2018-10-21 06:49:23 +08:00
|
|
|
// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=debug.DumpCFG -triple x86_64-apple-darwin12 -fheinous-gnu-extensions -std=c++11 -analyzer-config cfg-rich-constructors=false %s > %t 2>&1
|
[CFG] Add extra context to C++ constructor statement elements.
This patch adds a new CFGStmt sub-class, CFGConstructor, which replaces
the regular CFGStmt with CXXConstructExpr in it whenever the CFG has additional
information to provide regarding what sort of object is being constructed.
It is useful for figuring out what memory is initialized in client of the
CFG such as the Static Analyzer, which do not operate by recursive AST
traversal, but instead rely on the CFG to provide all the information when they
need it. Otherwise, the statement that triggers the construction and defines
what memory is being initialized would normally occur after the
construct-expression, and the client would need to peek to the next CFG element
or use statement parent map to understand the necessary facts about
the construct-expression.
As a proof of concept, CFGConstructors are added for new-expressions
and the respective test cases are provided to demonstrate how it works.
For now, the only additional data contained in the CFGConstructor element is
the "trigger statement", such as new-expression, which is the parent of the
constructor. It will be significantly expanded in later commits. The additional
data is organized as an auxiliary structure - the "construction context",
which is allocated separately from the CFGElement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42672
llvm-svn: 324668
2018-02-09 06:58:15 +08:00
|
|
|
// RUN: FileCheck --input-file=%t -check-prefixes=CHECK,WARNINGS %s
|
2018-10-21 06:49:23 +08:00
|
|
|
// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=debug.DumpCFG -triple x86_64-apple-darwin12 -fheinous-gnu-extensions -std=c++11 -analyzer-config cfg-rich-constructors=true %s > %t 2>&1
|
[CFG] Add extra context to C++ constructor statement elements.
This patch adds a new CFGStmt sub-class, CFGConstructor, which replaces
the regular CFGStmt with CXXConstructExpr in it whenever the CFG has additional
information to provide regarding what sort of object is being constructed.
It is useful for figuring out what memory is initialized in client of the
CFG such as the Static Analyzer, which do not operate by recursive AST
traversal, but instead rely on the CFG to provide all the information when they
need it. Otherwise, the statement that triggers the construction and defines
what memory is being initialized would normally occur after the
construct-expression, and the client would need to peek to the next CFG element
or use statement parent map to understand the necessary facts about
the construct-expression.
As a proof of concept, CFGConstructors are added for new-expressions
and the respective test cases are provided to demonstrate how it works.
For now, the only additional data contained in the CFGConstructor element is
the "trigger statement", such as new-expression, which is the parent of the
constructor. It will be significantly expanded in later commits. The additional
data is organized as an auxiliary structure - the "construction context",
which is allocated separately from the CFGElement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42672
llvm-svn: 324668
2018-02-09 06:58:15 +08:00
|
|
|
// RUN: FileCheck --input-file=%t -check-prefixes=CHECK,ANALYZER %s
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// This file tests how we construct two different flavors of the Clang CFG -
|
|
|
|
// the CFG used by the Sema analysis-based warnings and the CFG used by the
|
|
|
|
// static analyzer. The difference in the behavior is checked via FileCheck
|
|
|
|
// prefixes (WARNINGS and ANALYZER respectively). When introducing new analyzer
|
|
|
|
// flags, no new run lines should be added - just these flags would go to the
|
|
|
|
// respective line depending on where is it turned on and where is it turned
|
|
|
|
// off. Feel free to add tests that test only one of the CFG flavors if you're
|
|
|
|
// not sure how the other flavor is supposed to work in your case.
