Recommit r317351 : Add CallSiteSplitting pass
This recommit r317351 after fixing a buildbot failure.
Original commit message:
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :
1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.
Split from :
if (!ptr || c)
callee(ptr);
to :
if (!ptr)
callee(null ptr) // set the known constant value
else if (c)
callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2-split1
BB2-split0:
call void @bar(i32 0)
br label %BB2
BB2-split1:
call void @bar(i32 1)
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]
llvm-svn: 317362
2017-11-04 04:41:16 +08:00
|
|
|
//===- CallSiteSplitting.cpp ----------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
|
|
|
|
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// This file implements a transformation that tries to split a call-site to pass
|
|
|
|
// more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
|
|
|
|
// so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
|
|
|
|
// threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
|
|
|
|
// As of now we support two cases :
|
|
|
|
//
|
2017-12-24 04:02:26 +08:00
|
|
|
// 1) Try to a split call-site with constrained arguments, if any constraints
|
|
|
|
// on any argument can be found by following the single predecessors of the
|
|
|
|
// all site's predecessors. Currently this pass only handles call-sites with 2
|
|
|
|
// predecessors. For example, in the code below, we try to split the call-site
|
|
|
|
// since we can predicate the argument(ptr) based on the OR condition.
|
Recommit r317351 : Add CallSiteSplitting pass
This recommit r317351 after fixing a buildbot failure.
Original commit message:
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :
1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.
Split from :
if (!ptr || c)
callee(ptr);
to :
if (!ptr)
callee(null ptr) // set the known constant value
else if (c)
callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2-split1
BB2-split0:
call void @bar(i32 0)
br label %BB2
BB2-split1:
call void @bar(i32 1)
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]
llvm-svn: 317362
2017-11-04 04:41:16 +08:00
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// Split from :
|
|
|
|
// if (!ptr || c)
|
|
|
|
// callee(ptr);
|
|
|
|
// to :
|
|
|
|
// if (!ptr)
|
|
|
|
// callee(null) // set the known constant value
|
|
|
|
// else if (c)
|
|
|
|
// callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// 2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
|
|
|
|
// For example,
|
|
|
|
// from :
|
|
|
|
// Header:
|
|
|
|
// %c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
|
|
|
|
// br i1 %c, label %Tail, label %TBB
|
|
|
|
// TBB:
|
|
|
|
// br label Tail%
|
|
|
|
// Tail:
|
|
|
|
// %p = phi i32 [ 0, %Header], [ 1, %TBB]
|
|
|
|
// call void @bar(i32 %p)
|
|
|
|
// to
|
|
|
|
// Header:
|
|
|
|
// %c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
|
|
|
|
// br i1 %c, label %Tail-split0, label %TBB
|
|
|
|
// TBB:
|
|
|
|
// br label %Tail-split1
|
|
|
|
// Tail-split0:
|
|
|
|
// call void @bar(i32 0)
|
|
|
|
// br label %Tail
|
|
|
|
// Tail-split1:
|
|
|
|
// call void @bar(i32 1)
|
|
|
|
// br label %Tail
|
|
|
|
// Tail:
|
|
|
|
// %p = phi i32 [ 0, %Tail-split0 ], [ 1, %Tail-split1 ]
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar/CallSiteSplitting.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/TargetLibraryInfo.h"
|
2018-02-14 21:59:12 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/TargetTransformInfo.h"
|
2018-03-22 06:34:23 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Analysis/Utils/Local.h"
|
Recommit r317351 : Add CallSiteSplitting pass
This recommit r317351 after fixing a buildbot failure.
Original commit message:
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :
1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.
Split from :
if (!ptr || c)
callee(ptr);
to :
if (!ptr)
callee(null ptr) // set the known constant value
else if (c)
callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2-split1
BB2-split0:
call void @bar(i32 0)
br label %BB2
BB2-split1:
call void @bar(i32 1)
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]
llvm-svn: 317362
2017-11-04 04:41:16 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/IntrinsicInst.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/PatternMatch.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.h"
|
2018-02-14 21:59:12 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/Cloning.h"
|
Recommit r317351 : Add CallSiteSplitting pass
This recommit r317351 after fixing a buildbot failure.
Original commit message:
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :
1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.
Split from :
if (!ptr || c)
callee(ptr);
to :
if (!ptr)
callee(null ptr) // set the known constant value
else if (c)
callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2-split1
BB2-split0:
call void @bar(i32 0)
br label %BB2
BB2-split1:
call void @bar(i32 1)
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]
llvm-svn: 317362
2017-11-04 04:41:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
using namespace llvm;
|
|
|
|
using namespace PatternMatch;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define DEBUG_TYPE "callsite-splitting"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STATISTIC(NumCallSiteSplit, "Number of call-site split");
|
|
|
|
|
2018-02-14 21:59:12 +08:00
|
|
|
/// Only allow instructions before a call, if their CodeSize cost is below
|
|
|
|
/// DuplicationThreshold. Those instructions need to be duplicated in all
|
|
|
|
/// split blocks.
|
|
|
|
static cl::opt<unsigned>
|
|
|
|
DuplicationThreshold("callsite-splitting-duplication-threshold", cl::Hidden,
|
|
|
|
cl::desc("Only allow instructions before a call, if "
|
|
|
|
"their cost is below DuplicationThreshold"),
|
|
|
|
cl::init(5));
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-17 06:13:15 +08:00
|
|
|
static void addNonNullAttribute(CallSite CS, Value *Op) {
|
Recommit r317351 : Add CallSiteSplitting pass
This recommit r317351 after fixing a buildbot failure.
Original commit message:
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :
1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.
Split from :
if (!ptr || c)
callee(ptr);
to :
if (!ptr)
callee(null ptr) // set the known constant value
else if (c)
callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2-split1
BB2-split0:
call void @bar(i32 0)
br label %BB2
BB2-split1:
call void @bar(i32 1)
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]
llvm-svn: 317362
2017-11-04 04:41:16 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned ArgNo = 0;
|
|
|
|
for (auto &I : CS.args()) {
|
|
|
|
if (&*I == Op)
|
|
|
|
CS.addParamAttr(ArgNo, Attribute::NonNull);
|
|
|
|
++ArgNo;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-17 06:13:15 +08:00
|
|
|
static void setConstantInArgument(CallSite CS, Value *Op,
|
|
|
|
Constant *ConstValue) {
|
Recommit r317351 : Add CallSiteSplitting pass
This recommit r317351 after fixing a buildbot failure.
