llvm-project/lldb/source/Expression/ClangExpressionParser.cpp

827 lines
29 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
//===-- ClangExpressionParser.cpp -------------------------------*- C++ -*-===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "lldb/lldb-python.h"
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
#include "lldb/Expression/ClangExpressionParser.h"
#include "lldb/Core/ArchSpec.h"
#include "lldb/Core/DataBufferHeap.h"
#include "lldb/Core/Debugger.h"
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
#include "lldb/Core/Disassembler.h"
#include "lldb/Core/Stream.h"
#include "lldb/Core/StreamString.h"
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
#include "lldb/Expression/ClangASTSource.h"
#include "lldb/Expression/ClangExpression.h"
#include "lldb/Expression/ClangExpressionDeclMap.h"
#include "lldb/Expression/IRDynamicChecks.h"
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
#include "lldb/Expression/RecordingMemoryManager.h"
#include "lldb/Target/ExecutionContext.h"
#include "lldb/Target/ObjCLanguageRuntime.h"
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
#include "lldb/Target/Process.h"
#include "lldb/Target/Target.h"
#include "clang/AST/ASTContext.h"
#include "clang/AST/ExternalASTSource.h"
#include "clang/Basic/FileManager.h"
#include "clang/Basic/TargetInfo.h"
#include "clang/Basic/Version.h"
#include "clang/CodeGen/CodeGenAction.h"
#include "clang/CodeGen/ModuleBuilder.h"
#include "clang/Driver/CC1Options.h"
#include "clang/Driver/OptTable.h"
#include "clang/Frontend/CompilerInstance.h"
#include "clang/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.h"
#include "clang/Frontend/FrontendActions.h"
#include "clang/Frontend/FrontendDiagnostic.h"
#include "clang/Frontend/FrontendPluginRegistry.h"
#include "clang/Frontend/TextDiagnosticBuffer.h"
#include "clang/Frontend/TextDiagnosticPrinter.h"
#include "clang/Lex/Preprocessor.h"
#include "clang/Parse/ParseAST.h"
#include "clang/Rewrite/Frontend/FrontendActions.h"
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
#include "clang/Sema/SemaConsumer.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Frontend/FrontendActions.h"
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
#include "llvm/ADT/StringRef.h"
#include "llvm/ExecutionEngine/ExecutionEngine.h"
#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
#include "llvm/Support/TargetSelect.h"
Added the ability to get the return value from a ThreadPlanCallFunction thread plan. In order to get the return value, you can call: void ThreadPlanCallFunction::RequestReturnValue (lldb::ValueSP &return_value_sp); This registers a shared pointer to a return value that will get filled in if everything goes well. After the thread plan is run the return value will be extracted for you. Added an ifdef to be able to switch between the LLVM MCJIT and the standand JIT. We currently have the standard JIT selected because we have some work to do to get the MCJIT fuctioning properly. Added the ability to call functions with 6 argument in the x86_64 ABI. Added the ability for GDBRemoteCommunicationClient to detect if the allocate and deallocate memory packets are supported and to not call allocate memory ("_M") or deallocate ("_m") if we find they aren't supported. Modified the ProcessGDBRemote::DoAllocateMemory(...) and ProcessGDBRemote::DoDeallocateMemory(...) to be able to deal with the allocate and deallocate memory packets not being supported. If they are not supported, ProcessGDBRemote will switch to calling "mmap" and "munmap" to allocate and deallocate memory instead using our trivial function call support. Modified the "void ProcessGDBRemote::DidLaunchOrAttach()" to correctly ignore the qHostInfo triple information if any was specified in the target. Currently if the target only specifies an architecture when creating the target: (lldb) target create --arch i386 a.out Then the vendor, os and environemnt will be adopted by the target. If the target was created with any triple that specifies more than the arch: (lldb) target create --arch i386-unknown-unknown a.out Then the target will maintain its triple and not adopt any new values. This can be used to help force bare board debugging where the dynamic loader for static files will get used and users can then use "target modules load ..." to set addressses for any files that are desired. Added back some convenience functions to the lldb_private::RegisterContext class for writing registers with unsigned values. Also made all RegisterContext constructors explicit to make sure we know when an integer is being converted to a RegisterValue. llvm-svn: 131370
2011-05-15 09:25:55 +08:00
#if defined(__FreeBSD__)
#define USE_STANDARD_JIT
#endif
Added the ability to get the return value from a ThreadPlanCallFunction thread plan. In order to get the return value, you can call: void ThreadPlanCallFunction::RequestReturnValue (lldb::ValueSP &return_value_sp); This registers a shared pointer to a return value that will get filled in if everything goes well. After the thread plan is run the return value will be extracted for you. Added an ifdef to be able to switch between the LLVM MCJIT and the standand JIT. We currently have the standard JIT selected because we have some work to do to get the MCJIT fuctioning properly. Added the ability to call functions with 6 argument in the x86_64 ABI. Added the ability for GDBRemoteCommunicationClient to detect if the allocate and deallocate memory packets are supported and to not call allocate memory ("_M") or deallocate ("_m") if we find they aren't supported. Modified the ProcessGDBRemote::DoAllocateMemory(...) and ProcessGDBRemote::DoDeallocateMemory(...) to be able to deal with the allocate and deallocate memory packets not being supported. If they are not supported, ProcessGDBRemote will switch to calling "mmap" and "munmap" to allocate and deallocate memory instead using our trivial function call support. Modified the "void ProcessGDBRemote::DidLaunchOrAttach()" to correctly ignore the qHostInfo triple information if any was specified in the target. Currently if the target only specifies an architecture when creating the target: (lldb) target create --arch i386 a.out Then the vendor, os and environemnt will be adopted by the target. If the target was created with any triple that specifies more than the arch: (lldb) target create --arch i386-unknown-unknown a.out Then the target will maintain its triple and not adopt any new values. This can be used to help force bare board debugging where the dynamic loader for static files will get used and users can then use "target modules load ..." to set addressses for any files that are desired. Added back some convenience functions to the lldb_private::RegisterContext class for writing registers with unsigned values. Also made all RegisterContext constructors explicit to make sure we know when an integer is being converted to a RegisterValue. llvm-svn: 131370
2011-05-15 09:25:55 +08:00
#if defined (USE_STANDARD_JIT)
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
#include "llvm/ExecutionEngine/JIT.h"
Added the ability to get the return value from a ThreadPlanCallFunction thread plan. In order to get the return value, you can call: void ThreadPlanCallFunction::RequestReturnValue (lldb::ValueSP &return_value_sp); This registers a shared pointer to a return value that will get filled in if everything goes well. After the thread plan is run the return value will be extracted for you. Added an ifdef to be able to switch between the LLVM MCJIT and the standand JIT. We currently have the standard JIT selected because we have some work to do to get the MCJIT fuctioning properly. Added the ability to call functions with 6 argument in the x86_64 ABI. Added the ability for GDBRemoteCommunicationClient to detect if the allocate and deallocate memory packets are supported and to not call allocate memory ("_M") or deallocate ("_m") if we find they aren't supported. Modified the ProcessGDBRemote::DoAllocateMemory(...) and ProcessGDBRemote::DoDeallocateMemory(...) to be able to deal with the allocate and deallocate memory packets not being supported. If they are not supported, ProcessGDBRemote will switch to calling "mmap" and "munmap" to allocate and deallocate memory instead using our trivial function call support. Modified the "void ProcessGDBRemote::DidLaunchOrAttach()" to correctly ignore the qHostInfo triple information if any was specified in the target. Currently if the target only specifies an architecture when creating the target: (lldb) target create --arch i386 a.out Then the vendor, os and environemnt will be adopted by the target. If the target was created with any triple that specifies more than the arch: (lldb) target create --arch i386-unknown-unknown a.out Then the target will maintain its triple and not adopt any new values. This can be used to help force bare board debugging where the dynamic loader for static files will get used and users can then use "target modules load ..." to set addressses for any files that are desired. Added back some convenience functions to the lldb_private::RegisterContext class for writing registers with unsigned values. Also made all RegisterContext constructors explicit to make sure we know when an integer is being converted to a RegisterValue. llvm-svn: 131370
2011-05-15 09:25:55 +08:00
#else
#include "llvm/ExecutionEngine/MCJIT.h"
#endif
#include "llvm/IR/LLVMContext.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Module.h"
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
#include "llvm/Support/ErrorHandling.h"
#include "llvm/Support/MemoryBuffer.h"
#include "llvm/Support/DynamicLibrary.h"
#include "llvm/Support/Host.h"
#include "llvm/Support/Signals.h"
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
using namespace clang;
using namespace llvm;
using namespace lldb_private;
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// Utility Methods for Clang
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
std::string GetBuiltinIncludePath(const char *Argv0) {
llvm::sys::Path P =
llvm::sys::Path::GetMainExecutable(Argv0,
(void*)(intptr_t) GetBuiltinIncludePath);
if (!P.isEmpty()) {
P.eraseComponent(); // Remove /clang from foo/bin/clang
P.eraseComponent(); // Remove /bin from foo/bin
// Get foo/lib/clang/<version>/include
P.appendComponent("lib");
P.appendComponent("clang");
P.appendComponent(CLANG_VERSION_STRING);
P.appendComponent("include");
}
return P.str();
}
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// Main driver for Clang
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
static void LLVMErrorHandler(void *UserData, const std::string &Message) {
DiagnosticsEngine &Diags = *static_cast<DiagnosticsEngine*>(UserData);
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
Diags.Report(diag::err_fe_error_backend) << Message;
// We cannot recover from llvm errors.
