llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/Utils/Local.cpp

1261 lines
48 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

//===-- Local.cpp - Functions to perform local transformations ------------===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// This family of functions perform various local transformations to the
// program.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/Local.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/DenseMap.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/MemoryBuiltins.h"
#include "llvm/Analysis/ValueTracking.h"
#include "llvm/IR/CFG.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Constants.h"
#include "llvm/IR/DIBuilder.h"
#include "llvm/IR/DataLayout.h"
#include "llvm/IR/DebugInfo.h"
#include "llvm/IR/DerivedTypes.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Dominators.h"
#include "llvm/IR/GetElementPtrTypeIterator.h"
#include "llvm/IR/GlobalAlias.h"
#include "llvm/IR/GlobalVariable.h"
#include "llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Instructions.h"
#include "llvm/IR/IntrinsicInst.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Intrinsics.h"
#include "llvm/IR/MDBuilder.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Metadata.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Operator.h"
#include "llvm/IR/ValueHandle.h"
#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
#include "llvm/Support/MathExtras.h"
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
2003-12-19 13:56:28 +08:00
using namespace llvm;
[Modules] Make Support/Debug.h modular. This requires it to not change behavior based on other files defining DEBUG_TYPE, which means it cannot define DEBUG_TYPE at all. This is actually better IMO as it forces folks to define relevant DEBUG_TYPEs for their files. However, it requires all files that currently use DEBUG(...) to define a DEBUG_TYPE if they don't already. I've updated all such files in LLVM and will do the same for other upstream projects. This still leaves one important change in how LLVM uses the DEBUG_TYPE macro going forward: we need to only define the macro *after* header files have been #include-ed. Previously, this wasn't possible because Debug.h required the macro to be pre-defined. This commit removes that. By defining DEBUG_TYPE after the includes two things are fixed: - Header files that need to provide a DEBUG_TYPE for some inline code can do so by defining the macro before their inline code and undef-ing it afterward so the macro does not escape. - We no longer have rampant ODR violations due to including headers with different DEBUG_TYPE definitions. This may be mostly an academic violation today, but with modules these types of violations are easy to check for and potentially very relevant. Where necessary to suppor headers with DEBUG_TYPE, I have moved the definitions below the includes in this commit. I plan to move the rest of the DEBUG_TYPE macros in LLVM in subsequent commits; this one is big enough. The comments in Debug.h, which were hilariously out of date already, have been updated to reflect the recommended practice going forward. llvm-svn: 206822
2014-04-22 06:55:11 +08:00
#define DEBUG_TYPE "local"
STATISTIC(NumRemoved, "Number of unreachable basic blocks removed");
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// Local constant propagation.
//
/// ConstantFoldTerminator - If a terminator instruction is predicated on a
/// constant value, convert it into an unconditional branch to the constant
/// destination. This is a nontrivial operation because the successors of this
/// basic block must have their PHI nodes updated.
/// Also calls RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions() on any branch/switch
/// conditions and indirectbr addresses this might make dead if
/// DeleteDeadConditions is true.
bool llvm::ConstantFoldTerminator(BasicBlock *BB, bool DeleteDeadConditions,
const TargetLibraryInfo *TLI) {
TerminatorInst *T = BB->getTerminator();
IRBuilder<> Builder(T);
// Branch - See if we are conditional jumping on constant
if (BranchInst *BI = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(T)) {
if (BI->isUnconditional()) return false; // Can't optimize uncond branch
2009-01-31 02:21:13 +08:00
BasicBlock *Dest1 = BI->getSuccessor(0);
BasicBlock *Dest2 = BI->getSuccessor(1);
if (ConstantInt *Cond = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(BI->getCondition())) {
// Are we branching on constant?
// YES. Change to unconditional branch...
BasicBlock *Destination = Cond->getZExtValue() ? Dest1 : Dest2;
BasicBlock *OldDest = Cond->getZExtValue() ? Dest2 : Dest1;
//cerr << "Function: " << T->getParent()->getParent()
// << "\nRemoving branch from " << T->getParent()
// << "\n\nTo: " << OldDest << endl;
// Let the basic block know that we are letting go of it. Based on this,
// it will adjust it's PHI nodes.
OldDest->removePredecessor(BB);
// Replace the conditional branch with an unconditional one.
Builder.CreateBr(Destination);
BI->eraseFromParent();
return true;
}
if (Dest2 == Dest1) { // Conditional branch to same location?
// This branch matches something like this:
// br bool %cond, label %Dest, label %Dest
// and changes it into: br label %Dest
// Let the basic block know that we are letting go of one copy of it.
assert(BI->getParent() && "Terminator not inserted in block!");
Dest1->removePredecessor(BI->getParent());
// Replace the conditional branch with an unconditional one.
Builder.CreateBr(Dest1);
Value *Cond = BI->getCondition();
BI->eraseFromParent();
if (DeleteDeadConditions)
RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions(Cond, TLI);
return true;
}
return false;
}
if (SwitchInst *SI = dyn_cast<SwitchInst>(T)) {
// If we are switching on a constant, we can convert the switch into a
// single branch instruction!
ConstantInt *CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(SI->getCondition());
BasicBlock *TheOnlyDest = SI->getDefaultDest();
BasicBlock *DefaultDest = TheOnlyDest;
// Figure out which case it goes to.
for (SwitchInst::CaseIt i = SI->case_begin(), e = SI->case_end();
i != e; ++i) {
// Found case matching a constant operand?
if (i.getCaseValue() == CI) {
TheOnlyDest = i.getCaseSuccessor();
break;
}
// Check to see if this branch is going to the same place as the default
// dest. If so, eliminate it as an explicit compare.
if (i.getCaseSuccessor() == DefaultDest) {
MDNode* MD = SI->getMetadata(LLVMContext::MD_prof);
unsigned NCases = SI->getNumCases();
// Fold the case metadata into the default if there will be any branches
// left, unless the metadata doesn't match the switch.
if (NCases > 1 && MD && MD->getNumOperands() == 2 + NCases) {
// Collect branch weights into a vector.
SmallVector<uint32_t, 8> Weights;
for (unsigned MD_i = 1, MD_e = MD->getNumOperands(); MD_i < MD_e;
++MD_i) {
ConstantInt* CI = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(MD->getOperand(MD_i));
assert(CI);
Weights.push_back(CI->getValue().getZExtValue());
}
// Merge weight of this case to the default weight.
unsigned idx = i.getCaseIndex();
Weights[0] += Weights[idx+1];
// Remove weight for this case.
std::swap(Weights[idx+1], Weights.back());
Weights.pop_back();
SI->setMetadata(LLVMContext::MD_prof,
MDBuilder(BB->getContext()).
createBranchWeights(Weights));
}
// Remove this entry.
