llvm-project/llvm/lib/CodeGen/PeepholeOptimizer.cpp

2112 lines
78 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

//===- PeepholeOptimizer.cpp - Peephole Optimizations ---------------------===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// Perform peephole optimizations on the machine code:
//
// - Optimize Extensions
//
// Optimization of sign / zero extension instructions. It may be extended to
// handle other instructions with similar properties.
//
// On some targets, some instructions, e.g. X86 sign / zero extension, may
// leave the source value in the lower part of the result. This optimization
// will replace some uses of the pre-extension value with uses of the
// sub-register of the results.
//
// - Optimize Comparisons
//
// Optimization of comparison instructions. For instance, in this code:
//
// sub r1, 1
// cmp r1, 0
// bz L1
//
// If the "sub" instruction all ready sets (or could be modified to set) the
// same flag that the "cmp" instruction sets and that "bz" uses, then we can
// eliminate the "cmp" instruction.
//
// Another instance, in this code:
//
// sub r1, r3 | sub r1, imm
// cmp r3, r1 or cmp r1, r3 | cmp r1, imm
// bge L1
//
// If the branch instruction can use flag from "sub", then we can replace
// "sub" with "subs" and eliminate the "cmp" instruction.
//
// - Optimize Loads:
//
// Loads that can be folded into a later instruction. A load is foldable
2015-09-09 08:38:33 +08:00
// if it loads to virtual registers and the virtual register defined has
// a single use.
//
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
// - Optimize Copies and Bitcast (more generally, target specific copies):
//
// Rewrite copies and bitcasts to avoid cross register bank copies
// when possible.
// E.g., Consider the following example, where capital and lower
// letters denote different register file:
// b = copy A <-- cross-bank copy
// C = copy b <-- cross-bank copy
// =>
// b = copy A <-- cross-bank copy
// C = copy A <-- same-bank copy
//
// E.g., for bitcast:
// b = bitcast A <-- cross-bank copy
// C = bitcast b <-- cross-bank copy
// =>
// b = bitcast A <-- cross-bank copy
// C = copy A <-- same-bank copy
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "llvm/ADT/DenseMap.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/Optional.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallSet.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallVector.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineBasicBlock.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineDominators.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineFunction.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineFunctionPass.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineInstr.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineInstrBuilder.h"
Remove redundant copy in recurrences Summary: If there is a chain of instructions formulating a recurrence, commuting operands can help removing a redundant copy. In the following example code, ``` BB#1: ; Loop Header %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: ; Loop Latch %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg1<kill,tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1,%vreg0 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg2<kill,tied0>, %vreg10<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2,%vreg10 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> ``` Existing two-address generation pass generates following code: ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg1<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` This is suboptimal because the assembly code generated has a redundant copy at the end of #BB6 to feed %vreg13 to BB#1: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %esi, %edi addl %ebx, %edi cmpl $10, %edi movl %edi, %esi jl .LBB0_1 ``` This redundant copy can be elimiated by making instructions in the recurrence chain to compute the value "into" the register that actually holds the feedback value. In this example, this can be achieved by commuting %vreg0 and %vreg1 to compute %vreg10. With that change, code after two-address generation becomes ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: derived from LLVM BB %bb7 Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg0<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg1<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` and the final assembly does not have redundant copy: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %edi, %eax addl %ebx, %eax cmpl $10, %eax jl .LBB0_1 ``` Reviewers: qcolombet, MatzeB, wmi Reviewed By: wmi Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31821 llvm-svn: 306758
2017-06-30 07:11:24 +08:00
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineLoopInfo.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineOperand.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineRegisterInfo.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/TargetInstrInfo.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/TargetOpcodes.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/TargetRegisterInfo.h"
#include "llvm/CodeGen/TargetSubtargetInfo.h"
#include "llvm/MC/LaneBitmask.h"
#include "llvm/MC/MCInstrDesc.h"
#include "llvm/Pass.h"
#include "llvm/Support/CommandLine.h"
#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
#include "llvm/Support/ErrorHandling.h"
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
#include <cassert>
#include <cstdint>
#include <memory>
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
#include <utility>
using namespace llvm;
using RegSubRegPair = TargetInstrInfo::RegSubRegPair;
using RegSubRegPairAndIdx = TargetInstrInfo::RegSubRegPairAndIdx;
#define DEBUG_TYPE "peephole-opt"
// Optimize Extensions
static cl::opt<bool>
Aggressive("aggressive-ext-opt", cl::Hidden,
cl::desc("Aggressive extension optimization"));
static cl::opt<bool>
DisablePeephole("disable-peephole", cl::Hidden, cl::init(false),
cl::desc("Disable the peephole optimizer"));
/// Specifiy whether or not the value tracking looks through
/// complex instructions. When this is true, the value tracker
/// bails on everything that is not a copy or a bitcast.
static cl::opt<bool>
DisableAdvCopyOpt("disable-adv-copy-opt", cl::Hidden, cl::init(false),
cl::desc("Disable advanced copy optimization"));
CodeGen peephole: fold redundant phys reg copies Code generation often exposes redundant physical register copies through virtual registers such as: %vreg = COPY %PHYSREG ... %PHYSREG = COPY %vreg There are cases where no intervening clobber of %PHYSREG occurs, and the later copy could therefore be removed. In some cases this further allows us to remove the initial copy. This patch contains a motivating example which comes from the x86 build of Chrome, specifically cc::ResourceProvider::UnlockForRead uses libstdc++'s implementation of hash_map. That example has two tests live at the same time, and after machine sinking LLVM has confused itself enough and things spilling EFLAGS is a great idea even though it's never restored and the comparison results are both live. Before this patch we have: DEC32m %RIP, 1, %noreg, <ga:@L>, %noreg, %EFLAGS<imp-def> %vreg1<def> = COPY %EFLAGS; GR64:%vreg1 %EFLAGS<def> = COPY %vreg1; GR64:%vreg1 JNE_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use> Both copies are useless. This patch tries to eliminate the later copy in a generic manner. dec is especially confusing to LLVM when compared with sub. I wrote this patch to treat all physical registers generically, but only remove redundant copies of non-allocatable physical registers because the allocatable ones caused issues (e.g. when calling conventions weren't properly modeled) and should be handled later by the register allocator anyways. The following tests used to failed when the patch also replaced allocatable registers: CodeGen/X86/StackColoring.ll CodeGen/X86/avx512-calling-conv.ll CodeGen/X86/copy-propagation.ll CodeGen/X86/inline-asm-fpstack.ll CodeGen/X86/musttail-varargs.ll CodeGen/X86/pop-stack-cleanup.ll CodeGen/X86/preserve_mostcc64.ll CodeGen/X86/tailcallstack64.ll CodeGen/X86/this-return-64.ll This happens because COPY has other special meaning for e.g. dependency breakage and x87 FP stack. Note that all other backends' tests pass. Reviewers: qcolombet Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15157 llvm-svn: 254665
2015-12-04 07:43:56 +08:00
static cl::opt<bool> DisableNAPhysCopyOpt(
"disable-non-allocatable-phys-copy-opt", cl::Hidden, cl::init(false),
cl::desc("Disable non-allocatable physical register copy optimization"));
// Limit the number of PHI instructions to process
// in PeepholeOptimizer::getNextSource.
static cl::opt<unsigned> RewritePHILimit(
"rewrite-phi-limit", cl::Hidden, cl::init(10),
cl::desc("Limit the length of PHI chains to lookup"));
Remove redundant copy in recurrences Summary: If there is a chain of instructions formulating a recurrence, commuting operands can help removing a redundant copy. In the following example code, ``` BB#1: ; Loop Header %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: ; Loop Latch %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg1<kill,tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1,%vreg0 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg2<kill,tied0>, %vreg10<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2,%vreg10 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> ``` Existing two-address generation pass generates following code: ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg1<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` This is suboptimal because the assembly code generated has a redundant copy at the end of #BB6 to feed %vreg13 to BB#1: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %esi, %edi addl %ebx, %edi cmpl $10, %edi movl %edi, %esi jl .LBB0_1 ``` This redundant copy can be elimiated by making instructions in the recurrence chain to compute the value "into" the register that actually holds the feedback value. In this example, this can be achieved by commuting %vreg0 and %vreg1 to compute %vreg10. With that change, code after two-address generation becomes ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: derived from LLVM BB %bb7 Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg0<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg1<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` and the final assembly does not have redundant copy: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %edi, %eax addl %ebx, %eax cmpl $10, %eax jl .LBB0_1 ``` Reviewers: qcolombet, MatzeB, wmi Reviewed By: wmi Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31821 llvm-svn: 306758
2017-06-30 07:11:24 +08:00
// Limit the length of recurrence chain when evaluating the benefit of
// commuting operands.
static cl::opt<unsigned> MaxRecurrenceChain(
"recurrence-chain-limit", cl::Hidden, cl::init(3),
cl::desc("Maximum length of recurrence chain when evaluating the benefit "
"of commuting operands"));
STATISTIC(NumReuse, "Number of extension results reused");
STATISTIC(NumCmps, "Number of compares eliminated");
STATISTIC(NumImmFold, "Number of move immediate folded");
STATISTIC(NumLoadFold, "Number of loads folded");
STATISTIC(NumSelects, "Number of selects optimized");
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
STATISTIC(NumUncoalescableCopies, "Number of uncoalescable copies optimized");
STATISTIC(NumRewrittenCopies, "Number of copies rewritten");
CodeGen peephole: fold redundant phys reg copies Code generation often exposes redundant physical register copies through virtual registers such as: %vreg = COPY %PHYSREG ... %PHYSREG = COPY %vreg There are cases where no intervening clobber of %PHYSREG occurs, and the later copy could therefore be removed. In some cases this further allows us to remove the initial copy. This patch contains a motivating example which comes from the x86 build of Chrome, specifically cc::ResourceProvider::UnlockForRead uses libstdc++'s implementation of hash_map. That example has two tests live at the same time, and after machine sinking LLVM has confused itself enough and things spilling EFLAGS is a great idea even though it's never restored and the comparison results are both live. Before this patch we have: DEC32m %RIP, 1, %noreg, <ga:@L>, %noreg, %EFLAGS<imp-def> %vreg1<def> = COPY %EFLAGS; GR64:%vreg1 %EFLAGS<def> = COPY %vreg1; GR64:%vreg1 JNE_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use> Both copies are useless. This patch tries to eliminate the later copy in a generic manner. dec is especially confusing to LLVM when compared with sub. I wrote this patch to treat all physical registers generically, but only remove redundant copies of non-allocatable physical registers because the allocatable ones caused issues (e.g. when calling conventions weren't properly modeled) and should be handled later by the register allocator anyways. The following tests used to failed when the patch also replaced allocatable registers: CodeGen/X86/StackColoring.ll CodeGen/X86/avx512-calling-conv.ll CodeGen/X86/copy-propagation.ll CodeGen/X86/inline-asm-fpstack.ll CodeGen/X86/musttail-varargs.ll CodeGen/X86/pop-stack-cleanup.ll CodeGen/X86/preserve_mostcc64.ll CodeGen/X86/tailcallstack64.ll CodeGen/X86/this-return-64.ll This happens because COPY has other special meaning for e.g. dependency breakage and x87 FP stack. Note that all other backends' tests pass. Reviewers: qcolombet Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15157 llvm-svn: 254665
2015-12-04 07:43:56 +08:00
STATISTIC(NumNAPhysCopies, "Number of non-allocatable physical copies removed");
namespace {
class ValueTrackerResult;
Remove redundant copy in recurrences Summary: If there is a chain of instructions formulating a recurrence, commuting operands can help removing a redundant copy. In the following example code, ``` BB#1: ; Loop Header %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: ; Loop Latch %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg1<kill,tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1,%vreg0 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg2<kill,tied0>, %vreg10<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2,%vreg10 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> ``` Existing two-address generation pass generates following code: ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg1<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` This is suboptimal because the assembly code generated has a redundant copy at the end of #BB6 to feed %vreg13 to BB#1: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %esi, %edi addl %ebx, %edi cmpl $10, %edi movl %edi, %esi jl .LBB0_1 ``` This redundant copy can be elimiated by making instructions in the recurrence chain to compute the value "into" the register that actually holds the feedback value. In this example, this can be achieved by commuting %vreg0 and %vreg1 to compute %vreg10. With that change, code after two-address generation becomes ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: derived from LLVM BB %bb7 Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg0<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg1<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` and the final assembly does not have redundant copy: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %edi, %eax addl %ebx, %eax cmpl $10, %eax jl .LBB0_1 ``` Reviewers: qcolombet, MatzeB, wmi Reviewed By: wmi Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31821 llvm-svn: 306758
2017-06-30 07:11:24 +08:00
class RecurrenceInstr;
class PeepholeOptimizer : public MachineFunctionPass {
const TargetInstrInfo *TII;
const TargetRegisterInfo *TRI;
MachineRegisterInfo *MRI;
MachineDominatorTree *DT; // Machine dominator tree
MachineLoopInfo *MLI;
public:
static char ID; // Pass identification
PeepholeOptimizer() : MachineFunctionPass(ID) {
initializePeepholeOptimizerPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());
}
bool runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) override;
void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const override {
AU.setPreservesCFG();
MachineFunctionPass::getAnalysisUsage(AU);
Remove redundant copy in recurrences Summary: If there is a chain of instructions formulating a recurrence, commuting operands can help removing a redundant copy. In the following example code, ``` BB#1: ; Loop Header %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: ; Loop Latch %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg1<kill,tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1,%vreg0 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg2<kill,tied0>, %vreg10<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2,%vreg10 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> ``` Existing two-address generation pass generates following code: ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg1<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` This is suboptimal because the assembly code generated has a redundant copy at the end of #BB6 to feed %vreg13 to BB#1: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %esi, %edi addl %ebx, %edi cmpl $10, %edi movl %edi, %esi jl .LBB0_1 ``` This redundant copy can be elimiated by making instructions in the recurrence chain to compute the value "into" the register that actually holds the feedback value. In this example, this can be achieved by commuting %vreg0 and %vreg1 to compute %vreg10. With that change, code after two-address generation becomes ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: derived from LLVM BB %bb7 Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg0<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg1<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` and the final assembly does not have redundant copy: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %edi, %eax addl %ebx, %eax cmpl $10, %eax jl .LBB0_1 ``` Reviewers: qcolombet, MatzeB, wmi Reviewed By: wmi Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31821 llvm-svn: 306758
2017-06-30 07:11:24 +08:00
AU.addRequired<MachineLoopInfo>();
AU.addPreserved<MachineLoopInfo>();
if (Aggressive) {
AU.addRequired<MachineDominatorTree>();
AU.addPreserved<MachineDominatorTree>();
}
}
/// Track Def -> Use info used for rewriting copies.
using RewriteMapTy = SmallDenseMap<RegSubRegPair, ValueTrackerResult>;
/// Sequence of instructions that formulate recurrence cycle.
using RecurrenceCycle = SmallVector<RecurrenceInstr, 4>;
Remove redundant copy in recurrences Summary: If there is a chain of instructions formulating a recurrence, commuting operands can help removing a redundant copy. In the following example code, ``` BB#1: ; Loop Header %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: ; Loop Latch %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg1<kill,tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1,%vreg0 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg2<kill,tied0>, %vreg10<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2,%vreg10 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> ``` Existing two-address generation pass generates following code: ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg1<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` This is suboptimal because the assembly code generated has a redundant copy at the end of #BB6 to feed %vreg13 to BB#1: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %esi, %edi addl %ebx, %edi cmpl $10, %edi movl %edi, %esi jl .LBB0_1 ``` This redundant copy can be elimiated by making instructions in the recurrence chain to compute the value "into" the register that actually holds the feedback value. In this example, this can be achieved by commuting %vreg0 and %vreg1 to compute %vreg10. With that change, code after two-address generation becomes ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: derived from LLVM BB %bb7 Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg0<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg1<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` and the final assembly does not have redundant copy: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %edi, %eax addl %ebx, %eax cmpl $10, %eax jl .LBB0_1 ``` Reviewers: qcolombet, MatzeB, wmi Reviewed By: wmi Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31821 llvm-svn: 306758
2017-06-30 07:11:24 +08:00
private:
bool optimizeCmpInstr(MachineInstr &MI);
bool optimizeExtInstr(MachineInstr &MI, MachineBasicBlock &MBB,
SmallPtrSetImpl<MachineInstr*> &LocalMIs);
bool optimizeSelect(MachineInstr &MI,
SmallPtrSetImpl<MachineInstr *> &LocalMIs);
bool optimizeCondBranch(MachineInstr &MI);
bool optimizeCoalescableCopy(MachineInstr &MI);
bool optimizeUncoalescableCopy(MachineInstr &MI,
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
SmallPtrSetImpl<MachineInstr *> &LocalMIs);
Remove redundant copy in recurrences Summary: If there is a chain of instructions formulating a recurrence, commuting operands can help removing a redundant copy. In the following example code, ``` BB#1: ; Loop Header %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: ; Loop Latch %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg1<kill,tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1,%vreg0 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg2<kill,tied0>, %vreg10<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2,%vreg10 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> ``` Existing two-address generation pass generates following code: ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg1<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` This is suboptimal because the assembly code generated has a redundant copy at the end of #BB6 to feed %vreg13 to BB#1: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %esi, %edi addl %ebx, %edi cmpl $10, %edi movl %edi, %esi jl .LBB0_1 ``` This redundant copy can be elimiated by making instructions in the recurrence chain to compute the value "into" the register that actually holds the feedback value. In this example, this can be achieved by commuting %vreg0 and %vreg1 to compute %vreg10. With that change, code after two-address generation becomes ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: derived from LLVM BB %bb7 Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg0<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg1<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` and the final assembly does not have redundant copy: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %edi, %eax addl %ebx, %eax cmpl $10, %eax jl .LBB0_1 ``` Reviewers: qcolombet, MatzeB, wmi Reviewed By: wmi Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31821 llvm-svn: 306758
2017-06-30 07:11:24 +08:00
bool optimizeRecurrence(MachineInstr &PHI);
bool findNextSource(RegSubRegPair RegSubReg, RewriteMapTy &RewriteMap);
bool isMoveImmediate(MachineInstr &MI,
SmallSet<unsigned, 4> &ImmDefRegs,
DenseMap<unsigned, MachineInstr*> &ImmDefMIs);
bool foldImmediate(MachineInstr &MI, SmallSet<unsigned, 4> &ImmDefRegs,
DenseMap<unsigned, MachineInstr*> &ImmDefMIs);
/// Finds recurrence cycles, but only ones that formulated around
Remove redundant copy in recurrences Summary: If there is a chain of instructions formulating a recurrence, commuting operands can help removing a redundant copy. In the following example code, ``` BB#1: ; Loop Header %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: ; Loop Latch %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg1<kill,tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1,%vreg0 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg2<kill,tied0>, %vreg10<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2,%vreg10 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> ``` Existing two-address generation pass generates following code: ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg1<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` This is suboptimal because the assembly code generated has a redundant copy at the end of #BB6 to feed %vreg13 to BB#1: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %esi, %edi addl %ebx, %edi cmpl $10, %edi movl %edi, %esi jl .LBB0_1 ``` This redundant copy can be elimiated by making instructions in the recurrence chain to compute the value "into" the register that actually holds the feedback value. In this example, this can be achieved by commuting %vreg0 and %vreg1 to compute %vreg10. With that change, code after two-address generation becomes ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: derived from LLVM BB %bb7 Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg0<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg1<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` and the final assembly does not have redundant copy: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %edi, %eax addl %ebx, %eax cmpl $10, %eax jl .LBB0_1 ``` Reviewers: qcolombet, MatzeB, wmi Reviewed By: wmi Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31821 llvm-svn: 306758
2017-06-30 07:11:24 +08:00
/// a def operand and a use operand that are tied. If there is a use
/// operand commutable with the tied use operand, find recurrence cycle
/// along that operand as well.
