2022-04-07 18:03:55 +08:00
|
|
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -no-opaque-pointers -emit-llvm %s -o - -triple x86_64-linux-gnu | FileCheck %s
|
|
|
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -no-opaque-pointers -fsanitize=alignment -fno-sanitize-recover=alignment -emit-llvm %s -o - -triple x86_64-linux-gnu | FileCheck %s -implicit-check-not="call void @__ubsan_handle_alignment_assumption" --check-prefixes=CHECK,CHECK-SANITIZE,CHECK-SANITIZE-ANYRECOVER,CHECK-SANITIZE-NORECOVER,CHECK-SANITIZE-UNREACHABLE
|
|
|
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -no-opaque-pointers -fsanitize=alignment -fsanitize-recover=alignment -emit-llvm %s -o - -triple x86_64-linux-gnu | FileCheck %s -implicit-check-not="call void @__ubsan_handle_alignment_assumption" --check-prefixes=CHECK,CHECK-SANITIZE,CHECK-SANITIZE-ANYRECOVER,CHECK-SANITIZE-RECOVER
|
|
|
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -no-opaque-pointers -fsanitize=alignment -fsanitize-trap=alignment -emit-llvm %s -o - -triple x86_64-linux-gnu | FileCheck %s -implicit-check-not="call void @__ubsan_handle_alignment_assumption" --check-prefixes=CHECK,CHECK-SANITIZE,CHECK-SANITIZE-TRAP,CHECK-SANITIZE-UNREACHABLE
|
[clang][UBSan] Sanitization for alignment assumptions.
Summary:
UB isn't nice. It's cool and powerful, but not nice.
Having a way to detect it is nice though.
[[ https://wg21.link/p1007r3 | P1007R3: std::assume_aligned ]] / http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1007r2.pdf says:
```
We propose to add this functionality via a library function instead of a core language attribute.
...
If the pointer passed in is not aligned to at least N bytes, calling assume_aligned results in undefined behaviour.
```
This differential teaches clang to sanitize all the various variants of this assume-aligned attribute.
Requires D54588 for LLVM IRBuilder changes.
The compiler-rt part is D54590.
This is a second commit, the original one was r351105,
which was mass-reverted in r351159 because 2 compiler-rt tests were failing.
Reviewers: ABataev, craig.topper, vsk, rsmith, rnk, #sanitizers, erichkeane, filcab, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: chandlerc, ldionne, EricWF, mclow.lists, cfe-commits, bkramer
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54589
llvm-svn: 351177
2019-01-15 17:44:25 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2021-10-07 02:20:44 +08:00
|
|
|
typedef char **__attribute__((align_value(0x100000000))) aligned_char;
|
[clang][UBSan] Sanitization for alignment assumptions.
Summary:
UB isn't nice. It's cool and powerful, but not nice.
Having a way to detect it is nice though.
[[ https://wg21.link/p1007r3 | P1007R3: std::assume_aligned ]] / http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1007r2.pdf says:
```
We propose to add this functionality via a library function instead of a core language attribute.
...
If the pointer passed in is not aligned to at least N bytes, calling assume_aligned results in undefined behaviour.
```
This differential teaches clang to sanitize all the various variants of this assume-aligned attribute.
Requires D54588 for LLVM IRBuilder changes.
The compiler-rt part is D54590.
This is a second commit, the original one was r351105,
which was mass-reverted in r351159 because 2 compiler-rt tests were failing.
