time to unwrap the init list.
InitListExpr *ILE = cast<InitListExpr>(Args[0]);
Args = ILE->getInits();
NumArgs = ILE->getNumInits();
}
// - Otherwise, if T is a class type, constructors are considered. The
// applicable constructors are enumerated, and the best one is chosen
// through overload resolution.
DeclContext::lookup_iterator Con, ConEnd;
for (llvm::tie(Con, ConEnd) = S.LookupConstructors(DestRecordDecl);
Con != ConEnd; ++Con) {
NamedDecl *D = *Con;
DeclAccessPair FoundDecl = DeclAccessPair::make(D, D->getAccess());
bool SuppressUserConversions = false;
// Find the constructor (which may be a template).
CXXConstructorDecl *Constructor = 0;
FunctionTemplateDecl *ConstructorTmpl = dyn_cast<FunctionTemplateDecl>(D);
if (ConstructorTmpl)
Constructor = cast<CXXConstructorDecl>(
ConstructorTmpl->getTemplatedDecl());
else {
Constructor = cast<CXXConstructorDecl>(D);
// If we're performing copy initialization using a copy constructor, we
// suppress user-defined conversions on the arguments.
// FIXME: Move constructors?
if (Kind.getKind() == InitializationKind::IK_Copy &&
Constructor->isCopyConstructor())
SuppressUserConversions = true;
}
if (!Constructor->isInvalidDecl() &&
(AllowExplicit || !Constructor->isExplicit())) {
if (ConstructorTmpl)
S.AddTemplateOverloadCandidate(ConstructorTmpl, FoundDecl,
/*ExplicitArgs*/ 0,
Args, NumArgs, CandidateSet,
SuppressUserConversions);
else
S.AddOverloadCandidate(Constructor, FoundDecl,
Args, NumArgs, CandidateSet,
SuppressUserConversions);
}
}
SourceLocation DeclLoc = Kind.getLocation();
// Perform overload resolution. If it fails, return the failed result.
OverloadCandidateSet::iterator Best;
if (OverloadingResult Result
= CandidateSet.BestViableFunction(S, DeclLoc, Best)) {
Sequence.SetOverloadFailure(InitListSyntax ?
InitializationSequence::FK_ListConstructorOverloadFailed :
InitializationSequence::FK_ConstructorOverloadFailed,
Result);
return;
}
// C++0x [dcl.init]p6:
// If a program calls for the default initialization of an object
// of a const-qualified type T, T shall be a class type with a
// user-provided default constructor.
if (Kind.getKind() == InitializationKind::IK_Default &&
Entity.getType().isConstQualified() &&
cast<CXXConstructorDecl>(Best->Function)->isImplicit()) {
Sequence.SetFailed(InitializationSequence::FK_DefaultInitOfConst);
return;
}
// Add the constructor initialization step. Any cv-qualification conversion is
// subsumed by the initialization.
bool HadMultipleCandidates = (CandidateSet.size() > 1);
CXXConstructorDecl *CtorDecl = cast<CXXConstructorDecl>(Best->Function);
Sequence.AddConstructorInitializationStep(CtorDecl,
Best->FoundDecl.getAccess(),
DestType, HadMultipleCandidates,
InitListSyntax);
}
static bool
ResolveOverloadedFunctionForReferenceBinding(Sema &S,
Expr *Initializer,
QualType &SourceType,
QualType &UnqualifiedSourceType,
QualType UnqualifiedTargetType,
InitializationSequence &Sequence) {
if (S.Context.getCanonicalType(UnqualifiedSourceType) ==
S.Context.OverloadTy) {
DeclAccessPair Found;
bool HadMultipleCandidates = false;
if (FunctionDecl *Fn
= S.ResolveAddressOfOverloadedFunction(Initializer,
UnqualifiedTargetType,
false, Found,
&HadMultipleCandidates)) {
Sequence.AddAddressOverloadResolutionStep(Fn, Found,
HadMultipleCandidates);
SourceType = Fn->getType();
UnqualifiedSourceType = SourceType.getUnqualifiedType();
} else if (!UnqualifiedTargetType->isRecordType()) {
Sequence.SetFailed(InitializationSequence::FK_AddressOfOverloadFailed);
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
static void TryReferenceInitializationCore(Sema &S,
const InitializedEntity &Entity,
const InitializationKind &Kind,
Expr *Initializer,
QualType cv1T1, QualType T1,
Qualifiers T1Quals,
QualType cv2T2, QualType T2,
Qualifiers T2Quals,
InitializationSequence &Sequence);
static void TryListInitialization(Sema &S,
const InitializedEntity &Entity,
const InitializationKind &Kind,
InitListExpr *InitList,
InitializationSequence &Sequence);
/// \brief Attempt list initialization of a reference.
static void TryReferenceListInitialization(Sema &S,
const InitializedEntity &Entity,
const InitializationKind &Kind,
InitListExpr *InitList,
InitializationSequence &Sequence)
{
// First, catch C++03 where this isn't possible.
if (!S.getLangOptions().CPlusPlus0x) {
Sequence.SetFailed(InitializationSequence::FK_ReferenceBindingToInitList);
return;
}
QualType DestType = Entity.getType();
QualType cv1T1 = DestType->getAs<ReferenceType>()->getPointeeType();
Qualifiers T1Quals;
QualType T1 = S.Context.getUnqualifiedArrayType(cv1T1, T1Quals);
// Reference initialization via an initializer list works thus:
// If the initializer list consists of a single element that is
// reference-related to the referenced type, bind directly to that element
// (possibly creating temporaries).
// Otherwise, initialize a temporary with the initializer list and
// bind to that.
if (InitList->getNumInits() == 1) {
Expr *Initializer = InitList->getInit(0);
QualType cv2T2 = Initializer->getType();
Qualifiers T2Quals;
QualType T2 = S.Context.getUnqualifiedArrayType(cv2T2, T2Quals);
// If this fails, creating a temporary wouldn't work either.
if (ResolveOverloadedFunctionForReferenceBinding(S, Initializer, cv2T2, T2,
T1, Sequence))
return;
SourceLocation DeclLoc = Initializer->getLocStart();
bool dummy1, dummy2, dummy3;
Sema::ReferenceCompareResult RefRelationship
= S.CompareReferenceRelationship(DeclLoc, cv1T1, cv2T2, dummy1,
dummy2, dummy3);
if (RefRelationship >= Sema::Ref_Related) {
// Try to bind the reference here.
TryReferenceInitializationCore(S, Entity, Kind, Initializer, cv1T1, T1,
T1Quals, cv2T2, T2, T2Quals, Sequence);
if (Sequence)
Sequence.RewrapReferenceInitList(cv1T1, InitList);
return;
}
}
// Not reference-related. Create a temporary and bind to that.
InitializedEntity TempEntity = InitializedEntity::InitializeTemporary(cv1T1);
TryListInitialization(S, TempEntity, Kind, InitList, Sequence);
if (Sequence) {
if (DestType->isRValueReferenceType() ||
(T1Quals.hasConst() && !T1Quals.hasVolatile()))
Sequence.AddReferenceBindingStep(cv1T1, /*bindingTemporary=*/true);
else
Sequence.SetFailed(
InitializationSequence::FK_NonConstLValueReferenceBindingToTemporary);
}
}
/// \brief Attempt list initialization (C++0x [dcl.init.list])
static void TryListInitialization(Sema &S,
const InitializedEntity &Entity,
const InitializationKind &Kind,
InitListExpr *InitList,
InitializationSequence &Sequence) {
QualType DestType = Entity.getType();
// C++ doesn't allow scalar initialization with more than one argument.
// But C99 complex numbers are scalars and it makes sense there.
if (S.getLangOptions().CPlusPlus && DestType->isScalarType() &&
!DestType->isAnyComplexType() && InitList->getNumInits() > 1) {
Sequence.SetFailed(InitializationSequence::FK_TooManyInitsForScalar);
return;
}
if (DestType->isReferenceType()) {
TryReferenceListInitialization(S, Entity, Kind, InitList, Sequence);
return;
}
if (DestType->isRecordType() && !DestType->isAggregateType()) {
if (S.getLangOptions().CPlusPlus0x) {
Expr *Arg = InitList;
TryConstructorInitialization(S, Entity, Kind, &Arg, 1, DestType,
Sequence, /*InitListSyntax=*/true);
} else
Sequence.SetFailed(InitializationSequence::FK_InitListBadDestinationType);
return;
}
InitListChecker CheckInitList(S, Entity, InitList,
DestType, /*VerifyOnly=*/true,
Kind.getKind() != InitializationKind::IK_Direct ||
!S.getLangOptions().CPlusPlus0x);
if (CheckInitList.HadError()) {
Sequence.SetFailed(InitializationSequence::FK_ListInitializationFailed);
return;
}
// Add the list initialization step with the built init list.
Sequence.AddListInitializationStep(DestType);
}
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
/// \brief Try a reference initialization that involves calling a conversion
/// function.
static OverloadingResult TryRefInitWithConversionFunction(Sema &S,
const InitializedEntity &Entity,
const InitializationKind &Kind,
Expr *Initializer,
bool AllowRValues,
InitializationSequence &Sequence) {
QualType DestType = Entity.getType();
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
QualType cv1T1 = DestType->getAs<ReferenceType>()->getPointeeType();
QualType T1 = cv1T1.getUnqualifiedType();
QualType cv2T2 = Initializer->getType();
QualType T2 = cv2T2.getUnqualifiedType();
bool DerivedToBase;
bool ObjCConversion;
bool ObjCLifetimeConversion;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
assert(!S.CompareReferenceRelationship(Initializer->getLocStart(),
T1, T2, DerivedToBase,
ObjCConversion,
ObjCLifetimeConversion) &&
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
"Must have incompatible references when binding via conversion");
(void)DerivedToBase;
(void)ObjCConversion;
(void)ObjCLifetimeConversion;
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// Build the candidate set directly in the initialization sequence
// structure, so that it will persist if we fail.
OverloadCandidateSet &CandidateSet = Sequence.getFailedCandidateSet();
CandidateSet.clear();
// Determine whether we are allowed to call explicit constructors or
// explicit conversion operators.
bool AllowExplicit = Kind.getKind() == InitializationKind::IK_Direct;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
const RecordType *T1RecordType = 0;
if (AllowRValues && (T1RecordType = T1->getAs<RecordType>()) &&
!S.RequireCompleteType(Kind.getLocation(), T1, 0)) {
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// The type we're converting to is a class type. Enumerate its constructors
// to see if there is a suitable conversion.
CXXRecordDecl *T1RecordDecl = cast<CXXRecordDecl>(T1RecordType->getDecl());
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
DeclContext::lookup_iterator Con, ConEnd;
for (llvm::tie(Con, ConEnd) = S.LookupConstructors(T1RecordDecl);
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
Con != ConEnd; ++Con) {
NamedDecl *D = *Con;
DeclAccessPair FoundDecl = DeclAccessPair::make(D, D->getAccess());
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// Find the constructor (which may be a template).
CXXConstructorDecl *Constructor = 0;
FunctionTemplateDecl *ConstructorTmpl = dyn_cast<FunctionTemplateDecl>(D);
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
if (ConstructorTmpl)
Constructor = cast<CXXConstructorDecl>(
ConstructorTmpl->getTemplatedDecl());
else
Constructor = cast<CXXConstructorDecl>(D);
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
if (!Constructor->isInvalidDecl() &&
Constructor->isConvertingConstructor(AllowExplicit)) {
if (ConstructorTmpl)
S.AddTemplateOverloadCandidate(ConstructorTmpl, FoundDecl,
/*ExplicitArgs*/ 0,
&Initializer, 1, CandidateSet,
/*SuppressUserConversions=*/true);
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
else
S.AddOverloadCandidate(Constructor, FoundDecl,
&Initializer, 1, CandidateSet,
/*SuppressUserConversions=*/true);
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
}
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
}
if (T1RecordType && T1RecordType->getDecl()->isInvalidDecl())
return OR_No_Viable_Function;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
const RecordType *T2RecordType = 0;
if ((T2RecordType = T2->getAs<RecordType>()) &&
!S.RequireCompleteType(Kind.getLocation(), T2, 0)) {
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// The type we're converting from is a class type, enumerate its conversion
// functions.
CXXRecordDecl *T2RecordDecl = cast<CXXRecordDecl>(T2RecordType->getDecl());
const UnresolvedSetImpl *Conversions
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
= T2RecordDecl->getVisibleConversionFunctions();
for (UnresolvedSetImpl::const_iterator I = Conversions->begin(),
E = Conversions->end(); I != E; ++I) {
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
NamedDecl *D = *I;
CXXRecordDecl *ActingDC = cast<CXXRecordDecl>(D->getDeclContext());
if (isa<UsingShadowDecl>(D))
D = cast<UsingShadowDecl>(D)->getTargetDecl();
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
FunctionTemplateDecl *ConvTemplate = dyn_cast<FunctionTemplateDecl>(D);
CXXConversionDecl *Conv;
if (ConvTemplate)
Conv = cast<CXXConversionDecl>(ConvTemplate->getTemplatedDecl());
else
Conv = cast<CXXConversionDecl>(D);
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// If the conversion function doesn't return a reference type,
// it can't be considered for this conversion unless we're allowed to
// consider rvalues.
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// FIXME: Do we need to make sure that we only consider conversion
// candidates with reference-compatible results? That might be needed to
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// break recursion.
if ((AllowExplicit || !Conv->isExplicit()) &&
(AllowRValues || Conv->getConversionType()->isLValueReferenceType())){
if (ConvTemplate)
S.AddTemplateConversionCandidate(ConvTemplate, I.getPair(),
ActingDC, Initializer,
DestType, CandidateSet);
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
else
S.AddConversionCandidate(Conv, I.getPair(), ActingDC,
Initializer, DestType, CandidateSet);
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
}
}
}
if (T2RecordType && T2RecordType->getDecl()->isInvalidDecl())
return OR_No_Viable_Function;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
SourceLocation DeclLoc = Initializer->getLocStart();
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// Perform overload resolution. If it fails, return the failed result.
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
OverloadCandidateSet::iterator Best;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
if (OverloadingResult Result
= CandidateSet.BestViableFunction(S, DeclLoc, Best, true))
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
return Result;
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
FunctionDecl *Function = Best->Function;
// This is the overload that will actually be used for the initialization, so
// mark it as used.
S.MarkFunctionReferenced(DeclLoc, Function);
// Compute the returned type of the conversion.
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
if (isa<CXXConversionDecl>(Function))
T2 = Function->getResultType();
else
T2 = cv1T1;
// Add the user-defined conversion step.
bool HadMultipleCandidates = (CandidateSet.size() > 1);
Sequence.AddUserConversionStep(Function, Best->FoundDecl,
T2.getNonLValueExprType(S.Context),
HadMultipleCandidates);
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// Determine whether we need to perform derived-to-base or
// cv-qualification adjustments.
ExprValueKind VK = VK_RValue;
if (T2->isLValueReferenceType())
VK = VK_LValue;
else if (const RValueReferenceType *RRef = T2->getAs<RValueReferenceType>())
VK = RRef->getPointeeType()->isFunctionType() ? VK_LValue : VK_XValue;
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
bool NewDerivedToBase = false;
bool NewObjCConversion = false;
bool NewObjCLifetimeConversion = false;
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
Sema::ReferenceCompareResult NewRefRelationship
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
= S.CompareReferenceRelationship(DeclLoc, T1,
T2.getNonLValueExprType(S.Context),
NewDerivedToBase, NewObjCConversion,
NewObjCLifetimeConversion);
if (NewRefRelationship == Sema::Ref_Incompatible) {
// If the type we've converted to is not reference-related to the
// type we're looking for, then there is another conversion step
// we need to perform to produce a temporary of the right type
// that we'll be binding to.
