maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/clang/test/Misc/warning-flags.c

250 lines
11 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

[diagtool] Write to llvm::outs() by default instead of llvm::errs() llvm-svn: 158954
2012-06-22 08:33:20 +08:00
RUN: diagtool list-warnings | FileCheck %s
Add diagtool-based test where we enforce that no additional warnings can be added to Clang without a -W flag. llvm-svn: 137369
2011-08-12 06:06:55 +08:00
This test serves two purposes:
(1) It documents all existing warnings that currently have no associated -W flag,
and ensures that the list never grows.
If take an existing warning and add a flag, this test will fail. To
fix this test, simply remove that warning from the list below.
(2) It prevents us adding new warnings to Clang that have no -W flag. All
new warnings should have -W flags.
If you add a new warning without a flag, this test will fail. To fix
this test, simply add a warning group to that warning.
The list of warnings below should NEVER grow. It should gradually shrink to 0.
Revert rr159875, "Implement -Wpedantic and --no-pedantic to complement -Weverything." It broke several builds. I suspect FileCheck might match assertion failure, even if clang/test/Misc/warning-flags.c passed the test. > 0. Program arguments: bin/./clang -### -pedantic -Wpedantic clang/test/Driver/warning-options.cpp llvm-svn: 159886
2012-07-07 10:48:02 +08:00
CHECK: Warnings without flags (229):
CHECK-NEXT: ext_anonymous_struct_union_qualified
CHECK-NEXT: ext_binary_literal
CHECK-NEXT: ext_cast_fn_obj
CHECK-NEXT: ext_delete_void_ptr_operand
CHECK-NEXT: ext_designated_init
CHECK-NEXT: ext_duplicate_declspec
CHECK-NEXT: ext_ellipsis_exception_spec
CHECK-NEXT: ext_enum_friend
CHECK-NEXT: ext_enum_value_not_int
CHECK-NEXT: ext_enumerator_list_comma
CHECK-NEXT: ext_expected_semi_decl_list
CHECK-NEXT: ext_explicit_instantiation_without_qualified_id
CHECK-NEXT: ext_explicit_specialization_storage_class
CHECK-NEXT: ext_forward_ref_enum
CHECK-NEXT: ext_freestanding_complex
CHECK-NEXT: ext_hexconstant_invalid
CHECK-NEXT: ext_ident_list_in_param
CHECK-NEXT: ext_imaginary_constant
CHECK-NEXT: ext_implicit_lib_function_decl
CHECK-NEXT: ext_in_class_initializer_non_constant
CHECK-NEXT: ext_integer_complement_complex
CHECK-NEXT: ext_integer_complex
CHECK-NEXT: ext_integer_increment_complex
CHECK-NEXT: ext_invalid_sign_spec
CHECK-NEXT: ext_missing_declspec
CHECK-NEXT: ext_missing_whitespace_after_macro_name
CHECK-NEXT: ext_new_paren_array_nonconst
CHECK-NEXT: ext_nonstandard_escape
CHECK-NEXT: ext_param_not_declared
CHECK-NEXT: ext_plain_complex
CHECK-NEXT: ext_pp_bad_vaargs_use
CHECK-NEXT: ext_pp_comma_expr
CHECK-NEXT: ext_pp_ident_directive
CHECK-NEXT: ext_pp_include_next_directive
CHECK-NEXT: ext_pp_line_too_big
CHECK-NEXT: ext_pp_macro_redef
CHECK-NEXT: ext_pp_warning_directive
CHECK-NEXT: ext_return_has_void_expr
CHECK-NEXT: ext_subscript_non_lvalue
CHECK-NEXT: ext_template_arg_extra_parens
CHECK-NEXT: ext_thread_before
CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_addrof_void
CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_cast_nonscalar
CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_cast_to_union
CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_comparison_of_distinct_pointers
CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_comparison_of_distinct_pointers_nonstandard
CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_comparison_of_fptr_to_void
CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_comparison_of_pointer_integer
CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_cond_incompatible_operands
CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_cond_incompatible_operands_nonstandard
CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_cond_one_void
CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_convert_pointer_void_func
CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_ordered_comparison_of_function_pointers
CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_ordered_comparison_of_pointer_and_zero
CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_ordered_comparison_of_pointer_integer
CHECK-NEXT: ext_typecheck_zero_array_size
CHECK-NEXT: ext_unknown_escape
CHECK-NEXT: ext_using_undefined_std
CHECK-NEXT: ext_vla_folded_to_constant
Add diagtool-based test where we enforce that no additional warnings can be added to Clang without a -W flag. llvm-svn: 137369
2011-08-12 06:06:55 +08:00
CHECK-NEXT: pp_include_next_absolute_path
CHECK-NEXT: pp_include_next_in_primary
CHECK-NEXT: pp_invalid_string_literal
CHECK-NEXT: pp_out_of_date_dependency
CHECK-NEXT: pp_poisoning_existing_macro
CHECK-NEXT: pp_pragma_once_in_main_file
CHECK-NEXT: pp_pragma_sysheader_in_main_file
CHECK-NEXT: pp_undef_builtin_macro
CHECK-NEXT: w_asm_qualifier_ignored
CHECK-NEXT: warn_accessor_property_type_mismatch
CHECK-NEXT: warn_anon_bitfield_width_exceeds_type_size
CHECK-NEXT: warn_asm_label_on_auto_decl
CHECK-NEXT: warn_attribute_ibaction
CHECK-NEXT: warn_attribute_iboutlet
CHECK-NEXT: warn_attribute_ignored
CHECK-NEXT: warn_attribute_ignored_for_field_of_type
CHECK-NEXT: warn_attribute_malloc_pointer_only
CHECK-NEXT: warn_attribute_nonnull_no_pointers
CHECK-NEXT: warn_attribute_precede_definition
CHECK-NEXT: warn_attribute_sentinel_named_arguments
CHECK-NEXT: warn_attribute_sentinel_not_variadic
CHECK-NEXT: warn_attribute_type_not_supported
CHECK-NEXT: warn_attribute_unknown_visibility
CHECK-NEXT: warn_attribute_void_function_method
CHECK-NEXT: warn_attribute_weak_import_invalid_on_definition
CHECK-NEXT: warn_attribute_weak_on_field
CHECK-NEXT: warn_attribute_weak_on_local
CHECK-NEXT: warn_attribute_wrong_decl_type
CHECK-NEXT: warn_bitfield_width_exceeds_type_size
CHECK-NEXT: warn_bool_switch_condition
CHECK-NEXT: warn_braces_around_scalar_init
CHECK-NEXT: warn_c_kext
CHECK-NEXT: warn_call_to_pure_virtual_member_function_from_ctor_dtor
CHECK-NEXT: warn_call_wrong_number_of_arguments
CHECK-NEXT: warn_case_empty_range
CHECK-NEXT: warn_char_constant_too_large
CHECK-NEXT: warn_cmdline_missing_macro_defs
CHECK-NEXT: warn_collection_expr_type
CHECK-NEXT: warn_conflicting_param_types
CHECK-NEXT: warn_conflicting_ret_types
CHECK-NEXT: warn_conflicting_variadic
CHECK-NEXT: warn_conv_to_base_not_used
CHECK-NEXT: warn_conv_to_self_not_used
CHECK-NEXT: warn_conv_to_void_not_used
CHECK-NEXT: warn_delete_array_type
CHECK-NEXT: warn_double_const_requires_fp64
CHECK-NEXT: warn_drv_assuming_mfloat_abi_is
CHECK-NEXT: warn_drv_clang_unsupported
CHECK-NEXT: warn_drv_input_file_unused
CHECK-NEXT: warn_drv_not_using_clang_arch
CHECK-NEXT: warn_drv_not_using_clang_cpp
CHECK-NEXT: warn_drv_not_using_clang_cxx
CHECK-NEXT: warn_drv_objc_gc_unsupported
CHECK-NEXT: warn_drv_pch_not_first_include
CHECK-NEXT: warn_drv_preprocessed_input_file_unused
CHECK-NEXT: warn_dup_category_def
CHECK-NEXT: warn_duplicate_protocol_def
CHECK-NEXT: warn_enum_too_large
CHECK-NEXT: warn_enum_value_overflow