DefaultDest->removePredecessor(SI->getParent());
SI->removeCase(i);
--i; --e;
continue;
}
// Otherwise, check to see if the switch only branches to one destination.
// We do this by reseting "TheOnlyDest" to null when we find two non-equal
// destinations.
if (i.getCaseSuccessor() != TheOnlyDest) TheOnlyDest = nullptr;
}
if (CI && !TheOnlyDest) {
// Branching on a constant, but not any of the cases, go to the default
// successor.
TheOnlyDest = SI->getDefaultDest();
}
// If we found a single destination that we can fold the switch into, do so
// now.
if (TheOnlyDest) {
// Insert the new branch.
Builder.CreateBr(TheOnlyDest);
BasicBlock *BB = SI->getParent();
// Remove entries from PHI nodes which we no longer branch to...
for (unsigned i = 0, e = SI->getNumSuccessors(); i != e; ++i) {
// Found case matching a constant operand?
BasicBlock *Succ = SI->getSuccessor(i);
if (Succ == TheOnlyDest)
TheOnlyDest = nullptr; // Don't modify the first branch to TheOnlyDest
else
Succ->removePredecessor(BB);
}
// Delete the old switch.
Value *Cond = SI->getCondition();
SI->eraseFromParent();
if (DeleteDeadConditions)
RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions(Cond, TLI);
return true;
}
SwitchInst refactoring. The purpose of refactoring is to hide operand roles from SwitchInst user (programmer). If you want to play with operands directly, probably you will need lower level methods than SwitchInst ones (TerminatorInst or may be User). After this patch we can reorganize SwitchInst operands and successors as we want. What was done: 1. Changed semantics of index inside the getCaseValue method: getCaseValue(0) means "get first case", not a condition. Use getCondition() if you want to resolve the condition. I propose don't mix SwitchInst case indexing with low level indexing (TI successors indexing, User's operands indexing), since it may be dangerous. 2. By the same reason findCaseValue(ConstantInt*) returns actual number of case value. 0 means first case, not default. If there is no case with given value, ErrorIndex will returned. 3. Added getCaseSuccessor method. I propose to avoid usage of TerminatorInst::getSuccessor if you want to resolve case successor BB. Use getCaseSuccessor instead, since internal SwitchInst organization of operands/successors is hidden and may be changed in any moment. 4. Added resolveSuccessorIndex and resolveCaseIndex. The main purpose of these methods is to see how case successors are really mapped in TerminatorInst. 4.1 "resolveSuccessorIndex" was created if you need to level down from SwitchInst to TerminatorInst. It returns TerminatorInst's successor index for given case successor. 4.2 "resolveCaseIndex" converts low level successors index to case index that curresponds to the given successor. Note: There are also related compatability fix patches for dragonegg, klee, llvm-gcc-4.0, llvm-gcc-4.2, safecode, clang. llvm-svn: 149481
2012-02-01 15:49:51 +08:00
if (SI->getNumCases() == 1) {
// Otherwise, we can fold this switch into a conditional branch
// instruction if it has only one non-default destination.
SwitchInst::CaseIt FirstCase = SI->case_begin();
Value *Cond = Builder.CreateICmpEQ(SI->getCondition(),
FirstCase.getCaseValue(), "cond");
// Insert the new branch.
BranchInst *NewBr = Builder.CreateCondBr(Cond,
FirstCase.getCaseSuccessor(),
SI->getDefaultDest());
MDNode* MD = SI->getMetadata(LLVMContext::MD_prof);
if (MD && MD->getNumOperands() == 3) {
ConstantInt *SICase = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(MD->getOperand(2));
ConstantInt *SIDef = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(MD->getOperand(1));
assert(SICase && SIDef);
// The TrueWeight should be the weight for the single case of SI.
NewBr->setMetadata(LLVMContext::MD_prof,
MDBuilder(BB->getContext()).
createBranchWeights(SICase->getValue().getZExtValue(),
SIDef->getValue().getZExtValue()));
}
// Delete the old switch.
SI->eraseFromParent();
return true;
}
return false;
}
if (IndirectBrInst *IBI = dyn_cast<IndirectBrInst>(T)) {
// indirectbr blockaddress(@F, @BB) -> br label @BB
if (BlockAddress *BA =
dyn_cast<BlockAddress>(IBI->getAddress()->stripPointerCasts())) {
BasicBlock *TheOnlyDest = BA->getBasicBlock();
// Insert the new branch.
Builder.CreateBr(TheOnlyDest);
for (unsigned i = 0, e = IBI->getNumDestinations(); i != e; ++i) {
if (IBI->getDestination(i) == TheOnlyDest)
TheOnlyDest = nullptr;
else
IBI->getDestination(i)->removePredecessor(IBI->getParent());
}
Value *Address = IBI->getAddress();
IBI->eraseFromParent();
if (DeleteDeadConditions)
RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions(Address, TLI);
// If we didn't find our destination in the IBI successor list, then we
// have undefined behavior. Replace the unconditional branch with an
// 'unreachable' instruction.
if (TheOnlyDest) {
BB->getTerminator()->eraseFromParent();
new UnreachableInst(BB->getContext(), BB);
}
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// Local dead code elimination.
//
/// isInstructionTriviallyDead - Return true if the result produced by the
/// instruction is not used, and the instruction has no side effects.
///
bool llvm::isInstructionTriviallyDead(Instruction *I,
const TargetLibraryInfo *TLI) {
if (!I->use_empty() || isa<TerminatorInst>(I)) return false;
// We don't want the landingpad instruction removed by anything this general.
if (isa<LandingPadInst>(I))
return false;
// We don't want debug info removed by anything this general, unless
// debug info is empty.
if (DbgDeclareInst *DDI = dyn_cast<DbgDeclareInst>(I)) {
if (DDI->getAddress())
return false;
2011-03-22 06:04:45 +08:00
return true;
}
2011-03-22 06:04:45 +08:00
if (DbgValueInst *DVI = dyn_cast<DbgValueInst>(I)) {
if (DVI->getValue())
return false;
2011-03-22 06:04:45 +08:00
return true;
}
if (!I->mayHaveSideEffects()) return true;
// Special case intrinsics that "may have side effects" but can be deleted
// when dead.