ImplicitConversionSequence ICS;
ICS.setStandard();
ICS.Standard = Best->FinalConversion;
T2 = ICS.Standard.getToType(2);
Sequence.AddConversionSequenceStep(ICS, T2);
} else if (NewDerivedToBase)
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
Sequence.AddDerivedToBaseCastStep(
S.Context.getQualifiedType(T1,
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
T2.getNonReferenceType().getQualifiers()),
VK);
else if (NewObjCConversion)
Sequence.AddObjCObjectConversionStep(
S.Context.getQualifiedType(T1,
T2.getNonReferenceType().getQualifiers()));
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
if (cv1T1.getQualifiers() != T2.getNonReferenceType().getQualifiers())
Sequence.AddQualificationConversionStep(cv1T1, VK);
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
Sequence.AddReferenceBindingStep(cv1T1, !T2->isReferenceType());
return OR_Success;
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
static void CheckCXX98CompatAccessibleCopy(Sema &S,
const InitializedEntity &Entity,
Expr *CurInitExpr);
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
/// \brief Attempt reference initialization (C++0x [dcl.init.ref])
static void TryReferenceInitialization(Sema &S,
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
const InitializedEntity &Entity,
const InitializationKind &Kind,
Expr *Initializer,
InitializationSequence &Sequence) {
QualType DestType = Entity.getType();
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
QualType cv1T1 = DestType->getAs<ReferenceType>()->getPointeeType();
Qualifiers T1Quals;
QualType T1 = S.Context.getUnqualifiedArrayType(cv1T1, T1Quals);
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
QualType cv2T2 = Initializer->getType();
Qualifiers T2Quals;
QualType T2 = S.Context.getUnqualifiedArrayType(cv2T2, T2Quals);
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// If the initializer is the address of an overloaded function, try
// to resolve the overloaded function. If all goes well, T2 is the
// type of the resulting function.
if (ResolveOverloadedFunctionForReferenceBinding(S, Initializer, cv2T2, T2,
T1, Sequence))
return;
// Delegate everything else to a subfunction.
TryReferenceInitializationCore(S, Entity, Kind, Initializer, cv1T1, T1,
T1Quals, cv2T2, T2, T2Quals, Sequence);
}
/// \brief Reference initialization without resolving overloaded functions.
static void TryReferenceInitializationCore(Sema &S,
const InitializedEntity &Entity,
const InitializationKind &Kind,
Expr *Initializer,
QualType cv1T1, QualType T1,
Qualifiers T1Quals,
QualType cv2T2, QualType T2,
Qualifiers T2Quals,
InitializationSequence &Sequence) {
QualType DestType = Entity.getType();
SourceLocation DeclLoc = Initializer->getLocStart();
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// Compute some basic properties of the types and the initializer.
bool isLValueRef = DestType->isLValueReferenceType();
bool isRValueRef = !isLValueRef;
bool DerivedToBase = false;
bool ObjCConversion = false;
bool ObjCLifetimeConversion = false;
Expr::Classification InitCategory = Initializer->Classify(S.Context);
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
Sema::ReferenceCompareResult RefRelationship
= S.CompareReferenceRelationship(DeclLoc, cv1T1, cv2T2, DerivedToBase,
ObjCConversion, ObjCLifetimeConversion);
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// C++0x [dcl.init.ref]p5:
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// A reference to type "cv1 T1" is initialized by an expression of type
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// "cv2 T2" as follows:
//
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// - If the reference is an lvalue reference and the initializer
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// expression
// Note the analogous bullet points for rvlaue refs to functions. Because
// there are no function rvalues in C++, rvalue refs to functions are treated
// like lvalue refs.
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
OverloadingResult ConvOvlResult = OR_Success;
bool T1Function = T1->isFunctionType();
if (isLValueRef || T1Function) {
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
if (InitCategory.isLValue() &&
(RefRelationship >= Sema::Ref_Compatible_With_Added_Qualification ||
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
(Kind.isCStyleOrFunctionalCast() &&
RefRelationship == Sema::Ref_Related))) {
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// - is an lvalue (but is not a bit-field), and "cv1 T1" is
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// reference-compatible with "cv2 T2," or
//
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// Per C++ [over.best.ics]p2, we don't diagnose whether the lvalue is a
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// bit-field when we're determining whether the reference initialization
// can occur. However, we do pay attention to whether it is a bit-field
// to decide whether we're actually binding to a temporary created from
// the bit-field.
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
if (DerivedToBase)
Sequence.AddDerivedToBaseCastStep(
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
S.Context.getQualifiedType(T1, T2Quals),
VK_LValue);
else if (ObjCConversion)
Sequence.AddObjCObjectConversionStep(
S.Context.getQualifiedType(T1, T2Quals));
if (T1Quals != T2Quals)
Sequence.AddQualificationConversionStep(cv1T1, VK_LValue);
bool BindingTemporary = T1Quals.hasConst() && !T1Quals.hasVolatile() &&
(Initializer->getBitField() || Initializer->refersToVectorElement());
Sequence.AddReferenceBindingStep(cv1T1, BindingTemporary);
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
return;
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// - has a class type (i.e., T2 is a class type), where T1 is not
// reference-related to T2, and can be implicitly converted to an
// lvalue of type "cv3 T3," where "cv1 T1" is reference-compatible
// with "cv3 T3" (this conversion is selected by enumerating the
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// applicable conversion functions (13.3.1.6) and choosing the best
// one through overload resolution (13.3)),
// If we have an rvalue ref to function type here, the rhs must be
// an rvalue.
if (RefRelationship == Sema::Ref_Incompatible && T2->isRecordType() &&
(isLValueRef || InitCategory.isRValue())) {
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
ConvOvlResult = TryRefInitWithConversionFunction(S, Entity, Kind,
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
Initializer,
/*AllowRValues=*/isRValueRef,
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
Sequence);
if (ConvOvlResult == OR_Success)
return;
if (ConvOvlResult != OR_No_Viable_Function) {
Sequence.SetOverloadFailure(
InitializationSequence::FK_ReferenceInitOverloadFailed,
ConvOvlResult);
}
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
}
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// - Otherwise, the reference shall be an lvalue reference to a
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// non-volatile const type (i.e., cv1 shall be const), or the reference
// shall be an rvalue reference.
if (isLValueRef && !(T1Quals.hasConst() && !T1Quals.hasVolatile())) {
if (S.Context.getCanonicalType(T2) == S.Context.OverloadTy)
Sequence.SetFailed(InitializationSequence::FK_AddressOfOverloadFailed);
else if (ConvOvlResult && !Sequence.getFailedCandidateSet().empty())
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
Sequence.SetOverloadFailure(
InitializationSequence::FK_ReferenceInitOverloadFailed,
ConvOvlResult);
else
Sequence.SetFailed(InitCategory.isLValue()
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
? (RefRelationship == Sema::Ref_Related
? InitializationSequence::FK_ReferenceInitDropsQualifiers
: InitializationSequence::FK_NonConstLValueReferenceBindingToUnrelated)
: InitializationSequence::FK_NonConstLValueReferenceBindingToTemporary);
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
return;
}
// - If the initializer expression
// - is an xvalue, class prvalue, array prvalue, or function lvalue and
// "cv1 T1" is reference-compatible with "cv2 T2"
// Note: functions are handled below.
if (!T1Function &&
(RefRelationship >= Sema::Ref_Compatible_With_Added_Qualification ||
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
(Kind.isCStyleOrFunctionalCast() &&
RefRelationship == Sema::Ref_Related)) &&
(InitCategory.isXValue() ||
(InitCategory.isPRValue() && T2->isRecordType()) ||
(InitCategory.isPRValue() && T2->isArrayType()))) {
ExprValueKind ValueKind = InitCategory.isXValue()? VK_XValue : VK_RValue;
if (InitCategory.isPRValue() && T2->isRecordType()) {
// The corresponding bullet in C++03 [dcl.init.ref]p5 gives the
// compiler the freedom to perform a copy here or bind to the
// object, while C++0x requires that we bind directly to the
// object. Hence, we always bind to the object without making an
// extra copy. However, in C++03 requires that we check for the
// presence of a suitable copy constructor:
//
// The constructor that would be used to make the copy shall
// be callable whether or not the copy is actually done.
if (!S.getLangOptions().CPlusPlus0x && !S.getLangOptions().MicrosoftExt)
Sequence.AddExtraneousCopyToTemporary(cv2T2);
else if (S.getLangOptions().CPlusPlus0x)
CheckCXX98CompatAccessibleCopy(S, Entity, Initializer);
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
if (DerivedToBase)
Sequence.AddDerivedToBaseCastStep(S.Context.getQualifiedType(T1, T2Quals),
ValueKind);
else if (ObjCConversion)
Sequence.AddObjCObjectConversionStep(
S.Context.getQualifiedType(T1, T2Quals));
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
if (T1Quals != T2Quals)
Sequence.AddQualificationConversionStep(cv1T1, ValueKind);
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
Sequence.AddReferenceBindingStep(cv1T1,
/*bindingTemporary=*/InitCategory.isPRValue());
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
return;
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// - has a class type (i.e., T2 is a class type), where T1 is not
// reference-related to T2, and can be implicitly converted to an
// xvalue, class prvalue, or function lvalue of type "cv3 T3",
// where "cv1 T1" is reference-compatible with "cv3 T3",
if (T2->isRecordType()) {
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
if (RefRelationship == Sema::Ref_Incompatible) {
ConvOvlResult = TryRefInitWithConversionFunction(S, Entity,
Kind, Initializer,
/*AllowRValues=*/true,
Sequence);
if (ConvOvlResult)
Sequence.SetOverloadFailure(
InitializationSequence::FK_ReferenceInitOverloadFailed,
ConvOvlResult);
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
return;
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
Sequence.SetFailed(InitializationSequence::FK_ReferenceInitDropsQualifiers);
return;
}
2011-01-27 15:09:49 +08:00
// - Otherwise, a temporary of type "cv1 T1" is created and initialized
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// from the initializer expression using the rules for a non-reference
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// copy initialization (8.5). The reference is then bound to the
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// temporary. [...]
2010-06-04 10:29:22 +08:00
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// Determine whether we are allowed to call explicit constructors or
// explicit conversion operators.
bool AllowExplicit = (Kind.getKind() == InitializationKind::IK_Direct);
2010-06-04 10:29:22 +08:00
InitializedEntity TempEntity = InitializedEntity::InitializeTemporary(cv1T1);
ImplicitConversionSequence ICS
= S.TryImplicitConversion(Initializer, TempEntity.getType(),
2010-06-04 10:29:22 +08:00
/*SuppressUserConversions*/ false,
AllowExplicit,
/*FIXME:InOverloadResolution=*/false,
/*CStyle=*/Kind.isCStyleOrFunctionalCast(),
/*AllowObjCWritebackConversion=*/false);
if (ICS.isBad()) {
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// FIXME: Use the conversion function set stored in ICS to turn
// this into an overloading ambiguity diagnostic. However, we need
// to keep that set as an OverloadCandidateSet rather than as some
// other kind of set.
if (ConvOvlResult && !Sequence.getFailedCandidateSet().empty())
Sequence.SetOverloadFailure(
InitializationSequence::FK_ReferenceInitOverloadFailed,
ConvOvlResult);
else if (S.Context.getCanonicalType(T2) == S.Context.OverloadTy)
Sequence.SetFailed(InitializationSequence::FK_AddressOfOverloadFailed);
else
Sequence.SetFailed(InitializationSequence::FK_ReferenceInitFailed);
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
return;
} else {
Sequence.AddConversionSequenceStep(ICS, TempEntity.getType());
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
}
// [...] If T1 is reference-related to T2, cv1 must be the
// same cv-qualification as, or greater cv-qualification
// than, cv2; otherwise, the program is ill-formed.
unsigned T1CVRQuals = T1Quals.getCVRQualifiers();
unsigned T2CVRQuals = T2Quals.getCVRQualifiers();
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
if (RefRelationship == Sema::Ref_Related &&
(T1CVRQuals | T2CVRQuals) != T1CVRQuals) {
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
Sequence.SetFailed(InitializationSequence::FK_ReferenceInitDropsQualifiers);
return;
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// [...] If T1 is reference-related to T2 and the reference is an rvalue
// reference, the initializer expression shall not be an lvalue.
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
if (RefRelationship >= Sema::Ref_Related && !isLValueRef &&
InitCategory.isLValue()) {
Sequence.SetFailed(
InitializationSequence::FK_RValueReferenceBindingToLValue);
return;
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
Sequence.AddReferenceBindingStep(cv1T1, /*bindingTemporary=*/true);
return;
}
/// \brief Attempt character array initialization from a string literal
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
/// (C++ [dcl.init.string], C99 6.7.8).
static void TryStringLiteralInitialization(Sema &S,
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
const InitializedEntity &Entity,
const InitializationKind &Kind,
Expr *Initializer,
InitializationSequence &Sequence) {
Sequence.AddStringInitStep(Entity.getType());
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
}
/// \brief Attempt value initialization (C++ [dcl.init]p7).
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
static void TryValueInitialization(Sema &S,
const InitializedEntity &Entity,
const InitializationKind &Kind,
InitializationSequence &Sequence) {
// C++ [dcl.init]p5:
//
// To value-initialize an object of type T means:
QualType T = Entity.getType();
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// -- if T is an array type, then each element is value-initialized;
while (const ArrayType *AT = S.Context.getAsArrayType(T))
T = AT->getElementType();
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
if (const RecordType *RT = T->getAs<RecordType>()) {
if (CXXRecordDecl *ClassDecl = dyn_cast<CXXRecordDecl>(RT->getDecl())) {
// -- if T is a class type (clause 9) with a user-declared
// constructor (12.1), then the default constructor for T is
// called (and the initialization is ill-formed if T has no
// accessible default constructor);
//
// FIXME: we really want to refer to a single subobject of the array,
// but Entity doesn't have a way to capture that (yet).
if (ClassDecl->hasUserDeclaredConstructor())
return TryConstructorInitialization(S, Entity, Kind, 0, 0, T, Sequence);
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// -- if T is a (possibly cv-qualified) non-union class type
// without a user-provided constructor, then the object is
2011-01-27 15:09:49 +08:00
// zero-initialized and, if T's implicitly-declared default
// constructor is non-trivial, that constructor is called.
if ((ClassDecl->getTagKind() == TTK_Class ||
ClassDecl->getTagKind() == TTK_Struct)) {
Sequence.AddZeroInitializationStep(Entity.getType());
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
return TryConstructorInitialization(S, Entity, Kind, 0, 0, T, Sequence);
}
}
}
Sequence.AddZeroInitializationStep(Entity.getType());
}
/// \brief Attempt default initialization (C++ [dcl.init]p6).
static void TryDefaultInitialization(Sema &S,
const InitializedEntity &Entity,
const InitializationKind &Kind,
InitializationSequence &Sequence) {
assert(Kind.getKind() == InitializationKind::IK_Default);
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// C++ [dcl.init]p6:
// To default-initialize an object of type T means:
// - if T is an array type, each element is default-initialized;
QualType DestType = S.Context.getBaseElementType(Entity.getType());
// - if T is a (possibly cv-qualified) class type (Clause 9), the default
// constructor for T is called (and the initialization is ill-formed if
// T has no accessible default constructor);
if (DestType->isRecordType() && S.getLangOptions().CPlusPlus) {
TryConstructorInitialization(S, Entity, Kind, 0, 0, DestType, Sequence);
return;
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// - otherwise, no initialization is performed.