CHECK-NEXT: warn_enumerator_too_large
CHECK-NEXT: warn_exception_caught_by_earlier_handler
Revert rr159875, "Implement -Wpedantic and --no-pedantic to complement -Weverything." It broke several builds. I suspect FileCheck might match assertion failure, even if clang/test/Misc/warning-flags.c passed the test. > 0. Program arguments: bin/./clang -### -pedantic -Wpedantic clang/test/Driver/warning-options.cpp llvm-svn: 159886
2012-07-07 10:48:02 +08:00
CHECK-NEXT: warn_excess_initializers
CHECK-NEXT: warn_excess_initializers_in_char_array_initializer
CHECK-NEXT: warn_expected_qualified_after_typename
Add diagtool-based test where we enforce that no additional warnings can be added to Clang without a -W flag. llvm-svn: 137369
2011-08-12 06:06:55 +08:00
CHECK-NEXT: warn_extraneous_char_constant
CHECK-NEXT: warn_fe_cc_log_diagnostics_failure
CHECK-NEXT: warn_fe_cc_print_header_failure
CHECK-NEXT: warn_fe_macro_contains_embedded_newline
CHECK-NEXT: warn_file_asm_volatile
CHECK-NEXT: warn_function_attribute_wrong_type
CHECK-NEXT: warn_gc_attribute_weak_on_local
CHECK-NEXT: warn_gnu_inline_attribute_requires_inline
Revert rr159875, "Implement -Wpedantic and --no-pedantic to complement -Weverything." It broke several builds. I suspect FileCheck might match assertion failure, even if clang/test/Misc/warning-flags.c passed the test. > 0. Program arguments: bin/./clang -### -pedantic -Wpedantic clang/test/Driver/warning-options.cpp llvm-svn: 159886
2012-07-07 10:48:02 +08:00
CHECK-NEXT: warn_hex_escape_too_large
Add diagtool-based test where we enforce that no additional warnings can be added to Clang without a -W flag. llvm-svn: 137369
2011-08-12 06:06:55 +08:00
CHECK-NEXT: warn_ignoring_ftabstop_value
Revert rr159875, "Implement -Wpedantic and --no-pedantic to complement -Weverything." It broke several builds. I suspect FileCheck might match assertion failure, even if clang/test/Misc/warning-flags.c passed the test. > 0. Program arguments: bin/./clang -### -pedantic -Wpedantic clang/test/Driver/warning-options.cpp llvm-svn: 159886
2012-07-07 10:48:02 +08:00
CHECK-NEXT: warn_illegal_constant_array_size
Add diagtool-based test where we enforce that no additional warnings can be added to Clang without a -W flag. llvm-svn: 137369
2011-08-12 06:06:55 +08:00
CHECK-NEXT: warn_implements_nscopying
CHECK-NEXT: warn_incompatible_qualified_id
Revert rr159875, "Implement -Wpedantic and --no-pedantic to complement -Weverything." It broke several builds. I suspect FileCheck might match assertion failure, even if clang/test/Misc/warning-flags.c passed the test. > 0. Program arguments: bin/./clang -### -pedantic -Wpedantic clang/test/Driver/warning-options.cpp llvm-svn: 159886
2012-07-07 10:48:02 +08:00
CHECK-NEXT: warn_initializer_string_for_char_array_too_long
Add diagtool-based test where we enforce that no additional warnings can be added to Clang without a -W flag. llvm-svn: 137369
2011-08-12 06:06:55 +08:00
CHECK-NEXT: warn_inline_namespace_reopened_noninline
CHECK-NEXT: warn_integer_too_large
CHECK-NEXT: warn_integer_too_large_for_signed
CHECK-NEXT: warn_invalid_asm_cast_lvalue
Revert rr159875, "Implement -Wpedantic and --no-pedantic to complement -Weverything." It broke several builds. I suspect FileCheck might match assertion failure, even if clang/test/Misc/warning-flags.c passed the test. > 0. Program arguments: bin/./clang -### -pedantic -Wpedantic clang/test/Driver/warning-options.cpp llvm-svn: 159886
2012-07-07 10:48:02 +08:00