bool findTargetRecurrence(unsigned Reg,
const SmallSet<unsigned, 2> &TargetReg,
RecurrenceCycle &RC);
/// If copy instruction \p MI is a virtual register copy, track it in
CodeGen peephole: fold redundant phys reg copies Code generation often exposes redundant physical register copies through virtual registers such as: %vreg = COPY %PHYSREG ... %PHYSREG = COPY %vreg There are cases where no intervening clobber of %PHYSREG occurs, and the later copy could therefore be removed. In some cases this further allows us to remove the initial copy. This patch contains a motivating example which comes from the x86 build of Chrome, specifically cc::ResourceProvider::UnlockForRead uses libstdc++'s implementation of hash_map. That example has two tests live at the same time, and after machine sinking LLVM has confused itself enough and things spilling EFLAGS is a great idea even though it's never restored and the comparison results are both live. Before this patch we have: DEC32m %RIP, 1, %noreg, <ga:@L>, %noreg, %EFLAGS<imp-def> %vreg1<def> = COPY %EFLAGS; GR64:%vreg1 %EFLAGS<def> = COPY %vreg1; GR64:%vreg1 JNE_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use> Both copies are useless. This patch tries to eliminate the later copy in a generic manner. dec is especially confusing to LLVM when compared with sub. I wrote this patch to treat all physical registers generically, but only remove redundant copies of non-allocatable physical registers because the allocatable ones caused issues (e.g. when calling conventions weren't properly modeled) and should be handled later by the register allocator anyways. The following tests used to failed when the patch also replaced allocatable registers: CodeGen/X86/StackColoring.ll CodeGen/X86/avx512-calling-conv.ll CodeGen/X86/copy-propagation.ll CodeGen/X86/inline-asm-fpstack.ll CodeGen/X86/musttail-varargs.ll CodeGen/X86/pop-stack-cleanup.ll CodeGen/X86/preserve_mostcc64.ll CodeGen/X86/tailcallstack64.ll CodeGen/X86/this-return-64.ll This happens because COPY has other special meaning for e.g. dependency breakage and x87 FP stack. Note that all other backends' tests pass. Reviewers: qcolombet Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15157 llvm-svn: 254665
2015-12-04 07:43:56 +08:00
/// the set \p CopySrcRegs and \p CopyMIs. If this virtual register was
/// previously seen as a copy, replace the uses of this copy with the
/// previously seen copy's destination register.
bool foldRedundantCopy(MachineInstr &MI,
CodeGen peephole: fold redundant phys reg copies Code generation often exposes redundant physical register copies through virtual registers such as: %vreg = COPY %PHYSREG ... %PHYSREG = COPY %vreg There are cases where no intervening clobber of %PHYSREG occurs, and the later copy could therefore be removed. In some cases this further allows us to remove the initial copy. This patch contains a motivating example which comes from the x86 build of Chrome, specifically cc::ResourceProvider::UnlockForRead uses libstdc++'s implementation of hash_map. That example has two tests live at the same time, and after machine sinking LLVM has confused itself enough and things spilling EFLAGS is a great idea even though it's never restored and the comparison results are both live. Before this patch we have: DEC32m %RIP, 1, %noreg, <ga:@L>, %noreg, %EFLAGS<imp-def> %vreg1<def> = COPY %EFLAGS; GR64:%vreg1 %EFLAGS<def> = COPY %vreg1; GR64:%vreg1 JNE_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use> Both copies are useless. This patch tries to eliminate the later copy in a generic manner. dec is especially confusing to LLVM when compared with sub. I wrote this patch to treat all physical registers generically, but only remove redundant copies of non-allocatable physical registers because the allocatable ones caused issues (e.g. when calling conventions weren't properly modeled) and should be handled later by the register allocator anyways. The following tests used to failed when the patch also replaced allocatable registers: CodeGen/X86/StackColoring.ll CodeGen/X86/avx512-calling-conv.ll CodeGen/X86/copy-propagation.ll CodeGen/X86/inline-asm-fpstack.ll CodeGen/X86/musttail-varargs.ll CodeGen/X86/pop-stack-cleanup.ll CodeGen/X86/preserve_mostcc64.ll CodeGen/X86/tailcallstack64.ll CodeGen/X86/this-return-64.ll This happens because COPY has other special meaning for e.g. dependency breakage and x87 FP stack. Note that all other backends' tests pass. Reviewers: qcolombet Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15157 llvm-svn: 254665
2015-12-04 07:43:56 +08:00
SmallSet<unsigned, 4> &CopySrcRegs,
DenseMap<unsigned, MachineInstr *> &CopyMIs);
/// Is the register \p Reg a non-allocatable physical register?
CodeGen peephole: fold redundant phys reg copies Code generation often exposes redundant physical register copies through virtual registers such as: %vreg = COPY %PHYSREG ... %PHYSREG = COPY %vreg There are cases where no intervening clobber of %PHYSREG occurs, and the later copy could therefore be removed. In some cases this further allows us to remove the initial copy. This patch contains a motivating example which comes from the x86 build of Chrome, specifically cc::ResourceProvider::UnlockForRead uses libstdc++'s implementation of hash_map. That example has two tests live at the same time, and after machine sinking LLVM has confused itself enough and things spilling EFLAGS is a great idea even though it's never restored and the comparison results are both live. Before this patch we have: DEC32m %RIP, 1, %noreg, <ga:@L>, %noreg, %EFLAGS<imp-def> %vreg1<def> = COPY %EFLAGS; GR64:%vreg1 %EFLAGS<def> = COPY %vreg1; GR64:%vreg1 JNE_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use> Both copies are useless. This patch tries to eliminate the later copy in a generic manner. dec is especially confusing to LLVM when compared with sub. I wrote this patch to treat all physical registers generically, but only remove redundant copies of non-allocatable physical registers because the allocatable ones caused issues (e.g. when calling conventions weren't properly modeled) and should be handled later by the register allocator anyways. The following tests used to failed when the patch also replaced allocatable registers: CodeGen/X86/StackColoring.ll CodeGen/X86/avx512-calling-conv.ll CodeGen/X86/copy-propagation.ll CodeGen/X86/inline-asm-fpstack.ll CodeGen/X86/musttail-varargs.ll CodeGen/X86/pop-stack-cleanup.ll CodeGen/X86/preserve_mostcc64.ll CodeGen/X86/tailcallstack64.ll CodeGen/X86/this-return-64.ll This happens because COPY has other special meaning for e.g. dependency breakage and x87 FP stack. Note that all other backends' tests pass. Reviewers: qcolombet Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15157 llvm-svn: 254665
2015-12-04 07:43:56 +08:00
bool isNAPhysCopy(unsigned Reg);
/// If copy instruction \p MI is a non-allocatable virtual<->physical
CodeGen peephole: fold redundant phys reg copies Code generation often exposes redundant physical register copies through virtual registers such as: %vreg = COPY %PHYSREG ... %PHYSREG = COPY %vreg There are cases where no intervening clobber of %PHYSREG occurs, and the later copy could therefore be removed. In some cases this further allows us to remove the initial copy. This patch contains a motivating example which comes from the x86 build of Chrome, specifically cc::ResourceProvider::UnlockForRead uses libstdc++'s implementation of hash_map. That example has two tests live at the same time, and after machine sinking LLVM has confused itself enough and things spilling EFLAGS is a great idea even though it's never restored and the comparison results are both live. Before this patch we have: DEC32m %RIP, 1, %noreg, <ga:@L>, %noreg, %EFLAGS<imp-def> %vreg1<def> = COPY %EFLAGS; GR64:%vreg1 %EFLAGS<def> = COPY %vreg1; GR64:%vreg1 JNE_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use> Both copies are useless. This patch tries to eliminate the later copy in a generic manner. dec is especially confusing to LLVM when compared with sub. I wrote this patch to treat all physical registers generically, but only remove redundant copies of non-allocatable physical registers because the allocatable ones caused issues (e.g. when calling conventions weren't properly modeled) and should be handled later by the register allocator anyways. The following tests used to failed when the patch also replaced allocatable registers: CodeGen/X86/StackColoring.ll CodeGen/X86/avx512-calling-conv.ll CodeGen/X86/copy-propagation.ll CodeGen/X86/inline-asm-fpstack.ll CodeGen/X86/musttail-varargs.ll CodeGen/X86/pop-stack-cleanup.ll CodeGen/X86/preserve_mostcc64.ll CodeGen/X86/tailcallstack64.ll CodeGen/X86/this-return-64.ll This happens because COPY has other special meaning for e.g. dependency breakage and x87 FP stack. Note that all other backends' tests pass. Reviewers: qcolombet Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15157 llvm-svn: 254665
2015-12-04 07:43:56 +08:00
/// register copy, track it in the \p NAPhysToVirtMIs map. If this
/// non-allocatable physical register was previously copied to a virtual
/// registered and hasn't been clobbered, the virt->phys copy can be
/// deleted.
bool foldRedundantNAPhysCopy(MachineInstr &MI,
CodeGen peephole: fold redundant phys reg copies Code generation often exposes redundant physical register copies through virtual registers such as: %vreg = COPY %PHYSREG ... %PHYSREG = COPY %vreg There are cases where no intervening clobber of %PHYSREG occurs, and the later copy could therefore be removed. In some cases this further allows us to remove the initial copy. This patch contains a motivating example which comes from the x86 build of Chrome, specifically cc::ResourceProvider::UnlockForRead uses libstdc++'s implementation of hash_map. That example has two tests live at the same time, and after machine sinking LLVM has confused itself enough and things spilling EFLAGS is a great idea even though it's never restored and the comparison results are both live. Before this patch we have: DEC32m %RIP, 1, %noreg, <ga:@L>, %noreg, %EFLAGS<imp-def> %vreg1<def> = COPY %EFLAGS; GR64:%vreg1 %EFLAGS<def> = COPY %vreg1; GR64:%vreg1 JNE_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use> Both copies are useless. This patch tries to eliminate the later copy in a generic manner. dec is especially confusing to LLVM when compared with sub. I wrote this patch to treat all physical registers generically, but only remove redundant copies of non-allocatable physical registers because the allocatable ones caused issues (e.g. when calling conventions weren't properly modeled) and should be handled later by the register allocator anyways. The following tests used to failed when the patch also replaced allocatable registers: CodeGen/X86/StackColoring.ll CodeGen/X86/avx512-calling-conv.ll CodeGen/X86/copy-propagation.ll CodeGen/X86/inline-asm-fpstack.ll CodeGen/X86/musttail-varargs.ll CodeGen/X86/pop-stack-cleanup.ll CodeGen/X86/preserve_mostcc64.ll CodeGen/X86/tailcallstack64.ll CodeGen/X86/this-return-64.ll This happens because COPY has other special meaning for e.g. dependency breakage and x87 FP stack. Note that all other backends' tests pass. Reviewers: qcolombet Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15157 llvm-svn: 254665
2015-12-04 07:43:56 +08:00
DenseMap<unsigned, MachineInstr *> &NAPhysToVirtMIs);
bool isLoadFoldable(MachineInstr &MI,
SmallSet<unsigned, 16> &FoldAsLoadDefCandidates);
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
/// Check whether \p MI is understood by the register coalescer
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
/// but may require some rewriting.
bool isCoalescableCopy(const MachineInstr &MI) {
// SubregToRegs are not interesting, because they are already register
// coalescer friendly.
return MI.isCopy() || (!DisableAdvCopyOpt &&
(MI.isRegSequence() || MI.isInsertSubreg() ||
MI.isExtractSubreg()));
}
/// Check whether \p MI is a copy like instruction that is
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
/// not recognized by the register coalescer.
bool isUncoalescableCopy(const MachineInstr &MI) {
return MI.isBitcast() ||
(!DisableAdvCopyOpt &&
(MI.isRegSequenceLike() || MI.isInsertSubregLike() ||
MI.isExtractSubregLike()));
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
}
MachineInstr &rewriteSource(MachineInstr &CopyLike,
RegSubRegPair Def, RewriteMapTy &RewriteMap);
};
/// Helper class to hold instructions that are inside recurrence cycles.
/// The recurrence cycle is formulated around 1) a def operand and its
Remove redundant copy in recurrences Summary: If there is a chain of instructions formulating a recurrence, commuting operands can help removing a redundant copy. In the following example code, ``` BB#1: ; Loop Header %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: ; Loop Latch %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg1<kill,tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1,%vreg0 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg2<kill,tied0>, %vreg10<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2,%vreg10 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> ``` Existing two-address generation pass generates following code: ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg1<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` This is suboptimal because the assembly code generated has a redundant copy at the end of #BB6 to feed %vreg13 to BB#1: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %esi, %edi addl %ebx, %edi cmpl $10, %edi movl %edi, %esi jl .LBB0_1 ``` This redundant copy can be elimiated by making instructions in the recurrence chain to compute the value "into" the register that actually holds the feedback value. In this example, this can be achieved by commuting %vreg0 and %vreg1 to compute %vreg10. With that change, code after two-address generation becomes ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: derived from LLVM BB %bb7 Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg0<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg1<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` and the final assembly does not have redundant copy: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %edi, %eax addl %ebx, %eax cmpl $10, %eax jl .LBB0_1 ``` Reviewers: qcolombet, MatzeB, wmi Reviewed By: wmi Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31821 llvm-svn: 306758
2017-06-30 07:11:24 +08:00
/// tied use operand, or 2) a def operand and a use operand that is commutable
/// with another use operand which is tied to the def operand. In the latter
/// case, index of the tied use operand and the commutable use operand are
/// maintained with CommutePair.
class RecurrenceInstr {
public:
using IndexPair = std::pair<unsigned, unsigned>;
Remove redundant copy in recurrences Summary: If there is a chain of instructions formulating a recurrence, commuting operands can help removing a redundant copy. In the following example code, ``` BB#1: ; Loop Header %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: ; Loop Latch %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg1<kill,tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1,%vreg0 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg2<kill,tied0>, %vreg10<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2,%vreg10 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> ``` Existing two-address generation pass generates following code: ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg1<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` This is suboptimal because the assembly code generated has a redundant copy at the end of #BB6 to feed %vreg13 to BB#1: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %esi, %edi addl %ebx, %edi cmpl $10, %edi movl %edi, %esi jl .LBB0_1 ``` This redundant copy can be elimiated by making instructions in the recurrence chain to compute the value "into" the register that actually holds the feedback value. In this example, this can be achieved by commuting %vreg0 and %vreg1 to compute %vreg10. With that change, code after two-address generation becomes ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: derived from LLVM BB %bb7 Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg0<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg1<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` and the final assembly does not have redundant copy: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %edi, %eax addl %ebx, %eax cmpl $10, %eax jl .LBB0_1 ``` Reviewers: qcolombet, MatzeB, wmi Reviewed By: wmi Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31821 llvm-svn: 306758
2017-06-30 07:11:24 +08:00
RecurrenceInstr(MachineInstr *MI) : MI(MI) {}
RecurrenceInstr(MachineInstr *MI, unsigned Idx1, unsigned Idx2)
: MI(MI), CommutePair(std::make_pair(Idx1, Idx2)) {}
MachineInstr *getMI() const { return MI; }
Optional<IndexPair> getCommutePair() const { return CommutePair; }
private:
MachineInstr *MI;
Optional<IndexPair> CommutePair;
};
/// Helper class to hold a reply for ValueTracker queries.
/// Contains the returned sources for a given search and the instructions
/// where the sources were tracked from.
class ValueTrackerResult {
private:
/// Track all sources found by one ValueTracker query.
SmallVector<RegSubRegPair, 2> RegSrcs;
/// Instruction using the sources in 'RegSrcs'.
const MachineInstr *Inst = nullptr;
public:
ValueTrackerResult() = default;
ValueTrackerResult(unsigned Reg, unsigned SubReg) {
addSource(Reg, SubReg);
}
bool isValid() const { return getNumSources() > 0; }
void setInst(const MachineInstr *I) { Inst = I; }
const MachineInstr *getInst() const { return Inst; }
void clear() {
RegSrcs.clear();
Inst = nullptr;
}
void addSource(unsigned SrcReg, unsigned SrcSubReg) {
RegSrcs.push_back(RegSubRegPair(SrcReg, SrcSubReg));
}
void setSource(int Idx, unsigned SrcReg, unsigned SrcSubReg) {
assert(Idx < getNumSources() && "Reg pair source out of index");
RegSrcs[Idx] = RegSubRegPair(SrcReg, SrcSubReg);
}
int getNumSources() const { return RegSrcs.size(); }
RegSubRegPair getSrc(int Idx) const {
return RegSrcs[Idx];
}
unsigned getSrcReg(int Idx) const {
assert(Idx < getNumSources() && "Reg source out of index");
return RegSrcs[Idx].Reg;
}
unsigned getSrcSubReg(int Idx) const {
assert(Idx < getNumSources() && "SubReg source out of index");
return RegSrcs[Idx].SubReg;
}
bool operator==(const ValueTrackerResult &Other) {
if (Other.getInst() != getInst())
return false;
if (Other.getNumSources() != getNumSources())
return false;
for (int i = 0, e = Other.getNumSources(); i != e; ++i)
if (Other.getSrcReg(i) != getSrcReg(i) ||
Other.getSrcSubReg(i) != getSrcSubReg(i))
return false;
return true;
}
};
/// Helper class to track the possible sources of a value defined by
/// a (chain of) copy related instructions.
/// Given a definition (instruction and definition index), this class
/// follows the use-def chain to find successive suitable sources.
/// The given source can be used to rewrite the definition into
/// def = COPY src.
///
/// For instance, let us consider the following snippet:
/// v0 =
/// v2 = INSERT_SUBREG v1, v0, sub0
/// def = COPY v2.sub0
///
/// Using a ValueTracker for def = COPY v2.sub0 will give the following
/// suitable sources:
/// v2.sub0 and v0.
/// Then, def can be rewritten into def = COPY v0.
class ValueTracker {
private:
/// The current point into the use-def chain.
const MachineInstr *Def = nullptr;
/// The index of the definition in Def.
unsigned DefIdx = 0;
/// The sub register index of the definition.
unsigned DefSubReg;
/// The register where the value can be found.
unsigned Reg;
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
/// MachineRegisterInfo used to perform tracking.
const MachineRegisterInfo &MRI;
/// Optional TargetInstrInfo used to perform some complex tracking.
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
const TargetInstrInfo *TII;
/// Dispatcher to the right underlying implementation of getNextSource.
ValueTrackerResult getNextSourceImpl();
/// Specialized version of getNextSource for Copy instructions.
ValueTrackerResult getNextSourceFromCopy();
/// Specialized version of getNextSource for Bitcast instructions.
ValueTrackerResult getNextSourceFromBitcast();
/// Specialized version of getNextSource for RegSequence instructions.