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// If a program calls for the default initialization of an object of
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// a const-qualified type T, T shall be a class type with a user-provided
// default constructor.
if (DestType.isConstQualified() && S.getLangOptions().CPlusPlus) {
Sequence.SetFailed(InitializationSequence::FK_DefaultInitOfConst);
return;
}
// If the destination type has a lifetime property, zero-initialize it.
if (DestType.getQualifiers().hasObjCLifetime()) {
Sequence.AddZeroInitializationStep(Entity.getType());
return;
}
}
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
/// \brief Attempt a user-defined conversion between two types (C++ [dcl.init]),
/// which enumerates all conversion functions and performs overload resolution
/// to select the best.
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
static void TryUserDefinedConversion(Sema &S,
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
const InitializedEntity &Entity,
const InitializationKind &Kind,
Expr *Initializer,
InitializationSequence &Sequence) {
QualType DestType = Entity.getType();
assert(!DestType->isReferenceType() && "References are handled elsewhere");
QualType SourceType = Initializer->getType();
assert((DestType->isRecordType() || SourceType->isRecordType()) &&
"Must have a class type to perform a user-defined conversion");
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// Build the candidate set directly in the initialization sequence
// structure, so that it will persist if we fail.
OverloadCandidateSet &CandidateSet = Sequence.getFailedCandidateSet();
CandidateSet.clear();
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// Determine whether we are allowed to call explicit constructors or
// explicit conversion operators.
bool AllowExplicit = Kind.getKind() == InitializationKind::IK_Direct;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
if (const RecordType *DestRecordType = DestType->getAs<RecordType>()) {
// The type we're converting to is a class type. Enumerate its constructors
// to see if there is a suitable conversion.
CXXRecordDecl *DestRecordDecl
= cast<CXXRecordDecl>(DestRecordType->getDecl());
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// Try to complete the type we're converting to.
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
if (!S.RequireCompleteType(Kind.getLocation(), DestType, 0)) {
DeclContext::lookup_iterator Con, ConEnd;
for (llvm::tie(Con, ConEnd) = S.LookupConstructors(DestRecordDecl);
Con != ConEnd; ++Con) {
NamedDecl *D = *Con;
DeclAccessPair FoundDecl = DeclAccessPair::make(D, D->getAccess());
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// Find the constructor (which may be a template).
CXXConstructorDecl *Constructor = 0;
FunctionTemplateDecl *ConstructorTmpl
= dyn_cast<FunctionTemplateDecl>(D);
if (ConstructorTmpl)
Constructor = cast<CXXConstructorDecl>(
ConstructorTmpl->getTemplatedDecl());
else
Constructor = cast<CXXConstructorDecl>(D);
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
if (!Constructor->isInvalidDecl() &&
Constructor->isConvertingConstructor(AllowExplicit)) {
if (ConstructorTmpl)
S.AddTemplateOverloadCandidate(ConstructorTmpl, FoundDecl,
/*ExplicitArgs*/ 0,
&Initializer, 1, CandidateSet,
/*SuppressUserConversions=*/true);
else
S.AddOverloadCandidate(Constructor, FoundDecl,
&Initializer, 1, CandidateSet,
/*SuppressUserConversions=*/true);
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
}
}
}
SourceLocation DeclLoc = Initializer->getLocStart();
if (const RecordType *SourceRecordType = SourceType->getAs<RecordType>()) {
// The type we're converting from is a class type, enumerate its conversion
// functions.
// We can only enumerate the conversion functions for a complete type; if
// the type isn't complete, simply skip this step.
if (!S.RequireCompleteType(DeclLoc, SourceType, 0)) {
CXXRecordDecl *SourceRecordDecl
= cast<CXXRecordDecl>(SourceRecordType->getDecl());
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
const UnresolvedSetImpl *Conversions
= SourceRecordDecl->getVisibleConversionFunctions();
for (UnresolvedSetImpl::const_iterator I = Conversions->begin(),
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
E = Conversions->end();
I != E; ++I) {
NamedDecl *D = *I;
CXXRecordDecl *ActingDC = cast<CXXRecordDecl>(D->getDeclContext());
if (isa<UsingShadowDecl>(D))
D = cast<UsingShadowDecl>(D)->getTargetDecl();
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
FunctionTemplateDecl *ConvTemplate = dyn_cast<FunctionTemplateDecl>(D);
CXXConversionDecl *Conv;
if (ConvTemplate)
Conv = cast<CXXConversionDecl>(ConvTemplate->getTemplatedDecl());
else
Conv = cast<CXXConversionDecl>(D);
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
if (AllowExplicit || !Conv->isExplicit()) {
if (ConvTemplate)
S.AddTemplateConversionCandidate(ConvTemplate, I.getPair(),
ActingDC, Initializer, DestType,
CandidateSet);
else
S.AddConversionCandidate(Conv, I.getPair(), ActingDC,
Initializer, DestType, CandidateSet);
}
}
}
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// Perform overload resolution. If it fails, return the failed result.
OverloadCandidateSet::iterator Best;
if (OverloadingResult Result
= CandidateSet.BestViableFunction(S, DeclLoc, Best, true)) {
Sequence.SetOverloadFailure(
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
InitializationSequence::FK_UserConversionOverloadFailed,
Result);
return;
}
FunctionDecl *Function = Best->Function;
S.MarkFunctionReferenced(DeclLoc, Function);
bool HadMultipleCandidates = (CandidateSet.size() > 1);
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
if (isa<CXXConstructorDecl>(Function)) {
// Add the user-defined conversion step. Any cv-qualification conversion is
// subsumed by the initialization.
Sequence.AddUserConversionStep(Function, Best->FoundDecl, DestType,
HadMultipleCandidates);
return;
}
// Add the user-defined conversion step that calls the conversion function.
QualType ConvType = Function->getCallResultType();
if (ConvType->getAs<RecordType>()) {
// If we're converting to a class type, there may be an copy if
// the resulting temporary object (possible to create an object of
// a base class type). That copy is not a separate conversion, so
// we just make a note of the actual destination type (possibly a
// base class of the type returned by the conversion function) and
// let the user-defined conversion step handle the conversion.
Sequence.AddUserConversionStep(Function, Best->FoundDecl, DestType,
HadMultipleCandidates);
return;
}
Sequence.AddUserConversionStep(Function, Best->FoundDecl, ConvType,
HadMultipleCandidates);
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// If the conversion following the call to the conversion function
// is interesting, add it as a separate step.
if (Best->FinalConversion.First || Best->FinalConversion.Second ||
Best->FinalConversion.Third) {
ImplicitConversionSequence ICS;
ICS.setStandard();
ICS.Standard = Best->FinalConversion;
Sequence.AddConversionSequenceStep(ICS, DestType);
}
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
}
/// The non-zero enum values here are indexes into diagnostic alternatives.
enum InvalidICRKind { IIK_okay, IIK_nonlocal, IIK_nonscalar };
/// Determines whether this expression is an acceptable ICR source.
static InvalidICRKind isInvalidICRSource(ASTContext &C, Expr *e,
bool isAddressOf) {
// Skip parens.
e = e->IgnoreParens();
// Skip address-of nodes.
if (UnaryOperator *op = dyn_cast<UnaryOperator>(e)) {
if (op->getOpcode() == UO_AddrOf)
return isInvalidICRSource(C, op->getSubExpr(), /*addressof*/ true);
// Skip certain casts.
} else if (CastExpr *ce = dyn_cast<CastExpr>(e)) {
switch (ce->getCastKind()) {
case CK_Dependent:
case CK_BitCast:
case CK_LValueBitCast:
case CK_NoOp:
return isInvalidICRSource(C, ce->getSubExpr(), isAddressOf);
case CK_ArrayToPointerDecay:
return IIK_nonscalar;
case CK_NullToPointer:
return IIK_okay;
default:
break;
}
// If we have a declaration reference, it had better be a local variable.
} else if (isa<DeclRefExpr>(e) || isa<BlockDeclRefExpr>(e)) {
if (!isAddressOf) return IIK_nonlocal;
VarDecl *var;
if (isa<DeclRefExpr>(e)) {
var = dyn_cast<VarDecl>(cast<DeclRefExpr>(e)->getDecl());
if (!var) return IIK_nonlocal;
} else {
var = cast<BlockDeclRefExpr>(e)->getDecl();
}
return (var->hasLocalStorage() ? IIK_okay : IIK_nonlocal);
// If we have a conditional operator, check both sides.
} else if (ConditionalOperator *cond = dyn_cast<ConditionalOperator>(e)) {
if (InvalidICRKind iik = isInvalidICRSource(C, cond->getLHS(), isAddressOf))
return iik;
return isInvalidICRSource(C, cond->getRHS(), isAddressOf);
// These are never scalar.
} else if (isa<ArraySubscriptExpr>(e)) {
return IIK_nonscalar;
// Otherwise, it needs to be a null pointer constant.
} else {
return (e->isNullPointerConstant(C, Expr::NPC_ValueDependentIsNull)
? IIK_okay : IIK_nonlocal);
}
return IIK_nonlocal;
}
/// Check whether the given expression is a valid operand for an
/// indirect copy/restore.
static void checkIndirectCopyRestoreSource(Sema &S, Expr *src) {
assert(src->isRValue());
InvalidICRKind iik = isInvalidICRSource(S.Context, src, false);
if (iik == IIK_okay) return;
S.Diag(src->getExprLoc(), diag::err_arc_nonlocal_writeback)
<< ((unsigned) iik - 1) // shift index into diagnostic explanations
<< src->getSourceRange();
}
/// \brief Determine whether we have compatible array types for the
/// purposes of GNU by-copy array initialization.
static bool hasCompatibleArrayTypes(ASTContext &Context,
const ArrayType *Dest,
const ArrayType *Source) {
// If the source and destination array types are equivalent, we're
// done.
if (Context.hasSameType(QualType(Dest, 0), QualType(Source, 0)))
return true;
// Make sure that the element types are the same.
if (!Context.hasSameType(Dest->getElementType(), Source->getElementType()))
return false;
// The only mismatch we allow is when the destination is an
// incomplete array type and the source is a constant array type.
return Source->isConstantArrayType() && Dest->isIncompleteArrayType();
}
static bool tryObjCWritebackConversion(Sema &S,
InitializationSequence &Sequence,
const InitializedEntity &Entity,
Expr *Initializer) {
bool ArrayDecay = false;
QualType ArgType = Initializer->getType();
QualType ArgPointee;
if (const ArrayType *ArgArrayType = S.Context.getAsArrayType(ArgType)) {
ArrayDecay = true;
ArgPointee = ArgArrayType->getElementType();
ArgType = S.Context.getPointerType(ArgPointee);
}
// Handle write-back conversion.
QualType ConvertedArgType;
if (!S.isObjCWritebackConversion(ArgType, Entity.getType(),
ConvertedArgType))
return false;
// We should copy unless we're passing to an argument explicitly
// marked 'out'.
bool ShouldCopy = true;
if (ParmVarDecl *param = cast_or_null<ParmVarDecl>(Entity.getDecl()))
ShouldCopy = (param->getObjCDeclQualifier() != ParmVarDecl::OBJC_TQ_Out);
// Do we need an lvalue conversion?
if (ArrayDecay || Initializer->isGLValue()) {
ImplicitConversionSequence ICS;
ICS.setStandard();
ICS.Standard.setAsIdentityConversion();
QualType ResultType;
if (ArrayDecay) {
ICS.Standard.First = ICK_Array_To_Pointer;
ResultType = S.Context.getPointerType(ArgPointee);
} else {
ICS.Standard.First = ICK_Lvalue_To_Rvalue;
ResultType = Initializer->getType().getNonLValueExprType(S.Context);
}
Sequence.AddConversionSequenceStep(ICS, ResultType);
}
Sequence.AddPassByIndirectCopyRestoreStep(Entity.getType(), ShouldCopy);
return true;
}
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
InitializationSequence::InitializationSequence(Sema &S,
const InitializedEntity &Entity,
const InitializationKind &Kind,
Expr **Args,
unsigned NumArgs)
: FailedCandidateSet(Kind.getLocation()) {
ASTContext &Context = S.Context;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// C++0x [dcl.init]p16:
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// The semantics of initializers are as follows. The destination type is
// the type of the object or reference being initialized and the source
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// type is the type of the initializer expression. The source type is not
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// defined when the initializer is a braced-init-list or when it is a
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// parenthesized list of expressions.
QualType DestType = Entity.getType();
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
if (DestType->isDependentType() ||
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
Expr::hasAnyTypeDependentArguments(Args, NumArgs)) {
SequenceKind = DependentSequence;
return;
}
// Almost everything is a normal sequence.
setSequenceKind(NormalSequence);
for (unsigned I = 0; I != NumArgs; ++I)
if (Args[I]->getType()->isNonOverloadPlaceholderType()) {
// FIXME: should we be doing this here?
ExprResult result = S.CheckPlaceholderExpr(Args[I]);
if (result.isInvalid()) {
SetFailed(FK_PlaceholderType);
return;
}
Args[I] = result.take();
}
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
QualType SourceType;
Expr *Initializer = 0;
if (NumArgs == 1) {
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
Initializer = Args[0];
if (!isa<InitListExpr>(Initializer))
SourceType = Initializer->getType();
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// - If the initializer is a braced-init-list, the object is
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// list-initialized (8.5.4).
if (InitListExpr *InitList = dyn_cast_or_null<InitListExpr>(Initializer)) {
TryListInitialization(S, Entity, Kind, InitList, *this);
return;
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// - If the destination type is a reference type, see 8.5.3.
if (DestType->isReferenceType()) {
// C++0x [dcl.init.ref]p1:
// A variable declared to be a T& or T&&, that is, "reference to type T"
// (8.3.2), shall be initialized by an object, or function, of type T or
// by an object that can be converted into a T.
// (Therefore, multiple arguments are not permitted.)
if (NumArgs != 1)
SetFailed(FK_TooManyInitsForReference);
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
else
TryReferenceInitialization(S, Entity, Kind, Args[0], *this);
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
return;
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// - If the initializer is (), the object is value-initialized.
if (Kind.getKind() == InitializationKind::IK_Value ||
(Kind.getKind() == InitializationKind::IK_Direct && NumArgs == 0)) {
TryValueInitialization(S, Entity, Kind, *this);
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
return;
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// Handle default initialization.
if (Kind.getKind() == InitializationKind::IK_Default) {
TryDefaultInitialization(S, Entity, Kind, *this);
return;
}
// - If the destination type is an array of characters, an array of
// char16_t, an array of char32_t, or an array of wchar_t, and the
// initializer is a string literal, see 8.5.2.