|
2013-01-07 17:51:17 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-01-16 01:25:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: void checkDeclStmts()
|
2013-06-04 06:59:41 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK: ENTRY
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B1]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: int i;
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: int j;
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: 1
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: int k = 1;
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 5: int l;
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 6: 2
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 7: int m = 2;
|
2018-02-10 09:55:23 +08:00
|
|
|
// WARNINGS-NEXT: (CXXConstructExpr, struct standalone)
|
|
|
|
// ANALYZER-NEXT: (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.9], struct standalone)
|
2013-06-04 06:59:41 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 9: struct standalone myStandalone;
|
2018-02-10 09:55:23 +08:00
|
|
|
// WARNINGS-NEXT: (CXXConstructExpr, struct (anonymous struct at {{.*}}))
|
|
|
|
// ANALYZER-NEXT: (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.11], struct (anonymous struct at {{.*}}))
|
2014-04-02 13:58:29 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 11: struct (anonymous struct at {{.*}}) myAnon;
|
2018-02-10 09:55:23 +08:00
|
|
|
// WARNINGS-NEXT: (CXXConstructExpr, struct named)
|
|
|
|
// ANALYZER-NEXT: (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.13], struct named)
|
2013-06-04 06:59:41 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 13: struct named myNamed;
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B2
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B0
|
|
|
|
void checkDeclStmts() {
|
|
|
|
int i, j;
|
|
|
|
int k = 1, l, m = 2;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct standalone { int x, y; };
|
|
|
|
struct standalone myStandalone;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct { int x, y; } myAnon;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct named { int x, y; } myNamed;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static_assert(1, "abc");
|
|
|
|
}
|
2013-06-05 01:38:44 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-01-16 01:25:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: void F(EmptyE e)
|
2013-06-05 01:38:44 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK: ENTRY
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B1]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: e
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: [B1.1] (ImplicitCastExpr, LValueToRValue, enum EmptyE)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: [B1.2] (ImplicitCastExpr, IntegralCast, int)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: T: switch [B1.3]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B2
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B0
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B0 (EXIT)]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B1
|
|
|
|
enum EmptyE {};
|
|
|
|
void F(EmptyE e) {
|
|
|
|
switch (e) {}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2013-08-20 00:27:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-01-16 01:25:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: void testBuiltinSize()
|
2013-08-20 00:27:28 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK: ENTRY
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B1]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: __builtin_object_size
|
2016-10-18 15:13:55 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: [B1.1] (ImplicitCastExpr, BuiltinFnToFnPtr, unsigned long (*)(const void *, int) noexcept)
|
2013-08-20 00:27:28 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: [B1.2](dummy(), 0)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: (void)[B1.3] (CStyleCastExpr, ToVoid, void)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B2
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B0
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B0 (EXIT)]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B1
|
|
|
|
void testBuiltinSize() {
|
|
|
|
extern int *dummy();
|
|
|
|
(void)__builtin_object_size(dummy(), 0);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2013-09-04 01:00:57 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class A {
|
|
|
|
public:
|
|
|
|
A() {}
|
|
|
|
~A() {}
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2014-01-16 01:25:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: void test_deletedtor()
|
2013-09-04 01:00:57 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B2 (ENTRY)]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B1]
|
2014-01-14 01:59:19 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: CFGNewAllocator(A *)
|
[CFG] Add extra context to C++ constructor statement elements.
This patch adds a new CFGStmt sub-class, CFGConstructor, which replaces
the regular CFGStmt with CXXConstructExpr in it whenever the CFG has additional
information to provide regarding what sort of object is being constructed.
It is useful for figuring out what memory is initialized in client of the
CFG such as the Static Analyzer, which do not operate by recursive AST
traversal, but instead rely on the CFG to provide all the information when they
need it. Otherwise, the statement that triggers the construction and defines
what memory is being initialized would normally occur after the
construct-expression, and the client would need to peek to the next CFG element
or use statement parent map to understand the necessary facts about
the construct-expression.
As a proof of concept, CFGConstructors are added for new-expressions
and the respective test cases are provided to demonstrate how it works.