assert(0);
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
}
static FrontendAction *CreateFrontendBaseAction(CompilerInstance &CI) {
using namespace clang::frontend;
switch (CI.getFrontendOpts().ProgramAction) {
default:
llvm_unreachable("Invalid program action!");
case ASTDump: return new ASTDumpAction();
case ASTPrint: return new ASTPrintAction();
case ASTDumpXML: return new ASTDumpXMLAction();
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
case ASTView: return new ASTViewAction();
case DumpRawTokens: return new DumpRawTokensAction();
case DumpTokens: return new DumpTokensAction();
case EmitAssembly: return new EmitAssemblyAction();
case EmitBC: return new EmitBCAction();
case EmitHTML: return new HTMLPrintAction();
case EmitLLVM: return new EmitLLVMAction();
case EmitLLVMOnly: return new EmitLLVMOnlyAction();
case EmitCodeGenOnly: return new EmitCodeGenOnlyAction();
case EmitObj: return new EmitObjAction();
case FixIt: return new FixItAction();
case GeneratePCH: return new GeneratePCHAction();
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
case GeneratePTH: return new GeneratePTHAction();
case InitOnly: return new InitOnlyAction();
case ParseSyntaxOnly: return new SyntaxOnlyAction();
case PluginAction: {
for (FrontendPluginRegistry::iterator it =
FrontendPluginRegistry::begin(), ie = FrontendPluginRegistry::end();
it != ie; ++it) {
if (it->getName() == CI.getFrontendOpts().ActionName) {
llvm::OwningPtr<PluginASTAction> P(it->instantiate());
if (!P->ParseArgs(CI, CI.getFrontendOpts().PluginArgs))
return 0;
return P.take();
}
}
CI.getDiagnostics().Report(diag::err_fe_invalid_plugin_name)
<< CI.getFrontendOpts().ActionName;
return 0;
}
case PrintDeclContext: return new DeclContextPrintAction();
case PrintPreamble: return new PrintPreambleAction();
case PrintPreprocessedInput: return new PrintPreprocessedAction();
case RewriteMacros: return new RewriteMacrosAction();
case RewriteObjC: return new RewriteObjCAction();
case RewriteTest: return new RewriteTestAction();
//case RunAnalysis: return new AnalysisAction();
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
case RunPreprocessorOnly: return new PreprocessOnlyAction();
}
}
static FrontendAction *CreateFrontendAction(CompilerInstance &CI) {
// Create the underlying action.
FrontendAction *Act = CreateFrontendBaseAction(CI);
if (!Act)
return 0;
// If there are any AST files to merge, create a frontend action
// adaptor to perform the merge.
if (!CI.getFrontendOpts().ASTMergeFiles.empty())
Act = new ASTMergeAction(Act, CI.getFrontendOpts().ASTMergeFiles);
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
return Act;
}
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// Implementation of ClangExpressionParser
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
ClangExpressionParser::ClangExpressionParser (ExecutionContextScope *exe_scope,
ClangExpression &expr) :
m_expr (expr),
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
m_compiler (),
m_code_generator (NULL),
m_jitted_functions ()
{
// Initialize targets first, so that --version shows registered targets.
static struct InitializeLLVM {
InitializeLLVM() {
llvm::InitializeAllTargets();
llvm::InitializeAllAsmPrinters();
llvm::InitializeAllTargetMCs();
llvm::InitializeAllDisassemblers();
llvm::DisablePrettyStackTrace = true;
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
}
} InitializeLLVM;
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
// 1. Create a new compiler instance.
m_compiler.reset(new CompilerInstance());
// 2. Install the target.
lldb::TargetSP target_sp;
if (exe_scope)
target_sp = exe_scope->CalculateTarget();
// TODO: figure out what to really do when we don't have a valid target.
// Sometimes this will be ok to just use the host target triple (when we
// evaluate say "2+3", but other expressions like breakpoint conditions
// and other things that _are_ target specific really shouldn't just be
// using the host triple. This needs to be fixed in a better way.
if (target_sp && target_sp->GetArchitecture().IsValid())
{
std::string triple = target_sp->GetArchitecture().GetTriple().str();
int dash_count = 0;
for (size_t i = 0; i < triple.size(); ++i)
{
if (triple[i] == '-')
dash_count++;
if (dash_count == 3)
{
triple.resize(i);
break;
}
}
m_compiler->getTargetOpts().Triple = triple;
}
else
{
m_compiler->getTargetOpts().Triple = llvm::sys::getDefaultTargetTriple();
}
if (m_compiler->getTargetOpts().Triple.find("ios") != std::string::npos)
m_compiler->getTargetOpts().ABI = "apcs-gnu";
m_compiler->createDiagnostics();
// Create the target instance.
m_compiler->setTarget(TargetInfo::CreateTargetInfo(m_compiler->getDiagnostics(),
&m_compiler->getTargetOpts()));
assert (m_compiler->hasTarget());
// 3. Set options.
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
lldb::LanguageType language = expr.Language();
switch (language)
{
case lldb::eLanguageTypeC:
break;
case lldb::eLanguageTypeObjC:
m_compiler->getLangOpts().ObjC1 = true;
m_compiler->getLangOpts().ObjC2 = true;
break;
case lldb::eLanguageTypeC_plus_plus:
m_compiler->getLangOpts().CPlusPlus = true;
m_compiler->getLangOpts().CPlusPlus11 = true;
break;
case lldb::eLanguageTypeObjC_plus_plus:
default:
m_compiler->getLangOpts().ObjC1 = true;
m_compiler->getLangOpts().ObjC2 = true;
m_compiler->getLangOpts().CPlusPlus = true;
m_compiler->getLangOpts().CPlusPlus11 = true;
break;
}
m_compiler->getLangOpts().Bool = true;
m_compiler->getLangOpts().WChar = true;
m_compiler->getLangOpts().DebuggerSupport = true; // Features specifically for debugger clients
if (expr.DesiredResultType() == ClangExpression::eResultTypeId)
m_compiler->getLangOpts().DebuggerCastResultToId = true;
// Spell checking is a nice feature, but it ends up completing a
// lot of types that we didn't strictly speaking need to complete.
// As a result, we spend a long time parsing and importing debug
// information.
m_compiler->getLangOpts().SpellChecking = false;
lldb::ProcessSP process_sp;
if (exe_scope)
process_sp = exe_scope->CalculateProcess();
if (process_sp && m_compiler->getLangOpts().ObjC1)
{
if (process_sp->GetObjCLanguageRuntime())
{
if (process_sp->GetObjCLanguageRuntime()->GetRuntimeVersion() == eAppleObjC_V2)
m_compiler->getLangOpts().ObjCRuntime.set(ObjCRuntime::MacOSX, VersionTuple(10, 7));
else
m_compiler->getLangOpts().ObjCRuntime.set(ObjCRuntime::FragileMacOSX, VersionTuple(10, 7));
if (process_sp->GetObjCLanguageRuntime()->HasNewLiteralsAndIndexing())
m_compiler->getLangOpts().DebuggerObjCLiteral = true;
}
}
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
m_compiler->getLangOpts().ThreadsafeStatics = false;
m_compiler->getLangOpts().AccessControl = false; // Debuggers get universal access
m_compiler->getLangOpts().DollarIdents = true; // $ indicates a persistent variable name
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
// Set CodeGen options
m_compiler->getCodeGenOpts().EmitDeclMetadata = true;
m_compiler->getCodeGenOpts().InstrumentFunctions = false;
// Disable some warnings.
m_compiler->getDiagnosticOpts().Warnings.push_back("no-unused-value");
// Inform the target of the language options
//
// FIXME: We shouldn't need to do this, the target should be immutable once
// created. This complexity should be lifted elsewhere.