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// - Otherwise, if the destination type is an array, the program is
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// ill-formed.
if (const ArrayType *DestAT = Context.getAsArrayType(DestType)) {
if (Initializer && isa<VariableArrayType>(DestAT)) {
SetFailed(FK_VariableLengthArrayHasInitializer);
return;
}
if (Initializer && IsStringInit(Initializer, DestAT, Context)) {
TryStringLiteralInitialization(S, Entity, Kind, Initializer, *this);
return;
}
// Note: as an GNU C extension, we allow initialization of an
// array from a compound literal that creates an array of the same
// type, so long as the initializer has no side effects.
if (!S.getLangOptions().CPlusPlus && Initializer &&
isa<CompoundLiteralExpr>(Initializer->IgnoreParens()) &&
Initializer->getType()->isArrayType()) {
const ArrayType *SourceAT
= Context.getAsArrayType(Initializer->getType());
if (!hasCompatibleArrayTypes(S.Context, DestAT, SourceAT))
SetFailed(FK_ArrayTypeMismatch);
else if (Initializer->HasSideEffects(S.Context))
SetFailed(FK_NonConstantArrayInit);
else {
AddArrayInitStep(DestType);
}
} else if (DestAT->getElementType()->isAnyCharacterType())
SetFailed(FK_ArrayNeedsInitListOrStringLiteral);
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
else
SetFailed(FK_ArrayNeedsInitList);
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
return;
}
// Determine whether we should consider writeback conversions for
// Objective-C ARC.
bool allowObjCWritebackConversion = S.getLangOptions().ObjCAutoRefCount &&
Entity.getKind() == InitializedEntity::EK_Parameter;
// We're at the end of the line for C: it's either a write-back conversion
// or it's a C assignment. There's no need to check anything else.
if (!S.getLangOptions().CPlusPlus) {
// If allowed, check whether this is an Objective-C writeback conversion.
if (allowObjCWritebackConversion &&
tryObjCWritebackConversion(S, *this, Entity, Initializer)) {
return;
}
// Handle initialization in C
AddCAssignmentStep(DestType);
MaybeProduceObjCObject(S, *this, Entity);
return;
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
assert(S.getLangOptions().CPlusPlus);
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// - If the destination type is a (possibly cv-qualified) class type:
if (DestType->isRecordType()) {
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// - If the initialization is direct-initialization, or if it is
// copy-initialization where the cv-unqualified version of the
// source type is the same class as, or a derived class of, the
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// class of the destination, constructors are considered. [...]
if (Kind.getKind() == InitializationKind::IK_Direct ||
(Kind.getKind() == InitializationKind::IK_Copy &&
(Context.hasSameUnqualifiedType(SourceType, DestType) ||
S.IsDerivedFrom(SourceType, DestType))))
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
TryConstructorInitialization(S, Entity, Kind, Args, NumArgs,
Entity.getType(), *this);
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// - Otherwise (i.e., for the remaining copy-initialization cases),
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// user-defined conversion sequences that can convert from the source
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// type to the destination type or (when a conversion function is
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// used) to a derived class thereof are enumerated as described in
// 13.3.1.4, and the best one is chosen through overload resolution
// (13.3).
else
TryUserDefinedConversion(S, Entity, Kind, Initializer, *this);
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
return;
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
if (NumArgs > 1) {
SetFailed(FK_TooManyInitsForScalar);
return;
}
assert(NumArgs == 1 && "Zero-argument case handled above");
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// - Otherwise, if the source type is a (possibly cv-qualified) class
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// type, conversion functions are considered.
if (!SourceType.isNull() && SourceType->isRecordType()) {
TryUserDefinedConversion(S, Entity, Kind, Initializer, *this);
MaybeProduceObjCObject(S, *this, Entity);
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
return;
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// - Otherwise, the initial value of the object being initialized is the
// (possibly converted) value of the initializer expression. Standard
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// conversions (Clause 4) will be used, if necessary, to convert the
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// initializer expression to the cv-unqualified version of the
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// destination type; no user-defined conversions are considered.
ImplicitConversionSequence ICS
= S.TryImplicitConversion(Initializer, Entity.getType(),
/*SuppressUserConversions*/true,
2010-06-04 10:29:22 +08:00
/*AllowExplicitConversions*/ false,
/*InOverloadResolution*/ false,
/*CStyle=*/Kind.isCStyleOrFunctionalCast(),
allowObjCWritebackConversion);
if (ICS.isStandard() &&
ICS.Standard.Second == ICK_Writeback_Conversion) {
// Objective-C ARC writeback conversion.
// We should copy unless we're passing to an argument explicitly
// marked 'out'.
bool ShouldCopy = true;
if (ParmVarDecl *Param = cast_or_null<ParmVarDecl>(Entity.getDecl()))
ShouldCopy = (Param->getObjCDeclQualifier() != ParmVarDecl::OBJC_TQ_Out);
// If there was an lvalue adjustment, add it as a separate conversion.
if (ICS.Standard.First == ICK_Array_To_Pointer ||
ICS.Standard.First == ICK_Lvalue_To_Rvalue) {
ImplicitConversionSequence LvalueICS;
LvalueICS.setStandard();
LvalueICS.Standard.setAsIdentityConversion();
LvalueICS.Standard.setAllToTypes(ICS.Standard.getToType(0));
LvalueICS.Standard.First = ICS.Standard.First;
AddConversionSequenceStep(LvalueICS, ICS.Standard.getToType(0));
}
AddPassByIndirectCopyRestoreStep(Entity.getType(), ShouldCopy);
} else if (ICS.isBad()) {
DeclAccessPair dap;
if (Initializer->getType() == Context.OverloadTy &&
!S.ResolveAddressOfOverloadedFunction(Initializer
, DestType, false, dap))
SetFailed(InitializationSequence::FK_AddressOfOverloadFailed);
else
SetFailed(InitializationSequence::FK_ConversionFailed);
} else {
AddConversionSequenceStep(ICS, Entity.getType());
MaybeProduceObjCObject(S, *this, Entity);
}
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
}
InitializationSequence::~InitializationSequence() {
for (SmallVectorImpl<Step>::iterator Step = Steps.begin(),
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
StepEnd = Steps.end();
Step != StepEnd; ++Step)
Step->Destroy();
}
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// Perform initialization
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
static Sema::AssignmentAction
getAssignmentAction(const InitializedEntity &Entity) {
switch(Entity.getKind()) {
case InitializedEntity::EK_Variable:
case InitializedEntity::EK_New:
case InitializedEntity::EK_Exception:
case InitializedEntity::EK_Base:
case InitializedEntity::EK_Delegating:
return Sema::AA_Initializing;
case InitializedEntity::EK_Parameter:
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
if (Entity.getDecl() &&
isa<ObjCMethodDecl>(Entity.getDecl()->getDeclContext()))
return Sema::AA_Sending;
return Sema::AA_Passing;
case InitializedEntity::EK_Result:
return Sema::AA_Returning;
case InitializedEntity::EK_Temporary:
// FIXME: Can we tell apart casting vs. converting?
return Sema::AA_Casting;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case InitializedEntity::EK_Member:
case InitializedEntity::EK_ArrayElement:
case InitializedEntity::EK_VectorElement:
case InitializedEntity::EK_ComplexElement:
case InitializedEntity::EK_BlockElement:
return Sema::AA_Initializing;
}
llvm_unreachable("Invalid EntityKind!");
}
/// \brief Whether we should binding a created object as a temporary when
/// initializing the given entity.
static bool shouldBindAsTemporary(const InitializedEntity &Entity) {
switch (Entity.getKind()) {
case InitializedEntity::EK_ArrayElement:
case InitializedEntity::EK_Member:
case InitializedEntity::EK_Result:
case InitializedEntity::EK_New:
case InitializedEntity::EK_Variable:
case InitializedEntity::EK_Base:
case InitializedEntity::EK_Delegating:
case InitializedEntity::EK_VectorElement:
case InitializedEntity::EK_ComplexElement:
case InitializedEntity::EK_Exception:
case InitializedEntity::EK_BlockElement:
return false;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case InitializedEntity::EK_Parameter:
case InitializedEntity::EK_Temporary:
return true;
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
llvm_unreachable("missed an InitializedEntity kind?");
}
/// \brief Whether the given entity, when initialized with an object
/// created for that initialization, requires destruction.
static bool shouldDestroyTemporary(const InitializedEntity &Entity) {
switch (Entity.getKind()) {
case InitializedEntity::EK_Member:
case InitializedEntity::EK_Result:
case InitializedEntity::EK_New:
case InitializedEntity::EK_Base:
case InitializedEntity::EK_Delegating:
case InitializedEntity::EK_VectorElement:
case InitializedEntity::EK_ComplexElement:
case InitializedEntity::EK_BlockElement:
return false;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case InitializedEntity::EK_Variable:
case InitializedEntity::EK_Parameter:
case InitializedEntity::EK_Temporary:
case InitializedEntity::EK_ArrayElement:
case InitializedEntity::EK_Exception:
return true;
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
llvm_unreachable("missed an InitializedEntity kind?");
}
/// \brief Look for copy and move constructors and constructor templates, for
/// copying an object via direct-initialization (per C++11 [dcl.init]p16).
static void LookupCopyAndMoveConstructors(Sema &S,
OverloadCandidateSet &CandidateSet,
CXXRecordDecl *Class,
Expr *CurInitExpr) {
DeclContext::lookup_iterator Con, ConEnd;
for (llvm::tie(Con, ConEnd) = S.LookupConstructors(Class);
Con != ConEnd; ++Con) {
CXXConstructorDecl *Constructor = 0;
if ((Constructor = dyn_cast<CXXConstructorDecl>(*Con))) {
// Handle copy/moveconstructors, only.
if (!Constructor || Constructor->isInvalidDecl() ||
!Constructor->isCopyOrMoveConstructor() ||
!Constructor->isConvertingConstructor(/*AllowExplicit=*/true))
continue;
DeclAccessPair FoundDecl
= DeclAccessPair::make(Constructor, Constructor->getAccess());
S.AddOverloadCandidate(Constructor, FoundDecl,
&CurInitExpr, 1, CandidateSet);
continue;
}
// Handle constructor templates.
FunctionTemplateDecl *ConstructorTmpl = cast<FunctionTemplateDecl>(*Con);
if (ConstructorTmpl->isInvalidDecl())
continue;
Constructor = cast<CXXConstructorDecl>(
ConstructorTmpl->getTemplatedDecl());
if (!Constructor->isConvertingConstructor(/*AllowExplicit=*/true))
continue;
// FIXME: Do we need to limit this to copy-constructor-like
// candidates?
DeclAccessPair FoundDecl
= DeclAccessPair::make(ConstructorTmpl, ConstructorTmpl->getAccess());
S.AddTemplateOverloadCandidate(ConstructorTmpl, FoundDecl, 0,
&CurInitExpr, 1, CandidateSet, true);
}
}
/// \brief Get the location at which initialization diagnostics should appear.
static SourceLocation getInitializationLoc(const InitializedEntity &Entity,
Expr *Initializer) {
switch (Entity.getKind()) {
case InitializedEntity::EK_Result:
return Entity.getReturnLoc();
case InitializedEntity::EK_Exception:
return Entity.getThrowLoc();
case InitializedEntity::EK_Variable:
return Entity.getDecl()->getLocation();
case InitializedEntity::EK_ArrayElement:
case InitializedEntity::EK_Member:
case InitializedEntity::EK_Parameter:
case InitializedEntity::EK_Temporary:
case InitializedEntity::EK_New:
case InitializedEntity::EK_Base:
case InitializedEntity::EK_Delegating:
case InitializedEntity::EK_VectorElement:
case InitializedEntity::EK_ComplexElement:
case InitializedEntity::EK_BlockElement:
return Initializer->getLocStart();
}
llvm_unreachable("missed an InitializedEntity kind?");
}
/// \brief Make a (potentially elidable) temporary copy of the object
/// provided by the given initializer by calling the appropriate copy
/// constructor.
///
/// \param S The Sema object used for type-checking.
///
/// \param T The type of the temporary object, which must either be
/// the type of the initializer expression or a superclass thereof.
///
/// \param Enter The entity being initialized.
///
/// \param CurInit The initializer expression.
///
/// \param IsExtraneousCopy Whether this is an "extraneous" copy that
/// is permitted in C++03 (but not C++0x) when binding a reference to
/// an rvalue.
///
/// \returns An expression that copies the initializer expression into
/// a temporary object, or an error expression if a copy could not be
/// created.
static ExprResult CopyObject(Sema &S,
QualType T,
const InitializedEntity &Entity,
ExprResult CurInit,
bool IsExtraneousCopy) {
// Determine which class type we're copying to.
Expr *CurInitExpr = (Expr *)CurInit.get();
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
CXXRecordDecl *Class = 0;
if (const RecordType *Record = T->getAs<RecordType>())
Class = cast<CXXRecordDecl>(Record->getDecl());
if (!Class)
return move(CurInit);
// C++0x [class.copy]p32:
// When certain criteria are met, an implementation is allowed to
// omit the copy/move construction of a class object, even if the
// copy/move constructor and/or destructor for the object have
// side effects. [...]
// - when a temporary class object that has not been bound to a
// reference (12.2) would be copied/moved to a class object
// with the same cv-unqualified type, the copy/move operation
// can be omitted by constructing the temporary object
// directly into the target of the omitted copy/move
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
//
// Note that the other three bullets are handled elsewhere. Copy
// elision for return statements and throw expressions are handled as part
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// of constructor initialization, while copy elision for exception handlers
// is handled by the run-time.
bool Elidable = CurInitExpr->isTemporaryObject(S.Context, Class);
SourceLocation Loc = getInitializationLoc(Entity, CurInit.get());
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// Make sure that the type we are copying is complete.
if (S.RequireCompleteType(Loc, T, S.PDiag(diag::err_temp_copy_incomplete)))
return move(CurInit);
// Perform overload resolution using the class's copy/move constructors.
// Only consider constructors and constructor templates. Per
// C++0x [dcl.init]p16, second bullet to class types, this initialization
// is direct-initialization.
OverloadCandidateSet CandidateSet(Loc);
LookupCopyAndMoveConstructors(S, CandidateSet, Class, CurInitExpr);
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
bool HadMultipleCandidates = (CandidateSet.size() > 1);
OverloadCandidateSet::iterator Best;
switch (CandidateSet.BestViableFunction(S, Loc, Best)) {
case OR_Success:
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case OR_No_Viable_Function:
S.Diag(Loc, IsExtraneousCopy && !S.isSFINAEContext()
? diag::ext_rvalue_to_reference_temp_copy_no_viable
: diag::err_temp_copy_no_viable)
<< (int)Entity.getKind() << CurInitExpr->getType()
<< CurInitExpr->getSourceRange();
CandidateSet.NoteCandidates(S, OCD_AllCandidates, &CurInitExpr, 1);
if (!IsExtraneousCopy || S.isSFINAEContext())
return ExprError();
return move(CurInit);
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case OR_Ambiguous:
S.Diag(Loc, diag::err_temp_copy_ambiguous)
<< (int)Entity.getKind() << CurInitExpr->getType()
<< CurInitExpr->getSourceRange();
CandidateSet.NoteCandidates(S, OCD_ViableCandidates, &CurInitExpr, 1);
return ExprError();
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case OR_Deleted:
S.Diag(Loc, diag::err_temp_copy_deleted)
<< (int)Entity.getKind() << CurInitExpr->getType()
<< CurInitExpr->getSourceRange();
S.Diag(Best->Function->getLocation(), diag::note_unavailable_here)
<< 1 << Best->Function->isDeleted();
return ExprError();
}
CXXConstructorDecl *Constructor = cast<CXXConstructorDecl>(Best->Function);
ASTOwningVector<Expr*> ConstructorArgs(S);
CurInit.release(); // Ownership transferred into MultiExprArg, below.
