[lit, python] Always add quotes around the python path in lit
Summary:
The issue with the python path is that the path to python on Windows can contain spaces. To make the tests always work, the path to python needs to be surrounded by quotes.
This change updates several configuration files which specify the path to python as a substitution and also remove quotes from existing tests.
Reviewers: asmith, zturner, alexshap, jakehehrlich
Reviewed By: zturner, alexshap, jakehehrlich
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, nemanjai, eraman, kbarton, jakehehrlich, steven_wu, dexonsmith, stella.stamenova, delcypher, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50206
llvm-svn: 339073
2018-08-07 06:37:44 +08:00
|
|
|
// RUN: llvm-tblgen -dump-json %s | %python %S/JSON-check.py %s
|
[TableGen] Add a general-purpose JSON backend.
The aim of this backend is to output everything TableGen knows about
the record set, similarly to the default -print-records backend. But
where -print-records produces output in TableGen's input syntax
(convenient for humans to read), this backend produces it as
structured JSON data, which is convenient for loading into standard
scripting languages such as Python, in order to extract information
from the data set in an automated way.
The output data contains a JSON representation of the variable
definitions in output 'def' records, and a few pieces of metadata such
as which of those definitions are tagged with the 'field' prefix and
which defs are derived from which classes. It doesn't dump out
absolutely every piece of knowledge it _could_ produce, such as type
information and complicated arithmetic operator nodes in abstract
superclasses; the main aim is to allow consumers of this JSON dump to
essentially act as new backends, and backends don't generally need to
depend on that kind of data.
The new backend is implemented as an EmitJSON() function similar to
all of llvm-tblgen's other EmitFoo functions, except that it lives in
lib/TableGen instead of utils/TableGen on the basis that I'm expecting
to add it to clang-tblgen too in a future patch.
To test it, I've written a Python script that loads the JSON output
and tests properties of it based on comments in the .td source - more
or less like FileCheck, except that the CHECK: lines have Python
expressions after them instead of textual pattern matches.
Reviewers: nhaehnle
Reviewed By: nhaehnle
Subscribers: arichardson, labath, mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46054
llvm-svn: 336771
2018-07-11 16:40:19 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: data['!tablegen_json_version'] == 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: all(data[s]['!name'] == s for s in data if not s.startswith("!"))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class Base {}
|
|
|
|
class Intermediate : Base {}
|
|
|
|
class Derived : Intermediate {}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def D : Intermediate {}
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: 'D' in data['!instanceof']['Base']
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: 'D' in data['!instanceof']['Intermediate']
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: 'D' not in data['!instanceof']['Derived']
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: 'Base' in data['D']['!superclasses']
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: 'Intermediate' in data['D']['!superclasses']
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: 'Derived' not in data['D']['!superclasses']
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def ExampleDagOp;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def FieldKeywordTest {
|
|
|
|
int a;
|
|
|
|
field int b;
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: 'a' not in data['FieldKeywordTest']['!fields']
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: 'b' in data['FieldKeywordTest']['!fields']
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class Variables {
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
string s;
|
|
|
|
bit b;
|
|
|
|
bits<8> bs;
|
|
|
|
code c;
|
|
|
|
list<int> li;
|
|
|
|
Base base;
|
|
|
|
dag d;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
def VarNull : Variables {
|
|
|
|
// A variable not filled in at all has its value set to JSON
|
|
|
|
// 'null', which translates to Python None
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: data['VarNull']['i'] is None
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
def VarPrim : Variables {
|
|
|
|
// Test initializers that map to primitive JSON types
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int i = 3;
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: data['VarPrim']['i'] == 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Integer literals should be emitted in the JSON at full 64-bit
|
|
|
|
// precision, for the benefit of JSON readers that preserve that
|
|
|
|
// much information. Python's is one such.
|
|
|
|
int enormous_pos = 9123456789123456789;
|
|
|
|
int enormous_neg = -9123456789123456789;
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: data['VarPrim']['enormous_pos'] == 9123456789123456789
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: data['VarPrim']['enormous_neg'] == -9123456789123456789
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
string s = "hello, world";
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: data['VarPrim']['s'] == 'hello, world'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bit b = 0;
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: data['VarPrim']['b'] == 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// bits<> arrays are stored in logical order (array[i] is the same
|
|
|
|
// bit identified in .td files as bs{i}), which means the _visual_
|
|
|
|
// order of the list (in default rendering) is reversed.