if (IntrinsicInst *II = dyn_cast<IntrinsicInst>(I)) {
// Safe to delete llvm.stacksave if dead.
if (II->getIntrinsicID() == Intrinsic::stacksave)
return true;
// Lifetime intrinsics are dead when their right-hand is undef.
if (II->getIntrinsicID() == Intrinsic::lifetime_start ||
II->getIntrinsicID() == Intrinsic::lifetime_end)
return isa<UndefValue>(II->getArgOperand(1));
}
if (isAllocLikeFn(I, TLI)) return true;
if (CallInst *CI = isFreeCall(I, TLI))
if (Constant *C = dyn_cast<Constant>(CI->getArgOperand(0)))
return C->isNullValue() || isa<UndefValue>(C);
return false;
}
/// RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions - If the specified value is a
/// trivially dead instruction, delete it. If that makes any of its operands
/// trivially dead, delete them too, recursively. Return true if any
/// instructions were deleted.
bool
llvm::RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions(Value *V,
const TargetLibraryInfo *TLI) {
Instruction *I = dyn_cast<Instruction>(V);
if (!I || !I->use_empty() || !isInstructionTriviallyDead(I, TLI))
return false;
SmallVector<Instruction*, 16> DeadInsts;
DeadInsts.push_back(I);
do {
I = DeadInsts.pop_back_val();
// Null out all of the instruction's operands to see if any operand becomes
// dead as we go.
for (unsigned i = 0, e = I->getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i) {
Value *OpV = I->getOperand(i);
I->setOperand(i, nullptr);
if (!OpV->use_empty()) continue;
// If the operand is an instruction that became dead as we nulled out the
// operand, and if it is 'trivially' dead, delete it in a future loop
// iteration.
if (Instruction *OpI = dyn_cast<Instruction>(OpV))
if (isInstructionTriviallyDead(OpI, TLI))
DeadInsts.push_back(OpI);
}
I->eraseFromParent();
} while (!DeadInsts.empty());
return true;
}
/// areAllUsesEqual - Check whether the uses of a value are all the same.
/// This is similar to Instruction::hasOneUse() except this will also return
/// true when there are no uses or multiple uses that all refer to the same
/// value.
static bool areAllUsesEqual(Instruction *I) {
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value. This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] llvm-svn: 203364
2014-03-09 11:16:01 +08:00
Value::user_iterator UI = I->user_begin();
Value::user_iterator UE = I->user_end();
if (UI == UE)
return true;
User *TheUse = *UI;
for (++UI; UI != UE; ++UI) {
if (*UI != TheUse)
return false;
}
return true;
}
/// RecursivelyDeleteDeadPHINode - If the specified value is an effectively
/// dead PHI node, due to being a def-use chain of single-use nodes that
/// either forms a cycle or is terminated by a trivially dead instruction,
/// delete it. If that makes any of its operands trivially dead, delete them
/// too, recursively. Return true if a change was made.
bool llvm::RecursivelyDeleteDeadPHINode(PHINode *PN,
const TargetLibraryInfo *TLI) {
SmallPtrSet<Instruction*, 4> Visited;
for (Instruction *I = PN; areAllUsesEqual(I) && !I->mayHaveSideEffects();
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value. This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] llvm-svn: 203364
2014-03-09 11:16:01 +08:00
I = cast<Instruction>(*I->user_begin())) {
if (I->use_empty())
return RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions(I, TLI);
// If we find an instruction more than once, we're on a cycle that
// won't prove fruitful.
if (!Visited.insert(I)) {
// Break the cycle and delete the instruction and its operands.
I->replaceAllUsesWith(UndefValue::get(I->getType()));
(void)RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions(I, TLI);
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
2010-01-13 03:40:54 +08:00
/// SimplifyInstructionsInBlock - Scan the specified basic block and try to
/// simplify any instructions in it and recursively delete dead instructions.
///
/// This returns true if it changed the code, note that it can delete
/// instructions in other blocks as well in this block.
bool llvm::SimplifyInstructionsInBlock(BasicBlock *BB, const DataLayout *TD,
const TargetLibraryInfo *TLI) {
2010-01-13 03:40:54 +08:00
bool MadeChange = false;
#ifndef NDEBUG
// In debug builds, ensure that the terminator of the block is never replaced
// or deleted by these simplifications. The idea of simplification is that it
// cannot introduce new instructions, and there is no way to replace the
// terminator of a block without introducing a new instruction.
AssertingVH<Instruction> TerminatorVH(--BB->end());
#endif
for (BasicBlock::iterator BI = BB->begin(), E = --BB->end(); BI != E; ) {
assert(!BI->isTerminator());
2010-01-13 03:40:54 +08:00
Instruction *Inst = BI++;
WeakVH BIHandle(BI);
if (recursivelySimplifyInstruction(Inst, TD, TLI)) {
2010-01-13 03:40:54 +08:00
MadeChange = true;
if (BIHandle != BI)
2010-01-13 03:40:54 +08:00
BI = BB->begin();
continue;
}
MadeChange |= RecursivelyDeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions(Inst, TLI);
if (BIHandle != BI)
BI = BB->begin();
2010-01-13 03:40:54 +08:00
}
return MadeChange;
}
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// Control Flow Graph Restructuring.
//
/// RemovePredecessorAndSimplify - Like BasicBlock::removePredecessor, this
/// method is called when we're about to delete Pred as a predecessor of BB. If
/// BB contains any PHI nodes, this drops the entries in the PHI nodes for Pred.
///
/// Unlike the removePredecessor method, this attempts to simplify uses of PHI
/// nodes that collapse into identity values. For example, if we have:
/// x = phi(1, 0, 0, 0)
/// y = and x, z
///
/// .. and delete the predecessor corresponding to the '1', this will attempt to
/// recursively fold the and to 0.
void llvm::RemovePredecessorAndSimplify(BasicBlock *BB, BasicBlock *Pred,
DataLayout *TD) {
// This only adjusts blocks with PHI nodes.
if (!isa<PHINode>(BB->begin()))
return;
// Remove the entries for Pred from the PHI nodes in BB, but do not simplify
// them down. This will leave us with single entry phi nodes and other phis
// that can be removed.