For now, the only additional data contained in the CFGConstructor element is
the "trigger statement", such as new-expression, which is the parent of the
constructor. It will be significantly expanded in later commits. The additional
data is organized as an auxiliary structure - the "construction context",
which is allocated separately from the CFGElement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42672
llvm-svn: 324668
2018-02-09 06:58:15 +08:00
|
|
|
// WARNINGS-NEXT: 2: (CXXConstructExpr, class A)
|
|
|
|
// ANALYZER-NEXT: 2: (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.3], class A)
|
2014-01-14 01:59:19 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: new A([B1.2])
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: A *a = new A();
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 5: a
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 6: [B1.5] (ImplicitCastExpr, LValueToRValue, class A *)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 7: [B1.6]->~A() (Implicit destructor)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 8: delete [B1.6]
|
2013-09-04 01:00:57 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B2
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B0
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B0 (EXIT)]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B1
|
|
|
|
void test_deletedtor() {
|
|
|
|
A *a = new A();
|
|
|
|
delete a;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-01-16 01:25:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: void test_deleteArraydtor()
|
2013-09-04 01:00:57 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B2 (ENTRY)]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B1]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: 5
|
2014-01-14 01:59:19 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: CFGNewAllocator(A *)
|
[CFG] Add extra context to C++ constructor statement elements.
This patch adds a new CFGStmt sub-class, CFGConstructor, which replaces
the regular CFGStmt with CXXConstructExpr in it whenever the CFG has additional
information to provide regarding what sort of object is being constructed.
It is useful for figuring out what memory is initialized in client of the
CFG such as the Static Analyzer, which do not operate by recursive AST
traversal, but instead rely on the CFG to provide all the information when they
need it. Otherwise, the statement that triggers the construction and defines
what memory is being initialized would normally occur after the
construct-expression, and the client would need to peek to the next CFG element
or use statement parent map to understand the necessary facts about
the construct-expression.
As a proof of concept, CFGConstructors are added for new-expressions
and the respective test cases are provided to demonstrate how it works.
For now, the only additional data contained in the CFGConstructor element is
the "trigger statement", such as new-expression, which is the parent of the
constructor. It will be significantly expanded in later commits. The additional
data is organized as an auxiliary structure - the "construction context",
which is allocated separately from the CFGElement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42672
llvm-svn: 324668
2018-02-09 06:58:15 +08:00
|
|
|
// WARNINGS-NEXT: 3: (CXXConstructExpr, class A [5])
|
|
|
|
// ANALYZER-NEXT: 3: (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.4], class A [5])
|
2014-01-14 01:59:19 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: new A {{\[\[}}B1.1]]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 5: A *a = new A [5];
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 6: a
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 7: [B1.6] (ImplicitCastExpr, LValueToRValue, class A *)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 8: [B1.7]->~A() (Implicit destructor)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 9: delete [] [B1.7]
|
2013-09-04 01:00:57 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B2
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B0
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B0 (EXIT)]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B1
|
|
|
|
void test_deleteArraydtor() {
|
|
|
|
A *a = new A[5];
|
|
|
|
delete[] a;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2013-09-06 16:12:48 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
namespace NoReturnSingleSuccessor {
|
|
|
|
struct A {
|
|
|
|
A();
|
|
|
|
~A();
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct B : public A {
|
|
|
|
B();
|
|
|
|
~B() __attribute__((noreturn));
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2014-01-16 01:25:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: int test1(int *x)
|
2013-09-06 16:12:48 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK: 1: 1
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: return
|
2019-08-29 02:44:42 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: ~NoReturnSingleSuccessor::B() (Implicit destructor)
|
2013-09-06 16:12:48 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B0
|
|
|
|
int test1(int *x) {
|
|
|
|
B b;
|
|
|
|
if (x)
|
|
|
|
return 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-01-16 01:25:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: int test2(int *x)
|
2013-09-06 16:12:48 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK: 1: 1
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: return
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: destructor
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B0
|
|
|
|
int test2(int *x) {
|
|
|
|
const A& a = B();
|
|
|
|
if (x)
|
|
|
|
return 1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2013-12-12 07:44:05 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Test CFG support for "extending" an enum.
