maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/inheriting-constructor.cpp

411 lines
21 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -triple i386-linux -emit-llvm -o - %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK --check-prefix=ITANIUM
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -triple x86_64-darwin -emit-llvm -o - %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK --check-prefix=ITANIUM
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -triple arm64-ehabi -emit-llvm -o - %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK --check-prefix=ITANIUM
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -triple i386-windows -emit-llvm -o - %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK --check-prefix=MSABI --check-prefix=WIN32
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -triple x86_64-windows -emit-llvm -o - %s | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK --check-prefix=MSABI --check-prefix=WIN64
Make sure the accessors for overridden methods don't return inherited constructors. Fixes PR12219. llvm-svn: 152470
2012-03-10 09:39:01 +08:00
// PR12219
struct A { A(int); virtual ~A(); };
struct B : A { using A::A; ~B(); };
B::~B() {}
Bring inheriting constructor implementation up-to-date with current defect reports, and implement implicit definition of inheriting constructors. Remaining missing features: inheriting constructor templates, implicit exception specifications for inheriting constructors, inheriting constructors from dependent bases. llvm-svn: 177320
2013-03-19 05:12:30 +08:00
B b(123);
C++11 inheriting constructors: support for inheriting constructor templates. llvm-svn: 179151
2013-04-10 13:48:59 +08:00
struct C { template<typename T> C(T); };
struct D : C { using C::C; };
D d(123);
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// ITANIUM-LABEL: define void @_ZN1BD2Ev
// ITANIUM-LABEL: define void @_ZN1BD1Ev
// ITANIUM-LABEL: define void @_ZN1BD0Ev
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// WIN32-LABEL: define {{.*}}void @"??1B@@UAE@XZ"
// WIN64-LABEL: define {{.*}}void @"??1B@@UEAA@XZ"
Bring inheriting constructor implementation up-to-date with current defect reports, and implement implicit definition of inheriting constructors. Remaining missing features: inheriting constructor templates, implicit exception specifications for inheriting constructors, inheriting constructors from dependent bases. llvm-svn: 177320
2013-03-19 05:12:30 +08:00
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// ITANIUM-LABEL: define linkonce_odr void @_ZN1BCI11AEi(
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1BCI21AEi(
Bring inheriting constructor implementation up-to-date with current defect reports, and implement implicit definition of inheriting constructors. Remaining missing features: inheriting constructor templates, implicit exception specifications for inheriting constructors, inheriting constructors from dependent bases. llvm-svn: 177320
2013-03-19 05:12:30 +08:00
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// ITANIUM-LABEL: define linkonce_odr void @_ZN1DCI11CIiEET_(
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1DCI21CIiEET_(
C++11 inheriting constructors: support for inheriting constructor templates. llvm-svn: 179151
2013-04-10 13:48:59 +08:00
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// WIN32-LABEL: define internal {{.*}} @"??0B@@QAE@H@Z"(
// WIN32: call {{.*}} @"??0A@@QAE@H@Z"(
// WIN64-LABEL: define internal {{.*}} @"??0B@@QEAA@H@Z"(
// WIN64: call {{.*}} @"??0A@@QEAA@H@Z"(
Emit DeferredDeclsToEmit in a DFS order. Currently we emit DeferredDeclsToEmit in reverse order. This patch changes that. The advantages of the change are that * The output order is a bit closer to the source order. The change to test/CodeGenCXX/pod-member-memcpys.cpp is a good example. * If we decide to deffer more, it will not cause as large changes in the estcases as it would without this patch. llvm-svn: 226751
2015-01-22 08:24:57 +08:00
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// WIN32-LABEL: define internal {{.*}} @"??0D@@QAE@H@Z"(
// WIN32: call {{.*}} @"??$?0H@C@@QAE@H@Z"
// WIN64-LABEL: define internal {{.*}} @"??0D@@QEAA@H@Z"(
// WIN64: call {{.*}} @"??$?0H@C@@QEAA@H@Z"
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
struct Q { Q(int); Q(const Q&); ~Q(); };
struct Z { Z(); Z(int); ~Z(); int n; };
namespace noninline_nonvirt {
struct A { A(int, Q&&, void *__attribute__((pass_object_size(0)))); int n; };
struct B : Z, A { Z z; using A::A; };
B b(1, 2, &b);
// ITANIUM-LABEL: define {{.*}} @__cxx_global_var_init
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1QC1Ei({{.*}} %[[TMP:.*]], i32 2)
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN17noninline_nonvirt1BCI1NS_1AEEiO1QPvU17pass_object_size0({{.*}} @_ZN17noninline_nonvirt1bE, i32 1, {{.*}} %[[TMP]], i8* {{.*}} @_ZN17noninline_nonvirt1bE{{.*}}, i{{32|64}} 12)
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1QD1Ev({{.*}} %[[TMP]])
// ITANIUM: call i32 @__cxa_atexit(
// Complete object ctor for B delegates to base object ctor.
