llvm-project/llvm/lib/ExecutionEngine/Orc/ObjectLinkingLayer.cpp

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

481 lines
15 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
//===------- ObjectLinkingLayer.cpp - JITLink backed ORC ObjectLayer ------===//
//
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "llvm/ExecutionEngine/Orc/ObjectLinkingLayer.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/Optional.h"
#include "llvm/ExecutionEngine/JITLink/EHFrameSupport.h"
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
#include <vector>
#define DEBUG_TYPE "orc"
using namespace llvm;
using namespace llvm::jitlink;
using namespace llvm::orc;
namespace llvm {
namespace orc {
class ObjectLinkingLayerJITLinkContext final : public JITLinkContext {
public:
ObjectLinkingLayerJITLinkContext(ObjectLinkingLayer &Layer,
MaterializationResponsibility MR,
std::unique_ptr<MemoryBuffer> ObjBuffer)
: Layer(Layer), MR(std::move(MR)), ObjBuffer(std::move(ObjBuffer)) {}
JITLinkMemoryManager &getMemoryManager() override { return Layer.MemMgr; }
MemoryBufferRef getObjectBuffer() const override {
return ObjBuffer->getMemBufferRef();
}
void notifyFailed(Error Err) override {
Layer.getExecutionSession().reportError(std::move(Err));
MR.failMaterialization();
}
void lookup(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols,
std::unique_ptr<JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation> LC) override {
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
JITDylibSearchList SearchOrder;
MR.getTargetJITDylib().withSearchOrderDo(
[&](const JITDylibSearchList &JDs) { SearchOrder = JDs; });
auto &ES = Layer.getExecutionSession();
SymbolNameSet InternedSymbols;
for (auto &S : Symbols)
InternedSymbols.insert(ES.intern(S));
// OnResolve -- De-intern the symbols and pass the result to the linker.
auto OnResolve = [this, LookupContinuation = std::move(LC)](
Expected<SymbolMap> Result) mutable {
auto Main = Layer.getExecutionSession().intern("_main");
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
if (!Result)
LookupContinuation->run(Result.takeError());
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
else {
AsyncLookupResult LR;
for (auto &KV : *Result)
LR[*KV.first] = KV.second;
LookupContinuation->run(std::move(LR));
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
}
};
ES.lookup(SearchOrder, std::move(InternedSymbols), SymbolState::Resolved,
std::move(OnResolve), [this](const SymbolDependenceMap &Deps) {
registerDependencies(Deps);
});
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
}
void notifyResolved(LinkGraph &G) override {
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
auto &ES = Layer.getExecutionSession();
SymbolFlagsMap ExtraSymbolsToClaim;
bool AutoClaim = Layer.AutoClaimObjectSymbols;
SymbolMap InternedResult;
for (auto *Sym : G.defined_symbols())
if (Sym->hasName() && Sym->getScope() != Scope::Local) {
auto InternedName = ES.intern(Sym->getName());
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
JITSymbolFlags Flags;
if (Sym->isCallable())
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
Flags |= JITSymbolFlags::Callable;
if (Sym->getScope() == Scope::Default)
Flags |= JITSymbolFlags::Exported;
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
InternedResult[InternedName] =
JITEvaluatedSymbol(Sym->getAddress(), Flags);
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
if (AutoClaim && !MR.getSymbols().count(InternedName)) {
assert(!ExtraSymbolsToClaim.count(InternedName) &&
"Duplicate symbol to claim?");
ExtraSymbolsToClaim[InternedName] = Flags;
}
}
for (auto *Sym : G.absolute_symbols())
if (Sym->hasName()) {
auto InternedName = ES.intern(Sym->getName());
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
JITSymbolFlags Flags;
Flags |= JITSymbolFlags::Absolute;
if (Sym->isCallable())
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
Flags |= JITSymbolFlags::Callable;
if (Sym->getLinkage() == Linkage::Weak)
Flags |= JITSymbolFlags::Weak;
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
InternedResult[InternedName] =
JITEvaluatedSymbol(Sym->getAddress(), Flags);
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
if (AutoClaim && !MR.getSymbols().count(InternedName)) {
assert(!ExtraSymbolsToClaim.count(InternedName) &&
"Duplicate symbol to claim?");
ExtraSymbolsToClaim[InternedName] = Flags;
}
}
if (!ExtraSymbolsToClaim.empty())
