maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/vtable-layout.cpp

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

1929 lines
59 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

Make -fdump-vtable-layouts print to stdout, not stderr This makes it consistent with -fdump-record-layouts, which was moved to outs() in r186219. My reasoning for going with stdout is that when one of these options is present, the layouts are really a program output, and shouldn't be interleaved with diagnostics, which are on stderr. Reviewers: timurrrr Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2127 llvm-svn: 194279
2013-11-09 05:28:00 +08:00
// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -triple=x86_64-apple-darwin10 -emit-llvm-only -fdump-vtable-layouts > %t
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-1 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-2 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-3 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-4 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-5 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-6 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-7 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-8 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-9 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-10 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-11 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-12 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-13 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-14 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-15 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-16 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-17 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-18 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-19 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-20 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-21 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-22 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-23 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-24 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-25 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-26 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-27 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-28 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-29 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-30 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-31 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-32 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-33 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-34 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-35 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-36 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-37 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-38 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-39 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-40 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-41 %s < %t
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-42 %s < %t
Change CollectPrimaryBases to collect the bases in the right order. Fixes one half of PR9660. llvm-svn: 129252
2011-04-11 02:00:32 +08:00
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-43 %s < %t
For the annals of subtle but terrible bugs: fix a longstanding bug in vtable layout where virtual methods inherited from virtual bases could be assigned the same vcall adjustment slot if they shared a name and parameter signature but differed in their cv-qualification. The code was already trying to handle this case, but unfortunately used the ordinary type qualifiers (which are always empty here) instead of the method qualifiers. This seems like something that the API should discourage, but I don't know how to carry that principle out in this instance. Eliminate this function's need for an ASTContext while we're at it. This bug affects the ABI, and fixing it brings us into accord with the Itanium ABI (and GCC's implementation of it), but, obviously, technically breaks full compatibility with previous releases of Clang. Just letting you know. llvm-svn: 153168
2012-03-21 14:57:19 +08:00
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-44 %s < %t
Note deleted functions when dumping vtables. llvm-svn: 166056
2012-10-17 04:25:33 +08:00
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-45 %s < %t
... and actually run it llvm-svn: 183309
2013-06-05 21:50:24 +08:00
// RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-46 %s < %t
Check in the beginnings of my new vtable layout builder idea. Right now, it's off by default but can be tested by passing -fdump-vtable-layouts to clang -cc1. This option will cause all vtables that will normally be emitted as part of codegen to also be dumped using the new layout code. I've also added a very simple new vtable layout test case. llvm-svn: 95865
2010-02-11 16:02:13 +08:00
Add basic support for simple non-virtual 'this' pointer adjustments. llvm-svn: 96136
2010-02-14 07:40:17 +08:00
// For now, just verify this doesn't crash.
namespace test0 {
struct Obj {};
struct Base { virtual const Obj *foo() = 0; };
struct Derived : Base { virtual Obj *foo() { return new Obj(); } };
void test(Derived *D) { D->foo(); }
}
namespace Test1 {
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-1: Vtable for 'Test1::A' (3 entries).
// CHECK-1-NEXT: 0 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-1-NEXT: 1 | Test1::A RTTI
// CHECK-1-NEXT: -- (Test1::A, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-1-NEXT: 2 | void Test1::A::f()
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-1: VTable indices for 'Test1::A' (1 entries).
// CHECK-1-NEXT: 0 | void Test1::A::f()
Check in the beginnings of my new vtable layout builder idea. Right now, it's off by default but can be tested by passing -fdump-vtable-layouts to clang -cc1. This option will cause all vtables that will normally be emitted as part of codegen to also be dumped using the new layout code. I've also added a very simple new vtable layout test case. llvm-svn: 95865
2010-02-11 16:02:13 +08:00
struct A {
virtual void f();
};
void A::f() { }
More work on vtable layout. We can now layout vtables with primary bases. llvm-svn: 95965
2010-02-12 13:25:12 +08:00
Check in the beginnings of my new vtable layout builder idea. Right now, it's off by default but can be tested by passing -fdump-vtable-layouts to clang -cc1. This option will cause all vtables that will normally be emitted as part of codegen to also be dumped using the new layout code. I've also added a very simple new vtable layout test case. llvm-svn: 95865
2010-02-11 16:02:13 +08:00
}
More vtable layout dumper improvements. Handle destructors, dump the complete function type of the member functions (using PredefinedExpr::ComputeName. llvm-svn: 95887
2010-02-12 02:20:28 +08:00
namespace Test2 {
// This is a smoke test of the vtable dumper.
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-2: Vtable for 'Test2::A' (9 entries).
// CHECK-2-NEXT: 0 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-2-NEXT: 1 | Test2::A RTTI
// CHECK-2-NEXT: -- (Test2::A, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-2-NEXT: 2 | void Test2::A::f()
// CHECK-2-NEXT: 3 | void Test2::A::f() const
// CHECK-2-NEXT: 4 | Test2::A *Test2::A::g(int)
// CHECK-2-NEXT: 5 | Test2::A::~A() [complete]
// CHECK-2-NEXT: 6 | Test2::A::~A() [deleting]
// CHECK-2-NEXT: 7 | void Test2::A::h()
'const std::type_info*' instead of 'std::type_info const*' llvm-svn: 113092
2010-09-05 08:17:29 +08:00
// CHECK-2-NEXT: 8 | Test2::A &Test2::A::operator=(const Test2::A &)
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-2: VTable indices for 'Test2::A' (7 entries).
// CHECK-2-NEXT: 0 | void Test2::A::f()
// CHECK-2-NEXT: 1 | void Test2::A::f() const
// CHECK-2-NEXT: 2 | Test2::A *Test2::A::g(int)
// CHECK-2-NEXT: 3 | Test2::A::~A() [complete]
// CHECK-2-NEXT: 4 | Test2::A::~A() [deleting]
// CHECK-2-NEXT: 5 | void Test2::A::h()
// CHECK-2-NEXT: 6 | Test2::A &Test2::A::operator=(const Test2::A &)
More vtable layout dumper improvements. Handle destructors, dump the complete function type of the member functions (using PredefinedExpr::ComputeName. llvm-svn: 95887
2010-02-12 02:20:28 +08:00
struct A {
virtual void f();
virtual void f() const;
virtual A* g(int a);
virtual ~A();
virtual void h();
Add virtual operator= example. llvm-svn: 95888
2010-02-12 02:21:49 +08:00
virtual A& operator=(const A&);
More vtable layout dumper improvements. Handle destructors, dump the complete function type of the member functions (using PredefinedExpr::ComputeName. llvm-svn: 95887
2010-02-12 02:20:28 +08:00
};
void A::f() { }
When dumping vtables, dump whether a virtual member function is pure or not. llvm-svn: 95963
2010-02-12 10:38:13 +08:00
// Another simple vtable dumper test.
More work on vtable layout. We can now layout vtables with primary bases. llvm-svn: 95965
2010-02-12 13:25:12 +08:00
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-3: Vtable for 'Test2::B' (6 entries).
// CHECK-3-NEXT: 0 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-3-NEXT: 1 | Test2::B RTTI
// CHECK-3-NEXT: -- (Test2::B, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-3-NEXT: 2 | void Test2::B::f()
// CHECK-3-NEXT: 3 | void Test2::B::g() [pure]
// CHECK-3-NEXT: 4 | Test2::B::~B() [complete] [pure]
// CHECK-3-NEXT: 5 | Test2::B::~B() [deleting] [pure]
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-3: VTable indices for 'Test2::B' (4 entries).
// CHECK-3-NEXT: 0 | void Test2::B::f()
// CHECK-3-NEXT: 1 | void Test2::B::g()
// CHECK-3-NEXT: 2 | Test2::B::~B() [complete]
// CHECK-3-NEXT: 3 | Test2::B::~B() [deleting]
When dumping vtables, dump whether a virtual member function is pure or not. llvm-svn: 95963
2010-02-12 10:38:13 +08:00
struct B {
virtual void f();
virtual void g() = 0;
virtual ~B() = 0;
};
More work on vtable layout. We can now layout vtables with primary bases. llvm-svn: 95965
2010-02-12 13:25:12 +08:00
void B::f() { }
}
namespace Test3 {
When dumping vtables, dump whether a virtual member function is pure or not. llvm-svn: 95963
2010-02-12 10:38:13 +08:00
More work on vtable layout. We can now layout vtables with primary bases. llvm-svn: 95965
2010-02-12 13:25:12 +08:00
// If a function in a derived class overrides a function in a primary base,
// then the function should not have an entry in the derived class (unless the return
// value requires adjusting).
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-4: Vtable for 'Test3::A' (3 entries).
// CHECK-4-NEXT: 0 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-4-NEXT: 1 | Test3::A RTTI
// CHECK-4-NEXT: -- (Test3::A, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-4-NEXT: 2 | void Test3::A::f()
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-4: VTable indices for 'Test3::A' (1 entries).
// CHECK-4-NEXT: 0 | void Test3::A::f()
More work on vtable layout. We can now layout vtables with primary bases. llvm-svn: 95965
2010-02-12 13:25:12 +08:00
struct A {
virtual void f();
};
void A::f() { }
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-5: Vtable for 'Test3::B' (4 entries).
// CHECK-5-NEXT: 0 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-5-NEXT: 1 | Test3::B RTTI
// CHECK-5-NEXT: -- (Test3::A, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-5-NEXT: -- (Test3::B, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-5-NEXT: 2 | void Test3::B::f()
// CHECK-5-NEXT: 3 | void Test3::B::g()
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-5: VTable indices for 'Test3::B' (2 entries).
// CHECK-5-NEXT: 0 | void Test3::B::f()
// CHECK-5-NEXT: 1 | void Test3::B::g()
More work on vtable layout. We can now layout vtables with primary bases. llvm-svn: 95965
2010-02-12 13:25:12 +08:00
struct B : A {
virtual void f();
virtual void g();
};
When dumping vtables, dump whether a virtual member function is pure or not. llvm-svn: 95963
2010-02-12 10:38:13 +08:00
void B::f() { }
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-6: Vtable for 'Test3::C' (5 entries).
// CHECK-6-NEXT: 0 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-6-NEXT: 1 | Test3::C RTTI
// CHECK-6-NEXT: -- (Test3::A, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-6-NEXT: -- (Test3::C, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-6-NEXT: 2 | void Test3::A::f()
// CHECK-6-NEXT: 3 | void Test3::C::g()
// CHECK-6-NEXT: 4 | void Test3::C::h()
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-6: VTable indices for 'Test3::C' (2 entries).
// CHECK-6-NEXT: 1 | void Test3::C::g()
// CHECK-6-NEXT: 2 | void Test3::C::h()
More work on vtable layout. We can now layout vtables with primary bases. llvm-svn: 95965
2010-02-12 13:25:12 +08:00
struct C : A {
virtual void g();
virtual void h();
};
void C::g() { }
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-7: Vtable for 'Test3::D' (5 entries).
// CHECK-7-NEXT: 0 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-7-NEXT: 1 | Test3::D RTTI
// CHECK-7-NEXT: -- (Test3::A, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-7-NEXT: -- (Test3::B, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-7-NEXT: -- (Test3::D, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-7-NEXT: 2 | void Test3::D::f()
// CHECK-7-NEXT: 3 | void Test3::D::g()
// CHECK-7-NEXT: 4 | void Test3::D::h()
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-7: VTable indices for 'Test3::D' (3 entries).