m_compiler->getTarget().setForcedLangOptions(m_compiler->getLangOpts());
// 4. Set up the diagnostic buffer for reporting errors
m_compiler->getDiagnostics().setClient(new clang::TextDiagnosticBuffer);
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
// 5. Set up the source management objects inside the compiler
clang::FileSystemOptions file_system_options;
m_file_manager.reset(new clang::FileManager(file_system_options));
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
if (!m_compiler->hasSourceManager())
m_compiler->createSourceManager(*m_file_manager.get());
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
m_compiler->createFileManager();
m_compiler->createPreprocessor();
// 6. Most of this we get from the CompilerInstance, but we
// also want to give the context an ExternalASTSource.
m_selector_table.reset(new SelectorTable());
m_builtin_context.reset(new Builtin::Context());
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
std::auto_ptr<clang::ASTContext> ast_context(new ASTContext(m_compiler->getLangOpts(),
m_compiler->getSourceManager(),
&m_compiler->getTarget(),
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
m_compiler->getPreprocessor().getIdentifierTable(),
*m_selector_table.get(),
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
*m_builtin_context.get(),
0));
ClangExpressionDeclMap *decl_map = m_expr.DeclMap();
if (decl_map)
{
llvm::OwningPtr<clang::ExternalASTSource> ast_source(decl_map->CreateProxy());
decl_map->InstallASTContext(ast_context.get());
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
ast_context->setExternalSource(ast_source);
}
m_compiler->setASTContext(ast_context.release());
std::string module_name("$__lldb_module");
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
m_llvm_context.reset(new LLVMContext());
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
m_code_generator.reset(CreateLLVMCodeGen(m_compiler->getDiagnostics(),
module_name,
m_compiler->getCodeGenOpts(),
*m_llvm_context));
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
}
ClangExpressionParser::~ClangExpressionParser()
{
}
unsigned
ClangExpressionParser::Parse (Stream &stream)
{
TextDiagnosticBuffer *diag_buf = static_cast<TextDiagnosticBuffer*>(m_compiler->getDiagnostics().getClient());
diag_buf->FlushDiagnostics (m_compiler->getDiagnostics());
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
MemoryBuffer *memory_buffer = MemoryBuffer::getMemBufferCopy(m_expr.Text(), __FUNCTION__);
m_compiler->getSourceManager().createMainFileIDForMemBuffer (memory_buffer);
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
diag_buf->BeginSourceFile(m_compiler->getLangOpts(), &m_compiler->getPreprocessor());
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
ASTConsumer *ast_transformer = m_expr.ASTTransformer(m_code_generator.get());
if (ast_transformer)
ParseAST(m_compiler->getPreprocessor(), ast_transformer, m_compiler->getASTContext());
else
ParseAST(m_compiler->getPreprocessor(), m_code_generator.get(), m_compiler->getASTContext());
diag_buf->EndSourceFile();
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
TextDiagnosticBuffer::const_iterator diag_iterator;
int num_errors = 0;
for (diag_iterator = diag_buf->warn_begin();
diag_iterator != diag_buf->warn_end();
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
++diag_iterator)
stream.Printf("warning: %s\n", (*diag_iterator).second.c_str());
num_errors = 0;
for (diag_iterator = diag_buf->err_begin();
diag_iterator != diag_buf->err_end();
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
++diag_iterator)
{
num_errors++;
stream.Printf("error: %s\n", (*diag_iterator).second.c_str());
}
for (diag_iterator = diag_buf->note_begin();
diag_iterator != diag_buf->note_end();
++diag_iterator)
stream.Printf("note: %s\n", (*diag_iterator).second.c_str());
if (!num_errors)
{
if (m_expr.DeclMap() && !m_expr.DeclMap()->ResolveUnknownTypes())
{
stream.Printf("error: Couldn't infer the type of a variable\n");
num_errors++;
}
}
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
return num_errors;
}
Removed the hacky "#define this ___clang_this" handler for C++ classes. Replaced it with a less hacky approach: - If an expression is defined in the context of a method of class A, then that expression is wrapped as ___clang_class::___clang_expr(void*) { ... } instead of ___clang_expr(void*) { ... }. - ___clang_class is resolved as the type of the target of the "this" pointer in the method the expression is defined in. - When reporting the type of ___clang_class, a method with the signature ___clang_expr(void*) is added to that class, so that Clang doesn't complain about a method being defined without a corresponding declaration. - Whenever the expression gets called, "this" gets looked up, type-checked, and then passed in as the first argument. This required the following changes: - The ABIs were changed to support passing of the "this" pointer as part of trivial calls. - ThreadPlanCallFunction and ClangFunction were changed to support passing of an optional "this" pointer. - ClangUserExpression was extended to perform the wrapping described above. - ClangASTSource was changed to revert the changes required by the hack. - ClangExpressionParser, IRForTarget, and ClangExpressionDeclMap were changed to handle different manglings of ___clang_expr flexibly. This meant no longer searching for a function called ___clang_expr, but rather looking for a function whose name *contains* ___clang_expr. - ClangExpressionParser and ClangExpressionDeclMap now remember whether "this" is required, and know how to look it up as necessary. A few inheritance bugs remain, and I'm trying to resolve these. But it is now possible to use "this" as well as refer implicitly to member variables, when in the proper context. llvm-svn: 114384
2010-09-21 08:44:12 +08:00
static bool FindFunctionInModule (std::string &mangled_name,
llvm::Module *module,
const char *orig_name)
{
for (llvm::Module::iterator fi = module->getFunctionList().begin(), fe = module->getFunctionList().end();
fi != fe;
++fi)
{
if (fi->getName().str().find(orig_name) != std::string::npos)
{
mangled_name = fi->getName().str();
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
Error
This patch modifies the expression parser to allow it to execute expressions even in the absence of a process. This allows expressions to run in situations where the target cannot run -- e.g., to perform calculations based on type information, or to inspect a binary's static data. This modification touches the following files: lldb-private-enumerations.h Introduce a new enum specifying the policy for processing an expression. Some expressions should always be JITted, for example if they are functions that will be used over and over again. Some expressions should always be interpreted, for example if the target is unsafe to run. For most, it is acceptable to JIT them, but interpretation is preferable when possible. Target.[h,cpp] Have EvaluateExpression now accept the new enum. ClangExpressionDeclMap.[cpp,h] Add support for the IR interpreter and also make the ClangExpressionDeclMap more robust in the absence of a process. ClangFunction.[cpp,h] Add support for the new enum. IRInterpreter.[cpp,h] New implementation. ClangUserExpression.[cpp,h] Add support for the new enum, and for running expressions in the absence of a process. ClangExpression.h Remove references to the old DWARF-based method of evaluating expressions, because it has been superseded for now. ClangUtilityFunction.[cpp,h] Add support for the new enum. ClangExpressionParser.[cpp,h] Add support for the new enum, remove references to DWARF, and add support for checking whether the expression could be evaluated statically. IRForTarget.[h,cpp] Add support for the new enum, and add utility functions to support the interpreter. IRToDWARF.cpp Removed CommandObjectExpression.cpp Remove references to the obsolete -i option. Process.cpp Modify calls to ClangUserExpression::Evaluate to pass the correct enum (for dlopen/dlclose) SBValue.cpp Add support for the new enum. SBFrame.cpp Add support for he new enum. BreakpointOptions.cpp Add support for the new enum. llvm-svn: 139772
2011-09-15 10:13:07 +08:00
ClangExpressionParser::PrepareForExecution (lldb::addr_t &func_allocation_addr,
lldb::addr_t &func_addr,
lldb::addr_t &func_end,
ExecutionContext &exe_ctx,
IRForTarget::StaticDataAllocator *data_allocator,
bool &evaluated_statically,
lldb::ClangExpressionVariableSP &const_result,
ExecutionPolicy execution_policy)
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
{
func_allocation_addr = LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS;
func_addr = LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS;
func_end = LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS;
lldb::LogSP log(lldb_private::GetLogIfAllCategoriesSet (LIBLLDB_LOG_EXPRESSIONS));
Removed the hacky "#define this ___clang_this" handler for C++ classes. Replaced it with a less hacky approach: - If an expression is defined in the context of a method of class A, then that expression is wrapped as ___clang_class::___clang_expr(void*) { ... } instead of ___clang_expr(void*) { ... }. - ___clang_class is resolved as the type of the target of the "this" pointer in the method the expression is defined in. - When reporting the type of ___clang_class, a method with the signature ___clang_expr(void*) is added to that class, so that Clang doesn't complain about a method being defined without a corresponding declaration. - Whenever the expression gets called, "this" gets looked up, type-checked, and then passed in as the first argument. This required the following changes: - The ABIs were changed to support passing of the "this" pointer as part of trivial calls. - ThreadPlanCallFunction and ClangFunction were changed to support passing of an optional "this" pointer. - ClangUserExpression was extended to perform the wrapping described above. - ClangASTSource was changed to revert the changes required by the hack. - ClangExpressionParser, IRForTarget, and ClangExpressionDeclMap were changed to handle different manglings of ___clang_expr flexibly. This meant no longer searching for a function called ___clang_expr, but rather looking for a function whose name *contains* ___clang_expr. - ClangExpressionParser and ClangExpressionDeclMap now remember whether "this" is required, and know how to look it up as necessary. A few inheritance bugs remain, and I'm trying to resolve these. But it is now possible to use "this" as well as refer implicitly to member variables, when in the proper context. llvm-svn: 114384
2010-09-21 08:44:12 +08:00
std::auto_ptr<llvm::ExecutionEngine> execution_engine_ap;
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
Error err;
std::auto_ptr<llvm::Module> module_ap (m_code_generator->ReleaseModule());
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
if (!module_ap.get())
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
