llvm-project/flang/lib/Parser/parse-tree.cpp

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

250 lines
8.8 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

//===-- lib/Parser/parse-tree.cpp -----------------------------------------===//
//
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "flang/Parser/parse-tree.h"
#include "flang/Common/idioms.h"
#include "flang/Common/indirection.h"
#include "flang/Parser/tools.h"
#include "flang/Parser/user-state.h"
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
#include <algorithm>
namespace Fortran::parser {
// R867
ImportStmt::ImportStmt(common::ImportKind &&k, std::list<Name> &&n)
: kind{k}, names(std::move(n)) {
CHECK(kind == common::ImportKind::Default ||
kind == common::ImportKind::Only || names.empty());
}
// R873
CommonStmt::CommonStmt(std::optional<Name> &&name,
std::list<CommonBlockObject> &&objects, std::list<Block> &&others) {
blocks.emplace_front(std::move(name), std::move(objects));
blocks.splice(blocks.end(), std::move(others));
}
// R901 designator
bool Designator::EndsInBareName() const {
return std::visit(
common::visitors{
[](const DataRef &dr) {
return std::holds_alternative<Name>(dr.u) ||
std::holds_alternative<common::Indirection<StructureComponent>>(
dr.u);
},
[](const Substring &) { return false; },
},
u);
}
// R911 data-ref -> part-ref [% part-ref]...
DataRef::DataRef(std::list<PartRef> &&prl) : u{std::move(prl.front().name)} {
for (bool first{true}; !prl.empty(); first = false, prl.pop_front()) {
PartRef &pr{prl.front()};
if (!first) {
u = common::Indirection<StructureComponent>::Make(
std::move(*this), std::move(pr.name));
}
if (!pr.subscripts.empty()) {
u = common::Indirection<ArrayElement>::Make(
std::move(*this), std::move(pr.subscripts));
}
if (pr.imageSelector) {
u = common::Indirection<CoindexedNamedObject>::Make(
std::move(*this), std::move(*pr.imageSelector));
}
}
}
// R1001 - R1022 expression
Expr::Expr(Designator &&x)
: u{common::Indirection<Designator>::Make(std::move(x))} {}
Expr::Expr(FunctionReference &&x)
: u{common::Indirection<FunctionReference>::Make(std::move(x))} {}
[flang] These changes are for issue 458, to perform semantic checks on DO variable and initial, final, and step expressions. As a new extension, we want to allow REAL and DOUBLE PRECISION values for them by default. Here's a summary of the changes: - There already existed infrastructure for semantic checking of DO loops that was partially specific to DO CONCURRENT loops. Because I re-used some of this infrastructure, I renamed some files and classes from "concurrent" to "stmt". - I added some functions to distinguish among the different kinds of DO statements. - I added the functions to check-do-stmt.cc to produce the necessary warnins and errors. Note that there are no tests for the warnings since the necessary testing infrastructure does not yet exist. - I changed test-errors.sh so that additional compilation options can be specified in the test source. - I added two new tests to test for the various kinds of values that can be used for the DO variables and control expressions. The two tests are identical except for the use of different compilation options. dosemantics03.f90 specifies the options "-Mstandard -Werror" to produce error messages for the use of REAL and DOUBLE PRECISION DO variables and controls. dosemantics04.f90 uses the default options and only produces error messages for contructs that are erroneous by default. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@f484660c75941b5af93bd8bc7aabe73ab958769c Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/478 Tree-same-pre-rewrite: false
2019-06-05 06:14:34 +08:00
const std::optional<LoopControl> &DoConstruct::GetLoopControl() const {
const NonLabelDoStmt &doStmt{
[flang] These changes are for issue 458, to perform semantic checks on DO variable and initial, final, and step expressions. As a new extension, we want to allow REAL and DOUBLE PRECISION values for them by default. Here's a summary of the changes: - There already existed infrastructure for semantic checking of DO loops that was partially specific to DO CONCURRENT loops. Because I re-used some of this infrastructure, I renamed some files and classes from "concurrent" to "stmt". - I added some functions to distinguish among the different kinds of DO statements. - I added the functions to check-do-stmt.cc to produce the necessary warnins and errors. Note that there are no tests for the warnings since the necessary testing infrastructure does not yet exist. - I changed test-errors.sh so that additional compilation options can be specified in the test source. - I added two new tests to test for the various kinds of values that can be used for the DO variables and control expressions. The two tests are identical except for the use of different compilation options. dosemantics03.f90 specifies the options "-Mstandard -Werror" to produce error messages for the use of REAL and DOUBLE PRECISION DO variables and controls. dosemantics04.f90 uses the default options and only produces error messages for contructs that are erroneous by default. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@f484660c75941b5af93bd8bc7aabe73ab958769c Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/478 Tree-same-pre-rewrite: false
