llvm-project/clang/test/SemaTemplate/instantiate-member-initiali...

44 lines
882 B
C++
Raw Normal View History

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -Wall -verify %s
template<typename T> struct A {
Rework base and member initialization in constructors, with several (necessarily simultaneous) changes: - CXXBaseOrMemberInitializer now contains only a single initializer rather than a set of initialiation arguments + a constructor. The single initializer covers all aspects of initialization, including constructor calls as necessary but also cleanup of temporaries created by the initializer (which we never handled before!). - Rework + simplify code generation for CXXBaseOrMemberInitializers, since we can now just emit the initializer as an initializer. - Switched base and member initialization over to the new initialization code (InitializationSequence), so that it - Improved diagnostics for the new initialization code when initializing bases and members, to match the diagnostics produced by the previous (special-purpose) code. - Simplify the representation of type-checked constructor initializers in templates; instead of keeping the fully-type-checked AST, which is rather hard to undo at template instantiation time, throw away the type-checked AST and store the raw expressions in the AST. This simplifies instantiation, but loses a little but of information in the AST. - When type-checking implicit base or member initializers within a dependent context, don't add the generated initializers into the AST, because they'll look like they were explicit. - Record in CXXConstructExpr when the constructor call is to initialize a base class, so that CodeGen does not have to infer it from context. This ensures that we call the right kind of constructor. There are also a few "opportunity" fixes here that were needed to not regress, for example: - Diagnose default-initialization of a const-qualified class that does not have a user-declared default constructor. We had this diagnostic specifically for bases and members, but missed it for variables. That's fixed now. - When defining the implicit constructors, destructor, and copy-assignment operator, set the CurContext to that constructor when we're defining the body. llvm-svn: 94952
2010-01-31 17:12:51 +08:00
A() : a(1) { } // expected-error{{cannot initialize a member subobject of type 'void *' with an rvalue of type 'int'}}
T a;
};
A<int> a0;
A<void*> a1; // expected-note{{in instantiation of member function 'A<void *>::A' requested here}}
template<typename T> struct B {
B() : b(1), // expected-warning {{field 'b' will be initialized after field 'a'}}
a(2) { }
int a;
int b;
};
B<int> b0; // expected-note {{in instantiation of member function 'B<int>::B' requested here}}
template <class T> struct AA { AA(int); };
template <class T> class BB : public AA<T> {
public:
BB() : AA<T>(1) {}
};
BB<int> x;
struct X {
X();
};
template<typename T>
struct Y {
Y() : x() {}
X x;
};
Y<int> y;
template<typename T> struct Array {
int a[3];
Array() : a() {}
};
Array<int> s;