S.CheckConstructorAccess(Loc, Constructor, Entity,
Best->FoundDecl.getAccess(), IsExtraneousCopy);
if (IsExtraneousCopy) {
// If this is a totally extraneous copy for C++03 reference
// binding purposes, just return the original initialization
// expression. We don't generate an (elided) copy operation here
// because doing so would require us to pass down a flag to avoid
// infinite recursion, where each step adds another extraneous,
// elidable copy.
// Instantiate the default arguments of any extra parameters in
// the selected copy constructor, as if we were going to create a
// proper call to the copy constructor.
for (unsigned I = 1, N = Constructor->getNumParams(); I != N; ++I) {
ParmVarDecl *Parm = Constructor->getParamDecl(I);
if (S.RequireCompleteType(Loc, Parm->getType(),
S.PDiag(diag::err_call_incomplete_argument)))
break;
// Build the default argument expression; we don't actually care
// if this succeeds or not, because this routine will complain
// if there was a problem.
S.BuildCXXDefaultArgExpr(Loc, Constructor, Parm);
}
return S.Owned(CurInitExpr);
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
S.MarkFunctionReferenced(Loc, Constructor);
// Determine the arguments required to actually perform the
// constructor call (we might have derived-to-base conversions, or
// the copy constructor may have default arguments).
if (S.CompleteConstructorCall(Constructor, MultiExprArg(&CurInitExpr, 1),
Loc, ConstructorArgs))
return ExprError();
// Actually perform the constructor call.
CurInit = S.BuildCXXConstructExpr(Loc, T, Constructor, Elidable,
move_arg(ConstructorArgs),
HadMultipleCandidates,
/*ZeroInit*/ false,
CXXConstructExpr::CK_Complete,
SourceRange());
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// If we're supposed to bind temporaries, do so.
if (!CurInit.isInvalid() && shouldBindAsTemporary(Entity))
CurInit = S.MaybeBindToTemporary(CurInit.takeAs<Expr>());
return move(CurInit);
}
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
/// \brief Check whether elidable copy construction for binding a reference to
/// a temporary would have succeeded if we were building in C++98 mode, for
/// -Wc++98-compat.
static void CheckCXX98CompatAccessibleCopy(Sema &S,
const InitializedEntity &Entity,
Expr *CurInitExpr) {
assert(S.getLangOptions().CPlusPlus0x);
const RecordType *Record = CurInitExpr->getType()->getAs<RecordType>();
if (!Record)
return;
SourceLocation Loc = getInitializationLoc(Entity, CurInitExpr);
if (S.Diags.getDiagnosticLevel(diag::warn_cxx98_compat_temp_copy, Loc)
== DiagnosticsEngine::Ignored)
return;
// Find constructors which would have been considered.
OverloadCandidateSet CandidateSet(Loc);
LookupCopyAndMoveConstructors(
S, CandidateSet, cast<CXXRecordDecl>(Record->getDecl()), CurInitExpr);
// Perform overload resolution.
OverloadCandidateSet::iterator Best;
OverloadingResult OR = CandidateSet.BestViableFunction(S, Loc, Best);
PartialDiagnostic Diag = S.PDiag(diag::warn_cxx98_compat_temp_copy)
<< OR << (int)Entity.getKind() << CurInitExpr->getType()
<< CurInitExpr->getSourceRange();
switch (OR) {
case OR_Success:
S.CheckConstructorAccess(Loc, cast<CXXConstructorDecl>(Best->Function),
Best->FoundDecl.getAccess(), Diag);
// FIXME: Check default arguments as far as that's possible.
break;
case OR_No_Viable_Function:
S.Diag(Loc, Diag);
CandidateSet.NoteCandidates(S, OCD_AllCandidates, &CurInitExpr, 1);
break;
case OR_Ambiguous:
S.Diag(Loc, Diag);
CandidateSet.NoteCandidates(S, OCD_ViableCandidates, &CurInitExpr, 1);
break;
case OR_Deleted:
S.Diag(Loc, Diag);
S.Diag(Best->Function->getLocation(), diag::note_unavailable_here)
<< 1 << Best->Function->isDeleted();
break;
}
}
void InitializationSequence::PrintInitLocationNote(Sema &S,
const InitializedEntity &Entity) {
if (Entity.getKind() == InitializedEntity::EK_Parameter && Entity.getDecl()) {
if (Entity.getDecl()->getLocation().isInvalid())
return;
if (Entity.getDecl()->getDeclName())
S.Diag(Entity.getDecl()->getLocation(), diag::note_parameter_named_here)
<< Entity.getDecl()->getDeclName();
else
S.Diag(Entity.getDecl()->getLocation(), diag::note_parameter_here);
}
}
static bool isReferenceBinding(const InitializationSequence::Step &s) {
return s.Kind == InitializationSequence::SK_BindReference ||
s.Kind == InitializationSequence::SK_BindReferenceToTemporary;
}
static ExprResult
PerformConstructorInitialization(Sema &S,
const InitializedEntity &Entity,
const InitializationKind &Kind,
MultiExprArg Args,
const InitializationSequence::Step& Step,
bool &ConstructorInitRequiresZeroInit) {
unsigned NumArgs = Args.size();
CXXConstructorDecl *Constructor
= cast<CXXConstructorDecl>(Step.Function.Function);
bool HadMultipleCandidates = Step.Function.HadMultipleCandidates;
// Build a call to the selected constructor.
ASTOwningVector<Expr*> ConstructorArgs(S);
SourceLocation Loc = (Kind.isCopyInit() && Kind.getEqualLoc().isValid())
? Kind.getEqualLoc()
: Kind.getLocation();
if (Kind.getKind() == InitializationKind::IK_Default) {
// Force even a trivial, implicit default constructor to be
// semantically checked. We do this explicitly because we don't build
// the definition for completely trivial constructors.
CXXRecordDecl *ClassDecl = Constructor->getParent();
assert(ClassDecl && "No parent class for constructor.");
if (Constructor->isDefaulted() && Constructor->isDefaultConstructor() &&
ClassDecl->hasTrivialDefaultConstructor() &&
!Constructor->isUsed(false))
S.DefineImplicitDefaultConstructor(Loc, Constructor);
}
ExprResult CurInit = S.Owned((Expr *)0);
// Determine the arguments required to actually perform the constructor
// call.
if (S.CompleteConstructorCall(Constructor, move(Args),
Loc, ConstructorArgs))
return ExprError();
if (Entity.getKind() == InitializedEntity::EK_Temporary &&
NumArgs != 1 && // FIXME: Hack to work around cast weirdness
(Kind.getKind() == InitializationKind::IK_Direct ||
Kind.getKind() == InitializationKind::IK_Value)) {
// An explicitly-constructed temporary, e.g., X(1, 2).
unsigned NumExprs = ConstructorArgs.size();
Expr **Exprs = (Expr **)ConstructorArgs.take();
S.MarkFunctionReferenced(Loc, Constructor);
S.DiagnoseUseOfDecl(Constructor, Loc);
TypeSourceInfo *TSInfo = Entity.getTypeSourceInfo();
if (!TSInfo)
TSInfo = S.Context.getTrivialTypeSourceInfo(Entity.getType(), Loc);
CurInit = S.Owned(new (S.Context) CXXTemporaryObjectExpr(S.Context,
Constructor,
TSInfo,
Exprs,
NumExprs,
Kind.getParenRange(),
HadMultipleCandidates,
ConstructorInitRequiresZeroInit));
} else {
CXXConstructExpr::ConstructionKind ConstructKind =
CXXConstructExpr::CK_Complete;
if (Entity.getKind() == InitializedEntity::EK_Base) {
ConstructKind = Entity.getBaseSpecifier()->isVirtual() ?
CXXConstructExpr::CK_VirtualBase :
CXXConstructExpr::CK_NonVirtualBase;
} else if (Entity.getKind() == InitializedEntity::EK_Delegating) {
ConstructKind = CXXConstructExpr::CK_Delegating;
}
// Only get the parenthesis range if it is a direct construction.
SourceRange parenRange =
Kind.getKind() == InitializationKind::IK_Direct ?
Kind.getParenRange() : SourceRange();
// If the entity allows NRVO, mark the construction as elidable
// unconditionally.
if (Entity.allowsNRVO())
CurInit = S.BuildCXXConstructExpr(Loc, Entity.getType(),
Constructor, /*Elidable=*/true,
move_arg(ConstructorArgs),
HadMultipleCandidates,
ConstructorInitRequiresZeroInit,
ConstructKind,
parenRange);
else
CurInit = S.BuildCXXConstructExpr(Loc, Entity.getType(),
Constructor,
move_arg(ConstructorArgs),
HadMultipleCandidates,
ConstructorInitRequiresZeroInit,
ConstructKind,
parenRange);
}
if (CurInit.isInvalid())
return ExprError();
// Only check access if all of that succeeded.
S.CheckConstructorAccess(Loc, Constructor, Entity,
Step.Function.FoundDecl.getAccess());
S.DiagnoseUseOfDecl(Step.Function.FoundDecl, Loc);
if (shouldBindAsTemporary(Entity))
CurInit = S.MaybeBindToTemporary(CurInit.takeAs<Expr>());
return move(CurInit);
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
ExprResult
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
InitializationSequence::Perform(Sema &S,
const InitializedEntity &Entity,
const InitializationKind &Kind,
MultiExprArg Args,
QualType *ResultType) {
if (Failed()) {
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
unsigned NumArgs = Args.size();
Diagnose(S, Entity, Kind, (Expr **)Args.release(), NumArgs);
return ExprError();
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
if (getKind() == DependentSequence) {
// If the declaration is a non-dependent, incomplete array type
// that has an initializer, then its type will be completed once
// the initializer is instantiated.
if (ResultType && !Entity.getType()->isDependentType() &&
Args.size() == 1) {
QualType DeclType = Entity.getType();
if (const IncompleteArrayType *ArrayT
= S.Context.getAsIncompleteArrayType(DeclType)) {
// FIXME: We don't currently have the ability to accurately
// compute the length of an initializer list without
// performing full type-checking of the initializer list
// (since we have to determine where braces are implicitly
// introduced and such). So, we fall back to making the array
// type a dependently-sized array type with no specified
// bound.
if (isa<InitListExpr>((Expr *)Args.get()[0])) {
SourceRange Brackets;
// Scavange the location of the brackets from the entity, if we can.
if (DeclaratorDecl *DD = Entity.getDecl()) {
if (TypeSourceInfo *TInfo = DD->getTypeSourceInfo()) {
TypeLoc TL = TInfo->getTypeLoc();
if (IncompleteArrayTypeLoc *ArrayLoc
= dyn_cast<IncompleteArrayTypeLoc>(&TL))
Brackets = ArrayLoc->getBracketsRange();
}
}
*ResultType
= S.Context.getDependentSizedArrayType(ArrayT->getElementType(),
/*NumElts=*/0,
ArrayT->getSizeModifier(),
ArrayT->getIndexTypeCVRQualifiers(),
Brackets);
}
}
}
assert(Kind.getKind() == InitializationKind::IK_Copy ||
Kind.isExplicitCast());
return ExprResult(Args.release()[0]);
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
}
// No steps means no initialization.
if (Steps.empty())
return S.Owned((Expr *)0);
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
QualType DestType = Entity.getType().getNonReferenceType();
// FIXME: Ugly hack around the fact that Entity.getType() is not
// the same as Entity.getDecl()->getType() in cases involving type merging,
// and we want latter when it makes sense.
if (ResultType)
*ResultType = Entity.getDecl() ? Entity.getDecl()->getType() :
Entity.getType();
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
ExprResult CurInit = S.Owned((Expr *)0);
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// For initialization steps that start with a single initializer,
// grab the only argument out the Args and place it into the "current"
// initializer.
switch (Steps.front().Kind) {
case SK_ResolveAddressOfOverloadedFunction:
case SK_CastDerivedToBaseRValue:
case SK_CastDerivedToBaseXValue:
case SK_CastDerivedToBaseLValue:
case SK_BindReference:
case SK_BindReferenceToTemporary:
case SK_ExtraneousCopyToTemporary:
case SK_UserConversion:
case SK_QualificationConversionLValue:
case SK_QualificationConversionXValue:
case SK_QualificationConversionRValue:
case SK_ConversionSequence:
case SK_ListConstructorCall:
case SK_ListInitialization:
case SK_UnwrapInitList:
case SK_RewrapInitList:
case SK_CAssignment:
case SK_StringInit:
case SK_ObjCObjectConversion:
case SK_ArrayInit:
case SK_PassByIndirectCopyRestore:
case SK_PassByIndirectRestore:
case SK_ProduceObjCObject:
case SK_StdInitializerList: {
assert(Args.size() == 1);
CurInit = Args.get()[0];
if (!CurInit.get()) return ExprError();
break;
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case SK_ConstructorInitialization:
case SK_ZeroInitialization:
break;
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// Walk through the computed steps for the initialization sequence,
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// performing the specified conversions along the way.
bool ConstructorInitRequiresZeroInit = false;
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
for (step_iterator Step = step_begin(), StepEnd = step_end();
Step != StepEnd; ++Step) {
if (CurInit.isInvalid())
return ExprError();
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
QualType SourceType = CurInit.get() ? CurInit.get()->getType() : QualType();
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
switch (Step->Kind) {
case SK_ResolveAddressOfOverloadedFunction:
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// Overload resolution determined which function invoke; update the
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// initializer to reflect that choice.
S.CheckAddressOfMemberAccess(CurInit.get(), Step->Function.FoundDecl);
S.DiagnoseUseOfDecl(Step->Function.FoundDecl, Kind.getLocation());
CurInit = S.FixOverloadedFunctionReference(move(CurInit),
Step->Function.FoundDecl,
Step->Function.Function);
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
case SK_CastDerivedToBaseRValue:
case SK_CastDerivedToBaseXValue:
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
case SK_CastDerivedToBaseLValue: {
// We have a derived-to-base cast that produces either an rvalue or an
// lvalue. Perform that cast.
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
CXXCastPath BasePath;
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// Casts to inaccessible base classes are allowed with C-style casts.
bool IgnoreBaseAccess = Kind.isCStyleOrFunctionalCast();
if (S.CheckDerivedToBaseConversion(SourceType, Step->Type,
CurInit.get()->getLocStart(),
CurInit.get()->getSourceRange(),
&BasePath, IgnoreBaseAccess))
return ExprError();
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
if (S.BasePathInvolvesVirtualBase(BasePath)) {
QualType T = SourceType;
if (const PointerType *Pointer = T->getAs<PointerType>())
T = Pointer->getPointeeType();
if (const RecordType *RecordTy = T->getAs<RecordType>())
S.MarkVTableUsed(CurInit.get()->getLocStart(),
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
cast<CXXRecordDecl>(RecordTy->getDecl()));
}
ExprValueKind VK =
Step->Kind == SK_CastDerivedToBaseLValue ?
VK_LValue :
(Step->Kind == SK_CastDerivedToBaseXValue ?
VK_XValue :
VK_RValue);
CurInit = S.Owned(ImplicitCastExpr::Create(S.Context,
Step->Type,
CK_DerivedToBase,
CurInit.get(),
&BasePath, VK));
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
break;
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
case SK_BindReference:
if (FieldDecl *BitField = CurInit.get()->getBitField()) {
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// References cannot bind to bit fields (C++ [dcl.init.ref]p5).
S.Diag(Kind.getLocation(), diag::err_reference_bind_to_bitfield)
<< Entity.getType().isVolatileQualified()
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
<< BitField->getDeclName()
<< CurInit.get()->getSourceRange();
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
S.Diag(BitField->getLocation(), diag::note_bitfield_decl);
return ExprError();
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
}
if (CurInit.get()->refersToVectorElement()) {
2010-02-03 03:02:38 +08:00
// References cannot bind to vector elements.