|
|
|
|
bits<8> bs = { 0,0,0,1,0,1,1,1 };
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: data['VarPrim']['bs'] == [ 1,1,1,0,1,0,0,0 ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
code c = [{ \" }];
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: data['VarPrim']['c'] == r' \" '
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
list<int> li = [ 1, 2, 3, 4 ];
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: data['VarPrim']['li'] == [ 1, 2, 3, 4 ]
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
def VarObj : Variables {
|
|
|
|
// Test initializers that map to JSON objects containing a 'kind'
|
|
|
|
// discriminator
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Base base = D;
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: data['VarObj']['base']['kind'] == 'def'
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: data['VarObj']['base']['def'] == 'D'
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: data['VarObj']['base']['printable'] == 'D'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dag d = (ExampleDagOp 22, "hello":$foo);
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: data['VarObj']['d']['kind'] == 'dag'
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: data['VarObj']['d']['operator']['kind'] == 'def'
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: data['VarObj']['d']['operator']['def'] == 'ExampleDagOp'
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: data['VarObj']['d']['operator']['printable'] == 'ExampleDagOp'
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: data['VarObj']['d']['args'] == [[22, None], ["hello", "foo"]]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: data['VarObj']['d']['printable'] == '(ExampleDagOp 22, "hello":$foo)'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int undef_int;
|
|
|
|
field int ref_int = undef_int;
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: data['VarObj']['ref_int']['kind'] == 'var'
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: data['VarObj']['ref_int']['var'] == 'undef_int'
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: data['VarObj']['ref_int']['printable'] == 'undef_int'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
bits<2> undef_bits;
|
|
|
|
bits<4> ref_bits;
|
|
|
|
let ref_bits{3-2} = 0b10;
|
|
|
|
let ref_bits{1-0} = undef_bits{1-0};
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: data['VarObj']['ref_bits'][3] == 1
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: data['VarObj']['ref_bits'][2] == 0
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: data['VarObj']['ref_bits'][1]['kind'] == 'varbit'
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: data['VarObj']['ref_bits'][1]['var'] == 'undef_bits'
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: data['VarObj']['ref_bits'][1]['index'] == 1
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: data['VarObj']['ref_bits'][1]['printable'] == 'undef_bits{1}'
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: data['VarObj']['ref_bits'][0]['kind'] == 'varbit'
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: data['VarObj']['ref_bits'][0]['var'] == 'undef_bits'
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: data['VarObj']['ref_bits'][0]['index'] == 0
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: data['VarObj']['ref_bits'][0]['printable'] == 'undef_bits{0}'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
field int complex_ref_int = !add(undef_int, 2);
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: data['VarObj']['complex_ref_int']['kind'] == 'complex'
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: data['VarObj']['complex_ref_int']['printable'] == '!add(undef_int, 2)'
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Test the !anonymous member. This is tricky because when a def is
|
|
|
|
// anonymous, almost by definition, the test can't reliably predict
|
|
|
|
// the name it will be stored under! So we have to search all the defs
|
|
|
|
// in the JSON output looking for the one that has the test integer
|
|
|
|
// field set to the right value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def Named { int AnonTestField = 1; }
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: data['Named']['AnonTestField'] == 1
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: data['Named']['!anonymous'] is False
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def { int AnonTestField = 2; }
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: next(rec for rec in data.values() if isinstance(rec, dict) and rec.get('AnonTestField') == 2)['!anonymous'] is True
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
multiclass AnonTestMulticlass<int base> {
|
|
|
|
def _plus_one { int AnonTestField = !add(base,1); }
|
|
|
|
def { int AnonTestField = !add(base,2); }
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
defm NamedDefm : AnonTestMulticlass<10>;
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: data['NamedDefm_plus_one']['!anonymous'] is False
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: data['NamedDefm_plus_one']['AnonTestField'] == 11
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: next(rec for rec in data.values() if isinstance(rec, dict) and rec.get('AnonTestField') == 12)['!anonymous'] is True
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// D47431 clarifies that a named def inside a multiclass gives a
|
|
|
|
// *non*-anonymous output record, even if the defm that instantiates
|
|
|
|
// that multiclass is anonymous.
|
|
|
|
defm : AnonTestMulticlass<20>;
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: next(rec for rec in data.values() if isinstance(rec, dict) and rec.get('AnonTestField') == 21)['!anonymous'] is False
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: next(rec for rec in data.values() if isinstance(rec, dict) and rec.get('AnonTestField') == 22)['!anonymous'] is True
|