// ITANIUM-LABEL: define linkonce_odr void @_ZN17noninline_nonvirt1BCI1NS_1AEEiO1QPvU17pass_object_size0(
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN17noninline_nonvirt1BCI2NS_1AEEiO1QPvU17pass_object_size0({{.*}}, i32 {{.*}}, %{{.*}}* {{.*}}, i8* {{.*}}, i{{32|64}} {{.*}})
// In MSABI, we don't have ctor variants. B ctor forwards to A ctor.
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// MSABI-LABEL: define internal {{.*}} @"??0B@noninline_nonvirt@@Q{{AE|EAA}}@H$$Q{{E?}}AUQ@@P{{E?}}AXW4__pass_object_size0@__clang@@@Z"(%{{.*}}, i32{{.*}}, %{{.*}}, i8*{{.*}}, i{{32|64}}{{.*}})
// MSABI: call {{.*}} @"??0Z@@Q{{AE|EAA}}@XZ"(
// MSABI: call {{.*}} @"??0A@noninline_nonvirt@@Q{{AE|EAA}}@H$$Q{{E?}}AUQ@@P{{E?}}AXW4__pass_object_size0@__clang@@@Z"(%{{.*}}, i32{{.*}}, %{{.*}}, i8*{{.*}}, i{{32|64}}{{.*}})
// MSABI: call {{.*}} @"??0Z@@Q{{AE|EAA}}@XZ"(
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
struct C : B { using B::B; };
C c(1, 2, &c);
// Complete object ctor for C delegates.
// ITANIUM-LABEL: define linkonce_odr void @_ZN17noninline_nonvirt1CCI1NS_1AEEiO1QPvU17pass_object_size0(
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN17noninline_nonvirt1CCI2NS_1AEEiO1QPvU17pass_object_size0({{.*}}, i32 {{.*}}, %{{.*}}* {{.*}}, i8* {{.*}}, i{{32|64}} {{.*}})
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// MSABI-LABEL: define internal {{.*}} @"??0C@noninline_nonvirt@@Q{{AE|EAA}}@H$$Q{{E?}}AUQ@@P{{E?}}AXW4__pass_object_size0@__clang@@@Z"(%{{.*}}, i32{{.*}}, %{{.*}}, i8*{{.*}}, i{{32|64}}{{.*}})
// MSABI: call {{.*}} @"??0B@noninline_nonvirt@@Q{{AE|EAA}}@H$$Q{{E?}}AUQ@@P{{E?}}AXW4__pass_object_size0@__clang@@@Z"(%{{.*}}, i32{{.*}}, %{{.*}}, i8*{{.*}}, i{{32|64}}{{.*}})
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
}
namespace noninline_virt {
struct A { A(int, Q&&, void *__attribute__((pass_object_size(0)))); int n; };
struct B : Z, virtual A { Z z; using A::A; };
B b(1, 2, &b);
// Complete object ctor forwards to A ctor then constructs Zs.
// ITANIUM-LABEL: define linkonce_odr void @_ZN14noninline_virt1BCI1NS_1AEEiO1QPvU17pass_object_size0(
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN14noninline_virt1AC2EiO1QPvU17pass_object_size0({{.*}} %{{.*}}, i32 %{{.*}}, %{{.*}}* {{.*}}, i8* {{.*}}, i{{32|64}} %{{.*}}
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1ZC2Ev(
// ITANIUM: store {{.*}} @_ZTVN14noninline_virt1BE
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1ZC1Ev(
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// MSABI-LABEL: define internal {{.*}} @"??0B@noninline_virt@@Q{{AE|EAA}}@H$$Q{{E?}}AUQ@@P{{E?}}AXW4__pass_object_size0@__clang@@@Z"(%{{.*}}, i32{{.*}}, %{{.*}}, i8*{{.*}}, i{{32|64}}{{.*}}, i32 %{{.*}})
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// MSABI: %[[COMPLETE:.*]] = icmp ne
// MSABI: br i1 %[[COMPLETE]],
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// MSABI: call {{.*}} @"??0A@noninline_virt@@Q{{AE|EAA}}@H$$Q{{E?}}AUQ@@P{{E?}}AXW4__pass_object_size0@__clang@@@Z"(%{{.*}}, i32{{.*}}, %{{.*}}, i8*{{.*}}, i{{32|64}}{{.*}})
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// MSABI: br
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// MSABI: call {{.*}} @"??0Z@@Q{{AE|EAA}}@XZ"(
// MSABI: call {{.*}} @"??0Z@@Q{{AE|EAA}}@XZ"(
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
struct C : B { using B::B; };
C c(1, 2, &c);
// Complete object ctor forwards to A ctor, then calls B's base inheriting
// constructor, which takes no arguments other than the this pointer and VTT.