S.Diag(Kind.getLocation(), diag::err_reference_bind_to_vector_element)
<< Entity.getType().isVolatileQualified()
<< CurInit.get()->getSourceRange();
PrintInitLocationNote(S, Entity);
return ExprError();
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// Reference binding does not have any corresponding ASTs.
// Check exception specifications
if (S.CheckExceptionSpecCompatibility(CurInit.get(), DestType))
return ExprError();
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
break;
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
case SK_BindReferenceToTemporary:
// Check exception specifications
if (S.CheckExceptionSpecCompatibility(CurInit.get(), DestType))
return ExprError();
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// Materialize the temporary into memory.
CurInit = new (S.Context) MaterializeTemporaryExpr(
Entity.getType().getNonReferenceType(),
CurInit.get(),
Entity.getType()->isLValueReferenceType());
// If we're binding to an Objective-C object that has lifetime, we
// need cleanups.
if (S.getLangOptions().ObjCAutoRefCount &&
CurInit.get()->getType()->isObjCLifetimeType())
S.ExprNeedsCleanups = true;
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case SK_ExtraneousCopyToTemporary:
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
CurInit = CopyObject(S, Step->Type, Entity, move(CurInit),
/*IsExtraneousCopy=*/true);
break;
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
case SK_UserConversion: {
// We have a user-defined conversion that invokes either a constructor
// or a conversion function.
CastKind CastKind;
bool IsCopy = false;
FunctionDecl *Fn = Step->Function.Function;
DeclAccessPair FoundFn = Step->Function.FoundDecl;
bool HadMultipleCandidates = Step->Function.HadMultipleCandidates;
bool CreatedObject = false;
if (CXXConstructorDecl *Constructor = dyn_cast<CXXConstructorDecl>(Fn)) {
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// Build a call to the selected constructor.
ASTOwningVector<Expr*> ConstructorArgs(S);
SourceLocation Loc = CurInit.get()->getLocStart();
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
CurInit.release(); // Ownership transferred into MultiExprArg, below.
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// Determine the arguments required to actually perform the constructor
// call.
Expr *Arg = CurInit.get();
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
if (S.CompleteConstructorCall(Constructor,
MultiExprArg(&Arg, 1),
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
Loc, ConstructorArgs))
return ExprError();
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// Build the an expression that constructs a temporary.
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
CurInit = S.BuildCXXConstructExpr(Loc, Step->Type, Constructor,
move_arg(ConstructorArgs),
HadMultipleCandidates,
/*ZeroInit*/ false,
CXXConstructExpr::CK_Complete,
SourceRange());
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
if (CurInit.isInvalid())
return ExprError();
S.CheckConstructorAccess(Kind.getLocation(), Constructor, Entity,
FoundFn.getAccess());
S.DiagnoseUseOfDecl(FoundFn, Kind.getLocation());
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
CastKind = CK_ConstructorConversion;
QualType Class = S.Context.getTypeDeclType(Constructor->getParent());
if (S.Context.hasSameUnqualifiedType(SourceType, Class) ||
S.IsDerivedFrom(SourceType, Class))
IsCopy = true;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
CreatedObject = true;
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
} else {
// Build a call to the conversion function.
CXXConversionDecl *Conversion = cast<CXXConversionDecl>(Fn);
S.CheckMemberOperatorAccess(Kind.getLocation(), CurInit.get(), 0,
FoundFn);
S.DiagnoseUseOfDecl(FoundFn, Kind.getLocation());
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
// FIXME: Should we move this initialization into a separate
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// derived-to-base conversion? I believe the answer is "no", because
// we don't want to turn off access control here for c-style casts.
ExprResult CurInitExprRes =
S.PerformObjectArgumentInitialization(CurInit.take(), /*Qualifier=*/0,
FoundFn, Conversion);
if(CurInitExprRes.isInvalid())
return ExprError();
CurInit = move(CurInitExprRes);
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// Build the actual call to the conversion function.
CurInit = S.BuildCXXMemberCallExpr(CurInit.get(), FoundFn, Conversion,
HadMultipleCandidates);
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
if (CurInit.isInvalid() || !CurInit.get())
return ExprError();
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
CastKind = CK_UserDefinedConversion;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
CreatedObject = Conversion->getResultType()->isRecordType();
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
bool RequiresCopy = !IsCopy && !isReferenceBinding(Steps.back());
bool MaybeBindToTemp = RequiresCopy || shouldBindAsTemporary(Entity);
if (!MaybeBindToTemp && CreatedObject && shouldDestroyTemporary(Entity)) {
QualType T = CurInit.get()->getType();
if (const RecordType *Record = T->getAs<RecordType>()) {
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
CXXDestructorDecl *Destructor
= S.LookupDestructor(cast<CXXRecordDecl>(Record->getDecl()));
S.CheckDestructorAccess(CurInit.get()->getLocStart(), Destructor,
S.PDiag(diag::err_access_dtor_temp) << T);
S.MarkFunctionReferenced(CurInit.get()->getLocStart(), Destructor);
S.DiagnoseUseOfDecl(Destructor, CurInit.get()->getLocStart());
}
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
CurInit = S.Owned(ImplicitCastExpr::Create(S.Context,
CurInit.get()->getType(),
CastKind, CurInit.get(), 0,
CurInit.get()->getValueKind()));
if (MaybeBindToTemp)
CurInit = S.MaybeBindToTemporary(CurInit.takeAs<Expr>());
if (RequiresCopy)
CurInit = CopyObject(S, Entity.getType().getNonReferenceType(), Entity,
move(CurInit), /*IsExtraneousCopy=*/false);
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
break;
}
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
case SK_QualificationConversionLValue:
case SK_QualificationConversionXValue:
case SK_QualificationConversionRValue: {
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
// Perform a qualification conversion; these can never go wrong.
ExprValueKind VK =
Step->Kind == SK_QualificationConversionLValue ?
VK_LValue :
(Step->Kind == SK_QualificationConversionXValue ?
VK_XValue :
VK_RValue);
CurInit = S.ImpCastExprToType(CurInit.take(), Step->Type, CK_NoOp, VK);
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
break;
}
case SK_ConversionSequence: {
Sema::CheckedConversionKind CCK
= Kind.isCStyleCast()? Sema::CCK_CStyleCast
: Kind.isFunctionalCast()? Sema::CCK_FunctionalCast
: Kind.isExplicitCast()? Sema::CCK_OtherCast
: Sema::CCK_ImplicitConversion;
ExprResult CurInitExprRes =
S.PerformImplicitConversion(CurInit.get(), Step->Type, *Step->ICS,
getAssignmentAction(Entity), CCK);
if (CurInitExprRes.isInvalid())
return ExprError();
CurInit = move(CurInitExprRes);
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
break;
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case SK_ListInitialization: {
InitListExpr *InitList = cast<InitListExpr>(CurInit.get());
// Hack: We must pass *ResultType if available in order to set the type
// of arrays, e.g. in 'int ar[] = {1, 2, 3};'.
// But in 'const X &x = {1, 2, 3};' we're supposed to initialize a
// temporary, not a reference, so we should pass Ty.
// Worst case: 'const int (&arref)[] = {1, 2, 3};'.
// Since this step is never used for a reference directly, we explicitly
// unwrap references here and rewrap them afterwards.
// We also need to create a InitializeTemporary entity for this.
QualType Ty = ResultType ? ResultType->getNonReferenceType() : Step->Type;
bool IsTemporary = ResultType && (*ResultType)->isReferenceType();
InitializedEntity TempEntity = InitializedEntity::InitializeTemporary(Ty);
InitListChecker PerformInitList(S, IsTemporary ? TempEntity : Entity,
InitList, Ty, /*VerifyOnly=*/false,
Kind.getKind() != InitializationKind::IK_Direct ||
!S.getLangOptions().CPlusPlus0x);
if (PerformInitList.HadError())
return ExprError();
if (ResultType) {
if ((*ResultType)->isRValueReferenceType())
Ty = S.Context.getRValueReferenceType(Ty);
else if ((*ResultType)->isLValueReferenceType())
Ty = S.Context.getLValueReferenceType(Ty,
(*ResultType)->getAs<LValueReferenceType>()->isSpelledAsLValue());
*ResultType = Ty;
}
InitListExpr *StructuredInitList =
PerformInitList.getFullyStructuredList();
CurInit.release();
CurInit = S.Owned(StructuredInitList);
break;
}
case SK_ListConstructorCall: {
InitListExpr *InitList = cast<InitListExpr>(CurInit.get());
MultiExprArg Arg(InitList->getInits(), InitList->getNumInits());
CurInit = PerformConstructorInitialization(S, Entity, Kind,
move(Arg), *Step,
ConstructorInitRequiresZeroInit);
break;
}
case SK_UnwrapInitList:
CurInit = S.Owned(cast<InitListExpr>(CurInit.take())->getInit(0));
break;
case SK_RewrapInitList: {
Expr *E = CurInit.take();
InitListExpr *Syntactic = Step->WrappingSyntacticList;
InitListExpr *ILE = new (S.Context) InitListExpr(S.Context,
Syntactic->getLBraceLoc(), &E, 1, Syntactic->getRBraceLoc());
ILE->setSyntacticForm(Syntactic);
ILE->setType(E->getType());
ILE->setValueKind(E->getValueKind());
CurInit = S.Owned(ILE);
break;
}
case SK_ConstructorInitialization:
CurInit = PerformConstructorInitialization(S, Entity, Kind, move(Args),
*Step,
ConstructorInitRequiresZeroInit);
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case SK_ZeroInitialization: {
step_iterator NextStep = Step;
++NextStep;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
if (NextStep != StepEnd &&
NextStep->Kind == SK_ConstructorInitialization) {
// The need for zero-initialization is recorded directly into
// the call to the object's constructor within the next step.
ConstructorInitRequiresZeroInit = true;
} else if (Kind.getKind() == InitializationKind::IK_Value &&
S.getLangOptions().CPlusPlus &&
!Kind.isImplicitValueInit()) {
TypeSourceInfo *TSInfo = Entity.getTypeSourceInfo();
if (!TSInfo)
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
TSInfo = S.Context.getTrivialTypeSourceInfo(Step->Type,
Kind.getRange().getBegin());
CurInit = S.Owned(new (S.Context) CXXScalarValueInitExpr(
TSInfo->getType().getNonLValueExprType(S.Context),
TSInfo,
Kind.getRange().getEnd()));
} else {
CurInit = S.Owned(new (S.Context) ImplicitValueInitExpr(Step->Type));
}
break;
}
case SK_CAssignment: {
QualType SourceType = CurInit.get()->getType();
ExprResult Result = move(CurInit);
Sema::AssignConvertType ConvTy =
S.CheckSingleAssignmentConstraints(Step->Type, Result);
if (Result.isInvalid())
return ExprError();
CurInit = move(Result);
// If this is a call, allow conversion to a transparent union.
ExprResult CurInitExprRes = move(CurInit);
if (ConvTy != Sema::Compatible &&
Entity.getKind() == InitializedEntity::EK_Parameter &&
S.CheckTransparentUnionArgumentConstraints(Step->Type, CurInitExprRes)
== Sema::Compatible)
ConvTy = Sema::Compatible;
if (CurInitExprRes.isInvalid())
return ExprError();
CurInit = move(CurInitExprRes);
bool Complained;
if (S.DiagnoseAssignmentResult(ConvTy, Kind.getLocation(),
Step->Type, SourceType,
CurInit.get(),
getAssignmentAction(Entity),
&Complained)) {
PrintInitLocationNote(S, Entity);
return ExprError();
} else if (Complained)
PrintInitLocationNote(S, Entity);
break;
}
case SK_StringInit: {
QualType Ty = Step->Type;
CheckStringInit(CurInit.get(), ResultType ? *ResultType : Ty,
S.Context.getAsArrayType(Ty), S);
break;
}
case SK_ObjCObjectConversion:
CurInit = S.ImpCastExprToType(CurInit.take(), Step->Type,
CK_ObjCObjectLValueCast,
CurInit.get()->getValueKind());
break;
case SK_ArrayInit:
// Okay: we checked everything before creating this step. Note that
// this is a GNU extension.
S.Diag(Kind.getLocation(), diag::ext_array_init_copy)
<< Step->Type << CurInit.get()->getType()
<< CurInit.get()->getSourceRange();
// If the destination type is an incomplete array type, update the
// type accordingly.
if (ResultType) {
if (const IncompleteArrayType *IncompleteDest
= S.Context.getAsIncompleteArrayType(Step->Type)) {
if (const ConstantArrayType *ConstantSource
= S.Context.getAsConstantArrayType(CurInit.get()->getType())) {
*ResultType = S.Context.getConstantArrayType(
IncompleteDest->getElementType(),
ConstantSource->getSize(),
ArrayType::Normal, 0);
}
}
}
break;
case SK_PassByIndirectCopyRestore:
case SK_PassByIndirectRestore:
checkIndirectCopyRestoreSource(S, CurInit.get());
CurInit = S.Owned(new (S.Context)
ObjCIndirectCopyRestoreExpr(CurInit.take(), Step->Type,
Step->Kind == SK_PassByIndirectCopyRestore));
break;
case SK_ProduceObjCObject:
CurInit = S.Owned(ImplicitCastExpr::Create(S.Context, Step->Type,
CK_ARCProduceObject,
CurInit.take(), 0, VK_RValue));
break;
case SK_StdInitializerList: {
QualType Dest = Step->Type;
QualType E;
bool Success = S.isStdInitializerList(Dest, &E);
(void)Success;
assert(Success && "Destination type changed?");
InitListExpr *ILE = cast<InitListExpr>(CurInit.take());
unsigned NumInits = ILE->getNumInits();
SmallVector<Expr*, 16> Converted(NumInits);
InitializedEntity HiddenArray = InitializedEntity::InitializeTemporary(
S.Context.getConstantArrayType(E,
llvm::APInt(S.Context.getTypeSize(S.Context.getSizeType()),
NumInits),
ArrayType::Normal, 0));
InitializedEntity Element =InitializedEntity::InitializeElement(S.Context,
0, HiddenArray);
for (unsigned i = 0; i < NumInits; ++i) {
Element.setElementIndex(i);
ExprResult Init = S.Owned(ILE->getInit(i));
ExprResult Res = S.PerformCopyInitialization(Element,
Init.get()->getExprLoc(),
Init);
assert(!Res.isInvalid() && "Result changed since try phase.");
Converted[i] = Res.take();
}
InitListExpr *Semantic = new (S.Context)
InitListExpr(S.Context, ILE->getLBraceLoc(),
Converted.data(), NumInits, ILE->getRBraceLoc());
Semantic->setSyntacticForm(ILE);
Semantic->setType(Dest);
CurInit = S.Owned(Semantic);
break;
}
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
}
}
// Diagnose non-fatal problems with the completed initialization.
if (Entity.getKind() == InitializedEntity::EK_Member &&
cast<FieldDecl>(Entity.getDecl())->isBitField())
S.CheckBitFieldInitialization(Kind.getLocation(),
cast<FieldDecl>(Entity.getDecl()),
CurInit.get());
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
return move(CurInit);
}
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// Diagnose initialization failures
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
bool InitializationSequence::Diagnose(Sema &S,
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
const InitializedEntity &Entity,
const InitializationKind &Kind,
Expr **Args, unsigned NumArgs) {
if (!Failed())
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
return false;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
QualType DestType = Entity.getType();
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
switch (Failure) {
case FK_TooManyInitsForReference:
Rework base and member initialization in constructors, with several (necessarily simultaneous) changes: - CXXBaseOrMemberInitializer now contains only a single initializer rather than a set of initialiation arguments + a constructor. The single initializer covers all aspects of initialization, including constructor calls as necessary but also cleanup of temporaries created by the initializer (which we never handled before!). - Rework + simplify code generation for CXXBaseOrMemberInitializers, since we can now just emit the initializer as an initializer. - Switched base and member initialization over to the new initialization code (InitializationSequence), so that it - Improved diagnostics for the new initialization code when initializing bases and members, to match the diagnostics produced by the previous (special-purpose) code. - Simplify the representation of type-checked constructor initializers in templates; instead of keeping the fully-type-checked AST, which is rather hard to undo at template instantiation time, throw away the type-checked AST and store the raw expressions in the AST. This simplifies instantiation, but loses a little but of information in the AST. - When type-checking implicit base or member initializers within a dependent context, don't add the generated initializers into the AST, because they'll look like they were explicit. - Record in CXXConstructExpr when the constructor call is to initialize a base class, so that CodeGen does not have to infer it from context. This ensures that we call the right kind of constructor. There are also a few "opportunity" fixes here that were needed to not regress, for example: - Diagnose default-initialization of a const-qualified class that does not have a user-declared default constructor. We had this diagnostic specifically for bases and members, but missed it for variables. That's fixed now. - When defining the implicit constructors, destructor, and copy-assignment operator, set the CurContext to that constructor when we're defining the body. llvm-svn: 94952
2010-01-31 17:12:51 +08:00
// FIXME: Customize for the initialized entity?
if (NumArgs == 0)
S.Diag(Kind.getLocation(), diag::err_reference_without_init)
<< DestType.getNonReferenceType();
else // FIXME: diagnostic below could be better!