Original commit message:
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :
1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.
Split from :
if (!ptr || c)
callee(ptr);
to :
if (!ptr)
callee(null ptr) // set the known constant value
else if (c)
callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2-split1
BB2-split0:
call void @bar(i32 0)
br label %BB2
BB2-split1:
call void @bar(i32 1)
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]
llvm-svn: 317362
2017-11-04 04:41:16 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned ArgNo = 0;
|
|
|
|
for (auto &I : CS.args()) {
|
|
|
|
if (&*I == Op)
|
|
|
|
CS.setArgument(ArgNo, ConstValue);
|
|
|
|
++ArgNo;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-11-19 02:14:13 +08:00
|
|
|
static bool isCondRelevantToAnyCallArgument(ICmpInst *Cmp, CallSite CS) {
|
|
|
|
assert(isa<Constant>(Cmp->getOperand(1)) && "Expected a constant operand.");
|
|
|
|
Value *Op0 = Cmp->getOperand(0);
|
|
|
|
unsigned ArgNo = 0;
|
|
|
|
for (CallSite::arg_iterator I = CS.arg_begin(), E = CS.arg_end(); I != E;
|
|
|
|
++I, ++ArgNo) {
|
|
|
|
// Don't consider constant or arguments that are already known non-null.
|
|
|
|
if (isa<Constant>(*I) || CS.paramHasAttr(ArgNo, Attribute::NonNull))
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (*I == Op0)
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-17 06:13:15 +08:00
|
|
|
typedef std::pair<ICmpInst *, unsigned> ConditionTy;
|
|
|
|
typedef SmallVector<ConditionTy, 2> ConditionsTy;
|
|
|
|
|
2017-12-13 11:05:20 +08:00
|
|
|
/// If From has a conditional jump to To, add the condition to Conditions,
|
|
|
|
/// if it is relevant to any argument at CS.
|
2018-01-17 06:13:15 +08:00
|
|
|
static void recordCondition(CallSite CS, BasicBlock *From, BasicBlock *To,
|
|
|
|
ConditionsTy &Conditions) {
|
2017-12-13 11:05:20 +08:00
|
|
|
auto *BI = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(From->getTerminator());
|
|
|
|
if (!BI || !BI->isConditional())
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CmpInst::Predicate Pred;
|
|
|
|
Value *Cond = BI->getCondition();
|
|
|
|
if (!match(Cond, m_ICmp(Pred, m_Value(), m_Constant())))
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICmpInst *Cmp = cast<ICmpInst>(Cond);
|
|
|
|
if (Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ || Pred == ICmpInst::ICMP_NE)
|
|
|
|
if (isCondRelevantToAnyCallArgument(Cmp, CS))
|
|
|
|
Conditions.push_back({Cmp, From->getTerminator()->getSuccessor(0) == To
|
|
|
|
? Pred
|
|
|
|
: Cmp->getInversePredicate()});
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-11-19 02:14:13 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-12-13 11:05:20 +08:00
|
|
|
/// Record ICmp conditions relevant to any argument in CS following Pred's
|
|
|
|
/// single successors. If there are conflicting conditions along a path, like
|
|
|
|
/// x == 1 and x == 0, the first condition will be used.
|
2018-01-17 06:13:15 +08:00
|
|
|
static void recordConditions(CallSite CS, BasicBlock *Pred,
|
|
|
|
ConditionsTy &Conditions) {
|
2017-12-13 11:05:20 +08:00
|
|
|
recordCondition(CS, Pred, CS.getInstruction()->getParent(), Conditions);
|
|
|
|
BasicBlock *From = Pred;
|
|
|
|
BasicBlock *To = Pred;
|
2018-01-26 18:36:50 +08:00
|
|
|
SmallPtrSet<BasicBlock *, 4> Visited;
|
2017-12-13 11:05:20 +08:00
|
|
|
while (!Visited.count(From->getSinglePredecessor()) &&
|
|
|
|
(From = From->getSinglePredecessor())) {
|
|
|
|
recordCondition(CS, From, To, Conditions);
|
2018-01-26 18:36:50 +08:00
|
|
|
Visited.insert(From);
|
2017-12-13 11:05:20 +08:00
|
|
|
To = From;
|
2017-11-19 02:14:13 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-17 06:13:15 +08:00
|
|
|
static void addConditions(CallSite CS, const ConditionsTy &Conditions) {
|
2017-12-13 11:05:20 +08:00
|
|
|
for (auto &Cond : Conditions) {
|
|
|
|
Value *Arg = Cond.first->getOperand(0);
|
|
|
|
Constant *ConstVal = cast<Constant>(Cond.first->getOperand(1));
|
|
|
|
if (Cond.second == ICmpInst::ICMP_EQ)
|
2018-01-17 06:13:15 +08:00
|
|
|
setConstantInArgument(CS, Arg, ConstVal);
|
2017-12-13 11:05:20 +08:00
|
|
|
else if (ConstVal->getType()->isPointerTy() && ConstVal->isNullValue()) {
|
|
|
|
assert(Cond.second == ICmpInst::ICMP_NE);
|
2018-01-17 06:13:15 +08:00
|
|
|
addNonNullAttribute(CS, Arg);
|
Recommit r317351 : Add CallSiteSplitting pass
This recommit r317351 after fixing a buildbot failure.
Original commit message:
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :
1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.
Split from :
if (!ptr || c)
callee(ptr);
to :
if (!ptr)
callee(null ptr) // set the known constant value
else if (c)
callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2-split1
BB2-split0:
call void @bar(i32 0)
br label %BB2
BB2-split1:
call void @bar(i32 1)
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]
llvm-svn: 317362
2017-11-04 04:41:16 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-12-13 11:05:20 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static SmallVector<BasicBlock *, 2> getTwoPredecessors(BasicBlock *BB) {
|
|
|
|
SmallVector<BasicBlock *, 2> Preds(predecessors((BB)));
|
|
|
|
assert(Preds.size() == 2 && "Expected exactly 2 predecessors!");
|
|
|
|
return Preds;
|
Recommit r317351 : Add CallSiteSplitting pass
This recommit r317351 after fixing a buildbot failure.
Original commit message:
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :
1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.