// ITANIUM_LABEL: define linkonce_odr void @_ZN14noninline_virt1CCI1NS_1AEEiO1QPvU17pass_object_size0(
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN14noninline_virt1AC2EiO1QPvU17pass_object_size0({{.*}} %{{.*}}, i32 %{{.*}}, %{{.*}}* {{.*}}, i8* %{{.*}}, i{{32|64}} %{{.*}})
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN14noninline_virt1BCI2NS_1AEEiO1QPvU17pass_object_size0(%{{.*}}* %{{.*}}, i8** getelementptr inbounds ([2 x i8*], [2 x i8*]* @_ZTTN14noninline_virt1CE, i64 0, i64 1))
// ITANIUM: store {{.*}} @_ZTVN14noninline_virt1CE
// C constructor forwards to B constructor and A constructor. We pass the args
// to both. FIXME: Can we pass undef here instead, for the base object
// constructor call?
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// MSABI-LABEL: define internal {{.*}} @"??0C@noninline_virt@@Q{{AE|EAA}}@H$$Q{{E?}}AUQ@@P{{E?}}AXW4__pass_object_size0@__clang@@@Z"(%{{.*}}, i32{{.*}}, %{{.*}}, i8*{{.*}}, i{{32|64}}{{.*}}, i32 %{{.*}})
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// MSABI: %[[COMPLETE:.*]] = icmp ne
// MSABI: br i1 %[[COMPLETE]],
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// MSABI: call {{.*}} @"??0A@noninline_virt@@Q{{AE|EAA}}@H$$Q{{E?}}AUQ@@P{{E?}}AXW4__pass_object_size0@__clang@@@Z"(%{{.*}}, i32{{.*}}, %{{.*}}, i8*{{.*}}, i{{32|64}}{{.*}})
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// MSABI: br
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// MSABI: call {{.*}} @"??0B@noninline_virt@@Q{{AE|EAA}}@H$$Q{{E?}}AUQ@@P{{E?}}AXW4__pass_object_size0@__clang@@@Z"(%{{.*}}, i32{{.*}}, %{{.*}}, i8*{{.*}}, i{{32|64}}{{.*}}, i32 0)
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
}
// For MSABI only, check that inalloca arguments result in inlining.
namespace inalloca_nonvirt {
struct A { A(Q, int, Q, Q&&); int n; };
struct B : Z, A { Z z; using A::A; };
B b(1, 2, 3, 4);
// No inlining implied for Itanium.
// ITANIUM-LABEL: define linkonce_odr void @_ZN16inalloca_nonvirt1BCI1NS_1AEE1QiS1_OS1_(
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN16inalloca_nonvirt1BCI2NS_1AEE1QiS1_OS1_(
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// MSABI-LABEL: define internal void @"??__Eb@inalloca_nonvirt@@YAXXZ"(
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// On Win32, the inalloca call can't be forwarded so we force inlining.
// WIN32: %[[TMP:.*]] = alloca
// WIN32: call i8* @llvm.stacksave()
// WIN32: %[[ARGMEM:.*]] = alloca inalloca
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// WIN32: call {{.*}} @"??0Q@@QAE@H@Z"(%{{.*}}* %[[TMP]], i32 4)
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// WIN32: %[[ARG3:.*]] = getelementptr {{.*}} %[[ARGMEM]]
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// WIN32: call {{.*}} @"??0Q@@QAE@H@Z"({{.*}}* %[[ARG3]], i32 3)
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// WIN32: %[[ARG1:.*]] = getelementptr {{.*}} %[[ARGMEM]]
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// WIN32: call {{.*}} @"??0Q@@QAE@H@Z"({{.*}}* %[[ARG1]], i32 1)
// WIN32: call {{.*}} @"??0Z@@QAE@XZ"(
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// WIN32: %[[ARG2:.*]] = getelementptr {{.*}} %[[ARGMEM]]
// WIN32: store i32 2, i32* %[[ARG2]]
// WIN32: %[[ARG4:.*]] = getelementptr {{.*}} %[[ARGMEM]]
// WIN32: store {{.*}}* %[[TMP]], {{.*}}** %[[ARG4]]
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// WIN32: call {{.*}} @"??0A@inalloca_nonvirt@@QAE@UQ@@H0$$QAU2@@Z"(%{{[^,]*}}, <{{.*}}>* inalloca %[[ARGMEM]])
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// WIN32: call void @llvm.stackrestore(
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// WIN32: call {{.*}} @"??0Z@@QAE@XZ"(
// WIN32: call {{.*}} @"??1Q@@QAE@XZ"(
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// On Win64, the Q arguments would be destroyed in the callee. We don't yet
// support that in the non-inlined case, so we force inlining.