// CHECK-7-NEXT: 0 | void Test3::D::f()
// CHECK-7-NEXT: 1 | void Test3::D::g()
// CHECK-7-NEXT: 2 | void Test3::D::h()
More work on vtable layout. We can now layout vtables with primary bases. llvm-svn: 95965
2010-02-12 13:25:12 +08:00
struct D : B {
virtual void f();
virtual void g();
virtual void h();
};
void D::f() { }
More vtable layout dumper improvements. Handle destructors, dump the complete function type of the member functions (using PredefinedExpr::ComputeName. llvm-svn: 95887
2010-02-12 02:20:28 +08:00
}
Fix a bug causing an assertion when a covariant return type differed from an overriden type only by reduced qualification. llvm-svn: 95968
2010-02-12 14:15:07 +08:00
More work on covariant return types. We now handle non-virtual adjustments fine. llvm-svn: 96114
2010-02-14 04:11:51 +08:00
namespace Test4 {
Handle virtual bases in return adjustment types. llvm-svn: 96119
2010-02-14 05:07:32 +08:00
// Test non-virtual result adjustments.
More work on covariant return types. We now handle non-virtual adjustments fine. llvm-svn: 96114
2010-02-14 04:11:51 +08:00
struct R1 { int r1; };
struct R2 { int r2; };
struct R3 : R1, R2 { int r3; };
struct A {
virtual R2 *f();
};
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-8: Vtable for 'Test4::B' (4 entries).
// CHECK-8-NEXT: 0 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-8-NEXT: 1 | Test4::B RTTI
// CHECK-8-NEXT: -- (Test4::A, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-8-NEXT: -- (Test4::B, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-8-NEXT: 2 | Test4::R3 *Test4::B::f()
// CHECK-8-NEXT: [return adjustment: 4 non-virtual]
// CHECK-8-NEXT: 3 | Test4::R3 *Test4::B::f()
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-8: VTable indices for 'Test4::B' (1 entries).
// CHECK-8-NEXT: 1 | Test4::R3 *Test4::B::f()
More work on covariant return types. We now handle non-virtual adjustments fine. llvm-svn: 96114
2010-02-14 04:11:51 +08:00
struct B : A {
virtual R3 *f();
};
R3 *B::f() { return 0; }
Handle virtual bases in return adjustment types. llvm-svn: 96119
2010-02-14 05:07:32 +08:00
// Test virtual result adjustments.
struct V1 { int v1; };
struct V2 : virtual V1 { int v1; };
struct C {
virtual V1 *f();
};
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-9: Vtable for 'Test4::D' (4 entries).
// CHECK-9-NEXT: 0 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-9-NEXT: 1 | Test4::D RTTI
// CHECK-9-NEXT: -- (Test4::C, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-9-NEXT: -- (Test4::D, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-9-NEXT: 2 | Test4::V2 *Test4::D::f()
// CHECK-9-NEXT: [return adjustment: 0 non-virtual, -24 vbase offset offset]
// CHECK-9-NEXT: 3 | Test4::V2 *Test4::D::f()
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-9: VTable indices for 'Test4::D' (1 entries).
// CHECK-9-NEXT: 1 | Test4::V2 *Test4::D::f()
Handle virtual bases in return adjustment types. llvm-svn: 96119
2010-02-14 05:07:32 +08:00
struct D : C {
virtual V2 *f();
};
V2 *D::f() { return 0; };
// Virtual result adjustments with an additional non-virtual adjustment.
struct V3 : virtual R3 { int r3; };
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-10: Vtable for 'Test4::E' (4 entries).
// CHECK-10-NEXT: 0 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-10-NEXT: 1 | Test4::E RTTI
// CHECK-10-NEXT: -- (Test4::A, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-10-NEXT: -- (Test4::E, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-10-NEXT: 2 | Test4::V3 *Test4::E::f()
// CHECK-10-NEXT: [return adjustment: 4 non-virtual, -24 vbase offset offset]
// CHECK-10-NEXT: 3 | Test4::V3 *Test4::E::f()
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-10: VTable indices for 'Test4::E' (1 entries).
// CHECK-10-NEXT: 1 | Test4::V3 *Test4::E::f()
Handle virtual bases in return adjustment types. llvm-svn: 96119
2010-02-14 05:07:32 +08:00
struct E : A {
virtual V3 *f();
};
V3 *E::f() { return 0;}
Don't make return adjustments for pure virtual member functions. llvm-svn: 96120
2010-02-14 05:16:54 +08:00
// Test that a pure virtual member doesn't get a thunk.
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-11: Vtable for 'Test4::F' (5 entries).
// CHECK-11-NEXT: 0 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-11-NEXT: 1 | Test4::F RTTI
// CHECK-11-NEXT: -- (Test4::A, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-11-NEXT: -- (Test4::F, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-11-NEXT: 2 | Test4::R3 *Test4::F::f() [pure]
// CHECK-11-NEXT: 3 | void Test4::F::g()
// CHECK-11-NEXT: 4 | Test4::R3 *Test4::F::f() [pure]
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-11: VTable indices for 'Test4::F' (2 entries).
// CHECK-11-NEXT: 1 | void Test4::F::g()
// CHECK-11-NEXT: 2 | Test4::R3 *Test4::F::f()
Don't make return adjustments for pure virtual member functions. llvm-svn: 96120
2010-02-14 05:16:54 +08:00
struct F : A {
virtual void g();
virtual R3 *f() = 0;
};
void F::g() { }
More work on covariant return types. We now handle non-virtual adjustments fine. llvm-svn: 96114
2010-02-14 04:11:51 +08:00
}
Start laying out secondary vtables. llvm-svn: 96123
2010-02-14 06:05:23 +08:00
namespace Test5 {
Add basic support for simple non-virtual 'this' pointer adjustments. llvm-svn: 96136
2010-02-14 07:40:17 +08:00
// Simple secondary vtables without 'this' pointer adjustments.
Start laying out secondary vtables. llvm-svn: 96123
2010-02-14 06:05:23 +08:00
struct A {
virtual void f();
virtual void g();
int a;
};
struct B1 : A {
virtual void f();
int b1;
};
struct B2 : A {
virtual void g();
int b2;
};
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-12: Vtable for 'Test5::C' (9 entries).
// CHECK-12-NEXT: 0 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-12-NEXT: 1 | Test5::C RTTI
// CHECK-12-NEXT: -- (Test5::A, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-12-NEXT: -- (Test5::B1, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-12-NEXT: -- (Test5::C, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-12-NEXT: 2 | void Test5::B1::f()
// CHECK-12-NEXT: 3 | void Test5::A::g()
// CHECK-12-NEXT: 4 | void Test5::C::h()
// CHECK-12-NEXT: 5 | offset_to_top (-16)
// CHECK-12-NEXT: 6 | Test5::C RTTI
// CHECK-12-NEXT: -- (Test5::A, 16) vtable address --
// CHECK-12-NEXT: -- (Test5::B2, 16) vtable address --
// CHECK-12-NEXT: 7 | void Test5::A::f()
// CHECK-12-NEXT: 8 | void Test5::B2::g()
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-12: VTable indices for 'Test5::C' (1 entries).
// CHECK-12-NEXT: 2 | void Test5::C::h()
Start laying out secondary vtables. llvm-svn: 96123
2010-02-14 06:05:23 +08:00
struct C : B1, B2 {
virtual void h();
};
void C::h() { }
}
Add basic support for simple non-virtual 'this' pointer adjustments. llvm-svn: 96136
2010-02-14 07:40:17 +08:00
namespace Test6 {
Fix a bug causing an assertion when a covariant return type differed from an overriden type only by reduced qualification. llvm-svn: 95968
2010-02-12 14:15:07 +08:00
Add basic support for simple non-virtual 'this' pointer adjustments. llvm-svn: 96136
2010-02-14 07:40:17 +08:00
// Simple non-virtual 'this' pointer adjustments.
struct A1 {
virtual void f();
int a;
};
Fix a bug causing an assertion when a covariant return type differed from an overriden type only by reduced qualification. llvm-svn: 95968
2010-02-12 14:15:07 +08:00
Add basic support for simple non-virtual 'this' pointer adjustments. llvm-svn: 96136
2010-02-14 07:40:17 +08:00
struct A2 {
virtual void f();
int a;
};
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-13: Vtable for 'Test6::C' (6 entries).
// CHECK-13-NEXT: 0 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-13-NEXT: 1 | Test6::C RTTI
// CHECK-13-NEXT: -- (Test6::A1, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-13-NEXT: -- (Test6::C, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-13-NEXT: 2 | void Test6::C::f()
// CHECK-13-NEXT: 3 | offset_to_top (-16)
// CHECK-13-NEXT: 4 | Test6::C RTTI
// CHECK-13-NEXT: -- (Test6::A2, 16) vtable address --
// CHECK-13-NEXT: 5 | void Test6::C::f()
// CHECK-13-NEXT: [this adjustment: -16 non-virtual]
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-13: VTable indices for 'Test6::C' (1 entries).
// CHECK-13-NEXT: 0 | void Test6::C::f()
Add basic support for simple non-virtual 'this' pointer adjustments. llvm-svn: 96136
2010-02-14 07:40:17 +08:00
struct C : A1, A2 {
virtual void f();
};
void C::f() { }
Improve support for non-virtual 'this' pointer adjustments. With this, it should be possible to use the new vtable layout code for all class hierarchies that do not involve virtual bases. llvm-svn: 96137
2010-02-14 08:16:19 +08:00
}
namespace Test7 {
// Test that the D::f overrider for A::f have different 'this' pointer
// adjustments in the two A base subobjects.
struct A {
virtual void f();
int a;
};
struct B1 : A { };
struct B2 : A { };
struct C { virtual void c(); };
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-14: Vtable for 'Test7::D' (10 entries).
// CHECK-14-NEXT: 0 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-14-NEXT: 1 | Test7::D RTTI
// CHECK-14-NEXT: -- (Test7::C, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-14-NEXT: -- (Test7::D, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-14-NEXT: 2 | void Test7::C::c()
// CHECK-14-NEXT: 3 | void Test7::D::f()
// CHECK-14-NEXT: 4 | offset_to_top (-8)
// CHECK-14-NEXT: 5 | Test7::D RTTI
// CHECK-14-NEXT: -- (Test7::A, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-14-NEXT: -- (Test7::B1, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-14-NEXT: 6 | void Test7::D::f()
// CHECK-14-NEXT: [this adjustment: -8 non-virtual]
// CHECK-14-NEXT: 7 | offset_to_top (-24)
// CHECK-14-NEXT: 8 | Test7::D RTTI
// CHECK-14-NEXT: -- (Test7::A, 24) vtable address --
// CHECK-14-NEXT: -- (Test7::B2, 24) vtable address --
// CHECK-14-NEXT: 9 | void Test7::D::f()
// CHECK-14-NEXT: [this adjustment: -24 non-virtual]
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-14: VTable indices for 'Test7::D' (1 entries).