|
2014-01-16 01:25:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: int test_enum_with_extension(enum MyEnum value)
|
2013-12-12 07:44:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B7 (ENTRY)]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B2
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B1]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: x
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: [B1.1] (ImplicitCastExpr, LValueToRValue, int)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: return [B1.2];
|
2014-02-28 05:56:44 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (5): B3 B4 B5 B6 B2(Unreachable)
|
2013-12-12 07:44:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B0
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B2]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: 0
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: int x = 0;
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: value
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: [B2.3] (ImplicitCastExpr, LValueToRValue, enum MyEnum)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 5: [B2.4] (ImplicitCastExpr, IntegralCast, int)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: T: switch [B2.5]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B7
|
2014-02-28 05:56:44 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (5): B3 B4 B5 B6 B1(Unreachable)
|
2013-12-12 07:44:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B3]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: case D:
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: 4
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: x
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: [B3.2] = [B3.1]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: T: break;
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B2
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B4]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: case C:
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: 3
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: x
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: [B4.2] = [B4.1]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: T: break;
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B2
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B5]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: case B:
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: 2
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: x
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: [B5.2] = [B5.1]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: T: break;
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B2
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B6]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: case A:
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: 1
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: x
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: [B6.2] = [B6.1]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: T: break;
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B2
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B0 (EXIT)]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B1
|
|
|
|
enum MyEnum { A, B, C };
|
|
|
|
static const enum MyEnum D = (enum MyEnum) 32;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int test_enum_with_extension(enum MyEnum value) {
|
|
|
|
int x = 0;
|
|
|
|
switch (value) {
|
|
|
|
case A: x = 1; break;
|
|
|
|
case B: x = 2; break;
|
|
|
|
case C: x = 3; break;
|
|
|
|
case D: x = 4; break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return x;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-01-16 01:25:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: int test_enum_with_extension_default(enum MyEnum value)
|
2013-12-12 07:44:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B7 (ENTRY)]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B2
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B1]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: x
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: [B1.1] (ImplicitCastExpr, LValueToRValue, int)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: return [B1.2];
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (4): B3 B4 B5 B6
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B0
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B2]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: 0
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: int x = 0;
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: value
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: [B2.3] (ImplicitCastExpr, LValueToRValue, enum MyEnum)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 5: [B2.4] (ImplicitCastExpr, IntegralCast, int)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: T: switch [B2.5]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B7
|
2014-02-28 05:56:44 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (4): B4 B5 B6 B3(Unreachable)
|
2013-12-12 07:44:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B3]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: default:
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: 4
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: x
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: [B3.2] = [B3.1]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: T: break;
|
2014-02-28 05:56:44 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B2(Unreachable)
|
2013-12-12 07:44:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B4]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: case C:
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: 3
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: x
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: [B4.2] = [B4.1]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: T: break;
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B2
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B5]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: case B:
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: 2
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: x
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: [B5.2] = [B5.1]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: T: break;
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B2
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B6]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: case A:
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: 1
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: x
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: [B6.2] = [B6.1]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: T: break;
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B2
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B0 (EXIT)]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B1
|
|
|
|
int test_enum_with_extension_default(enum MyEnum value) {
|
|
|
|
int x = 0;
|
|
|
|
switch (value) {
|
|
|
|
case A: x = 1; break;
|
|
|
|
case B: x = 2; break;
|
|
|
|
case C: x = 3; break;
|
|
|
|
default: x = 4; break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return x;
|
2014-01-14 01:59:19 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-01-16 01:25:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: void test_placement_new()
|
2014-01-14 01:59:19 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B2 (ENTRY)]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B1]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: int buffer[16];
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: buffer
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: [B1.2] (ImplicitCastExpr, ArrayToPointerDecay, int *)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: [B1.3] (ImplicitCastExpr, BitCast, void *)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 5: CFGNewAllocator(MyClass *)
|
[CFG] Add extra context to C++ constructor statement elements.
This patch adds a new CFGStmt sub-class, CFGConstructor, which replaces
the regular CFGStmt with CXXConstructExpr in it whenever the CFG has additional
information to provide regarding what sort of object is being constructed.
It is useful for figuring out what memory is initialized in client of the
CFG such as the Static Analyzer, which do not operate by recursive AST
traversal, but instead rely on the CFG to provide all the information when they
need it. Otherwise, the statement that triggers the construction and defines
what memory is being initialized would normally occur after the
construct-expression, and the client would need to peek to the next CFG element
or use statement parent map to understand the necessary facts about
the construct-expression.
As a proof of concept, CFGConstructors are added for new-expressions
and the respective test cases are provided to demonstrate how it works.
