llvm-project/llvm/test/CodeGen/X86/sse41-schedule.ll

2248 lines
94 KiB
LLVM
Raw Normal View History

; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -print-schedule -mcpu=x86-64 -mattr=+sse4.1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK --check-prefix=GENERIC
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -print-schedule -mcpu=slm | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK --check-prefix=SLM
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -print-schedule -mcpu=sandybridge | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK --check-prefix=SANDY
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -print-schedule -mcpu=ivybridge | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK --check-prefix=SANDY
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -print-schedule -mcpu=haswell | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK --check-prefix=HASWELL
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -print-schedule -mcpu=skylake | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK --check-prefix=HASWELL
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -print-schedule -mcpu=btver2 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK --check-prefix=BTVER2
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -print-schedule -mcpu=znver1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK --check-prefix=ZNVER1
define <2 x double> @test_blendpd(<2 x double> %a0, <2 x double> %a1, <2 x double> *%a2) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_blendpd:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: blendpd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],xmm1[1] sched: [1:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: addpd %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: blendpd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],mem[1] sched: [7:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_blendpd:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: blendpd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],xmm1[1] sched: [1:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: addpd %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: blendpd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],mem[1] sched: [4:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_blendpd:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vblendpd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],xmm1[1] sched: [1:1.00]
; SANDY-NEXT: vaddpd %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vblendpd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],mem[1] sched: [7:1.00]
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_blendpd:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vblendpd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],xmm1[1] sched: [1:0.33]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vaddpd %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vblendpd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],mem[1] sched: [5:0.50]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_blendpd:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vblendpd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],xmm1[1] sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vaddpd %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vblendpd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],mem[1] sched: [6:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_blendpd:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vblendpd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],xmm1[1] sched: [1:0.50]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vaddpd %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vblendpd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],mem[1] sched: [8:0.50]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = shufflevector <2 x double> %a0, <2 x double> %a1, <2 x i32> <i32 0, i32 3>
%2 = load <2 x double>, <2 x double> *%a2, align 16
%3 = fadd <2 x double> %a1, %1
%4 = shufflevector <2 x double> %3, <2 x double> %2, <2 x i32> <i32 0, i32 3>
ret <2 x double> %4
}
define <4 x float> @test_blendps(<4 x float> %a0, <4 x float> %a1, <4 x float> *%a2) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_blendps:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: blendps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],xmm1[1,2],xmm0[3] sched: [1:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: blendps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],mem[1],xmm0[2,3] sched: [7:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_blendps:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: blendps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],xmm1[1,2],xmm0[3] sched: [1:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: blendps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],mem[1],xmm0[2,3] sched: [4:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_blendps:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vblendps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],xmm1[1,2],xmm0[3] sched: [1:1.00]
; SANDY-NEXT: vblendps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],mem[1],xmm0[2,3] sched: [7:1.00]
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_blendps:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vblendps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],xmm1[1,2],xmm0[3] sched: [1:0.33]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vblendps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],mem[1],xmm0[2,3] sched: [5:0.50]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_blendps:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vblendps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],xmm1[1,2],xmm0[3] sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vblendps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],mem[1],xmm0[2,3] sched: [6:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_blendps:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vblendps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],xmm1[1,2],xmm0[3] sched: [1:0.50]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vblendps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],mem[1],xmm0[2,3] sched: [8:0.50]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = shufflevector <4 x float> %a0, <4 x float> %a1, <4 x i32> <i32 0, i32 5, i32 6, i32 3>
%2 = load <4 x float>, <4 x float> *%a2, align 16
%3 = shufflevector <4 x float> %1, <4 x float> %2, <4 x i32> <i32 0, i32 5, i32 2, i32 3>
ret <4 x float> %3
}
define <2 x double> @test_blendvpd(<2 x double> %a0, <2 x double> %a1, <2 x double> %a2, <2 x double> *%a3) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_blendvpd:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: movapd %xmm0, %xmm3 # sched: [1:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: movaps %xmm2, %xmm0 # sched: [1:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: blendvpd %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm3 # sched: [2:2.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: blendvpd %xmm0, (%rdi), %xmm3 # sched: [8:2.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: movapd %xmm3, %xmm0 # sched: [1:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_blendvpd:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: movapd %xmm0, %xmm3 # sched: [1:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: movaps %xmm2, %xmm0 # sched: [1:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: blendvpd %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm3 # sched: [1:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: blendvpd %xmm0, (%rdi), %xmm3 # sched: [4:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: movapd %xmm3, %xmm0 # sched: [1:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_blendvpd:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vblendvpd %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [2:2.00]
; SANDY-NEXT: vblendvpd %xmm2, (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [8:2.00]
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_blendvpd:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vblendvpd %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [2:2.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vblendvpd %xmm2, (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [6:2.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_blendvpd:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vblendvpd %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [2:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vblendvpd %xmm2, (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [7:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_blendvpd:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vblendvpd %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vblendvpd %xmm2, (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [8:0.50]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = call <2 x double> @llvm.x86.sse41.blendvpd(<2 x double> %a0, <2 x double> %a1, <2 x double> %a2)
%2 = load <2 x double>, <2 x double> *%a3, align 16
%3 = call <2 x double> @llvm.x86.sse41.blendvpd(<2 x double> %1, <2 x double> %2, <2 x double> %a2)
ret <2 x double> %3
}
declare <2 x double> @llvm.x86.sse41.blendvpd(<2 x double>, <2 x double>, <2 x double>) nounwind readnone
define <4 x float> @test_blendvps(<4 x float> %a0, <4 x float> %a1, <4 x float> %a2, <4 x float> *%a3) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_blendvps:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: movaps %xmm0, %xmm3 # sched: [1:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: movaps %xmm2, %xmm0 # sched: [1:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: blendvps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm3 # sched: [2:2.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: blendvps %xmm0, (%rdi), %xmm3 # sched: [8:2.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: movaps %xmm3, %xmm0 # sched: [1:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_blendvps:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: movaps %xmm0, %xmm3 # sched: [1:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: movaps %xmm2, %xmm0 # sched: [1:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: blendvps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm3 # sched: [1:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: blendvps %xmm0, (%rdi), %xmm3 # sched: [4:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: movaps %xmm3, %xmm0 # sched: [1:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_blendvps:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vblendvps %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [2:2.00]
; SANDY-NEXT: vblendvps %xmm2, (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [8:2.00]
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_blendvps:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vblendvps %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [2:2.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vblendvps %xmm2, (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [6:2.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_blendvps:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vblendvps %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [2:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vblendvps %xmm2, (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [7:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_blendvps:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vblendvps %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vblendvps %xmm2, (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [8:0.50]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = call <4 x float> @llvm.x86.sse41.blendvps(<4 x float> %a0, <4 x float> %a1, <4 x float> %a2)
%2 = load <4 x float>, <4 x float> *%a3
%3 = call <4 x float> @llvm.x86.sse41.blendvps(<4 x float> %1, <4 x float> %2, <4 x float> %a2)
ret <4 x float> %3
}
declare <4 x float> @llvm.x86.sse41.blendvps(<4 x float>, <4 x float>, <4 x float>) nounwind readnone
define <2 x double> @test_dppd(<2 x double> %a0, <2 x double> %a1, <2 x double> *%a2) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_dppd:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: dppd $7, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [9:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: dppd $7, (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [15:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_dppd:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: dppd $7, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: dppd $7, (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [6:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_dppd:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vdppd $7, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [9:1.00]
; SANDY-NEXT: vdppd $7, (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [15:1.00]
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_dppd:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vdppd $7, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [9:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vdppd $7, (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [13:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_dppd:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vdppd $7, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vdppd $7, (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [8:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_dppd:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vdppd $7, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vdppd $7, (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [10:1.00]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = call <2 x double> @llvm.x86.sse41.dppd(<2 x double> %a0, <2 x double> %a1, i8 7)
%2 = load <2 x double>, <2 x double> *%a2, align 16
%3 = call <2 x double> @llvm.x86.sse41.dppd(<2 x double> %1, <2 x double> %2, i8 7)
ret <2 x double> %3