// WIN64: %[[TMP:.*]] = alloca
// WIN64: %[[ARG3:.*]] = alloca
// WIN64: %[[ARG1:.*]] = alloca
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// WIN64: call {{.*}} @"??0Q@@QEAA@H@Z"({{.*}}* %[[TMP]], i32 4)
// WIN64: call {{.*}} @"??0Q@@QEAA@H@Z"({{.*}}* %[[ARG3]], i32 3)
// WIN64: call {{.*}} @"??0Q@@QEAA@H@Z"({{.*}}* %[[ARG1]], i32 1)
// WIN64: call {{.*}} @"??0Z@@QEAA@XZ"(
// WIN64: call {{.*}} @"??0A@inalloca_nonvirt@@QEAA@UQ@@H0$$QEAU2@@Z"(%{{.*}}, %{{.*}}* %[[ARG1]], i32 2, %{{.*}}* %[[ARG3]], %{{.*}} %[[TMP]])
// WIN64: call {{.*}} @"??0Z@@QEAA@XZ"(
// WIN64: call void @"??1Q@@QEAA@XZ"({{.*}}* %[[TMP]])
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
struct C : B { using B::B; };
C c(1, 2, 3, 4);
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// MSABI-LABEL: define internal void @"??__Ec@inalloca_nonvirt@@YAXXZ"(
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// On Win32, the inalloca call can't be forwarded so we force inlining.
// WIN32: %[[TMP:.*]] = alloca
// WIN32: call i8* @llvm.stacksave()
// WIN32: %[[ARGMEM:.*]] = alloca inalloca
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// WIN32: call {{.*}} @"??0Q@@QAE@H@Z"(%{{.*}}* %[[TMP]], i32 4)
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// WIN32: %[[ARG3:.*]] = getelementptr {{.*}} %[[ARGMEM]]
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// WIN32: call {{.*}} @"??0Q@@QAE@H@Z"({{.*}}* %[[ARG3]], i32 3)
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// WIN32: %[[ARG1:.*]] = getelementptr {{.*}} %[[ARGMEM]]
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// WIN32: call {{.*}} @"??0Q@@QAE@H@Z"({{.*}}* %[[ARG1]], i32 1)
// WIN32: call {{.*}} @"??0Z@@QAE@XZ"(
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// WIN32: %[[ARG2:.*]] = getelementptr {{.*}} %[[ARGMEM]]
// WIN32: store i32 2, i32* %[[ARG2]]
// WIN32: %[[ARG4:.*]] = getelementptr {{.*}} %[[ARGMEM]]
// WIN32: store {{.*}}* %[[TMP]], {{.*}}** %[[ARG4]]
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// WIN32: call {{.*}} @"??0A@inalloca_nonvirt@@QAE@UQ@@H0$$QAU2@@Z"(%{{[^,]*}}, <{{.*}}>* inalloca %[[ARGMEM]])
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// WIN32: call void @llvm.stackrestore(
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// WIN32: call {{.*}} @"??0Z@@QAE@XZ"(
// WIN32: call {{.*}} @"??1Q@@QAE@XZ"(
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// On Win64, the Q arguments would be destroyed in the callee. We don't yet
// support that in the non-inlined case, so we force inlining.