For now, the only additional data contained in the CFGConstructor element is
the "trigger statement", such as new-expression, which is the parent of the
constructor. It will be significantly expanded in later commits. The additional
data is organized as an auxiliary structure - the "construction context",
which is allocated separately from the CFGElement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42672
llvm-svn: 324668
2018-02-09 06:58:15 +08:00
|
|
|
// WARNINGS-NEXT: 6: (CXXConstructExpr, class MyClass)
|
|
|
|
// ANALYZER-NEXT: 6: (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.7], class MyClass)
|
2014-01-14 01:59:19 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 7: new ([B1.4]) MyClass([B1.6])
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 8: MyClass *obj = new (buffer) MyClass();
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B2
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B0
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B0 (EXIT)]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
extern void* operator new (unsigned long sz, void* v);
|
|
|
|
extern void* operator new[] (unsigned long sz, void* ptr);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class MyClass {
|
|
|
|
public:
|
|
|
|
MyClass() {}
|
|
|
|
~MyClass() {}
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void test_placement_new() {
|
|
|
|
int buffer[16];
|
|
|
|
MyClass* obj = new (buffer) MyClass();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-01-16 01:25:05 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: void test_placement_new_array()
|
2014-01-14 01:59:19 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B2 (ENTRY)]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B1]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: int buffer[16];
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: buffer
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: [B1.2] (ImplicitCastExpr, ArrayToPointerDecay, int *)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: [B1.3] (ImplicitCastExpr, BitCast, void *)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 5: 5
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 6: CFGNewAllocator(MyClass *)
|
[CFG] Add extra context to C++ constructor statement elements.
This patch adds a new CFGStmt sub-class, CFGConstructor, which replaces
the regular CFGStmt with CXXConstructExpr in it whenever the CFG has additional
information to provide regarding what sort of object is being constructed.
It is useful for figuring out what memory is initialized in client of the
CFG such as the Static Analyzer, which do not operate by recursive AST
traversal, but instead rely on the CFG to provide all the information when they
need it. Otherwise, the statement that triggers the construction and defines
what memory is being initialized would normally occur after the
construct-expression, and the client would need to peek to the next CFG element
or use statement parent map to understand the necessary facts about
the construct-expression.
As a proof of concept, CFGConstructors are added for new-expressions
and the respective test cases are provided to demonstrate how it works.
For now, the only additional data contained in the CFGConstructor element is
the "trigger statement", such as new-expression, which is the parent of the
constructor. It will be significantly expanded in later commits. The additional
data is organized as an auxiliary structure - the "construction context",
which is allocated separately from the CFGElement.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42672
llvm-svn: 324668
2018-02-09 06:58:15 +08:00
|
|
|
// WARNINGS-NEXT: 7: (CXXConstructExpr, class MyClass [5])
|
|
|
|
// ANALYZER-NEXT: 7: (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.8], class MyClass [5])
|
2014-01-14 01:59:19 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 8: new ([B1.4]) MyClass {{\[\[}}B1.5]]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 9: MyClass *obj = new (buffer) MyClass [5];
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B2
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B0
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B0 (EXIT)]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void test_placement_new_array() {
|
|
|
|
int buffer[16];
|
|
|
|
MyClass* obj = new (buffer) MyClass[5];
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-01-15 01:29:12 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014-07-30 16:34:42 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: void test_lifetime_extended_temporaries()
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B1]
|
|
|
|
struct LifetimeExtend { LifetimeExtend(int); ~LifetimeExtend(); };
|
|
|
|
struct Aggregate { const LifetimeExtend a; const LifetimeExtend b; };
|
|
|
|
struct AggregateRef { const LifetimeExtend &a; const LifetimeExtend &b; };
|
|
|
|
void test_lifetime_extended_temporaries() {
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: LifetimeExtend(1);
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: : 1
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: ~LifetimeExtend()
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NOT: ~LifetimeExtend()
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
const LifetimeExtend &l = LifetimeExtend(1);
|
|
|
|
1;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: LifetimeExtend(2)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: ~LifetimeExtend()
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: : 2
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NOT: ~LifetimeExtend()
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// No life-time extension.