}
declare <2 x double> @llvm.x86.sse41.dppd(<2 x double>, <2 x double>, i8) nounwind readnone
define <4 x float> @test_dpps(<4 x float> %a0, <4 x float> %a1, <4 x float> *%a2) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_dpps:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: dpps $7, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [12:2.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: dpps $7, (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [7:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_dpps:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: dpps $7, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: dpps $7, (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [6:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_dpps:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vdpps $7, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [12:2.00]
; SANDY-NEXT: vdpps $7, (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [7:1.00]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_dpps:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vdpps $7, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [14:2.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vdpps $7, (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [18:2.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_dpps:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vdpps $7, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vdpps $7, (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [8:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_dpps:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vdpps $7, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vdpps $7, (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [10:1.00]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = call <4 x float> @llvm.x86.sse41.dpps(<4 x float> %a0, <4 x float> %a1, i8 7)
%2 = load <4 x float>, <4 x float> *%a2, align 16
%3 = call <4 x float> @llvm.x86.sse41.dpps(<4 x float> %1, <4 x float> %2, i8 7)
ret <4 x float> %3
}
declare <4 x float> @llvm.x86.sse41.dpps(<4 x float>, <4 x float>, i8) nounwind readnone
define <4 x float> @test_insertps(<4 x float> %a0, <4 x float> %a1, float *%a2) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_insertps:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: insertps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = zero,xmm1[0],xmm0[2,3] sched: [1:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: insertps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,1,2],mem[0] sched: [7:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_insertps:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: insertps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = zero,xmm1[0],xmm0[2,3] sched: [1:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: insertps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,1,2],mem[0] sched: [4:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_insertps:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
; SANDY-NEXT: vinsertps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = zero,xmm1[0],xmm0[2,3] sched: [1:1.00]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vinsertps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,1,2],mem[0] sched: [7:1.00]
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_insertps:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vinsertps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = zero,xmm1[0],xmm0[2,3] sched: [1:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vinsertps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,1,2],mem[0] sched: [5:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_insertps:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vinsertps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = zero,xmm1[0],xmm0[2,3] sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vinsertps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,1,2],mem[0] sched: [6:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_insertps:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vinsertps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = zero,xmm1[0],xmm0[2,3] sched: [1:0.50]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vinsertps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,1,2],mem[0] sched: [8:0.50]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = call <4 x float> @llvm.x86.sse41.insertps(<4 x float> %a0, <4 x float> %a1, i8 17)
%2 = load float, float *%a2
%3 = insertelement <4 x float> %1, float %2, i32 3
ret <4 x float> %3
}
declare <4 x float> @llvm.x86.sse41.insertps(<4 x float>, <4 x float>, i8) nounwind readnone
define <2 x i64> @test_movntdqa(i8* %a0) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_movntdqa:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: movntdqa (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [6:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_movntdqa:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: movntdqa (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_movntdqa:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vmovntdqa (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [6:0.50]
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_movntdqa:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vmovntdqa (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [4:0.50]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_movntdqa:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmovntdqa (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_movntdqa:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vmovntdqa (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [8:0.50]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = call <2 x i64> @llvm.x86.sse41.movntdqa(i8* %a0)
ret <2 x i64> %1
}
declare <2 x i64> @llvm.x86.sse41.movntdqa(i8*) nounwind readnone
define <8 x i16> @test_mpsadbw(<16 x i8> %a0, <16 x i8> %a1, <16 x i8> *%a2) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_mpsadbw:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: mpsadbw $7, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: mpsadbw $7, (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [11:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_mpsadbw:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: mpsadbw $7, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [7:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: mpsadbw $7, (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [10:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_mpsadbw:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vmpsadbw $7, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
; SANDY-NEXT: vmpsadbw $7, (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [11:1.00]
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_mpsadbw:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vmpsadbw $7, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [6:2.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vmpsadbw $7, (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [6:2.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_mpsadbw:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmpsadbw $7, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [3:2.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmpsadbw $7, (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [8:2.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_mpsadbw:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vmpsadbw $7, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [100:?]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vmpsadbw $7, (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [100:?]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = call <8 x i16> @llvm.x86.sse41.mpsadbw(<16 x i8> %a0, <16 x i8> %a1, i8 7)
%2 = bitcast <8 x i16> %1 to <16 x i8>
%3 = load <16 x i8>, <16 x i8> *%a2, align 16
%4 = call <8 x i16> @llvm.x86.sse41.mpsadbw(<16 x i8> %2, <16 x i8> %3, i8 7)
ret <8 x i16> %4
}
declare <8 x i16> @llvm.x86.sse41.mpsadbw(<16 x i8>, <16 x i8>, i8) nounwind readnone
define <8 x i16> @test_packusdw(<4 x i32> %a0, <4 x i32> %a1, <4 x i32> *%a2) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_packusdw:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: packusdw %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: packusdw (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [7:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_packusdw:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: packusdw %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: packusdw (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [4:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_packusdw:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
; SANDY-NEXT: vpackusdw %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vpackusdw (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [7:0.50]
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_packusdw:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpackusdw %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpackusdw (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_packusdw:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpackusdw %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpackusdw (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [6:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_packusdw:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpackusdw %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpackusdw (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [8:0.50]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = call <8 x i16> @llvm.x86.sse41.packusdw(<4 x i32> %a0, <4 x i32> %a1)
%2 = bitcast <8 x i16> %1 to <4 x i32>
%3 = load <4 x i32>, <4 x i32> *%a2, align 16
%4 = call <8 x i16> @llvm.x86.sse41.packusdw(<4 x i32> %2, <4 x i32> %3)
ret <8 x i16> %4
}
declare <8 x i16> @llvm.x86.sse41.packusdw(<4 x i32>, <4 x i32>) nounwind readnone
define <16 x i8> @test_pblendvb(<16 x i8> %a0, <16 x i8> %a1, <16 x i8> %a2, <16 x i8> *%a3) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_pblendvb:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: movdqa %xmm0, %xmm3 # sched: [1:0.33]
; GENERIC-NEXT: movaps %xmm2, %xmm0 # sched: [1:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: pblendvb %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm3 # sched: [8:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: pblendvb %xmm0, (%rdi), %xmm3 # sched: [6:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: movdqa %xmm3, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.33]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_pblendvb:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: movdqa %xmm0, %xmm3 # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: movaps %xmm2, %xmm0 # sched: [1:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: pblendvb %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm3 # sched: [1:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: pblendvb %xmm0, (%rdi), %xmm3 # sched: [4:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: movdqa %xmm3, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_pblendvb:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
; SANDY-NEXT: vpblendvb %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [2:1.00]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vpblendvb %xmm2, (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [8:1.00]
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_pblendvb:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpblendvb %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [2:2.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpblendvb %xmm2, (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [6:2.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_pblendvb:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpblendvb %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [2:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpblendvb %xmm2, (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [7:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_pblendvb:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpblendvb %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:1.00]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpblendvb %xmm2, (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [8:1.00]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = call <16 x i8> @llvm.x86.sse41.pblendvb(<16 x i8> %a0, <16 x i8> %a1, <16 x i8> %a2)
%2 = load <16 x i8>, <16 x i8> *%a3, align 16
%3 = call <16 x i8> @llvm.x86.sse41.pblendvb(<16 x i8> %1, <16 x i8> %2, <16 x i8> %a2)
ret <16 x i8> %3
}
declare <16 x i8> @llvm.x86.sse41.pblendvb(<16 x i8>, <16 x i8>, <16 x i8>) nounwind readnone
define <8 x i16> @test_pblendw(<8 x i16> %a0, <8 x i16> %a1, <8 x i16> *%a2) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_pblendw:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: pblendw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],xmm1[1],xmm0[2],xmm1[3],xmm0[4],xmm1[5],xmm0[6],xmm1[7] sched: [1:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: pblendw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,1],mem[2,3],xmm0[4,5,6],mem[7] sched: [7:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_pblendw:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: pblendw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],xmm1[1],xmm0[2],xmm1[3],xmm0[4],xmm1[5],xmm0[6],xmm1[7] sched: [1:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: pblendw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,1],mem[2,3],xmm0[4,5,6],mem[7] sched: [4:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_pblendw:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
; SANDY-NEXT: vpblendw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],xmm1[1],xmm0[2],xmm1[3],xmm0[4],xmm1[5],xmm0[6],xmm1[7] sched: [1:0.50]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vpblendw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,1],mem[2,3],xmm0[4,5,6],mem[7] sched: [7:0.50]
