maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/clang/test/CodeGen/catch-alignment-assumption-...

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

37 lines
3.6 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

[clang][UBSan] Sanitization for alignment assumptions. Summary: UB isn't nice. It's cool and powerful, but not nice. Having a way to detect it is nice though. [[ https://wg21.link/p1007r3 | P1007R3: std::assume_aligned ]] / http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1007r2.pdf says: ``` We propose to add this functionality via a library function instead of a core language attribute. ... If the pointer passed in is not aligned to at least N bytes, calling assume_aligned results in undefined behaviour. ``` This differential teaches clang to sanitize all the various variants of this assume-aligned attribute. Requires D54588 for LLVM IRBuilder changes. The compiler-rt part is D54590. This is a second commit, the original one was r351105, which was mass-reverted in r351159 because 2 compiler-rt tests were failing. Reviewers: ABataev, craig.topper, vsk, rsmith, rnk, #sanitizers, erichkeane, filcab, rjmccall Reviewed By: rjmccall Subscribers: chandlerc, ldionne, EricWF, mclow.lists, cfe-commits, bkramer Tags: #sanitizers Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54589 llvm-svn: 351177
2019-01-15 17:44:25 +08:00
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s -o - -triple x86_64-linux-gnu | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,CHECK-NOSANITIZE
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsanitize=alignment -fno-sanitize-recover=alignment -emit-llvm %s -o - -triple x86_64-linux-gnu | FileCheck %s -implicit-check-not="call void @__ubsan_handle_alignment_assumption" --check-prefixes=CHECK,CHECK-SANITIZE,CHECK-SANITIZE-ANYRECOVER,CHECK-SANITIZE-NORECOVER,CHECK-SANITIZE-UNREACHABLE
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsanitize=alignment -fsanitize-recover=alignment -emit-llvm %s -o - -triple x86_64-linux-gnu | FileCheck %s -implicit-check-not="call void @__ubsan_handle_alignment_assumption" --check-prefixes=CHECK,CHECK-SANITIZE,CHECK-SANITIZE-ANYRECOVER,CHECK-SANITIZE-RECOVER
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsanitize=alignment -fsanitize-trap=alignment -emit-llvm %s -o - -triple x86_64-linux-gnu | FileCheck %s -implicit-check-not="call void @__ubsan_handle_alignment_assumption" --check-prefixes=CHECK,CHECK-SANITIZE,CHECK-SANITIZE-TRAP,CHECK-SANITIZE-UNREACHABLE
// CHECK-SANITIZE-ANYRECOVER: @[[CHAR:.*]] = {{.*}} c"'char **'\00" }
// CHECK-SANITIZE-ANYRECOVER: @[[LINE_100_ALIGNMENT_ASSUMPTION:.*]] = {{.*}}, i32 100, i32 35 }, {{.*}}* @[[CHAR]] }
void *caller(char **x, unsigned long offset) {
Revert "[CodeGenModule] Assume dso_local for -fpic -fno-semantic-interposition" This reverts commit 789a46f2d742e11edaade28cb59a0f4d2a1d770e. Accidentally committed.
2020-02-04 02:09:39 +08:00
// CHECK: define i8* @{{.*}}(i8** %[[X:.*]], i64 %[[OFFSET:.*]])
[clang][UBSan] Sanitization for alignment assumptions. Summary: UB isn't nice. It's cool and powerful, but not nice. Having a way to detect it is nice though. [[ https://wg21.link/p1007r3 | P1007R3: std::assume_aligned ]] / http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1007r2.pdf says: ``` We propose to add this functionality via a library function instead of a core language attribute. ... If the pointer passed in is not aligned to at least N bytes, calling assume_aligned results in undefined behaviour. ``` This differential teaches clang to sanitize all the various variants of this assume-aligned attribute. Requires D54588 for LLVM IRBuilder changes. The compiler-rt part is D54590. This is a second commit, the original one was r351105, which was mass-reverted in r351159 because 2 compiler-rt tests were failing. Reviewers: ABataev, craig.topper, vsk, rsmith, rnk, #sanitizers, erichkeane, filcab, rjmccall Reviewed By: rjmccall Subscribers: chandlerc, ldionne, EricWF, mclow.lists, cfe-commits, bkramer Tags: #sanitizers Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54589 llvm-svn: 351177
2019-01-15 17:44:25 +08:00
// CHECK-NEXT: entry:
// CHECK-NEXT: %[[X_ADDR:.*]] = alloca i8**, align 8
// CHECK-NEXT: %[[OFFSET_ADDR:.*]] = alloca i64, align 8
// CHECK-NEXT: store i8** %[[X]], i8*** %[[X_ADDR]], align 8
// CHECK-NEXT: store i64 %[[OFFSET]], i64* %[[OFFSET_ADDR]], align 8
// CHECK-NEXT: %[[X_RELOADED:.*]] = load i8**, i8*** %[[X_ADDR]], align 8