BB->removePredecessor(Pred, true);
WeakVH PhiIt = &BB->front();
while (PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(PhiIt)) {
PhiIt = &*++BasicBlock::iterator(cast<Instruction>(PhiIt));
Value *OldPhiIt = PhiIt;
if (!recursivelySimplifyInstruction(PN, TD))
continue;
// If recursive simplification ended up deleting the next PHI node we would
// iterate to, then our iterator is invalid, restart scanning from the top
// of the block.
if (PhiIt != OldPhiIt) PhiIt = &BB->front();
}
}
/// MergeBasicBlockIntoOnlyPred - DestBB is a block with one predecessor and its
/// predecessor is known to have one successor (DestBB!). Eliminate the edge
/// between them, moving the instructions in the predecessor into DestBB and
/// deleting the predecessor block.
///
void llvm::MergeBasicBlockIntoOnlyPred(BasicBlock *DestBB, Pass *P) {
// If BB has single-entry PHI nodes, fold them.
while (PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(DestBB->begin())) {
Value *NewVal = PN->getIncomingValue(0);
// Replace self referencing PHI with undef, it must be dead.
if (NewVal == PN) NewVal = UndefValue::get(PN->getType());
PN->replaceAllUsesWith(NewVal);
PN->eraseFromParent();
}
BasicBlock *PredBB = DestBB->getSinglePredecessor();
assert(PredBB && "Block doesn't have a single predecessor!");
// Zap anything that took the address of DestBB. Not doing this will give the
// address an invalid value.
if (DestBB->hasAddressTaken()) {
BlockAddress *BA = BlockAddress::get(DestBB);
Constant *Replacement =
ConstantInt::get(llvm::Type::getInt32Ty(BA->getContext()), 1);
BA->replaceAllUsesWith(ConstantExpr::getIntToPtr(Replacement,
BA->getType()));
BA->destroyConstant();
}
// Anything that branched to PredBB now branches to DestBB.
PredBB->replaceAllUsesWith(DestBB);
// Splice all the instructions from PredBB to DestBB.
PredBB->getTerminator()->eraseFromParent();
DestBB->getInstList().splice(DestBB->begin(), PredBB->getInstList());
if (P) {
if (DominatorTreeWrapperPass *DTWP =
P->getAnalysisIfAvailable<DominatorTreeWrapperPass>()) {
DominatorTree &DT = DTWP->getDomTree();
BasicBlock *PredBBIDom = DT.getNode(PredBB)->getIDom()->getBlock();
DT.changeImmediateDominator(DestBB, PredBBIDom);
DT.eraseNode(PredBB);
}
}
// Nuke BB.
PredBB->eraseFromParent();
}
/// CanMergeValues - Return true if we can choose one of these values to use
/// in place of the other. Note that we will always choose the non-undef
/// value to keep.
static bool CanMergeValues(Value *First, Value *Second) {
return First == Second || isa<UndefValue>(First) || isa<UndefValue>(Second);
}
/// CanPropagatePredecessorsForPHIs - Return true if we can fold BB, an
/// almost-empty BB ending in an unconditional branch to Succ, into Succ.
///
/// Assumption: Succ is the single successor for BB.
///
static bool CanPropagatePredecessorsForPHIs(BasicBlock *BB, BasicBlock *Succ) {
assert(*succ_begin(BB) == Succ && "Succ is not successor of BB!");
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Looking to fold " << BB->getName() << " into "
<< Succ->getName() << "\n");
// Shortcut, if there is only a single predecessor it must be BB and merging
// is always safe
if (Succ->getSinglePredecessor()) return true;
// Make a list of the predecessors of BB
SmallPtrSet<BasicBlock*, 16> BBPreds(pred_begin(BB), pred_end(BB));
// Look at all the phi nodes in Succ, to see if they present a conflict when
// merging these blocks
for (BasicBlock::iterator I = Succ->begin(); isa<PHINode>(I); ++I) {
PHINode *PN = cast<PHINode>(I);
// If the incoming value from BB is again a PHINode in
// BB which has the same incoming value for *PI as PN does, we can
// merge the phi nodes and then the blocks can still be merged
PHINode *BBPN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(PN->getIncomingValueForBlock(BB));
if (BBPN && BBPN->getParent() == BB) {
for (unsigned PI = 0, PE = PN->getNumIncomingValues(); PI != PE; ++PI) {
BasicBlock *IBB = PN->getIncomingBlock(PI);
if (BBPreds.count(IBB) &&
!CanMergeValues(BBPN->getIncomingValueForBlock(IBB),
PN->getIncomingValue(PI))) {
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Can't fold, phi node " << PN->getName() << " in "
<< Succ->getName() << " is conflicting with "
<< BBPN->getName() << " with regard to common predecessor "
<< IBB->getName() << "\n");
return false;
}
}
} else {
Value* Val = PN->getIncomingValueForBlock(BB);
for (unsigned PI = 0, PE = PN->getNumIncomingValues(); PI != PE; ++PI) {
// See if the incoming value for the common predecessor is equal to the
// one for BB, in which case this phi node will not prevent the merging
// of the block.
BasicBlock *IBB = PN->getIncomingBlock(PI);
if (BBPreds.count(IBB) &&
!CanMergeValues(Val, PN->getIncomingValue(PI))) {
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Can't fold, phi node " << PN->getName() << " in "
<< Succ->getName() << " is conflicting with regard to common "
<< "predecessor " << IBB->getName() << "\n");
return false;
}
}
}
}
return true;
}
typedef SmallVector<BasicBlock *, 16> PredBlockVector;
typedef DenseMap<BasicBlock *, Value *> IncomingValueMap;
/// \brief Determines the value to use as the phi node input for a block.
///
/// Select between \p OldVal any value that we know flows from \p BB
/// to a particular phi on the basis of which one (if either) is not
/// undef. Update IncomingValues based on the selected value.
///
/// \param OldVal The value we are considering selecting.
/// \param BB The block that the value flows in from.
/// \param IncomingValues A map from block-to-value for other phi inputs
/// that we have examined.
///
/// \returns the selected value.
static Value *selectIncomingValueForBlock(Value *OldVal, BasicBlock *BB,
IncomingValueMap &IncomingValues) {
if (!isa<UndefValue>(OldVal)) {
assert((!IncomingValues.count(BB) ||
IncomingValues.find(BB)->second == OldVal) &&
"Expected OldVal to match incoming value from BB!");
IncomingValues.insert(std::make_pair(BB, OldVal));
return OldVal;
}
IncomingValueMap::const_iterator It = IncomingValues.find(BB);
if (It != IncomingValues.end()) return It->second;
return OldVal;
}
/// \brief Create a map from block to value for the operands of a
/// given phi.
///
/// Create a map from block to value for each non-undef value flowing
/// into \p PN.
///
/// \param PN The phi we are collecting the map for.