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_pblendw:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpblendw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],xmm1[1],xmm0[2],xmm1[3],xmm0[4],xmm1[5],xmm0[6],xmm1[7] sched: [1:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpblendw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,1],mem[2,3],xmm0[4,5,6],mem[7] sched: [4:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_pblendw:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpblendw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],xmm1[1],xmm0[2],xmm1[3],xmm0[4],xmm1[5],xmm0[6],xmm1[7] sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpblendw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,1],mem[2,3],xmm0[4,5,6],mem[7] sched: [6:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_pblendw:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpblendw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],xmm1[1],xmm0[2],xmm1[3],xmm0[4],xmm1[5],xmm0[6],xmm1[7] sched: [1:0.50]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpblendw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,1],mem[2,3],xmm0[4,5,6],mem[7] sched: [8:0.50]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = shufflevector <8 x i16> %a0, <8 x i16> %a1, <8 x i32> <i32 0, i32 9, i32 2, i32 11, i32 4, i32 13, i32 6, i32 15>
%2 = load <8 x i16>, <8 x i16> *%a2, align 16
%3 = shufflevector <8 x i16> %1, <8 x i16> %2, <8 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1, i32 10, i32 11, i32 4, i32 5, i32 6, i32 15>
ret <8 x i16> %3
}
define <2 x i64> @test_pcmpeqq(<2 x i64> %a0, <2 x i64> %a1, <2 x i64> *%a2) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_pcmpeqq:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: pcmpeqq %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: pcmpeqq (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [7:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_pcmpeqq:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: pcmpeqq %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: pcmpeqq (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [4:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_pcmpeqq:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vpcmpeqq %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; SANDY-NEXT: vpcmpeqq (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [7:0.50]
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_pcmpeqq:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpcmpeqq %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpcmpeqq (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_pcmpeqq:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpcmpeqq %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpcmpeqq (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [6:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_pcmpeqq:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpcmpeqq %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpcmpeqq (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [8:0.50]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = icmp eq <2 x i64> %a0, %a1
%2 = sext <2 x i1> %1 to <2 x i64>
%3 = load <2 x i64>, <2 x i64>*%a2, align 16
%4 = icmp eq <2 x i64> %2, %3
%5 = sext <2 x i1> %4 to <2 x i64>
ret <2 x i64> %5
}
define i32 @test_pextrb(<16 x i8> %a0, i8 *%a1) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_pextrb:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: pextrb $3, %xmm0, %eax # sched: [3:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: pextrb $1, %xmm0, (%rdi) # sched: [5:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_pextrb:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: pextrb $3, %xmm0, %eax # sched: [1:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: pextrb $1, %xmm0, (%rdi) # sched: [4:2.00]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_pextrb:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vpextrb $3, %xmm0, %eax # sched: [3:1.00]
; SANDY-NEXT: vpextrb $1, %xmm0, (%rdi) # sched: [5:1.00]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_pextrb:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpextrb $3, %xmm0, %eax # sched: [1:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpextrb $1, %xmm0, (%rdi) # sched: [5:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_pextrb:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpextrb $3, %xmm0, %eax # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpextrb $1, %xmm0, (%rdi) # sched: [6:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_pextrb:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpextrb $3, %xmm0, %eax # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpextrb $1, %xmm0, (%rdi) # sched: [8:1.00]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = extractelement <16 x i8> %a0, i32 3
%2 = extractelement <16 x i8> %a0, i32 1
store i8 %2, i8 *%a1
%3 = zext i8 %1 to i32
ret i32 %3
}
define i32 @test_pextrd(<4 x i32> %a0, i32 *%a1) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_pextrd:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: pextrd $3, %xmm0, %eax # sched: [3:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: pextrd $1, %xmm0, (%rdi) # sched: [5:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_pextrd:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: pextrd $3, %xmm0, %eax # sched: [1:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: pextrd $1, %xmm0, (%rdi) # sched: [4:2.00]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_pextrd:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vpextrd $3, %xmm0, %eax # sched: [3:1.00]
; SANDY-NEXT: vpextrd $1, %xmm0, (%rdi) # sched: [5:1.00]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_pextrd:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpextrd $3, %xmm0, %eax # sched: [1:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpextrd $1, %xmm0, (%rdi) # sched: [5:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_pextrd:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpextrd $3, %xmm0, %eax # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpextrd $1, %xmm0, (%rdi) # sched: [6:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_pextrd:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpextrd $3, %xmm0, %eax # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpextrd $1, %xmm0, (%rdi) # sched: [8:1.00]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = extractelement <4 x i32> %a0, i32 3
%2 = extractelement <4 x i32> %a0, i32 1
store i32 %2, i32 *%a1
ret i32 %1
}
define i64 @test_pextrq(<2 x i64> %a0, <2 x i64> %a1, i64 *%a2) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_pextrq:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: pextrq $1, %xmm0, %rax # sched: [3:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: pextrq $1, %xmm0, (%rdi) # sched: [5:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_pextrq:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: pextrq $1, %xmm0, %rax # sched: [1:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: pextrq $1, %xmm0, (%rdi) # sched: [4:2.00]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_pextrq:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vpextrq $1, %xmm0, %rax # sched: [3:1.00]
; SANDY-NEXT: vpextrq $1, %xmm0, (%rdi) # sched: [5:1.00]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_pextrq:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpextrq $1, %xmm0, %rax # sched: [1:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpextrq $1, %xmm0, (%rdi) # sched: [5:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_pextrq:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpextrq $1, %xmm0, %rax # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpextrq $1, %xmm0, (%rdi) # sched: [6:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_pextrq:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpextrq $1, %xmm0, %rax # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpextrq $1, %xmm0, (%rdi) # sched: [8:1.00]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = extractelement <2 x i64> %a0, i32 1
%2 = extractelement <2 x i64> %a0, i32 1
store i64 %2, i64 *%a2
ret i64 %1
}
define i32 @test_pextrw(<8 x i16> %a0, i16 *%a1) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_pextrw:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: pextrw $3, %xmm0, %eax # sched: [3:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: pextrw $1, %xmm0, (%rdi) # sched: [5:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_pextrw:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: pextrw $3, %xmm0, %eax # sched: [4:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: pextrw $1, %xmm0, (%rdi) # sched: [4:2.00]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_pextrw:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vpextrw $3, %xmm0, %eax # sched: [3:1.00]
; SANDY-NEXT: vpextrw $1, %xmm0, (%rdi) # sched: [5:1.00]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_pextrw:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpextrw $3, %xmm0, %eax # sched: [1:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpextrw $1, %xmm0, (%rdi) # sched: [5:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_pextrw:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpextrw $3, %xmm0, %eax # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpextrw $1, %xmm0, (%rdi) # sched: [6:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_pextrw:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpextrw $3, %xmm0, %eax # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpextrw $1, %xmm0, (%rdi) # sched: [8:1.00]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = extractelement <8 x i16> %a0, i32 3
%2 = extractelement <8 x i16> %a0, i32 1
store i16 %2, i16 *%a1
%3 = zext i16 %1 to i32
ret i32 %3
}
define <8 x i16> @test_phminposuw(<8 x i16> *%a0) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_phminposuw:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: phminposuw (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [11:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: phminposuw %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_phminposuw:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: phminposuw (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [7:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: phminposuw %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [4:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_phminposuw:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vphminposuw (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [11:1.00]
; SANDY-NEXT: vphminposuw %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_phminposuw:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vphminposuw (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [9:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vphminposuw %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_phminposuw:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vphminposuw (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [7:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vphminposuw %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [2:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_phminposuw:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vphminposuw (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [11:1.00]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vphminposuw %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [4:1.00]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = load <8 x i16>, <8 x i16> *%a0, align 16
%2 = call <8 x i16> @llvm.x86.sse41.phminposuw(<8 x i16> %1)
%3 = call <8 x i16> @llvm.x86.sse41.phminposuw(<8 x i16> %2)
ret <8 x i16> %3
}
declare <8 x i16> @llvm.x86.sse41.phminposuw(<8 x i16>) nounwind readnone
define <16 x i8> @test_pinsrb(<16 x i8> %a0, i8 %a1, i8 *%a2) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_pinsrb:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: pinsrb $1, %edi, %xmm0 # sched: [2:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: pinsrb $3, (%rsi), %xmm0 # sched: [7:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_pinsrb:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: pinsrb $1, %edi, %xmm0 # sched: [1:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: pinsrb $3, (%rsi), %xmm0 # sched: [4:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_pinsrb:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vpinsrb $1, %edi, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [2:1.00]
; SANDY-NEXT: vpinsrb $3, (%rsi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [7:0.50]
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_pinsrb:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpinsrb $1, %edi, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpinsrb $3, (%rsi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_pinsrb:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpinsrb $1, %edi, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpinsrb $3, (%rsi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [6:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_pinsrb:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpinsrb $1, %edi, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpinsrb $3, (%rsi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [8:0.50]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = insertelement <16 x i8> %a0, i8 %a1, i32 1
%2 = load i8, i8 *%a2
%3 = insertelement <16 x i8> %1, i8 %2, i32 3
ret <16 x i8> %3
}
define <4 x i32> @test_pinsrd(<4 x i32> %a0, i32 %a1, i32 *%a2) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_pinsrd:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: pinsrd $1, %edi, %xmm0 # sched: [2:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: pinsrd $3, (%rsi), %xmm0 # sched: [7:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_pinsrd:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: pinsrd $1, %edi, %xmm0 # sched: [1:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: pinsrd $3, (%rsi), %xmm0 # sched: [4:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_pinsrd:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vpinsrd $1, %edi, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [2:1.00]