{
err.SetErrorToGenericError();
err.SetErrorString("IR doesn't contain a module");
return err;
}
Removed the hacky "#define this ___clang_this" handler for C++ classes. Replaced it with a less hacky approach: - If an expression is defined in the context of a method of class A, then that expression is wrapped as ___clang_class::___clang_expr(void*) { ... } instead of ___clang_expr(void*) { ... }. - ___clang_class is resolved as the type of the target of the "this" pointer in the method the expression is defined in. - When reporting the type of ___clang_class, a method with the signature ___clang_expr(void*) is added to that class, so that Clang doesn't complain about a method being defined without a corresponding declaration. - Whenever the expression gets called, "this" gets looked up, type-checked, and then passed in as the first argument. This required the following changes: - The ABIs were changed to support passing of the "this" pointer as part of trivial calls. - ThreadPlanCallFunction and ClangFunction were changed to support passing of an optional "this" pointer. - ClangUserExpression was extended to perform the wrapping described above. - ClangASTSource was changed to revert the changes required by the hack. - ClangExpressionParser, IRForTarget, and ClangExpressionDeclMap were changed to handle different manglings of ___clang_expr flexibly. This meant no longer searching for a function called ___clang_expr, but rather looking for a function whose name *contains* ___clang_expr. - ClangExpressionParser and ClangExpressionDeclMap now remember whether "this" is required, and know how to look it up as necessary. A few inheritance bugs remain, and I'm trying to resolve these. But it is now possible to use "this" as well as refer implicitly to member variables, when in the proper context. llvm-svn: 114384
2010-09-21 08:44:12 +08:00
// Find the actual name of the function (it's often mangled somehow)
std::string function_name;
if (!FindFunctionInModule(function_name, module_ap.get(), m_expr.FunctionName()))
Removed the hacky "#define this ___clang_this" handler for C++ classes. Replaced it with a less hacky approach: - If an expression is defined in the context of a method of class A, then that expression is wrapped as ___clang_class::___clang_expr(void*) { ... } instead of ___clang_expr(void*) { ... }. - ___clang_class is resolved as the type of the target of the "this" pointer in the method the expression is defined in. - When reporting the type of ___clang_class, a method with the signature ___clang_expr(void*) is added to that class, so that Clang doesn't complain about a method being defined without a corresponding declaration. - Whenever the expression gets called, "this" gets looked up, type-checked, and then passed in as the first argument. This required the following changes: - The ABIs were changed to support passing of the "this" pointer as part of trivial calls. - ThreadPlanCallFunction and ClangFunction were changed to support passing of an optional "this" pointer. - ClangUserExpression was extended to perform the wrapping described above. - ClangASTSource was changed to revert the changes required by the hack. - ClangExpressionParser, IRForTarget, and ClangExpressionDeclMap were changed to handle different manglings of ___clang_expr flexibly. This meant no longer searching for a function called ___clang_expr, but rather looking for a function whose name *contains* ___clang_expr. - ClangExpressionParser and ClangExpressionDeclMap now remember whether "this" is required, and know how to look it up as necessary. A few inheritance bugs remain, and I'm trying to resolve these. But it is now possible to use "this" as well as refer implicitly to member variables, when in the proper context. llvm-svn: 114384
2010-09-21 08:44:12 +08:00
{
err.SetErrorToGenericError();
err.SetErrorStringWithFormat("Couldn't find %s() in the module", m_expr.FunctionName());
return err;
}
else
{
if (log)
Removed the hacky "#define this ___clang_this" handler for C++ classes. Replaced it with a less hacky approach: - If an expression is defined in the context of a method of class A, then that expression is wrapped as ___clang_class::___clang_expr(void*) { ... } instead of ___clang_expr(void*) { ... }. - ___clang_class is resolved as the type of the target of the "this" pointer in the method the expression is defined in. - When reporting the type of ___clang_class, a method with the signature ___clang_expr(void*) is added to that class, so that Clang doesn't complain about a method being defined without a corresponding declaration. - Whenever the expression gets called, "this" gets looked up, type-checked, and then passed in as the first argument. This required the following changes: - The ABIs were changed to support passing of the "this" pointer as part of trivial calls. - ThreadPlanCallFunction and ClangFunction were changed to support passing of an optional "this" pointer. - ClangUserExpression was extended to perform the wrapping described above. - ClangASTSource was changed to revert the changes required by the hack. - ClangExpressionParser, IRForTarget, and ClangExpressionDeclMap were changed to handle different manglings of ___clang_expr flexibly. This meant no longer searching for a function called ___clang_expr, but rather looking for a function whose name *contains* ___clang_expr. - ClangExpressionParser and ClangExpressionDeclMap now remember whether "this" is required, and know how to look it up as necessary. A few inheritance bugs remain, and I'm trying to resolve these. But it is now possible to use "this" as well as refer implicitly to member variables, when in the proper context. llvm-svn: 114384
2010-09-21 08:44:12 +08:00
log->Printf("Found function %s for %s", function_name.c_str(), m_expr.FunctionName());
}
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
ClangExpressionDeclMap *decl_map = m_expr.DeclMap(); // result can be NULL
if (decl_map)
{
Stream *error_stream = NULL;
Target *target = exe_ctx.GetTargetPtr();
if (target)
error_stream = &target->GetDebugger().GetErrorStream();
This patch modifies the expression parser to allow it to execute expressions even in the absence of a process. This allows expressions to run in situations where the target cannot run -- e.g., to perform calculations based on type information, or to inspect a binary's static data. This modification touches the following files: lldb-private-enumerations.h Introduce a new enum specifying the policy for processing an expression. Some expressions should always be JITted, for example if they are functions that will be used over and over again. Some expressions should always be interpreted, for example if the target is unsafe to run. For most, it is acceptable to JIT them, but interpretation is preferable when possible. Target.[h,cpp] Have EvaluateExpression now accept the new enum. ClangExpressionDeclMap.[cpp,h] Add support for the IR interpreter and also make the ClangExpressionDeclMap more robust in the absence of a process. ClangFunction.[cpp,h] Add support for the new enum. IRInterpreter.[cpp,h] New implementation. ClangUserExpression.[cpp,h] Add support for the new enum, and for running expressions in the absence of a process. ClangExpression.h Remove references to the old DWARF-based method of evaluating expressions, because it has been superseded for now. ClangUtilityFunction.[cpp,h] Add support for the new enum. ClangExpressionParser.[cpp,h] Add support for the new enum, remove references to DWARF, and add support for checking whether the expression could be evaluated statically. IRForTarget.[h,cpp] Add support for the new enum, and add utility functions to support the interpreter. IRToDWARF.cpp Removed CommandObjectExpression.cpp Remove references to the obsolete -i option. Process.cpp Modify calls to ClangUserExpression::Evaluate to pass the correct enum (for dlopen/dlclose) SBValue.cpp Add support for the new enum. SBFrame.cpp Add support for he new enum. BreakpointOptions.cpp Add support for the new enum. llvm-svn: 139772
2011-09-15 10:13:07 +08:00
IRForTarget ir_for_target(decl_map,
m_expr.NeedsVariableResolution(),
This patch modifies the expression parser to allow it to execute expressions even in the absence of a process. This allows expressions to run in situations where the target cannot run -- e.g., to perform calculations based on type information, or to inspect a binary's static data. This modification touches the following files: lldb-private-enumerations.h Introduce a new enum specifying the policy for processing an expression. Some expressions should always be JITted, for example if they are functions that will be used over and over again. Some expressions should always be interpreted, for example if the target is unsafe to run. For most, it is acceptable to JIT them, but interpretation is preferable when possible. Target.[h,cpp] Have EvaluateExpression now accept the new enum. ClangExpressionDeclMap.[cpp,h] Add support for the IR interpreter and also make the ClangExpressionDeclMap more robust in the absence of a process. ClangFunction.[cpp,h] Add support for the new enum. IRInterpreter.[cpp,h] New implementation. ClangUserExpression.[cpp,h] Add support for the new enum, and for running expressions in the absence of a process. ClangExpression.h Remove references to the old DWARF-based method of evaluating expressions, because it has been superseded for now. ClangUtilityFunction.[cpp,h] Add support for the new enum. ClangExpressionParser.[cpp,h] Add support for the new enum, remove references to DWARF, and add support for checking whether the expression could be evaluated statically. IRForTarget.[h,cpp] Add support for the new enum, and add utility functions to support the interpreter. IRToDWARF.cpp Removed CommandObjectExpression.cpp Remove references to the obsolete -i option. Process.cpp Modify calls to ClangUserExpression::Evaluate to pass the correct enum (for dlopen/dlclose) SBValue.cpp Add support for the new enum. SBFrame.cpp Add support for he new enum. BreakpointOptions.cpp Add support for the new enum. llvm-svn: 139772
2011-09-15 10:13:07 +08:00
execution_policy,
const_result,
data_allocator,
error_stream,