/// \param IncomingValues [out] The map from block to value for this phi.
static void gatherIncomingValuesToPhi(PHINode *PN,
IncomingValueMap &IncomingValues) {
for (unsigned i = 0, e = PN->getNumIncomingValues(); i != e; ++i) {
BasicBlock *BB = PN->getIncomingBlock(i);
Value *V = PN->getIncomingValue(i);
if (!isa<UndefValue>(V))
IncomingValues.insert(std::make_pair(BB, V));
}
}
/// \brief Replace the incoming undef values to a phi with the values
/// from a block-to-value map.
///
/// \param PN The phi we are replacing the undefs in.
/// \param IncomingValues A map from block to value.
static void replaceUndefValuesInPhi(PHINode *PN,
const IncomingValueMap &IncomingValues) {
for (unsigned i = 0, e = PN->getNumIncomingValues(); i != e; ++i) {
Value *V = PN->getIncomingValue(i);
if (!isa<UndefValue>(V)) continue;
BasicBlock *BB = PN->getIncomingBlock(i);
IncomingValueMap::const_iterator It = IncomingValues.find(BB);
if (It == IncomingValues.end()) continue;
PN->setIncomingValue(i, It->second);
}
}
/// \brief Replace a value flowing from a block to a phi with
/// potentially multiple instances of that value flowing from the
/// block's predecessors to the phi.
///
/// \param BB The block with the value flowing into the phi.
/// \param BBPreds The predecessors of BB.
/// \param PN The phi that we are updating.
static void redirectValuesFromPredecessorsToPhi(BasicBlock *BB,
const PredBlockVector &BBPreds,
PHINode *PN) {
Value *OldVal = PN->removeIncomingValue(BB, false);
assert(OldVal && "No entry in PHI for Pred BB!");
IncomingValueMap IncomingValues;
// We are merging two blocks - BB, and the block containing PN - and
// as a result we need to redirect edges from the predecessors of BB
// to go to the block containing PN, and update PN
// accordingly. Since we allow merging blocks in the case where the
// predecessor and successor blocks both share some predecessors,
// and where some of those common predecessors might have undef
// values flowing into PN, we want to rewrite those values to be
// consistent with the non-undef values.
gatherIncomingValuesToPhi(PN, IncomingValues);
// If this incoming value is one of the PHI nodes in BB, the new entries
// in the PHI node are the entries from the old PHI.
if (isa<PHINode>(OldVal) && cast<PHINode>(OldVal)->getParent() == BB) {
PHINode *OldValPN = cast<PHINode>(OldVal);
for (unsigned i = 0, e = OldValPN->getNumIncomingValues(); i != e; ++i) {
// Note that, since we are merging phi nodes and BB and Succ might
// have common predecessors, we could end up with a phi node with
// identical incoming branches. This will be cleaned up later (and
// will trigger asserts if we try to clean it up now, without also
// simplifying the corresponding conditional branch).
BasicBlock *PredBB = OldValPN->getIncomingBlock(i);
Value *PredVal = OldValPN->getIncomingValue(i);
Value *Selected = selectIncomingValueForBlock(PredVal, PredBB,
IncomingValues);
// And add a new incoming value for this predecessor for the
// newly retargeted branch.
PN->addIncoming(Selected, PredBB);
}
} else {
for (unsigned i = 0, e = BBPreds.size(); i != e; ++i) {
// Update existing incoming values in PN for this
// predecessor of BB.
BasicBlock *PredBB = BBPreds[i];
Value *Selected = selectIncomingValueForBlock(OldVal, PredBB,
IncomingValues);
// And add a new incoming value for this predecessor for the
// newly retargeted branch.
PN->addIncoming(Selected, PredBB);
}
}
replaceUndefValuesInPhi(PN, IncomingValues);
}
/// TryToSimplifyUncondBranchFromEmptyBlock - BB is known to contain an
/// unconditional branch, and contains no instructions other than PHI nodes,
/// potential side-effect free intrinsics and the branch. If possible,
/// eliminate BB by rewriting all the predecessors to branch to the successor
/// block and return true. If we can't transform, return false.
bool llvm::TryToSimplifyUncondBranchFromEmptyBlock(BasicBlock *BB) {
assert(BB != &BB->getParent()->getEntryBlock() &&
"TryToSimplifyUncondBranchFromEmptyBlock called on entry block!");
// We can't eliminate infinite loops.
BasicBlock *Succ = cast<BranchInst>(BB->getTerminator())->getSuccessor(0);
if (BB == Succ) return false;
// Check to see if merging these blocks would cause conflicts for any of the
// phi nodes in BB or Succ. If not, we can safely merge.
if (!CanPropagatePredecessorsForPHIs(BB, Succ)) return false;
// Check for cases where Succ has multiple predecessors and a PHI node in BB
// has uses which will not disappear when the PHI nodes are merged. It is
// possible to handle such cases, but difficult: it requires checking whether
// BB dominates Succ, which is non-trivial to calculate in the case where
// Succ has multiple predecessors. Also, it requires checking whether
2012-12-24 16:52:53 +08:00
// constructing the necessary self-referential PHI node doesn't introduce any
// conflicts; this isn't too difficult, but the previous code for doing this
// was incorrect.
//
// Note that if this check finds a live use, BB dominates Succ, so BB is
// something like a loop pre-header (or rarely, a part of an irreducible CFG);
// folding the branch isn't profitable in that case anyway.
if (!Succ->getSinglePredecessor()) {
BasicBlock::iterator BBI = BB->begin();
while (isa<PHINode>(*BBI)) {
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value. This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] llvm-svn: 203364
2014-03-09 11:16:01 +08:00
for (Use &U : BBI->uses()) {
if (PHINode* PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(U.getUser())) {
if (PN->getIncomingBlock(U) != BB)
return false;
} else {
return false;
}
}
++BBI;
}
}
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Killing Trivial BB: \n" << *BB);
if (isa<PHINode>(Succ->begin())) {
// If there is more than one pred of succ, and there are PHI nodes in
// the successor, then we need to add incoming edges for the PHI nodes
//
const PredBlockVector BBPreds(pred_begin(BB), pred_end(BB));
// Loop over all of the PHI nodes in the successor of BB.
for (BasicBlock::iterator I = Succ->begin(); isa<PHINode>(I); ++I) {
PHINode *PN = cast<PHINode>(I);
redirectValuesFromPredecessorsToPhi(BB, BBPreds, PN);
}
}
if (Succ->getSinglePredecessor()) {
// BB is the only predecessor of Succ, so Succ will end up with exactly
// the same predecessors BB had.