ValueTrackerResult getNextSourceFromRegSequence();
/// Specialized version of getNextSource for InsertSubreg instructions.
ValueTrackerResult getNextSourceFromInsertSubreg();
/// Specialized version of getNextSource for ExtractSubreg instructions.
ValueTrackerResult getNextSourceFromExtractSubreg();
/// Specialized version of getNextSource for SubregToReg instructions.
ValueTrackerResult getNextSourceFromSubregToReg();
/// Specialized version of getNextSource for PHI instructions.
ValueTrackerResult getNextSourceFromPHI();
public:
/// Create a ValueTracker instance for the value defined by \p Reg.
/// \p DefSubReg represents the sub register index the value tracker will
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
/// track. It does not need to match the sub register index used in the
/// definition of \p Reg.
/// If \p Reg is a physical register, a value tracker constructed with
/// this constructor will not find any alternative source.
/// Indeed, when \p Reg is a physical register that constructor does not
/// know which definition of \p Reg it should track.
/// Use the next constructor to track a physical register.
ValueTracker(unsigned Reg, unsigned DefSubReg,
const MachineRegisterInfo &MRI,
const TargetInstrInfo *TII = nullptr)
: DefSubReg(DefSubReg), Reg(Reg), MRI(MRI), TII(TII) {
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
if (!TargetRegisterInfo::isPhysicalRegister(Reg)) {
Def = MRI.getVRegDef(Reg);
DefIdx = MRI.def_begin(Reg).getOperandNo();
}
}
/// Following the use-def chain, get the next available source
/// for the tracked value.
/// \return A ValueTrackerResult containing a set of registers
/// and sub registers with tracked values. A ValueTrackerResult with
/// an empty set of registers means no source was found.
ValueTrackerResult getNextSource();
};
} // end anonymous namespace
char PeepholeOptimizer::ID = 0;
char &llvm::PeepholeOptimizerID = PeepholeOptimizer::ID;
INITIALIZE_PASS_BEGIN(PeepholeOptimizer, DEBUG_TYPE,
"Peephole Optimizations", false, false)
INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(MachineDominatorTree)
Remove redundant copy in recurrences Summary: If there is a chain of instructions formulating a recurrence, commuting operands can help removing a redundant copy. In the following example code, ``` BB#1: ; Loop Header %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: ; Loop Latch %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg1<kill,tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1,%vreg0 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg2<kill,tied0>, %vreg10<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2,%vreg10 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> ``` Existing two-address generation pass generates following code: ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg1<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` This is suboptimal because the assembly code generated has a redundant copy at the end of #BB6 to feed %vreg13 to BB#1: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %esi, %edi addl %ebx, %edi cmpl $10, %edi movl %edi, %esi jl .LBB0_1 ``` This redundant copy can be elimiated by making instructions in the recurrence chain to compute the value "into" the register that actually holds the feedback value. In this example, this can be achieved by commuting %vreg0 and %vreg1 to compute %vreg10. With that change, code after two-address generation becomes ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: derived from LLVM BB %bb7 Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg0<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg1<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` and the final assembly does not have redundant copy: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %edi, %eax addl %ebx, %eax cmpl $10, %eax jl .LBB0_1 ``` Reviewers: qcolombet, MatzeB, wmi Reviewed By: wmi Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31821 llvm-svn: 306758
2017-06-30 07:11:24 +08:00
INITIALIZE_PASS_DEPENDENCY(MachineLoopInfo)
INITIALIZE_PASS_END(PeepholeOptimizer, DEBUG_TYPE,
"Peephole Optimizations", false, false)
/// If instruction is a copy-like instruction, i.e. it reads a single register
/// and writes a single register and it does not modify the source, and if the
/// source value is preserved as a sub-register of the result, then replace all
/// reachable uses of the source with the subreg of the result.
2012-02-09 05:22:43 +08:00
///
/// Do not generate an EXTRACT that is used only in a debug use, as this changes
/// the code. Since this code does not currently share EXTRACTs, just ignore all
/// debug uses.
bool PeepholeOptimizer::
optimizeExtInstr(MachineInstr &MI, MachineBasicBlock &MBB,
SmallPtrSetImpl<MachineInstr*> &LocalMIs) {
unsigned SrcReg, DstReg, SubIdx;
if (!TII->isCoalescableExtInstr(MI, SrcReg, DstReg, SubIdx))
return false;
2012-02-09 05:22:43 +08:00
if (TargetRegisterInfo::isPhysicalRegister(DstReg) ||
TargetRegisterInfo::isPhysicalRegister(SrcReg))
return false;
if (MRI->hasOneNonDBGUse(SrcReg))
// No other uses.
return false;
// Ensure DstReg can get a register class that actually supports
// sub-registers. Don't change the class until we commit.
const TargetRegisterClass *DstRC = MRI->getRegClass(DstReg);
DstRC = TRI->getSubClassWithSubReg(DstRC, SubIdx);
if (!DstRC)
return false;
// The ext instr may be operating on a sub-register of SrcReg as well.
// PPC::EXTSW is a 32 -> 64-bit sign extension, but it reads a 64-bit
// register.
// If UseSrcSubIdx is Set, SubIdx also applies to SrcReg, and only uses of
// SrcReg:SubIdx should be replaced.
bool UseSrcSubIdx =
TRI->getSubClassWithSubReg(MRI->getRegClass(SrcReg), SubIdx) != nullptr;
// The source has other uses. See if we can replace the other uses with use of
// the result of the extension.
SmallPtrSet<MachineBasicBlock*, 4> ReachedBBs;
for (MachineInstr &UI : MRI->use_nodbg_instructions(DstReg))
ReachedBBs.insert(UI.getParent());
// Uses that are in the same BB of uses of the result of the instruction.
SmallVector<MachineOperand*, 8> Uses;
// Uses that the result of the instruction can reach.
SmallVector<MachineOperand*, 8> ExtendedUses;
bool ExtendLife = true;
for (MachineOperand &UseMO : MRI->use_nodbg_operands(SrcReg)) {
MachineInstr *UseMI = UseMO.getParent();
if (UseMI == &MI)
continue;
if (UseMI->isPHI()) {
ExtendLife = false;
continue;
}
// Only accept uses of SrcReg:SubIdx.
if (UseSrcSubIdx && UseMO.getSubReg() != SubIdx)
continue;
// It's an error to translate this:
//
// %reg1025 = <sext> %reg1024
// ...
// %reg1026 = SUBREG_TO_REG 0, %reg1024, 4
//
// into this:
//
// %reg1025 = <sext> %reg1024
// ...
// %reg1027 = COPY %reg1025:4
// %reg1026 = SUBREG_TO_REG 0, %reg1027, 4
//
// The problem here is that SUBREG_TO_REG is there to assert that an
// implicit zext occurs. It doesn't insert a zext instruction. If we allow
// the COPY here, it will give us the value after the <sext>, not the
// original value of %reg1024 before <sext>.
if (UseMI->getOpcode() == TargetOpcode::SUBREG_TO_REG)
continue;
MachineBasicBlock *UseMBB = UseMI->getParent();
if (UseMBB == &MBB) {
// Local uses that come after the extension.
if (!LocalMIs.count(UseMI))
Uses.push_back(&UseMO);
} else if (ReachedBBs.count(UseMBB)) {
// Non-local uses where the result of the extension is used. Always
// replace these unless it's a PHI.
Uses.push_back(&UseMO);
} else if (Aggressive && DT->dominates(&MBB, UseMBB)) {
// We may want to extend the live range of the extension result in order
// to replace these uses.
ExtendedUses.push_back(&UseMO);
} else {
// Both will be live out of the def MBB anyway. Don't extend live range of
// the extension result.
ExtendLife = false;
break;
}
}
if (ExtendLife && !ExtendedUses.empty())
// Extend the liveness of the extension result.
Uses.append(ExtendedUses.begin(), ExtendedUses.end());
// Now replace all uses.
bool Changed = false;
if (!Uses.empty()) {
SmallPtrSet<MachineBasicBlock*, 4> PHIBBs;
// Look for PHI uses of the extended result, we don't want to extend the
// liveness of a PHI input. It breaks all kinds of assumptions down
// stream. A PHI use is expected to be the kill of its source values.
for (MachineInstr &UI : MRI->use_nodbg_instructions(DstReg))
if (UI.isPHI())
PHIBBs.insert(UI.getParent());
const TargetRegisterClass *RC = MRI->getRegClass(SrcReg);
for (unsigned i = 0, e = Uses.size(); i != e; ++i) {
MachineOperand *UseMO = Uses[i];
MachineInstr *UseMI = UseMO->getParent();
MachineBasicBlock *UseMBB = UseMI->getParent();
if (PHIBBs.count(UseMBB))
continue;
// About to add uses of DstReg, clear DstReg's kill flags.
if (!Changed) {
MRI->clearKillFlags(DstReg);
MRI->constrainRegClass(DstReg, DstRC);
}
unsigned NewVR = MRI->createVirtualRegister(RC);
MachineInstr *Copy = BuildMI(*UseMBB, UseMI, UseMI->getDebugLoc(),
TII->get(TargetOpcode::COPY), NewVR)
.addReg(DstReg, 0, SubIdx);
// SubIdx applies to both SrcReg and DstReg when UseSrcSubIdx is set.
if (UseSrcSubIdx) {
Copy->getOperand(0).setSubReg(SubIdx);
Copy->getOperand(0).setIsUndef();
}
UseMO->setReg(NewVR);
++NumReuse;
Changed = true;
}
}
return Changed;
}
/// If the instruction is a compare and the previous instruction it's comparing
/// against already sets (or could be modified to set) the same flag as the
/// compare, then we can remove the comparison and use the flag from the
/// previous instruction.
bool PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCmpInstr(MachineInstr &MI) {
// If this instruction is a comparison against zero and isn't comparing a
// physical register, we can try to optimize it.
unsigned SrcReg, SrcReg2;
int CmpMask, CmpValue;
if (!TII->analyzeCompare(MI, SrcReg, SrcReg2, CmpMask, CmpValue) ||
TargetRegisterInfo::isPhysicalRegister(SrcReg) ||
(SrcReg2 != 0 && TargetRegisterInfo::isPhysicalRegister(SrcReg2)))
return false;
// Attempt to optimize the comparison instruction.
if (TII->optimizeCompareInstr(MI, SrcReg, SrcReg2, CmpMask, CmpValue, MRI)) {
++NumCmps;
return true;
}
return false;
}
/// Optimize a select instruction.
bool PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeSelect(MachineInstr &MI,
SmallPtrSetImpl<MachineInstr *> &LocalMIs) {
unsigned TrueOp = 0;
unsigned FalseOp = 0;
bool Optimizable = false;
SmallVector<MachineOperand, 4> Cond;
if (TII->analyzeSelect(MI, Cond, TrueOp, FalseOp, Optimizable))
return false;
if (!Optimizable)
return false;
if (!TII->optimizeSelect(MI, LocalMIs))
return false;
MI.eraseFromParent();
++NumSelects;
return true;
}
/// Check if a simpler conditional branch can be generated.
bool PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCondBranch(MachineInstr &MI) {
return TII->optimizeCondBranch(MI);
}
/// Try to find the next source that share the same register file
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
/// for the value defined by \p Reg and \p SubReg.
/// When true is returned, the \p RewriteMap can be used by the client to
/// retrieve all Def -> Use along the way up to the next source. Any found
/// Use that is not itself a key for another entry, is the next source to
/// use. During the search for the next source, multiple sources can be found
/// given multiple incoming sources of a PHI instruction. In this case, we
/// look in each PHI source for the next source; all found next sources must
/// share the same register file as \p Reg and \p SubReg. The client should
/// then be capable to rewrite all intermediate PHIs to get the next source.
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
/// \return False if no alternative sources are available. True otherwise.
bool PeepholeOptimizer::findNextSource(RegSubRegPair RegSubReg,
RewriteMapTy &RewriteMap) {
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
// Do not try to find a new source for a physical register.
// So far we do not have any motivating example for doing that.
// Thus, instead of maintaining untested code, we will revisit that if
// that changes at some point.
unsigned Reg = RegSubReg.Reg;
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
if (TargetRegisterInfo::isPhysicalRegister(Reg))
return false;
const TargetRegisterClass *DefRC = MRI->getRegClass(Reg);
SmallVector<RegSubRegPair, 4> SrcToLook;
RegSubRegPair CurSrcPair = RegSubReg;
SrcToLook.push_back(CurSrcPair);
unsigned PHICount = 0;
do {
CurSrcPair = SrcToLook.pop_back_val();
// As explained above, do not handle physical registers
if (TargetRegisterInfo::isPhysicalRegister(CurSrcPair.Reg))
return false;
ValueTracker ValTracker(CurSrcPair.Reg, CurSrcPair.SubReg, *MRI, TII);
// Follow the chain of copies until we find a more suitable source, a phi
// or have to abort.
while (true) {
ValueTrackerResult Res = ValTracker.getNextSource();
// Abort at the end of a chain (without finding a suitable source).
if (!Res.isValid())
return false;
// Insert the Def -> Use entry for the recently found source.
ValueTrackerResult CurSrcRes = RewriteMap.lookup(CurSrcPair);
if (CurSrcRes.isValid()) {
assert(CurSrcRes == Res && "ValueTrackerResult found must match");
// An existent entry with multiple sources is a PHI cycle we must avoid.
// Otherwise it's an entry with a valid next source we already found.
if (CurSrcRes.getNumSources() > 1) {
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs()
<< "findNextSource: found PHI cycle, aborting...\n");
return false;
}
break;
}
RewriteMap.insert(std::make_pair(CurSrcPair, Res));
// ValueTrackerResult usually have one source unless it's the result from
// a PHI instruction. Add the found PHI edges to be looked up further.
unsigned NumSrcs = Res.getNumSources();
if (NumSrcs > 1) {
PHICount++;
if (PHICount >= RewritePHILimit) {
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "findNextSource: PHI limit reached\n");
return false;
}
for (unsigned i = 0; i < NumSrcs; ++i)
SrcToLook.push_back(Res.getSrc(i));
break;
}
CurSrcPair = Res.getSrc(0);
// Do not extend the live-ranges of physical registers as they add
// constraints to the register allocator. Moreover, if we want to extend
// the live-range of a physical register, unlike SSA virtual register,
// we will have to check that they aren't redefine before the related use.
if (TargetRegisterInfo::isPhysicalRegister(CurSrcPair.Reg))
return false;
// Keep following the chain if the value isn't any better yet.
const TargetRegisterClass *SrcRC = MRI->getRegClass(CurSrcPair.Reg);
if (!TRI->shouldRewriteCopySrc(DefRC, RegSubReg.SubReg, SrcRC,
CurSrcPair.SubReg))
continue;
// We currently cannot deal with subreg operands on PHI instructions
// (see insertPHI()).
if (PHICount > 0 && CurSrcPair.SubReg != 0)
continue;
// We found a suitable source, and are done with this chain.
break;
}
} while (!SrcToLook.empty());
// If we did not find a more suitable source, there is nothing to optimize.
return CurSrcPair.Reg != Reg;
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
}
/// Insert a PHI instruction with incoming edges \p SrcRegs that are
/// guaranteed to have the same register class. This is necessary whenever we
/// successfully traverse a PHI instruction and find suitable sources coming
/// from its edges. By inserting a new PHI, we provide a rewritten PHI def
/// suitable to be used in a new COPY instruction.
static MachineInstr &
insertPHI(MachineRegisterInfo &MRI, const TargetInstrInfo &TII,
const SmallVectorImpl<RegSubRegPair> &SrcRegs,
MachineInstr &OrigPHI) {
assert(!SrcRegs.empty() && "No sources to create a PHI instruction?");
const TargetRegisterClass *NewRC = MRI.getRegClass(SrcRegs[0].Reg);
// NewRC is only correct if no subregisters are involved. findNextSource()
// should have rejected those cases already.
assert(SrcRegs[0].SubReg == 0 && "should not have subreg operand");
unsigned NewVR = MRI.createVirtualRegister(NewRC);
MachineBasicBlock *MBB = OrigPHI.getParent();
MachineInstrBuilder MIB = BuildMI(*MBB, &OrigPHI, OrigPHI.getDebugLoc(),
TII.get(TargetOpcode::PHI), NewVR);
unsigned MBBOpIdx = 2;
for (const RegSubRegPair &RegPair : SrcRegs) {
MIB.addReg(RegPair.Reg, 0, RegPair.SubReg);
MIB.addMBB(OrigPHI.getOperand(MBBOpIdx).getMBB());
// Since we're extended the lifetime of RegPair.Reg, clear the
// kill flags to account for that and make RegPair.Reg reaches
// the new PHI.
MRI.clearKillFlags(RegPair.Reg);
MBBOpIdx += 2;
}
return *MIB;
}
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
namespace {
/// Interface to query instructions amenable to copy rewriting.
class Rewriter {
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
protected:
MachineInstr &CopyLike;
unsigned CurrentSrcIdx = 0; ///< The index of the source being rewritten.
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
public:
Rewriter(MachineInstr &CopyLike) : CopyLike(CopyLike) {}
virtual ~Rewriter() {}
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
/// Get the next rewritable source (SrcReg, SrcSubReg) and
/// the related value that it affects (DstReg, DstSubReg).
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
/// A source is considered rewritable if its register class and the
/// register class of the related DstReg may not be register
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
/// coalescer friendly. In other words, given a copy-like instruction
/// not all the arguments may be returned at rewritable source, since
/// some arguments are none to be register coalescer friendly.
///
/// Each call of this method moves the current source to the next
/// rewritable source.
/// For instance, let CopyLike be the instruction to rewrite.
/// CopyLike has one definition and one source:
/// dst.dstSubIdx = CopyLike src.srcSubIdx.
///
/// The first call will give the first rewritable source, i.e.,
/// the only source this instruction has:
/// (SrcReg, SrcSubReg) = (src, srcSubIdx).
/// This source defines the whole definition, i.e.,
/// (DstReg, DstSubReg) = (dst, dstSubIdx).
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
///
2015-09-09 08:38:33 +08:00
/// The second and subsequent calls will return false, as there is only one
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
/// rewritable source.
///
/// \return True if a rewritable source has been found, false otherwise.
/// The output arguments are valid if and only if true is returned.
virtual bool getNextRewritableSource(RegSubRegPair &Src,
RegSubRegPair &Dst) = 0;
/// Rewrite the current source with \p NewReg and \p NewSubReg if possible.
/// \return True if the rewriting was possible, false otherwise.
virtual bool RewriteCurrentSource(unsigned NewReg, unsigned NewSubReg) = 0;
};
/// Rewriter for COPY instructions.
class CopyRewriter : public Rewriter {
public:
CopyRewriter(MachineInstr &MI) : Rewriter(MI) {
assert(MI.isCopy() && "Expected copy instruction");
}
virtual ~CopyRewriter() = default;
bool getNextRewritableSource(RegSubRegPair &Src,
RegSubRegPair &Dst) override {
// CurrentSrcIdx > 0 means this function has already been called.
if (CurrentSrcIdx > 0)
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
return false;
// This is the first call to getNextRewritableSource.
// Move the CurrentSrcIdx to remember that we made that call.