CHECK-NEXT: warn_many_braces_around_scalar_init
Add diagtool-based test where we enforce that no additional warnings can be added to Clang without a -W flag. llvm-svn: 137369
2011-08-12 06:06:55 +08:00
CHECK-NEXT: warn_maynot_respond
CHECK-NEXT: warn_member_extra_qualification
CHECK-NEXT: warn_method_param_redefinition
Revert rr159875, "Implement -Wpedantic and --no-pedantic to complement -Weverything." It broke several builds. I suspect FileCheck might match assertion failure, even if clang/test/Misc/warning-flags.c passed the test. > 0. Program arguments: bin/./clang -### -pedantic -Wpedantic clang/test/Driver/warning-options.cpp llvm-svn: 159886
2012-07-07 10:48:02 +08:00
CHECK-NEXT: warn_mismatched_exception_spec
Add diagtool-based test where we enforce that no additional warnings can be added to Clang without a -W flag. llvm-svn: 137369
2011-08-12 06:06:55 +08:00
CHECK-NEXT: warn_missing_case_for_condition
Revert rr159875, "Implement -Wpedantic and --no-pedantic to complement -Weverything." It broke several builds. I suspect FileCheck might match assertion failure, even if clang/test/Misc/warning-flags.c passed the test. > 0. Program arguments: bin/./clang -### -pedantic -Wpedantic clang/test/Driver/warning-options.cpp llvm-svn: 159886
2012-07-07 10:48:02 +08:00
CHECK-NEXT: warn_missing_dependent_template_keyword
Add diagtool-based test where we enforce that no additional warnings can be added to Clang without a -W flag. llvm-svn: 137369
2011-08-12 06:06:55 +08:00
CHECK-NEXT: warn_missing_exception_specification
CHECK-NEXT: warn_missing_whitespace_after_macro_name
CHECK-NEXT: warn_multiple_method_decl
CHECK-NEXT: warn_no_constructor_for_refconst
CHECK-NEXT: warn_nonnull_pointers_only
CHECK-NEXT: warn_not_compound_assign
CHECK-NEXT: warn_ns_attribute_wrong_parameter_type
CHECK-NEXT: warn_ns_attribute_wrong_return_type
CHECK-NEXT: warn_objc_object_attribute_wrong_type
CHECK-NEXT: warn_objc_property_copy_missing_on_block
CHECK-NEXT: warn_objc_protocol_qualifier_missing_id
Revert rr159875, "Implement -Wpedantic and --no-pedantic to complement -Weverything." It broke several builds. I suspect FileCheck might match assertion failure, even if clang/test/Misc/warning-flags.c passed the test. > 0. Program arguments: bin/./clang -### -pedantic -Wpedantic clang/test/Driver/warning-options.cpp llvm-svn: 159886
2012-07-07 10:48:02 +08:00
CHECK-NEXT: warn_octal_escape_too_large
Add diagtool-based test where we enforce that no additional warnings can be added to Clang without a -W flag. llvm-svn: 137369
2011-08-12 06:06:55 +08:00
CHECK-NEXT: warn_odr_tag_type_inconsistent
CHECK-NEXT: warn_on_superclass_use
Revert rr159875, "Implement -Wpedantic and --no-pedantic to complement -Weverything." It broke several builds. I suspect FileCheck might match assertion failure, even if clang/test/Misc/warning-flags.c passed the test. > 0. Program arguments: bin/./clang -### -pedantic -Wpedantic clang/test/Driver/warning-options.cpp llvm-svn: 159886
2012-07-07 10:48:02 +08:00
CHECK-NEXT: warn_param_default_argument_redefinition
Add diagtool-based test where we enforce that no additional warnings can be added to Clang without a -W flag. llvm-svn: 137369
2011-08-12 06:06:55 +08:00
CHECK-NEXT: warn_partial_specs_not_deducible
CHECK-NEXT: warn_pointer_attribute_wrong_type
CHECK-NEXT: warn_pp_convert_lhs_to_positive
CHECK-NEXT: warn_pp_convert_rhs_to_positive
CHECK-NEXT: warn_pp_expr_overflow
CHECK-NEXT: warn_pp_line_decimal
CHECK-NEXT: warn_pragma_align_expected_equal