// Copy over any phi, debug or lifetime instruction.
BB->getTerminator()->eraseFromParent();
Succ->getInstList().splice(Succ->getFirstNonPHI(), BB->getInstList());
} else {
while (PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(&BB->front())) {
// We explicitly check for such uses in CanPropagatePredecessorsForPHIs.
assert(PN->use_empty() && "There shouldn't be any uses here!");
PN->eraseFromParent();
}
}
// Everything that jumped to BB now goes to Succ.
BB->replaceAllUsesWith(Succ);
if (!Succ->hasName()) Succ->takeName(BB);
BB->eraseFromParent(); // Delete the old basic block.
return true;
}
/// EliminateDuplicatePHINodes - Check for and eliminate duplicate PHI
/// nodes in this block. This doesn't try to be clever about PHI nodes
/// which differ only in the order of the incoming values, but instcombine
/// orders them so it usually won't matter.
///
bool llvm::EliminateDuplicatePHINodes(BasicBlock *BB) {
bool Changed = false;
// This implementation doesn't currently consider undef operands
2011-06-28 11:57:31 +08:00
// specially. Theoretically, two phis which are identical except for
// one having an undef where the other doesn't could be collapsed.
// Map from PHI hash values to PHI nodes. If multiple PHIs have
// the same hash value, the element is the first PHI in the
// linked list in CollisionMap.
DenseMap<uintptr_t, PHINode *> HashMap;
// Maintain linked lists of PHI nodes with common hash values.
DenseMap<PHINode *, PHINode *> CollisionMap;
// Examine each PHI.
for (BasicBlock::iterator I = BB->begin();
PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(I++); ) {
// Compute a hash value on the operands. Instcombine will likely have sorted
// them, which helps expose duplicates, but we have to check all the
// operands to be safe in case instcombine hasn't run.
uintptr_t Hash = 0;
// This hash algorithm is quite weak as hash functions go, but it seems
// to do a good enough job for this particular purpose, and is very quick.
for (User::op_iterator I = PN->op_begin(), E = PN->op_end(); I != E; ++I) {
Hash ^= reinterpret_cast<uintptr_t>(static_cast<Value *>(*I));
Hash = (Hash << 7) | (Hash >> (sizeof(uintptr_t) * CHAR_BIT - 7));
}
for (PHINode::block_iterator I = PN->block_begin(), E = PN->block_end();
I != E; ++I) {
Hash ^= reinterpret_cast<uintptr_t>(static_cast<BasicBlock *>(*I));
Hash = (Hash << 7) | (Hash >> (sizeof(uintptr_t) * CHAR_BIT - 7));
}
// Avoid colliding with the DenseMap sentinels ~0 and ~0-1.
Hash >>= 1;
// If we've never seen this hash value before, it's a unique PHI.
std::pair<DenseMap<uintptr_t, PHINode *>::iterator, bool> Pair =
HashMap.insert(std::make_pair(Hash, PN));
if (Pair.second) continue;
// Otherwise it's either a duplicate or a hash collision.
for (PHINode *OtherPN = Pair.first->second; ; ) {
if (OtherPN->isIdenticalTo(PN)) {
// A duplicate. Replace this PHI with its duplicate.
PN->replaceAllUsesWith(OtherPN);
PN->eraseFromParent();
Changed = true;
break;
}
// A non-duplicate hash collision.
DenseMap<PHINode *, PHINode *>::iterator I = CollisionMap.find(OtherPN);
if (I == CollisionMap.end()) {
// Set this PHI to be the head of the linked list of colliding PHIs.
PHINode *Old = Pair.first->second;
Pair.first->second = PN;
CollisionMap[PN] = Old;
break;
}
// Proceed to the next PHI in the list.
OtherPN = I->second;
}
}
return Changed;
}
/// enforceKnownAlignment - If the specified pointer points to an object that
/// we control, modify the object's alignment to PrefAlign. This isn't
/// often possible though. If alignment is important, a more reliable approach
/// is to simply align all global variables and allocation instructions to
/// their preferred alignment from the beginning.
///
static unsigned enforceKnownAlignment(Value *V, unsigned Align,
unsigned PrefAlign, const DataLayout *TD) {
V = V->stripPointerCasts();
if (AllocaInst *AI = dyn_cast<AllocaInst>(V)) {
// If the preferred alignment is greater than the natural stack alignment
// then don't round up. This avoids dynamic stack realignment.
if (TD && TD->exceedsNaturalStackAlignment(PrefAlign))
return Align;
// If there is a requested alignment and if this is an alloca, round up.
if (AI->getAlignment() >= PrefAlign)
return AI->getAlignment();
AI->setAlignment(PrefAlign);
return PrefAlign;
}
if (GlobalValue *GV = dyn_cast<GlobalValue>(V)) {
// If there is a large requested alignment and we can, bump up the alignment
// of the global.
if (GV->isDeclaration()) return Align;
// If the memory we set aside for the global may not be the memory used by
// the final program then it is impossible for us to reliably enforce the
// preferred alignment.
if (GV->isWeakForLinker()) return Align;
if (GV->getAlignment() >= PrefAlign)
return GV->getAlignment();
// We can only increase the alignment of the global if it has no alignment
// specified or if it is not assigned a section. If it is assigned a
// section, the global could be densely packed with other objects in the
// section, increasing the alignment could cause padding issues.
if (!GV->hasSection() || GV->getAlignment() == 0)
GV->setAlignment(PrefAlign);
return GV->getAlignment();
}
return Align;
}
/// getOrEnforceKnownAlignment - If the specified pointer has an alignment that
/// we can determine, return it, otherwise return 0. If PrefAlign is specified,
/// and it is more than the alignment of the ultimate object, see if we can
/// increase the alignment of the ultimate object, making this check succeed.
unsigned llvm::getOrEnforceKnownAlignment(Value *V, unsigned PrefAlign,
const DataLayout *DL) {
assert(V->getType()->isPointerTy() &&
"getOrEnforceKnownAlignment expects a pointer!");
unsigned BitWidth = DL ? DL->getPointerTypeSizeInBits(V->getType()) : 64;
APInt KnownZero(BitWidth, 0), KnownOne(BitWidth, 0);
ComputeMaskedBits(V, KnownZero, KnownOne, DL);
unsigned TrailZ = KnownZero.countTrailingOnes();
2013-07-24 06:20:57 +08:00
// Avoid trouble with ridiculously large TrailZ values, such as
// those computed from a null pointer.