CurrentSrcIdx = 1;
// The rewritable source is the argument.
const MachineOperand &MOSrc = CopyLike.getOperand(1);
Src = RegSubRegPair(MOSrc.getReg(), MOSrc.getSubReg());
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
// What we track are the alternative sources of the definition.
const MachineOperand &MODef = CopyLike.getOperand(0);
Dst = RegSubRegPair(MODef.getReg(), MODef.getSubReg());
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
return true;
}
bool RewriteCurrentSource(unsigned NewReg, unsigned NewSubReg) override {
if (CurrentSrcIdx != 1)
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
return false;
MachineOperand &MOSrc = CopyLike.getOperand(CurrentSrcIdx);
MOSrc.setReg(NewReg);
MOSrc.setSubReg(NewSubReg);
return true;
}
};
/// Helper class to rewrite uncoalescable copy like instructions
/// into new COPY (coalescable friendly) instructions.
class UncoalescableRewriter : public Rewriter {
unsigned NumDefs; ///< Number of defs in the bitcast.
public:
UncoalescableRewriter(MachineInstr &MI) : Rewriter(MI) {
NumDefs = MI.getDesc().getNumDefs();
}
/// \see See Rewriter::getNextRewritableSource()
/// All such sources need to be considered rewritable in order to
/// rewrite a uncoalescable copy-like instruction. This method return
/// each definition that must be checked if rewritable.
bool getNextRewritableSource(RegSubRegPair &Src,
RegSubRegPair &Dst) override {
// Find the next non-dead definition and continue from there.
if (CurrentSrcIdx == NumDefs)
return false;
while (CopyLike.getOperand(CurrentSrcIdx).isDead()) {
++CurrentSrcIdx;
if (CurrentSrcIdx == NumDefs)
return false;
}
// What we track are the alternative sources of the definition.
Src = RegSubRegPair(0, 0);
const MachineOperand &MODef = CopyLike.getOperand(CurrentSrcIdx);
Dst = RegSubRegPair(MODef.getReg(), MODef.getSubReg());
CurrentSrcIdx++;
return true;
}
bool RewriteCurrentSource(unsigned NewReg, unsigned NewSubReg) override {
return false;
}
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
};
/// Specialized rewriter for INSERT_SUBREG instruction.
class InsertSubregRewriter : public Rewriter {
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
public:
InsertSubregRewriter(MachineInstr &MI) : Rewriter(MI) {
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
assert(MI.isInsertSubreg() && "Invalid instruction");
}
/// \see See Rewriter::getNextRewritableSource()
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
/// Here CopyLike has the following form:
/// dst = INSERT_SUBREG Src1, Src2.src2SubIdx, subIdx.
/// Src1 has the same register class has dst, hence, there is
/// nothing to rewrite.
/// Src2.src2SubIdx, may not be register coalescer friendly.
/// Therefore, the first call to this method returns:
/// (SrcReg, SrcSubReg) = (Src2, src2SubIdx).
/// (DstReg, DstSubReg) = (dst, subIdx).
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
///
/// Subsequence calls will return false.
bool getNextRewritableSource(RegSubRegPair &Src,
RegSubRegPair &Dst) override {
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
// If we already get the only source we can rewrite, return false.
if (CurrentSrcIdx == 2)
return false;
// We are looking at v2 = INSERT_SUBREG v0, v1, sub0.
CurrentSrcIdx = 2;
const MachineOperand &MOInsertedReg = CopyLike.getOperand(2);
Src = RegSubRegPair(MOInsertedReg.getReg(), MOInsertedReg.getSubReg());
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
const MachineOperand &MODef = CopyLike.getOperand(0);
// We want to track something that is compatible with the
// partial definition.
if (MODef.getSubReg())
2015-09-09 08:38:33 +08:00
// Bail if we have to compose sub-register indices.
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
return false;
Dst = RegSubRegPair(MODef.getReg(),
(unsigned)CopyLike.getOperand(3).getImm());
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
return true;
}
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
bool RewriteCurrentSource(unsigned NewReg, unsigned NewSubReg) override {
if (CurrentSrcIdx != 2)
return false;
// We are rewriting the inserted reg.
MachineOperand &MO = CopyLike.getOperand(CurrentSrcIdx);
MO.setReg(NewReg);
MO.setSubReg(NewSubReg);
return true;
}
};
/// Specialized rewriter for EXTRACT_SUBREG instruction.
class ExtractSubregRewriter : public Rewriter {
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
const TargetInstrInfo &TII;
public:
ExtractSubregRewriter(MachineInstr &MI, const TargetInstrInfo &TII)
: Rewriter(MI), TII(TII) {
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
assert(MI.isExtractSubreg() && "Invalid instruction");
}
/// \see Rewriter::getNextRewritableSource()
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
/// Here CopyLike has the following form:
/// dst.dstSubIdx = EXTRACT_SUBREG Src, subIdx.
/// There is only one rewritable source: Src.subIdx,
/// which defines dst.dstSubIdx.
bool getNextRewritableSource(RegSubRegPair &Src,
RegSubRegPair &Dst) override {
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
// If we already get the only source we can rewrite, return false.
if (CurrentSrcIdx == 1)
return false;
// We are looking at v1 = EXTRACT_SUBREG v0, sub0.
CurrentSrcIdx = 1;
const MachineOperand &MOExtractedReg = CopyLike.getOperand(1);
2015-09-09 08:38:33 +08:00
// If we have to compose sub-register indices, bail out.
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
if (MOExtractedReg.getSubReg())
return false;
Src = RegSubRegPair(MOExtractedReg.getReg(),
CopyLike.getOperand(2).getImm());
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
// We want to track something that is compatible with the definition.
const MachineOperand &MODef = CopyLike.getOperand(0);
Dst = RegSubRegPair(MODef.getReg(), MODef.getSubReg());
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
return true;
}
bool RewriteCurrentSource(unsigned NewReg, unsigned NewSubReg) override {
// The only source we can rewrite is the input register.
if (CurrentSrcIdx != 1)
return false;
CopyLike.getOperand(CurrentSrcIdx).setReg(NewReg);
// If we find a source that does not require to extract something,
// rewrite the operation with a copy.
if (!NewSubReg) {
// Move the current index to an invalid position.
// We do not want another call to this method to be able
// to do any change.
CurrentSrcIdx = -1;
// Rewrite the operation as a COPY.
// Get rid of the sub-register index.
CopyLike.RemoveOperand(2);
// Morph the operation into a COPY.
CopyLike.setDesc(TII.get(TargetOpcode::COPY));
return true;
}
CopyLike.getOperand(CurrentSrcIdx + 1).setImm(NewSubReg);
return true;
}
};
/// Specialized rewriter for REG_SEQUENCE instruction.
class RegSequenceRewriter : public Rewriter {
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
public:
RegSequenceRewriter(MachineInstr &MI) : Rewriter(MI) {
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
assert(MI.isRegSequence() && "Invalid instruction");
}
/// \see Rewriter::getNextRewritableSource()
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
/// Here CopyLike has the following form:
/// dst = REG_SEQUENCE Src1.src1SubIdx, subIdx1, Src2.src2SubIdx, subIdx2.
/// Each call will return a different source, walking all the available
/// source.
///
/// The first call returns:
/// (SrcReg, SrcSubReg) = (Src1, src1SubIdx).
/// (DstReg, DstSubReg) = (dst, subIdx1).
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
///
/// The second call returns:
/// (SrcReg, SrcSubReg) = (Src2, src2SubIdx).
/// (DstReg, DstSubReg) = (dst, subIdx2).
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
///
/// And so on, until all the sources have been traversed, then
/// it returns false.
bool getNextRewritableSource(RegSubRegPair &Src,
RegSubRegPair &Dst) override {
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
// We are looking at v0 = REG_SEQUENCE v1, sub1, v2, sub2, etc.
// If this is the first call, move to the first argument.
if (CurrentSrcIdx == 0) {
CurrentSrcIdx = 1;
} else {
// Otherwise, move to the next argument and check that it is valid.
CurrentSrcIdx += 2;
if (CurrentSrcIdx >= CopyLike.getNumOperands())
return false;
}
const MachineOperand &MOInsertedReg = CopyLike.getOperand(CurrentSrcIdx);
Src.Reg = MOInsertedReg.getReg();
2015-09-09 08:38:33 +08:00
// If we have to compose sub-register indices, bail out.
if ((Src.SubReg = MOInsertedReg.getSubReg()))
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
return false;
// We want to track something that is compatible with the related
// partial definition.
Dst.SubReg = CopyLike.getOperand(CurrentSrcIdx + 1).getImm();
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
const MachineOperand &MODef = CopyLike.getOperand(0);
Dst.Reg = MODef.getReg();
2015-09-09 08:38:33 +08:00
// If we have to compose sub-registers, bail.
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
return MODef.getSubReg() == 0;
}
bool RewriteCurrentSource(unsigned NewReg, unsigned NewSubReg) override {
// We cannot rewrite out of bound operands.
// Moreover, rewritable sources are at odd positions.
if ((CurrentSrcIdx & 1) != 1 || CurrentSrcIdx > CopyLike.getNumOperands())
return false;
MachineOperand &MO = CopyLike.getOperand(CurrentSrcIdx);
MO.setReg(NewReg);
MO.setSubReg(NewSubReg);
return true;
}
};
} // end anonymous namespace
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
/// Get the appropriated Rewriter for \p MI.
/// \return A pointer to a dynamically allocated Rewriter or nullptr if no
/// rewriter works for \p MI.
static Rewriter *getCopyRewriter(MachineInstr &MI, const TargetInstrInfo &TII) {
// Handle uncoalescable copy-like instructions.
if (MI.isBitcast() || MI.isRegSequenceLike() || MI.isInsertSubregLike() ||
MI.isExtractSubregLike())
return new UncoalescableRewriter(MI);
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
switch (MI.getOpcode()) {
default:
return nullptr;
case TargetOpcode::COPY:
return new CopyRewriter(MI);
case TargetOpcode::INSERT_SUBREG:
return new InsertSubregRewriter(MI);
case TargetOpcode::EXTRACT_SUBREG:
return new ExtractSubregRewriter(MI, TII);
case TargetOpcode::REG_SEQUENCE:
return new RegSequenceRewriter(MI);
}
}
/// Given a \p Def.Reg and Def.SubReg pair, use \p RewriteMap to find
/// the new source to use for rewrite. If \p HandleMultipleSources is true and
/// multiple sources for a given \p Def are found along the way, we found a
/// PHI instructions that needs to be rewritten.
/// TODO: HandleMultipleSources should be removed once we test PHI handling
/// with coalescable copies.
static RegSubRegPair
getNewSource(MachineRegisterInfo *MRI, const TargetInstrInfo *TII,
RegSubRegPair Def,
const PeepholeOptimizer::RewriteMapTy &RewriteMap,
bool HandleMultipleSources = true) {
RegSubRegPair LookupSrc(Def.Reg, Def.SubReg);
while (true) {
ValueTrackerResult Res = RewriteMap.lookup(LookupSrc);
// If there are no entries on the map, LookupSrc is the new source.
if (!Res.isValid())
return LookupSrc;
// There's only one source for this definition, keep searching...
unsigned NumSrcs = Res.getNumSources();
if (NumSrcs == 1) {
LookupSrc.Reg = Res.getSrcReg(0);
LookupSrc.SubReg = Res.getSrcSubReg(0);
continue;
}
// TODO: Remove once multiple srcs w/ coalescable copies are supported.
if (!HandleMultipleSources)
break;
// Multiple sources, recurse into each source to find a new source
// for it. Then, rewrite the PHI accordingly to its new edges.
SmallVector<RegSubRegPair, 4> NewPHISrcs;
for (unsigned i = 0; i < NumSrcs; ++i) {
RegSubRegPair PHISrc(Res.getSrcReg(i), Res.getSrcSubReg(i));
NewPHISrcs.push_back(
getNewSource(MRI, TII, PHISrc, RewriteMap, HandleMultipleSources));
}
// Build the new PHI node and return its def register as the new source.
MachineInstr &OrigPHI = const_cast<MachineInstr &>(*Res.getInst());
MachineInstr &NewPHI = insertPHI(*MRI, *TII, NewPHISrcs, OrigPHI);
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "-- getNewSource\n");
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Replacing: " << OrigPHI);
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " With: " << NewPHI);
const MachineOperand &MODef = NewPHI.getOperand(0);
return RegSubRegPair(MODef.getReg(), MODef.getSubReg());
}
return RegSubRegPair(0, 0);
}
/// Optimize generic copy instructions to avoid cross register bank copy.
/// The optimization looks through a chain of copies and tries to find a source
/// that has a compatible register class.
/// Two register classes are considered to be compatible if they share the same
/// register bank.
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
/// New copies issued by this optimization are register allocator
/// friendly. This optimization does not remove any copy as it may
2015-09-09 08:38:33 +08:00
/// overconstrain the register allocator, but replaces some operands
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
/// when possible.
/// \pre isCoalescableCopy(*MI) is true.
/// \return True, when \p MI has been rewritten. False otherwise.
bool PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy(MachineInstr &MI) {
assert(isCoalescableCopy(MI) && "Invalid argument");
assert(MI.getDesc().getNumDefs() == 1 &&
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
"Coalescer can understand multiple defs?!");
const MachineOperand &MODef = MI.getOperand(0);
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
// Do not rewrite physical definitions.
if (TargetRegisterInfo::isPhysicalRegister(MODef.getReg()))
return false;
bool Changed = false;
// Get the right rewriter for the current copy.
std::unique_ptr<Rewriter> CpyRewriter(getCopyRewriter(MI, *TII));
2015-09-09 08:38:33 +08:00
// If none exists, bail out.
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
if (!CpyRewriter)
return false;
// Rewrite each rewritable source.
RegSubRegPair Src;
RegSubRegPair TrackPair;
while (CpyRewriter->getNextRewritableSource(Src, TrackPair)) {
// Keep track of PHI nodes and its incoming edges when looking for sources.
RewriteMapTy RewriteMap;
// Try to find a more suitable source. If we failed to do so, or get the
// actual source, move to the next source.
if (!findNextSource(TrackPair, RewriteMap))
continue;
// Get the new source to rewrite. TODO: Only enable handling of multiple
// sources (PHIs) once we have a motivating example and testcases for it.
RegSubRegPair NewSrc = getNewSource(MRI, TII, TrackPair, RewriteMap,
/*HandleMultipleSources=*/false);
if (Src.Reg == NewSrc.Reg || NewSrc.Reg == 0)
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
continue;
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
// Rewrite source.
if (CpyRewriter->RewriteCurrentSource(NewSrc.Reg, NewSrc.SubReg)) {
// We may have extended the live-range of NewSrc, account for that.
MRI->clearKillFlags(NewSrc.Reg);
Changed = true;
}
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
}
// TODO: We could have a clean-up method to tidy the instruction.
// E.g., v0 = INSERT_SUBREG v1, v1.sub0, sub0
// => v0 = COPY v1
// Currently we haven't seen motivating example for that and we
// want to avoid untested code.
NumRewrittenCopies += Changed;
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
return Changed;
}
/// Rewrite the source found through \p Def, by using the \p RewriteMap
/// and create a new COPY instruction. More info about RewriteMap in
/// PeepholeOptimizer::findNextSource. Right now this is only used to handle
/// Uncoalescable copies, since they are copy like instructions that aren't
/// recognized by the register allocator.
MachineInstr &
PeepholeOptimizer::rewriteSource(MachineInstr &CopyLike,
RegSubRegPair Def, RewriteMapTy &RewriteMap) {
assert(!TargetRegisterInfo::isPhysicalRegister(Def.Reg) &&
"We do not rewrite physical registers");
// Find the new source to use in the COPY rewrite.
RegSubRegPair NewSrc = getNewSource(MRI, TII, Def, RewriteMap);
// Insert the COPY.
const TargetRegisterClass *DefRC = MRI->getRegClass(Def.Reg);
unsigned NewVReg = MRI->createVirtualRegister(DefRC);
MachineInstr *NewCopy =
BuildMI(*CopyLike.getParent(), &CopyLike, CopyLike.getDebugLoc(),
TII->get(TargetOpcode::COPY), NewVReg)
.addReg(NewSrc.Reg, 0, NewSrc.SubReg);
if (Def.SubReg) {
NewCopy->getOperand(0).setSubReg(Def.SubReg);
NewCopy->getOperand(0).setIsUndef();
}
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "-- RewriteSource\n");
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " Replacing: " << CopyLike);
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " With: " << *NewCopy);
MRI->replaceRegWith(Def.Reg, NewVReg);
MRI->clearKillFlags(NewVReg);
// We extended the lifetime of NewSrc.Reg, clear the kill flags to
// account for that.
MRI->clearKillFlags(NewSrc.Reg);
return *NewCopy;
}
/// Optimize copy-like instructions to create
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
/// register coalescer friendly instruction.
/// The optimization tries to kill-off the \p MI by looking
/// through a chain of copies to find a source that has a compatible
/// register class.
/// If such a source is found, it replace \p MI by a generic COPY
/// operation.
/// \pre isUncoalescableCopy(*MI) is true.
/// \return True, when \p MI has been optimized. In that case, \p MI has
/// been removed from its parent.
/// All COPY instructions created, are inserted in \p LocalMIs.
bool PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy(
MachineInstr &MI, SmallPtrSetImpl<MachineInstr *> &LocalMIs) {
assert(isUncoalescableCopy(MI) && "Invalid argument");
UncoalescableRewriter CpyRewriter(MI);
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
// Rewrite each rewritable source by generating new COPYs. This works
// differently from optimizeCoalescableCopy since it first makes sure that all
// definitions can be rewritten.
RewriteMapTy RewriteMap;
RegSubRegPair Src;
RegSubRegPair Def;
SmallVector<RegSubRegPair, 4> RewritePairs;
while (CpyRewriter.getNextRewritableSource(Src, Def)) {
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
// If a physical register is here, this is probably for a good reason.
// Do not rewrite that.
if (TargetRegisterInfo::isPhysicalRegister(Def.Reg))
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
return false;
// If we do not know how to rewrite this definition, there is no point
// in trying to kill this instruction.
if (!findNextSource(Def, RewriteMap))
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
return false;
RewritePairs.push_back(Def);
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
}
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
// The change is possible for all defs, do it.
for (const RegSubRegPair &Def : RewritePairs) {
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
// Rewrite the "copy" in a way the register coalescer understands.
MachineInstr &NewCopy = rewriteSource(MI, Def, RewriteMap);
LocalMIs.insert(&NewCopy);
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
}
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
// MI is now dead.
MI.eraseFromParent();
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
++NumUncoalescableCopies;
return true;
}
/// Check whether MI is a candidate for folding into a later instruction.