Removed the hacky "#define this ___clang_this" handler for C++ classes. Replaced it with a less hacky approach: - If an expression is defined in the context of a method of class A, then that expression is wrapped as ___clang_class::___clang_expr(void*) { ... } instead of ___clang_expr(void*) { ... }. - ___clang_class is resolved as the type of the target of the "this" pointer in the method the expression is defined in. - When reporting the type of ___clang_class, a method with the signature ___clang_expr(void*) is added to that class, so that Clang doesn't complain about a method being defined without a corresponding declaration. - Whenever the expression gets called, "this" gets looked up, type-checked, and then passed in as the first argument. This required the following changes: - The ABIs were changed to support passing of the "this" pointer as part of trivial calls. - ThreadPlanCallFunction and ClangFunction were changed to support passing of an optional "this" pointer. - ClangUserExpression was extended to perform the wrapping described above. - ClangASTSource was changed to revert the changes required by the hack. - ClangExpressionParser, IRForTarget, and ClangExpressionDeclMap were changed to handle different manglings of ___clang_expr flexibly. This meant no longer searching for a function called ___clang_expr, but rather looking for a function whose name *contains* ___clang_expr. - ClangExpressionParser and ClangExpressionDeclMap now remember whether "this" is required, and know how to look it up as necessary. A few inheritance bugs remain, and I'm trying to resolve these. But it is now possible to use "this" as well as refer implicitly to member variables, when in the proper context. llvm-svn: 114384
2010-09-21 08:44:12 +08:00
function_name.c_str());
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
bool ir_can_run = ir_for_target.runOnModule(*module_ap);
Error &interpreter_error(ir_for_target.getInterpreterError());
if (execution_policy != eExecutionPolicyAlways && interpreter_error.Success())
{
if (const_result)
const_result->TransferAddress();
This patch modifies the expression parser to allow it to execute expressions even in the absence of a process. This allows expressions to run in situations where the target cannot run -- e.g., to perform calculations based on type information, or to inspect a binary's static data. This modification touches the following files: lldb-private-enumerations.h Introduce a new enum specifying the policy for processing an expression. Some expressions should always be JITted, for example if they are functions that will be used over and over again. Some expressions should always be interpreted, for example if the target is unsafe to run. For most, it is acceptable to JIT them, but interpretation is preferable when possible. Target.[h,cpp] Have EvaluateExpression now accept the new enum. ClangExpressionDeclMap.[cpp,h] Add support for the IR interpreter and also make the ClangExpressionDeclMap more robust in the absence of a process. ClangFunction.[cpp,h] Add support for the new enum. IRInterpreter.[cpp,h] New implementation. ClangUserExpression.[cpp,h] Add support for the new enum, and for running expressions in the absence of a process. ClangExpression.h Remove references to the old DWARF-based method of evaluating expressions, because it has been superseded for now. ClangUtilityFunction.[cpp,h] Add support for the new enum. ClangExpressionParser.[cpp,h] Add support for the new enum, remove references to DWARF, and add support for checking whether the expression could be evaluated statically. IRForTarget.[h,cpp] Add support for the new enum, and add utility functions to support the interpreter. IRToDWARF.cpp Removed CommandObjectExpression.cpp Remove references to the obsolete -i option. Process.cpp Modify calls to ClangUserExpression::Evaluate to pass the correct enum (for dlopen/dlclose) SBValue.cpp Add support for the new enum. SBFrame.cpp Add support for he new enum. BreakpointOptions.cpp Add support for the new enum. llvm-svn: 139772
2011-09-15 10:13:07 +08:00
evaluated_statically = true;
err.Clear();
return err;
}
Process *process = exe_ctx.GetProcessPtr();
if (!process || execution_policy == eExecutionPolicyNever)
This patch modifies the expression parser to allow it to execute expressions even in the absence of a process. This allows expressions to run in situations where the target cannot run -- e.g., to perform calculations based on type information, or to inspect a binary's static data. This modification touches the following files: lldb-private-enumerations.h Introduce a new enum specifying the policy for processing an expression. Some expressions should always be JITted, for example if they are functions that will be used over and over again. Some expressions should always be interpreted, for example if the target is unsafe to run. For most, it is acceptable to JIT them, but interpretation is preferable when possible. Target.[h,cpp] Have EvaluateExpression now accept the new enum. ClangExpressionDeclMap.[cpp,h] Add support for the IR interpreter and also make the ClangExpressionDeclMap more robust in the absence of a process. ClangFunction.[cpp,h] Add support for the new enum. IRInterpreter.[cpp,h] New implementation. ClangUserExpression.[cpp,h] Add support for the new enum, and for running expressions in the absence of a process. ClangExpression.h Remove references to the old DWARF-based method of evaluating expressions, because it has been superseded for now. ClangUtilityFunction.[cpp,h] Add support for the new enum. ClangExpressionParser.[cpp,h] Add support for the new enum, remove references to DWARF, and add support for checking whether the expression could be evaluated statically. IRForTarget.[h,cpp] Add support for the new enum, and add utility functions to support the interpreter. IRToDWARF.cpp Removed CommandObjectExpression.cpp Remove references to the obsolete -i option. Process.cpp Modify calls to ClangUserExpression::Evaluate to pass the correct enum (for dlopen/dlclose) SBValue.cpp Add support for the new enum. SBFrame.cpp Add support for he new enum. BreakpointOptions.cpp Add support for the new enum. llvm-svn: 139772
2011-09-15 10:13:07 +08:00
{
err.SetErrorToGenericError();
if (execution_policy == eExecutionPolicyAlways)
err.SetErrorString("Execution needed to run in the target, but the target can't be run");
else
err.SetErrorStringWithFormat("Interpreting the expression locally failed: %s", interpreter_error.AsCString());
This patch modifies the expression parser to allow it to execute expressions even in the absence of a process. This allows expressions to run in situations where the target cannot run -- e.g., to perform calculations based on type information, or to inspect a binary's static data. This modification touches the following files: lldb-private-enumerations.h Introduce a new enum specifying the policy for processing an expression. Some expressions should always be JITted, for example if they are functions that will be used over and over again. Some expressions should always be interpreted, for example if the target is unsafe to run. For most, it is acceptable to JIT them, but interpretation is preferable when possible. Target.[h,cpp] Have EvaluateExpression now accept the new enum. ClangExpressionDeclMap.[cpp,h] Add support for the IR interpreter and also make the ClangExpressionDeclMap more robust in the absence of a process. ClangFunction.[cpp,h] Add support for the new enum. IRInterpreter.[cpp,h] New implementation. ClangUserExpression.[cpp,h] Add support for the new enum, and for running expressions in the absence of a process. ClangExpression.h Remove references to the old DWARF-based method of evaluating expressions, because it has been superseded for now. ClangUtilityFunction.[cpp,h] Add support for the new enum. ClangExpressionParser.[cpp,h] Add support for the new enum, remove references to DWARF, and add support for checking whether the expression could be evaluated statically. IRForTarget.[h,cpp] Add support for the new enum, and add utility functions to support the interpreter. IRToDWARF.cpp Removed CommandObjectExpression.cpp Remove references to the obsolete -i option. Process.cpp Modify calls to ClangUserExpression::Evaluate to pass the correct enum (for dlopen/dlclose) SBValue.cpp Add support for the new enum. SBFrame.cpp Add support for he new enum. BreakpointOptions.cpp Add support for the new enum. llvm-svn: 139772
2011-09-15 10:13:07 +08:00
return err;
}
else if (!ir_can_run)
{
err.SetErrorToGenericError();
err.SetErrorString("The expression could not be prepared to run in the target");
return err;
}
This patch modifies the expression parser to allow it to execute expressions even in the absence of a process. This allows expressions to run in situations where the target cannot run -- e.g., to perform calculations based on type information, or to inspect a binary's static data. This modification touches the following files: lldb-private-enumerations.h Introduce a new enum specifying the policy for processing an expression. Some expressions should always be JITted, for example if they are functions that will be used over and over again. Some expressions should always be interpreted, for example if the target is unsafe to run. For most, it is acceptable to JIT them, but interpretation is preferable when possible. Target.[h,cpp] Have EvaluateExpression now accept the new enum. ClangExpressionDeclMap.[cpp,h] Add support for the IR interpreter and also make the ClangExpressionDeclMap more robust in the absence of a process. ClangFunction.[cpp,h] Add support for the new enum. IRInterpreter.[cpp,h] New implementation. ClangUserExpression.[cpp,h] Add support for the new enum, and for running expressions in the absence of a process. ClangExpression.h Remove references to the old DWARF-based method of evaluating expressions, because it has been superseded for now. ClangUtilityFunction.[cpp,h] Add support for the new enum. ClangExpressionParser.[cpp,h] Add support for the new enum, remove references to DWARF, and add support for checking whether the expression could be evaluated statically. IRForTarget.[h,cpp] Add support for the new enum, and add utility functions to support the interpreter. IRToDWARF.cpp Removed CommandObjectExpression.cpp Remove references to the obsolete -i option. Process.cpp Modify calls to ClangUserExpression::Evaluate to pass the correct enum (for dlopen/dlclose) SBValue.cpp Add support for the new enum. SBFrame.cpp Add support for he new enum. BreakpointOptions.cpp Add support for the new enum. llvm-svn: 139772
2011-09-15 10:13:07 +08:00
if (execution_policy != eExecutionPolicyNever &&
m_expr.NeedsValidation() &&
process)
{
if (!process->GetDynamicCheckers())
{
DynamicCheckerFunctions *dynamic_checkers = new DynamicCheckerFunctions();
StreamString install_errors;
if (!dynamic_checkers->Install(install_errors, exe_ctx))
{
if (install_errors.GetString().empty())
err.SetErrorString ("couldn't install checkers, unknown error");
else
err.SetErrorString (install_errors.GetString().c_str());
return err;
}
process->SetDynamicCheckers(dynamic_checkers);
if (log)
log->Printf("== [ClangUserExpression::Evaluate] Finished installing dynamic checkers ==");
}
IRDynamicChecks ir_dynamic_checks(*process->GetDynamicCheckers(), function_name.c_str());
if (!ir_dynamic_checks.runOnModule(*module_ap))
{
err.SetErrorToGenericError();
err.SetErrorString("Couldn't add dynamic checks to the expression");
return err;
}
}
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
}
// llvm will own this pointer when llvm::ExecutionEngine::createJIT is called
// below so we don't need to free it.