Split from :
if (!ptr || c)
callee(ptr);
to :
if (!ptr)
callee(null ptr) // set the known constant value
else if (c)
callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2-split1
BB2-split0:
call void @bar(i32 0)
br label %BB2
BB2-split1:
call void @bar(i32 1)
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]
llvm-svn: 317362
2017-11-04 04:41:16 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-02-14 21:59:12 +08:00
|
|
|
static bool canSplitCallSite(CallSite CS, TargetTransformInfo &TTI) {
|
Recommit r317351 : Add CallSiteSplitting pass
This recommit r317351 after fixing a buildbot failure.
Original commit message:
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :
1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.
Split from :
if (!ptr || c)
callee(ptr);
to :
if (!ptr)
callee(null ptr) // set the known constant value
else if (c)
callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2-split1
BB2-split0:
call void @bar(i32 0)
br label %BB2
BB2-split1:
call void @bar(i32 1)
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]
llvm-svn: 317362
2017-11-04 04:41:16 +08:00
|
|
|
// FIXME: As of now we handle only CallInst. InvokeInst could be handled
|
|
|
|
// without too much effort.
|
|
|
|
Instruction *Instr = CS.getInstruction();
|
|
|
|
if (!isa<CallInst>(Instr))
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BasicBlock *CallSiteBB = Instr->getParent();
|
2018-02-14 21:59:12 +08:00
|
|
|
// Allow splitting a call-site only when the CodeSize cost of the
|
|
|
|
// instructions before the call is less then DuplicationThreshold. The
|
|
|
|
// instructions before the call will be duplicated in the split blocks and
|
|
|
|
// corresponding uses will be updated.
|
|
|
|
unsigned Cost = 0;
|
|
|
|
for (auto &InstBeforeCall :
|
|
|
|
llvm::make_range(CallSiteBB->begin(), Instr->getIterator())) {
|
|
|
|
Cost += TTI.getInstructionCost(&InstBeforeCall,
|
|
|
|
TargetTransformInfo::TCK_CodeSize);
|
|
|
|
if (Cost >= DuplicationThreshold)
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
Recommit r317351 : Add CallSiteSplitting pass
This recommit r317351 after fixing a buildbot failure.
Original commit message:
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :
1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.
Split from :
if (!ptr || c)
callee(ptr);
to :
if (!ptr)
callee(null ptr) // set the known constant value
else if (c)
callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2-split1
BB2-split0:
call void @bar(i32 0)
br label %BB2
BB2-split1:
call void @bar(i32 1)
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]
llvm-svn: 317362
2017-11-04 04:41:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-11-19 02:14:13 +08:00
|
|
|
// Need 2 predecessors and cannot split an edge from an IndirectBrInst.
|
|
|
|
SmallVector<BasicBlock *, 2> Preds(predecessors(CallSiteBB));
|
|
|
|
if (Preds.size() != 2 || isa<IndirectBrInst>(Preds[0]->getTerminator()) ||
|
Recommit r317351 : Add CallSiteSplitting pass
This recommit r317351 after fixing a buildbot failure.
Original commit message:
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :
1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.
Split from :
if (!ptr || c)
callee(ptr);
to :
if (!ptr)
callee(null ptr) // set the known constant value
else if (c)
callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2-split1
BB2-split0:
call void @bar(i32 0)
br label %BB2
BB2-split1:
call void @bar(i32 1)
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]
llvm-svn: 317362
2017-11-04 04:41:16 +08:00
|
|
|
isa<IndirectBrInst>(Preds[1]->getTerminator()))
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
|
2018-04-05 12:16:23 +08:00
|
|
|
// Do not split a call-site in an exception handling block. This check
|
|
|
|
// prevents triggering an assertion in SplitEdge used via
|
|
|
|
// DuplicateInstructionsInSplitBetween.
|
|
|
|
if (CallSiteBB->isEHPad())
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
|
Recommit r317351 : Add CallSiteSplitting pass
This recommit r317351 after fixing a buildbot failure.
Original commit message:
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :
1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.
Split from :
if (!ptr || c)
callee(ptr);
to :
if (!ptr)
callee(null ptr) // set the known constant value
else if (c)
callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2-split1
BB2-split0:
call void @bar(i32 0)
br label %BB2
BB2-split1:
call void @bar(i32 1)
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]
llvm-svn: 317362
2017-11-04 04:41:16 +08:00
|
|
|
return CallSiteBB->canSplitPredecessors();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-04 05:40:14 +08:00
|
|
|
static Instruction *cloneInstForMustTail(Instruction *I, Instruction *Before,
|
|
|
|
Value *V) {
|
|
|
|
Instruction *Copy = I->clone();
|
|
|
|
Copy->setName(I->getName());
|
|
|
|
Copy->insertBefore(Before);
|
|
|
|
if (V)
|
|
|
|
Copy->setOperand(0, V);
|
|
|
|
return Copy;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/// Copy mandatory `musttail` return sequence that follows original `CI`, and
|
|
|
|
/// link it up to `NewCI` value instead:
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// * (optional) `bitcast NewCI to ...`
|
|
|
|
/// * `ret bitcast or NewCI`
|
2018-01-17 06:13:15 +08:00
|
|
|
///
|
2018-03-04 05:40:14 +08:00
|
|
|
/// Insert this sequence right before `SplitBB`'s terminator, which will be
|
|
|
|
/// cleaned up later in `splitCallSite` below.
|
|
|
|
static void copyMustTailReturn(BasicBlock *SplitBB, Instruction *CI,
|
|
|
|
Instruction *NewCI) {
|
|
|
|
bool IsVoid = SplitBB->getParent()->getReturnType()->isVoidTy();
|
|
|
|
auto II = std::next(CI->getIterator());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BitCastInst* BCI = dyn_cast<BitCastInst>(&*II);
|
|
|
|
if (BCI)
|
|
|
|
++II;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ReturnInst* RI = dyn_cast<ReturnInst>(&*II);
|
|
|
|
assert(RI && "`musttail` call must be followed by `ret` instruction");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TerminatorInst *TI = SplitBB->getTerminator();
|
|
|
|
Value *V = NewCI;
|
|
|
|
if (BCI)
|
|
|
|
V = cloneInstForMustTail(BCI, TI, V);
|
|
|
|
cloneInstForMustTail(RI, TI, IsVoid ? nullptr : V);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// FIXME: remove TI here, `DuplicateInstructionsInSplitBetween` has a bug
|
|
|
|
// that prevents doing this now.