// CHECK-NEXT: %[[BITCAST:.*]] = bitcast i8** %[[X_RELOADED]] to i8*
// CHECK-NEXT: %[[OFFSET_RELOADED:.*]] = load i64, i64* %[[OFFSET_ADDR]], align 8
// CHECK-NEXT: %[[PTRINT:.*]] = ptrtoint i8* %[[BITCAST]] to i64
// CHECK-NEXT: %[[OFFSETPTR:.*]] = sub i64 %[[PTRINT]], %[[OFFSET_RELOADED]]
Reland r374450 with Richard Smith's comments and test fixed. The behavior from the original patch has changed, since we're no longer allowing LLVM to just ignore the alignment. Instead, we're just assuming the maximum possible alignment. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68824 llvm-svn: 374562
2019-10-11 22:59:44 +08:00
// CHECK-NEXT: %[[MASKEDPTR:.*]] = and i64 %[[OFFSETPTR]], 536870911
[clang][UBSan] Sanitization for alignment assumptions. Summary: UB isn't nice. It's cool and powerful, but not nice. Having a way to detect it is nice though. [[ https://wg21.link/p1007r3 | P1007R3: std::assume_aligned ]] / http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1007r2.pdf says: ``` We propose to add this functionality via a library function instead of a core language attribute. ... If the pointer passed in is not aligned to at least N bytes, calling assume_aligned results in undefined behaviour. ``` This differential teaches clang to sanitize all the various variants of this assume-aligned attribute. Requires D54588 for LLVM IRBuilder changes. The compiler-rt part is D54590. This is a second commit, the original one was r351105, which was mass-reverted in r351159 because 2 compiler-rt tests were failing. Reviewers: ABataev, craig.topper, vsk, rsmith, rnk, #sanitizers, erichkeane, filcab, rjmccall Reviewed By: rjmccall Subscribers: chandlerc, ldionne, EricWF, mclow.lists, cfe-commits, bkramer Tags: #sanitizers Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54589 llvm-svn: 351177
2019-01-15 17:44:25 +08:00
// CHECK-NEXT: %[[MASKCOND:.*]] = icmp eq i64 %[[MASKEDPTR]], 0
// CHECK-SANITIZE-NEXT: %[[PTRINT_DUP:.*]] = ptrtoint i8* %[[BITCAST]] to i64, !nosanitize
// CHECK-SANITIZE-NEXT: br i1 %[[MASKCOND]], label %[[CONT:.*]], label %[[HANDLER_ALIGNMENT_ASSUMPTION:[^,]+]],{{.*}} !nosanitize
// CHECK-SANITIZE: [[HANDLER_ALIGNMENT_ASSUMPTION]]:
Reland r374450 with Richard Smith's comments and test fixed. The behavior from the original patch has changed, since we're no longer allowing LLVM to just ignore the alignment. Instead, we're just assuming the maximum possible alignment. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68824 llvm-svn: 374562
2019-10-11 22:59:44 +08:00
// CHECK-SANITIZE-NORECOVER-NEXT: call void @__ubsan_handle_alignment_assumption_abort(i8* bitcast ({ {{{.*}}}, {{{.*}}}, {{{.*}}}* }* @[[LINE_100_ALIGNMENT_ASSUMPTION]] to i8*), i64 %[[PTRINT_DUP]], i64 536870912, i64 %[[OFFSET_RELOADED]]){{.*}}, !nosanitize
// CHECK-SANITIZE-RECOVER-NEXT: call void @__ubsan_handle_alignment_assumption(i8* bitcast ({ {{{.*}}}, {{{.*}}}, {{{.*}}}* }* @[[LINE_100_ALIGNMENT_ASSUMPTION]] to i8*), i64 %[[PTRINT_DUP]], i64 536870912, i64 %[[OFFSET_RELOADED]]){{.*}}, !nosanitize
[clang][UBSan] Sanitization for alignment assumptions. Summary: UB isn't nice. It's cool and powerful, but not nice. Having a way to detect it is nice though. [[ https://wg21.link/p1007r3 | P1007R3: std::assume_aligned ]] / http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1007r2.pdf says: ``` We propose to add this functionality via a library function instead of a core language attribute. ... If the pointer passed in is not aligned to at least N bytes, calling assume_aligned results in undefined behaviour. ``` This differential teaches clang to sanitize all the various variants of this assume-aligned attribute. Requires D54588 for LLVM IRBuilder changes. The compiler-rt part is D54590. This is a second commit, the original one was r351105, which was mass-reverted in r351159 because 2 compiler-rt tests were failing. Reviewers: ABataev, craig.topper, vsk, rsmith, rnk, #sanitizers, erichkeane, filcab, rjmccall Reviewed By: rjmccall Subscribers: chandlerc, ldionne, EricWF, mclow.lists, cfe-commits, bkramer Tags: #sanitizers Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54589 llvm-svn: 351177
2019-01-15 17:44:25 +08:00
// CHECK-SANITIZE-TRAP-NEXT: call void @llvm.trap(){{.*}}, !nosanitize
// CHECK-SANITIZE-UNREACHABLE-NEXT: unreachable, !nosanitize
// CHECK-SANITIZE: [[CONT]]:
// CHECK-NEXT: call void @llvm.assume(i1 %[[MASKCOND]])
// CHECK-NEXT: ret i8* %[[BITCAST]]
// CHECK-NEXT: }
#line 100
return __builtin_assume_aligned(x, 0x80000000, offset);
}