; SANDY-NEXT: vpinsrd $3, (%rsi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [7:0.50]
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_pinsrd:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpinsrd $1, %edi, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpinsrd $3, (%rsi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_pinsrd:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpinsrd $1, %edi, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpinsrd $3, (%rsi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [6:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_pinsrd:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpinsrd $1, %edi, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpinsrd $3, (%rsi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [8:0.50]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = insertelement <4 x i32> %a0, i32 %a1, i32 1
%2 = load i32, i32 *%a2
%3 = insertelement <4 x i32> %1, i32 %2, i32 3
ret <4 x i32> %3
}
define <2 x i64> @test_pinsrq(<2 x i64> %a0, <2 x i64> %a1, i64 %a2, i64 *%a3) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_pinsrq:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: pinsrq $1, %rdi, %xmm0 # sched: [2:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: pinsrq $1, (%rsi), %xmm1 # sched: [7:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: paddq %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_pinsrq:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: pinsrq $1, (%rsi), %xmm1 # sched: [4:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: pinsrq $1, %rdi, %xmm0 # sched: [1:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: paddq %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_pinsrq:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vpinsrq $1, %rdi, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [2:1.00]
; SANDY-NEXT: vpinsrq $1, (%rsi), %xmm1, %xmm1 # sched: [7:0.50]
; SANDY-NEXT: vpaddq %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_pinsrq:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpinsrq $1, %rdi, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpinsrq $1, (%rsi), %xmm1, %xmm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpaddq %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_pinsrq:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpinsrq $1, (%rsi), %xmm1, %xmm1 # sched: [6:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpinsrq $1, %rdi, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpaddq %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_pinsrq:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpinsrq $1, (%rsi), %xmm1, %xmm1 # sched: [8:0.50]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpinsrq $1, %rdi, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpaddq %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = insertelement <2 x i64> %a0, i64 %a2, i32 1
%2 = load i64, i64 *%a3
%3 = insertelement <2 x i64> %a1, i64 %2, i32 1
%4 = add <2 x i64> %1, %3
ret <2 x i64> %4
}
define <16 x i8> @test_pmaxsb(<16 x i8> %a0, <16 x i8> %a1, <16 x i8> *%a2) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_pmaxsb:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: pmaxsb %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: pmaxsb (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [7:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_pmaxsb:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: pmaxsb %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: pmaxsb (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [4:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_pmaxsb:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
; SANDY-NEXT: vpmaxsb %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vpmaxsb (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [7:0.50]
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_pmaxsb:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpmaxsb %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpmaxsb (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_pmaxsb:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpmaxsb %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpmaxsb (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [6:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_pmaxsb:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpmaxsb %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpmaxsb (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [8:0.50]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = call <16 x i8> @llvm.x86.sse41.pmaxsb(<16 x i8> %a0, <16 x i8> %a1)
%2 = load <16 x i8>, <16 x i8> *%a2, align 16
%3 = call <16 x i8> @llvm.x86.sse41.pmaxsb(<16 x i8> %1, <16 x i8> %2)
ret <16 x i8> %3
}
declare <16 x i8> @llvm.x86.sse41.pmaxsb(<16 x i8>, <16 x i8>) nounwind readnone
define <4 x i32> @test_pmaxsd(<4 x i32> %a0, <4 x i32> %a1, <4 x i32> *%a2) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_pmaxsd:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: pmaxsd %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: pmaxsd (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [7:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_pmaxsd:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: pmaxsd %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: pmaxsd (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [4:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_pmaxsd:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
; SANDY-NEXT: vpmaxsd %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vpmaxsd (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [7:0.50]
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_pmaxsd:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpmaxsd %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpmaxsd (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_pmaxsd:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpmaxsd %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpmaxsd (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [6:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_pmaxsd:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpmaxsd %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpmaxsd (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [8:0.50]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = call <4 x i32> @llvm.x86.sse41.pmaxsd(<4 x i32> %a0, <4 x i32> %a1)
%2 = load <4 x i32>, <4 x i32> *%a2, align 16
%3 = call <4 x i32> @llvm.x86.sse41.pmaxsd(<4 x i32> %1, <4 x i32> %2)
ret <4 x i32> %3
}
declare <4 x i32> @llvm.x86.sse41.pmaxsd(<4 x i32>, <4 x i32>) nounwind readnone
define <4 x i32> @test_pmaxud(<4 x i32> %a0, <4 x i32> %a1, <4 x i32> *%a2) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_pmaxud:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: pmaxud %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: pmaxud (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [7:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_pmaxud:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: pmaxud %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: pmaxud (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [4:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_pmaxud:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
; SANDY-NEXT: vpmaxud %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vpmaxud (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [7:0.50]
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_pmaxud:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpmaxud %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpmaxud (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_pmaxud:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpmaxud %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpmaxud (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [6:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_pmaxud:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpmaxud %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpmaxud (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [8:0.50]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = call <4 x i32> @llvm.x86.sse41.pmaxud(<4 x i32> %a0, <4 x i32> %a1)
%2 = load <4 x i32>, <4 x i32> *%a2, align 16
%3 = call <4 x i32> @llvm.x86.sse41.pmaxud(<4 x i32> %1, <4 x i32> %2)
ret <4 x i32> %3
}
declare <4 x i32> @llvm.x86.sse41.pmaxud(<4 x i32>, <4 x i32>) nounwind readnone
define <8 x i16> @test_pmaxuw(<8 x i16> %a0, <8 x i16> %a1, <8 x i16> *%a2) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_pmaxuw:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: pmaxuw %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: pmaxuw (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [7:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_pmaxuw:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: pmaxuw %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: pmaxuw (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [4:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_pmaxuw:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
; SANDY-NEXT: vpmaxuw %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vpmaxuw (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [7:0.50]
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_pmaxuw:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpmaxuw %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpmaxuw (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_pmaxuw:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpmaxuw %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpmaxuw (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [6:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_pmaxuw:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpmaxuw %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpmaxuw (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [8:0.50]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = call <8 x i16> @llvm.x86.sse41.pmaxuw(<8 x i16> %a0, <8 x i16> %a1)
%2 = load <8 x i16>, <8 x i16> *%a2, align 16
%3 = call <8 x i16> @llvm.x86.sse41.pmaxuw(<8 x i16> %1, <8 x i16> %2)
ret <8 x i16> %3
}
declare <8 x i16> @llvm.x86.sse41.pmaxuw(<8 x i16>, <8 x i16>) nounwind readnone
define <16 x i8> @test_pminsb(<16 x i8> %a0, <16 x i8> %a1, <16 x i8> *%a2) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_pminsb:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: pminsb %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: pminsb (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [7:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_pminsb:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: pminsb %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: pminsb (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [4:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_pminsb:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
; SANDY-NEXT: vpminsb %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vpminsb (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [7:0.50]
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_pminsb:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpminsb %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpminsb (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_pminsb:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpminsb %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpminsb (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [6:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_pminsb:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpminsb %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpminsb (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [8:0.50]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = call <16 x i8> @llvm.x86.sse41.pminsb(<16 x i8> %a0, <16 x i8> %a1)
%2 = load <16 x i8>, <16 x i8> *%a2, align 16
%3 = call <16 x i8> @llvm.x86.sse41.pminsb(<16 x i8> %1, <16 x i8> %2)
ret <16 x i8> %3
}
declare <16 x i8> @llvm.x86.sse41.pminsb(<16 x i8>, <16 x i8>) nounwind readnone
define <4 x i32> @test_pminsd(<4 x i32> %a0, <4 x i32> %a1, <4 x i32> *%a2) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_pminsd:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: pminsd %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: pminsd (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [7:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_pminsd:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: pminsd %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: pminsd (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [4:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_pminsd:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
; SANDY-NEXT: vpminsd %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vpminsd (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [7:0.50]
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_pminsd:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpminsd %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpminsd (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_pminsd:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpminsd %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpminsd (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [6:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_pminsd:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpminsd %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpminsd (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [8:0.50]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = call <4 x i32> @llvm.x86.sse41.pminsd(<4 x i32> %a0, <4 x i32> %a1)
%2 = load <4 x i32>, <4 x i32> *%a2, align 16
%3 = call <4 x i32> @llvm.x86.sse41.pminsd(<4 x i32> %1, <4 x i32> %2)