|
|
|
|
const int &l = (LifetimeExtend(2), 2);
|
|
|
|
2;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: LifetimeExtend(3)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: : 3
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: ~LifetimeExtend()
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NOT: ~LifetimeExtend()
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// The last one is lifetime extended.
|
|
|
|
const LifetimeExtend &l = (3, LifetimeExtend(3));
|
|
|
|
3;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: LifetimeExtend(4)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: ~LifetimeExtend()
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: ~LifetimeExtend()
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: : 4
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NOT: ~LifetimeExtend()
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
Aggregate a{LifetimeExtend(4), LifetimeExtend(4)};
|
|
|
|
4;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: LifetimeExtend(5)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: : 5
|
|
|
|
// FIXME: We want to emit the destructors of the lifetime
|
|
|
|
// extended variables here.
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NOT: ~LifetimeExtend()
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
AggregateRef a{LifetimeExtend(5), LifetimeExtend(5)};
|
|
|
|
5;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// FIXME: Add tests for lifetime extension via subobject
|
|
|
|
// references (LifetimeExtend().some_member).
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-01-19 07:05:07 +08:00
|
|
|
// FIXME: The destructor for 'a' shouldn't be there because it's deleted
|
|
|
|
// in the union.
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: void foo()
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B2 (ENTRY)]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B1]
|
|
|
|
// WARNINGS-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, struct pr37688_deleted_union_destructor::A)
|
|
|
|
// ANALYZER-NEXT: 1: (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.2], struct pr37688_deleted_union_destructor::A)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: pr37688_deleted_union_destructor::A a;
|
2019-08-29 02:44:42 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: [B1.2].~pr37688_deleted_union_destructor::A() (Implicit destructor)
|
2019-01-19 07:05:07 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B2
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B0
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B0 (EXIT)]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
namespace pr37688_deleted_union_destructor {
|
|
|
|
struct S { ~S(); };
|
|
|
|
struct A {
|
|
|
|
~A() noexcept {}
|
|
|
|
union {
|
|
|
|
struct {
|
|
|
|
S s;
|
|
|
|
} ss;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
void foo() {
|
|
|
|
A a;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} // end namespace pr37688_deleted_union_destructor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019-08-30 04:37:28 +08:00
|
|
|
namespace return_statement_expression {
|
|
|
|
int unknown();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: int foo()
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B6 (ENTRY)]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B5
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B1]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: 0
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: return [B1.1];
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B5
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B0
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B2]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: 0
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: ({ ... ; [B2.1] })
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: return [B2.2];
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B4
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B0
|
|
|
|
// FIXME: Why do we have [B3] at all?
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B3]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B4
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B4]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: 0
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: [B4.1] (ImplicitCastExpr, IntegralToBoolean, _Bool)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: T: while [B4.2]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (2): B3 B5
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (2): NULL B2
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B5]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: unknown
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: [B5.1] (ImplicitCastExpr, FunctionToPointerDecay, int (*)(void))
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: [B5.2]()
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: [B5.3] (ImplicitCastExpr, IntegralToBoolean, _Bool)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: T: if [B5.4]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B6
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (2): B4 B1
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B0 (EXIT)]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (2): B1 B2
|
|
|
|
int foo() {
|
|
|
|
if (unknown())
|
|
|
|
return ({
|
|
|
|
while (0)
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
0;
|
|
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
} // namespace statement_expression_in_return
|
|
|
|
|
[Analyzer] Include typedef statements in CFG build.
Summary:
Array size expressions in typedef statements with a VLA
(variable-length array) are handled from now as in plain
(non-typedef) VLA declarations.
Type-aliases with VLA are handled too
(but main focus is on C code).
Reviewers: Szelethus, aaron.ballman, NoQ, xazax.hun
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, xazax.hun
Subscribers: rnkovacs, NoQ, efriedma, xazax.hun, baloghadamsoftware, szepet, a.sidorin, mikhail.ramalho, Szelethus, donat.nagy, dkrupp, gamesh411, Charusso, martong, ASDenysPetrov, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77809
2020-04-27 15:45:38 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: void vla_simple(int x)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B1]
|
2019-09-21 10:37:10 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: x
|
[Analyzer] Include typedef statements in CFG build.