2019-06-05 06:14:34 +08:00
std::get<Statement<NonLabelDoStmt>>(t).statement};
const std::optional<LoopControl> &control{
[flang] These changes are for issue 458, to perform semantic checks on DO variable and initial, final, and step expressions. As a new extension, we want to allow REAL and DOUBLE PRECISION values for them by default. Here's a summary of the changes: - There already existed infrastructure for semantic checking of DO loops that was partially specific to DO CONCURRENT loops. Because I re-used some of this infrastructure, I renamed some files and classes from "concurrent" to "stmt". - I added some functions to distinguish among the different kinds of DO statements. - I added the functions to check-do-stmt.cc to produce the necessary warnins and errors. Note that there are no tests for the warnings since the necessary testing infrastructure does not yet exist. - I changed test-errors.sh so that additional compilation options can be specified in the test source. - I added two new tests to test for the various kinds of values that can be used for the DO variables and control expressions. The two tests are identical except for the use of different compilation options. dosemantics03.f90 specifies the options "-Mstandard -Werror" to produce error messages for the use of REAL and DOUBLE PRECISION DO variables and controls. dosemantics04.f90 uses the default options and only produces error messages for contructs that are erroneous by default. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@f484660c75941b5af93bd8bc7aabe73ab958769c Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/478 Tree-same-pre-rewrite: false
2019-06-05 06:14:34 +08:00
std::get<std::optional<LoopControl>>(doStmt.t)};
return control;
}
bool DoConstruct::IsDoNormal() const {
const std::optional<LoopControl> &control{GetLoopControl()};
[flang] These changes are for issue 458, to perform semantic checks on DO variable and initial, final, and step expressions. As a new extension, we want to allow REAL and DOUBLE PRECISION values for them by default. Here's a summary of the changes: - There already existed infrastructure for semantic checking of DO loops that was partially specific to DO CONCURRENT loops. Because I re-used some of this infrastructure, I renamed some files and classes from "concurrent" to "stmt". - I added some functions to distinguish among the different kinds of DO statements. - I added the functions to check-do-stmt.cc to produce the necessary warnins and errors. Note that there are no tests for the warnings since the necessary testing infrastructure does not yet exist. - I changed test-errors.sh so that additional compilation options can be specified in the test source. - I added two new tests to test for the various kinds of values that can be used for the DO variables and control expressions. The two tests are identical except for the use of different compilation options. dosemantics03.f90 specifies the options "-Mstandard -Werror" to produce error messages for the use of REAL and DOUBLE PRECISION DO variables and controls. dosemantics04.f90 uses the default options and only produces error messages for contructs that are erroneous by default. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@f484660c75941b5af93bd8bc7aabe73ab958769c Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/478 Tree-same-pre-rewrite: false
2019-06-05 06:14:34 +08:00
return control && std::holds_alternative<LoopControl::Bounds>(control->u);
}
bool DoConstruct::IsDoWhile() const {
const std::optional<LoopControl> &control{GetLoopControl()};
[flang] These changes are for issue 458, to perform semantic checks on DO variable and initial, final, and step expressions. As a new extension, we want to allow REAL and DOUBLE PRECISION values for them by default. Here's a summary of the changes: - There already existed infrastructure for semantic checking of DO loops that was partially specific to DO CONCURRENT loops. Because I re-used some of this infrastructure, I renamed some files and classes from "concurrent" to "stmt". - I added some functions to distinguish among the different kinds of DO statements. - I added the functions to check-do-stmt.cc to produce the necessary warnins and errors. Note that there are no tests for the warnings since the necessary testing infrastructure does not yet exist. - I changed test-errors.sh so that additional compilation options can be specified in the test source. - I added two new tests to test for the various kinds of values that can be used for the DO variables and control expressions. The two tests are identical except for the use of different compilation options. dosemantics03.f90 specifies the options "-Mstandard -Werror" to produce error messages for the use of REAL and DOUBLE PRECISION DO variables and controls. dosemantics04.f90 uses the default options and only produces error messages for contructs that are erroneous by default. Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@f484660c75941b5af93bd8bc7aabe73ab958769c Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/478 Tree-same-pre-rewrite: false