// CHECK-14-NEXT: 1 | void Test7::D::f()
Improve support for non-virtual 'this' pointer adjustments. With this, it should be possible to use the new vtable layout code for all class hierarchies that do not involve virtual bases. llvm-svn: 96137
2010-02-14 08:16:19 +08:00
struct D : C, B1, B2 {
virtual void f();
};
void D::f() { }
}
Don't compute final overriders or build vtables for bases that don't need a vtable. llvm-svn: 96171
2010-02-15 01:05:59 +08:00
namespace Test8 {
// Test that we don't try to layout vtables for classes that don't have
// virtual bases or virtual member functions.
struct A { };
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-15: Vtable for 'Test8::B' (3 entries).
// CHECK-15-NEXT: 0 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-15-NEXT: 1 | Test8::B RTTI
// CHECK-15-NEXT: -- (Test8::B, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-15-NEXT: 2 | void Test8::B::f()
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-15: VTable indices for 'Test8::B' (1 entries).
// CHECK-15-NEXT: 0 | void Test8::B::f()
struct B : A {
Don't compute final overriders or build vtables for bases that don't need a vtable. llvm-svn: 96171
2010-02-15 01:05:59 +08:00
virtual void f();
};
void B::f() { }
}
Emit vbase offsets. llvm-svn: 96329
2010-02-16 12:59:55 +08:00
namespace Test9 {
// Simple test of vbase offsets.
struct A1 { int a1; };
struct A2 { int a2; };
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-16: Vtable for 'Test9::B' (5 entries).
// CHECK-16-NEXT: 0 | vbase_offset (16)
// CHECK-16-NEXT: 1 | vbase_offset (12)
// CHECK-16-NEXT: 2 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-16-NEXT: 3 | Test9::B RTTI
// CHECK-16-NEXT: -- (Test9::B, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-16-NEXT: 4 | void Test9::B::f()
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-16: VTable indices for 'Test9::B' (1 entries).
// CHECK-16-NEXT: 0 | void Test9::B::f()
Emit vbase offsets. llvm-svn: 96329
2010-02-16 12:59:55 +08:00
struct B : virtual A1, virtual A2 {
int b;
virtual void f();
};
void B::f() { }
}
Fix a bug where we would not emit secondary vtables for bases of a primary base. llvm-svn: 96351
2010-02-17 00:02:57 +08:00
namespace Test10 {
// Test for a bug where we would not emit secondary vtables for bases
// of a primary base.
struct A1 { virtual void a1(); };
struct A2 { virtual void a2(); };
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-17: Vtable for 'Test10::C' (7 entries).
// CHECK-17-NEXT: 0 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-17-NEXT: 1 | Test10::C RTTI
// CHECK-17-NEXT: -- (Test10::A1, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-17-NEXT: -- (Test10::B, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-17-NEXT: -- (Test10::C, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-17-NEXT: 2 | void Test10::A1::a1()
// CHECK-17-NEXT: 3 | void Test10::C::f()
// CHECK-17-NEXT: 4 | offset_to_top (-8)
// CHECK-17-NEXT: 5 | Test10::C RTTI
// CHECK-17-NEXT: -- (Test10::A2, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-17-NEXT: 6 | void Test10::A2::a2()
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-17: VTable indices for 'Test10::C' (1 entries).
// CHECK-17-NEXT: 1 | void Test10::C::f()
Fix a bug where we would not emit secondary vtables for bases of a primary base. llvm-svn: 96351
2010-02-17 00:02:57 +08:00
struct B : A1, A2 {
int b;
};
struct C : B {
virtual void f();
};
void C::f() { }
}
Handle layout of vtables for virtual bases. llvm-svn: 96355
2010-02-17 00:49:35 +08:00
namespace Test11 {
// Very simple test of vtables for virtual bases.
struct A1 { int a; };
struct A2 { int b; };
struct B : A1, virtual A2 {
int b;
};
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-18: Vtable for 'Test11::C' (8 entries).
// CHECK-18-NEXT: 0 | vbase_offset (24)
// CHECK-18-NEXT: 1 | vbase_offset (8)
// CHECK-18-NEXT: 2 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-18-NEXT: 3 | Test11::C RTTI
// CHECK-18-NEXT: -- (Test11::C, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-18-NEXT: 4 | void Test11::C::f()
// CHECK-18-NEXT: 5 | vbase_offset (16)
// CHECK-18-NEXT: 6 | offset_to_top (-8)
// CHECK-18-NEXT: 7 | Test11::C RTTI
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-18: VTable indices for 'Test11::C' (1 entries).
// CHECK-18-NEXT: 0 | void Test11::C::f()
Handle layout of vtables for virtual bases. llvm-svn: 96355
2010-02-17 00:49:35 +08:00
struct C : virtual B {
virtual void f();
};
void C::f() { }
}
Always emit vcall offset for the primary base, not only if it's virtual. Remove a debug printf, and add the test case that now passes. llvm-svn: 96880
2010-02-23 11:26:17 +08:00
namespace Test12 {
// Test that the right vcall offsets are generated in the right order.
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-19: Vtable for 'Test12::B' (19 entries).
// CHECK-19-NEXT: 0 | vbase_offset (8)
// CHECK-19-NEXT: 1 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-19-NEXT: 2 | Test12::B RTTI
// CHECK-19-NEXT: -- (Test12::B, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-19-NEXT: 3 | void Test12::B::f()
// CHECK-19-NEXT: 4 | void Test12::B::a()
// CHECK-19-NEXT: 5 | vcall_offset (32)
// CHECK-19-NEXT: 6 | vcall_offset (16)
// CHECK-19-NEXT: 7 | vcall_offset (-8)
// CHECK-19-NEXT: 8 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-19-NEXT: 9 | offset_to_top (-8)
// CHECK-19-NEXT: 10 | Test12::B RTTI
// CHECK-19-NEXT: -- (Test12::A, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-19-NEXT: -- (Test12::A1, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-19-NEXT: 11 | void Test12::A1::a1()
// CHECK-19-NEXT: 12 | void Test12::B::a()
// CHECK-19-NEXT: [this adjustment: 0 non-virtual, -32 vcall offset offset]
// CHECK-19-NEXT: 13 | offset_to_top (-24)
// CHECK-19-NEXT: 14 | Test12::B RTTI
// CHECK-19-NEXT: -- (Test12::A2, 24) vtable address --
// CHECK-19-NEXT: 15 | void Test12::A2::a2()
// CHECK-19-NEXT: 16 | offset_to_top (-40)
// CHECK-19-NEXT: 17 | Test12::B RTTI
// CHECK-19-NEXT: -- (Test12::A3, 40) vtable address --
// CHECK-19-NEXT: 18 | void Test12::A3::a3()
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-19: VTable indices for 'Test12::B' (2 entries).
// CHECK-19-NEXT: 0 | void Test12::B::f()
// CHECK-19-NEXT: 1 | void Test12::B::a()
Always emit vcall offset for the primary base, not only if it's virtual. Remove a debug printf, and add the test case that now passes. llvm-svn: 96880
2010-02-23 11:26:17 +08:00
struct A1 {
virtual void a1();
int a;
};
struct A2 {
virtual void a2();
int a;
};
struct A3 {
virtual void a3();
int a;
};
struct A : A1, A2, A3 {
virtual void a();
int i;
};
struct B : virtual A {
virtual void f();
virtual void a();
};
void B::f() { }
}
More fixes. Don't try to emit a virtual base vtable if the virtual base in question is a primary virtual base of some other base. llvm-svn: 96881
2010-02-23 11:48:14 +08:00
namespace Test13 {
// Test that we don't try to emit a vtable for 'A' twice.
struct A {
virtual void f();
};
struct B : virtual A {
virtual void f();
};
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-20: Vtable for 'Test13::C' (6 entries).
// CHECK-20-NEXT: 0 | vbase_offset (0)
// CHECK-20-NEXT: 1 | vbase_offset (0)
// CHECK-20-NEXT: 2 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-20-NEXT: 3 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-20-NEXT: 4 | Test13::C RTTI
// CHECK-20-NEXT: -- (Test13::A, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-20-NEXT: -- (Test13::B, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-20-NEXT: -- (Test13::C, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-20-NEXT: 5 | void Test13::C::f()
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-20: VTable indices for 'Test13::C' (1 entries).
// CHECK-20-NEXT: 0 | void Test13::C::f()
More fixes. Don't try to emit a virtual base vtable if the virtual base in question is a primary virtual base of some other base. llvm-svn: 96881
2010-02-23 11:48:14 +08:00
struct C : virtual B, virtual A {
virtual void f();
};
void C::f() { }
}
Fux a bug where we were trying to add overriders for non-virtual bases of virtual bases more than once. llvm-svn: 97173
2010-02-26 06:18:35 +08:00
namespace Test14 {
// Verify that we handle A being a non-virtual base of B, which is a virtual base.
struct A {
virtual void f();
};
struct B : A { };
struct C : virtual B { };
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-21: Vtable for 'Test14::D' (5 entries).
// CHECK-21-NEXT: 0 | vbase_offset (0)
// CHECK-21-NEXT: 1 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-21-NEXT: 2 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-21-NEXT: 3 | Test14::D RTTI
// CHECK-21-NEXT: -- (Test14::A, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-21-NEXT: -- (Test14::B, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-21-NEXT: -- (Test14::C, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-21-NEXT: -- (Test14::D, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-21-NEXT: 4 | void Test14::D::f()
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-21: VTable indices for 'Test14::D' (1 entries).
// CHECK-21-NEXT: 0 | void Test14::D::f()
Fux a bug where we were trying to add overriders for non-virtual bases of virtual bases more than once. llvm-svn: 97173
2010-02-26 06:18:35 +08:00
struct D : C, virtual B {
virtual void f();
};
void D::f() { }
}
Fix a bug where we were generating an unnecessary vtable for a virtual base that's already a primary virtual base. llvm-svn: 97303
2010-02-27 12:05:52 +08:00
namespace Test15 {
// Test that we don't emit an extra vtable for B since it's a primary base of C.
struct A { virtual void a(); };
struct B { virtual void b(); };
struct C : virtual B { };
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-22: Vtable for 'Test15::D' (11 entries).
// CHECK-22-NEXT: 0 | vbase_offset (8)
// CHECK-22-NEXT: 1 | vbase_offset (8)
// CHECK-22-NEXT: 2 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-22-NEXT: 3 | Test15::D RTTI
// CHECK-22-NEXT: -- (Test15::A, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-22-NEXT: -- (Test15::D, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-22-NEXT: 4 | void Test15::A::a()
// CHECK-22-NEXT: 5 | void Test15::D::f()
// CHECK-22-NEXT: 6 | vbase_offset (0)
// CHECK-22-NEXT: 7 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-22-NEXT: 8 | offset_to_top (-8)
// CHECK-22-NEXT: 9 | Test15::D RTTI
// CHECK-22-NEXT: -- (Test15::B, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-22-NEXT: -- (Test15::C, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-22-NEXT: 10 | void Test15::B::b()
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-22: VTable indices for 'Test15::D' (1 entries).