Reviewers: ABataev, craig.topper, vsk, rsmith, rnk, #sanitizers, erichkeane, filcab, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: chandlerc, ldionne, EricWF, mclow.lists, cfe-commits, bkramer
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54589
llvm-svn: 351177
2019-01-15 17:44:25 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct ac_struct {
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: %[[STRUCT_AC_STRUCT:.*]] = type { i8** }
|
|
|
|
aligned_char a;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-SANITIZE-ANYRECOVER: @[[ALIGNED_CHAR:.*]] = {{.*}} c"'aligned_char' (aka 'char **')\00" }
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-SANITIZE-ANYRECOVER: @[[LINE_100_ALIGNMENT_ASSUMPTION:.*]] = {{.*}}, i32 100, i32 13 }, {{.*}}* @[[ALIGNED_CHAR]] }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
char **load_from_ac_struct(struct ac_struct *x) {
|
2022-01-16 17:53:11 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK: define{{.*}} i8** @{{.*}}(%[[STRUCT_AC_STRUCT]]* noundef %[[X:.*]])
|
[clang][UBSan] Sanitization for alignment assumptions.
Summary:
UB isn't nice. It's cool and powerful, but not nice.
Having a way to detect it is nice though.
[[ https://wg21.link/p1007r3 | P1007R3: std::assume_aligned ]] / http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1007r2.pdf says:
```
We propose to add this functionality via a library function instead of a core language attribute.
...
If the pointer passed in is not aligned to at least N bytes, calling assume_aligned results in undefined behaviour.
```
This differential teaches clang to sanitize all the various variants of this assume-aligned attribute.
Requires D54588 for LLVM IRBuilder changes.
The compiler-rt part is D54590.
This is a second commit, the original one was r351105,
which was mass-reverted in r351159 because 2 compiler-rt tests were failing.
Reviewers: ABataev, craig.topper, vsk, rsmith, rnk, #sanitizers, erichkeane, filcab, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: chandlerc, ldionne, EricWF, mclow.lists, cfe-commits, bkramer
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54589
llvm-svn: 351177
2019-01-15 17:44:25 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: [[ENTRY:.*]]:
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: %[[STRUCT_AC_STRUCT_ADDR:.*]] = alloca %[[STRUCT_AC_STRUCT]]*, align 8
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: store %[[STRUCT_AC_STRUCT]]* %[[X]], %[[STRUCT_AC_STRUCT]]** %[[STRUCT_AC_STRUCT_ADDR]], align 8
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: %[[X_RELOADED:.*]] = load %[[STRUCT_AC_STRUCT]]*, %[[STRUCT_AC_STRUCT]]** %[[STRUCT_AC_STRUCT_ADDR]], align 8
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: %[[A_ADDR:.*]] = getelementptr inbounds %[[STRUCT_AC_STRUCT]], %[[STRUCT_AC_STRUCT]]* %[[X_RELOADED]], i32 0, i32 0
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: %[[A:.*]] = load i8**, i8*** %[[A_ADDR]], align 8
|
2020-09-12 19:36:45 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-SANITIZE-NEXT: %[[PTRINT:.*]] = ptrtoint i8** %[[A]] to i64
|
2021-10-07 02:20:44 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-SANITIZE-NEXT: %[[MASKEDPTR:.*]] = and i64 %[[PTRINT]], 4294967295
|
2020-09-12 19:36:45 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-SANITIZE-NEXT: %[[MASKCOND:.*]] = icmp eq i64 %[[MASKEDPTR]], 0
|
[clang][UBSan] Sanitization for alignment assumptions.
Summary:
UB isn't nice. It's cool and powerful, but not nice.
Having a way to detect it is nice though.
[[ https://wg21.link/p1007r3 | P1007R3: std::assume_aligned ]] / http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1007r2.pdf says:
```
We propose to add this functionality via a library function instead of a core language attribute.
...
If the pointer passed in is not aligned to at least N bytes, calling assume_aligned results in undefined behaviour.
```
This differential teaches clang to sanitize all the various variants of this assume-aligned attribute.
Requires D54588 for LLVM IRBuilder changes.
The compiler-rt part is D54590.
This is a second commit, the original one was r351105,
which was mass-reverted in r351159 because 2 compiler-rt tests were failing.