TrailZ = std::min(TrailZ, unsigned(sizeof(unsigned) * CHAR_BIT - 1));
unsigned Align = 1u << std::min(BitWidth - 1, TrailZ);
// LLVM doesn't support alignments larger than this currently.
Align = std::min(Align, +Value::MaximumAlignment);
if (PrefAlign > Align)
Align = enforceKnownAlignment(V, Align, PrefAlign, DL);
// We don't need to make any adjustment.
return Align;
}
///===---------------------------------------------------------------------===//
/// Dbg Intrinsic utilities
///
/// See if there is a dbg.value intrinsic for DIVar before I.
static bool LdStHasDebugValue(DIVariable &DIVar, Instruction *I) {
// Since we can't guarantee that the original dbg.declare instrinsic
// is removed by LowerDbgDeclare(), we need to make sure that we are
// not inserting the same dbg.value intrinsic over and over.
llvm::BasicBlock::InstListType::iterator PrevI(I);
if (PrevI != I->getParent()->getInstList().begin()) {
--PrevI;
if (DbgValueInst *DVI = dyn_cast<DbgValueInst>(PrevI))
if (DVI->getValue() == I->getOperand(0) &&
DVI->getOffset() == 0 &&
DVI->getVariable() == DIVar)
return true;
}
return false;
}
/// Inserts a llvm.dbg.value intrinsic before a store to an alloca'd value
/// that has an associated llvm.dbg.decl intrinsic.
bool llvm::ConvertDebugDeclareToDebugValue(DbgDeclareInst *DDI,
StoreInst *SI, DIBuilder &Builder) {
DIVariable DIVar(DDI->getVariable());
assert((!DIVar || DIVar.isVariable()) &&
"Variable in DbgDeclareInst should be either null or a DIVariable.");
if (!DIVar)
return false;
if (LdStHasDebugValue(DIVar, SI))
return true;
Instruction *DbgVal = nullptr;
// If an argument is zero extended then use argument directly. The ZExt
// may be zapped by an optimization pass in future.
Argument *ExtendedArg = nullptr;
if (ZExtInst *ZExt = dyn_cast<ZExtInst>(SI->getOperand(0)))
ExtendedArg = dyn_cast<Argument>(ZExt->getOperand(0));
if (SExtInst *SExt = dyn_cast<SExtInst>(SI->getOperand(0)))
ExtendedArg = dyn_cast<Argument>(SExt->getOperand(0));
if (ExtendedArg)
DbgVal = Builder.insertDbgValueIntrinsic(ExtendedArg, 0, DIVar, SI);
else
DbgVal = Builder.insertDbgValueIntrinsic(SI->getOperand(0), 0, DIVar, SI);
DbgVal->setDebugLoc(DDI->getDebugLoc());
return true;
}
/// Inserts a llvm.dbg.value intrinsic before a load of an alloca'd value
/// that has an associated llvm.dbg.decl intrinsic.
bool llvm::ConvertDebugDeclareToDebugValue(DbgDeclareInst *DDI,
LoadInst *LI, DIBuilder &Builder) {
DIVariable DIVar(DDI->getVariable());
assert((!DIVar || DIVar.isVariable()) &&
"Variable in DbgDeclareInst should be either null or a DIVariable.");
if (!DIVar)
return false;
if (LdStHasDebugValue(DIVar, LI))
return true;
Instruction *DbgVal =
Builder.insertDbgValueIntrinsic(LI->getOperand(0), 0,
DIVar, LI);
DbgVal->setDebugLoc(DDI->getDebugLoc());
return true;
}
/// LowerDbgDeclare - Lowers llvm.dbg.declare intrinsics into appropriate set
/// of llvm.dbg.value intrinsics.
bool llvm::LowerDbgDeclare(Function &F) {
DIBuilder DIB(*F.getParent());
SmallVector<DbgDeclareInst *, 4> Dbgs;
for (auto &FI : F)
for (BasicBlock::iterator BI : FI)
if (auto DDI = dyn_cast<DbgDeclareInst>(BI))
Dbgs.push_back(DDI);
if (Dbgs.empty())
return false;
for (auto &I : Dbgs) {
DbgDeclareInst *DDI = I;
AllocaInst *AI = dyn_cast_or_null<AllocaInst>(DDI->getAddress());
// If this is an alloca for a scalar variable, insert a dbg.value
// at each load and store to the alloca and erase the dbg.declare.
if (AI && !AI->isArrayAllocation()) {
// We only remove the dbg.declare intrinsic if all uses are
// converted to dbg.value intrinsics.
bool RemoveDDI = true;
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value. This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] llvm-svn: 203364
2014-03-09 11:16:01 +08:00
for (User *U : AI->users())
if (StoreInst *SI = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(U))
ConvertDebugDeclareToDebugValue(DDI, SI, DIB);
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value. This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] llvm-svn: 203364
2014-03-09 11:16:01 +08:00
else if (LoadInst *LI = dyn_cast<LoadInst>(U))
ConvertDebugDeclareToDebugValue(DDI, LI, DIB);
else
RemoveDDI = false;
if (RemoveDDI)
DDI->eraseFromParent();
}
}
return true;
}
/// FindAllocaDbgDeclare - Finds the llvm.dbg.declare intrinsic describing the
/// alloca 'V', if any.
DbgDeclareInst *llvm::FindAllocaDbgDeclare(Value *V) {
if (MDNode *DebugNode = MDNode::getIfExists(V->getContext(), V))
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value. This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] llvm-svn: 203364
2014-03-09 11:16:01 +08:00
for (User *U : DebugNode->users())
if (DbgDeclareInst *DDI = dyn_cast<DbgDeclareInst>(U))
return DDI;
return nullptr;
}
bool llvm::replaceDbgDeclareForAlloca(AllocaInst *AI, Value *NewAllocaAddress,
DIBuilder &Builder) {
DbgDeclareInst *DDI = FindAllocaDbgDeclare(AI);
if (!DDI)
return false;
DIVariable DIVar(DDI->getVariable());
assert((!DIVar || DIVar.isVariable()) &&
"Variable in DbgDeclareInst should be either null or a DIVariable.");
if (!DIVar)
return false;
// Create a copy of the original DIDescriptor for user variable, appending
// "deref" operation to a list of address elements, as new llvm.dbg.declare
// will take a value storing address of the memory for variable, not
// alloca itself.