// CHECK-22-NEXT: 1 | void Test15::D::f()
Fix a bug where we were generating an unnecessary vtable for a virtual base that's already a primary virtual base. llvm-svn: 97303
2010-02-27 12:05:52 +08:00
struct D : A, virtual B, virtual C {
virtual void f();
};
void D::f() { }
}
Handle vcall offset sharing between destructors. llvm-svn: 97304
2010-02-27 12:12:52 +08:00
namespace Test16 {
// Test that destructors share vcall offsets.
struct A { virtual ~A(); };
struct B { virtual ~B(); };
struct C : A, B { virtual ~C(); };
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-23: Vtable for 'Test16::D' (15 entries).
// CHECK-23-NEXT: 0 | vbase_offset (8)
// CHECK-23-NEXT: 1 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-23-NEXT: 2 | Test16::D RTTI
// CHECK-23-NEXT: -- (Test16::D, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-23-NEXT: 3 | void Test16::D::f()
// CHECK-23-NEXT: 4 | Test16::D::~D() [complete]
// CHECK-23-NEXT: 5 | Test16::D::~D() [deleting]
// CHECK-23-NEXT: 6 | vcall_offset (-8)
// CHECK-23-NEXT: 7 | offset_to_top (-8)
// CHECK-23-NEXT: 8 | Test16::D RTTI
// CHECK-23-NEXT: -- (Test16::A, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-23-NEXT: -- (Test16::C, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-23-NEXT: 9 | Test16::D::~D() [complete]
// CHECK-23-NEXT: [this adjustment: 0 non-virtual, -24 vcall offset offset]
// CHECK-23-NEXT: 10 | Test16::D::~D() [deleting]
// CHECK-23-NEXT: [this adjustment: 0 non-virtual, -24 vcall offset offset]
// CHECK-23-NEXT: 11 | offset_to_top (-16)
// CHECK-23-NEXT: 12 | Test16::D RTTI
// CHECK-23-NEXT: -- (Test16::B, 16) vtable address --
// CHECK-23-NEXT: 13 | Test16::D::~D() [complete]
// CHECK-23-NEXT: [this adjustment: -8 non-virtual, -24 vcall offset offset]
// CHECK-23-NEXT: 14 | Test16::D::~D() [deleting]
// CHECK-23-NEXT: [this adjustment: -8 non-virtual, -24 vcall offset offset]
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-23: VTable indices for 'Test16::D' (3 entries).
// CHECK-23-NEXT: 0 | void Test16::D::f()
// CHECK-23-NEXT: 1 | Test16::D::~D() [complete]
// CHECK-23-NEXT: 2 | Test16::D::~D() [deleting]
Handle vcall offset sharing between destructors. llvm-svn: 97304
2010-02-27 12:12:52 +08:00
struct D : virtual C {
virtual void f();
};
void D::f() { }
}
Fix another vtable layout bug; we weren't looking hard enough for overriden functions when determining if an overrider will ever be used. llvm-svn: 97306
2010-02-27 14:38:03 +08:00
namespace Test17 {
// Test that we don't mark E::f in the C-in-E vtable as unused.
struct A { virtual void f(); };
struct B : virtual A { virtual void f(); };
struct C : virtual A { virtual void f(); };
struct D : virtual B, virtual C { virtual void f(); };
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-24: Vtable for 'Test17::E' (13 entries).
// CHECK-24-NEXT: 0 | vbase_offset (0)
// CHECK-24-NEXT: 1 | vbase_offset (8)
// CHECK-24-NEXT: 2 | vbase_offset (0)
// CHECK-24-NEXT: 3 | vbase_offset (0)
// CHECK-24-NEXT: 4 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-24-NEXT: 5 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-24-NEXT: 6 | Test17::E RTTI
// CHECK-24-NEXT: -- (Test17::A, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-24-NEXT: -- (Test17::B, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-24-NEXT: -- (Test17::D, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-24-NEXT: -- (Test17::E, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-24-NEXT: 7 | void Test17::E::f()
// CHECK-24-NEXT: 8 | vbase_offset (-8)
// CHECK-24-NEXT: 9 | vcall_offset (-8)
// CHECK-24-NEXT: 10 | offset_to_top (-8)
// CHECK-24-NEXT: 11 | Test17::E RTTI
// CHECK-24-NEXT: -- (Test17::C, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-24-NEXT: 12 | void Test17::E::f()
// CHECK-24-NEXT: [this adjustment: 0 non-virtual, -24 vcall offset offset]
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-24: VTable indices for 'Test17::E' (1 entries).
// CHECK-24-NEXT: 0 | void Test17::E::f()
Fix another vtable layout bug; we weren't looking hard enough for overriden functions when determining if an overrider will ever be used. llvm-svn: 97306
2010-02-27 14:38:03 +08:00
class E : virtual D {
virtual void f();
};
void E::f() {}
}
Finish up the changes to this adjustments. llvm-svn: 97328
2010-02-28 00:52:49 +08:00
namespace Test18 {
// Test that we compute the right 'this' adjustment offsets.
struct A {
virtual void f();
virtual void g();
};
struct B : virtual A {
virtual void f();
};
struct C : A, B {
virtual void g();
};
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-25: Vtable for 'Test18::D' (24 entries).
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 0 | vbase_offset (8)
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 1 | vbase_offset (0)
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 2 | vbase_offset (0)
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 3 | vcall_offset (8)
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 4 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 5 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 6 | Test18::D RTTI
// CHECK-25-NEXT: -- (Test18::A, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-25-NEXT: -- (Test18::B, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-25-NEXT: -- (Test18::D, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 7 | void Test18::D::f()
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 8 | void Test18::C::g()
// CHECK-25-NEXT: [this adjustment: 0 non-virtual, -32 vcall offset offset]
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 9 | void Test18::D::h()
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 10 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 11 | vcall_offset (-8)
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 12 | vbase_offset (-8)
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 13 | offset_to_top (-8)
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 14 | Test18::D RTTI
// CHECK-25-NEXT: -- (Test18::A, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-25-NEXT: -- (Test18::C, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 15 | void Test18::D::f()
// CHECK-25-NEXT: [this adjustment: 0 non-virtual, -32 vcall offset offset]
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 16 | void Test18::C::g()
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 17 | vbase_offset (-16)
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 18 | vcall_offset (-8)
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 19 | vcall_offset (-16)
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 20 | offset_to_top (-16)
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 21 | Test18::D RTTI
// CHECK-25-NEXT: -- (Test18::B, 16) vtable address --
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 22 | void Test18::D::f()
// CHECK-25-NEXT: [this adjustment: -8 non-virtual, -32 vcall offset offset]
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 23 | [unused] void Test18::C::g()
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-25: VTable indices for 'Test18::D' (2 entries).
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 0 | void Test18::D::f()
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 2 | void Test18::D::h()
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-25: Construction vtable for ('Test18::B', 0) in 'Test18::D' (7 entries).
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 0 | vbase_offset (0)
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 1 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 2 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 3 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 4 | Test18::B RTTI
// CHECK-25-NEXT: -- (Test18::A, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-25-NEXT: -- (Test18::B, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 5 | void Test18::B::f()
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 6 | void Test18::A::g()
// CHECK-25: Construction vtable for ('Test18::C', 8) in 'Test18::D' (20 entries).
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 0 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 1 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 2 | vbase_offset (-8)
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 3 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 4 | Test18::C RTTI
// CHECK-25-NEXT: -- (Test18::A, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-25-NEXT: -- (Test18::C, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 5 | void Test18::A::f()
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 6 | void Test18::C::g()
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 7 | vbase_offset (-16)
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 8 | vcall_offset (-8)
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 9 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 10 | offset_to_top (-8)
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 11 | Test18::C RTTI
// CHECK-25-NEXT: -- (Test18::B, 16) vtable address --
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 12 | void Test18::B::f()
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 13 | [unused] void Test18::C::g()
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 14 | vcall_offset (8)
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 15 | vcall_offset (16)
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 16 | offset_to_top (8)
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 17 | Test18::C RTTI
// CHECK-25-NEXT: -- (Test18::A, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 18 | void Test18::B::f()
// CHECK-25-NEXT: [this adjustment: 0 non-virtual, -24 vcall offset offset]
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 19 | void Test18::C::g()
// CHECK-25-NEXT: [this adjustment: 0 non-virtual, -32 vcall offset offset]
// CHECK-25: Construction vtable for ('Test18::B', 16) in 'Test18::D' (13 entries).
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 0 | vbase_offset (-16)
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 1 | vcall_offset (-16)
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 2 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 3 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 4 | Test18::B RTTI
// CHECK-25-NEXT: -- (Test18::B, 16) vtable address --
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 5 | void Test18::B::f()
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 6 | [unused] void Test18::A::g()
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 7 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 8 | vcall_offset (16)
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 9 | offset_to_top (16)
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 10 | Test18::B RTTI
// CHECK-25-NEXT: -- (Test18::A, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 11 | void Test18::B::f()
// CHECK-25-NEXT: [this adjustment: 0 non-virtual, -24 vcall offset offset]
// CHECK-25-NEXT: 12 | void Test18::A::g()
Finish up the changes to this adjustments. llvm-svn: 97328
2010-02-28 00:52:49 +08:00
struct D : virtual B, virtual C, virtual A
{
virtual void f();
virtual void h();
};
void D::f() {}
Add another test. llvm-svn: 97329
2010-02-28 00:55:58 +08:00
}
namespace Test19 {
// Another 'this' adjustment test.
struct A {
int a;
virtual void f();
};
struct B : A {
int b;
virtual void g();
};
struct C {
virtual void c();
};
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-26: Vtable for 'Test19::D' (13 entries).
// CHECK-26-NEXT: 0 | vbase_offset (24)
// CHECK-26-NEXT: 1 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-26-NEXT: 2 | Test19::D RTTI
// CHECK-26-NEXT: -- (Test19::C, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-26-NEXT: -- (Test19::D, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-26-NEXT: 3 | void Test19::C::c()
// CHECK-26-NEXT: 4 | void Test19::D::f()
// CHECK-26-NEXT: 5 | offset_to_top (-8)
// CHECK-26-NEXT: 6 | Test19::D RTTI
// CHECK-26-NEXT: -- (Test19::A, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-26-NEXT: -- (Test19::B, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-26-NEXT: 7 | void Test19::D::f()
// CHECK-26-NEXT: [this adjustment: -8 non-virtual]
// CHECK-26-NEXT: 8 | void Test19::B::g()
// CHECK-26-NEXT: 9 | vcall_offset (-24)
// CHECK-26-NEXT: 10 | offset_to_top (-24)
// CHECK-26-NEXT: 11 | Test19::D RTTI
// CHECK-26-NEXT: -- (Test19::A, 24) vtable address --
// CHECK-26-NEXT: 12 | void Test19::D::f()
// CHECK-26-NEXT: [this adjustment: 0 non-virtual, -24 vcall offset offset]
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-26: VTable indices for 'Test19::D' (1 entries).
// CHECK-26-NEXT: 1 | void Test19::D::f()
Add another test. llvm-svn: 97329
2010-02-28 00:55:58 +08:00
struct D : C, B, virtual A {
virtual void f();
};
void D::f() { }
Don't add this adjustments for pure virtual member functions. llvm-svn: 97334
2010-02-28 02:16:50 +08:00
}
namespace Test20 {
// pure virtual member functions should never have 'this' adjustments.
struct A {
virtual void f() = 0;
virtual void g();
};
struct B : A { };
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-27: Vtable for 'Test20::C' (9 entries).