/// We only fold loads to virtual registers and the virtual register defined
/// has a single use.
bool PeepholeOptimizer::isLoadFoldable(
MachineInstr &MI, SmallSet<unsigned, 16> &FoldAsLoadDefCandidates) {
if (!MI.canFoldAsLoad() || !MI.mayLoad())
return false;
const MCInstrDesc &MCID = MI.getDesc();
if (MCID.getNumDefs() != 1)
return false;
unsigned Reg = MI.getOperand(0).getReg();
// To reduce compilation time, we check MRI->hasOneNonDBGUse when inserting
// loads. It should be checked when processing uses of the load, since
// uses can be removed during peephole.
if (!MI.getOperand(0).getSubReg() &&
TargetRegisterInfo::isVirtualRegister(Reg) &&
MRI->hasOneNonDBGUse(Reg)) {
FoldAsLoadDefCandidates.insert(Reg);
return true;
}
return false;
}
2015-12-30 03:34:53 +08:00
bool PeepholeOptimizer::isMoveImmediate(
MachineInstr &MI, SmallSet<unsigned, 4> &ImmDefRegs,
2015-12-30 03:34:53 +08:00
DenseMap<unsigned, MachineInstr *> &ImmDefMIs) {
const MCInstrDesc &MCID = MI.getDesc();
if (!MI.isMoveImmediate())
return false;
if (MCID.getNumDefs() != 1)
return false;
unsigned Reg = MI.getOperand(0).getReg();
if (TargetRegisterInfo::isVirtualRegister(Reg)) {
ImmDefMIs.insert(std::make_pair(Reg, &MI));
ImmDefRegs.insert(Reg);
return true;
}
2012-02-09 05:22:43 +08:00
return false;
}
/// Try folding register operands that are defined by move immediate
/// instructions, i.e. a trivial constant folding optimization, if
/// and only if the def and use are in the same BB.
bool PeepholeOptimizer::foldImmediate(MachineInstr &MI,
SmallSet<unsigned, 4> &ImmDefRegs,
2015-12-30 03:34:53 +08:00
DenseMap<unsigned, MachineInstr *> &ImmDefMIs) {
for (unsigned i = 0, e = MI.getDesc().getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i) {
MachineOperand &MO = MI.getOperand(i);
if (!MO.isReg() || MO.isDef())
continue;
// Ignore dead implicit defs.
if (MO.isImplicit() && MO.isDead())
continue;
unsigned Reg = MO.getReg();
if (!TargetRegisterInfo::isVirtualRegister(Reg))
continue;
if (ImmDefRegs.count(Reg) == 0)
continue;
DenseMap<unsigned, MachineInstr*>::iterator II = ImmDefMIs.find(Reg);
CodeGen peephole: fold redundant phys reg copies Code generation often exposes redundant physical register copies through virtual registers such as: %vreg = COPY %PHYSREG ... %PHYSREG = COPY %vreg There are cases where no intervening clobber of %PHYSREG occurs, and the later copy could therefore be removed. In some cases this further allows us to remove the initial copy. This patch contains a motivating example which comes from the x86 build of Chrome, specifically cc::ResourceProvider::UnlockForRead uses libstdc++'s implementation of hash_map. That example has two tests live at the same time, and after machine sinking LLVM has confused itself enough and things spilling EFLAGS is a great idea even though it's never restored and the comparison results are both live. Before this patch we have: DEC32m %RIP, 1, %noreg, <ga:@L>, %noreg, %EFLAGS<imp-def> %vreg1<def> = COPY %EFLAGS; GR64:%vreg1 %EFLAGS<def> = COPY %vreg1; GR64:%vreg1 JNE_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use> Both copies are useless. This patch tries to eliminate the later copy in a generic manner. dec is especially confusing to LLVM when compared with sub. I wrote this patch to treat all physical registers generically, but only remove redundant copies of non-allocatable physical registers because the allocatable ones caused issues (e.g. when calling conventions weren't properly modeled) and should be handled later by the register allocator anyways. The following tests used to failed when the patch also replaced allocatable registers: CodeGen/X86/StackColoring.ll CodeGen/X86/avx512-calling-conv.ll CodeGen/X86/copy-propagation.ll CodeGen/X86/inline-asm-fpstack.ll CodeGen/X86/musttail-varargs.ll CodeGen/X86/pop-stack-cleanup.ll CodeGen/X86/preserve_mostcc64.ll CodeGen/X86/tailcallstack64.ll CodeGen/X86/this-return-64.ll This happens because COPY has other special meaning for e.g. dependency breakage and x87 FP stack. Note that all other backends' tests pass. Reviewers: qcolombet Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15157 llvm-svn: 254665
2015-12-04 07:43:56 +08:00
assert(II != ImmDefMIs.end() && "couldn't find immediate definition");
if (TII->FoldImmediate(MI, *II->second, Reg, MRI)) {
++NumImmFold;
return true;
}
}
return false;
}
// FIXME: This is very simple and misses some cases which should be handled when
// motivating examples are found.
//
// The copy rewriting logic should look at uses as well as defs and be able to
// eliminate copies across blocks.
//
// Later copies that are subregister extracts will also not be eliminated since
// only the first copy is considered.
//
// e.g.
// %1 = COPY %0
// %2 = COPY %0:sub1
//
// Should replace %2 uses with %1:sub1
bool PeepholeOptimizer::foldRedundantCopy(MachineInstr &MI,
SmallSet<unsigned, 4> &CopySrcRegs,
CodeGen peephole: fold redundant phys reg copies Code generation often exposes redundant physical register copies through virtual registers such as: %vreg = COPY %PHYSREG ... %PHYSREG = COPY %vreg There are cases where no intervening clobber of %PHYSREG occurs, and the later copy could therefore be removed. In some cases this further allows us to remove the initial copy. This patch contains a motivating example which comes from the x86 build of Chrome, specifically cc::ResourceProvider::UnlockForRead uses libstdc++'s implementation of hash_map. That example has two tests live at the same time, and after machine sinking LLVM has confused itself enough and things spilling EFLAGS is a great idea even though it's never restored and the comparison results are both live. Before this patch we have: DEC32m %RIP, 1, %noreg, <ga:@L>, %noreg, %EFLAGS<imp-def> %vreg1<def> = COPY %EFLAGS; GR64:%vreg1 %EFLAGS<def> = COPY %vreg1; GR64:%vreg1 JNE_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use> Both copies are useless. This patch tries to eliminate the later copy in a generic manner. dec is especially confusing to LLVM when compared with sub. I wrote this patch to treat all physical registers generically, but only remove redundant copies of non-allocatable physical registers because the allocatable ones caused issues (e.g. when calling conventions weren't properly modeled) and should be handled later by the register allocator anyways. The following tests used to failed when the patch also replaced allocatable registers: CodeGen/X86/StackColoring.ll CodeGen/X86/avx512-calling-conv.ll CodeGen/X86/copy-propagation.ll CodeGen/X86/inline-asm-fpstack.ll CodeGen/X86/musttail-varargs.ll CodeGen/X86/pop-stack-cleanup.ll CodeGen/X86/preserve_mostcc64.ll CodeGen/X86/tailcallstack64.ll CodeGen/X86/this-return-64.ll This happens because COPY has other special meaning for e.g. dependency breakage and x87 FP stack. Note that all other backends' tests pass. Reviewers: qcolombet Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15157 llvm-svn: 254665
2015-12-04 07:43:56 +08:00
DenseMap<unsigned, MachineInstr *> &CopyMIs) {
assert(MI.isCopy() && "expected a COPY machine instruction");
unsigned SrcReg = MI.getOperand(1).getReg();
if (!TargetRegisterInfo::isVirtualRegister(SrcReg))
return false;
unsigned DstReg = MI.getOperand(0).getReg();
if (!TargetRegisterInfo::isVirtualRegister(DstReg))
return false;
if (CopySrcRegs.insert(SrcReg).second) {
// First copy of this reg seen.
CopyMIs.insert(std::make_pair(SrcReg, &MI));
return false;
}
MachineInstr *PrevCopy = CopyMIs.find(SrcReg)->second;
unsigned SrcSubReg = MI.getOperand(1).getSubReg();
unsigned PrevSrcSubReg = PrevCopy->getOperand(1).getSubReg();
// Can't replace different subregister extracts.
if (SrcSubReg != PrevSrcSubReg)
return false;
unsigned PrevDstReg = PrevCopy->getOperand(0).getReg();
// Only replace if the copy register class is the same.
//
// TODO: If we have multiple copies to different register classes, we may want
// to track multiple copies of the same source register.
if (MRI->getRegClass(DstReg) != MRI->getRegClass(PrevDstReg))
return false;
MRI->replaceRegWith(DstReg, PrevDstReg);
// Lifetime of the previous copy has been extended.
MRI->clearKillFlags(PrevDstReg);
return true;
}
CodeGen peephole: fold redundant phys reg copies Code generation often exposes redundant physical register copies through virtual registers such as: %vreg = COPY %PHYSREG ... %PHYSREG = COPY %vreg There are cases where no intervening clobber of %PHYSREG occurs, and the later copy could therefore be removed. In some cases this further allows us to remove the initial copy. This patch contains a motivating example which comes from the x86 build of Chrome, specifically cc::ResourceProvider::UnlockForRead uses libstdc++'s implementation of hash_map. That example has two tests live at the same time, and after machine sinking LLVM has confused itself enough and things spilling EFLAGS is a great idea even though it's never restored and the comparison results are both live. Before this patch we have: DEC32m %RIP, 1, %noreg, <ga:@L>, %noreg, %EFLAGS<imp-def> %vreg1<def> = COPY %EFLAGS; GR64:%vreg1 %EFLAGS<def> = COPY %vreg1; GR64:%vreg1 JNE_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use> Both copies are useless. This patch tries to eliminate the later copy in a generic manner. dec is especially confusing to LLVM when compared with sub. I wrote this patch to treat all physical registers generically, but only remove redundant copies of non-allocatable physical registers because the allocatable ones caused issues (e.g. when calling conventions weren't properly modeled) and should be handled later by the register allocator anyways. The following tests used to failed when the patch also replaced allocatable registers: CodeGen/X86/StackColoring.ll CodeGen/X86/avx512-calling-conv.ll CodeGen/X86/copy-propagation.ll CodeGen/X86/inline-asm-fpstack.ll CodeGen/X86/musttail-varargs.ll CodeGen/X86/pop-stack-cleanup.ll CodeGen/X86/preserve_mostcc64.ll CodeGen/X86/tailcallstack64.ll CodeGen/X86/this-return-64.ll This happens because COPY has other special meaning for e.g. dependency breakage and x87 FP stack. Note that all other backends' tests pass. Reviewers: qcolombet Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15157 llvm-svn: 254665
2015-12-04 07:43:56 +08:00
bool PeepholeOptimizer::isNAPhysCopy(unsigned Reg) {
return TargetRegisterInfo::isPhysicalRegister(Reg) &&
!MRI->isAllocatable(Reg);
}
bool PeepholeOptimizer::foldRedundantNAPhysCopy(
MachineInstr &MI, DenseMap<unsigned, MachineInstr *> &NAPhysToVirtMIs) {
assert(MI.isCopy() && "expected a COPY machine instruction");
CodeGen peephole: fold redundant phys reg copies Code generation often exposes redundant physical register copies through virtual registers such as: %vreg = COPY %PHYSREG ... %PHYSREG = COPY %vreg There are cases where no intervening clobber of %PHYSREG occurs, and the later copy could therefore be removed. In some cases this further allows us to remove the initial copy. This patch contains a motivating example which comes from the x86 build of Chrome, specifically cc::ResourceProvider::UnlockForRead uses libstdc++'s implementation of hash_map. That example has two tests live at the same time, and after machine sinking LLVM has confused itself enough and things spilling EFLAGS is a great idea even though it's never restored and the comparison results are both live. Before this patch we have: DEC32m %RIP, 1, %noreg, <ga:@L>, %noreg, %EFLAGS<imp-def> %vreg1<def> = COPY %EFLAGS; GR64:%vreg1 %EFLAGS<def> = COPY %vreg1; GR64:%vreg1 JNE_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use> Both copies are useless. This patch tries to eliminate the later copy in a generic manner. dec is especially confusing to LLVM when compared with sub. I wrote this patch to treat all physical registers generically, but only remove redundant copies of non-allocatable physical registers because the allocatable ones caused issues (e.g. when calling conventions weren't properly modeled) and should be handled later by the register allocator anyways. The following tests used to failed when the patch also replaced allocatable registers: CodeGen/X86/StackColoring.ll CodeGen/X86/avx512-calling-conv.ll CodeGen/X86/copy-propagation.ll CodeGen/X86/inline-asm-fpstack.ll CodeGen/X86/musttail-varargs.ll CodeGen/X86/pop-stack-cleanup.ll CodeGen/X86/preserve_mostcc64.ll CodeGen/X86/tailcallstack64.ll CodeGen/X86/this-return-64.ll This happens because COPY has other special meaning for e.g. dependency breakage and x87 FP stack. Note that all other backends' tests pass. Reviewers: qcolombet Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15157 llvm-svn: 254665
2015-12-04 07:43:56 +08:00
if (DisableNAPhysCopyOpt)
return false;
unsigned DstReg = MI.getOperand(0).getReg();
unsigned SrcReg = MI.getOperand(1).getReg();
CodeGen peephole: fold redundant phys reg copies Code generation often exposes redundant physical register copies through virtual registers such as: %vreg = COPY %PHYSREG ... %PHYSREG = COPY %vreg There are cases where no intervening clobber of %PHYSREG occurs, and the later copy could therefore be removed. In some cases this further allows us to remove the initial copy. This patch contains a motivating example which comes from the x86 build of Chrome, specifically cc::ResourceProvider::UnlockForRead uses libstdc++'s implementation of hash_map. That example has two tests live at the same time, and after machine sinking LLVM has confused itself enough and things spilling EFLAGS is a great idea even though it's never restored and the comparison results are both live. Before this patch we have: DEC32m %RIP, 1, %noreg, <ga:@L>, %noreg, %EFLAGS<imp-def> %vreg1<def> = COPY %EFLAGS; GR64:%vreg1 %EFLAGS<def> = COPY %vreg1; GR64:%vreg1 JNE_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use> Both copies are useless. This patch tries to eliminate the later copy in a generic manner. dec is especially confusing to LLVM when compared with sub. I wrote this patch to treat all physical registers generically, but only remove redundant copies of non-allocatable physical registers because the allocatable ones caused issues (e.g. when calling conventions weren't properly modeled) and should be handled later by the register allocator anyways. The following tests used to failed when the patch also replaced allocatable registers: CodeGen/X86/StackColoring.ll CodeGen/X86/avx512-calling-conv.ll CodeGen/X86/copy-propagation.ll CodeGen/X86/inline-asm-fpstack.ll CodeGen/X86/musttail-varargs.ll CodeGen/X86/pop-stack-cleanup.ll CodeGen/X86/preserve_mostcc64.ll CodeGen/X86/tailcallstack64.ll CodeGen/X86/this-return-64.ll This happens because COPY has other special meaning for e.g. dependency breakage and x87 FP stack. Note that all other backends' tests pass. Reviewers: qcolombet Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15157 llvm-svn: 254665
2015-12-04 07:43:56 +08:00
if (isNAPhysCopy(SrcReg) && TargetRegisterInfo::isVirtualRegister(DstReg)) {
// %vreg = COPY %physreg
CodeGen peephole: fold redundant phys reg copies Code generation often exposes redundant physical register copies through virtual registers such as: %vreg = COPY %PHYSREG ... %PHYSREG = COPY %vreg There are cases where no intervening clobber of %PHYSREG occurs, and the later copy could therefore be removed. In some cases this further allows us to remove the initial copy. This patch contains a motivating example which comes from the x86 build of Chrome, specifically cc::ResourceProvider::UnlockForRead uses libstdc++'s implementation of hash_map. That example has two tests live at the same time, and after machine sinking LLVM has confused itself enough and things spilling EFLAGS is a great idea even though it's never restored and the comparison results are both live. Before this patch we have: DEC32m %RIP, 1, %noreg, <ga:@L>, %noreg, %EFLAGS<imp-def> %vreg1<def> = COPY %EFLAGS; GR64:%vreg1 %EFLAGS<def> = COPY %vreg1; GR64:%vreg1 JNE_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use> Both copies are useless. This patch tries to eliminate the later copy in a generic manner. dec is especially confusing to LLVM when compared with sub. I wrote this patch to treat all physical registers generically, but only remove redundant copies of non-allocatable physical registers because the allocatable ones caused issues (e.g. when calling conventions weren't properly modeled) and should be handled later by the register allocator anyways. The following tests used to failed when the patch also replaced allocatable registers: CodeGen/X86/StackColoring.ll CodeGen/X86/avx512-calling-conv.ll CodeGen/X86/copy-propagation.ll CodeGen/X86/inline-asm-fpstack.ll CodeGen/X86/musttail-varargs.ll CodeGen/X86/pop-stack-cleanup.ll CodeGen/X86/preserve_mostcc64.ll CodeGen/X86/tailcallstack64.ll CodeGen/X86/this-return-64.ll This happens because COPY has other special meaning for e.g. dependency breakage and x87 FP stack. Note that all other backends' tests pass. Reviewers: qcolombet Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15157 llvm-svn: 254665
2015-12-04 07:43:56 +08:00
// Avoid using a datastructure which can track multiple live non-allocatable
// phys->virt copies since LLVM doesn't seem to do this.
NAPhysToVirtMIs.insert({SrcReg, &MI});
CodeGen peephole: fold redundant phys reg copies Code generation often exposes redundant physical register copies through virtual registers such as: %vreg = COPY %PHYSREG ... %PHYSREG = COPY %vreg There are cases where no intervening clobber of %PHYSREG occurs, and the later copy could therefore be removed. In some cases this further allows us to remove the initial copy. This patch contains a motivating example which comes from the x86 build of Chrome, specifically cc::ResourceProvider::UnlockForRead uses libstdc++'s implementation of hash_map. That example has two tests live at the same time, and after machine sinking LLVM has confused itself enough and things spilling EFLAGS is a great idea even though it's never restored and the comparison results are both live. Before this patch we have: DEC32m %RIP, 1, %noreg, <ga:@L>, %noreg, %EFLAGS<imp-def> %vreg1<def> = COPY %EFLAGS; GR64:%vreg1 %EFLAGS<def> = COPY %vreg1; GR64:%vreg1 JNE_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use> Both copies are useless. This patch tries to eliminate the later copy in a generic manner. dec is especially confusing to LLVM when compared with sub. I wrote this patch to treat all physical registers generically, but only remove redundant copies of non-allocatable physical registers because the allocatable ones caused issues (e.g. when calling conventions weren't properly modeled) and should be handled later by the register allocator anyways. The following tests used to failed when the patch also replaced allocatable registers: CodeGen/X86/StackColoring.ll CodeGen/X86/avx512-calling-conv.ll CodeGen/X86/copy-propagation.ll CodeGen/X86/inline-asm-fpstack.ll CodeGen/X86/musttail-varargs.ll CodeGen/X86/pop-stack-cleanup.ll CodeGen/X86/preserve_mostcc64.ll CodeGen/X86/tailcallstack64.ll CodeGen/X86/this-return-64.ll This happens because COPY has other special meaning for e.g. dependency breakage and x87 FP stack. Note that all other backends' tests pass. Reviewers: qcolombet Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15157 llvm-svn: 254665
2015-12-04 07:43:56 +08:00
return false;
}
if (!(TargetRegisterInfo::isVirtualRegister(SrcReg) && isNAPhysCopy(DstReg)))
return false;
// %physreg = COPY %vreg
CodeGen peephole: fold redundant phys reg copies Code generation often exposes redundant physical register copies through virtual registers such as: %vreg = COPY %PHYSREG ... %PHYSREG = COPY %vreg There are cases where no intervening clobber of %PHYSREG occurs, and the later copy could therefore be removed. In some cases this further allows us to remove the initial copy. This patch contains a motivating example which comes from the x86 build of Chrome, specifically cc::ResourceProvider::UnlockForRead uses libstdc++'s implementation of hash_map. That example has two tests live at the same time, and after machine sinking LLVM has confused itself enough and things spilling EFLAGS is a great idea even though it's never restored and the comparison results are both live. Before this patch we have: DEC32m %RIP, 1, %noreg, <ga:@L>, %noreg, %EFLAGS<imp-def> %vreg1<def> = COPY %EFLAGS; GR64:%vreg1 %EFLAGS<def> = COPY %vreg1; GR64:%vreg1 JNE_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use> Both copies are useless. This patch tries to eliminate the later copy in a generic manner. dec is especially confusing to LLVM when compared with sub. I wrote this patch to treat all physical registers generically, but only remove redundant copies of non-allocatable physical registers because the allocatable ones caused issues (e.g. when calling conventions weren't properly modeled) and should be handled later by the register allocator anyways. The following tests used to failed when the patch also replaced allocatable registers: CodeGen/X86/StackColoring.ll CodeGen/X86/avx512-calling-conv.ll CodeGen/X86/copy-propagation.ll CodeGen/X86/inline-asm-fpstack.ll CodeGen/X86/musttail-varargs.ll CodeGen/X86/pop-stack-cleanup.ll CodeGen/X86/preserve_mostcc64.ll CodeGen/X86/tailcallstack64.ll CodeGen/X86/this-return-64.ll This happens because COPY has other special meaning for e.g. dependency breakage and x87 FP stack. Note that all other backends' tests pass. Reviewers: qcolombet Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15157 llvm-svn: 254665
2015-12-04 07:43:56 +08:00
auto PrevCopy = NAPhysToVirtMIs.find(DstReg);
if (PrevCopy == NAPhysToVirtMIs.end()) {
// We can't remove the copy: there was an intervening clobber of the
// non-allocatable physical register after the copy to virtual.