// WIN64: %[[TMP:.*]] = alloca
// WIN64: %[[ARG3:.*]] = alloca
// WIN64: %[[ARG1:.*]] = alloca
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// WIN64: call {{.*}} @"??0Q@@QEAA@H@Z"({{.*}}* %[[TMP]], i32 4)
// WIN64: call {{.*}} @"??0Q@@QEAA@H@Z"({{.*}}* %[[ARG3]], i32 3)
// WIN64: call {{.*}} @"??0Q@@QEAA@H@Z"({{.*}}* %[[ARG1]], i32 1)
// WIN64: call {{.*}} @"??0Z@@QEAA@XZ"(
// WIN64: call {{.*}} @"??0A@inalloca_nonvirt@@QEAA@UQ@@H0$$QEAU2@@Z"(%{{.*}}, %{{.*}}* %[[ARG1]], i32 2, %{{.*}}* %[[ARG3]], %{{.*}} %[[TMP]])
// WIN64: call {{.*}} @"??0Z@@QEAA@XZ"(
// WIN64: call void @"??1Q@@QEAA@XZ"({{.*}}* %[[TMP]])
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
}
namespace inalloca_virt {
struct A { A(Q, int, Q, Q&&); int n; };
struct B : Z, virtual A { Z z; using A::A; };
B b(1, 2, 3, 4);
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// MSABI-LABEL: define internal void @"??__Eb@inalloca_virt@@YAXXZ"(
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// On Win32, the inalloca call can't be forwarded so we force inlining.
// WIN32: %[[TMP:.*]] = alloca
// WIN32: call i8* @llvm.stacksave()
// WIN32: %[[ARGMEM:.*]] = alloca inalloca
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// WIN32: call {{.*}} @"??0Q@@QAE@H@Z"(%{{.*}}* %[[TMP]], i32 4)
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// WIN32: %[[ARG3:.*]] = getelementptr {{.*}} %[[ARGMEM]]
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// WIN32: call {{.*}} @"??0Q@@QAE@H@Z"({{.*}}* %[[ARG3]], i32 3)
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// WIN32: %[[ARG1:.*]] = getelementptr {{.*}} %[[ARGMEM]]
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// WIN32: call {{.*}} @"??0Q@@QAE@H@Z"({{.*}}* %[[ARG1]], i32 1)
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// FIXME: It's dumb to round-trip this though memory and generate a branch.
// WIN32: store i32 1, i32* %[[IS_MOST_DERIVED_ADDR:.*]]
// WIN32: %[[IS_MOST_DERIVED:.*]] = load i32, i32* %[[IS_MOST_DERIVED_ADDR]]
// WIN32: %[[IS_MOST_DERIVED_i1:.*]] = icmp ne i32 %[[IS_MOST_DERIVED]], 0
// WIN32: br i1 %[[IS_MOST_DERIVED_i1]]
//
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// WIN32: store {{.*}} @"??_8B@inalloca_virt@@7B@"
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// WIN32: %[[ARG2:.*]] = getelementptr {{.*}} %[[ARGMEM]]
// WIN32: store i32 2, i32* %[[ARG2]]
// WIN32: %[[ARG4:.*]] = getelementptr {{.*}} %[[ARGMEM]]
// WIN32: store {{.*}}* %[[TMP]], {{.*}}** %[[ARG4]]
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// WIN32: call {{.*}} @"??0A@inalloca_virt@@QAE@UQ@@H0$$QAU2@@Z"(%{{[^,]*}}, <{{.*}}>* inalloca %[[ARGMEM]])
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// WIN32: call void @llvm.stackrestore(
// WIN32: br
//
// Note that if we jumped directly to here we would fail to stackrestore and
// destroy the parameters, but that's not actually possible.
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// WIN32: call {{.*}} @"??0Z@@QAE@XZ"(
// WIN32: call {{.*}} @"??0Z@@QAE@XZ"(
// WIN32: call {{.*}} @"??1Q@@QAE@XZ"(
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// On Win64, the Q arguments would be destroyed in the callee. We don't yet
// support that in the non-inlined case, so we force inlining.
// WIN64: %[[TMP:.*]] = alloca
// WIN64: %[[ARG3:.*]] = alloca
// WIN64: %[[ARG1:.*]] = alloca
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// WIN64: call {{.*}} @"??0Q@@QEAA@H@Z"({{.*}}* %[[TMP]], i32 4)
// WIN64: call {{.*}} @"??0Q@@QEAA@H@Z"({{.*}}* %[[ARG3]], i32 3)
// WIN64: call {{.*}} @"??0Q@@QEAA@H@Z"({{.*}}* %[[ARG1]], i32 1)
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// WIN64: br i1
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// WIN64: call {{.*}} @"??0A@inalloca_virt@@QEAA@UQ@@H0$$QEAU2@@Z"(%{{.*}}, %{{.*}}* %[[ARG1]], i32 2, %{{.*}}* %[[ARG3]], %{{.*}} %[[TMP]])
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// WIN64: br
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// WIN64: call {{.*}} @"??0Z@@QEAA@XZ"(
// WIN64: call {{.*}} @"??0Z@@QEAA@XZ"(
// WIN64: call void @"??1Q@@QEAA@XZ"({{.*}}* %[[TMP]])
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
struct C : B { using B::B; };
C c(1, 2, 3, 4);
// ITANIUM-LABEL: define linkonce_odr void @_ZN13inalloca_virt1CD1Ev(
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// MSABI-LABEL: define internal void @"??__Ec@inalloca_virt@@YAXXZ"(
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// On Win32, the inalloca call can't be forwarded so we force inlining.