// CHECK-27-NEXT: 0 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-27-NEXT: 1 | Test20::C RTTI
// CHECK-27-NEXT: -- (Test20::A, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-27-NEXT: -- (Test20::C, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-27-NEXT: 2 | void Test20::C::f() [pure]
// CHECK-27-NEXT: 3 | void Test20::A::g()
// CHECK-27-NEXT: 4 | void Test20::C::h()
// CHECK-27-NEXT: 5 | offset_to_top (-8)
// CHECK-27-NEXT: 6 | Test20::C RTTI
// CHECK-27-NEXT: -- (Test20::A, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-27-NEXT: -- (Test20::B, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-27-NEXT: 7 | void Test20::C::f() [pure]
// CHECK-27-NEXT: 8 | void Test20::A::g()
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-27: VTable indices for 'Test20::C' (2 entries).
// CHECK-27-NEXT: 0 | void Test20::C::f()
// CHECK-27-NEXT: 2 | void Test20::C::h()
struct C : A, B {
Don't add this adjustments for pure virtual member functions. llvm-svn: 97334
2010-02-28 02:16:50 +08:00
virtual void f() = 0;
virtual void h();
};
void C::h() { }
}
Use the real base offset when calculating vbase offsets. llvm-svn: 97338
2010-02-28 03:21:58 +08:00
namespace Test21 {
// Test that we get vbase offsets right in secondary vtables.
struct A {
virtual void f();
};
struct B : virtual A { };
class C : virtual B { };
class D : virtual C { };
class E : virtual C { };
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-28: Vtable for 'Test21::F' (16 entries).
// CHECK-28-NEXT: 0 | vbase_offset (8)
// CHECK-28-NEXT: 1 | vbase_offset (0)
// CHECK-28-NEXT: 2 | vbase_offset (0)
// CHECK-28-NEXT: 3 | vbase_offset (0)
// CHECK-28-NEXT: 4 | vbase_offset (0)
// CHECK-28-NEXT: 5 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-28-NEXT: 6 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-28-NEXT: 7 | Test21::F RTTI
// CHECK-28-NEXT: -- (Test21::A, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-28-NEXT: -- (Test21::B, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-28-NEXT: -- (Test21::C, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-28-NEXT: -- (Test21::D, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-28-NEXT: -- (Test21::F, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-28-NEXT: 8 | void Test21::F::f()
// CHECK-28-NEXT: 9 | vbase_offset (-8)
// CHECK-28-NEXT: 10 | vbase_offset (-8)
// CHECK-28-NEXT: 11 | vbase_offset (-8)
// CHECK-28-NEXT: 12 | vcall_offset (-8)
// CHECK-28-NEXT: 13 | offset_to_top (-8)
// CHECK-28-NEXT: 14 | Test21::F RTTI
// CHECK-28-NEXT: -- (Test21::E, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-28-NEXT: 15 | [unused] void Test21::F::f()
Add a test. llvm-svn: 98246
2010-03-11 14:44:31 +08:00
//
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-28: Virtual base offset offsets for 'Test21::F' (5 entries).
// CHECK-28-NEXT: Test21::A | -32
// CHECK-28-NEXT: Test21::B | -40
// CHECK-28-NEXT: Test21::C | -48
// CHECK-28-NEXT: Test21::D | -56
// CHECK-28-NEXT: Test21::E | -64
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-28: VTable indices for 'Test21::F' (1 entries).
// CHECK-28-NEXT: 0 | void Test21::F::f()
Use the real base offset when calculating vbase offsets. llvm-svn: 97338
2010-02-28 03:21:58 +08:00
class F : virtual D, virtual E {
virtual void f();
};
void F::f() { }
}
Add a simple construction vtable test. llvm-svn: 97344
2010-02-28 05:09:00 +08:00
namespace Test22 {
// Very simple construction vtable test.
struct V1 {
int v1;
};
struct V2 : virtual V1 {
int v2;
};
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-29: Vtable for 'Test22::C' (8 entries).
// CHECK-29-NEXT: 0 | vbase_offset (16)
// CHECK-29-NEXT: 1 | vbase_offset (12)
// CHECK-29-NEXT: 2 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-29-NEXT: 3 | Test22::C RTTI
// CHECK-29-NEXT: -- (Test22::C, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-29-NEXT: 4 | void Test22::C::f()
// CHECK-29-NEXT: 5 | vbase_offset (-4)
// CHECK-29-NEXT: 6 | offset_to_top (-16)
// CHECK-29-NEXT: 7 | Test22::C RTTI
// CHECK-29-NEXT: -- (Test22::V2, 16) vtable address --
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-29: VTable indices for 'Test22::C' (1 entries).
// CHECK-29-NEXT: 0 | void Test22::C::f()
Add a simple construction vtable test. llvm-svn: 97344
2010-02-28 05:09:00 +08:00
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-29: Construction vtable for ('Test22::V2', 16) in 'Test22::C' (3 entries).
// CHECK-29-NEXT: 0 | vbase_offset (-4)
// CHECK-29-NEXT: 1 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-29-NEXT: 2 | Test22::V2 RTTI
Add a simple construction vtable test. llvm-svn: 97344
2010-02-28 05:09:00 +08:00
struct C : virtual V1, virtual V2 {
int c;
virtual void f();
};
void C::f() { }
}
More improvements to construction vtables; we know handle vbase offsets correctly (I hope). llvm-svn: 97361
2010-02-28 09:43:58 +08:00
namespace Test23 {
struct A {
int a;
};
struct B : virtual A {
int b;
};
struct C : A, virtual B {
int c;
};
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-30: Vtable for 'Test23::D' (7 entries).
// CHECK-30-NEXT: 0 | vbase_offset (20)
// CHECK-30-NEXT: 1 | vbase_offset (24)
// CHECK-30-NEXT: 2 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-30-NEXT: 3 | Test23::D RTTI
// CHECK-30-NEXT: -- (Test23::C, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-30-NEXT: -- (Test23::D, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-30-NEXT: 4 | vbase_offset (-4)
// CHECK-30-NEXT: 5 | offset_to_top (-24)
// CHECK-30-NEXT: 6 | Test23::D RTTI
// CHECK-30-NEXT: -- (Test23::B, 24) vtable address --
// CHECK-30: Construction vtable for ('Test23::C', 0) in 'Test23::D' (7 entries).
// CHECK-30-NEXT: 0 | vbase_offset (20)
// CHECK-30-NEXT: 1 | vbase_offset (24)
// CHECK-30-NEXT: 2 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-30-NEXT: 3 | Test23::C RTTI
// CHECK-30-NEXT: -- (Test23::C, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-30-NEXT: 4 | vbase_offset (-4)
// CHECK-30-NEXT: 5 | offset_to_top (-24)
// CHECK-30-NEXT: 6 | Test23::C RTTI
// CHECK-30-NEXT: -- (Test23::B, 24) vtable address --
// CHECK-30: Construction vtable for ('Test23::B', 24) in 'Test23::D' (3 entries).
// CHECK-30-NEXT: 0 | vbase_offset (-4)
// CHECK-30-NEXT: 1 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-30-NEXT: 2 | Test23::B RTTI
// CHECK-30-NEXT: -- (Test23::B, 24) vtable address --
More improvements to construction vtables; we know handle vbase offsets correctly (I hope). llvm-svn: 97361
2010-02-28 09:43:58 +08:00
struct D : virtual A, virtual B, C {
int d;
void f();
};
void D::f() { }
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
D d;
More improvements to construction vtables; we know handle vbase offsets correctly (I hope). llvm-svn: 97361
2010-02-28 09:43:58 +08:00
}
Add another construction vtable test. llvm-svn: 97401
2010-03-01 01:59:36 +08:00
namespace Test24 {
// Another construction vtable test.
When laying out vtables for virtual bases in construction vtables, we need to check if the vtable is a primary base in the layout class. llvm-svn: 97402
2010-03-01 02:08:38 +08:00
struct A {
virtual void f();
};
struct B : virtual A { };
struct C : virtual A { };
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-31: Vtable for 'Test24::D' (10 entries).
// CHECK-31-NEXT: 0 | vbase_offset (0)
// CHECK-31-NEXT: 1 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-31-NEXT: 2 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-31-NEXT: 3 | Test24::D RTTI
// CHECK-31-NEXT: -- (Test24::A, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-31-NEXT: -- (Test24::B, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-31-NEXT: -- (Test24::D, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-31-NEXT: 4 | void Test24::D::f()
// CHECK-31-NEXT: 5 | vbase_offset (-8)
// CHECK-31-NEXT: 6 | vcall_offset (-8)
// CHECK-31-NEXT: 7 | offset_to_top (-8)
// CHECK-31-NEXT: 8 | Test24::D RTTI
// CHECK-31-NEXT: -- (Test24::C, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-31-NEXT: 9 | [unused] void Test24::D::f()
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-31: VTable indices for 'Test24::D' (1 entries).
// CHECK-31-NEXT: 0 | void Test24::D::f()
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-31: Construction vtable for ('Test24::B', 0) in 'Test24::D' (5 entries).
// CHECK-31-NEXT: 0 | vbase_offset (0)
// CHECK-31-NEXT: 1 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-31-NEXT: 2 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-31-NEXT: 3 | Test24::B RTTI
// CHECK-31-NEXT: -- (Test24::A, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-31-NEXT: -- (Test24::B, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-31-NEXT: 4 | void Test24::A::f()
// CHECK-31: Construction vtable for ('Test24::C', 8) in 'Test24::D' (9 entries).
// CHECK-31-NEXT: 0 | vbase_offset (-8)
// CHECK-31-NEXT: 1 | vcall_offset (-8)
// CHECK-31-NEXT: 2 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-31-NEXT: 3 | Test24::C RTTI
// CHECK-31-NEXT: -- (Test24::C, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-31-NEXT: 4 | [unused] void Test24::A::f()
// CHECK-31-NEXT: 5 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-31-NEXT: 6 | offset_to_top (8)
// CHECK-31-NEXT: 7 | Test24::C RTTI
// CHECK-31-NEXT: -- (Test24::A, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-31-NEXT: 8 | void Test24::A::f()
Add another construction vtable test. llvm-svn: 97401
2010-03-01 01:59:36 +08:00
struct D : B, C {
virtual void f();
};
void D::f() { }
Handle unused functions in construction vtables correctly. llvm-svn: 97406
2010-03-01 02:37:33 +08:00
Add another construction vtable test. llvm-svn: 97401
2010-03-01 01:59:36 +08:00
}
Fix a bug with base offset merging that Devang noticed. llvm-svn: 97641
2010-03-03 12:58:02 +08:00
namespace Test25 {
// This mainly tests that we don't assert on this class hierarchy.
struct V {
virtual void f();
};
struct A : virtual V { };
struct B : virtual V { };
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-32: Vtable for 'Test25::C' (11 entries).