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-17 06:13:15 +08:00
|
|
|
/// For each (predecessor, conditions from predecessors) pair, it will split the
|
|
|
|
/// basic block containing the call site, hook it up to the predecessor and
|
|
|
|
/// replace the call instruction with new call instructions, which contain
|
|
|
|
/// constraints based on the conditions from their predecessors.
|
2017-12-24 04:02:26 +08:00
|
|
|
/// For example, in the IR below with an OR condition, the call-site can
|
2018-01-17 06:13:15 +08:00
|
|
|
/// be split. In this case, Preds for Tail is [(Header, a == null),
|
|
|
|
/// (TBB, a != null, b == null)]. Tail is replaced by 2 split blocks, containing
|
|
|
|
/// CallInst1, which has constraints based on the conditions from Head and
|
|
|
|
/// CallInst2, which has constraints based on the conditions coming from TBB.
|
Recommit r317351 : Add CallSiteSplitting pass
This recommit r317351 after fixing a buildbot failure.
Original commit message:
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :
1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.
Split from :
if (!ptr || c)
callee(ptr);
to :
if (!ptr)
callee(null ptr) // set the known constant value
else if (c)
callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2-split1
BB2-split0:
call void @bar(i32 0)
br label %BB2
BB2-split1:
call void @bar(i32 1)
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]
llvm-svn: 317362
2017-11-04 04:41:16 +08:00
|
|
|
///
|
2017-12-24 04:02:26 +08:00
|
|
|
/// From :
|
Recommit r317351 : Add CallSiteSplitting pass
This recommit r317351 after fixing a buildbot failure.
Original commit message:
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :
1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.
Split from :
if (!ptr || c)
callee(ptr);
to :
if (!ptr)
callee(null ptr) // set the known constant value
else if (c)
callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2-split1
BB2-split0:
call void @bar(i32 0)
br label %BB2
BB2-split1:
call void @bar(i32 1)
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]
llvm-svn: 317362
2017-11-04 04:41:16 +08:00
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// Header:
|
|
|
|
/// %c = icmp eq i32* %a, null
|
|
|
|
/// br i1 %c %Tail, %TBB
|
|
|
|
/// TBB:
|
|
|
|
/// %c2 = icmp eq i32* %b, null
|
|
|
|
/// br i1 %c %Tail, %End
|
|
|
|
/// Tail:
|
|
|
|
/// %ca = call i1 @callee (i32* %a, i32* %b)
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// to :
|
|
|
|
///
|
|
|
|
/// Header: // PredBB1 is Header
|
|
|
|
/// %c = icmp eq i32* %a, null
|
|
|
|
/// br i1 %c %Tail-split1, %TBB
|
|
|
|
/// TBB: // PredBB2 is TBB
|
|
|
|
/// %c2 = icmp eq i32* %b, null
|
|
|
|
/// br i1 %c %Tail-split2, %End
|
|
|
|
/// Tail-split1:
|
|
|
|
/// %ca1 = call @callee (i32* null, i32* %b) // CallInst1
|
|
|
|
/// br %Tail
|
|
|
|
/// Tail-split2:
|
|
|
|
/// %ca2 = call @callee (i32* nonnull %a, i32* null) // CallInst2
|
|
|
|
/// br %Tail
|
|
|
|
/// Tail:
|
|
|
|
/// %p = phi i1 [%ca1, %Tail-split1],[%ca2, %Tail-split2]
|
|
|
|
///
|
2017-12-24 04:02:26 +08:00
|
|
|
/// Note that in case any arguments at the call-site are constrained by its
|
|
|
|
/// predecessors, new call-sites with more constrained arguments will be
|
|
|
|
/// created in createCallSitesOnPredicatedArgument().
|
2018-01-17 06:13:15 +08:00
|
|
|
static void splitCallSite(
|
|
|
|
CallSite CS,
|
2018-03-22 23:23:33 +08:00
|
|
|
const SmallVectorImpl<std::pair<BasicBlock *, ConditionsTy>> &Preds,
|
|
|
|
DominatorTree *DT) {
|
Recommit r317351 : Add CallSiteSplitting pass
This recommit r317351 after fixing a buildbot failure.
Original commit message:
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :
1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.
Split from :
if (!ptr || c)
callee(ptr);
to :
if (!ptr)
callee(null ptr) // set the known constant value
else if (c)
callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2-split1
BB2-split0:
call void @bar(i32 0)
br label %BB2
BB2-split1:
call void @bar(i32 1)
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]
llvm-svn: 317362
2017-11-04 04:41:16 +08:00
|
|
|
Instruction *Instr = CS.getInstruction();
|
|
|
|
BasicBlock *TailBB = Instr->getParent();
|
2018-03-04 05:40:14 +08:00
|
|
|
bool IsMustTailCall = CS.isMustTailCall();
|
Recommit r317351 : Add CallSiteSplitting pass
This recommit r317351 after fixing a buildbot failure.
Original commit message:
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :
1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.
Split from :
if (!ptr || c)
callee(ptr);
to :
if (!ptr)
callee(null ptr) // set the known constant value
else if (c)
callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2-split1
BB2-split0:
call void @bar(i32 0)
br label %BB2
BB2-split1:
call void @bar(i32 1)
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]
llvm-svn: 317362
2017-11-04 04:41:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-01-17 06:13:15 +08:00
|
|
|
PHINode *CallPN = nullptr;
|
2018-03-04 05:40:14 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// `musttail` calls must be followed by optional `bitcast`, and `ret`. The
|
|
|
|
// split blocks will be terminated right after that so there're no users for
|
|
|
|
// this phi in a `TailBB`.
|
2018-03-13 02:40:59 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!IsMustTailCall && !Instr->use_empty())
|
2018-01-17 06:13:15 +08:00
|
|
|
CallPN = PHINode::Create(Instr->getType(), Preds.size(), "phi.call");
|
Recommit r317351 : Add CallSiteSplitting pass
This recommit r317351 after fixing a buildbot failure.
Original commit message:
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :
1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.
