llvm-project/lld/test/ELF/aarch64-fpic-adr_prel_pg_hi...

// REQUIRES: aarch64
// RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=aarch64-none-freebsd %s -o %t.o
// RUN: not ld.lld -shared %t.o -o %t.so 2>&1 | FileCheck %s
// CHECK: can't create dynamic relocation R_AARCH64_ADR_PREL_PG_HI21 against symbol dat

  adrp x0, dat
.data
.globl dat
dat:
  .word 0
[ELF/AArch64] Allow only valid dynamic relocations in the output. All relocations, which cannot be handled by the dynamic linker, cause a linking error "rebuild with -fPIC". Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15193 llvm-svn: 254840 2015-12-05 14:20:24 +08:00			`// REQUIRES: aarch64`
			`// RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=aarch64-none-freebsd %s -o %t.o`
			`// RUN: not ld.lld -shared %t.o -o %t.so 2>&1 \| FileCheck %s`
[ELF] Improve error reporting for relocations We should always include symbol name when reporting relocations error to simplify debugging of these issues. Without symbol names users have to manually investigate which of the libraries contain invalid relocations which can be cumbersome when linking multiple libraries. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23690 llvm-svn: 279162 2016-08-19 05:55:23 +08:00			`// CHECK: can't create dynamic relocation R_AARCH64_ADR_PREL_PG_HI21 against symbol dat`
[ELF/AArch64] Allow only valid dynamic relocations in the output. All relocations, which cannot be handled by the dynamic linker, cause a linking error "rebuild with -fPIC". Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15193 llvm-svn: 254840 2015-12-05 14:20:24 +08:00
			`adrp x0, dat`
			`.data`
			`.globl dat`
			`dat:`
			`.word 0`