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "NAPhysCopy: intervening clobber forbids erasing "
<< MI);
CodeGen peephole: fold redundant phys reg copies Code generation often exposes redundant physical register copies through virtual registers such as: %vreg = COPY %PHYSREG ... %PHYSREG = COPY %vreg There are cases where no intervening clobber of %PHYSREG occurs, and the later copy could therefore be removed. In some cases this further allows us to remove the initial copy. This patch contains a motivating example which comes from the x86 build of Chrome, specifically cc::ResourceProvider::UnlockForRead uses libstdc++'s implementation of hash_map. That example has two tests live at the same time, and after machine sinking LLVM has confused itself enough and things spilling EFLAGS is a great idea even though it's never restored and the comparison results are both live. Before this patch we have: DEC32m %RIP, 1, %noreg, <ga:@L>, %noreg, %EFLAGS<imp-def> %vreg1<def> = COPY %EFLAGS; GR64:%vreg1 %EFLAGS<def> = COPY %vreg1; GR64:%vreg1 JNE_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use> Both copies are useless. This patch tries to eliminate the later copy in a generic manner. dec is especially confusing to LLVM when compared with sub. I wrote this patch to treat all physical registers generically, but only remove redundant copies of non-allocatable physical registers because the allocatable ones caused issues (e.g. when calling conventions weren't properly modeled) and should be handled later by the register allocator anyways. The following tests used to failed when the patch also replaced allocatable registers: CodeGen/X86/StackColoring.ll CodeGen/X86/avx512-calling-conv.ll CodeGen/X86/copy-propagation.ll CodeGen/X86/inline-asm-fpstack.ll CodeGen/X86/musttail-varargs.ll CodeGen/X86/pop-stack-cleanup.ll CodeGen/X86/preserve_mostcc64.ll CodeGen/X86/tailcallstack64.ll CodeGen/X86/this-return-64.ll This happens because COPY has other special meaning for e.g. dependency breakage and x87 FP stack. Note that all other backends' tests pass. Reviewers: qcolombet Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15157 llvm-svn: 254665
2015-12-04 07:43:56 +08:00
return false;
}
unsigned PrevDstReg = PrevCopy->second->getOperand(0).getReg();
if (PrevDstReg == SrcReg) {
// Remove the virt->phys copy: we saw the virtual register definition, and
// the non-allocatable physical register's state hasn't changed since then.
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "NAPhysCopy: erasing " << MI);
CodeGen peephole: fold redundant phys reg copies Code generation often exposes redundant physical register copies through virtual registers such as: %vreg = COPY %PHYSREG ... %PHYSREG = COPY %vreg There are cases where no intervening clobber of %PHYSREG occurs, and the later copy could therefore be removed. In some cases this further allows us to remove the initial copy. This patch contains a motivating example which comes from the x86 build of Chrome, specifically cc::ResourceProvider::UnlockForRead uses libstdc++'s implementation of hash_map. That example has two tests live at the same time, and after machine sinking LLVM has confused itself enough and things spilling EFLAGS is a great idea even though it's never restored and the comparison results are both live. Before this patch we have: DEC32m %RIP, 1, %noreg, <ga:@L>, %noreg, %EFLAGS<imp-def> %vreg1<def> = COPY %EFLAGS; GR64:%vreg1 %EFLAGS<def> = COPY %vreg1; GR64:%vreg1 JNE_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use> Both copies are useless. This patch tries to eliminate the later copy in a generic manner. dec is especially confusing to LLVM when compared with sub. I wrote this patch to treat all physical registers generically, but only remove redundant copies of non-allocatable physical registers because the allocatable ones caused issues (e.g. when calling conventions weren't properly modeled) and should be handled later by the register allocator anyways. The following tests used to failed when the patch also replaced allocatable registers: CodeGen/X86/StackColoring.ll CodeGen/X86/avx512-calling-conv.ll CodeGen/X86/copy-propagation.ll CodeGen/X86/inline-asm-fpstack.ll CodeGen/X86/musttail-varargs.ll CodeGen/X86/pop-stack-cleanup.ll CodeGen/X86/preserve_mostcc64.ll CodeGen/X86/tailcallstack64.ll CodeGen/X86/this-return-64.ll This happens because COPY has other special meaning for e.g. dependency breakage and x87 FP stack. Note that all other backends' tests pass. Reviewers: qcolombet Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15157 llvm-svn: 254665
2015-12-04 07:43:56 +08:00
++NumNAPhysCopies;
return true;
}
// Potential missed optimization opportunity: we saw a different virtual
// register get a copy of the non-allocatable physical register, and we only
// track one such copy. Avoid getting confused by this new non-allocatable
// physical register definition, and remove it from the tracked copies.
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "NAPhysCopy: missed opportunity " << MI);
CodeGen peephole: fold redundant phys reg copies Code generation often exposes redundant physical register copies through virtual registers such as: %vreg = COPY %PHYSREG ... %PHYSREG = COPY %vreg There are cases where no intervening clobber of %PHYSREG occurs, and the later copy could therefore be removed. In some cases this further allows us to remove the initial copy. This patch contains a motivating example which comes from the x86 build of Chrome, specifically cc::ResourceProvider::UnlockForRead uses libstdc++'s implementation of hash_map. That example has two tests live at the same time, and after machine sinking LLVM has confused itself enough and things spilling EFLAGS is a great idea even though it's never restored and the comparison results are both live. Before this patch we have: DEC32m %RIP, 1, %noreg, <ga:@L>, %noreg, %EFLAGS<imp-def> %vreg1<def> = COPY %EFLAGS; GR64:%vreg1 %EFLAGS<def> = COPY %vreg1; GR64:%vreg1 JNE_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use> Both copies are useless. This patch tries to eliminate the later copy in a generic manner. dec is especially confusing to LLVM when compared with sub. I wrote this patch to treat all physical registers generically, but only remove redundant copies of non-allocatable physical registers because the allocatable ones caused issues (e.g. when calling conventions weren't properly modeled) and should be handled later by the register allocator anyways. The following tests used to failed when the patch also replaced allocatable registers: CodeGen/X86/StackColoring.ll CodeGen/X86/avx512-calling-conv.ll CodeGen/X86/copy-propagation.ll CodeGen/X86/inline-asm-fpstack.ll CodeGen/X86/musttail-varargs.ll CodeGen/X86/pop-stack-cleanup.ll CodeGen/X86/preserve_mostcc64.ll CodeGen/X86/tailcallstack64.ll CodeGen/X86/this-return-64.ll This happens because COPY has other special meaning for e.g. dependency breakage and x87 FP stack. Note that all other backends' tests pass. Reviewers: qcolombet Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15157 llvm-svn: 254665
2015-12-04 07:43:56 +08:00
NAPhysToVirtMIs.erase(PrevCopy);
return false;
}
Remove redundant copy in recurrences Summary: If there is a chain of instructions formulating a recurrence, commuting operands can help removing a redundant copy. In the following example code, ``` BB#1: ; Loop Header %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: ; Loop Latch %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg1<kill,tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1,%vreg0 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg2<kill,tied0>, %vreg10<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2,%vreg10 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> ``` Existing two-address generation pass generates following code: ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg1<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` This is suboptimal because the assembly code generated has a redundant copy at the end of #BB6 to feed %vreg13 to BB#1: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %esi, %edi addl %ebx, %edi cmpl $10, %edi movl %edi, %esi jl .LBB0_1 ``` This redundant copy can be elimiated by making instructions in the recurrence chain to compute the value "into" the register that actually holds the feedback value. In this example, this can be achieved by commuting %vreg0 and %vreg1 to compute %vreg10. With that change, code after two-address generation becomes ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: derived from LLVM BB %bb7 Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg0<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg1<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` and the final assembly does not have redundant copy: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %edi, %eax addl %ebx, %eax cmpl $10, %eax jl .LBB0_1 ``` Reviewers: qcolombet, MatzeB, wmi Reviewed By: wmi Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31821 llvm-svn: 306758
2017-06-30 07:11:24 +08:00
/// \bried Returns true if \p MO is a virtual register operand.
static bool isVirtualRegisterOperand(MachineOperand &MO) {
if (!MO.isReg())
return false;
return TargetRegisterInfo::isVirtualRegister(MO.getReg());
}
bool PeepholeOptimizer::findTargetRecurrence(
unsigned Reg, const SmallSet<unsigned, 2> &TargetRegs,
RecurrenceCycle &RC) {
// Recurrence found if Reg is in TargetRegs.
if (TargetRegs.count(Reg))
return true;
// TODO: Curerntly, we only allow the last instruction of the recurrence
// cycle (the instruction that feeds the PHI instruction) to have more than
// one uses to guarantee that commuting operands does not tie registers
// with overlapping live range. Once we have actual live range info of
// each register, this constraint can be relaxed.
if (!MRI->hasOneNonDBGUse(Reg))
return false;
// Give up if the reccurrence chain length is longer than the limit.
if (RC.size() >= MaxRecurrenceChain)
return false;
MachineInstr &MI = *(MRI->use_instr_nodbg_begin(Reg));
unsigned Idx = MI.findRegisterUseOperandIdx(Reg);
// Only interested in recurrences whose instructions have only one def, which
// is a virtual register.
if (MI.getDesc().getNumDefs() != 1)
return false;
MachineOperand &DefOp = MI.getOperand(0);
if (!isVirtualRegisterOperand(DefOp))
return false;
// Check if def operand of MI is tied to any use operand. We are only
// interested in the case that all the instructions in the recurrence chain
// have there def operand tied with one of the use operand.
unsigned TiedUseIdx;
if (!MI.isRegTiedToUseOperand(0, &TiedUseIdx))
return false;
if (Idx == TiedUseIdx) {
RC.push_back(RecurrenceInstr(&MI));
return findTargetRecurrence(DefOp.getReg(), TargetRegs, RC);
} else {
// If Idx is not TiedUseIdx, check if Idx is commutable with TiedUseIdx.
unsigned CommIdx = TargetInstrInfo::CommuteAnyOperandIndex;
if (TII->findCommutedOpIndices(MI, Idx, CommIdx) && CommIdx == TiedUseIdx) {
RC.push_back(RecurrenceInstr(&MI, Idx, CommIdx));
return findTargetRecurrence(DefOp.getReg(), TargetRegs, RC);
}
}
return false;
}
/// Phi instructions will eventually be lowered to copy instructions.
/// If phi is in a loop header, a recurrence may formulated around the source
/// and destination of the phi. For such case commuting operands of the
/// instructions in the recurrence may enable coalescing of the copy instruction
/// generated from the phi. For example, if there is a recurrence of
Remove redundant copy in recurrences Summary: If there is a chain of instructions formulating a recurrence, commuting operands can help removing a redundant copy. In the following example code, ``` BB#1: ; Loop Header %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: ; Loop Latch %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg1<kill,tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1,%vreg0 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg2<kill,tied0>, %vreg10<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2,%vreg10 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> ``` Existing two-address generation pass generates following code: ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg1<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` This is suboptimal because the assembly code generated has a redundant copy at the end of #BB6 to feed %vreg13 to BB#1: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %esi, %edi addl %ebx, %edi cmpl $10, %edi movl %edi, %esi jl .LBB0_1 ``` This redundant copy can be elimiated by making instructions in the recurrence chain to compute the value "into" the register that actually holds the feedback value. In this example, this can be achieved by commuting %vreg0 and %vreg1 to compute %vreg10. With that change, code after two-address generation becomes ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: derived from LLVM BB %bb7 Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg0<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg1<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` and the final assembly does not have redundant copy: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %edi, %eax addl %ebx, %eax cmpl $10, %eax jl .LBB0_1 ``` Reviewers: qcolombet, MatzeB, wmi Reviewed By: wmi Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31821 llvm-svn: 306758
2017-06-30 07:11:24 +08:00
///
/// LoopHeader:
/// %1 = phi(%0, %100)
Remove redundant copy in recurrences Summary: If there is a chain of instructions formulating a recurrence, commuting operands can help removing a redundant copy. In the following example code, ``` BB#1: ; Loop Header %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: ; Loop Latch %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg1<kill,tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1,%vreg0 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg2<kill,tied0>, %vreg10<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2,%vreg10 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> ``` Existing two-address generation pass generates following code: ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg1<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` This is suboptimal because the assembly code generated has a redundant copy at the end of #BB6 to feed %vreg13 to BB#1: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %esi, %edi addl %ebx, %edi cmpl $10, %edi movl %edi, %esi jl .LBB0_1 ``` This redundant copy can be elimiated by making instructions in the recurrence chain to compute the value "into" the register that actually holds the feedback value. In this example, this can be achieved by commuting %vreg0 and %vreg1 to compute %vreg10. With that change, code after two-address generation becomes ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: derived from LLVM BB %bb7 Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg0<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg1<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` and the final assembly does not have redundant copy: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %edi, %eax addl %ebx, %eax cmpl $10, %eax jl .LBB0_1 ``` Reviewers: qcolombet, MatzeB, wmi Reviewed By: wmi Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31821 llvm-svn: 306758
2017-06-30 07:11:24 +08:00
/// LoopLatch:
/// %0<def, tied1> = ADD %2<def, tied0>, %1
Remove redundant copy in recurrences Summary: If there is a chain of instructions formulating a recurrence, commuting operands can help removing a redundant copy. In the following example code, ``` BB#1: ; Loop Header %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: ; Loop Latch %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg1<kill,tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1,%vreg0 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg2<kill,tied0>, %vreg10<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2,%vreg10 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> ``` Existing two-address generation pass generates following code: ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg1<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` This is suboptimal because the assembly code generated has a redundant copy at the end of #BB6 to feed %vreg13 to BB#1: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %esi, %edi addl %ebx, %edi cmpl $10, %edi movl %edi, %esi jl .LBB0_1 ``` This redundant copy can be elimiated by making instructions in the recurrence chain to compute the value "into" the register that actually holds the feedback value. In this example, this can be achieved by commuting %vreg0 and %vreg1 to compute %vreg10. With that change, code after two-address generation becomes ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: derived from LLVM BB %bb7 Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg0<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg1<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` and the final assembly does not have redundant copy: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %edi, %eax addl %ebx, %eax cmpl $10, %eax jl .LBB0_1 ``` Reviewers: qcolombet, MatzeB, wmi Reviewed By: wmi Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31821 llvm-svn: 306758
2017-06-30 07:11:24 +08:00
///
/// , the fact that %0 and %2 are in the same tied operands set makes
Remove redundant copy in recurrences Summary: If there is a chain of instructions formulating a recurrence, commuting operands can help removing a redundant copy. In the following example code, ``` BB#1: ; Loop Header %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: ; Loop Latch %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg1<kill,tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1,%vreg0 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg2<kill,tied0>, %vreg10<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2,%vreg10 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> ``` Existing two-address generation pass generates following code: ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg1<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` This is suboptimal because the assembly code generated has a redundant copy at the end of #BB6 to feed %vreg13 to BB#1: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %esi, %edi addl %ebx, %edi cmpl $10, %edi movl %edi, %esi jl .LBB0_1 ``` This redundant copy can be elimiated by making instructions in the recurrence chain to compute the value "into" the register that actually holds the feedback value. In this example, this can be achieved by commuting %vreg0 and %vreg1 to compute %vreg10. With that change, code after two-address generation becomes ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: derived from LLVM BB %bb7 Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg0<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg1<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` and the final assembly does not have redundant copy: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %edi, %eax addl %ebx, %eax cmpl $10, %eax jl .LBB0_1 ``` Reviewers: qcolombet, MatzeB, wmi Reviewed By: wmi Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31821 llvm-svn: 306758
2017-06-30 07:11:24 +08:00
/// the coalescing of copy instruction generated from the phi in
/// LoopHeader(i.e. %1 = COPY %0) impossible, because %1 and
/// %2 have overlapping live range. This introduces additional move
/// instruction to the final assembly. However, if we commute %2 and
/// %1 of ADD instruction, the redundant move instruction can be
Remove redundant copy in recurrences Summary: If there is a chain of instructions formulating a recurrence, commuting operands can help removing a redundant copy. In the following example code, ``` BB#1: ; Loop Header %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: ; Loop Latch %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg1<kill,tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1,%vreg0 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg2<kill,tied0>, %vreg10<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2,%vreg10 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> ``` Existing two-address generation pass generates following code: ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg1<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` This is suboptimal because the assembly code generated has a redundant copy at the end of #BB6 to feed %vreg13 to BB#1: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %esi, %edi addl %ebx, %edi cmpl $10, %edi movl %edi, %esi jl .LBB0_1 ``` This redundant copy can be elimiated by making instructions in the recurrence chain to compute the value "into" the register that actually holds the feedback value. In this example, this can be achieved by commuting %vreg0 and %vreg1 to compute %vreg10. With that change, code after two-address generation becomes ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: derived from LLVM BB %bb7 Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg0<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg1<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` and the final assembly does not have redundant copy: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %edi, %eax addl %ebx, %eax cmpl $10, %eax jl .LBB0_1 ``` Reviewers: qcolombet, MatzeB, wmi Reviewed By: wmi Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31821 llvm-svn: 306758
2017-06-30 07:11:24 +08:00
/// avoided.
bool PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeRecurrence(MachineInstr &PHI) {
SmallSet<unsigned, 2> TargetRegs;
for (unsigned Idx = 1; Idx < PHI.getNumOperands(); Idx += 2) {
MachineOperand &MO = PHI.getOperand(Idx);
assert(isVirtualRegisterOperand(MO) && "Invalid PHI instruction");
TargetRegs.insert(MO.getReg());
}
bool Changed = false;
RecurrenceCycle RC;
if (findTargetRecurrence(PHI.getOperand(0).getReg(), TargetRegs, RC)) {
// Commutes operands of instructions in RC if necessary so that the copy to
// be generated from PHI can be coalesced.