// WIN32: %[[TMP:.*]] = alloca
// WIN32: call i8* @llvm.stacksave()
// WIN32: %[[ARGMEM:.*]] = alloca inalloca
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// WIN32: call {{.*}} @"??0Q@@QAE@H@Z"(%{{.*}}* %[[TMP]], i32 4)
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// WIN32: %[[ARG3:.*]] = getelementptr {{.*}} %[[ARGMEM]]
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// WIN32: call {{.*}} @"??0Q@@QAE@H@Z"({{.*}}* %[[ARG3]], i32 3)
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// WIN32: %[[ARG1:.*]] = getelementptr {{.*}} %[[ARGMEM]]
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// WIN32: call {{.*}} @"??0Q@@QAE@H@Z"({{.*}}* %[[ARG1]], i32 1)
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// WIN32: store i32 1, i32* %[[IS_MOST_DERIVED_ADDR:.*]]
// WIN32: %[[IS_MOST_DERIVED:.*]] = load i32, i32* %[[IS_MOST_DERIVED_ADDR]]
// WIN32: %[[IS_MOST_DERIVED_i1:.*]] = icmp ne i32 %[[IS_MOST_DERIVED]], 0
// WIN32: br i1 %[[IS_MOST_DERIVED_i1]]
//
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// WIN32: store {{.*}} @"??_8C@inalloca_virt@@7B@"
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// WIN32: %[[ARG2:.*]] = getelementptr {{.*}} %[[ARGMEM]]
// WIN32: store i32 2, i32* %[[ARG2]]
// WIN32: %[[ARG4:.*]] = getelementptr {{.*}} %[[ARGMEM]]
// WIN32: store {{.*}}* %[[TMP]], {{.*}}** %[[ARG4]]
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// WIN32: call {{.*}} @"??0A@inalloca_virt@@QAE@UQ@@H0$$QAU2@@Z"(%{{[^,]*}}, <{{.*}}>* inalloca %[[ARGMEM]])
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// WIN32: call void @llvm.stackrestore(
// WIN32: br
//
// WIN32: store i32 0, i32* %[[IS_MOST_DERIVED_ADDR:.*]]
// WIN32: %[[IS_MOST_DERIVED:.*]] = load i32, i32* %[[IS_MOST_DERIVED_ADDR]]
// WIN32: %[[IS_MOST_DERIVED_i1:.*]] = icmp ne i32 %[[IS_MOST_DERIVED]], 0
// WIN32: br i1 %[[IS_MOST_DERIVED_i1]]
//
// Note: this block is unreachable.
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// WIN32: store {{.*}} @"??_8B@inalloca_virt@@7B@"
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// WIN32: br
//
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// WIN32: call {{.*}} @"??0Z@@QAE@XZ"(
// WIN32: call {{.*}} @"??0Z@@QAE@XZ"(
// WIN32: call {{.*}} @"??1Q@@QAE@XZ"(
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// On Win64, the Q arguments would be destroyed in the callee. We don't yet
// support that in the non-inlined case, so we force inlining.
// WIN64: %[[TMP:.*]] = alloca
// WIN64: %[[ARG3:.*]] = alloca
// WIN64: %[[ARG1:.*]] = alloca
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// WIN64: call {{.*}} @"??0Q@@QEAA@H@Z"({{.*}}* %[[TMP]], i32 4)
// WIN64: call {{.*}} @"??0Q@@QEAA@H@Z"({{.*}}* %[[ARG3]], i32 3)
// WIN64: call {{.*}} @"??0Q@@QEAA@H@Z"({{.*}}* %[[ARG1]], i32 1)
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// WIN64: br i1
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// WIN64: store {{.*}} @"??_8C@inalloca_virt@@7B@"
// WIN64: call {{.*}} @"??0A@inalloca_virt@@QEAA@UQ@@H0$$QEAU2@@Z"(%{{.*}}, %{{.*}}* %[[ARG1]], i32 2, %{{.*}}* %[[ARG3]], %{{.*}} %[[TMP]])
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// WIN64: br
// WIN64: br i1
// (Unreachable block)
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// WIN64: store {{.*}} @"??_8B@inalloca_virt@@7B@"
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// WIN64: br
[MS] Don't escape MS C++ names with \01 It is not needed after LLVM r327734. Now it will be easier to copy-paste IR symbol names from Clang. llvm-svn: 327738
2018-03-17 04:36:49 +08:00
// WIN64: call {{.*}} @"??0Z@@QEAA@XZ"(
// WIN64: call {{.*}} @"??0Z@@QEAA@XZ"(
// WIN64: call void @"??1Q@@QEAA@XZ"({{.*}}* %[[TMP]])
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
}
namespace inline_nonvirt {
struct A { A(Q, int, Q, Q&&, ...); int n; };
struct B : Z, A { Z z; using A::A; };
B b(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6);
// Inlined all the way down to the A ctor.