S.Diag(Kind.getLocation(), diag::err_reference_has_multiple_inits)
<< SourceRange(Args[0]->getLocStart(), Args[NumArgs - 1]->getLocEnd());
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
case FK_ArrayNeedsInitList:
case FK_ArrayNeedsInitListOrStringLiteral:
S.Diag(Kind.getLocation(), diag::err_array_init_not_init_list)
<< (Failure == FK_ArrayNeedsInitListOrStringLiteral);
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case FK_ArrayTypeMismatch:
case FK_NonConstantArrayInit:
S.Diag(Kind.getLocation(),
(Failure == FK_ArrayTypeMismatch
? diag::err_array_init_different_type
: diag::err_array_init_non_constant_array))
<< DestType.getNonReferenceType()
<< Args[0]->getType()
<< Args[0]->getSourceRange();
break;
case FK_VariableLengthArrayHasInitializer:
S.Diag(Kind.getLocation(), diag::err_variable_object_no_init)
<< Args[0]->getSourceRange();
break;
case FK_AddressOfOverloadFailed: {
DeclAccessPair Found;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
S.ResolveAddressOfOverloadedFunction(Args[0],
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
DestType.getNonReferenceType(),
true,
Found);
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
break;
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
case FK_ReferenceInitOverloadFailed:
case FK_UserConversionOverloadFailed:
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
switch (FailedOverloadResult) {
case OR_Ambiguous:
if (Failure == FK_UserConversionOverloadFailed)
S.Diag(Kind.getLocation(), diag::err_typecheck_ambiguous_condition)
<< Args[0]->getType() << DestType
<< Args[0]->getSourceRange();
else
S.Diag(Kind.getLocation(), diag::err_ref_init_ambiguous)
<< DestType << Args[0]->getType()
<< Args[0]->getSourceRange();
FailedCandidateSet.NoteCandidates(S, OCD_ViableCandidates, Args, NumArgs);
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
case OR_No_Viable_Function:
S.Diag(Kind.getLocation(), diag::err_typecheck_nonviable_condition)
<< Args[0]->getType() << DestType.getNonReferenceType()
<< Args[0]->getSourceRange();
FailedCandidateSet.NoteCandidates(S, OCD_AllCandidates, Args, NumArgs);
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
case OR_Deleted: {
S.Diag(Kind.getLocation(), diag::err_typecheck_deleted_function)
<< Args[0]->getType() << DestType.getNonReferenceType()
<< Args[0]->getSourceRange();
OverloadCandidateSet::iterator Best;
OverloadingResult Ovl
= FailedCandidateSet.BestViableFunction(S, Kind.getLocation(), Best,
true);
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
if (Ovl == OR_Deleted) {
S.Diag(Best->Function->getLocation(), diag::note_unavailable_here)
<< 1 << Best->Function->isDeleted();
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
} else {
llvm_unreachable("Inconsistent overload resolution?");
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
}
break;
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
case OR_Success:
llvm_unreachable("Conversion did not fail!");
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
}
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
case FK_NonConstLValueReferenceBindingToTemporary:
if (isa<InitListExpr>(Args[0])) {
S.Diag(Kind.getLocation(),
diag::err_lvalue_reference_bind_to_initlist)
<< DestType.getNonReferenceType().isVolatileQualified()
<< DestType.getNonReferenceType()
<< Args[0]->getSourceRange();
break;
}
// Intentional fallthrough
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
case FK_NonConstLValueReferenceBindingToUnrelated:
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
S.Diag(Kind.getLocation(),
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
Failure == FK_NonConstLValueReferenceBindingToTemporary
? diag::err_lvalue_reference_bind_to_temporary
: diag::err_lvalue_reference_bind_to_unrelated)
<< DestType.getNonReferenceType().isVolatileQualified()
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
<< DestType.getNonReferenceType()
<< Args[0]->getType()
<< Args[0]->getSourceRange();
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
case FK_RValueReferenceBindingToLValue:
S.Diag(Kind.getLocation(), diag::err_lvalue_to_rvalue_ref)
<< DestType.getNonReferenceType() << Args[0]->getType()
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
<< Args[0]->getSourceRange();
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
case FK_ReferenceInitDropsQualifiers:
S.Diag(Kind.getLocation(), diag::err_reference_bind_drops_quals)
<< DestType.getNonReferenceType()
<< Args[0]->getType()
<< Args[0]->getSourceRange();
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
case FK_ReferenceInitFailed:
S.Diag(Kind.getLocation(), diag::err_reference_bind_failed)
<< DestType.getNonReferenceType()
<< Args[0]->isLValue()
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
<< Args[0]->getType()
<< Args[0]->getSourceRange();
if (DestType.getNonReferenceType()->isObjCObjectPointerType() &&
Args[0]->getType()->isObjCObjectPointerType())
S.EmitRelatedResultTypeNote(Args[0]);
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case FK_ConversionFailed: {
QualType FromType = Args[0]->getType();
PartialDiagnostic PDiag = S.PDiag(diag::err_init_conversion_failed)
<< (int)Entity.getKind()
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
<< DestType
<< Args[0]->isLValue()
<< FromType
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
<< Args[0]->getSourceRange();
S.HandleFunctionTypeMismatch(PDiag, FromType, DestType);
S.Diag(Kind.getLocation(), PDiag);
if (DestType.getNonReferenceType()->isObjCObjectPointerType() &&
Args[0]->getType()->isObjCObjectPointerType())
S.EmitRelatedResultTypeNote(Args[0]);
break;
}
case FK_ConversionFromPropertyFailed:
// No-op. This error has already been reported.
break;
case FK_TooManyInitsForScalar: {
SourceRange R;
if (InitListExpr *InitList = dyn_cast<InitListExpr>(Args[0]))
R = SourceRange(InitList->getInit(0)->getLocEnd(),
InitList->getLocEnd());
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
else
R = SourceRange(Args[0]->getLocEnd(), Args[NumArgs - 1]->getLocEnd());
R.setBegin(S.PP.getLocForEndOfToken(R.getBegin()));
if (Kind.isCStyleOrFunctionalCast())
S.Diag(Kind.getLocation(), diag::err_builtin_func_cast_more_than_one_arg)
<< R;
else
S.Diag(Kind.getLocation(), diag::err_excess_initializers)
<< /*scalar=*/2 << R;
break;
}
case FK_ReferenceBindingToInitList:
S.Diag(Kind.getLocation(), diag::err_reference_bind_init_list)
<< DestType.getNonReferenceType() << Args[0]->getSourceRange();
break;
case FK_InitListBadDestinationType:
S.Diag(Kind.getLocation(), diag::err_init_list_bad_dest_type)
<< (DestType->isRecordType()) << DestType << Args[0]->getSourceRange();
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case FK_ListConstructorOverloadFailed:
case FK_ConstructorOverloadFailed: {
SourceRange ArgsRange;
if (NumArgs)
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
ArgsRange = SourceRange(Args[0]->getLocStart(),
Args[NumArgs - 1]->getLocEnd());
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
if (Failure == FK_ListConstructorOverloadFailed) {
assert(NumArgs == 1 && "List construction from other than 1 argument.");
InitListExpr *InitList = cast<InitListExpr>(Args[0]);
Args = InitList->getInits();
NumArgs = InitList->getNumInits();
}
// FIXME: Using "DestType" for the entity we're printing is probably
// bad.
switch (FailedOverloadResult) {
case OR_Ambiguous:
S.Diag(Kind.getLocation(), diag::err_ovl_ambiguous_init)
<< DestType << ArgsRange;
FailedCandidateSet.NoteCandidates(S, OCD_ViableCandidates,
Args, NumArgs);
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case OR_No_Viable_Function:
Rework base and member initialization in constructors, with several (necessarily simultaneous) changes: - CXXBaseOrMemberInitializer now contains only a single initializer rather than a set of initialiation arguments + a constructor. The single initializer covers all aspects of initialization, including constructor calls as necessary but also cleanup of temporaries created by the initializer (which we never handled before!). - Rework + simplify code generation for CXXBaseOrMemberInitializers, since we can now just emit the initializer as an initializer. - Switched base and member initialization over to the new initialization code (InitializationSequence), so that it - Improved diagnostics for the new initialization code when initializing bases and members, to match the diagnostics produced by the previous (special-purpose) code. - Simplify the representation of type-checked constructor initializers in templates; instead of keeping the fully-type-checked AST, which is rather hard to undo at template instantiation time, throw away the type-checked AST and store the raw expressions in the AST. This simplifies instantiation, but loses a little but of information in the AST. - When type-checking implicit base or member initializers within a dependent context, don't add the generated initializers into the AST, because they'll look like they were explicit. - Record in CXXConstructExpr when the constructor call is to initialize a base class, so that CodeGen does not have to infer it from context. This ensures that we call the right kind of constructor. There are also a few "opportunity" fixes here that were needed to not regress, for example: - Diagnose default-initialization of a const-qualified class that does not have a user-declared default constructor. We had this diagnostic specifically for bases and members, but missed it for variables. That's fixed now. - When defining the implicit constructors, destructor, and copy-assignment operator, set the CurContext to that constructor when we're defining the body. llvm-svn: 94952
2010-01-31 17:12:51 +08:00
if (Kind.getKind() == InitializationKind::IK_Default &&
(Entity.getKind() == InitializedEntity::EK_Base ||
Entity.getKind() == InitializedEntity::EK_Member) &&
isa<CXXConstructorDecl>(S.CurContext)) {
// This is implicit default initialization of a member or
// base within a constructor. If no viable function was
// found, notify the user that she needs to explicitly
// initialize this base/member.
CXXConstructorDecl *Constructor
= cast<CXXConstructorDecl>(S.CurContext);
if (Entity.getKind() == InitializedEntity::EK_Base) {
S.Diag(Kind.getLocation(), diag::err_missing_default_ctor)
<< Constructor->isImplicit()
<< S.Context.getTypeDeclType(Constructor->getParent())
<< /*base=*/0
<< Entity.getType();
RecordDecl *BaseDecl
= Entity.getBaseSpecifier()->getType()->getAs<RecordType>()
->getDecl();
S.Diag(BaseDecl->getLocation(), diag::note_previous_decl)
<< S.Context.getTagDeclType(BaseDecl);
} else {
S.Diag(Kind.getLocation(), diag::err_missing_default_ctor)
<< Constructor->isImplicit()
<< S.Context.getTypeDeclType(Constructor->getParent())
<< /*member=*/1
<< Entity.getName();
S.Diag(Entity.getDecl()->getLocation(), diag::note_field_decl);
if (const RecordType *Record
= Entity.getType()->getAs<RecordType>())
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
S.Diag(Record->getDecl()->getLocation(),
Rework base and member initialization in constructors, with several (necessarily simultaneous) changes: - CXXBaseOrMemberInitializer now contains only a single initializer rather than a set of initialiation arguments + a constructor. The single initializer covers all aspects of initialization, including constructor calls as necessary but also cleanup of temporaries created by the initializer (which we never handled before!). - Rework + simplify code generation for CXXBaseOrMemberInitializers, since we can now just emit the initializer as an initializer. - Switched base and member initialization over to the new initialization code (InitializationSequence), so that it - Improved diagnostics for the new initialization code when initializing bases and members, to match the diagnostics produced by the previous (special-purpose) code. - Simplify the representation of type-checked constructor initializers in templates; instead of keeping the fully-type-checked AST, which is rather hard to undo at template instantiation time, throw away the type-checked AST and store the raw expressions in the AST. This simplifies instantiation, but loses a little but of information in the AST. - When type-checking implicit base or member initializers within a dependent context, don't add the generated initializers into the AST, because they'll look like they were explicit. - Record in CXXConstructExpr when the constructor call is to initialize a base class, so that CodeGen does not have to infer it from context. This ensures that we call the right kind of constructor. There are also a few "opportunity" fixes here that were needed to not regress, for example: - Diagnose default-initialization of a const-qualified class that does not have a user-declared default constructor. We had this diagnostic specifically for bases and members, but missed it for variables. That's fixed now. - When defining the implicit constructors, destructor, and copy-assignment operator, set the CurContext to that constructor when we're defining the body. llvm-svn: 94952
2010-01-31 17:12:51 +08:00
diag::note_previous_decl)
<< S.Context.getTagDeclType(Record->getDecl());
}
break;
}
S.Diag(Kind.getLocation(), diag::err_ovl_no_viable_function_in_init)
<< DestType << ArgsRange;
FailedCandidateSet.NoteCandidates(S, OCD_AllCandidates, Args, NumArgs);
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case OR_Deleted: {
S.Diag(Kind.getLocation(), diag::err_ovl_deleted_init)
<< true << DestType << ArgsRange;
OverloadCandidateSet::iterator Best;
OverloadingResult Ovl
= FailedCandidateSet.BestViableFunction(S, Kind.getLocation(), Best);
if (Ovl == OR_Deleted) {
S.Diag(Best->Function->getLocation(), diag::note_unavailable_here)
<< 1 << Best->Function->isDeleted();
} else {
llvm_unreachable("Inconsistent overload resolution?");
}
break;
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case OR_Success:
llvm_unreachable("Conversion did not fail!");
}
}
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case FK_DefaultInitOfConst:
Rework base and member initialization in constructors, with several (necessarily simultaneous) changes: - CXXBaseOrMemberInitializer now contains only a single initializer rather than a set of initialiation arguments + a constructor. The single initializer covers all aspects of initialization, including constructor calls as necessary but also cleanup of temporaries created by the initializer (which we never handled before!). - Rework + simplify code generation for CXXBaseOrMemberInitializers, since we can now just emit the initializer as an initializer. - Switched base and member initialization over to the new initialization code (InitializationSequence), so that it - Improved diagnostics for the new initialization code when initializing bases and members, to match the diagnostics produced by the previous (special-purpose) code. - Simplify the representation of type-checked constructor initializers in templates; instead of keeping the fully-type-checked AST, which is rather hard to undo at template instantiation time, throw away the type-checked AST and store the raw expressions in the AST. This simplifies instantiation, but loses a little but of information in the AST. - When type-checking implicit base or member initializers within a dependent context, don't add the generated initializers into the AST, because they'll look like they were explicit. - Record in CXXConstructExpr when the constructor call is to initialize a base class, so that CodeGen does not have to infer it from context. This ensures that we call the right kind of constructor. There are also a few "opportunity" fixes here that were needed to not regress, for example: - Diagnose default-initialization of a const-qualified class that does not have a user-declared default constructor. We had this diagnostic specifically for bases and members, but missed it for variables. That's fixed now. - When defining the implicit constructors, destructor, and copy-assignment operator, set the CurContext to that constructor when we're defining the body. llvm-svn: 94952
2010-01-31 17:12:51 +08:00
if (Entity.getKind() == InitializedEntity::EK_Member &&
isa<CXXConstructorDecl>(S.CurContext)) {
// This is implicit default-initialization of a const member in
// a constructor. Complain that it needs to be explicitly
// initialized.