2019-06-05 06:14:34 +08:00
return control && std::holds_alternative<ScalarLogicalExpr>(control->u);
}
[flang] More name resolution for construct entities Push a new scope for constructs and statements that require one (DataStmt, DO CONCURRENT, ForallConstruct, ForallStmt -- there are more to do). Currently we use the Block kind of scope because there is no difference. Perhaps that kind should be renamed to Construct, though it does apply to statements as well as constructs. Add DeclareConstructEntity to create a construct or statement entity. When the type is not specified it can come from the type of a symbol in the enclosing scope with the same name. Change DeclareObjectEntity et al. to return the symbol declared, for the benefit of DeclareConstructEntity. Use DeclareConstructEntity for DO CONCURRENT index-name, LOCAL, and LOCAL_INIT variables and the data-i-do-variable in DataImpliedDo Names in SHARED locality spec need special handling: create a new kinds of symbol with HostAssocDetails to represent the host-association of the shared variables within the construct scope. That symbol gets the LocalityShared flag without affecting the symbol in the outer scope. HostAssoc symbols may be useful in other contexts, e.g. up-level references to local variables. Add parser::DoConstruct::IsDoConcurrent() because DO CONCURRENT loops introduce a construct scope while other DO loops do not. Move CanonicalizeDo to before name resolution so that name resolution doesn't have to deal with labeled DO CONCURRENT loops. Allow for type of index name to be specified in ConcurrentHeader. Resolve the derived type name in an AllocateStmt, StructureConstructor Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@bc7b9891367f3174c9b5018ce5636a36a5a76c1c Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/214
2018-10-18 22:55:48 +08:00
bool DoConstruct::IsDoConcurrent() const {
const std::optional<LoopControl> &control{GetLoopControl()};
[flang] More name resolution for construct entities Push a new scope for constructs and statements that require one (DataStmt, DO CONCURRENT, ForallConstruct, ForallStmt -- there are more to do). Currently we use the Block kind of scope because there is no difference. Perhaps that kind should be renamed to Construct, though it does apply to statements as well as constructs. Add DeclareConstructEntity to create a construct or statement entity. When the type is not specified it can come from the type of a symbol in the enclosing scope with the same name. Change DeclareObjectEntity et al. to return the symbol declared, for the benefit of DeclareConstructEntity. Use DeclareConstructEntity for DO CONCURRENT index-name, LOCAL, and LOCAL_INIT variables and the data-i-do-variable in DataImpliedDo Names in SHARED locality spec need special handling: create a new kinds of symbol with HostAssocDetails to represent the host-association of the shared variables within the construct scope. That symbol gets the LocalityShared flag without affecting the symbol in the outer scope. HostAssoc symbols may be useful in other contexts, e.g. up-level references to local variables. Add parser::DoConstruct::IsDoConcurrent() because DO CONCURRENT loops introduce a construct scope while other DO loops do not. Move CanonicalizeDo to before name resolution so that name resolution doesn't have to deal with labeled DO CONCURRENT loops. Allow for type of index name to be specified in ConcurrentHeader. Resolve the derived type name in an AllocateStmt, StructureConstructor Original-commit: flang-compiler/f18@bc7b9891367f3174c9b5018ce5636a36a5a76c1c Reviewed-on: https://github.com/flang-compiler/f18/pull/214
2018-10-18 22:55:48 +08:00
return control && std::holds_alternative<LoopControl::Concurrent>(control->u);
}
static Designator MakeArrayElementRef(
const Name &name, std::list<Expr> &&subscripts) {
ArrayElement arrayElement{DataRef{Name{name}}, std::list<SectionSubscript>{}};
for (Expr &expr : subscripts) {
arrayElement.subscripts.push_back(
SectionSubscript{Integer{common::Indirection{std::move(expr)}}});
}
return Designator{DataRef{common::Indirection{std::move(arrayElement)}}};
}
static Designator MakeArrayElementRef(
StructureComponent &&sc, std::list<Expr> &&subscripts) {
ArrayElement arrayElement{DataRef{common::Indirection{std::move(sc)}},
std::list<SectionSubscript>{}};
for (Expr &expr : subscripts) {
arrayElement.subscripts.push_back(
SectionSubscript{Integer{common::Indirection{std::move(expr)}}});
}
return Designator{DataRef{common::Indirection{std::move(arrayElement)}}};
}
// Set source in any type of node that has it.
