2010-06-17 08:34:59 +08:00
|
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
//
|
2019-01-19 18:56:40 +08:00
|
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
2010-06-17 08:34:59 +08:00
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// <regex>
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// template <class charT> struct regex_traits;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// int value(charT ch, int radix) const;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <regex>
|
2010-06-22 05:01:43 +08:00
|
|
|
#include <cassert>
|
2016-04-27 00:24:44 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "test_macros.h"
|
2010-06-17 08:34:59 +08:00
|
|
|
|
Support tests in freestanding
Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".
Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:
In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:
self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']
Run the tests and they all fail.
Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).
Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.
The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.
The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:
https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed
This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.
Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.
<rdar://problem/47754795>
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624
llvm-svn: 353086
2019-02-05 04:31:13 +08:00
|
|
|
int main(int, char**)
|
2010-06-17 08:34:59 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
2010-06-22 05:01:43 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
std::regex_traits<char> t;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (char c = 0; c < '0'; ++c)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 8) == -1);
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 10) == -1);
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 16) == -1);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (char c = '0'; c < '8'; ++c)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 8) == c - '0');
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 10) == c - '0');
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 16) == c - '0');
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (char c = '8'; c < ':'; ++c)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 8) == -1);
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 10) == c - '0');
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 16) == c - '0');
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (char c = ':'; c < 'A'; ++c)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 8) == -1);
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 10) == -1);
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 16) == -1);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (char c = 'A'; c < 'G'; ++c)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 8) == -1);
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 10) == -1);
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 16) == c - 'A' +10);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (char c = 'G'; c < 'a'; ++c)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 8) == -1);
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 10) == -1);
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 16) == -1);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (char c = 'a'; c < 'g'; ++c)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 8) == -1);
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 10) == -1);
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 16) == c - 'a' +10);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (int c = 'g'; c < 256; ++c)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(char(c), 8) == -1);
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(char(c), 10) == -1);
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(char(c), 16) == -1);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
std::regex_traits<wchar_t> t;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (wchar_t c = 0; c < '0'; ++c)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 8) == -1);
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 10) == -1);
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 16) == -1);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (wchar_t c = '0'; c < '8'; ++c)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2016-12-24 11:09:00 +08:00
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 8) == static_cast<int>(c - '0'));
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 10) == static_cast<int>(c - '0'));
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 16) == static_cast<int>(c - '0'));
|
2010-06-22 05:01:43 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (wchar_t c = '8'; c < ':'; ++c)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 8) == -1);
|
2016-12-24 11:09:00 +08:00
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 10) == static_cast<int>(c - '0'));
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 16) == static_cast<int>(c - '0'));
|
2010-06-22 05:01:43 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (wchar_t c = ':'; c < 'A'; ++c)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 8) == -1);
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 10) == -1);
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 16) == -1);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (wchar_t c = 'A'; c < 'G'; ++c)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 8) == -1);
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 10) == -1);
|
2016-12-24 11:09:00 +08:00
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 16) == static_cast<int>(c - 'A' +10));
|
2010-06-22 05:01:43 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (wchar_t c = 'G'; c < 'a'; ++c)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 8) == -1);
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 10) == -1);
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 16) == -1);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
for (wchar_t c = 'a'; c < 'g'; ++c)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 8) == -1);
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 10) == -1);
|
2016-12-24 11:09:00 +08:00
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 16) == static_cast<int>(c - 'a' +10));
|
2010-06-22 05:01:43 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
[libcxx] [test] Fix MSVC warning C4244 "conversion from 'X' to 'Y', possible loss of data", part 7/7.
test/std/input.output/iostream.format/input.streams/istream.unformatted/get.pass.cpp
Add static_cast<char> because basic_istream::get() returns int_type (N4606 27.7.2.3 [istream.unformatted]/4).
test/std/input.output/iostream.format/output.streams/ostream.formatted/ostream.inserters.arithmetic/minus1.pass.cpp
Add static_cast<char> because toupper() returns int (C11 7.4.2.2/1).
test/std/iterators/stream.iterators/ostream.iterator/ostream.iterator.ops/assign_t.pass.cpp
This test is intentionally writing doubles to ostream_iterator<int>.
It's silencing -Wliteral-conversion for Clang, so I'm adding C4244 silencing for MSVC.
test/std/language.support/support.limits/limits/numeric.limits.members/infinity.pass.cpp
Given `extern float zero;`, the expression `1./zero` has type double, which emits a truncation warning
when being passed to test<float>() taking float. The fix is to say `1.f/zero` which has type float.
test/std/numerics/complex.number/cmplx.over/arg.pass.cpp
test/std/numerics/complex.number/cmplx.over/norm.pass.cpp
These tests were constructing std::complex<double>(x, 0), emitting truncation warnings when x is long long.