if (auto Err = MR.defineMaterializing(ExtraSymbolsToClaim))
return notifyFailed(std::move(Err));
if (auto Err = MR.notifyResolved(InternedResult)) {
Layer.getExecutionSession().reportError(std::move(Err));
MR.failMaterialization();
return;
}
Layer.notifyLoaded(MR);
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
}
void notifyFinalized(
std::unique_ptr<JITLinkMemoryManager::Allocation> A) override {
if (auto Err = Layer.notifyEmitted(MR, std::move(A))) {
Layer.getExecutionSession().reportError(std::move(Err));
MR.failMaterialization();
return;
}
if (auto Err = MR.notifyEmitted()) {
Layer.getExecutionSession().reportError(std::move(Err));
MR.failMaterialization();
}
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
}
LinkGraphPassFunction getMarkLivePass(const Triple &TT) const override {
return [this](LinkGraph &G) { return markResponsibilitySymbolsLive(G); };
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
}
Error modifyPassConfig(const Triple &TT, PassConfiguration &Config) override {
// Add passes to mark duplicate defs as should-discard, and to walk the
// link graph to build the symbol dependence graph.
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
Config.PrePrunePasses.push_back(
[this](LinkGraph &G) { return externalizeWeakAndCommonSymbols(G); });
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
Config.PostPrunePasses.push_back(
[this](LinkGraph &G) { return computeNamedSymbolDependencies(G); });
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
Layer.modifyPassConfig(MR, TT, Config);
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
return Error::success();
}
private:
using AnonToNamedDependenciesMap = DenseMap<const Symbol *, SymbolNameSet>;
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
Error externalizeWeakAndCommonSymbols(LinkGraph &G) {
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
auto &ES = Layer.getExecutionSession();
for (auto *Sym : G.defined_symbols())
if (Sym->hasName() && Sym->getLinkage() == Linkage::Weak) {
if (!MR.getSymbols().count(ES.intern(Sym->getName())))
G.makeExternal(*Sym);
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
}
for (auto *Sym : G.absolute_symbols())
if (Sym->hasName() && Sym->getLinkage() == Linkage::Weak) {
if (!MR.getSymbols().count(ES.intern(Sym->getName())))
G.makeExternal(*Sym);
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
}
return Error::success();
}
Error markResponsibilitySymbolsLive(LinkGraph &G) const {
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
auto &ES = Layer.getExecutionSession();
for (auto *Sym : G.defined_symbols())
if (Sym->hasName() && MR.getSymbols().count(ES.intern(Sym->getName())))
Sym->setLive(true);
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
return Error::success();
}
Error computeNamedSymbolDependencies(LinkGraph &G) {
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
auto &ES = MR.getTargetJITDylib().getExecutionSession();
auto AnonDeps = computeAnonDeps(G);
for (auto *Sym : G.defined_symbols()) {
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
// Skip anonymous and non-global atoms: we do not need dependencies for
// these.
if (Sym->getScope() == Scope::Local)
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
continue;
auto SymName = ES.intern(Sym->getName());
SymbolNameSet &SymDeps = NamedSymbolDeps[SymName];
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
for (auto &E : Sym->getBlock().edges()) {
auto &TargetSym = E.getTarget();
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
if (TargetSym.getScope() != Scope::Local)
SymDeps.insert(ES.intern(TargetSym.getName()));
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
else {
assert(TargetSym.isDefined() &&
"Anonymous/local symbols must be defined");
auto I = AnonDeps.find(&TargetSym);
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
if (I != AnonDeps.end())
for (auto &S : I->second)
SymDeps.insert(S);
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
}
}
}
return Error::success();
}
AnonToNamedDependenciesMap computeAnonDeps(LinkGraph &G) {
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
auto &ES = MR.getTargetJITDylib().getExecutionSession();
AnonToNamedDependenciesMap DepMap;
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
// For all anonymous symbols:
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
// (1) Add their named dependencies.