Split from :
if (!ptr || c)
callee(ptr);
to :
if (!ptr)
callee(null ptr) // set the known constant value
else if (c)
callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2-split1
BB2-split0:
call void @bar(i32 0)
br label %BB2
BB2-split1:
call void @bar(i32 1)
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]
llvm-svn: 317362
2017-11-04 04:41:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-01-17 06:13:15 +08:00
|
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << "split call-site : " << *Instr << " into \n");
|
2018-02-14 21:59:12 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert(Preds.size() == 2 && "The ValueToValueMaps array has size 2.");
|
|
|
|
// ValueToValueMapTy is neither copy nor moveable, so we use a simple array
|
|
|
|
// here.
|
|
|
|
ValueToValueMapTy ValueToValueMaps[2];
|
|
|
|
for (unsigned i = 0; i < Preds.size(); i++) {
|
|
|
|
BasicBlock *PredBB = Preds[i].first;
|
|
|
|
BasicBlock *SplitBlock = DuplicateInstructionsInSplitBetween(
|
2018-03-22 23:23:33 +08:00
|
|
|
TailBB, PredBB, &*std::next(Instr->getIterator()), ValueToValueMaps[i],
|
|
|
|
DT);
|
2018-01-17 06:13:15 +08:00
|
|
|
assert(SplitBlock && "Unexpected new basic block split.");
|
|
|
|
|
2018-02-14 21:59:12 +08:00
|
|
|
Instruction *NewCI =
|
|
|
|
&*std::prev(SplitBlock->getTerminator()->getIterator());
|
2018-01-17 06:13:15 +08:00
|
|
|
CallSite NewCS(NewCI);
|
2018-02-14 21:59:12 +08:00
|
|
|
addConditions(NewCS, Preds[i].second);
|
2018-01-17 06:13:15 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Handle PHIs used as arguments in the call-site.
|
|
|
|
for (PHINode &PN : TailBB->phis()) {
|
|
|
|
unsigned ArgNo = 0;
|
|
|
|
for (auto &CI : CS.args()) {
|
|
|
|
if (&*CI == &PN) {
|
|
|
|
NewCS.setArgument(ArgNo, PN.getIncomingValueForBlock(SplitBlock));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
++ArgNo;
|
Recommit r317351 : Add CallSiteSplitting pass
This recommit r317351 after fixing a buildbot failure.
Original commit message:
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :
1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.
Split from :
if (!ptr || c)
callee(ptr);
to :
if (!ptr)
callee(null ptr) // set the known constant value
else if (c)
callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2-split1
BB2-split0:
call void @bar(i32 0)
br label %BB2
BB2-split1:
call void @bar(i32 1)
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]
llvm-svn: 317362
2017-11-04 04:41:16 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-01-17 06:13:15 +08:00
|
|
|
DEBUG(dbgs() << " " << *NewCI << " in " << SplitBlock->getName()
|
|
|
|
<< "\n");
|
|
|
|
if (CallPN)
|
|
|
|
CallPN->addIncoming(NewCI, SplitBlock);
|
2018-03-04 05:40:14 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Clone and place bitcast and return instructions before `TI`
|
|
|
|
if (IsMustTailCall)
|
|
|
|
copyMustTailReturn(SplitBlock, Instr, NewCI);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NumCallSiteSplit++;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// FIXME: remove TI in `copyMustTailReturn`
|
|
|
|
if (IsMustTailCall) {
|
|
|
|
// Remove superfluous `br` terminators from the end of the Split blocks
|
2018-03-04 06:34:38 +08:00
|
|
|
// NOTE: Removing terminator removes the SplitBlock from the TailBB's
|
|
|
|
// predecessors. Therefore we must get complete list of Splits before
|
|
|
|
// attempting removal.
|
|
|
|
SmallVector<BasicBlock *, 2> Splits(predecessors((TailBB)));
|
|
|
|
assert(Splits.size() == 2 && "Expected exactly 2 splits!");
|
|
|
|
for (unsigned i = 0; i < Splits.size(); i++)
|
|
|
|
Splits[i]->getTerminator()->eraseFromParent();
|
2018-03-04 05:40:14 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Erase the tail block once done with musttail patching
|
|
|
|
TailBB->eraseFromParent();
|
|
|
|
return;
|
Recommit r317351 : Add CallSiteSplitting pass
This recommit r317351 after fixing a buildbot failure.
Original commit message:
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :
1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.
Split from :
if (!ptr || c)
callee(ptr);
to :
if (!ptr)
callee(null ptr) // set the known constant value
else if (c)
callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2-split1
BB2-split0:
call void @bar(i32 0)
br label %BB2
BB2-split1:
call void @bar(i32 1)
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]
llvm-svn: 317362
2017-11-04 04:41:16 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-02-14 21:59:12 +08:00
|
|
|
auto *OriginalBegin = &*TailBB->begin();
|
Recommit r317351 : Add CallSiteSplitting pass
This recommit r317351 after fixing a buildbot failure.
Original commit message:
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :
1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.
Split from :
if (!ptr || c)
callee(ptr);
to :
if (!ptr)
callee(null ptr) // set the known constant value
else if (c)
callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2-split1
BB2-split0:
call void @bar(i32 0)
br label %BB2
BB2-split1:
call void @bar(i32 1)
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]
llvm-svn: 317362
2017-11-04 04:41:16 +08:00
|
|
|
// Replace users of the original call with a PHI mering call-sites split.
|
2018-01-17 06:13:15 +08:00
|
|
|
if (CallPN) {
|
2018-02-14 21:59:12 +08:00
|
|
|
CallPN->insertBefore(OriginalBegin);
|
2018-01-17 06:13:15 +08:00
|
|
|
Instr->replaceAllUsesWith(CallPN);
|
Recommit r317351 : Add CallSiteSplitting pass
This recommit r317351 after fixing a buildbot failure.
Original commit message:
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :
1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.