// ITANIUM-LABEL: define {{.*}} @__cxx_global_var_init
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1QC1Ei({{.*}}, i32 1)
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1QC1Ei({{.*}}, i32 3)
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1QC1Ei({{.*}}, i32 4)
// ITANIUM: %[[Z_BASE:.*]] = bitcast %{{.*}}* %[[THIS:.*]] to
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1ZC2Ev(
// ITANIUM: %[[B_CAST:.*]] = bitcast {{.*}} %[[THIS]]
// ITANIUM: %[[A_CAST:.*]] = getelementptr {{.*}} %[[B_CAST]], i{{32|64}} 4
// ITANIUM: %[[A:.*]] = bitcast {{.*}} %[[A_CAST]]
// ITANIUM: call void ({{.*}}, ...) @_ZN14inline_nonvirt1AC2E1QiS1_OS1_z(%{{.*}}* %[[A]], {{.*}}, i32 2, {{.*}}, {{.*}}, i32 5, i32 6)
// ITANIUM: %[[Z_MEMBER:.*]] = getelementptr {{.*}} %[[THIS]], i32 0, i32 2
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1ZC1Ev({{.*}} %[[Z_MEMBER]])
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1QD1Ev(
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1QD1Ev(
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1QD1Ev(
struct C : B { using B::B; };
C c(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6);
// Inlined all the way down to the A ctor.
// ITANIUM-LABEL: define {{.*}} @__cxx_global_var_init
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1QC1Ei({{.*}}, i32 1)
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1QC1Ei({{.*}}, i32 3)
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1QC1Ei({{.*}}, i32 4)
// ITANIUM: %[[Z_BASE:.*]] = bitcast %{{.*}}* %[[THIS:.*]] to
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1ZC2Ev(
// ITANIUM: %[[B_CAST:.*]] = bitcast {{.*}} %[[THIS]]
// ITANIUM: %[[A_CAST:.*]] = getelementptr {{.*}} %[[B_CAST]], i{{32|64}} 4
// ITANIUM: %[[A:.*]] = bitcast {{.*}} %[[A_CAST]]
// ITANIUM: call void ({{.*}}, ...) @_ZN14inline_nonvirt1AC2E1QiS1_OS1_z(%{{.*}}* %[[A]], {{.*}}, i32 2, {{.*}}, {{.*}}, i32 5, i32 6)
// ITANIUM: %[[Z_MEMBER:.*]] = getelementptr {{.*}} %{{.*}}, i32 0, i32 2
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1ZC1Ev({{.*}} %[[Z_MEMBER]])
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1QD1Ev(
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1QD1Ev(
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1QD1Ev(
}
namespace inline_virt {
struct A { A(Q, int, Q, Q&&, ...); int n; };
struct B : Z, virtual A { Z z; using A::A; };
B b(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6);
// Inlined all the way down to the A ctor.
// ITANIUM-LABEL: define {{.*}} @__cxx_global_var_init
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1QC1Ei({{.*}}, i32 1)
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1QC1Ei({{.*}}, i32 3)
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1QC1Ei({{.*}}, i32 4)
// ITANIUM: %[[B_CAST:.*]] = bitcast {{.*}} %[[THIS:.*]]
// ITANIUM: %[[A_CAST:.*]] = getelementptr {{.*}} %[[B_CAST]], i{{32|64}} {{12|16}}
// ITANIUM: %[[A:.*]] = bitcast {{.*}} %[[A_CAST]]
// ITANIUM: call void ({{.*}}, ...) @_ZN11inline_virt1AC2E1QiS1_OS1_z(%{{.*}}* %[[A]], {{.*}}, i32 2, {{.*}}, {{.*}}, i32 5, i32 6)
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1ZC2Ev(
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1ZC1Ev(
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1QD1Ev(
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1QD1Ev(
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1QD1Ev(
struct C : B { using B::B; };
C c(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6);
// Inlined all the way down to the A ctor, except that we can just call the
// B base inheriting constructor to construct that portion (it doesn't need
// the forwarded arguments).