// (2) Add them to the worklist for further iteration if they have any
// depend on any other anonymous symbols.
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
struct WorklistEntry {
WorklistEntry(Symbol *Sym, DenseSet<Symbol *> SymAnonDeps)
: Sym(Sym), SymAnonDeps(std::move(SymAnonDeps)) {}
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
Symbol *Sym = nullptr;
DenseSet<Symbol *> SymAnonDeps;
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
};
std::vector<WorklistEntry> Worklist;
for (auto *Sym : G.defined_symbols())
if (!Sym->hasName()) {
auto &SymNamedDeps = DepMap[Sym];
DenseSet<Symbol *> SymAnonDeps;
for (auto &E : Sym->getBlock().edges()) {
auto &TargetSym = E.getTarget();
if (TargetSym.hasName())
SymNamedDeps.insert(ES.intern(TargetSym.getName()));
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
else {
assert(TargetSym.isDefined() &&
"Anonymous symbols must be defined");
SymAnonDeps.insert(&TargetSym);
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
}
}
if (!SymAnonDeps.empty())
Worklist.push_back(WorklistEntry(Sym, std::move(SymAnonDeps)));
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
}
// Loop over all anonymous symbols with anonymous dependencies, propagating
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
// their respective *named* dependencies. Iterate until we hit a stable
// state.
bool Changed;
do {
Changed = false;
for (auto &WLEntry : Worklist) {
auto *Sym = WLEntry.Sym;
auto &SymNamedDeps = DepMap[Sym];
auto &SymAnonDeps = WLEntry.SymAnonDeps;
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
for (auto *TargetSym : SymAnonDeps) {
auto I = DepMap.find(TargetSym);
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
if (I != DepMap.end())
for (const auto &S : I->second)
Changed |= SymNamedDeps.insert(S).second;
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
}
}
} while (Changed);
return DepMap;
}
void registerDependencies(const SymbolDependenceMap &QueryDeps) {
for (auto &NamedDepsEntry : NamedSymbolDeps) {
auto &Name = NamedDepsEntry.first;
auto &NameDeps = NamedDepsEntry.second;
SymbolDependenceMap SymbolDeps;
for (const auto &QueryDepsEntry : QueryDeps) {
JITDylib &SourceJD = *QueryDepsEntry.first;
const SymbolNameSet &Symbols = QueryDepsEntry.second;
auto &DepsForJD = SymbolDeps[&SourceJD];
for (const auto &S : Symbols)
if (NameDeps.count(S))
DepsForJD.insert(S);
if (DepsForJD.empty())
SymbolDeps.erase(&SourceJD);
}
MR.addDependencies(Name, SymbolDeps);
}
}
ObjectLinkingLayer &Layer;
MaterializationResponsibility MR;
std::unique_ptr<MemoryBuffer> ObjBuffer;
DenseMap<SymbolStringPtr, SymbolNameSet> NamedSymbolDeps;
};
ObjectLinkingLayer::Plugin::~Plugin() {}
ObjectLinkingLayer::ObjectLinkingLayer(ExecutionSession &ES,
JITLinkMemoryManager &MemMgr)
: ObjectLayer(ES), MemMgr(MemMgr) {}
ObjectLinkingLayer::~ObjectLinkingLayer() {
if (auto Err = removeAllModules())
getExecutionSession().reportError(std::move(Err));
}
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
void ObjectLinkingLayer::emit(MaterializationResponsibility R,
std::unique_ptr<MemoryBuffer> O) {
assert(O && "Object must not be null");
jitLink(std::make_unique<ObjectLinkingLayerJITLinkContext>(
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
*this, std::move(R), std::move(O)));
}
void ObjectLinkingLayer::modifyPassConfig(MaterializationResponsibility &MR,
const Triple &TT,
PassConfiguration &PassConfig) {
for (auto &P : Plugins)
P->modifyPassConfig(MR, TT, PassConfig);
}
void ObjectLinkingLayer::notifyLoaded(MaterializationResponsibility &MR) {
for (auto &P : Plugins)