Saying static_cast<double>(x) avoids this.
test/std/numerics/rand/rand.eng/rand.eng.lcong/seed_result_type.pass.cpp
This was using `int s` to construct and seed a linear_congruential_engine<T, stuff>, where T is
unsigned short/unsigned int/unsigned long/unsigned long long. That emits a truncation warning in the
unsigned short case. Because the range [0, 20) is tiny and we aren't doing anything else with the index,
we can just iterate with `T s`.
test/std/re/re.traits/value.pass.cpp
regex_traits<wchar_t>::value()'s first parameter is wchar_t (N4606 28.7 [re.traits]/13). This loop is
using int to iterate through ['g', 0xFFFF), emitting a truncation warning from int to wchar_t
(which is 16-bit for some of us). Because the bound is exclusive, we can just iterate with wchar_t.
test/std/strings/basic.string/string.cons/size_char_alloc.pass.cpp
This test is a little strange. It's trying to verify that basic_string's (InIt, InIt) range constructor
isn't confused by "N copies of C" when N and C have the same integral type. To do this, it was
testing (100, 65), but that eventually emits truncation warnings from int to char. There's a simple way
to avoid this - passing (static_cast<char>(100), static_cast<char>(65)) also exercises the disambiguation.
(And 100 is representable even when char has a signed range.)
test/std/strings/string.view/string.view.hash/string_view.pass.cpp
Add static_cast<char_type> because `'0' + i` has type int.
test/std/utilities/function.objects/bind/func.bind/func.bind.bind/nested.pass.cpp
What's more horrible than nested bind()? pow() overloads! This operator()(T a, T b) was assuming that
std::pow(a, b) can be returned as T. (In this case, T is int.) However, N4606 26.9.1 [cmath.syn]/2
says that pow(int, int) returns double, so this was truncating double to int.
Adding static_cast<T> silences this.
test/std/utilities/function.objects/unord.hash/integral.pass.cpp
This was iterating `for (int i = 0; i <= 5; ++i)` and constructing `T t(i);` but that's truncating
when T is short. (And super truncating when T is bool.) Adding static_cast<T> silences this.
test/std/utilities/utility/exchange/exchange.pass.cpp
First, this was exchanging 67.2 into an int, but that's inherently truncating.
Changing this to static_cast<short>(67) avoids the truncation while preserving the
"what if T and U are different" test coverage.
Second, this was exchanging {} with the explicit type float into an int, and that's also
inherently truncating. Specifying short is just as good.
test/std/utilities/utility/pairs/pairs.spec/make_pair.pass.cpp
Add static_cast<short>. Note that this affects template argument deduction for make_pair(),
better fulfilling the test's intent. For example, this was saying
`typedef std::pair<int, short> P1; P1 p1 = std::make_pair(3, 4);` but that was asking
make_pair() to return pair<int, int>, which was then being converted to pair<int, short>.
(pair's converting constructors are tested elsewhere.)
Now, std::make_pair(3, static_cast<short>(4)) actually returns pair<int, short>.
(There's still a conversion from pair<nullptr_t, short> to pair<unique_ptr<int>, short>.)
Fixes D27544.
llvm-svn: 289111
2016-12-09 05:38:57 +08:00
|
|
|
for (wchar_t c = 'g'; c < 0xFFFF; ++c)
|
2010-06-22 05:01:43 +08:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 8) == -1);
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 10) == -1);
|
|
|
|
assert(t.value(c, 16) == -1);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
Support tests in freestanding
Summary:
Freestanding is *weird*. The standard allows it to differ in a bunch of odd
manners from regular C++, and the committee would like to improve that
situation. I'd like to make libc++ behave better with what freestanding should
be, so that it can be a tool we use in improving the standard. To do that we
need to try stuff out, both with "freestanding the language mode" and
"freestanding the library subset".
Let's start with the super basic: run the libc++ tests in freestanding, using
clang as the compiler, and see what works. The easiest hack to do this:
In utils/libcxx/test/config.py add:
self.cxx.compile_flags += ['-ffreestanding']
Run the tests and they all fail.
Why? Because in freestanding `main` isn't special. This "not special" property
has two effects: main doesn't get mangled, and main isn't allowed to omit its
`return` statement. The first means main gets mangled and the linker can't
create a valid executable for us to test. The second means we spew out warnings
(ew) and the compiler doesn't insert the `return` we omitted, and main just
falls of the end and does whatever undefined behavior (if you're luck, ud2
leading to non-zero return code).
Let's start my work with the basics. This patch changes all libc++ tests to
declare `main` as `int main(int, char**` so it mangles consistently (enabling us
to declare another `extern "C"` main for freestanding which calls the mangled
one), and adds `return 0;` to all places where it was missing. This touches 6124
files, and I apologize.
The former was done with The Magic Of Sed.
The later was done with a (not quite correct but decent) clang tool:
https://gist.github.com/jfbastien/793819ff360baa845483dde81170feed
This works for most tests, though I did have to adjust a few places when e.g.
the test runs with `-x c`, macros are used for main (such as for the filesystem
tests), etc.
Once this is in we can create a freestanding bot which will prevent further
regressions. After that, we can start the real work of supporting C++
freestanding fairly well in libc++.
<rdar://problem/47754795>
Reviewers: ldionne, mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, arphaman, miyuki, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57624
llvm-svn: 353086
2019-02-05 04:31:13 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
2010-06-17 08:34:59 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|