CXXConstructorDecl *Constructor = cast<CXXConstructorDecl>(S.CurContext);
S.Diag(Kind.getLocation(), diag::err_uninitialized_member_in_ctor)
<< Constructor->isImplicit()
<< S.Context.getTypeDeclType(Constructor->getParent())
<< /*const=*/1
<< Entity.getName();
S.Diag(Entity.getDecl()->getLocation(), diag::note_previous_decl)
<< Entity.getName();
} else {
S.Diag(Kind.getLocation(), diag::err_default_init_const)
<< DestType << (bool)DestType->getAs<RecordType>();
}
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case FK_Incomplete:
S.RequireCompleteType(Kind.getLocation(), DestType,
diag::err_init_incomplete_type);
break;
case FK_ListInitializationFailed: {
// Run the init list checker again to emit diagnostics.
InitListExpr* InitList = cast<InitListExpr>(Args[0]);
QualType DestType = Entity.getType();
InitListChecker DiagnoseInitList(S, Entity, InitList,
DestType, /*VerifyOnly=*/false,
Kind.getKind() != InitializationKind::IK_Direct ||
!S.getLangOptions().CPlusPlus0x);
assert(DiagnoseInitList.HadError() &&
"Inconsistent init list check result.");
break;
}
case FK_PlaceholderType: {
// FIXME: Already diagnosed!
break;
}
case FK_InitListElementCopyFailure: {
// Try to perform all copies again.
InitListExpr* InitList = cast<InitListExpr>(Args[0]);
unsigned NumInits = InitList->getNumInits();
QualType DestType = Entity.getType();
QualType E;
bool Success = S.isStdInitializerList(DestType, &E);
(void)Success;
assert(Success && "Where did the std::initializer_list go?");
InitializedEntity HiddenArray = InitializedEntity::InitializeTemporary(
S.Context.getConstantArrayType(E,
llvm::APInt(S.Context.getTypeSize(S.Context.getSizeType()),
NumInits),
ArrayType::Normal, 0));
InitializedEntity Element = InitializedEntity::InitializeElement(S.Context,
0, HiddenArray);
// Show at most 3 errors. Otherwise, you'd get a lot of errors for errors
// where the init list type is wrong, e.g.
// std::initializer_list<void*> list = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 };
// FIXME: Emit a note if we hit the limit?
int ErrorCount = 0;
for (unsigned i = 0; i < NumInits && ErrorCount < 3; ++i) {
Element.setElementIndex(i);
ExprResult Init = S.Owned(InitList->getInit(i));
if (S.PerformCopyInitialization(Element, Init.get()->getExprLoc(), Init)
.isInvalid())
++ErrorCount;
}
break;
}
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
PrintInitLocationNote(S, Entity);
Reimplement reference initialization (C++ [dcl.init.ref]) using the new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow. Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit better than before. Some examples: p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Derived' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base' Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to a value of type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}} ^ ~~ p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class 'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base': struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from ... ^~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long' cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'int' long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type ... ^ ~ p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct Base' cannot bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base' Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field 'i' int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot ... ^ ~~~~~~ p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}} ^ llvm-svn: 90992
2009-12-10 07:02:17 +08:00
return true;
}
void InitializationSequence::dump(raw_ostream &OS) const {
switch (SequenceKind) {
case FailedSequence: {
OS << "Failed sequence: ";
switch (Failure) {
case FK_TooManyInitsForReference:
OS << "too many initializers for reference";
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case FK_ArrayNeedsInitList:
OS << "array requires initializer list";
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case FK_ArrayNeedsInitListOrStringLiteral:
OS << "array requires initializer list or string literal";
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case FK_ArrayTypeMismatch:
OS << "array type mismatch";
break;
case FK_NonConstantArrayInit:
OS << "non-constant array initializer";
break;
case FK_AddressOfOverloadFailed:
OS << "address of overloaded function failed";
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case FK_ReferenceInitOverloadFailed:
OS << "overload resolution for reference initialization failed";
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case FK_NonConstLValueReferenceBindingToTemporary:
OS << "non-const lvalue reference bound to temporary";
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case FK_NonConstLValueReferenceBindingToUnrelated:
OS << "non-const lvalue reference bound to unrelated type";
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case FK_RValueReferenceBindingToLValue:
OS << "rvalue reference bound to an lvalue";
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case FK_ReferenceInitDropsQualifiers:
OS << "reference initialization drops qualifiers";
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case FK_ReferenceInitFailed:
OS << "reference initialization failed";
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case FK_ConversionFailed:
OS << "conversion failed";
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case FK_ConversionFromPropertyFailed:
OS << "conversion from property failed";
break;
case FK_TooManyInitsForScalar:
OS << "too many initializers for scalar";
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case FK_ReferenceBindingToInitList:
OS << "referencing binding to initializer list";
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case FK_InitListBadDestinationType:
OS << "initializer list for non-aggregate, non-scalar type";
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case FK_UserConversionOverloadFailed:
OS << "overloading failed for user-defined conversion";
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case FK_ConstructorOverloadFailed:
OS << "constructor overloading failed";
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case FK_DefaultInitOfConst:
OS << "default initialization of a const variable";
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case FK_Incomplete:
OS << "initialization of incomplete type";
break;
case FK_ListInitializationFailed:
OS << "list initialization checker failure";
break;
case FK_VariableLengthArrayHasInitializer:
OS << "variable length array has an initializer";
break;
case FK_PlaceholderType:
OS << "initializer expression isn't contextually valid";
break;
case FK_ListConstructorOverloadFailed:
OS << "list constructor overloading failed";
break;
case FK_InitListElementCopyFailure:
OS << "copy construction of initializer list element failed";
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
}
OS << '\n';
return;
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case DependentSequence:
OS << "Dependent sequence\n";
return;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case NormalSequence:
OS << "Normal sequence: ";
break;
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
for (step_iterator S = step_begin(), SEnd = step_end(); S != SEnd; ++S) {
if (S != step_begin()) {
OS << " -> ";
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
switch (S->Kind) {
case SK_ResolveAddressOfOverloadedFunction:
OS << "resolve address of overloaded function";
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case SK_CastDerivedToBaseRValue:
OS << "derived-to-base case (rvalue" << S->Type.getAsString() << ")";
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case SK_CastDerivedToBaseXValue:
OS << "derived-to-base case (xvalue" << S->Type.getAsString() << ")";
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case SK_CastDerivedToBaseLValue:
OS << "derived-to-base case (lvalue" << S->Type.getAsString() << ")";
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case SK_BindReference:
OS << "bind reference to lvalue";
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case SK_BindReferenceToTemporary:
OS << "bind reference to a temporary";
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case SK_ExtraneousCopyToTemporary:
OS << "extraneous C++03 copy to temporary";
break;
case SK_UserConversion:
OS << "user-defined conversion via " << *S->Function.Function;
break;
case SK_QualificationConversionRValue:
OS << "qualification conversion (rvalue)";
break;
case SK_QualificationConversionXValue:
OS << "qualification conversion (xvalue)";
break;
case SK_QualificationConversionLValue:
OS << "qualification conversion (lvalue)";
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case SK_ConversionSequence:
OS << "implicit conversion sequence (";
S->ICS->DebugPrint(); // FIXME: use OS
OS << ")";
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case SK_ListInitialization:
OS << "list aggregate initialization";
break;
case SK_ListConstructorCall:
OS << "list initialization via constructor";
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case SK_UnwrapInitList:
OS << "unwrap reference initializer list";
break;
case SK_RewrapInitList:
OS << "rewrap reference initializer list";
break;
case SK_ConstructorInitialization:
OS << "constructor initialization";
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case SK_ZeroInitialization:
OS << "zero initialization";
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case SK_CAssignment:
OS << "C assignment";
break;
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
case SK_StringInit:
OS << "string initialization";
break;
case SK_ObjCObjectConversion:
OS << "Objective-C object conversion";
break;
case SK_ArrayInit:
OS << "array initialization";
break;
case SK_PassByIndirectCopyRestore:
OS << "pass by indirect copy and restore";
break;
case SK_PassByIndirectRestore:
OS << "pass by indirect restore";
break;
case SK_ProduceObjCObject:
OS << "Objective-C object retension";
break;
case SK_StdInitializerList:
OS << "std::initializer_list from initializer list";
break;
}
}
}
void InitializationSequence::dump() const {
dump(llvm::errs());
}
static void DiagnoseNarrowingInInitList(Sema &S, InitializationSequence &Seq,
QualType EntityType,
const Expr *PreInit,
const Expr *PostInit) {
if (Seq.step_begin() == Seq.step_end() || PreInit->isValueDependent())
return;
// A narrowing conversion can only appear as the final implicit conversion in
// an initialization sequence.
const InitializationSequence::Step &LastStep = Seq.step_end()[-1];
if (LastStep.Kind != InitializationSequence::SK_ConversionSequence)
return;
const ImplicitConversionSequence &ICS = *LastStep.ICS;
const StandardConversionSequence *SCS = 0;
switch (ICS.getKind()) {
case ImplicitConversionSequence::StandardConversion:
SCS = &ICS.Standard;
break;
case ImplicitConversionSequence::UserDefinedConversion:
SCS = &ICS.UserDefined.After;
break;
case ImplicitConversionSequence::AmbiguousConversion:
case ImplicitConversionSequence::EllipsisConversion:
case ImplicitConversionSequence::BadConversion:
return;
}
// Determine the type prior to the narrowing conversion. If a conversion
// operator was used, this may be different from both the type of the entity
// and of the pre-initialization expression.
QualType PreNarrowingType = PreInit->getType();
if (Seq.step_begin() + 1 != Seq.step_end())
PreNarrowingType = Seq.step_end()[-2].Type;
// C++11 [dcl.init.list]p7: Check whether this is a narrowing conversion.
APValue ConstantValue;
switch (SCS->getNarrowingKind(S.Context, PostInit, ConstantValue)) {
case NK_Not_Narrowing:
// No narrowing occurred.
return;
case NK_Type_Narrowing:
// This was a floating-to-integer conversion, which is always considered a
// narrowing conversion even if the value is a constant and can be
// represented exactly as an integer.
S.Diag(PostInit->getLocStart(),
S.getLangOptions().MicrosoftExt || !S.getLangOptions().CPlusPlus0x?
diag::warn_init_list_type_narrowing
: S.isSFINAEContext()?
diag::err_init_list_type_narrowing_sfinae
: diag::err_init_list_type_narrowing)
<< PostInit->getSourceRange()
<< PreNarrowingType.getLocalUnqualifiedType()
<< EntityType.getLocalUnqualifiedType();
break;
case NK_Constant_Narrowing:
// A constant value was narrowed.
S.Diag(PostInit->getLocStart(),
S.getLangOptions().MicrosoftExt || !S.getLangOptions().CPlusPlus0x?
diag::warn_init_list_constant_narrowing
: S.isSFINAEContext()?
diag::err_init_list_constant_narrowing_sfinae
: diag::err_init_list_constant_narrowing)
<< PostInit->getSourceRange()
<< ConstantValue.getAsString(S.getASTContext(), EntityType)
<< EntityType.getLocalUnqualifiedType();
break;
case NK_Variable_Narrowing:
// A variable's value may have been narrowed.
S.Diag(PostInit->getLocStart(),
S.getLangOptions().MicrosoftExt || !S.getLangOptions().CPlusPlus0x?
diag::warn_init_list_variable_narrowing
: S.isSFINAEContext()?
diag::err_init_list_variable_narrowing_sfinae
: diag::err_init_list_variable_narrowing)
<< PostInit->getSourceRange()
<< PreNarrowingType.getLocalUnqualifiedType()
<< EntityType.getLocalUnqualifiedType();
break;
}
llvm::SmallString<128> StaticCast;
llvm::raw_svector_ostream OS(StaticCast);
OS << "static_cast<";
if (const TypedefType *TT = EntityType->getAs<TypedefType>()) {
// It's important to use the typedef's name if there is one so that the
// fixit doesn't break code using types like int64_t.
//
// FIXME: This will break if the typedef requires qualification. But
// getQualifiedNameAsString() includes non-machine-parsable components.
OS << *TT->getDecl();
} else if (const BuiltinType *BT = EntityType->getAs<BuiltinType>())
OS << BT->getName(S.getLangOptions());
else {
// Oops, we didn't find the actual type of the variable. Don't emit a fixit
// with a broken cast.
return;
}
OS << ">(";
S.Diag(PostInit->getLocStart(), diag::note_init_list_narrowing_override)
<< PostInit->getSourceRange()
<< FixItHint::CreateInsertion(PostInit->getLocStart(), OS.str())
<< FixItHint::CreateInsertion(
S.getPreprocessor().getLocForEndOfToken(PostInit->getLocEnd()), ")");
}
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// Initialization helper functions
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
bool
Sema::CanPerformCopyInitialization(const InitializedEntity &Entity,
ExprResult Init) {
if (Init.isInvalid())
return false;
Expr *InitE = Init.get();
assert(InitE && "No initialization expression");
InitializationKind Kind = InitializationKind::CreateCopy(SourceLocation(),
SourceLocation());
InitializationSequence Seq(*this, Entity, Kind, &InitE, 1);
return !Seq.Failed();
}
2011-01-27 15:10:08 +08:00
ExprResult
Sema::PerformCopyInitialization(const InitializedEntity &Entity,
SourceLocation EqualLoc,
ExprResult Init,
bool TopLevelOfInitList) {
if (Init.isInvalid())
return ExprError();
Expr *InitE = Init.get();
assert(InitE && "No initialization expression?");
if (EqualLoc.isInvalid())
EqualLoc = InitE->getLocStart();
InitializationKind Kind = InitializationKind::CreateCopy(InitE->getLocStart(),
EqualLoc);
InitializationSequence Seq(*this, Entity, Kind, &InitE, 1);
Init.release();
ExprResult Result = Seq.Perform(*this, Entity, Kind, MultiExprArg(&InitE, 1));
if (!Result.isInvalid() && TopLevelOfInitList)
DiagnoseNarrowingInInitList(*this, Seq, Entity.getType(),
InitE, Result.get());
return Result;
}