ret <4 x i32> %3
}
declare <4 x i32> @llvm.x86.sse41.pminsd(<4 x i32>, <4 x i32>) nounwind readnone
define <4 x i32> @test_pminud(<4 x i32> %a0, <4 x i32> %a1, <4 x i32> *%a2) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_pminud:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: pminud %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: pminud (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [7:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_pminud:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: pminud %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: pminud (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [4:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_pminud:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
; SANDY-NEXT: vpminud %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vpminud (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [7:0.50]
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_pminud:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpminud %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpminud (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_pminud:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpminud %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpminud (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [6:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_pminud:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpminud %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpminud (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [8:0.50]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = call <4 x i32> @llvm.x86.sse41.pminud(<4 x i32> %a0, <4 x i32> %a1)
%2 = load <4 x i32>, <4 x i32> *%a2, align 16
%3 = call <4 x i32> @llvm.x86.sse41.pminud(<4 x i32> %1, <4 x i32> %2)
ret <4 x i32> %3
}
declare <4 x i32> @llvm.x86.sse41.pminud(<4 x i32>, <4 x i32>) nounwind readnone
define <8 x i16> @test_pminuw(<8 x i16> %a0, <8 x i16> %a1, <8 x i16> *%a2) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_pminuw:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: pminuw %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: pminuw (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [7:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_pminuw:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: pminuw %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: pminuw (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [4:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_pminuw:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
; SANDY-NEXT: vpminuw %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vpminuw (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [7:0.50]
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_pminuw:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpminuw %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpminuw (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_pminuw:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpminuw %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpminuw (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [6:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_pminuw:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpminuw %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpminuw (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [8:0.50]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = call <8 x i16> @llvm.x86.sse41.pminuw(<8 x i16> %a0, <8 x i16> %a1)
%2 = load <8 x i16>, <8 x i16> *%a2, align 16
%3 = call <8 x i16> @llvm.x86.sse41.pminuw(<8 x i16> %1, <8 x i16> %2)
ret <8 x i16> %3
}
declare <8 x i16> @llvm.x86.sse41.pminuw(<8 x i16>, <8 x i16>) nounwind readnone
define <8 x i16> @test_pmovsxbw(<16 x i8> %a0, <8 x i8> *%a1) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_pmovsxbw:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [1:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: pmovsxbw (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [7:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: paddw %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_pmovsxbw:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: pmovsxbw (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [4:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: pmovsxbw %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: paddw %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: movdqa %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_pmovsxbw:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
; SANDY-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vpmovsxbw (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [7:0.50]
; SANDY-NEXT: vpaddw %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_pmovsxbw:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpmovsxbw (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpaddw %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_pmovsxbw:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpmovsxbw (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [6:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpaddw %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_pmovsxbw:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpmovsxbw (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [8:0.50]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpmovsxbw %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpaddw %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = shufflevector <16 x i8> %a0, <16 x i8> undef, <8 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1, i32 2, i32 3, i32 4, i32 5, i32 6, i32 7>
%2 = sext <8 x i8> %1 to <8 x i16>
%3 = load <8 x i8>, <8 x i8>* %a1, align 1
%4 = sext <8 x i8> %3 to <8 x i16>
%5 = add <8 x i16> %2, %4
ret <8 x i16> %5
}
define <4 x i32> @test_pmovsxbd(<16 x i8> %a0, <4 x i8> *%a1) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_pmovsxbd:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: pmovsxbd %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [1:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: pmovsxbd (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [7:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: paddd %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_pmovsxbd:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: pmovsxbd (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [4:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: pmovsxbd %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: paddd %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: movdqa %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_pmovsxbd:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
; SANDY-NEXT: vpmovsxbd %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vpmovsxbd (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [7:0.50]
; SANDY-NEXT: vpaddd %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_pmovsxbd:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpmovsxbd %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpmovsxbd (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpaddd %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_pmovsxbd:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpmovsxbd (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [6:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpmovsxbd %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpaddd %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_pmovsxbd:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpmovsxbd (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [8:0.50]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpmovsxbd %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpaddd %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = shufflevector <16 x i8> %a0, <16 x i8> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1, i32 2, i32 3>
%2 = sext <4 x i8> %1 to <4 x i32>
%3 = load <4 x i8>, <4 x i8>* %a1, align 1
%4 = sext <4 x i8> %3 to <4 x i32>
%5 = add <4 x i32> %2, %4
ret <4 x i32> %5
}
define <2 x i64> @test_pmovsxbq(<16 x i8> %a0, <2 x i8> *%a1) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_pmovsxbq:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: pmovsxbq %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [1:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: pmovsxbq (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [7:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: paddq %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_pmovsxbq:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: pmovsxbq (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [4:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: pmovsxbq %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: paddq %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: movdqa %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_pmovsxbq:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
; SANDY-NEXT: vpmovsxbq %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vpmovsxbq (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [7:0.50]
; SANDY-NEXT: vpaddq %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_pmovsxbq:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpmovsxbq %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpmovsxbq (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpaddq %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_pmovsxbq:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpmovsxbq (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [6:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpmovsxbq %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpaddq %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_pmovsxbq:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpmovsxbq (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [8:0.50]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpmovsxbq %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpaddq %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = shufflevector <16 x i8> %a0, <16 x i8> undef, <2 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1>
%2 = sext <2 x i8> %1 to <2 x i64>
%3 = load <2 x i8>, <2 x i8>* %a1, align 1
%4 = sext <2 x i8> %3 to <2 x i64>
%5 = add <2 x i64> %2, %4
ret <2 x i64> %5
}
define <2 x i64> @test_pmovsxdq(<4 x i32> %a0, <2 x i32> *%a1) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_pmovsxdq:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: pmovsxdq %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [1:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: pmovsxdq (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [7:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: paddq %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_pmovsxdq:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: pmovsxdq (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [4:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: pmovsxdq %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: paddq %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: movdqa %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_pmovsxdq:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
; SANDY-NEXT: vpmovsxdq %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vpmovsxdq (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [7:0.50]
; SANDY-NEXT: vpaddq %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_pmovsxdq:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpmovsxdq %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpmovsxdq (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpaddq %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_pmovsxdq:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpmovsxdq (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [6:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpmovsxdq %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpaddq %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_pmovsxdq:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpmovsxdq (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [8:0.50]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpmovsxdq %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpaddq %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = shufflevector <4 x i32> %a0, <4 x i32> undef, <2 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1>
%2 = sext <2 x i32> %1 to <2 x i64>
%3 = load <2 x i32>, <2 x i32>* %a1, align 1
%4 = sext <2 x i32> %3 to <2 x i64>
%5 = add <2 x i64> %2, %4
ret <2 x i64> %5
}
define <4 x i32> @test_pmovsxwd(<8 x i16> %a0, <4 x i16> *%a1) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_pmovsxwd:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: pmovsxwd %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [1:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: pmovsxwd (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [7:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: paddd %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_pmovsxwd:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: pmovsxwd (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [4:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: pmovsxwd %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: paddd %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: movdqa %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_pmovsxwd:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
; SANDY-NEXT: vpmovsxwd %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vpmovsxwd (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [7:0.50]