template <typename T> T WithSource(CharBlock source, T &&x) {
x.source = source;
return std::move(x);
}
static Expr ActualArgToExpr(ActualArgSpec &arg) {
return std::visit(
common::visitors{
[&](common::Indirection<Expr> &y) { return std::move(y.value()); },
[&](common::Indirection<Variable> &y) {
return std::visit(
common::visitors{
[&](common::Indirection<Designator> &z) {
return WithSource(
z.value().source, Expr{std::move(z.value())});
},
[&](common::Indirection<FunctionReference> &z) {
return WithSource(
z.value().v.source, Expr{std::move(z.value())});
},
},
y.value().u);
},
[&](auto &) -> Expr { common::die("unexpected type"); },
},
std::get<ActualArg>(arg.t).u);
}
Designator FunctionReference::ConvertToArrayElementRef() {
std::list<Expr> args;
for (auto &arg : std::get<std::list<ActualArgSpec>>(v.t)) {
args.emplace_back(ActualArgToExpr(arg));
}
return std::visit(
common::visitors{
[&](const Name &name) {
return WithSource(
v.source, MakeArrayElementRef(name, std::move(args)));
},
[&](ProcComponentRef &pcr) {
return WithSource(v.source,
MakeArrayElementRef(std::move(pcr.v.thing), std::move(args)));
},
},
std::get<ProcedureDesignator>(v.t).u);
}
StructureConstructor FunctionReference::ConvertToStructureConstructor(
const semantics::DerivedTypeSpec &derived) {
Name name{std::get<parser::Name>(std::get<ProcedureDesignator>(v.t).u)};
std::list<ComponentSpec> components;
for (auto &arg : std::get<std::list<ActualArgSpec>>(v.t)) {
std::optional<Keyword> keyword;
if (auto &kw{std::get<std::optional<Keyword>>(arg.t)}) {
keyword.emplace(Keyword{Name{kw->v}});
}
components.emplace_back(
std::move(keyword), ComponentDataSource{ActualArgToExpr(arg)});
}
DerivedTypeSpec spec{std::move(name), std::list<TypeParamSpec>{}};
spec.derivedTypeSpec = &derived;
return StructureConstructor{std::move(spec), std::move(components)};
}
StructureConstructor ArrayElement::ConvertToStructureConstructor(
const semantics::DerivedTypeSpec &derived) {
Name name{std::get<parser::Name>(base.u)};
std::list<ComponentSpec> components;
for (auto &subscript : subscripts) {
components.emplace_back(std::optional<Keyword>{},
ComponentDataSource{std::move(*Unwrap<Expr>(subscript))});
}
DerivedTypeSpec spec{std::move(name), std::list<TypeParamSpec>{}};
spec.derivedTypeSpec = &derived;
return StructureConstructor{std::move(spec), std::move(components)};
}
Substring ArrayElement::ConvertToSubstring() {
auto iter{subscripts.begin()};
CHECK(iter != subscripts.end());
auto &triplet{std::get<SubscriptTriplet>(iter->u)};
CHECK(!std::get<2>(triplet.t));
CHECK(++iter == subscripts.end());
return Substring{std::move(base),
SubstringRange{std::get<0>(std::move(triplet.t)),
std::get<1>(std::move(triplet.t))}};
}
// R1544 stmt-function-stmt
// Convert this stmt-function-stmt to an array element assignment statement.
Statement<ActionStmt> StmtFunctionStmt::ConvertToAssignment() {
auto &funcName{std::get<Name>(t)};
auto &funcArgs{std::get<std::list<Name>>(t)};
auto &funcExpr{std::get<Scalar<Expr>>(t).thing};
CharBlock source{funcName.source};
std::list<Expr> subscripts;
for (Name &arg : funcArgs) {
subscripts.push_back(WithSource(arg.source,
Expr{common::Indirection{
WithSource(arg.source, Designator{DataRef{Name{arg}}})}}));
source.ExtendToCover(arg.source);
}
// extend source to include closing paren
if (funcArgs.empty()) {
CHECK(*source.end() == '(');
source = CharBlock{source.begin(), source.end() + 1};
}
CHECK(*source.end() == ')');
source = CharBlock{source.begin(), source.end() + 1};
auto variable{Variable{common::Indirection{WithSource(
source, MakeArrayElementRef(funcName, std::move(subscripts)))}}};
return Statement{std::nullopt,
ActionStmt{common::Indirection{
AssignmentStmt{std::move(variable), std::move(funcExpr)}}}};
}
CharBlock Variable::GetSource() const {
return std::visit(
common::visitors{
[&](const common::Indirection<Designator> &des) {
return des.value().source;
},
[&](const common::Indirection<parser::FunctionReference> &call) {
return call.value().v.source;
},
},
u);
}
llvm::raw_ostream &operator<<(llvm::raw_ostream &os, const Name &x) {
return os << x.ToString();
}
} // namespace Fortran::parser