CHECK-NEXT: warn_pragma_align_invalid_option
CHECK-NEXT: warn_pragma_debug_unexpected_command
CHECK-NEXT: warn_pragma_expected_colon
CHECK-NEXT: warn_pragma_expected_enable_disable
CHECK-NEXT: warn_pragma_expected_identifier
CHECK-NEXT: warn_pragma_expected_lparen
CHECK-NEXT: warn_pragma_expected_rparen
CHECK-NEXT: warn_pragma_extra_tokens_at_eol
CHECK-NEXT: warn_pragma_ms_struct
CHECK-NEXT: warn_pragma_options_align_reset_failed
CHECK-NEXT: warn_pragma_options_align_unsupported_option
CHECK-NEXT: warn_pragma_options_expected_align
CHECK-NEXT: warn_pragma_pack_invalid_action
CHECK-NEXT: warn_pragma_pack_invalid_alignment
CHECK-NEXT: warn_pragma_pack_malformed
CHECK-NEXT: warn_pragma_pack_pop_failed
CHECK-NEXT: warn_pragma_pack_pop_identifer_and_alignment
CHECK-NEXT: warn_pragma_pack_show
CHECK-NEXT: warn_pragma_pop_macro_no_push
CHECK-NEXT: warn_pragma_unknown_extension
CHECK-NEXT: warn_pragma_unused_expected_punc
CHECK-NEXT: warn_pragma_unused_expected_var
CHECK-NEXT: warn_pragma_unused_expected_var_arg
CHECK-NEXT: warn_pragma_unused_undeclared_var
CHECK-NEXT: warn_previous_alias_decl
CHECK-NEXT: warn_printf_asterisk_missing_arg
CHECK-NEXT: warn_property_attr_mismatch
CHECK-NEXT: warn_property_attribute
CHECK-NEXT: warn_property_getter_owning_mismatch
CHECK-NEXT: warn_property_types_are_incompatible
CHECK-NEXT: warn_readonly_property
CHECK-NEXT: warn_redecl_library_builtin
CHECK-NEXT: warn_redeclaration_without_attribute_prev_attribute_ignored
CHECK-NEXT: warn_register_objc_catch_parm
CHECK-NEXT: warn_related_result_type_compatibility_class
CHECK-NEXT: warn_related_result_type_compatibility_protocol
CHECK-NEXT: warn_second_parameter_of_va_start_not_last_named_argument
CHECK-NEXT: warn_second_parameter_to_va_arg_never_compatible
CHECK-NEXT: warn_standalone_specifier
CHECK-NEXT: warn_static_inline_explicit_inst_ignored
Revert rr159875, "Implement -Wpedantic and --no-pedantic to complement -Weverything." It broke several builds. I suspect FileCheck might match assertion failure, even if clang/test/Misc/warning-flags.c passed the test. > 0. Program arguments: bin/./clang -### -pedantic -Wpedantic clang/test/Driver/warning-options.cpp llvm-svn: 159886
2012-07-07 10:48:02 +08:00
CHECK-NEXT: warn_static_non_static
Add diagtool-based test where we enforce that no additional warnings can be added to Clang without a -W flag. llvm-svn: 137369
2011-08-12 06:06:55 +08:00
CHECK-NEXT: warn_template_export_unsupported
CHECK-NEXT: warn_template_spec_extra_headers
CHECK-NEXT: warn_tentative_incomplete_array
CHECK-NEXT: warn_transparent_union_attribute_field_size_align
CHECK-NEXT: warn_transparent_union_attribute_floating
CHECK-NEXT: warn_transparent_union_attribute_not_definition
CHECK-NEXT: warn_transparent_union_attribute_zero_fields
CHECK-NEXT: warn_typecheck_function_qualifiers
CHECK-NEXT: warn_unavailable_fwdclass_message
CHECK-NEXT: warn_undef_interface
CHECK-NEXT: warn_undef_interface_suggest
CHECK-NEXT: warn_undef_protocolref
CHECK-NEXT: warn_undefined_internal
Fix this test which had encoded the typo fixed in r137814. llvm-svn: 137821
2011-08-17 16:56:14 +08:00
CHECK-NEXT: warn_unknown_analyzer_checker
Add diagtool-based test where we enforce that no additional warnings can be added to Clang without a -W flag. llvm-svn: 137369
2011-08-12 06:06:55 +08:00
CHECK-NEXT: warn_unknown_method_family
CHECK-NEXT: warn_use_out_of_scope_declaration
CHECK-NEXT: warn_weak_identifier_undeclared
CHECK-NEXT: warn_weak_import