; SANDY-NEXT: vpaddd %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_pmovsxwd:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpmovsxwd %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpmovsxwd (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpaddd %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_pmovsxwd:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpmovsxwd (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [6:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpmovsxwd %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpaddd %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_pmovsxwd:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpmovsxwd (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [8:0.50]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpmovsxwd %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpaddd %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = shufflevector <8 x i16> %a0, <8 x i16> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1, i32 2, i32 3>
%2 = sext <4 x i16> %1 to <4 x i32>
%3 = load <4 x i16>, <4 x i16>* %a1, align 1
%4 = sext <4 x i16> %3 to <4 x i32>
%5 = add <4 x i32> %2, %4
ret <4 x i32> %5
}
define <2 x i64> @test_pmovsxwq(<8 x i16> %a0, <2 x i16> *%a1) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_pmovsxwq:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: pmovsxwq %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [1:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: pmovsxwq (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [7:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: paddq %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_pmovsxwq:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: pmovsxwq (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [4:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: pmovsxwq %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: paddq %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: movdqa %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_pmovsxwq:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
; SANDY-NEXT: vpmovsxwq %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vpmovsxwq (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [7:0.50]
; SANDY-NEXT: vpaddq %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_pmovsxwq:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpmovsxwq %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpmovsxwq (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpaddq %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_pmovsxwq:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpmovsxwq (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [6:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpmovsxwq %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpaddq %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_pmovsxwq:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpmovsxwq (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [8:0.50]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpmovsxwq %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpaddq %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = shufflevector <8 x i16> %a0, <8 x i16> undef, <2 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1>
%2 = sext <2 x i16> %1 to <2 x i64>
%3 = load <2 x i16>, <2 x i16>* %a1, align 1
%4 = sext <2 x i16> %3 to <2 x i64>
%5 = add <2 x i64> %2, %4
ret <2 x i64> %5
}
define <8 x i16> @test_pmovzxbw(<16 x i8> %a0, <8 x i8> *%a1) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_pmovzxbw:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: pmovzxbw {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm0[0],zero,xmm0[1],zero,xmm0[2],zero,xmm0[3],zero,xmm0[4],zero,xmm0[5],zero,xmm0[6],zero,xmm0[7],zero sched: [1:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: pmovzxbw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = mem[0],zero,mem[1],zero,mem[2],zero,mem[3],zero,mem[4],zero,mem[5],zero,mem[6],zero,mem[7],zero sched: [7:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: paddw %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_pmovzxbw:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: pmovzxbw {{.*#+}} xmm1 = mem[0],zero,mem[1],zero,mem[2],zero,mem[3],zero,mem[4],zero,mem[5],zero,mem[6],zero,mem[7],zero sched: [4:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: pmovzxbw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],zero,xmm0[1],zero,xmm0[2],zero,xmm0[3],zero,xmm0[4],zero,xmm0[5],zero,xmm0[6],zero,xmm0[7],zero sched: [1:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: paddw %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: movdqa %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_pmovzxbw:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
; SANDY-NEXT: vpmovzxbw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],zero,xmm0[1],zero,xmm0[2],zero,xmm0[3],zero,xmm0[4],zero,xmm0[5],zero,xmm0[6],zero,xmm0[7],zero sched: [1:0.50]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vpmovzxbw {{.*#+}} xmm1 = mem[0],zero,mem[1],zero,mem[2],zero,mem[3],zero,mem[4],zero,mem[5],zero,mem[6],zero,mem[7],zero sched: [7:0.50]
; SANDY-NEXT: vpaddw %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_pmovzxbw:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpmovzxbw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],zero,xmm0[1],zero,xmm0[2],zero,xmm0[3],zero,xmm0[4],zero,xmm0[5],zero,xmm0[6],zero,xmm0[7],zero sched: [1:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpmovzxbw {{.*#+}} xmm1 = mem[0],zero,mem[1],zero,mem[2],zero,mem[3],zero,mem[4],zero,mem[5],zero,mem[6],zero,mem[7],zero sched: [5:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpaddw %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_pmovzxbw:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpmovzxbw {{.*#+}} xmm1 = mem[0],zero,mem[1],zero,mem[2],zero,mem[3],zero,mem[4],zero,mem[5],zero,mem[6],zero,mem[7],zero sched: [6:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpmovzxbw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],zero,xmm0[1],zero,xmm0[2],zero,xmm0[3],zero,xmm0[4],zero,xmm0[5],zero,xmm0[6],zero,xmm0[7],zero sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpaddw %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_pmovzxbw:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpmovzxbw {{.*#+}} xmm1 = mem[0],zero,mem[1],zero,mem[2],zero,mem[3],zero,mem[4],zero,mem[5],zero,mem[6],zero,mem[7],zero sched: [8:0.50]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpmovzxbw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],zero,xmm0[1],zero,xmm0[2],zero,xmm0[3],zero,xmm0[4],zero,xmm0[5],zero,xmm0[6],zero,xmm0[7],zero sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpaddw %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = shufflevector <16 x i8> %a0, <16 x i8> undef, <8 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1, i32 2, i32 3, i32 4, i32 5, i32 6, i32 7>
%2 = zext <8 x i8> %1 to <8 x i16>
%3 = load <8 x i8>, <8 x i8>* %a1, align 1
%4 = zext <8 x i8> %3 to <8 x i16>
%5 = add <8 x i16> %2, %4
ret <8 x i16> %5
}
define <4 x i32> @test_pmovzxbd(<16 x i8> %a0, <4 x i8> *%a1) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_pmovzxbd:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: pmovzxbd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm0[0],zero,zero,zero,xmm0[1],zero,zero,zero,xmm0[2],zero,zero,zero,xmm0[3],zero,zero,zero sched: [1:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: pmovzxbd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero,mem[1],zero,zero,zero,mem[2],zero,zero,zero,mem[3],zero,zero,zero sched: [7:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: paddd %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_pmovzxbd:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: pmovzxbd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero,mem[1],zero,zero,zero,mem[2],zero,zero,zero,mem[3],zero,zero,zero sched: [4:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: pmovzxbd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],zero,zero,zero,xmm0[1],zero,zero,zero,xmm0[2],zero,zero,zero,xmm0[3],zero,zero,zero sched: [1:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: paddd %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: movdqa %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_pmovzxbd:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
; SANDY-NEXT: vpmovzxbd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],zero,zero,zero,xmm0[1],zero,zero,zero,xmm0[2],zero,zero,zero,xmm0[3],zero,zero,zero sched: [1:0.50]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vpmovzxbd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero,mem[1],zero,zero,zero,mem[2],zero,zero,zero,mem[3],zero,zero,zero sched: [7:0.50]
; SANDY-NEXT: vpaddd %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_pmovzxbd:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpmovzxbd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],zero,zero,zero,xmm0[1],zero,zero,zero,xmm0[2],zero,zero,zero,xmm0[3],zero,zero,zero sched: [1:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpmovzxbd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero,mem[1],zero,zero,zero,mem[2],zero,zero,zero,mem[3],zero,zero,zero sched: [5:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpaddd %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_pmovzxbd:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpmovzxbd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero,mem[1],zero,zero,zero,mem[2],zero,zero,zero,mem[3],zero,zero,zero sched: [6:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpmovzxbd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],zero,zero,zero,xmm0[1],zero,zero,zero,xmm0[2],zero,zero,zero,xmm0[3],zero,zero,zero sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpaddd %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_pmovzxbd:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpmovzxbd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero,mem[1],zero,zero,zero,mem[2],zero,zero,zero,mem[3],zero,zero,zero sched: [8:0.50]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpmovzxbd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],zero,zero,zero,xmm0[1],zero,zero,zero,xmm0[2],zero,zero,zero,xmm0[3],zero,zero,zero sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpaddd %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = shufflevector <16 x i8> %a0, <16 x i8> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1, i32 2, i32 3>
%2 = zext <4 x i8> %1 to <4 x i32>
%3 = load <4 x i8>, <4 x i8>* %a1, align 1
%4 = zext <4 x i8> %3 to <4 x i32>
%5 = add <4 x i32> %2, %4
ret <4 x i32> %5
}
define <2 x i64> @test_pmovzxbq(<16 x i8> %a0, <2 x i8> *%a1) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_pmovzxbq:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: pmovzxbq {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm0[0],zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,xmm0[1],zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero sched: [1:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: pmovzxbq {{.*#+}} xmm0 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,mem[1],zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero sched: [7:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: paddq %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_pmovzxbq:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: pmovzxbq {{.*#+}} xmm1 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,mem[1],zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero sched: [4:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: pmovzxbq {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,xmm0[1],zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero sched: [1:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: paddq %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: movdqa %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_pmovzxbq:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
; SANDY-NEXT: vpmovzxbq {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,xmm0[1],zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero sched: [1:0.50]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vpmovzxbq {{.*#+}} xmm1 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,mem[1],zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero sched: [7:0.50]
; SANDY-NEXT: vpaddq %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_pmovzxbq:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpmovzxbq {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,xmm0[1],zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero sched: [1:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpmovzxbq {{.*#+}} xmm1 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,mem[1],zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero sched: [5:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpaddq %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_pmovzxbq:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpmovzxbq {{.*#+}} xmm1 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,mem[1],zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero sched: [6:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpmovzxbq {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,xmm0[1],zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpaddq %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_pmovzxbq:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpmovzxbq {{.*#+}} xmm1 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,mem[1],zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero sched: [8:0.50]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpmovzxbq {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,xmm0[1],zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero,zero sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpaddq %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = shufflevector <16 x i8> %a0, <16 x i8> undef, <2 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1>
%2 = zext <2 x i8> %1 to <2 x i64>
%3 = load <2 x i8>, <2 x i8>* %a1, align 1
%4 = zext <2 x i8> %3 to <2 x i64>
%5 = add <2 x i64> %2, %4
ret <2 x i64> %5
}