// ITANIUM-LABEL: define {{.*}} @__cxx_global_var_init
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1QC1Ei({{.*}}, i32 1)
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1QC1Ei({{.*}}, i32 3)
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1QC1Ei({{.*}}, i32 4)
// ITANIUM: %[[B_CAST:.*]] = bitcast {{.*}} %[[THIS:.*]]
// ITANIUM: %[[A_CAST:.*]] = getelementptr {{.*}} %[[B_CAST]], i{{32|64}} {{12|16}}
// ITANIUM: %[[A:.*]] = bitcast {{.*}} %[[A_CAST]]
// ITANIUM: call void ({{.*}}, ...) @_ZN11inline_virt1AC2E1QiS1_OS1_z(%{{.*}}* %[[A]], {{.*}}, i32 2, {{.*}}, {{.*}}, i32 5, i32 6)
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN11inline_virt1BCI2NS_1AEE1QiS1_OS1_z({{[^,]*}}, i8** getelementptr inbounds ([2 x i8*], [2 x i8*]* @_ZTTN11inline_virt1CE, i64 0, i64 1))
// ITANIUM: store {{.*}} @_ZTVN11inline_virt1CE
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1QD1Ev(
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1QD1Ev(
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1QD1Ev(
// B base object inheriting constructor does not get passed arguments.
// ITANIUM-LABEL: define linkonce_odr void @_ZN11inline_virt1BCI2NS_1AEE1QiS1_OS1_z(
// ITANIUM-NOT: call
Fix unreasonably-precise CHECK. llvm-svn: 274050
2016-06-29 03:09:30 +08:00
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1ZC2Ev(
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// ITANIUM-NOT: call
// VTT -> vtable
// ITANIUM: store
// ITANIUM-NOT: call
Fix unreasonably-precise CHECK. llvm-svn: 274050
2016-06-29 03:09:30 +08:00
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1ZC1Ev(
P0136R1, DR1573, DR1645, DR1715, DR1736, DR1903, DR1941, DR1959, DR1991: Replace inheriting constructors implementation with new approach, voted into C++ last year as a DR against C++11. Instead of synthesizing a set of derived class constructors for each inherited base class constructor, we make the constructors of the base class visible to constructor lookup in the derived class, using the normal rules for using-declarations. For constructors, UsingShadowDecl now has a ConstructorUsingShadowDecl derived class that tracks the requisite additional information. We create shadow constructors (not found by name lookup) in the derived class to model the actual initialization, and have a new expression node, CXXInheritedCtorInitExpr, to model the initialization of a base class from such a constructor. (This initialization is special because it performs real perfect forwarding of arguments.) In cases where argument forwarding is not possible (for inalloca calls, variadic calls, and calls with callee parameter cleanup), the shadow inheriting constructor is not emitted and instead we directly emit the initialization code into the caller of the inherited constructor. Note that this new model is not perfectly compatible with the old model in some corner cases. In particular: * if B inherits a private constructor from A, and C uses that constructor to construct a B, then we previously required that A befriends B and B befriends C, but the new rules require A to befriend C directly, and * if a derived class has its own constructors (and so its implicit default constructor is suppressed), it may still inherit a default constructor from a base class llvm-svn: 274049
2016-06-29 03:03:57 +08:00
// ITANIUM-NOT: call
// ITANIUM: }
}
// ITANIUM-LABEL: define linkonce_odr void @_ZN1BCI21AEi(
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1AC2Ei(
// ITANIUM-LABEL: define linkonce_odr void @_ZN1DCI21CIiEET_(
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1CC2IiEET_(
// ITANIUM-LABEL: define linkonce_odr void @_ZN17noninline_nonvirt1BCI2NS_1AEEiO1QPvU17pass_object_size0(
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN1ZC2Ev(
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN17noninline_nonvirt1AC2EiO1QPvU17pass_object_size0(
// ITANIUM-LABEL: define linkonce_odr void @_ZN17noninline_nonvirt1CCI2NS_1AEEiO1QPvU17pass_object_size0(
// ITANIUM: call void @_ZN17noninline_nonvirt1BCI2NS_1AEEiO1QPvU17pass_object_size0(