Split from :
if (!ptr || c)
callee(ptr);
to :
if (!ptr)
callee(null ptr) // set the known constant value
else if (c)
callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2-split1
BB2-split0:
call void @bar(i32 0)
br label %BB2
BB2-split1:
call void @bar(i32 1)
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]
llvm-svn: 317362
2017-11-04 04:41:16 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-01-17 06:13:15 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-02-14 21:59:12 +08:00
|
|
|
// Remove instructions moved to split blocks from TailBB, from the duplicated
|
|
|
|
// call instruction to the beginning of the basic block. If an instruction
|
|
|
|
// has any uses, add a new PHI node to combine the values coming from the
|
|
|
|
// split blocks. The new PHI nodes are placed before the first original
|
|
|
|
// instruction, so we do not end up deleting them. By using reverse-order, we
|
|
|
|
// do not introduce unnecessary PHI nodes for def-use chains from the call
|
|
|
|
// instruction to the beginning of the block.
|
|
|
|
auto I = Instr->getReverseIterator();
|
|
|
|
while (I != TailBB->rend()) {
|
|
|
|
Instruction *CurrentI = &*I++;
|
|
|
|
if (!CurrentI->use_empty()) {
|
|
|
|
// If an existing PHI has users after the call, there is no need to create
|
|
|
|
// a new one.
|
|
|
|
if (isa<PHINode>(CurrentI))
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
PHINode *NewPN = PHINode::Create(CurrentI->getType(), Preds.size());
|
|
|
|
for (auto &Mapping : ValueToValueMaps)
|
|
|
|
NewPN->addIncoming(Mapping[CurrentI],
|
|
|
|
cast<Instruction>(Mapping[CurrentI])->getParent());
|
|
|
|
NewPN->insertBefore(&*TailBB->begin());
|
|
|
|
CurrentI->replaceAllUsesWith(NewPN);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
CurrentI->eraseFromParent();
|
|
|
|
// We are done once we handled the first original instruction in TailBB.
|
|
|
|
if (CurrentI == OriginalBegin)
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
Recommit r317351 : Add CallSiteSplitting pass
This recommit r317351 after fixing a buildbot failure.
Original commit message:
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :
1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.
Split from :
if (!ptr || c)
callee(ptr);
to :
if (!ptr)
callee(null ptr) // set the known constant value
else if (c)
callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2-split1
BB2-split0:
call void @bar(i32 0)
br label %BB2
BB2-split1:
call void @bar(i32 1)
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]
llvm-svn: 317362
2017-11-04 04:41:16 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Return true if the call-site has an argument which is a PHI with only
|
|
|
|
// constant incoming values.
|
|
|
|
static bool isPredicatedOnPHI(CallSite CS) {
|
|
|
|
Instruction *Instr = CS.getInstruction();
|
|
|
|
BasicBlock *Parent = Instr->getParent();
|
2017-12-12 15:29:57 +08:00
|
|
|
if (Instr != Parent->getFirstNonPHIOrDbg())
|
Recommit r317351 : Add CallSiteSplitting pass
This recommit r317351 after fixing a buildbot failure.
Original commit message:
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :
1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.
Split from :
if (!ptr || c)
callee(ptr);
to :
if (!ptr)
callee(null ptr) // set the known constant value
else if (c)
callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2-split1
BB2-split0:
call void @bar(i32 0)
br label %BB2
BB2-split1:
call void @bar(i32 1)
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]
llvm-svn: 317362
2017-11-04 04:41:16 +08:00
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (auto &BI : *Parent) {
|
|
|
|
if (PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(&BI)) {
|
|
|
|
for (auto &I : CS.args())
|
|
|
|
if (&*I == PN) {
|
|
|
|
assert(PN->getNumIncomingValues() == 2 &&
|
|
|
|
"Unexpected number of incoming values");
|
|
|
|
if (PN->getIncomingBlock(0) == PN->getIncomingBlock(1))
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
if (PN->getIncomingValue(0) == PN->getIncomingValue(1))
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
if (isa<Constant>(PN->getIncomingValue(0)) &&
|
|
|
|
isa<Constant>(PN->getIncomingValue(1)))
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-22 23:23:33 +08:00
|
|
|
static bool tryToSplitOnPHIPredicatedArgument(CallSite CS, DominatorTree *DT) {
|
2017-11-19 02:14:13 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!isPredicatedOnPHI(CS))
|
Recommit r317351 : Add CallSiteSplitting pass
This recommit r317351 after fixing a buildbot failure.
Original commit message:
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :
1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.
Split from :
if (!ptr || c)
callee(ptr);
to :
if (!ptr)
callee(null ptr) // set the known constant value
else if (c)
callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2-split1
BB2-split0:
call void @bar(i32 0)
br label %BB2
BB2-split1:
call void @bar(i32 1)
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]
llvm-svn: 317362
2017-11-04 04:41:16 +08:00
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
|
2017-11-19 02:14:13 +08:00
|
|
|
auto Preds = getTwoPredecessors(CS.getInstruction()->getParent());
|
2018-01-17 06:13:15 +08:00
|
|
|
SmallVector<std::pair<BasicBlock *, ConditionsTy>, 2> PredsCS = {
|
|
|
|
{Preds[0], {}}, {Preds[1], {}}};
|
2018-03-22 23:23:33 +08:00
|
|
|
splitCallSite(CS, PredsCS, DT);
|
Recommit r317351 : Add CallSiteSplitting pass
This recommit r317351 after fixing a buildbot failure.
Original commit message:
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :
1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.
Split from :
if (!ptr || c)
callee(ptr);
to :
if (!ptr)
callee(null ptr) // set the known constant value
else if (c)
callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2-split1
BB2-split0:
call void @bar(i32 0)
br label %BB2
BB2-split1:
call void @bar(i32 1)
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]
llvm-svn: 317362
2017-11-04 04:41:16 +08:00
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-22 23:23:33 +08:00
|
|
|
static bool tryToSplitOnPredicatedArgument(CallSite CS, DominatorTree *DT) {
|
2017-11-19 02:14:13 +08:00
|
|
|
auto Preds = getTwoPredecessors(CS.getInstruction()->getParent());
|
2017-12-24 04:02:26 +08:00
|
|
|
if (Preds[0] == Preds[1])
|
Recommit r317351 : Add CallSiteSplitting pass
This recommit r317351 after fixing a buildbot failure.
Original commit message:
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :
1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.
Split from :
if (!ptr || c)
callee(ptr);
to :
if (!ptr)
callee(null ptr) // set the known constant value
else if (c)
callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2-split1
BB2-split0:
call void @bar(i32 0)
br label %BB2
BB2-split1:
call void @bar(i32 1)
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]
llvm-svn: 317362
2017-11-04 04:41:16 +08:00
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-17 06:13:15 +08:00
|
|
|
SmallVector<std::pair<BasicBlock *, ConditionsTy>, 2> PredsCS;
|
|
|
|
for (auto *Pred : make_range(Preds.rbegin(), Preds.rend())) {
|
|
|
|
ConditionsTy Conditions;
|
|
|
|
recordConditions(CS, Pred, Conditions);
|
|
|
|
PredsCS.push_back({Pred, Conditions});
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-12-13 11:05:20 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-01-17 06:13:15 +08:00
|
|
|
if (std::all_of(PredsCS.begin(), PredsCS.end(),
|
|
|
|
[](const std::pair<BasicBlock *, ConditionsTy> &P) {
|
|
|
|
return P.second.empty();
|
|
|
|
}))
|
Recommit r317351 : Add CallSiteSplitting pass
This recommit r317351 after fixing a buildbot failure.
