2017-11-16 03:13:31 +08:00
|
|
|
# This test has a subtle purpose. Because of the specifics of the layout
|
|
|
|
|
# algorithm if we're not careful cycles can occur when we resolve the order
|
|
|
|
|
# that we should layout segments in. In this test we're making sure that the
|
|
|
|
|
# PT_LOAD segment won't set the PT_NOTE segment as the first to be laid out
|
|
|
|
|
# while the PT_NOTE segment sets the PT_LOAD load to be the first to be laid
|
|
|
|
|
# out. This problem becomes visible if the layout of the file changes due to
|
|
|
|
|
# the removal of a section. We use -O binary here because removing a section
|
|
|
|
|
# in this way won't cause the location of the PT_LOAD segment to change if we
|
|
|
|
|
# don't.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# RUN: yaml2obj %s -o %t
|
2018-04-24 13:43:32 +08:00
|
|
|
# RUN: llvm-objcopy -R .note -O binary %t %t2
|
2017-11-16 03:13:31 +08:00
|
|
|
# RUN: od -Ax -t x1 %t2 | FileCheck %s
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
!ELF
|
|
|
|
|
FileHeader:
|
|
|
|
|
Class: ELFCLASS64
|
|
|
|
|
Data: ELFDATA2LSB
|
|
|
|
|
Type: ET_EXEC
|
|
|
|
|
Machine: EM_X86_64
|
|
|
|
|
Sections:
|
|
|
|
|
- Name: .note
|
|
|
|
|
Type: SHT_PROGBITS
|
|
|
|
|
Flags: [ SHF_ALLOC ]
|
|
|
|
|
Address: 0x1000
|
|
|
|
|
AddressAlign: 0x1000
|
|
|
|
|
Content: "32323232"
|
|
|
|
|
Size: 32
|
|
|
|
|
- Name: .rodata
|
|
|
|
|
Flags: [ SHF_ALLOC ]
|
|
|
|
|
Type: SHT_PROGBITS
|
|
|
|
|
Address: 0x1020
|
|
|
|
|
Size: 4064
|
|
|
|
|
Content: "DEADBEEF"
|
|
|
|
|
ProgramHeaders:
|
|
|
|
|
- Type: PT_LOAD
|
|
|
|
|
Flags: [ PF_R ]
|
|
|
|
|
VAddr: 0x1000
|
|
|
|
|
PAddr: 0x1000
|
|
|
|
|
Sections:
|
|
|
|
|
- Section: .note
|
|
|
|
|
- Section: .rodata
|
|
|
|
|
- Type: PT_NOTE
|
|
|
|
|
Flags: [ PF_R ]
|
|
|
|
|
VAddr: 0x1000
|
|
|
|
|
PAddr: 0x1000
|
|
|
|
|
Sections:
|
|
|
|
|
- Section: .note
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# CHECK: 000000 de ad be ef
|