Reviewers: ABataev, craig.topper, vsk, rsmith, rnk, #sanitizers, erichkeane, filcab, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: chandlerc, ldionne, EricWF, mclow.lists, cfe-commits, bkramer
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54589
llvm-svn: 351177
2019-01-15 17:44:25 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-SANITIZE-NEXT: %[[PTRINT_DUP:.*]] = ptrtoint i8** %[[A]] to i64, !nosanitize
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-SANITIZE-NEXT: br i1 %[[MASKCOND]], label %[[CONT:.*]], label %[[HANDLER_ALIGNMENT_ASSUMPTION:[^,]+]],{{.*}} !nosanitize
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-SANITIZE: [[HANDLER_ALIGNMENT_ASSUMPTION]]:
|
2021-10-07 02:20:44 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-SANITIZE-NORECOVER-NEXT: call void @__ubsan_handle_alignment_assumption_abort(i8* bitcast ({ {{{.*}}}, {{{.*}}}, {{{.*}}}* }* @[[LINE_100_ALIGNMENT_ASSUMPTION]] to i8*), i64 %[[PTRINT_DUP]], i64 4294967296, i64 0){{.*}}, !nosanitize
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-SANITIZE-RECOVER-NEXT: call void @__ubsan_handle_alignment_assumption(i8* bitcast ({ {{{.*}}}, {{{.*}}}, {{{.*}}}* }* @[[LINE_100_ALIGNMENT_ASSUMPTION]] to i8*), i64 %[[PTRINT_DUP]], i64 4294967296, i64 0){{.*}}, !nosanitize
|
2020-10-21 17:11:25 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-SANITIZE-TRAP-NEXT: call void @llvm.ubsantrap(i8 23){{.*}}, !nosanitize
|
[clang][UBSan] Sanitization for alignment assumptions.
Summary:
UB isn't nice. It's cool and powerful, but not nice.
Having a way to detect it is nice though.
[[ https://wg21.link/p1007r3 | P1007R3: std::assume_aligned ]] / http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1007r2.pdf says:
```
We propose to add this functionality via a library function instead of a core language attribute.
...
If the pointer passed in is not aligned to at least N bytes, calling assume_aligned results in undefined behaviour.
```
This differential teaches clang to sanitize all the various variants of this assume-aligned attribute.
Requires D54588 for LLVM IRBuilder changes.
The compiler-rt part is D54590.
This is a second commit, the original one was r351105,
which was mass-reverted in r351159 because 2 compiler-rt tests were failing.
Reviewers: ABataev, craig.topper, vsk, rsmith, rnk, #sanitizers, erichkeane, filcab, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: chandlerc, ldionne, EricWF, mclow.lists, cfe-commits, bkramer
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54589
llvm-svn: 351177
2019-01-15 17:44:25 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-SANITIZE-UNREACHABLE-NEXT: unreachable, !nosanitize
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-SANITIZE: [[CONT]]:
|
2021-10-07 02:20:44 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: call void @llvm.assume(i1 true) [ "align"(i8** %[[A]], i64 4294967296) ]
|
[clang][UBSan] Sanitization for alignment assumptions.
Summary:
UB isn't nice. It's cool and powerful, but not nice.
Having a way to detect it is nice though.
[[ https://wg21.link/p1007r3 | P1007R3: std::assume_aligned ]] / http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2018/p1007r2.pdf says:
```
We propose to add this functionality via a library function instead of a core language attribute.
...
If the pointer passed in is not aligned to at least N bytes, calling assume_aligned results in undefined behaviour.
```
This differential teaches clang to sanitize all the various variants of this assume-aligned attribute.
Requires D54588 for LLVM IRBuilder changes.
The compiler-rt part is D54590.
This is a second commit, the original one was r351105,
which was mass-reverted in r351159 because 2 compiler-rt tests were failing.
Reviewers: ABataev, craig.topper, vsk, rsmith, rnk, #sanitizers, erichkeane, filcab, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: chandlerc, ldionne, EricWF, mclow.lists, cfe-commits, bkramer
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54589
llvm-svn: 351177
2019-01-15 17:44:25 +08:00
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: ret i8** %[[A]]
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: }
|
|
|
|
#line 100
|
|
|
|
return x->a;
|
|
|
|
}
|