RecordingMemoryManager *jit_memory_manager = new RecordingMemoryManager();
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
std::string error_string;
if (log)
{
std::string s;
raw_string_ostream oss(s);
module_ap->print(oss, NULL);
oss.flush();
log->Printf ("Module being sent to JIT: \n%s", s.c_str());
}
llvm::Triple triple(module_ap->getTargetTriple());
llvm::Function *function = module_ap->getFunction (function_name.c_str());
EngineBuilder builder(module_ap.release());
Added the ability to get the return value from a ThreadPlanCallFunction thread plan. In order to get the return value, you can call: void ThreadPlanCallFunction::RequestReturnValue (lldb::ValueSP &return_value_sp); This registers a shared pointer to a return value that will get filled in if everything goes well. After the thread plan is run the return value will be extracted for you. Added an ifdef to be able to switch between the LLVM MCJIT and the standand JIT. We currently have the standard JIT selected because we have some work to do to get the MCJIT fuctioning properly. Added the ability to call functions with 6 argument in the x86_64 ABI. Added the ability for GDBRemoteCommunicationClient to detect if the allocate and deallocate memory packets are supported and to not call allocate memory ("_M") or deallocate ("_m") if we find they aren't supported. Modified the ProcessGDBRemote::DoAllocateMemory(...) and ProcessGDBRemote::DoDeallocateMemory(...) to be able to deal with the allocate and deallocate memory packets not being supported. If they are not supported, ProcessGDBRemote will switch to calling "mmap" and "munmap" to allocate and deallocate memory instead using our trivial function call support. Modified the "void ProcessGDBRemote::DidLaunchOrAttach()" to correctly ignore the qHostInfo triple information if any was specified in the target. Currently if the target only specifies an architecture when creating the target: (lldb) target create --arch i386 a.out Then the vendor, os and environemnt will be adopted by the target. If the target was created with any triple that specifies more than the arch: (lldb) target create --arch i386-unknown-unknown a.out Then the target will maintain its triple and not adopt any new values. This can be used to help force bare board debugging where the dynamic loader for static files will get used and users can then use "target modules load ..." to set addressses for any files that are desired. Added back some convenience functions to the lldb_private::RegisterContext class for writing registers with unsigned values. Also made all RegisterContext constructors explicit to make sure we know when an integer is being converted to a RegisterValue. llvm-svn: 131370
2011-05-15 09:25:55 +08:00
builder.setEngineKind(EngineKind::JIT)
.setErrorStr(&error_string)
.setRelocationModel(llvm::Reloc::PIC_)
Added the ability to get the return value from a ThreadPlanCallFunction thread plan. In order to get the return value, you can call: void ThreadPlanCallFunction::RequestReturnValue (lldb::ValueSP &return_value_sp); This registers a shared pointer to a return value that will get filled in if everything goes well. After the thread plan is run the return value will be extracted for you. Added an ifdef to be able to switch between the LLVM MCJIT and the standand JIT. We currently have the standard JIT selected because we have some work to do to get the MCJIT fuctioning properly. Added the ability to call functions with 6 argument in the x86_64 ABI. Added the ability for GDBRemoteCommunicationClient to detect if the allocate and deallocate memory packets are supported and to not call allocate memory ("_M") or deallocate ("_m") if we find they aren't supported. Modified the ProcessGDBRemote::DoAllocateMemory(...) and ProcessGDBRemote::DoDeallocateMemory(...) to be able to deal with the allocate and deallocate memory packets not being supported. If they are not supported, ProcessGDBRemote will switch to calling "mmap" and "munmap" to allocate and deallocate memory instead using our trivial function call support. Modified the "void ProcessGDBRemote::DidLaunchOrAttach()" to correctly ignore the qHostInfo triple information if any was specified in the target. Currently if the target only specifies an architecture when creating the target: (lldb) target create --arch i386 a.out Then the vendor, os and environemnt will be adopted by the target. If the target was created with any triple that specifies more than the arch: (lldb) target create --arch i386-unknown-unknown a.out Then the target will maintain its triple and not adopt any new values. This can be used to help force bare board debugging where the dynamic loader for static files will get used and users can then use "target modules load ..." to set addressses for any files that are desired. Added back some convenience functions to the lldb_private::RegisterContext class for writing registers with unsigned values. Also made all RegisterContext constructors explicit to make sure we know when an integer is being converted to a RegisterValue. llvm-svn: 131370
2011-05-15 09:25:55 +08:00
.setJITMemoryManager(jit_memory_manager)
.setOptLevel(CodeGenOpt::Less)
.setAllocateGVsWithCode(true)
.setCodeModel(CodeModel::Small)
.setUseMCJIT(true);
StringRef mArch;
StringRef mCPU;
SmallVector<std::string, 0> mAttrs;
TargetMachine *target_machine = builder.selectTarget(triple,
mArch,
mCPU,
mAttrs);
execution_engine_ap.reset(builder.create(target_machine));
if (!execution_engine_ap.get())
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
{
err.SetErrorToGenericError();
err.SetErrorStringWithFormat("Couldn't JIT the function: %s", error_string.c_str());
return err;
}
execution_engine_ap->DisableLazyCompilation();
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
// We don't actually need the function pointer here, this just forces it to get resolved.
void *fun_ptr = execution_engine_ap->getPointerToFunction(function);
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
// Errors usually cause failures in the JIT, but if we're lucky we get here.