Summary:
Array size expressions in typedef statements with a VLA
(variable-length array) are handled from now as in plain
(non-typedef) VLA declarations.
Type-aliases with VLA are handled too
(but main focus is on C code).
Reviewers: Szelethus, aaron.ballman, NoQ, xazax.hun
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, xazax.hun
Subscribers: rnkovacs, NoQ, efriedma, xazax.hun, baloghadamsoftware, szepet, a.sidorin, mikhail.ramalho, Szelethus, donat.nagy, dkrupp, gamesh411, Charusso, martong, ASDenysPetrov, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77809
2020-04-27 15:45:38 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: [B1.1] (ImplicitCastExpr, LValueToRValue, int)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: int vla[x];
|
|
|
|
void vla_simple(int x) {
|
|
|
|
int vla[x];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: void vla_typedef(int x)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B1]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: x
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: [B1.1] (ImplicitCastExpr, LValueToRValue, int)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: typedef int VLA[x];
|
|
|
|
void vla_typedef(int x) {
|
|
|
|
typedef int VLA[x];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: void vla_typealias(int x)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B1]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: x
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: [B1.1] (ImplicitCastExpr, LValueToRValue, int)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: using VLA = int [x];
|
|
|
|
void vla_typealias(int x) {
|
|
|
|
using VLA = int[x];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: void vla_typedef_multi(int x, int y)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B1]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: y
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: [B1.1] (ImplicitCastExpr, LValueToRValue, int)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: x
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: [B1.3] (ImplicitCastExpr, LValueToRValue, int)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 5: typedef int VLA[x][y];
|
|
|
|
void vla_typedef_multi(int x, int y) {
|
|
|
|
typedef int VLA[x][y];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: void vla_typedefname_multi(int x, int y)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B1]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: x
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: [B1.1] (ImplicitCastExpr, LValueToRValue, int)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: typedef int VLA[x];
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: y
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 5: [B1.4] (ImplicitCastExpr, LValueToRValue, int)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 6: typedef VLA VLA1[y];
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 7: 3
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 8: using VLA2 = VLA1 [3];
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 9: 4
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 10: VLA2 vla[4];
|
|
|
|
void vla_typedefname_multi(int x, int y) {
|
|
|
|
typedef int VLA[x];
|
|
|
|
typedef VLA VLA1[y];
|
|
|
|
using VLA2 = VLA1[3];
|
|
|
|
VLA2 vla[4];
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: int vla_evaluate(int x)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B1]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: x
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: ++[B1.1]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: [B1.2] (ImplicitCastExpr, LValueToRValue, int)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: typedef int VLA[++x];
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 5: x
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 6: ++[B1.5]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 7: [B1.6] (ImplicitCastExpr, LValueToRValue, int)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 8: sizeof(int [++x])
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 9: alignof(int [++x])
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 10: 0
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 11: x
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 12: [B1.11] (ImplicitCastExpr, LValueToRValue, int)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 13: return [B1.12];
|
|
|
|
int vla_evaluate(int x) {
|
|
|
|
// Evaluates the ++x
|
|
|
|
typedef int VLA[++x];
|
|
|
|
sizeof(int[++x]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Do not evaluate the ++x
|
|
|
|
_Alignof(int[++x]);
|
|
|
|
_Generic((int(*)[++x])0, default : 0);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return x;
|
2019-09-21 10:37:10 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-11-10 16:49:37 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: template<> int *PR18472<int>()
|
2014-01-15 01:29:12 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B2 (ENTRY)]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B1]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: 0
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: [B1.1] (ImplicitCastExpr, NullToPointer, PR18472_t)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: (PR18472_t)[B1.2] (CStyleCastExpr, NoOp, PR18472_t)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: CFGNewAllocator(int *)
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 5: new (([B1.3])) int
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 6: return [B1.5];
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B2
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B0
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B0 (EXIT)]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
extern "C" typedef int *PR18472_t;
|
|
|
|
void *operator new (unsigned long, PR18472_t);
|
|
|
|
template <class T> T *PR18472() {
|
|
|
|
return new (((PR18472_t) 0)) T;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void PR18472_helper() {
|
|
|
|
PR18472<int>();
|
|
|
|
}
|