llvm-project/clang/test/CodeGenCoroutines/coro-gro-nrvo.cpp

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

88 lines
2.6 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -fcoroutines-ts -std=c++14 -emit-llvm %s -o - -disable-llvm-passes | FileCheck %s
#include "Inputs/coroutine.h"
using namespace std::experimental;
namespace std {
struct nothrow_t {};
constexpr nothrow_t nothrow = {};
} // end namespace std
// Required when get_return_object_on_allocation_failure() is defined by
// the promise.
void* operator new(__SIZE_TYPE__ __sz, const std::nothrow_t&) noexcept;
void operator delete(void* __p, const std::nothrow_t&) noexcept;
template <class RetObject>
struct promise_type {
RetObject get_return_object();
suspend_always initial_suspend();
suspend_never final_suspend() noexcept;
void return_void();
static void unhandled_exception();
};
struct coro {
using promise_type = promise_type<coro>;
coro(coro const&);
struct Impl;
Impl *impl;
};
// Verify that the NRVO is applied to the Gro object.
// CHECK-LABEL: define void @_Z1fi(%struct.coro* noalias sret align 8 %agg.result, i32 %0)
coro f(int) {
[clang] Annotating C++'s `operator new` with more attributes Summary: Right now we annotate C++'s `operator new` with `noalias` attribute, which very much is healthy for optimizations. However as per [[ http://eel.is/c++draft/basic.stc.dynamic.allocation | `[basic.stc.dynamic.allocation]` ]], there are more promises on global `operator new`, namely: * non-`std::nothrow_t` `operator new` *never* returns `nullptr` * If `std::align_val_t align` parameter is taken, the pointer will also be `align`-aligned * ~~global `operator new`-returned pointer is `__STDCPP_DEFAULT_NEW_ALIGNMENT__`-aligned ~~ It's more caveated than that. Supplying this information may not cause immediate landslide effects on any specific benchmarks, but it for sure will be healthy for optimizer in the sense that the IR will better reflect the guarantees provided in the source code. The caveat is `-fno-assume-sane-operator-new`, which currently prevents emitting `noalias` attribute, and is automatically passed by Sanitizers ([[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16386 | PR16386 ]]) - should it also cover these attributes? The problem is that the flag is back-end-specific, as seen in `test/Modules/explicit-build-flags.cpp`. But while it is okay to add `noalias` metadata in backend, we really should be adding at least the alignment metadata to the AST, since that allows us to perform sema checks on it. Reviewers: erichkeane, rjmccall, jdoerfert, eugenis, rsmith Reviewed By: rsmith Subscribers: xbolva00, jrtc27, atanasyan, nlopes, cfe-commits Tags: #llvm, #clang Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73380
2020-02-26 06:37:17 +08:00
// CHECK: %call = call noalias nonnull i8* @_Znwm(
// CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[CoroInit:.*]]
// CHECK: {{.*}}[[CoroInit]]:
// CHECK: store i1 false, i1* %gro.active
// CHECK: call void @{{.*get_return_objectEv}}(%struct.coro* sret align 8 %agg.result
// CHECK-NEXT: store i1 true, i1* %gro.active
co_return;
}
template <class RetObject>
struct promise_type_with_on_alloc_failure {
static RetObject get_return_object_on_allocation_failure();
RetObject get_return_object();
suspend_always initial_suspend();
suspend_never final_suspend() noexcept;
void return_void();
static void unhandled_exception();
};
struct coro_two {
using promise_type = promise_type_with_on_alloc_failure<coro_two>;
coro_two(coro_two const&);
struct Impl;
Impl *impl;
};
// Verify that the NRVO is applied to the Gro object.
// CHECK-LABEL: define void @_Z1hi(%struct.coro_two* noalias sret align 8 %agg.result, i32 %0)
coro_two h(int) {
[clang] Annotating C++'s `operator new` with more attributes Summary: Right now we annotate C++'s `operator new` with `noalias` attribute, which very much is healthy for optimizations. However as per [[ http://eel.is/c++draft/basic.stc.dynamic.allocation | `[basic.stc.dynamic.allocation]` ]], there are more promises on global `operator new`, namely: * non-`std::nothrow_t` `operator new` *never* returns `nullptr` * If `std::align_val_t align` parameter is taken, the pointer will also be `align`-aligned * ~~global `operator new`-returned pointer is `__STDCPP_DEFAULT_NEW_ALIGNMENT__`-aligned ~~ It's more caveated than that. Supplying this information may not cause immediate landslide effects on any specific benchmarks, but it for sure will be healthy for optimizer in the sense that the IR will better reflect the guarantees provided in the source code. The caveat is `-fno-assume-sane-operator-new`, which currently prevents emitting `noalias` attribute, and is automatically passed by Sanitizers ([[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16386 | PR16386 ]]) - should it also cover these attributes? The problem is that the flag is back-end-specific, as seen in `test/Modules/explicit-build-flags.cpp`. But while it is okay to add `noalias` metadata in backend, we really should be adding at least the alignment metadata to the AST, since that allows us to perform sema checks on it. Reviewers: erichkeane, rjmccall, jdoerfert, eugenis, rsmith Reviewed By: rsmith Subscribers: xbolva00, jrtc27, atanasyan, nlopes, cfe-commits Tags: #llvm, #clang Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73380
2020-02-26 06:37:17 +08:00
// CHECK: %call = call noalias i8* @_ZnwmRKSt9nothrow_t
// CHECK-NEXT: %[[CheckNull:.*]] = icmp ne i8* %call, null
// CHECK-NEXT: br i1 %[[CheckNull]], label %[[InitOnSuccess:.*]], label %[[InitOnFailure:.*]]
// CHECK: {{.*}}[[InitOnFailure]]:
// CHECK-NEXT: call void @{{.*get_return_object_on_allocation_failureEv}}(%struct.coro_two* sret align 8 %agg.result
// CHECK-NEXT: br label %[[RetLabel:.*]]
// CHECK: {{.*}}[[InitOnSuccess]]:
// CHECK: store i1 false, i1* %gro.active
// CHECK: call void @{{.*get_return_objectEv}}(%struct.coro_two* sret align 8 %agg.result
// CHECK-NEXT: store i1 true, i1* %gro.active
// CHECK: [[RetLabel]]:
// CHECK-NEXT: ret void
co_return;
}