if (!function)
{
err.SetErrorToGenericError();
err.SetErrorStringWithFormat("Couldn't find '%s' in the JITted module", function_name.c_str());
return err;
}
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
if (!fun_ptr)
{
err.SetErrorToGenericError();
err.SetErrorStringWithFormat("'%s' was in the JITted module but wasn't lowered", function_name.c_str());
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
return err;
}
Removed the hacky "#define this ___clang_this" handler for C++ classes. Replaced it with a less hacky approach: - If an expression is defined in the context of a method of class A, then that expression is wrapped as ___clang_class::___clang_expr(void*) { ... } instead of ___clang_expr(void*) { ... }. - ___clang_class is resolved as the type of the target of the "this" pointer in the method the expression is defined in. - When reporting the type of ___clang_class, a method with the signature ___clang_expr(void*) is added to that class, so that Clang doesn't complain about a method being defined without a corresponding declaration. - Whenever the expression gets called, "this" gets looked up, type-checked, and then passed in as the first argument. This required the following changes: - The ABIs were changed to support passing of the "this" pointer as part of trivial calls. - ThreadPlanCallFunction and ClangFunction were changed to support passing of an optional "this" pointer. - ClangUserExpression was extended to perform the wrapping described above. - ClangASTSource was changed to revert the changes required by the hack. - ClangExpressionParser, IRForTarget, and ClangExpressionDeclMap were changed to handle different manglings of ___clang_expr flexibly. This meant no longer searching for a function called ___clang_expr, but rather looking for a function whose name *contains* ___clang_expr. - ClangExpressionParser and ClangExpressionDeclMap now remember whether "this" is required, and know how to look it up as necessary. A few inheritance bugs remain, and I'm trying to resolve these. But it is now possible to use "this" as well as refer implicitly to member variables, when in the proper context. llvm-svn: 114384
2010-09-21 08:44:12 +08:00
m_jitted_functions.push_back (ClangExpressionParser::JittedFunction(function_name.c_str(), (lldb::addr_t)fun_ptr));
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
Process *process = exe_ctx.GetProcessPtr();
if (process == NULL)
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
{
err.SetErrorToGenericError();
err.SetErrorString("Couldn't write the JIT compiled code into the target because there is no target");
return err;
}
jit_memory_manager->CommitAllocations(*process);
jit_memory_manager->ReportAllocations(*execution_engine_ap);
jit_memory_manager->WriteData(*process);
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
std::vector<JittedFunction>::iterator pos, end = m_jitted_functions.end();
for (pos = m_jitted_functions.begin(); pos != end; pos++)
{
(*pos).m_remote_addr = jit_memory_manager->GetRemoteAddressForLocal ((*pos).m_local_addr);
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
Removed the hacky "#define this ___clang_this" handler for C++ classes. Replaced it with a less hacky approach: - If an expression is defined in the context of a method of class A, then that expression is wrapped as ___clang_class::___clang_expr(void*) { ... } instead of ___clang_expr(void*) { ... }. - ___clang_class is resolved as the type of the target of the "this" pointer in the method the expression is defined in. - When reporting the type of ___clang_class, a method with the signature ___clang_expr(void*) is added to that class, so that Clang doesn't complain about a method being defined without a corresponding declaration. - Whenever the expression gets called, "this" gets looked up, type-checked, and then passed in as the first argument. This required the following changes: - The ABIs were changed to support passing of the "this" pointer as part of trivial calls. - ThreadPlanCallFunction and ClangFunction were changed to support passing of an optional "this" pointer. - ClangUserExpression was extended to perform the wrapping described above. - ClangASTSource was changed to revert the changes required by the hack. - ClangExpressionParser, IRForTarget, and ClangExpressionDeclMap were changed to handle different manglings of ___clang_expr flexibly. This meant no longer searching for a function called ___clang_expr, but rather looking for a function whose name *contains* ___clang_expr. - ClangExpressionParser and ClangExpressionDeclMap now remember whether "this" is required, and know how to look it up as necessary. A few inheritance bugs remain, and I'm trying to resolve these. But it is now possible to use "this" as well as refer implicitly to member variables, when in the proper context. llvm-svn: 114384
2010-09-21 08:44:12 +08:00
if (!(*pos).m_name.compare(function_name.c_str()))
{
RecordingMemoryManager::AddrRange func_range = jit_memory_manager->GetRemoteRangeForLocal((*pos).m_local_addr);
func_end = func_range.first + func_range.second;
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
func_addr = (*pos).m_remote_addr;
}
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
}
if (log)
{
log->Printf("Code can be run in the target.");
StreamString disassembly_stream;
Error err = DisassembleFunction(disassembly_stream, exe_ctx, jit_memory_manager);
if (!err.Success())
{
log->Printf("Couldn't disassemble function : %s", err.AsCString("unknown error"));
}
else
{
log->Printf("Function disassembly:\n%s", disassembly_stream.GetData());
}
}
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
err.Clear();
return err;
}
Error
ClangExpressionParser::DisassembleFunction (Stream &stream, ExecutionContext &exe_ctx, RecordingMemoryManager *jit_memory_manager)
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
{
lldb::LogSP log(lldb_private::GetLogIfAllCategoriesSet (LIBLLDB_LOG_EXPRESSIONS));
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
const char *name = m_expr.FunctionName();
Error ret;
ret.Clear();
lldb::addr_t func_local_addr = LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS;
lldb::addr_t func_remote_addr = LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS;
std::vector<JittedFunction>::iterator pos, end = m_jitted_functions.end();
for (pos = m_jitted_functions.begin(); pos < end; pos++)
{
Removed the hacky "#define this ___clang_this" handler for C++ classes. Replaced it with a less hacky approach: - If an expression is defined in the context of a method of class A, then that expression is wrapped as ___clang_class::___clang_expr(void*) { ... } instead of ___clang_expr(void*) { ... }. - ___clang_class is resolved as the type of the target of the "this" pointer in the method the expression is defined in. - When reporting the type of ___clang_class, a method with the signature ___clang_expr(void*) is added to that class, so that Clang doesn't complain about a method being defined without a corresponding declaration. - Whenever the expression gets called, "this" gets looked up, type-checked, and then passed in as the first argument. This required the following changes: - The ABIs were changed to support passing of the "this" pointer as part of trivial calls. - ThreadPlanCallFunction and ClangFunction were changed to support passing of an optional "this" pointer. - ClangUserExpression was extended to perform the wrapping described above. - ClangASTSource was changed to revert the changes required by the hack. - ClangExpressionParser, IRForTarget, and ClangExpressionDeclMap were changed to handle different manglings of ___clang_expr flexibly. This meant no longer searching for a function called ___clang_expr, but rather looking for a function whose name *contains* ___clang_expr. - ClangExpressionParser and ClangExpressionDeclMap now remember whether "this" is required, and know how to look it up as necessary. A few inheritance bugs remain, and I'm trying to resolve these. But it is now possible to use "this" as well as refer implicitly to member variables, when in the proper context. llvm-svn: 114384
2010-09-21 08:44:12 +08:00
if (strstr(pos->m_name.c_str(), name))
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
{
func_local_addr = pos->m_local_addr;
func_remote_addr = pos->m_remote_addr;
}
}
if (func_local_addr == LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS)
{
ret.SetErrorToGenericError();
ret.SetErrorStringWithFormat("Couldn't find function %s for disassembly", name);
return ret;
}
if (log)
log->Printf("Found function, has local address 0x%" PRIx64 " and remote address 0x%" PRIx64, (uint64_t)func_local_addr, (uint64_t)func_remote_addr);
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
std::pair <lldb::addr_t, lldb::addr_t> func_range;
func_range = jit_memory_manager->GetRemoteRangeForLocal(func_local_addr);
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
if (func_range.first == 0 && func_range.second == 0)
{
ret.SetErrorToGenericError();
ret.SetErrorStringWithFormat("Couldn't find code range for function %s", name);
return ret;
}
if (log)
log->Printf("Function's code range is [0x%" PRIx64 "+0x%" PRIx64 "]", func_range.first, func_range.second);
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
Target *target = exe_ctx.GetTargetPtr();
if (!target)
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
{
ret.SetErrorToGenericError();
ret.SetErrorString("Couldn't find the target");
return ret;
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
}
lldb::DataBufferSP buffer_sp(new DataBufferHeap(func_range.second, 0));
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
Process *process = exe_ctx.GetProcessPtr();
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
Error err;
process->ReadMemory(func_remote_addr, buffer_sp->GetBytes(), buffer_sp->GetByteSize(), err);
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
if (!err.Success())
{
ret.SetErrorToGenericError();
ret.SetErrorStringWithFormat("Couldn't read from process: %s", err.AsCString("unknown error"));
return ret;
}
ArchSpec arch(target->GetArchitecture());
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
lldb::DisassemblerSP disassembler = Disassembler::FindPlugin(arch, NULL);
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
if (!disassembler)
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
{
ret.SetErrorToGenericError();