Type *Int64Ty = Type::getInt64Ty(AI->getContext());
SmallVector<Value*, 4> NewDIVarAddress;
if (DIVar.hasComplexAddress()) {
for (unsigned i = 0, n = DIVar.getNumAddrElements(); i < n; ++i) {
NewDIVarAddress.push_back(
ConstantInt::get(Int64Ty, DIVar.getAddrElement(i)));
}
}
NewDIVarAddress.push_back(ConstantInt::get(Int64Ty, DIBuilder::OpDeref));
DIVariable NewDIVar = Builder.createComplexVariable(
DIVar.getTag(), DIVar.getContext(), DIVar.getName(),
DIVar.getFile(), DIVar.getLineNumber(), DIVar.getType(),
NewDIVarAddress, DIVar.getArgNumber());
// Insert llvm.dbg.declare in the same basic block as the original alloca,
// and remove old llvm.dbg.declare.
BasicBlock *BB = AI->getParent();
Builder.insertDeclare(NewAllocaAddress, NewDIVar, BB);
DDI->eraseFromParent();
return true;
}
/// changeToUnreachable - Insert an unreachable instruction before the specified
/// instruction, making it and the rest of the code in the block dead.
static void changeToUnreachable(Instruction *I, bool UseLLVMTrap) {
BasicBlock *BB = I->getParent();
// Loop over all of the successors, removing BB's entry from any PHI
// nodes.
for (succ_iterator SI = succ_begin(BB), SE = succ_end(BB); SI != SE; ++SI)
(*SI)->removePredecessor(BB);
// Insert a call to llvm.trap right before this. This turns the undefined
// behavior into a hard fail instead of falling through into random code.
if (UseLLVMTrap) {
Function *TrapFn =
Intrinsic::getDeclaration(BB->getParent()->getParent(), Intrinsic::trap);
CallInst *CallTrap = CallInst::Create(TrapFn, "", I);
CallTrap->setDebugLoc(I->getDebugLoc());
}
new UnreachableInst(I->getContext(), I);
// All instructions after this are dead.
BasicBlock::iterator BBI = I, BBE = BB->end();
while (BBI != BBE) {
if (!BBI->use_empty())
BBI->replaceAllUsesWith(UndefValue::get(BBI->getType()));
BB->getInstList().erase(BBI++);
}
}
/// changeToCall - Convert the specified invoke into a normal call.
static void changeToCall(InvokeInst *II) {
SmallVector<Value*, 8> Args(II->op_begin(), II->op_end() - 3);
CallInst *NewCall = CallInst::Create(II->getCalledValue(), Args, "", II);
NewCall->takeName(II);
NewCall->setCallingConv(II->getCallingConv());
NewCall->setAttributes(II->getAttributes());
NewCall->setDebugLoc(II->getDebugLoc());
II->replaceAllUsesWith(NewCall);
// Follow the call by a branch to the normal destination.
BranchInst::Create(II->getNormalDest(), II);
// Update PHI nodes in the unwind destination
II->getUnwindDest()->removePredecessor(II->getParent());
II->eraseFromParent();
}
static bool markAliveBlocks(BasicBlock *BB,
SmallPtrSet<BasicBlock*, 128> &Reachable) {
SmallVector<BasicBlock*, 128> Worklist;
Worklist.push_back(BB);
Reachable.insert(BB);
bool Changed = false;
do {
BB = Worklist.pop_back_val();
// Do a quick scan of the basic block, turning any obviously unreachable
// instructions into LLVM unreachable insts. The instruction combining pass
// canonicalizes unreachable insts into stores to null or undef.
for (BasicBlock::iterator BBI = BB->begin(), E = BB->end(); BBI != E;++BBI){
if (CallInst *CI = dyn_cast<CallInst>(BBI)) {
if (CI->doesNotReturn()) {
// If we found a call to a no-return function, insert an unreachable
// instruction after it. Make sure there isn't *already* one there
// though.
++BBI;
if (!isa<UnreachableInst>(BBI)) {
// Don't insert a call to llvm.trap right before the unreachable.
changeToUnreachable(BBI, false);
Changed = true;
}
break;
}
}
// Store to undef and store to null are undefined and used to signal that
// they should be changed to unreachable by passes that can't modify the
// CFG.
if (StoreInst *SI = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(BBI)) {
// Don't touch volatile stores.
if (SI->isVolatile()) continue;
Value *Ptr = SI->getOperand(1);
if (isa<UndefValue>(Ptr) ||
(isa<ConstantPointerNull>(Ptr) &&
SI->getPointerAddressSpace() == 0)) {
changeToUnreachable(SI, true);
Changed = true;
break;
}
}
}
// Turn invokes that call 'nounwind' functions into ordinary calls.
if (InvokeInst *II = dyn_cast<InvokeInst>(BB->getTerminator())) {
Value *Callee = II->getCalledValue();
if (isa<ConstantPointerNull>(Callee) || isa<UndefValue>(Callee)) {
changeToUnreachable(II, true);
Changed = true;
} else if (II->doesNotThrow()) {
if (II->use_empty() && II->onlyReadsMemory()) {
// jump to the normal destination branch.
BranchInst::Create(II->getNormalDest(), II);
II->getUnwindDest()->removePredecessor(II->getParent());
II->eraseFromParent();
} else
changeToCall(II);
Changed = true;
}
}
Changed |= ConstantFoldTerminator(BB, true);
for (succ_iterator SI = succ_begin(BB), SE = succ_end(BB); SI != SE; ++SI)
if (Reachable.insert(*SI))
Worklist.push_back(*SI);
} while (!Worklist.empty());
return Changed;
}
/// removeUnreachableBlocksFromFn - Remove blocks that are not reachable, even
/// if they are in a dead cycle. Return true if a change was made, false
/// otherwise.
bool llvm::removeUnreachableBlocks(Function &F) {
SmallPtrSet<BasicBlock*, 128> Reachable;
bool Changed = markAliveBlocks(F.begin(), Reachable);
// If there are unreachable blocks in the CFG...
if (Reachable.size() == F.size())
return Changed;
assert(Reachable.size() < F.size());
NumRemoved += F.size()-Reachable.size();
// Loop over all of the basic blocks that are not reachable, dropping all of
// their internal references...
for (Function::iterator BB = ++F.begin(), E = F.end(); BB != E; ++BB) {
if (Reachable.count(BB))
continue;
for (succ_iterator SI = succ_begin(BB), SE = succ_end(BB); SI != SE; ++SI)
if (Reachable.count(*SI))
(*SI)->removePredecessor(BB);
BB->dropAllReferences();
}
for (Function::iterator I = ++F.begin(); I != F.end();)
if (!Reachable.count(I))
I = F.getBasicBlockList().erase(I);
else
++I;
return true;
}