// CHECK-32-NEXT: 0 | vbase_offset (0)
// CHECK-32-NEXT: 1 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-32-NEXT: 2 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-32-NEXT: 3 | Test25::C RTTI
// CHECK-32-NEXT: -- (Test25::A, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-32-NEXT: -- (Test25::C, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-32-NEXT: -- (Test25::V, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-32-NEXT: 4 | void Test25::V::f()
// CHECK-32-NEXT: 5 | void Test25::C::g()
// CHECK-32-NEXT: 6 | vbase_offset (-8)
// CHECK-32-NEXT: 7 | vcall_offset (-8)
// CHECK-32-NEXT: 8 | offset_to_top (-8)
// CHECK-32-NEXT: 9 | Test25::C RTTI
// CHECK-32-NEXT: -- (Test25::B, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-32-NEXT: 10 | [unused] void Test25::V::f()
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-32: VTable indices for 'Test25::C' (1 entries).
// CHECK-32-NEXT: 1 | void Test25::C::g()
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-32: Construction vtable for ('Test25::A', 0) in 'Test25::C' (5 entries).
// CHECK-32-NEXT: 0 | vbase_offset (0)
// CHECK-32-NEXT: 1 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-32-NEXT: 2 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-32-NEXT: 3 | Test25::A RTTI
// CHECK-32-NEXT: -- (Test25::A, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-32-NEXT: -- (Test25::V, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-32-NEXT: 4 | void Test25::V::f()
// CHECK-32: Construction vtable for ('Test25::B', 8) in 'Test25::C' (9 entries).
// CHECK-32-NEXT: 0 | vbase_offset (-8)
// CHECK-32-NEXT: 1 | vcall_offset (-8)
// CHECK-32-NEXT: 2 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-32-NEXT: 3 | Test25::B RTTI
// CHECK-32-NEXT: -- (Test25::B, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-32-NEXT: 4 | [unused] void Test25::V::f()
// CHECK-32-NEXT: 5 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-32-NEXT: 6 | offset_to_top (8)
// CHECK-32-NEXT: 7 | Test25::B RTTI
// CHECK-32-NEXT: -- (Test25::V, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-32-NEXT: 8 | void Test25::V::f()
Fix a bug with base offset merging that Devang noticed. llvm-svn: 97641
2010-03-03 12:58:02 +08:00
struct C : A, virtual V, B {
virtual void g();
};
void C::g() { }
}
Don't accidentally mark some functions in construction vtables as unused. Also land the test for a previous checkin, now that it's correct. llvm-svn: 98139
2010-03-10 14:51:42 +08:00
namespace Test26 {
// Test that we generate the right number of entries in the C-in-D construction vtable, and that
// we don't mark A::a as unused.
struct A {
virtual void a();
};
struct B {
virtual void c();
};
struct C : virtual A {
virtual void b();
};
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-33: Vtable for 'Test26::D' (15 entries).
// CHECK-33-NEXT: 0 | vbase_offset (8)
// CHECK-33-NEXT: 1 | vbase_offset (8)
// CHECK-33-NEXT: 2 | vbase_offset (0)
// CHECK-33-NEXT: 3 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-33-NEXT: 4 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-33-NEXT: 5 | Test26::D RTTI
// CHECK-33-NEXT: -- (Test26::B, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-33-NEXT: -- (Test26::D, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-33-NEXT: 6 | void Test26::B::c()
// CHECK-33-NEXT: 7 | void Test26::D::d()
// CHECK-33-NEXT: 8 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-33-NEXT: 9 | vbase_offset (0)
// CHECK-33-NEXT: 10 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-33-NEXT: 11 | offset_to_top (-8)
// CHECK-33-NEXT: 12 | Test26::D RTTI
// CHECK-33-NEXT: -- (Test26::A, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-33-NEXT: -- (Test26::C, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-33-NEXT: 13 | void Test26::A::a()
// CHECK-33-NEXT: 14 | void Test26::C::b()
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-33: VTable indices for 'Test26::D' (1 entries).
// CHECK-33-NEXT: 1 | void Test26::D::d()
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-33: Construction vtable for ('Test26::C', 8) in 'Test26::D' (7 entries).
// CHECK-33-NEXT: 0 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-33-NEXT: 1 | vbase_offset (0)
// CHECK-33-NEXT: 2 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-33-NEXT: 3 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-33-NEXT: 4 | Test26::C RTTI
// CHECK-33-NEXT: -- (Test26::A, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-33-NEXT: -- (Test26::C, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-33-NEXT: 5 | void Test26::A::a()
// CHECK-33-NEXT: 6 | void Test26::C::b()
Don't accidentally mark some functions in construction vtables as unused. Also land the test for a previous checkin, now that it's correct. llvm-svn: 98139
2010-03-10 14:51:42 +08:00
class D : virtual B, virtual C {
virtual void d();
};
void D::d() { }
Add newline. llvm-svn: 98140
2010-03-10 14:51:56 +08:00
}
Ignore non-interesting bases when emitting construction vtables. llvm-svn: 98177
2010-03-11 03:15:26 +08:00
namespace Test27 {
// Test that we don't generate a secondary vtable for C in the D-in-E vtable, since
// C doesn't have any virtual bases.
struct A {
virtual void a();
};
struct B {
virtual void b();
};
struct C {
virtual void c();
};
struct D : A, virtual B, C {
virtual void d();
};
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-34: Vtable for 'Test27::E' (13 entries).
// CHECK-34-NEXT: 0 | vbase_offset (16)
// CHECK-34-NEXT: 1 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-34-NEXT: 2 | Test27::E RTTI
// CHECK-34-NEXT: -- (Test27::A, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-34-NEXT: -- (Test27::D, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-34-NEXT: -- (Test27::E, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-34-NEXT: 3 | void Test27::A::a()
// CHECK-34-NEXT: 4 | void Test27::D::d()
// CHECK-34-NEXT: 5 | void Test27::E::e()
// CHECK-34-NEXT: 6 | offset_to_top (-8)
// CHECK-34-NEXT: 7 | Test27::E RTTI
// CHECK-34-NEXT: -- (Test27::C, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-34-NEXT: 8 | void Test27::C::c()
// CHECK-34-NEXT: 9 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-34-NEXT: 10 | offset_to_top (-16)
// CHECK-34-NEXT: 11 | Test27::E RTTI
// CHECK-34-NEXT: -- (Test27::B, 16) vtable address --
// CHECK-34-NEXT: 12 | void Test27::B::b()
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-34: VTable indices for 'Test27::E' (1 entries).
// CHECK-34-NEXT: 2 | void Test27::E::e()
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-34: Construction vtable for ('Test27::D', 0) in 'Test27::E' (9 entries).
// CHECK-34-NEXT: 0 | vbase_offset (16)
// CHECK-34-NEXT: 1 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-34-NEXT: 2 | Test27::D RTTI
// CHECK-34-NEXT: -- (Test27::A, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-34-NEXT: -- (Test27::D, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-34-NEXT: 3 | void Test27::A::a()
// CHECK-34-NEXT: 4 | void Test27::D::d()
// CHECK-34-NEXT: 5 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-34-NEXT: 6 | offset_to_top (-16)
// CHECK-34-NEXT: 7 | Test27::D RTTI
// CHECK-34-NEXT: -- (Test27::B, 16) vtable address --
// CHECK-34-NEXT: 8 | void Test27::B::b()
Ignore non-interesting bases when emitting construction vtables. llvm-svn: 98177
2010-03-11 03:15:26 +08:00
struct E : D {
virtual void e();
};
void E::e() { }
We were mistakenly marking morally virtual bases as being uninteresting. Fix this. llvm-svn: 98180
2010-03-11 03:39:11 +08:00
}
namespace Test28 {
// Check that we do include the vtable for B in the D-in-E construction vtable, since
// B is a base class of a virtual base (C).
struct A {
virtual void a();
};
struct B {
virtual void b();
};
struct C : A, B {
virtual void c();
};
struct D : virtual C {
};
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-35: Vtable for 'Test28::E' (14 entries).
// CHECK-35-NEXT: 0 | vbase_offset (8)
// CHECK-35-NEXT: 1 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-35-NEXT: 2 | Test28::E RTTI
// CHECK-35-NEXT: -- (Test28::D, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-35-NEXT: -- (Test28::E, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-35-NEXT: 3 | void Test28::E::e()
// CHECK-35-NEXT: 4 | vcall_offset (8)
// CHECK-35-NEXT: 5 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-35-NEXT: 6 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-35-NEXT: 7 | offset_to_top (-8)
// CHECK-35-NEXT: 8 | Test28::E RTTI
// CHECK-35-NEXT: -- (Test28::A, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-35-NEXT: -- (Test28::C, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-35-NEXT: 9 | void Test28::A::a()
// CHECK-35-NEXT: 10 | void Test28::C::c()
// CHECK-35-NEXT: 11 | offset_to_top (-16)
// CHECK-35-NEXT: 12 | Test28::E RTTI
// CHECK-35-NEXT: -- (Test28::B, 16) vtable address --
// CHECK-35-NEXT: 13 | void Test28::B::b()
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-35: VTable indices for 'Test28::E' (1 entries).
Fix a few tests that were missing ':' on CHECK lines and weren't testing anything. Found by `git grep '\/\/ CHECK-[^: ]* ' clang/test/ | grep -v RUN:`. Also tweak CodeGenCXX/arm-swiftcall.cpp to still pass now that it checks more. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58061 llvm-svn: 353744
2019-02-12 04:33:22 +08:00
// CHECK-35-NEXT: 0 | void Test28::E::e()
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-35: Construction vtable for ('Test28::D', 0) in 'Test28::E' (13 entries).
// CHECK-35-NEXT: 0 | vbase_offset (8)
// CHECK-35-NEXT: 1 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-35-NEXT: 2 | Test28::D RTTI
// CHECK-35-NEXT: -- (Test28::D, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-35-NEXT: 3 | vcall_offset (8)
// CHECK-35-NEXT: 4 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-35-NEXT: 5 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-35-NEXT: 6 | offset_to_top (-8)
// CHECK-35-NEXT: 7 | Test28::D RTTI
// CHECK-35-NEXT: -- (Test28::A, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-35-NEXT: -- (Test28::C, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-35-NEXT: 8 | void Test28::A::a()
// CHECK-35-NEXT: 9 | void Test28::C::c()
// CHECK-35-NEXT: 10 | offset_to_top (-16)
// CHECK-35-NEXT: 11 | Test28::D RTTI
// CHECK-35-NEXT: -- (Test28::B, 16) vtable address --
// CHECK-35-NEXT: 12 | void Test28::B::b()
We were mistakenly marking morally virtual bases as being uninteresting. Fix this. llvm-svn: 98180
2010-03-11 03:39:11 +08:00
struct E : D {
virtual void e();
};
void E::e() { }
Ignore non-interesting bases when emitting construction vtables. llvm-svn: 98177
2010-03-11 03:15:26 +08:00
}
Another vtable layout fix, making us match gcc better. llvm-svn: 99812
2010-03-29 23:08:41 +08:00
namespace Test29 {
// Test that the covariant return thunk for B::f will have a virtual 'this' adjustment,
// matching gcc.
struct V1 { };
struct V2 : virtual V1 { };
struct A {
virtual V1 *f();
};
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-36: Vtable for 'Test29::B' (6 entries).