P->notifyLoaded(MR);
}
Error ObjectLinkingLayer::notifyEmitted(MaterializationResponsibility &MR,
AllocPtr Alloc) {
Error Err = Error::success();
for (auto &P : Plugins)
Err = joinErrors(std::move(Err), P->notifyEmitted(MR));
if (Err)
return Err;
{
std::lock_guard<std::mutex> Lock(LayerMutex);
UntrackedAllocs.push_back(std::move(Alloc));
}
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
return Error::success();
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
}
Error ObjectLinkingLayer::removeModule(VModuleKey K) {
Error Err = Error::success();
for (auto &P : Plugins)
Err = joinErrors(std::move(Err), P->notifyRemovingModule(K));
AllocPtr Alloc;
{
std::lock_guard<std::mutex> Lock(LayerMutex);
auto AllocItr = TrackedAllocs.find(K);
Alloc = std::move(AllocItr->second);
TrackedAllocs.erase(AllocItr);
}
assert(Alloc && "No allocation for key K");
return joinErrors(std::move(Err), Alloc->deallocate());
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
}
Error ObjectLinkingLayer::removeAllModules() {
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
Error Err = Error::success();
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
for (auto &P : Plugins)
Err = joinErrors(std::move(Err), P->notifyRemovingAllModules());
std::vector<AllocPtr> Allocs;
{
std::lock_guard<std::mutex> Lock(LayerMutex);
Allocs = std::move(UntrackedAllocs);
for (auto &KV : TrackedAllocs)
Allocs.push_back(std::move(KV.second));
TrackedAllocs.clear();
}
while (!Allocs.empty()) {
Err = joinErrors(std::move(Err), Allocs.back()->deallocate());
Allocs.pop_back();
}
return Err;
}
EHFrameRegistrationPlugin::EHFrameRegistrationPlugin(
EHFrameRegistrar &Registrar)
: Registrar(Registrar) {}
void EHFrameRegistrationPlugin::modifyPassConfig(
MaterializationResponsibility &MR, const Triple &TT,
PassConfiguration &PassConfig) {
assert(!InProcessLinks.count(&MR) && "Link for MR already being tracked?");
PassConfig.PostFixupPasses.push_back(
createEHFrameRecorderPass(TT, [this, &MR](JITTargetAddress Addr,
size_t Size) {
if (Addr)
InProcessLinks[&MR] = { Addr, Size };
}));
}
Error EHFrameRegistrationPlugin::notifyEmitted(
MaterializationResponsibility &MR) {
auto EHFrameRangeItr = InProcessLinks.find(&MR);
if (EHFrameRangeItr == InProcessLinks.end())
return Error::success();
auto EHFrameRange = EHFrameRangeItr->second;
assert(EHFrameRange.Addr &&
"eh-frame addr to register can not be null");
InProcessLinks.erase(EHFrameRangeItr);
if (auto Key = MR.getVModuleKey())
TrackedEHFrameRanges[Key] = EHFrameRange;
else
UntrackedEHFrameRanges.push_back(EHFrameRange);
return Registrar.registerEHFrames(EHFrameRange.Addr, EHFrameRange.Size);
}
Error EHFrameRegistrationPlugin::notifyRemovingModule(VModuleKey K) {
auto EHFrameRangeItr = TrackedEHFrameRanges.find(K);
if (EHFrameRangeItr == TrackedEHFrameRanges.end())
return Error::success();
auto EHFrameRange = EHFrameRangeItr->second;
assert(EHFrameRange.Addr && "Tracked eh-frame range must not be null");
TrackedEHFrameRanges.erase(EHFrameRangeItr);
return Registrar.deregisterEHFrames(EHFrameRange.Addr, EHFrameRange.Size);
}
Error EHFrameRegistrationPlugin::notifyRemovingAllModules() {
std::vector<EHFrameRange> EHFrameRanges =
std::move(UntrackedEHFrameRanges);
EHFrameRanges.reserve(EHFrameRanges.size() + TrackedEHFrameRanges.size());
for (auto &KV : TrackedEHFrameRanges)
EHFrameRanges.push_back(KV.second);
TrackedEHFrameRanges.clear();
Error Err = Error::success();
while (!EHFrameRanges.empty()) {
auto EHFrameRange = EHFrameRanges.back();
assert(EHFrameRange.Addr && "Untracked eh-frame range must not be null");
EHFrameRanges.pop_back();