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Optimize recurrence chain from " << PHI);
Remove redundant copy in recurrences Summary: If there is a chain of instructions formulating a recurrence, commuting operands can help removing a redundant copy. In the following example code, ``` BB#1: ; Loop Header %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: ; Loop Latch %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg1<kill,tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1,%vreg0 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg2<kill,tied0>, %vreg10<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2,%vreg10 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> ``` Existing two-address generation pass generates following code: ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg1<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` This is suboptimal because the assembly code generated has a redundant copy at the end of #BB6 to feed %vreg13 to BB#1: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %esi, %edi addl %ebx, %edi cmpl $10, %edi movl %edi, %esi jl .LBB0_1 ``` This redundant copy can be elimiated by making instructions in the recurrence chain to compute the value "into" the register that actually holds the feedback value. In this example, this can be achieved by commuting %vreg0 and %vreg1 to compute %vreg10. With that change, code after two-address generation becomes ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: derived from LLVM BB %bb7 Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg0<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg1<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` and the final assembly does not have redundant copy: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %edi, %eax addl %ebx, %eax cmpl $10, %eax jl .LBB0_1 ``` Reviewers: qcolombet, MatzeB, wmi Reviewed By: wmi Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31821 llvm-svn: 306758
2017-06-30 07:11:24 +08:00
for (auto &RI : RC) {
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "\tInst: " << *(RI.getMI()));
Remove redundant copy in recurrences Summary: If there is a chain of instructions formulating a recurrence, commuting operands can help removing a redundant copy. In the following example code, ``` BB#1: ; Loop Header %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: ; Loop Latch %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg1<kill,tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1,%vreg0 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg2<kill,tied0>, %vreg10<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2,%vreg10 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> ``` Existing two-address generation pass generates following code: ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg1<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` This is suboptimal because the assembly code generated has a redundant copy at the end of #BB6 to feed %vreg13 to BB#1: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %esi, %edi addl %ebx, %edi cmpl $10, %edi movl %edi, %esi jl .LBB0_1 ``` This redundant copy can be elimiated by making instructions in the recurrence chain to compute the value "into" the register that actually holds the feedback value. In this example, this can be achieved by commuting %vreg0 and %vreg1 to compute %vreg10. With that change, code after two-address generation becomes ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: derived from LLVM BB %bb7 Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg0<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg1<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` and the final assembly does not have redundant copy: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %edi, %eax addl %ebx, %eax cmpl $10, %eax jl .LBB0_1 ``` Reviewers: qcolombet, MatzeB, wmi Reviewed By: wmi Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31821 llvm-svn: 306758
2017-06-30 07:11:24 +08:00
auto CP = RI.getCommutePair();
if (CP) {
Changed = true;
TII->commuteInstruction(*(RI.getMI()), false, (*CP).first,
(*CP).second);
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "\t\tCommuted: " << *(RI.getMI()));
Remove redundant copy in recurrences Summary: If there is a chain of instructions formulating a recurrence, commuting operands can help removing a redundant copy. In the following example code, ``` BB#1: ; Loop Header %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: ; Loop Latch %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg1<kill,tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1,%vreg0 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg2<kill,tied0>, %vreg10<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2,%vreg10 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> ``` Existing two-address generation pass generates following code: ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg1<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` This is suboptimal because the assembly code generated has a redundant copy at the end of #BB6 to feed %vreg13 to BB#1: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %esi, %edi addl %ebx, %edi cmpl $10, %edi movl %edi, %esi jl .LBB0_1 ``` This redundant copy can be elimiated by making instructions in the recurrence chain to compute the value "into" the register that actually holds the feedback value. In this example, this can be achieved by commuting %vreg0 and %vreg1 to compute %vreg10. With that change, code after two-address generation becomes ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: derived from LLVM BB %bb7 Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg0<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg1<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` and the final assembly does not have redundant copy: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %edi, %eax addl %ebx, %eax cmpl $10, %eax jl .LBB0_1 ``` Reviewers: qcolombet, MatzeB, wmi Reviewed By: wmi Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31821 llvm-svn: 306758
2017-06-30 07:11:24 +08:00
}
}
}
return Changed;
}
bool PeepholeOptimizer::runOnMachineFunction(MachineFunction &MF) {
if (skipFunction(MF.getFunction()))
return false;
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "********** PEEPHOLE OPTIMIZER **********\n");
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "********** Function: " << MF.getName() << '\n');
if (DisablePeephole)
return false;
2012-02-09 05:22:43 +08:00
TII = MF.getSubtarget().getInstrInfo();
TRI = MF.getSubtarget().getRegisterInfo();
MRI = &MF.getRegInfo();
DT = Aggressive ? &getAnalysis<MachineDominatorTree>() : nullptr;
Remove redundant copy in recurrences Summary: If there is a chain of instructions formulating a recurrence, commuting operands can help removing a redundant copy. In the following example code, ``` BB#1: ; Loop Header %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: ; Loop Latch %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg1<kill,tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1,%vreg0 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg2<kill,tied0>, %vreg10<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2,%vreg10 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> ``` Existing two-address generation pass generates following code: ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg1<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` This is suboptimal because the assembly code generated has a redundant copy at the end of #BB6 to feed %vreg13 to BB#1: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %esi, %edi addl %ebx, %edi cmpl $10, %edi movl %edi, %esi jl .LBB0_1 ``` This redundant copy can be elimiated by making instructions in the recurrence chain to compute the value "into" the register that actually holds the feedback value. In this example, this can be achieved by commuting %vreg0 and %vreg1 to compute %vreg10. With that change, code after two-address generation becomes ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: derived from LLVM BB %bb7 Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg0<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg1<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` and the final assembly does not have redundant copy: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %edi, %eax addl %ebx, %eax cmpl $10, %eax jl .LBB0_1 ``` Reviewers: qcolombet, MatzeB, wmi Reviewed By: wmi Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31821 llvm-svn: 306758
2017-06-30 07:11:24 +08:00
MLI = &getAnalysis<MachineLoopInfo>();
bool Changed = false;
for (MachineBasicBlock &MBB : MF) {
bool SeenMoveImm = false;
// During this forward scan, at some point it needs to answer the question
// "given a pointer to an MI in the current BB, is it located before or
// after the current instruction".
// To perform this, the following set keeps track of the MIs already seen
// during the scan, if a MI is not in the set, it is assumed to be located
// after. Newly created MIs have to be inserted in the set as well.
SmallPtrSet<MachineInstr*, 16> LocalMIs;
SmallSet<unsigned, 4> ImmDefRegs;
DenseMap<unsigned, MachineInstr*> ImmDefMIs;
SmallSet<unsigned, 16> FoldAsLoadDefCandidates;
CodeGen peephole: fold redundant phys reg copies Code generation often exposes redundant physical register copies through virtual registers such as: %vreg = COPY %PHYSREG ... %PHYSREG = COPY %vreg There are cases where no intervening clobber of %PHYSREG occurs, and the later copy could therefore be removed. In some cases this further allows us to remove the initial copy. This patch contains a motivating example which comes from the x86 build of Chrome, specifically cc::ResourceProvider::UnlockForRead uses libstdc++'s implementation of hash_map. That example has two tests live at the same time, and after machine sinking LLVM has confused itself enough and things spilling EFLAGS is a great idea even though it's never restored and the comparison results are both live. Before this patch we have: DEC32m %RIP, 1, %noreg, <ga:@L>, %noreg, %EFLAGS<imp-def> %vreg1<def> = COPY %EFLAGS; GR64:%vreg1 %EFLAGS<def> = COPY %vreg1; GR64:%vreg1 JNE_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use> Both copies are useless. This patch tries to eliminate the later copy in a generic manner. dec is especially confusing to LLVM when compared with sub. I wrote this patch to treat all physical registers generically, but only remove redundant copies of non-allocatable physical registers because the allocatable ones caused issues (e.g. when calling conventions weren't properly modeled) and should be handled later by the register allocator anyways. The following tests used to failed when the patch also replaced allocatable registers: CodeGen/X86/StackColoring.ll CodeGen/X86/avx512-calling-conv.ll CodeGen/X86/copy-propagation.ll CodeGen/X86/inline-asm-fpstack.ll CodeGen/X86/musttail-varargs.ll CodeGen/X86/pop-stack-cleanup.ll CodeGen/X86/preserve_mostcc64.ll CodeGen/X86/tailcallstack64.ll CodeGen/X86/this-return-64.ll This happens because COPY has other special meaning for e.g. dependency breakage and x87 FP stack. Note that all other backends' tests pass. Reviewers: qcolombet Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15157 llvm-svn: 254665
2015-12-04 07:43:56 +08:00
// Track when a non-allocatable physical register is copied to a virtual
// register so that useless moves can be removed.
//
// %physreg is the map index; MI is the last valid `%vreg = COPY %physreg`
// without any intervening re-definition of %physreg.
CodeGen peephole: fold redundant phys reg copies Code generation often exposes redundant physical register copies through virtual registers such as: %vreg = COPY %PHYSREG ... %PHYSREG = COPY %vreg There are cases where no intervening clobber of %PHYSREG occurs, and the later copy could therefore be removed. In some cases this further allows us to remove the initial copy. This patch contains a motivating example which comes from the x86 build of Chrome, specifically cc::ResourceProvider::UnlockForRead uses libstdc++'s implementation of hash_map. That example has two tests live at the same time, and after machine sinking LLVM has confused itself enough and things spilling EFLAGS is a great idea even though it's never restored and the comparison results are both live. Before this patch we have: DEC32m %RIP, 1, %noreg, <ga:@L>, %noreg, %EFLAGS<imp-def> %vreg1<def> = COPY %EFLAGS; GR64:%vreg1 %EFLAGS<def> = COPY %vreg1; GR64:%vreg1 JNE_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use> Both copies are useless. This patch tries to eliminate the later copy in a generic manner. dec is especially confusing to LLVM when compared with sub. I wrote this patch to treat all physical registers generically, but only remove redundant copies of non-allocatable physical registers because the allocatable ones caused issues (e.g. when calling conventions weren't properly modeled) and should be handled later by the register allocator anyways. The following tests used to failed when the patch also replaced allocatable registers: CodeGen/X86/StackColoring.ll CodeGen/X86/avx512-calling-conv.ll CodeGen/X86/copy-propagation.ll CodeGen/X86/inline-asm-fpstack.ll CodeGen/X86/musttail-varargs.ll CodeGen/X86/pop-stack-cleanup.ll CodeGen/X86/preserve_mostcc64.ll CodeGen/X86/tailcallstack64.ll CodeGen/X86/this-return-64.ll This happens because COPY has other special meaning for e.g. dependency breakage and x87 FP stack. Note that all other backends' tests pass. Reviewers: qcolombet Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15157 llvm-svn: 254665
2015-12-04 07:43:56 +08:00
DenseMap<unsigned, MachineInstr *> NAPhysToVirtMIs;
// Set of virtual registers that are copied from.
SmallSet<unsigned, 4> CopySrcRegs;
DenseMap<unsigned, MachineInstr *> CopySrcMIs;
Remove redundant copy in recurrences Summary: If there is a chain of instructions formulating a recurrence, commuting operands can help removing a redundant copy. In the following example code, ``` BB#1: ; Loop Header %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: ; Loop Latch %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg1<kill,tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1,%vreg0 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg2<kill,tied0>, %vreg10<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2,%vreg10 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> ``` Existing two-address generation pass generates following code: ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg1<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` This is suboptimal because the assembly code generated has a redundant copy at the end of #BB6 to feed %vreg13 to BB#1: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %esi, %edi addl %ebx, %edi cmpl $10, %edi movl %edi, %esi jl .LBB0_1 ``` This redundant copy can be elimiated by making instructions in the recurrence chain to compute the value "into" the register that actually holds the feedback value. In this example, this can be achieved by commuting %vreg0 and %vreg1 to compute %vreg10. With that change, code after two-address generation becomes ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: derived from LLVM BB %bb7 Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg0<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg1<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` and the final assembly does not have redundant copy: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %edi, %eax addl %ebx, %eax cmpl $10, %eax jl .LBB0_1 ``` Reviewers: qcolombet, MatzeB, wmi Reviewed By: wmi Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31821 llvm-svn: 306758
2017-06-30 07:11:24 +08:00
bool IsLoopHeader = MLI->isLoopHeader(&MBB);
for (MachineBasicBlock::iterator MII = MBB.begin(), MIE = MBB.end();
MII != MIE; ) {
MachineInstr *MI = &*MII;
// We may be erasing MI below, increment MII now.
++MII;
LocalMIs.insert(MI);
// Skip debug instructions. They should not affect this peephole optimization.
if (MI->isDebugInstr())
continue;
Remove redundant copy in recurrences Summary: If there is a chain of instructions formulating a recurrence, commuting operands can help removing a redundant copy. In the following example code, ``` BB#1: ; Loop Header %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: ; Loop Latch %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg1<kill,tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1,%vreg0 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg2<kill,tied0>, %vreg10<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2,%vreg10 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> ``` Existing two-address generation pass generates following code: ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg1<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` This is suboptimal because the assembly code generated has a redundant copy at the end of #BB6 to feed %vreg13 to BB#1: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %esi, %edi addl %ebx, %edi cmpl $10, %edi movl %edi, %esi jl .LBB0_1 ``` This redundant copy can be elimiated by making instructions in the recurrence chain to compute the value "into" the register that actually holds the feedback value. In this example, this can be achieved by commuting %vreg0 and %vreg1 to compute %vreg10. With that change, code after two-address generation becomes ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: derived from LLVM BB %bb7 Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg0<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg1<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` and the final assembly does not have redundant copy: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %edi, %eax addl %ebx, %eax cmpl $10, %eax jl .LBB0_1 ``` Reviewers: qcolombet, MatzeB, wmi Reviewed By: wmi Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31821 llvm-svn: 306758
2017-06-30 07:11:24 +08:00
if (MI->isPosition())
continue;
Remove redundant copy in recurrences Summary: If there is a chain of instructions formulating a recurrence, commuting operands can help removing a redundant copy. In the following example code, ``` BB#1: ; Loop Header %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: ; Loop Latch %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg1<kill,tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1,%vreg0 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg2<kill,tied0>, %vreg10<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2,%vreg10 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> ``` Existing two-address generation pass generates following code: ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg1<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` This is suboptimal because the assembly code generated has a redundant copy at the end of #BB6 to feed %vreg13 to BB#1: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %esi, %edi addl %ebx, %edi cmpl $10, %edi movl %edi, %esi jl .LBB0_1 ``` This redundant copy can be elimiated by making instructions in the recurrence chain to compute the value "into" the register that actually holds the feedback value. In this example, this can be achieved by commuting %vreg0 and %vreg1 to compute %vreg10. With that change, code after two-address generation becomes ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: derived from LLVM BB %bb7 Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg0<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg1<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` and the final assembly does not have redundant copy: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %edi, %eax addl %ebx, %eax cmpl $10, %eax jl .LBB0_1 ``` Reviewers: qcolombet, MatzeB, wmi Reviewed By: wmi Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31821 llvm-svn: 306758
2017-06-30 07:11:24 +08:00
if (IsLoopHeader && MI->isPHI()) {
if (optimizeRecurrence(*MI)) {
Changed = true;
continue;
}
}
CodeGen peephole: fold redundant phys reg copies Code generation often exposes redundant physical register copies through virtual registers such as: %vreg = COPY %PHYSREG ... %PHYSREG = COPY %vreg There are cases where no intervening clobber of %PHYSREG occurs, and the later copy could therefore be removed. In some cases this further allows us to remove the initial copy. This patch contains a motivating example which comes from the x86 build of Chrome, specifically cc::ResourceProvider::UnlockForRead uses libstdc++'s implementation of hash_map. That example has two tests live at the same time, and after machine sinking LLVM has confused itself enough and things spilling EFLAGS is a great idea even though it's never restored and the comparison results are both live. Before this patch we have: DEC32m %RIP, 1, %noreg, <ga:@L>, %noreg, %EFLAGS<imp-def> %vreg1<def> = COPY %EFLAGS; GR64:%vreg1 %EFLAGS<def> = COPY %vreg1; GR64:%vreg1 JNE_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use> Both copies are useless. This patch tries to eliminate the later copy in a generic manner. dec is especially confusing to LLVM when compared with sub. I wrote this patch to treat all physical registers generically, but only remove redundant copies of non-allocatable physical registers because the allocatable ones caused issues (e.g. when calling conventions weren't properly modeled) and should be handled later by the register allocator anyways. The following tests used to failed when the patch also replaced allocatable registers: CodeGen/X86/StackColoring.ll CodeGen/X86/avx512-calling-conv.ll CodeGen/X86/copy-propagation.ll CodeGen/X86/inline-asm-fpstack.ll CodeGen/X86/musttail-varargs.ll CodeGen/X86/pop-stack-cleanup.ll CodeGen/X86/preserve_mostcc64.ll CodeGen/X86/tailcallstack64.ll CodeGen/X86/this-return-64.ll This happens because COPY has other special meaning for e.g. dependency breakage and x87 FP stack. Note that all other backends' tests pass. Reviewers: qcolombet Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15157 llvm-svn: 254665
2015-12-04 07:43:56 +08:00
if (!MI->isCopy()) {
for (const MachineOperand &MO : MI->operands()) {
CodeGen peephole: fold redundant phys reg copies Code generation often exposes redundant physical register copies through virtual registers such as: %vreg = COPY %PHYSREG ... %PHYSREG = COPY %vreg There are cases where no intervening clobber of %PHYSREG occurs, and the later copy could therefore be removed. In some cases this further allows us to remove the initial copy. This patch contains a motivating example which comes from the x86 build of Chrome, specifically cc::ResourceProvider::UnlockForRead uses libstdc++'s implementation of hash_map. That example has two tests live at the same time, and after machine sinking LLVM has confused itself enough and things spilling EFLAGS is a great idea even though it's never restored and the comparison results are both live. Before this patch we have: DEC32m %RIP, 1, %noreg, <ga:@L>, %noreg, %EFLAGS<imp-def> %vreg1<def> = COPY %EFLAGS; GR64:%vreg1 %EFLAGS<def> = COPY %vreg1; GR64:%vreg1 JNE_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use> Both copies are useless. This patch tries to eliminate the later copy in a generic manner. dec is especially confusing to LLVM when compared with sub. I wrote this patch to treat all physical registers generically, but only remove redundant copies of non-allocatable physical registers because the allocatable ones caused issues (e.g. when calling conventions weren't properly modeled) and should be handled later by the register allocator anyways. The following tests used to failed when the patch also replaced allocatable registers: CodeGen/X86/StackColoring.ll CodeGen/X86/avx512-calling-conv.ll CodeGen/X86/copy-propagation.ll CodeGen/X86/inline-asm-fpstack.ll CodeGen/X86/musttail-varargs.ll CodeGen/X86/pop-stack-cleanup.ll CodeGen/X86/preserve_mostcc64.ll CodeGen/X86/tailcallstack64.ll CodeGen/X86/this-return-64.ll This happens because COPY has other special meaning for e.g. dependency breakage and x87 FP stack. Note that all other backends' tests pass. Reviewers: qcolombet Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15157 llvm-svn: 254665
2015-12-04 07:43:56 +08:00
// Visit all operands: definitions can be implicit or explicit.
if (MO.isReg()) {
unsigned Reg = MO.getReg();
if (MO.isDef() && isNAPhysCopy(Reg)) {
CodeGen peephole: fold redundant phys reg copies Code generation often exposes redundant physical register copies through virtual registers such as: %vreg = COPY %PHYSREG ... %PHYSREG = COPY %vreg There are cases where no intervening clobber of %PHYSREG occurs, and the later copy could therefore be removed. In some cases this further allows us to remove the initial copy. This patch contains a motivating example which comes from the x86 build of Chrome, specifically cc::ResourceProvider::UnlockForRead uses libstdc++'s implementation of hash_map. That example has two tests live at the same time, and after machine sinking LLVM has confused itself enough and things spilling EFLAGS is a great idea even though it's never restored and the comparison results are both live. Before this patch we have: DEC32m %RIP, 1, %noreg, <ga:@L>, %noreg, %EFLAGS<imp-def> %vreg1<def> = COPY %EFLAGS; GR64:%vreg1 %EFLAGS<def> = COPY %vreg1; GR64:%vreg1 JNE_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use> Both copies are useless. This patch tries to eliminate the later copy in a generic manner. dec is especially confusing to LLVM when compared with sub. I wrote this patch to treat all physical registers generically, but only remove redundant copies of non-allocatable physical registers because the allocatable ones caused issues (e.g. when calling conventions weren't properly modeled) and should be handled later by the register allocator anyways. The following tests used to failed when the patch also replaced allocatable registers: CodeGen/X86/StackColoring.ll CodeGen/X86/avx512-calling-conv.ll CodeGen/X86/copy-propagation.ll CodeGen/X86/inline-asm-fpstack.ll CodeGen/X86/musttail-varargs.ll CodeGen/X86/pop-stack-cleanup.ll CodeGen/X86/preserve_mostcc64.ll CodeGen/X86/tailcallstack64.ll CodeGen/X86/this-return-64.ll This happens because COPY has other special meaning for e.g. dependency breakage and x87 FP stack. Note that all other backends' tests pass. Reviewers: qcolombet Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15157 llvm-svn: 254665
2015-12-04 07:43:56 +08:00
const auto &Def = NAPhysToVirtMIs.find(Reg);
if (Def != NAPhysToVirtMIs.end()) {
// A new definition of the non-allocatable physical register
// invalidates previous copies.