// CHECK-36-NEXT: 0 | vbase_offset (0)
// CHECK-36-NEXT: 1 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-36-NEXT: 2 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-36-NEXT: 3 | Test29::B RTTI
// CHECK-36-NEXT: -- (Test29::A, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-36-NEXT: -- (Test29::B, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-36-NEXT: 4 | Test29::V2 *Test29::B::f()
// CHECK-36-NEXT: [return adjustment: 0 non-virtual, -24 vbase offset offset]
// CHECK-36-NEXT: [this adjustment: 0 non-virtual, -24 vcall offset offset]
// CHECK-36-NEXT: 5 | Test29::V2 *Test29::B::f()
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-36: VTable indices for 'Test29::B' (1 entries).
// CHECK-36-NEXT: 1 | Test29::V2 *Test29::B::f()
Another vtable layout fix, making us match gcc better. llvm-svn: 99812
2010-03-29 23:08:41 +08:00
struct B : virtual A {
virtual V2 *f();
};
V2 *B::f() { return 0; }
}
Simplify the virtual base layout code and fix a bug where we wouldn't store the offset for a virtual base. llvm-svn: 100940
2010-04-11 02:42:27 +08:00
namespace Test30 {
// Test that we don't assert when generating a vtable for F.
struct A { };
struct B : virtual A {
int i;
};
struct C {
virtual void f();
};
struct D : virtual C, B { };
struct E : virtual D { };
struct F : E {
virtual void f();
};
void F::f() { }
}
Fix a bug where we would add the same function twice in a vtable. llvm-svn: 100949
2010-04-11 04:39:29 +08:00
namespace Test31 {
// Test that we don't add D::f twice to the primary vtable.
struct A {
int a;
};
struct B {
virtual void f();
};
struct C : A, virtual B {
virtual void f();
};
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-37: Vtable for 'Test31::D' (11 entries).
// CHECK-37-NEXT: 0 | vbase_offset (0)
// CHECK-37-NEXT: 1 | vbase_offset (8)
// CHECK-37-NEXT: 2 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-37-NEXT: 3 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-37-NEXT: 4 | Test31::D RTTI
// CHECK-37-NEXT: -- (Test31::B, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-37-NEXT: -- (Test31::D, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-37-NEXT: 5 | void Test31::D::f()
// CHECK-37-NEXT: 6 | vbase_offset (-8)
// CHECK-37-NEXT: 7 | vcall_offset (-8)
// CHECK-37-NEXT: 8 | offset_to_top (-8)
// CHECK-37-NEXT: 9 | Test31::D RTTI
// CHECK-37-NEXT: -- (Test31::C, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-37-NEXT: 10 | void Test31::D::f()
// CHECK-37-NEXT: [this adjustment: 0 non-virtual, -24 vcall offset offset]
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-37: VTable indices for 'Test31::D' (1 entries).
// CHECK-37-NEXT: 0 | void Test31::D::f()
Fix a bug where we would add the same function twice in a vtable. llvm-svn: 100949
2010-04-11 04:39:29 +08:00
struct D : virtual C {
virtual void f();
};
void D::f() { }
}
Fix another vbase layout bug. llvm-svn: 100952
2010-04-11 05:35:33 +08:00
namespace Test32 {
// Check that we correctly lay out the virtual bases of 'Test32::D'.
struct A {
virtual void f();
};
struct B : virtual A { };
struct C : A, virtual B { };
struct D : virtual B { };
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-38: Virtual base offset offsets for 'Test32::E' (3 entries).
// CHECK-38-NEXT: Test32::A | -32
// CHECK-38-NEXT: Test32::B | -24
// CHECK-38-NEXT: Test32::D | -40
Fix another vbase layout bug. llvm-svn: 100952
2010-04-11 05:35:33 +08:00
struct E : C, virtual D {
virtual void f();
};
void E::f() { }
}
Fix a bug where we were adding too many vcall offsets in some cases. llvm-svn: 100985
2010-04-12 04:04:11 +08:00
namespace Test33 {
// Test that we don't emit too many vcall offsets in 'Test32::F'.
struct A {
virtual void a();
};
struct B {
virtual void b();
};
struct C : virtual A, virtual B {
virtual void c();
};
struct D : virtual C { };
struct E : A, D {
virtual void e();
};
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-39: Vtable for 'Test33::F' (30 entries).
// CHECK-39-NEXT: 0 | vbase_offset (24)
// CHECK-39-NEXT: 1 | vbase_offset (16)
// CHECK-39-NEXT: 2 | vbase_offset (16)
// CHECK-39-NEXT: 3 | vbase_offset (8)
// CHECK-39-NEXT: 4 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-39-NEXT: 5 | Test33::F RTTI
// CHECK-39-NEXT: -- (Test33::A, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-39-NEXT: -- (Test33::F, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-39-NEXT: 6 | void Test33::A::a()
// CHECK-39-NEXT: 7 | void Test33::F::f()
// CHECK-39-NEXT: 8 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-39-NEXT: 9 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-39-NEXT: 10 | vbase_offset (16)
// CHECK-39-NEXT: 11 | vbase_offset (8)
// CHECK-39-NEXT: 12 | vbase_offset (8)
// CHECK-39-NEXT: 13 | offset_to_top (-8)
// CHECK-39-NEXT: 14 | Test33::F RTTI
// CHECK-39-NEXT: -- (Test33::A, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-39-NEXT: -- (Test33::E, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-39-NEXT: 15 | void Test33::A::a()
// CHECK-39-NEXT: 16 | void Test33::E::e()
// CHECK-39-NEXT: 17 | vbase_offset (0)
// CHECK-39-NEXT: 18 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-39-NEXT: 19 | vbase_offset (8)
// CHECK-39-NEXT: 20 | vbase_offset (0)
// CHECK-39-NEXT: 21 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-39-NEXT: 22 | offset_to_top (-16)
// CHECK-39-NEXT: 23 | Test33::F RTTI
// CHECK-39-NEXT: -- (Test33::A, 16) vtable address --
// CHECK-39-NEXT: -- (Test33::C, 16) vtable address --
// CHECK-39-NEXT: -- (Test33::D, 16) vtable address --
// CHECK-39-NEXT: 24 | void Test33::A::a()
// CHECK-39-NEXT: 25 | void Test33::C::c()
// CHECK-39-NEXT: 26 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-39-NEXT: 27 | offset_to_top (-24)
// CHECK-39-NEXT: 28 | Test33::F RTTI
// CHECK-39-NEXT: -- (Test33::B, 24) vtable address --
// CHECK-39-NEXT: 29 | void Test33::B::b()
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-39: VTable indices for 'Test33::F' (1 entries).
// CHECK-39-NEXT: 1 | void Test33::F::f()
Fix a bug where we were adding too many vcall offsets in some cases. llvm-svn: 100985
2010-04-12 04:04:11 +08:00
struct F : virtual E, A {
virtual void f();
};
void F::f() { }
}
Fix another bug where we wouldn't generate secondary vtables for construction vtables in some cases. llvm-svn: 100998
2010-04-12 06:20:36 +08:00
namespace Test34 {
Typo. llvm-svn: 101015
2010-04-12 13:32:01 +08:00
// Test that we lay out the construction vtable for 'Test34::E' in 'Test34::F' correctly.
Fix another bug where we wouldn't generate secondary vtables for construction vtables in some cases. llvm-svn: 100998
2010-04-12 06:20:36 +08:00
struct A {
virtual void a();
};
struct B : virtual A { };
struct C : B, A {
virtual void c();
};
struct D : A, C { };
struct E : virtual D {
virtual void e();
};
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-40: Construction vtable for ('Test34::E', 0) in 'Test34::F' (22 entries).
// CHECK-40-NEXT: 0 | vbase_offset (0)
// CHECK-40-NEXT: 1 | vbase_offset (8)
// CHECK-40-NEXT: 2 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-40-NEXT: 3 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-40-NEXT: 4 | Test34::E RTTI
// CHECK-40-NEXT: -- (Test34::A, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-40-NEXT: -- (Test34::E, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-40-NEXT: 5 | void Test34::A::a()
// CHECK-40-NEXT: 6 | void Test34::E::e()
// CHECK-40-NEXT: 7 | vcall_offset (8)
// CHECK-40-NEXT: 8 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-40-NEXT: 9 | vbase_offset (-8)
// CHECK-40-NEXT: 10 | offset_to_top (-8)
// CHECK-40-NEXT: 11 | Test34::E RTTI
// CHECK-40-NEXT: -- (Test34::A, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-40-NEXT: -- (Test34::D, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-40-NEXT: 12 | void Test34::A::a()
// CHECK-40-NEXT: 13 | vbase_offset (-16)
// CHECK-40-NEXT: 14 | vcall_offset (-16)
// CHECK-40-NEXT: 15 | offset_to_top (-16)
// CHECK-40-NEXT: 16 | Test34::E RTTI
// CHECK-40-NEXT: -- (Test34::B, 16) vtable address --
// CHECK-40-NEXT: -- (Test34::C, 16) vtable address --
// CHECK-40-NEXT: 17 | [unused] void Test34::A::a()
// CHECK-40-NEXT: 18 | void Test34::C::c()
// CHECK-40-NEXT: 19 | offset_to_top (-24)
// CHECK-40-NEXT: 20 | Test34::E RTTI
// CHECK-40-NEXT: -- (Test34::A, 24) vtable address --
// CHECK-40-NEXT: 21 | void Test34::A::a()
Fix another bug where we wouldn't generate secondary vtables for construction vtables in some cases. llvm-svn: 100998
2010-04-12 06:20:36 +08:00
struct F : E {
virtual void f();
};
void F::f() { }
}
Split adding the primary virtual base offsets out into a separate pass. This fixes a bug where we would lay out virtual bases in the wrong order. llvm-svn: 101373
2010-04-16 00:12:58 +08:00
namespace Test35 {
// Test that we lay out the virtual bases of 'Test35::H' in the correct order.
struct A {
virtual void a();
int i;
};
struct B : virtual A {
virtual void b();
};
struct C {
virtual void c();
};
struct D : C, virtual B {
virtual void d();
};
struct E : D {
virtual void e();
bool b;
};
struct F : virtual D { };
struct G : virtual E { };
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-41: Vtable for 'Test35::H' (32 entries).