Abtracted all mach-o and ELF out of ArchSpec. This patch is a modified form of Stephen Wilson's idea (thanks for the input Stephen!). What I ended up doing was: - Got rid of ArchSpec::CPU (which was a generic CPU enumeration that mimics the contents of llvm::Triple::ArchType). We now rely upon the llvm::Triple to give us the machine type from llvm::Triple::ArchType. - There is a new ArchSpec::Core definition which further qualifies the CPU core we are dealing with into a single enumeration. If you need support for a new Core and want to debug it in LLDB, it must be added to this list. In the future we can allow for dynamic core registration, but for now it is hard coded. - The ArchSpec can now be initialized with a llvm::Triple or with a C string that represents the triple (it can just be an arch still like "i386"). - The ArchSpec can still initialize itself with a architecture type -- mach-o with cpu type and subtype, or ELF with e_machine + e_flags -- and this will then get translated into the internal llvm::Triple::ArchSpec + ArchSpec::Core. The mach-o cpu type and subtype can be accessed using the getter functions: uint32_t ArchSpec::GetMachOCPUType () const; uint32_t ArchSpec::GetMachOCPUSubType () const; But these functions are just converting out internal llvm::Triple::ArchSpec + ArchSpec::Core back into mach-o. Same goes for ELF. All code has been updated to deal with the changes. This should abstract us until later when the llvm::TargetSpec stuff gets finalized and we can then adopt it. llvm-svn: 126278
2011-02-23 08:35:02 +08:00
ret.SetErrorStringWithFormat("Unable to find disassembler plug-in for %s architecture.", arch.GetArchitectureName());
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
return ret;
}
if (!process)
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
{
ret.SetErrorToGenericError();
ret.SetErrorString("Couldn't find the process");
return ret;
}
DataExtractor extractor(buffer_sp,
process->GetByteOrder(),
target->GetArchitecture().GetAddressByteSize());
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
if (log)
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
{
log->Printf("Function data has contents:");
extractor.PutToLog (log.get(),
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
0,
extractor.GetByteSize(),
func_remote_addr,
16,
DataExtractor::TypeUInt8);
}
disassembler->DecodeInstructions (Address (func_remote_addr), extractor, 0, UINT32_MAX, false);
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
InstructionList &instruction_list = disassembler->GetInstructionList();
Added the ability to get the min and max instruction byte size for an architecture into ArchSpec: uint32_t ArchSpec::GetMinimumOpcodeByteSize() const; uint32_t ArchSpec::GetMaximumOpcodeByteSize() const; Added an AddressClass to the Instruction class in Disassembler.h. This allows decoded instructions to know know if they are code, code with alternate ISA (thumb), or even data which can be mixed into code. The instruction does have an address, but it is a good idea to cache this value so we don't have to look it up more than once. Fixed an issue in Opcode::SetOpcodeBytes() where the length wasn't getting set. Changed: bool SymbolContextList::AppendIfUnique (const SymbolContext& sc); To: bool SymbolContextList::AppendIfUnique (const SymbolContext& sc, bool merge_symbol_into_function); This function was typically being used when looking up functions and symbols. Now if you lookup a function, then find the symbol, they can be merged into the same symbol context and not cause multiple symbol contexts to appear in a symbol context list that describes the same function. Fixed the SymbolContext not equal operator which was causing mixed mode disassembly to not work ("disassembler --mixed --name main"). Modified the disassembler classes to know about the fact we know, for a given architecture, what the min and max opcode byte sizes are. The InstructionList class was modified to return the max opcode byte size for all of the instructions in its list. These two fixes means when disassemble a list of instructions and dump them and show the opcode bytes, we can format the output more intelligently when showing opcode bytes. This affects any architectures that have varying opcode byte sizes (x86_64 and i386). Knowing the max opcode byte size also helps us to be able to disassemble N instructions without having to re-read data if we didn't read enough bytes. Added the ability to set the architecture for the disassemble command. This means you can easily cross disassemble data for any supported architecture. I also added the ability to specify "thumb" as an architecture so that we can force disassembly into thumb mode when needed. In GDB this was done using a hack of specifying an odd address when disassembling. I don't want to repeat this hack in LLDB, so the auto detection between ARM and thumb is failing, just specify thumb when disassembling: (lldb) disassemble --arch thumb --name main You can also have data in say an x86_64 file executable and disassemble data as any other supported architecture: % lldb a.out Current executable set to 'a.out' (x86_64). (lldb) b main (lldb) run (lldb) disassemble --arch thumb --count 2 --start-address 0x0000000100001080 --bytes 0x100001080: 0xb580 push {r7, lr} 0x100001082: 0xaf00 add r7, sp, #0 Fixed Target::ReadMemory(...) to be able to deal with Address argument object that isn't section offset. When an address object was supplied that was out on the heap or stack, target read memory would fail. Disassembly uses Target::ReadMemory(...), and the example above where we disassembler thumb opcodes in an x86 binary was failing do to this bug. llvm-svn: 128347
2011-03-27 03:14:58 +08:00
const uint32_t max_opcode_byte_size = instruction_list.GetMaxOpcocdeByteSize();
for (size_t instruction_index = 0, num_instructions = instruction_list.GetSize();
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
instruction_index < num_instructions;
++instruction_index)
{
Instruction *instruction = instruction_list.GetInstructionAtIndex(instruction_index).get();
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
instruction->Dump (&stream,
Added the ability to get the min and max instruction byte size for an architecture into ArchSpec: uint32_t ArchSpec::GetMinimumOpcodeByteSize() const; uint32_t ArchSpec::GetMaximumOpcodeByteSize() const; Added an AddressClass to the Instruction class in Disassembler.h. This allows decoded instructions to know know if they are code, code with alternate ISA (thumb), or even data which can be mixed into code. The instruction does have an address, but it is a good idea to cache this value so we don't have to look it up more than once. Fixed an issue in Opcode::SetOpcodeBytes() where the length wasn't getting set. Changed: bool SymbolContextList::AppendIfUnique (const SymbolContext& sc); To: bool SymbolContextList::AppendIfUnique (const SymbolContext& sc, bool merge_symbol_into_function); This function was typically being used when looking up functions and symbols. Now if you lookup a function, then find the symbol, they can be merged into the same symbol context and not cause multiple symbol contexts to appear in a symbol context list that describes the same function. Fixed the SymbolContext not equal operator which was causing mixed mode disassembly to not work ("disassembler --mixed --name main"). Modified the disassembler classes to know about the fact we know, for a given architecture, what the min and max opcode byte sizes are. The InstructionList class was modified to return the max opcode byte size for all of the instructions in its list. These two fixes means when disassemble a list of instructions and dump them and show the opcode bytes, we can format the output more intelligently when showing opcode bytes. This affects any architectures that have varying opcode byte sizes (x86_64 and i386). Knowing the max opcode byte size also helps us to be able to disassemble N instructions without having to re-read data if we didn't read enough bytes. Added the ability to set the architecture for the disassemble command. This means you can easily cross disassemble data for any supported architecture. I also added the ability to specify "thumb" as an architecture so that we can force disassembly into thumb mode when needed. In GDB this was done using a hack of specifying an odd address when disassembling. I don't want to repeat this hack in LLDB, so the auto detection between ARM and thumb is failing, just specify thumb when disassembling: (lldb) disassemble --arch thumb --name main You can also have data in say an x86_64 file executable and disassemble data as any other supported architecture: % lldb a.out Current executable set to 'a.out' (x86_64). (lldb) b main (lldb) run (lldb) disassemble --arch thumb --count 2 --start-address 0x0000000100001080 --bytes 0x100001080: 0xb580 push {r7, lr} 0x100001082: 0xaf00 add r7, sp, #0 Fixed Target::ReadMemory(...) to be able to deal with Address argument object that isn't section offset. When an address object was supplied that was out on the heap or stack, target read memory would fail. Disassembly uses Target::ReadMemory(...), and the example above where we disassembler thumb opcodes in an x86 binary was failing do to this bug. llvm-svn: 128347
2011-03-27 03:14:58 +08:00
max_opcode_byte_size,
true,
true,
&exe_ctx);
This is a major refactoring of the expression parser. The goal is to separate the parser's data from the data belonging to the parser's clients. This allows clients to use the parser to obtain (for example) a JIT compiled function or some DWARF code, and then discard the parser state. Previously, parser state was held in ClangExpression and used liberally by ClangFunction, which inherited from ClangExpression. The main effects of this refactoring are: - reducing ClangExpression to an abstract class that declares methods that any client must expose to the expression parser, - moving the code specific to implementing the "expr" command from ClangExpression and CommandObjectExpression into ClangUserExpression, a new class, - moving the common parser interaction code from ClangExpression into ClangExpressionParser, a new class, and - making ClangFunction rely only on ClangExpressionParser and not depend on the internal implementation of ClangExpression. Side effects include: - the compiler interaction code has been factored out of ClangFunction and is now in an AST pass (ASTStructExtractor), - the header file for ClangFunction is now fully documented, - several bugs that only popped up when Clang was deallocated (which never happened, since the lifetime of the compiler was essentially infinite) are now fixed, and - the developer-only "call" command has been disabled. I have tested the expr command and the Objective-C step-into code, which use ClangUserExpression and ClangFunction, respectively, and verified that they work. Please let me know if you encounter bugs or poor documentation. llvm-svn: 112249
2010-08-27 09:01:44 +08:00
stream.PutChar('\n');
}
return ret;
}