Err = joinErrors(std::move(Err),
Registrar.deregisterEHFrames(EHFrameRange.Addr,
EHFrameRange.Size));
}
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
return Err;
Initial implementation of JITLink - A replacement for RuntimeDyld. Summary: JITLink is a jit-linker that performs the same high-level task as RuntimeDyld: it parses relocatable object files and makes their contents runnable in a target process. JITLink aims to improve on RuntimeDyld in several ways: (1) A clear design intended to maximize code-sharing while minimizing coupling. RuntimeDyld has been developed in an ad-hoc fashion for a number of years and this had led to intermingling of code for multiple architectures (e.g. in RuntimeDyldELF::processRelocationRef) in a way that makes the code more difficult to read, reason about, extend. JITLink is designed to isolate format and architecture specific code, while still sharing generic code. (2) Support for native code models. RuntimeDyld required the use of large code models (where calls to external functions are made indirectly via registers) for many of platforms due to its restrictive model for stub generation (one "stub" per symbol). JITLink allows arbitrary mutation of the atom graph, allowing both GOT and PLT atoms to be added naturally. (3) Native support for asynchronous linking. JITLink uses asynchronous calls for symbol resolution and finalization: these callbacks are passed a continuation function that they must call to complete the linker's work. This allows for cleaner interoperation with the new concurrent ORC JIT APIs, while still being easily implementable in synchronous style if asynchrony is not needed. To maximise sharing, the design has a hierarchy of common code: (1) Generic atom-graph data structure and algorithms (e.g. dead stripping and | memory allocation) that are intended to be shared by all architectures. | + -- (2) Shared per-format code that utilizes (1), e.g. Generic MachO to | atom-graph parsing. | + -- (3) Architecture specific code that uses (1) and (2). E.g. JITLinkerMachO_x86_64, which adds x86-64 specific relocation support to (2) to build and patch up the atom graph. To support asynchronous symbol resolution and finalization, the callbacks for these operations take continuations as arguments: using JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation = std::function<void(Expected<AsyncLookupResult> LR)>; using JITLinkAsyncLookupFunction = std::function<void(const DenseSet<StringRef> &Symbols, JITLinkAsyncLookupContinuation LookupContinuation)>; using FinalizeContinuation = std::function<void(Error)>; virtual void finalizeAsync(FinalizeContinuation OnFinalize); In addition to its headline features, JITLink also makes other improvements: - Dead stripping support: symbols that are not used (e.g. redundant ODR definitions) are discarded, and take up no memory in the target process (In contrast, RuntimeDyld supported pointer equality for weak definitions, but the redundant definitions stayed resident in memory). - Improved exception handling support. JITLink provides a much more extensive eh-frame parser than RuntimeDyld, and is able to correctly fix up many eh-frame sections that RuntimeDyld currently (silently) fails on. - More extensive validation and error handling throughout. This initial patch supports linking MachO/x86-64 only. Work on support for other architectures and formats will happen in-tree. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58704 llvm-svn: 358818
2019-04-21 01:10:34 +08:00
}
} // End namespace orc.
} // End namespace llvm.