define <2 x i64> @test_pmovzxdq(<4 x i32> %a0, <2 x i32> *%a1) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_pmovzxdq:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: pmovzxdq {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm0[0],zero,xmm0[1],zero sched: [1:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: pmovzxdq {{.*#+}} xmm0 = mem[0],zero,mem[1],zero sched: [7:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: paddq %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_pmovzxdq:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: pmovzxdq {{.*#+}} xmm1 = mem[0],zero,mem[1],zero sched: [4:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: pmovzxdq {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],zero,xmm0[1],zero sched: [1:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: paddq %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: movdqa %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_pmovzxdq:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
; SANDY-NEXT: vpmovzxdq {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],zero,xmm0[1],zero sched: [1:0.50]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vpmovzxdq {{.*#+}} xmm1 = mem[0],zero,mem[1],zero sched: [7:0.50]
; SANDY-NEXT: vpaddq %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_pmovzxdq:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpmovzxdq {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],zero,xmm0[1],zero sched: [1:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpmovzxdq {{.*#+}} xmm1 = mem[0],zero,mem[1],zero sched: [5:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpaddq %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_pmovzxdq:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpmovzxdq {{.*#+}} xmm1 = mem[0],zero,mem[1],zero sched: [6:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpmovzxdq {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],zero,xmm0[1],zero sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpaddq %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_pmovzxdq:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpmovzxdq {{.*#+}} xmm1 = mem[0],zero,mem[1],zero sched: [8:0.50]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpmovzxdq {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],zero,xmm0[1],zero sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpaddq %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = shufflevector <4 x i32> %a0, <4 x i32> undef, <2 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1>
%2 = zext <2 x i32> %1 to <2 x i64>
%3 = load <2 x i32>, <2 x i32>* %a1, align 1
%4 = zext <2 x i32> %3 to <2 x i64>
%5 = add <2 x i64> %2, %4
ret <2 x i64> %5
}
define <4 x i32> @test_pmovzxwd(<8 x i16> %a0, <4 x i16> *%a1) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_pmovzxwd:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: pmovzxwd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm0[0],zero,xmm0[1],zero,xmm0[2],zero,xmm0[3],zero sched: [1:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: pmovzxwd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = mem[0],zero,mem[1],zero,mem[2],zero,mem[3],zero sched: [7:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: paddd %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_pmovzxwd:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: pmovzxwd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = mem[0],zero,mem[1],zero,mem[2],zero,mem[3],zero sched: [4:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: pmovzxwd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],zero,xmm0[1],zero,xmm0[2],zero,xmm0[3],zero sched: [1:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: paddd %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: movdqa %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_pmovzxwd:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
; SANDY-NEXT: vpmovzxwd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],zero,xmm0[1],zero,xmm0[2],zero,xmm0[3],zero sched: [1:0.50]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vpmovzxwd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = mem[0],zero,mem[1],zero,mem[2],zero,mem[3],zero sched: [7:0.50]
; SANDY-NEXT: vpaddd %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_pmovzxwd:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpmovzxwd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],zero,xmm0[1],zero,xmm0[2],zero,xmm0[3],zero sched: [1:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpmovzxwd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = mem[0],zero,mem[1],zero,mem[2],zero,mem[3],zero sched: [5:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpaddd %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_pmovzxwd:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpmovzxwd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = mem[0],zero,mem[1],zero,mem[2],zero,mem[3],zero sched: [6:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpmovzxwd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],zero,xmm0[1],zero,xmm0[2],zero,xmm0[3],zero sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpaddd %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_pmovzxwd:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpmovzxwd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = mem[0],zero,mem[1],zero,mem[2],zero,mem[3],zero sched: [8:0.50]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpmovzxwd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],zero,xmm0[1],zero,xmm0[2],zero,xmm0[3],zero sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpaddd %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = shufflevector <8 x i16> %a0, <8 x i16> undef, <4 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1, i32 2, i32 3>
%2 = zext <4 x i16> %1 to <4 x i32>
%3 = load <4 x i16>, <4 x i16>* %a1, align 1
%4 = zext <4 x i16> %3 to <4 x i32>
%5 = add <4 x i32> %2, %4
ret <4 x i32> %5
}
define <2 x i64> @test_pmovzxwq(<8 x i16> %a0, <2 x i16> *%a1) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_pmovzxwq:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: pmovzxwq {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm0[0],zero,zero,zero,xmm0[1],zero,zero,zero sched: [1:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: pmovzxwq {{.*#+}} xmm0 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero,mem[1],zero,zero,zero sched: [7:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: paddq %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_pmovzxwq:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: pmovzxwq {{.*#+}} xmm1 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero,mem[1],zero,zero,zero sched: [4:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: pmovzxwq {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],zero,zero,zero,xmm0[1],zero,zero,zero sched: [1:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: paddq %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: movdqa %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_pmovzxwq:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
; SANDY-NEXT: vpmovzxwq {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],zero,zero,zero,xmm0[1],zero,zero,zero sched: [1:0.50]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vpmovzxwq {{.*#+}} xmm1 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero,mem[1],zero,zero,zero sched: [7:0.50]
; SANDY-NEXT: vpaddq %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_pmovzxwq:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpmovzxwq {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],zero,zero,zero,xmm0[1],zero,zero,zero sched: [1:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpmovzxwq {{.*#+}} xmm1 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero,mem[1],zero,zero,zero sched: [5:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpaddq %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_pmovzxwq:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpmovzxwq {{.*#+}} xmm1 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero,mem[1],zero,zero,zero sched: [6:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpmovzxwq {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],zero,zero,zero,xmm0[1],zero,zero,zero sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpaddq %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_pmovzxwq:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpmovzxwq {{.*#+}} xmm1 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero,mem[1],zero,zero,zero sched: [8:0.50]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpmovzxwq {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0],zero,zero,zero,xmm0[1],zero,zero,zero sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpaddq %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = shufflevector <8 x i16> %a0, <8 x i16> undef, <2 x i32> <i32 0, i32 1>
%2 = zext <2 x i16> %1 to <2 x i64>
%3 = load <2 x i16>, <2 x i16>* %a1, align 1
%4 = zext <2 x i16> %3 to <2 x i64>
%5 = add <2 x i64> %2, %4
ret <2 x i64> %5
}
define <2 x i64> @test_pmuldq(<4 x i32> %a0, <4 x i32> %a1, <4 x i32> *%a2) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_pmuldq:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: pmuldq %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: pmuldq (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [9:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_pmuldq:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: pmuldq %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [4:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: pmuldq (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [7:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_pmuldq:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vpmuldq %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; SANDY-NEXT: vpmuldq (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [9:1.00]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_pmuldq:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpmuldq %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpmuldq (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [9:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_pmuldq:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpmuldq %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [2:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpmuldq (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [7:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_pmuldq:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpmuldq %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [4:1.00]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpmuldq (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [11:1.00]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = call <2 x i64> @llvm.x86.sse41.pmuldq(<4 x i32> %a0, <4 x i32> %a1)
%2 = bitcast <2 x i64> %1 to <4 x i32>
%3 = load <4 x i32>, <4 x i32> *%a2, align 16
%4 = call <2 x i64> @llvm.x86.sse41.pmuldq(<4 x i32> %2, <4 x i32> %3)
ret <2 x i64> %4
}
declare <2 x i64> @llvm.x86.sse41.pmuldq(<4 x i32>, <4 x i32>) nounwind readnone
define <4 x i32> @test_pmulld(<4 x i32> %a0, <4 x i32> %a1, <4 x i32> *%a2) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_pmulld:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: pmulld %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: pmulld (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [9:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_pmulld:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: pmulld %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [4:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: pmulld (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [7:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_pmulld:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vpmulld %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; SANDY-NEXT: vpmulld (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [9:1.00]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_pmulld:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpmulld %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [10:2.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vpmulld (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [10:2.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_pmulld:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpmulld %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [2:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vpmulld (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [7:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_pmulld:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpmulld %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [4:1.00]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vpmulld (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [11:1.00]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = mul <4 x i32> %a0, %a1
%2 = load <4 x i32>, <4 x i32> *%a2, align 16
%3 = mul <4 x i32> %1, %2
ret <4 x i32> %3
}
define i32 @test_ptest(<2 x i64> %a0, <2 x i64> %a1, <2 x i64> *%a2) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_ptest:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: ptest %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [2:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: setb %al # sched: [1:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: ptest (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [8:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: setb %cl # sched: [1:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: andb %al, %cl # sched: [1:0.33]
; GENERIC-NEXT: movzbl %cl, %eax # sched: [1:0.33]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_ptest:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: ptest %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: setb %al # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: ptest (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [4:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: setb %cl # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: andb %al, %cl # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: movzbl %cl, %eax # sched: [1:0.50]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_ptest:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vptest %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [2:1.00]