Original commit message:
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :
1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.
Split from :
if (!ptr || c)
callee(ptr);
to :
if (!ptr)
callee(null ptr) // set the known constant value
else if (c)
callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2-split1
BB2-split0:
call void @bar(i32 0)
br label %BB2
BB2-split1:
call void @bar(i32 1)
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]
llvm-svn: 317362
2017-11-04 04:41:16 +08:00
|
|
|
return false;
|
2017-11-19 02:14:13 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-22 23:23:33 +08:00
|
|
|
splitCallSite(CS, PredsCS, DT);
|
Recommit r317351 : Add CallSiteSplitting pass
This recommit r317351 after fixing a buildbot failure.
Original commit message:
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :
1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.
Split from :
if (!ptr || c)
callee(ptr);
to :
if (!ptr)
callee(null ptr) // set the known constant value
else if (c)
callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2-split1
BB2-split0:
call void @bar(i32 0)
br label %BB2
BB2-split1:
call void @bar(i32 1)
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]
llvm-svn: 317362
2017-11-04 04:41:16 +08:00
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-22 23:23:33 +08:00
|
|
|
static bool tryToSplitCallSite(CallSite CS, TargetTransformInfo &TTI,
|
|
|
|
DominatorTree *DT) {
|
2018-02-14 21:59:12 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!CS.arg_size() || !canSplitCallSite(CS, TTI))
|
2017-11-19 02:14:13 +08:00
|
|
|
return false;
|
2018-03-22 23:23:33 +08:00
|
|
|
return tryToSplitOnPredicatedArgument(CS, DT) ||
|
|
|
|
tryToSplitOnPHIPredicatedArgument(CS, DT);
|
2017-11-19 02:14:13 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-02-14 21:59:12 +08:00
|
|
|
static bool doCallSiteSplitting(Function &F, TargetLibraryInfo &TLI,
|
2018-03-22 23:23:33 +08:00
|
|
|
TargetTransformInfo &TTI, DominatorTree *DT) {
|
Recommit r317351 : Add CallSiteSplitting pass
This recommit r317351 after fixing a buildbot failure.
Original commit message:
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :
1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.
Split from :
if (!ptr || c)
callee(ptr);
to :
if (!ptr)
callee(null ptr) // set the known constant value
else if (c)
callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2-split1
BB2-split0:
call void @bar(i32 0)
br label %BB2
BB2-split1:
call void @bar(i32 1)
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]
llvm-svn: 317362
2017-11-04 04:41:16 +08:00
|
|
|
bool Changed = false;
|
|
|
|
for (Function::iterator BI = F.begin(), BE = F.end(); BI != BE;) {
|
|
|
|
BasicBlock &BB = *BI++;
|
2018-03-06 22:00:58 +08:00
|
|
|
auto II = BB.getFirstNonPHIOrDbg()->getIterator();
|
|
|
|
auto IE = BB.getTerminator()->getIterator();
|
|
|
|
// Iterate until we reach the terminator instruction. tryToSplitCallSite
|
|
|
|
// can replace BB's terminator in case BB is a successor of itself. In that
|
|
|
|
// case, IE will be invalidated and we also have to check the current
|
|
|
|
// terminator.
|
|
|
|
while (II != IE && &*II != BB.getTerminator()) {
|
Recommit r317351 : Add CallSiteSplitting pass
This recommit r317351 after fixing a buildbot failure.
Original commit message:
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :
1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.
Split from :
if (!ptr || c)
callee(ptr);
to :
if (!ptr)
callee(null ptr) // set the known constant value
else if (c)
callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2-split1
BB2-split0:
call void @bar(i32 0)
br label %BB2
BB2-split1:
call void @bar(i32 1)
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]
llvm-svn: 317362
2017-11-04 04:41:16 +08:00
|
|
|
Instruction *I = &*II++;
|
|
|
|
CallSite CS(cast<Value>(I));
|
|
|
|
if (!CS || isa<IntrinsicInst>(I) || isInstructionTriviallyDead(I, &TLI))
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Function *Callee = CS.getCalledFunction();
|
|
|
|
if (!Callee || Callee->isDeclaration())
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
2018-03-04 05:40:14 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Successful musttail call-site splits result in erased CI and erased BB.
|
|
|
|
// Check if such path is possible before attempting the splitting.
|
|
|
|
bool IsMustTail = CS.isMustTailCall();
|
|
|
|
|
2018-03-22 23:23:33 +08:00
|
|
|
Changed |= tryToSplitCallSite(CS, TTI, DT);
|
2018-03-04 05:40:14 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// There're no interesting instructions after this. The call site
|
|
|
|
// itself might have been erased on splitting.
|
|
|
|
if (IsMustTail)
|
|
|
|
break;
|
Recommit r317351 : Add CallSiteSplitting pass
This recommit r317351 after fixing a buildbot failure.
Original commit message:
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :
1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.
Split from :
if (!ptr || c)
callee(ptr);
to :
if (!ptr)
callee(null ptr) // set the known constant value
else if (c)
callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2-split1
BB2-split0:
call void @bar(i32 0)
br label %BB2
BB2-split1:
call void @bar(i32 1)
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]
llvm-svn: 317362
2017-11-04 04:41:16 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return Changed;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
namespace {
|
|
|
|
struct CallSiteSplittingLegacyPass : public FunctionPass {
|
|
|
|
static char ID;
|
|
|
|
CallSiteSplittingLegacyPass() : FunctionPass(ID) {
|
|
|
|
initializeCallSiteSplittingLegacyPassPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const override {
|
|
|
|
AU.addRequired<TargetLibraryInfoWrapperPass>();
|
2018-02-14 21:59:12 +08:00
|
|
|
AU.addRequired<TargetTransformInfoWrapperPass>();
|
2018-03-22 23:23:33 +08:00
|
|
|
AU.addPreserved<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>();
|
Recommit r317351 : Add CallSiteSplitting pass
This recommit r317351 after fixing a buildbot failure.