// CHECK-41-NEXT: 0 | vbase_offset (32)
// CHECK-41-NEXT: 1 | vbase_offset (0)
// CHECK-41-NEXT: 2 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-41-NEXT: 3 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-41-NEXT: 4 | vbase_offset (16)
// CHECK-41-NEXT: 5 | vbase_offset (8)
// CHECK-41-NEXT: 6 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-41-NEXT: 7 | Test35::H RTTI
// CHECK-41-NEXT: -- (Test35::C, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-41-NEXT: -- (Test35::D, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-41-NEXT: -- (Test35::F, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-41-NEXT: -- (Test35::H, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-41-NEXT: 8 | void Test35::C::c()
// CHECK-41-NEXT: 9 | void Test35::D::d()
// CHECK-41-NEXT: 10 | void Test35::H::h()
// CHECK-41-NEXT: 11 | vbase_offset (0)
// CHECK-41-NEXT: 12 | vbase_offset (24)
// CHECK-41-NEXT: 13 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-41-NEXT: 14 | vbase_offset (8)
// CHECK-41-NEXT: 15 | offset_to_top (-8)
// CHECK-41-NEXT: 16 | Test35::H RTTI
// CHECK-41-NEXT: -- (Test35::B, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-41-NEXT: -- (Test35::G, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-41-NEXT: 17 | void Test35::B::b()
// CHECK-41-NEXT: 18 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-41-NEXT: 19 | offset_to_top (-16)
// CHECK-41-NEXT: 20 | Test35::H RTTI
// CHECK-41-NEXT: -- (Test35::A, 16) vtable address --
// CHECK-41-NEXT: 21 | void Test35::A::a()
// CHECK-41-NEXT: 22 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-41-NEXT: 23 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-41-NEXT: 24 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-41-NEXT: 25 | vbase_offset (-16)
// CHECK-41-NEXT: 26 | vbase_offset (-24)
// CHECK-41-NEXT: 27 | offset_to_top (-32)
// CHECK-41-NEXT: 28 | Test35::H RTTI
// CHECK-41-NEXT: -- (Test35::C, 32) vtable address --
// CHECK-41-NEXT: -- (Test35::D, 32) vtable address --
// CHECK-41-NEXT: -- (Test35::E, 32) vtable address --
// CHECK-41-NEXT: 29 | void Test35::C::c()
// CHECK-41-NEXT: 30 | void Test35::D::d()
// CHECK-41-NEXT: 31 | void Test35::E::e()
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-41: Virtual base offset offsets for 'Test35::H' (4 entries).
// CHECK-41-NEXT: Test35::A | -32
// CHECK-41-NEXT: Test35::B | -24
// CHECK-41-NEXT: Test35::D | -56
// CHECK-41-NEXT: Test35::E | -64
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-41: VTable indices for 'Test35::H' (1 entries).
// CHECK-41-NEXT: 2 | void Test35::H::h()
Split adding the primary virtual base offsets out into a separate pass. This fixes a bug where we would lay out virtual bases in the wrong order. llvm-svn: 101373
2010-04-16 00:12:58 +08:00
struct H : F, G {
virtual void h();
};
void H::h() { }
}
Fix a bug where we would sometimes incorrectly mark an vtable function as unused. llvm-svn: 101643
2010-04-18 01:24:33 +08:00
namespace Test36 {
// Test that we don't mark B::f as unused in the vtable for D.
struct A {
virtual void f();
};
struct B : virtual A { };
struct C : virtual A {
virtual void f();
};
Rework when and how vtables are emitted, by tracking where vtables are "used" (e.g., we will refer to the vtable in the generated code) and when they are defined (i.e., because we've seen the key function definition). Previously, we were effectively tracking "potential definitions" rather than uses, so we were a bit too eager about emitting vtables for classes without key functions. The new scheme: - For every use of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the use. For example, this occurs when calling a virtual member function of the class, defining a constructor of that class type, dynamic_cast'ing from that type to a derived class, casting to/through a virtual base class, etc. - For every definition of a vtable, Sema calls MarkVTableUsed() to indicate the definition. This happens at the end of the translation unit for classes whose key function has been defined (so we can delay computation of the key function; see PR6564), and will also occur with explicit template instantiation definitions. - For every vtable defined/used, we mark all of the virtual member functions of that vtable as defined/used, unless we know that the key function is in another translation unit. This instantiates virtual member functions when needed. - At the end of the translation unit, Sema tells CodeGen (via the ASTConsumer) which vtables must be defined (CodeGen will define them) and which may be used (for which CodeGen will define the vtables lazily). From a language perspective, both the old and the new schemes are permissible: we're allowed to instantiate virtual member functions whenever we want per the standard. However, all other C++ compilers were more lazy than we were, and our eagerness was both a performance issue (we instantiated too much) and a portability problem (we broke Boost test cases, which now pass). Notes: (1) There's a ton of churn in the tests, because the order in which vtables get emitted to IR has changed. I've tried to isolate some of the larger tests from these issues. (2) Some diagnostics related to implicitly-instantiated/implicitly-defined virtual member functions have moved to the point of first use/definition. It's better this way. (3) I could use a review of the places where we MarkVTableUsed, to see if I missed any place where the language effectively requires a vtable. Fixes PR7114 and PR6564. llvm-svn: 103718
2010-05-14 00:44:06 +08:00
// CHECK-42: Vtable for 'Test36::D' (12 entries).
// CHECK-42-NEXT: 0 | vbase_offset (8)
// CHECK-42-NEXT: 1 | vbase_offset (8)
// CHECK-42-NEXT: 2 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-42-NEXT: 3 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-42-NEXT: 4 | Test36::D RTTI
// CHECK-42-NEXT: -- (Test36::C, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-42-NEXT: -- (Test36::D, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-42-NEXT: 5 | void Test36::C::f()
// CHECK-42-NEXT: 6 | void Test36::D::g()
// CHECK-42-NEXT: 7 | vbase_offset (0)
// CHECK-42-NEXT: 8 | vcall_offset (-8)
// CHECK-42-NEXT: 9 | offset_to_top (-8)
// CHECK-42-NEXT: 10 | Test36::D RTTI
// CHECK-42-NEXT: -- (Test36::A, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-42-NEXT: -- (Test36::B, 8) vtable address --
// CHECK-42-NEXT: 11 | void Test36::C::f()
// CHECK-42-NEXT: [this adjustment: 0 non-virtual, -24 vcall offset offset]
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-42: VTable indices for 'Test36::D' (1 entries).
// CHECK-42-NEXT: 1 | void Test36::D::g()
Fix a bug where we would sometimes incorrectly mark an vtable function as unused. llvm-svn: 101643
2010-04-18 01:24:33 +08:00
struct D : virtual B, C {
virtual void g();
};
void D::g() { }
}
Change CollectPrimaryBases to collect the bases in the right order. Fixes one half of PR9660. llvm-svn: 129252
2011-04-11 02:00:32 +08:00
namespace Test37 {
// Test that we give C::f the right vtable index. (PR9660).
struct A {
virtual A* f() = 0;
};
struct B : virtual A {
virtual B* f();
};
// CHECK-43: VTable indices for 'Test37::C' (1 entries).
// CHECK-43-NEXT: 1 | Test37::C *Test37::C::f()
struct C : B {
virtual C* f();
};
C* C::f() { return 0; }
}
For the annals of subtle but terrible bugs: fix a longstanding bug in vtable layout where virtual methods inherited from virtual bases could be assigned the same vcall adjustment slot if they shared a name and parameter signature but differed in their cv-qualification. The code was already trying to handle this case, but unfortunately used the ordinary type qualifiers (which are always empty here) instead of the method qualifiers. This seems like something that the API should discourage, but I don't know how to carry that principle out in this instance. Eliminate this function's need for an ASTContext while we're at it. This bug affects the ABI, and fixing it brings us into accord with the Itanium ABI (and GCC's implementation of it), but, obviously, technically breaks full compatibility with previous releases of Clang. Just letting you know. llvm-svn: 153168
2012-03-21 14:57:19 +08:00
// rdar://problem/10959710
namespace Test38 {
struct A {
virtual void *foo();
virtual const void *foo() const;
};
// CHECK-44: Vtable for 'Test38::B' (7 entries).
// CHECK-44-NEXT: 0 | vbase_offset (0)
// CHECK-44-NEXT: 1 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-44-NEXT: 2 | vcall_offset (0)
// CHECK-44-NEXT: 3 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-44-NEXT: 4 | Test38::B RTTI
// CHECK-44-NEXT: -- (Test38::A, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-44-NEXT: -- (Test38::B, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-44-NEXT: 5 | void *Test38::B::foo()
// CHECK-44-NEXT: 6 | const void *Test38::B::foo() const
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-44: VTable indices for 'Test38::B' (2 entries).
// CHECK-44-NEXT: 0 | void *Test38::B::foo()
// CHECK-44-NEXT: 1 | const void *Test38::B::foo() const
For the annals of subtle but terrible bugs: fix a longstanding bug in vtable layout where virtual methods inherited from virtual bases could be assigned the same vcall adjustment slot if they shared a name and parameter signature but differed in their cv-qualification. The code was already trying to handle this case, but unfortunately used the ordinary type qualifiers (which are always empty here) instead of the method qualifiers. This seems like something that the API should discourage, but I don't know how to carry that principle out in this instance. Eliminate this function's need for an ASTContext while we're at it. This bug affects the ABI, and fixing it brings us into accord with the Itanium ABI (and GCC's implementation of it), but, obviously, technically breaks full compatibility with previous releases of Clang. Just letting you know. llvm-svn: 153168
2012-03-21 14:57:19 +08:00
class B : virtual public A {
void *foo();
const void *foo() const;
};
void *B::foo() { return 0; }
}
Note deleted functions when dumping vtables. llvm-svn: 166056
2012-10-17 04:25:33 +08:00
namespace Test39 {
struct A {
virtual void foo() = delete;
};
// CHECK-45: Vtable for 'Test39::B' (4 entries).
// CHECK-45-NEXT: 0 | offset_to_top (0)
// CHECK-45-NEXT: 1 | Test39::B RTTI
// CHECK-45-NEXT: -- (Test39::A, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-45-NEXT: -- (Test39::B, 0) vtable address --
// CHECK-45-NEXT: 2 | void Test39::A::foo() [deleted]
// CHECK-45-NEXT: 3 | void Test39::B::foo2()
Unrevert the tests from r183298 as they pass with both old and new code llvm-svn: 183306
2013-06-05 21:12:36 +08:00
//
// CHECK-45: VTable indices for 'Test39::B' (1 entries).
// CHECK-45-NEXT: 1 | void Test39::B::foo2()
Note deleted functions when dumping vtables. llvm-svn: 166056
2012-10-17 04:25:33 +08:00
struct B: A {
virtual void foo2();
};
void B::foo2() {
}
}
Add a test for the breakage from r183298 llvm-svn: 183308
2013-06-05 21:49:11 +08:00
namespace Test40 {
struct A {
virtual void foo() = 0;
};
struct B : public A {
virtual void foo();
};
struct C: public B {
// CHECK-46: VTable indices for 'Test40::C' (8 entries).
// CHECK-46-NEXT: 1 | int Test40::C::f(int)
// CHECK-46-NEXT: 2 | int Test40::C::f()
// CHECK-46-NEXT: 3 | int Test40::C::g(int)
// CHECK-46-NEXT: 4 | int Test40::C::g()
// CHECK-46-NEXT: 5 | int Test40::C::h(int)
// CHECK-46-NEXT: 6 | int Test40::C::h()
// CHECK-46-NEXT: 7 | int Test40::C::i(int)
// CHECK-46-NEXT: 8 | int Test40::C::i()
virtual int f(int);
virtual int f();
virtual int g(int);
virtual int g();
virtual int h(int);
virtual int h();
virtual int i(int);
virtual int i();
};
Make two vtable tests tolerate C++11. In C++11 we don't emit vtables as eagerly as we do for C++03, so fiddle the tests to emit them when the test expects them. Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D27994 llvm-svn: 290205
2016-12-21 06:22:24 +08:00
// Force C's vtable to be generated.
int C::f() { return 1; }
Add a test for the breakage from r183298 llvm-svn: 183308
2013-06-05 21:49:11 +08:00
class D : C {};
D d;
}