; SANDY-NEXT: setb %al # sched: [1:1.00]
; SANDY-NEXT: vptest (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [8:1.00]
; SANDY-NEXT: setb %cl # sched: [1:1.00]
; SANDY-NEXT: andb %al, %cl # sched: [1:0.33]
; SANDY-NEXT: movzbl %cl, %eax # sched: [1:0.33]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_ptest:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vptest %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [2:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: setb %al # sched: [1:0.50]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vptest (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [2:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: setb %cl # sched: [1:0.50]
; HASWELL-NEXT: andb %al, %cl # sched: [1:0.25]
; HASWELL-NEXT: movzbl %cl, %eax # sched: [1:0.25]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_ptest:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vptest %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: setb %al # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vptest (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [6:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: setb %cl # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: andb %al, %cl # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: movzbl %cl, %eax # sched: [1:0.50]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_ptest:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vptest %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: setb %al # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vptest (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [8:0.50]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: setb %cl # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: andb %al, %cl # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: movzbl %cl, %eax # sched: [1:0.25]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = call i32 @llvm.x86.sse41.ptestc(<2 x i64> %a0, <2 x i64> %a1)
%2 = load <2 x i64>, <2 x i64> *%a2, align 16
%3 = call i32 @llvm.x86.sse41.ptestc(<2 x i64> %a0, <2 x i64> %2)
%4 = and i32 %1, %3
ret i32 %4
}
declare i32 @llvm.x86.sse41.ptestc(<2 x i64>, <2 x i64>) nounwind readnone
define <2 x double> @test_roundpd(<2 x double> %a0, <2 x double> *%a1) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_roundpd:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: roundpd $7, %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [3:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: roundpd $7, (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [9:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: addpd %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_roundpd:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: roundpd $7, (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [6:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: roundpd $7, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: addpd %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [3:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: movapd %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_roundpd:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
; SANDY-NEXT: vroundpd $7, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vroundpd $7, (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [9:1.00]
; SANDY-NEXT: vaddpd %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_roundpd:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vroundpd $7, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [6:2.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vroundpd $7, (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [10:2.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vaddpd %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_roundpd:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vroundpd $7, (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [8:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vroundpd $7, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vaddpd %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_roundpd:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vroundpd $7, (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [10:1.00]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vroundpd $7, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vaddpd %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = call <2 x double> @llvm.x86.sse41.round.pd(<2 x double> %a0, i32 7)
%2 = load <2 x double>, <2 x double> *%a1, align 16
%3 = call <2 x double> @llvm.x86.sse41.round.pd(<2 x double> %2, i32 7)
%4 = fadd <2 x double> %1, %3
ret <2 x double> %4
}
declare <2 x double> @llvm.x86.sse41.round.pd(<2 x double>, i32) nounwind readnone
define <4 x float> @test_roundps(<4 x float> %a0, <4 x float> *%a1) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_roundps:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: roundps $7, %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [3:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: roundps $7, (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [9:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: addps %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_roundps:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: roundps $7, (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [6:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: roundps $7, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: addps %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [3:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: movaps %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [1:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_roundps:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
; SANDY-NEXT: vroundps $7, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vroundps $7, (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [9:1.00]
; SANDY-NEXT: vaddps %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_roundps:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vroundps $7, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [6:2.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vroundps $7, (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [10:2.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vaddps %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_roundps:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vroundps $7, (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [8:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vroundps $7, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vaddps %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_roundps:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vroundps $7, (%rdi), %xmm1 # sched: [10:1.00]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vroundps $7, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vaddps %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = call <4 x float> @llvm.x86.sse41.round.ps(<4 x float> %a0, i32 7)
%2 = load <4 x float>, <4 x float> *%a1, align 16
%3 = call <4 x float> @llvm.x86.sse41.round.ps(<4 x float> %2, i32 7)
%4 = fadd <4 x float> %1, %3
ret <4 x float> %4
}
declare <4 x float> @llvm.x86.sse41.round.ps(<4 x float>, i32) nounwind readnone
define <2 x double> @test_roundsd(<2 x double> %a0, <2 x double> %a1, <2 x double> *%a2) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_roundsd:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: movaps %xmm0, %xmm2 # sched: [1:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: roundsd $7, %xmm1, %xmm2 # sched: [3:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: roundsd $7, (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [9:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: addpd %xmm2, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_roundsd:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: movaps %xmm0, %xmm2 # sched: [1:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: roundsd $7, (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [6:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: roundsd $7, %xmm1, %xmm2 # sched: [3:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: addpd %xmm2, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_roundsd:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
; SANDY-NEXT: vroundsd $7, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [3:1.00]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vroundsd $7, (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [9:1.00]
; SANDY-NEXT: vaddpd %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_roundsd:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vroundsd $7, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [6:2.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vroundsd $7, (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [10:2.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vaddpd %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_roundsd:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vroundsd $7, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [3:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vroundsd $7, (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [8:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vaddpd %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_roundsd:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vroundsd $7, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [3:1.00]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vroundsd $7, (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [10:1.00]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vaddpd %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = call <2 x double> @llvm.x86.sse41.round.sd(<2 x double> %a0, <2 x double> %a1, i32 7)
%2 = load <2 x double>, <2 x double>* %a2, align 16
%3 = call <2 x double> @llvm.x86.sse41.round.sd(<2 x double> %a0, <2 x double> %2, i32 7)
%4 = fadd <2 x double> %1, %3
ret <2 x double> %4
}
declare <2 x double> @llvm.x86.sse41.round.sd(<2 x double>, <2 x double>, i32) nounwind readnone
define <4 x float> @test_roundss(<4 x float> %a0, <4 x float> %a1, <4 x float> *%a2) {
; GENERIC-LABEL: test_roundss:
; GENERIC: # BB#0:
; GENERIC-NEXT: movaps %xmm0, %xmm2 # sched: [1:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: roundss $7, %xmm1, %xmm2 # sched: [3:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: roundss $7, (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [9:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: addps %xmm2, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; GENERIC-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; SLM-LABEL: test_roundss:
; SLM: # BB#0:
; SLM-NEXT: movaps %xmm0, %xmm2 # sched: [1:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: roundss $7, (%rdi), %xmm0 # sched: [6:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: roundss $7, %xmm1, %xmm2 # sched: [3:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: addps %xmm2, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; SLM-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; SANDY-LABEL: test_roundss:
; SANDY: # BB#0:
; SANDY-NEXT: vroundss $7, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [3:1.00]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: vroundss $7, (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [9:1.00]
; SANDY-NEXT: vaddps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target. The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information. Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB. Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX. The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details: •static latency of the instruction •number of uOps from which the instruction consists of •all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5: def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> { let Latency = 9; let NumMicroOps = 6; let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1]; } def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>; def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>; Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script. Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691 llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; HASWELL-LABEL: test_roundss:
; HASWELL: # BB#0:
; HASWELL-NEXT: vroundss $7, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [6:2.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vroundss $7, (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [10:2.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: vaddps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
;
; BTVER2-LABEL: test_roundss:
; BTVER2: # BB#0:
; BTVER2-NEXT: vroundss $7, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [3:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vroundss $7, (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [8:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: vaddps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
;
; ZNVER1-LABEL: test_roundss:
; ZNVER1: # BB#0:
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vroundss $7, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [3:1.00]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vroundss $7, (%rdi), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [10:1.00]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: vaddps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
; ZNVER1-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:0.50]
%1 = call <4 x float> @llvm.x86.sse41.round.ss(<4 x float> %a0, <4 x float> %a1, i32 7)
%2 = load <4 x float>, <4 x float> *%a2, align 16
%3 = call <4 x float> @llvm.x86.sse41.round.ss(<4 x float> %a0, <4 x float> %2, i32 7)
%4 = fadd <4 x float> %1, %3
ret <4 x float> %4
}
declare <4 x float> @llvm.x86.sse41.round.ss(<4 x float>, <4 x float>, i32) nounwind readnone