Original commit message:
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :
1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.
Split from :
if (!ptr || c)
callee(ptr);
to :
if (!ptr)
callee(null ptr) // set the known constant value
else if (c)
callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2-split1
BB2-split0:
call void @bar(i32 0)
br label %BB2
BB2-split1:
call void @bar(i32 1)
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]
llvm-svn: 317362
2017-11-04 04:41:16 +08:00
|
|
|
FunctionPass::getAnalysisUsage(AU);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bool runOnFunction(Function &F) override {
|
|
|
|
if (skipFunction(F))
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
auto &TLI = getAnalysis<TargetLibraryInfoWrapperPass>().getTLI();
|
2018-02-14 21:59:12 +08:00
|
|
|
auto &TTI = getAnalysis<TargetTransformInfoWrapperPass>().getTTI(F);
|
2018-03-22 23:23:33 +08:00
|
|
|
auto *DTWP = getAnalysisIfAvailable<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>();
|
|
|
|
return doCallSiteSplitting(F, TLI, TTI,
|
|
|
|
DTWP ? &DTWP->getDomTree() : nullptr);
|
Recommit r317351 : Add CallSiteSplitting pass
This recommit r317351 after fixing a buildbot failure.
Original commit message:
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :
1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.
Split from :
if (!ptr || c)
callee(ptr);
to :
if (!ptr)
callee(null ptr) // set the known constant value
else if (c)
callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2-split1
BB2-split0:
call void @bar(i32 0)
br label %BB2
BB2-split1:
call void @bar(i32 1)
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]
llvm-svn: 317362
2017-11-04 04:41:16 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
} // namespace
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
char CallSiteSplittingLegacyPass::ID = 0;
|
|
|
|
INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(CallSiteSplittingLegacyPass, "callsite-splitting",
|
|
|
|
"Call-site splitting", false, false)
|
|
|
|
INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(TargetLibraryInfoWrapperPass)
|
2018-02-14 21:59:12 +08:00
|
|
|
INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(TargetTransformInfoWrapperPass)
|
Recommit r317351 : Add CallSiteSplitting pass
This recommit r317351 after fixing a buildbot failure.
Original commit message:
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :
1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.
Split from :
if (!ptr || c)
callee(ptr);
to :
if (!ptr)
callee(null ptr) // set the known constant value
else if (c)
callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2-split1
BB2-split0:
call void @bar(i32 0)
br label %BB2
BB2-split1:
call void @bar(i32 1)
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]
llvm-svn: 317362
2017-11-04 04:41:16 +08:00
|
|
|
INITIALIZE_PASS_END(CallSiteSplittingLegacyPass, "callsite-splitting",
|
|
|
|
"Call-site splitting", false, false)
|
|
|
|
FunctionPass *llvm::createCallSiteSplittingPass() {
|
|
|
|
return new CallSiteSplittingLegacyPass();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PreservedAnalyses CallSiteSplittingPass::run(Function &F,
|
|
|
|
FunctionAnalysisManager &AM) {
|
|
|
|
auto &TLI = AM.getResult<TargetLibraryAnalysis>(F);
|
2018-02-14 21:59:12 +08:00
|
|
|
auto &TTI = AM.getResult<TargetIRAnalysis>(F);
|
2018-03-22 23:23:33 +08:00
|
|
|
auto *DT = AM.getCachedResult<DominatorTreeAnalysis>(F);
|
Recommit r317351 : Add CallSiteSplitting pass
This recommit r317351 after fixing a buildbot failure.
Original commit message:
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :
1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.
Split from :
if (!ptr || c)
callee(ptr);
to :
if (!ptr)
callee(null ptr) // set the known constant value
else if (c)
callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2-split1
BB2-split0:
call void @bar(i32 0)
br label %BB2
BB2-split1:
call void @bar(i32 1)
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]
llvm-svn: 317362
2017-11-04 04:41:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2018-03-22 23:23:33 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!doCallSiteSplitting(F, TLI, TTI, DT))
|
Recommit r317351 : Add CallSiteSplitting pass
This recommit r317351 after fixing a buildbot failure.
Original commit message:
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :
1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.
Split from :
if (!ptr || c)
callee(ptr);
to :
if (!ptr)
callee(null ptr) // set the known constant value
else if (c)
callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2-split1
BB2-split0:
call void @bar(i32 0)
br label %BB2
BB2-split1:
call void @bar(i32 1)
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]
llvm-svn: 317362
2017-11-04 04:41:16 +08:00
|
|
|
return PreservedAnalyses::all();
|
|
|
|
PreservedAnalyses PA;
|
2018-03-22 23:23:33 +08:00
|
|
|
PA.preserve<DominatorTreeAnalysis>();
|
Recommit r317351 : Add CallSiteSplitting pass
This recommit r317351 after fixing a buildbot failure.
Original commit message:
Summary:
This change add a pass which tries to split a call-site to pass
more constrained arguments if its argument is predicated in the control flow
so that we can expose better context to the later passes (e.g, inliner, jump
threading, or IPA-CP based function cloning, etc.).
As of now we support two cases :
1) If a call site is dominated by an OR condition and if any of its arguments
are predicated on this OR condition, try to split the condition with more
constrained arguments. For example, in the code below, we try to split the
call site since we can predicate the argument (ptr) based on the OR condition.
Split from :
if (!ptr || c)
callee(ptr);
to :
if (!ptr)
callee(null ptr) // set the known constant value
else if (c)
callee(nonnull ptr) // set non-null attribute in the argument
2) We can also split a call-site based on constant incoming values of a PHI
For example,
from :
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB0 ], [ 1, %BB1 ]
call void @bar(i32 %p)
to
BB0:
%c = icmp eq i32 %i1, %i2
br i1 %c, label %BB2-split0, label %BB1
BB1:
br label %BB2-split1
BB2-split0:
call void @bar(i32 0)
br label %BB2
BB2-split1:
call void @bar(i32 1)
br label %BB2
BB2:
%p = phi i32 [ 0, %BB2-split0 ], [ 1, %BB2-split1 ]
llvm-svn: 317362
2017-11-04 04:41:16 +08:00
|
|
|
return PA;
|
|
|
|
}
|