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs()
<< "NAPhysCopy: invalidating because of " << *MI);
CodeGen peephole: fold redundant phys reg copies Code generation often exposes redundant physical register copies through virtual registers such as: %vreg = COPY %PHYSREG ... %PHYSREG = COPY %vreg There are cases where no intervening clobber of %PHYSREG occurs, and the later copy could therefore be removed. In some cases this further allows us to remove the initial copy. This patch contains a motivating example which comes from the x86 build of Chrome, specifically cc::ResourceProvider::UnlockForRead uses libstdc++'s implementation of hash_map. That example has two tests live at the same time, and after machine sinking LLVM has confused itself enough and things spilling EFLAGS is a great idea even though it's never restored and the comparison results are both live. Before this patch we have: DEC32m %RIP, 1, %noreg, <ga:@L>, %noreg, %EFLAGS<imp-def> %vreg1<def> = COPY %EFLAGS; GR64:%vreg1 %EFLAGS<def> = COPY %vreg1; GR64:%vreg1 JNE_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use> Both copies are useless. This patch tries to eliminate the later copy in a generic manner. dec is especially confusing to LLVM when compared with sub. I wrote this patch to treat all physical registers generically, but only remove redundant copies of non-allocatable physical registers because the allocatable ones caused issues (e.g. when calling conventions weren't properly modeled) and should be handled later by the register allocator anyways. The following tests used to failed when the patch also replaced allocatable registers: CodeGen/X86/StackColoring.ll CodeGen/X86/avx512-calling-conv.ll CodeGen/X86/copy-propagation.ll CodeGen/X86/inline-asm-fpstack.ll CodeGen/X86/musttail-varargs.ll CodeGen/X86/pop-stack-cleanup.ll CodeGen/X86/preserve_mostcc64.ll CodeGen/X86/tailcallstack64.ll CodeGen/X86/this-return-64.ll This happens because COPY has other special meaning for e.g. dependency breakage and x87 FP stack. Note that all other backends' tests pass. Reviewers: qcolombet Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15157 llvm-svn: 254665
2015-12-04 07:43:56 +08:00
NAPhysToVirtMIs.erase(Def);
}
}
} else if (MO.isRegMask()) {
const uint32_t *RegMask = MO.getRegMask();
CodeGen peephole: fold redundant phys reg copies Code generation often exposes redundant physical register copies through virtual registers such as: %vreg = COPY %PHYSREG ... %PHYSREG = COPY %vreg There are cases where no intervening clobber of %PHYSREG occurs, and the later copy could therefore be removed. In some cases this further allows us to remove the initial copy. This patch contains a motivating example which comes from the x86 build of Chrome, specifically cc::ResourceProvider::UnlockForRead uses libstdc++'s implementation of hash_map. That example has two tests live at the same time, and after machine sinking LLVM has confused itself enough and things spilling EFLAGS is a great idea even though it's never restored and the comparison results are both live. Before this patch we have: DEC32m %RIP, 1, %noreg, <ga:@L>, %noreg, %EFLAGS<imp-def> %vreg1<def> = COPY %EFLAGS; GR64:%vreg1 %EFLAGS<def> = COPY %vreg1; GR64:%vreg1 JNE_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use> Both copies are useless. This patch tries to eliminate the later copy in a generic manner. dec is especially confusing to LLVM when compared with sub. I wrote this patch to treat all physical registers generically, but only remove redundant copies of non-allocatable physical registers because the allocatable ones caused issues (e.g. when calling conventions weren't properly modeled) and should be handled later by the register allocator anyways. The following tests used to failed when the patch also replaced allocatable registers: CodeGen/X86/StackColoring.ll CodeGen/X86/avx512-calling-conv.ll CodeGen/X86/copy-propagation.ll CodeGen/X86/inline-asm-fpstack.ll CodeGen/X86/musttail-varargs.ll CodeGen/X86/pop-stack-cleanup.ll CodeGen/X86/preserve_mostcc64.ll CodeGen/X86/tailcallstack64.ll CodeGen/X86/this-return-64.ll This happens because COPY has other special meaning for e.g. dependency breakage and x87 FP stack. Note that all other backends' tests pass. Reviewers: qcolombet Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15157 llvm-svn: 254665
2015-12-04 07:43:56 +08:00
for (auto &RegMI : NAPhysToVirtMIs) {
unsigned Def = RegMI.first;
if (MachineOperand::clobbersPhysReg(RegMask, Def)) {
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs()
<< "NAPhysCopy: invalidating because of " << *MI);
CodeGen peephole: fold redundant phys reg copies Code generation often exposes redundant physical register copies through virtual registers such as: %vreg = COPY %PHYSREG ... %PHYSREG = COPY %vreg There are cases where no intervening clobber of %PHYSREG occurs, and the later copy could therefore be removed. In some cases this further allows us to remove the initial copy. This patch contains a motivating example which comes from the x86 build of Chrome, specifically cc::ResourceProvider::UnlockForRead uses libstdc++'s implementation of hash_map. That example has two tests live at the same time, and after machine sinking LLVM has confused itself enough and things spilling EFLAGS is a great idea even though it's never restored and the comparison results are both live. Before this patch we have: DEC32m %RIP, 1, %noreg, <ga:@L>, %noreg, %EFLAGS<imp-def> %vreg1<def> = COPY %EFLAGS; GR64:%vreg1 %EFLAGS<def> = COPY %vreg1; GR64:%vreg1 JNE_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use> Both copies are useless. This patch tries to eliminate the later copy in a generic manner. dec is especially confusing to LLVM when compared with sub. I wrote this patch to treat all physical registers generically, but only remove redundant copies of non-allocatable physical registers because the allocatable ones caused issues (e.g. when calling conventions weren't properly modeled) and should be handled later by the register allocator anyways. The following tests used to failed when the patch also replaced allocatable registers: CodeGen/X86/StackColoring.ll CodeGen/X86/avx512-calling-conv.ll CodeGen/X86/copy-propagation.ll CodeGen/X86/inline-asm-fpstack.ll CodeGen/X86/musttail-varargs.ll CodeGen/X86/pop-stack-cleanup.ll CodeGen/X86/preserve_mostcc64.ll CodeGen/X86/tailcallstack64.ll CodeGen/X86/this-return-64.ll This happens because COPY has other special meaning for e.g. dependency breakage and x87 FP stack. Note that all other backends' tests pass. Reviewers: qcolombet Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15157 llvm-svn: 254665
2015-12-04 07:43:56 +08:00
NAPhysToVirtMIs.erase(Def);
}
}
}
}
}
if (MI->isImplicitDef() || MI->isKill())
continue;
if (MI->isInlineAsm() || MI->hasUnmodeledSideEffects()) {
// Blow away all non-allocatable physical registers knowledge since we
// don't know what's correct anymore.
//
// FIXME: handle explicit asm clobbers.
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "NAPhysCopy: blowing away all info due to "
<< *MI);
CodeGen peephole: fold redundant phys reg copies Code generation often exposes redundant physical register copies through virtual registers such as: %vreg = COPY %PHYSREG ... %PHYSREG = COPY %vreg There are cases where no intervening clobber of %PHYSREG occurs, and the later copy could therefore be removed. In some cases this further allows us to remove the initial copy. This patch contains a motivating example which comes from the x86 build of Chrome, specifically cc::ResourceProvider::UnlockForRead uses libstdc++'s implementation of hash_map. That example has two tests live at the same time, and after machine sinking LLVM has confused itself enough and things spilling EFLAGS is a great idea even though it's never restored and the comparison results are both live. Before this patch we have: DEC32m %RIP, 1, %noreg, <ga:@L>, %noreg, %EFLAGS<imp-def> %vreg1<def> = COPY %EFLAGS; GR64:%vreg1 %EFLAGS<def> = COPY %vreg1; GR64:%vreg1 JNE_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use> Both copies are useless. This patch tries to eliminate the later copy in a generic manner. dec is especially confusing to LLVM when compared with sub. I wrote this patch to treat all physical registers generically, but only remove redundant copies of non-allocatable physical registers because the allocatable ones caused issues (e.g. when calling conventions weren't properly modeled) and should be handled later by the register allocator anyways. The following tests used to failed when the patch also replaced allocatable registers: CodeGen/X86/StackColoring.ll CodeGen/X86/avx512-calling-conv.ll CodeGen/X86/copy-propagation.ll CodeGen/X86/inline-asm-fpstack.ll CodeGen/X86/musttail-varargs.ll CodeGen/X86/pop-stack-cleanup.ll CodeGen/X86/preserve_mostcc64.ll CodeGen/X86/tailcallstack64.ll CodeGen/X86/this-return-64.ll This happens because COPY has other special meaning for e.g. dependency breakage and x87 FP stack. Note that all other backends' tests pass. Reviewers: qcolombet Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15157 llvm-svn: 254665
2015-12-04 07:43:56 +08:00
NAPhysToVirtMIs.clear();
}
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
if ((isUncoalescableCopy(*MI) &&
optimizeUncoalescableCopy(*MI, LocalMIs)) ||
(MI->isCompare() && optimizeCmpInstr(*MI)) ||
(MI->isSelect() && optimizeSelect(*MI, LocalMIs))) {
// MI is deleted.
LocalMIs.erase(MI);
Changed = true;
continue;
}
if (MI->isConditionalBranch() && optimizeCondBranch(*MI)) {
Changed = true;
continue;
}
if (isCoalescableCopy(*MI) && optimizeCoalescableCopy(*MI)) {
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
// MI is just rewritten.
Changed = true;
continue;
}
CodeGen peephole: fold redundant phys reg copies Code generation often exposes redundant physical register copies through virtual registers such as: %vreg = COPY %PHYSREG ... %PHYSREG = COPY %vreg There are cases where no intervening clobber of %PHYSREG occurs, and the later copy could therefore be removed. In some cases this further allows us to remove the initial copy. This patch contains a motivating example which comes from the x86 build of Chrome, specifically cc::ResourceProvider::UnlockForRead uses libstdc++'s implementation of hash_map. That example has two tests live at the same time, and after machine sinking LLVM has confused itself enough and things spilling EFLAGS is a great idea even though it's never restored and the comparison results are both live. Before this patch we have: DEC32m %RIP, 1, %noreg, <ga:@L>, %noreg, %EFLAGS<imp-def> %vreg1<def> = COPY %EFLAGS; GR64:%vreg1 %EFLAGS<def> = COPY %vreg1; GR64:%vreg1 JNE_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use> Both copies are useless. This patch tries to eliminate the later copy in a generic manner. dec is especially confusing to LLVM when compared with sub. I wrote this patch to treat all physical registers generically, but only remove redundant copies of non-allocatable physical registers because the allocatable ones caused issues (e.g. when calling conventions weren't properly modeled) and should be handled later by the register allocator anyways. The following tests used to failed when the patch also replaced allocatable registers: CodeGen/X86/StackColoring.ll CodeGen/X86/avx512-calling-conv.ll CodeGen/X86/copy-propagation.ll CodeGen/X86/inline-asm-fpstack.ll CodeGen/X86/musttail-varargs.ll CodeGen/X86/pop-stack-cleanup.ll CodeGen/X86/preserve_mostcc64.ll CodeGen/X86/tailcallstack64.ll CodeGen/X86/this-return-64.ll This happens because COPY has other special meaning for e.g. dependency breakage and x87 FP stack. Note that all other backends' tests pass. Reviewers: qcolombet Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15157 llvm-svn: 254665
2015-12-04 07:43:56 +08:00
if (MI->isCopy() &&
(foldRedundantCopy(*MI, CopySrcRegs, CopySrcMIs) ||
foldRedundantNAPhysCopy(*MI, NAPhysToVirtMIs))) {
LocalMIs.erase(MI);
MI->eraseFromParent();
Changed = true;
continue;
}
if (isMoveImmediate(*MI, ImmDefRegs, ImmDefMIs)) {
SeenMoveImm = true;
} else {
Changed |= optimizeExtInstr(*MI, MBB, LocalMIs);
// optimizeExtInstr might have created new instructions after MI
// and before the already incremented MII. Adjust MII so that the
// next iteration sees the new instructions.
MII = MI;
++MII;
if (SeenMoveImm)
Changed |= foldImmediate(*MI, ImmDefRegs, ImmDefMIs);
}
// Check whether MI is a load candidate for folding into a later
// instruction. If MI is not a candidate, check whether we can fold an
// earlier load into MI.
if (!isLoadFoldable(*MI, FoldAsLoadDefCandidates) &&
!FoldAsLoadDefCandidates.empty()) {
// We visit each operand even after successfully folding a previous
// one. This allows us to fold multiple loads into a single
// instruction. We do assume that optimizeLoadInstr doesn't insert
// foldable uses earlier in the argument list. Since we don't restart
// iteration, we'd miss such cases.
const MCInstrDesc &MIDesc = MI->getDesc();
for (unsigned i = MIDesc.getNumDefs(); i != MI->getNumOperands();
++i) {
const MachineOperand &MOp = MI->getOperand(i);
if (!MOp.isReg())
continue;
unsigned FoldAsLoadDefReg = MOp.getReg();
if (FoldAsLoadDefCandidates.count(FoldAsLoadDefReg)) {
// We need to fold load after optimizeCmpInstr, since
// optimizeCmpInstr can enable folding by converting SUB to CMP.
// Save FoldAsLoadDefReg because optimizeLoadInstr() resets it and
// we need it for markUsesInDebugValueAsUndef().
unsigned FoldedReg = FoldAsLoadDefReg;
MachineInstr *DefMI = nullptr;
if (MachineInstr *FoldMI =
TII->optimizeLoadInstr(*MI, MRI, FoldAsLoadDefReg, DefMI)) {
// Update LocalMIs since we replaced MI with FoldMI and deleted
// DefMI.
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Replacing: " << *MI);
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << " With: " << *FoldMI);
LocalMIs.erase(MI);
LocalMIs.erase(DefMI);
LocalMIs.insert(FoldMI);
MI->eraseFromParent();
DefMI->eraseFromParent();
MRI->markUsesInDebugValueAsUndef(FoldedReg);
FoldAsLoadDefCandidates.erase(FoldedReg);
++NumLoadFold;
Remove redundant copy in recurrences Summary: If there is a chain of instructions formulating a recurrence, commuting operands can help removing a redundant copy. In the following example code, ``` BB#1: ; Loop Header %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: ; Loop Latch %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg1<kill,tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1,%vreg0 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg2<kill,tied0>, %vreg10<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2,%vreg10 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> ``` Existing two-address generation pass generates following code: ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg1<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` This is suboptimal because the assembly code generated has a redundant copy at the end of #BB6 to feed %vreg13 to BB#1: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %esi, %edi addl %ebx, %edi cmpl $10, %edi movl %edi, %esi jl .LBB0_1 ``` This redundant copy can be elimiated by making instructions in the recurrence chain to compute the value "into" the register that actually holds the feedback value. In this example, this can be achieved by commuting %vreg0 and %vreg1 to compute %vreg10. With that change, code after two-address generation becomes ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: derived from LLVM BB %bb7 Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg0<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg1<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` and the final assembly does not have redundant copy: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %edi, %eax addl %ebx, %eax cmpl $10, %eax jl .LBB0_1 ``` Reviewers: qcolombet, MatzeB, wmi Reviewed By: wmi Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31821 llvm-svn: 306758
2017-06-30 07:11:24 +08:00
// MI is replaced with FoldMI so we can continue trying to fold
Changed = true;
MI = FoldMI;
}
}
}
}
Remove redundant copy in recurrences Summary: If there is a chain of instructions formulating a recurrence, commuting operands can help removing a redundant copy. In the following example code, ``` BB#1: ; Loop Header %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: ; Loop Latch %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg1<kill,tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1,%vreg0 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg2<kill,tied0>, %vreg10<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2,%vreg10 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> ``` Existing two-address generation pass generates following code: ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg1<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg0<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` This is suboptimal because the assembly code generated has a redundant copy at the end of #BB6 to feed %vreg13 to BB#1: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %esi, %edi addl %ebx, %edi cmpl $10, %edi movl %edi, %esi jl .LBB0_1 ``` This redundant copy can be elimiated by making instructions in the recurrence chain to compute the value "into" the register that actually holds the feedback value. In this example, this can be achieved by commuting %vreg0 and %vreg1 to compute %vreg10. With that change, code after two-address generation becomes ``` BB#1: %vreg0<def> = COPY %vreg13<kill>; GR32:%vreg0,%vreg13 ... BB#6: derived from LLVM BB %bb7 Predecessors according to CFG: BB#5 BB#4 %vreg2<def> = COPY %vreg15<kill>; GR32:%vreg2,%vreg15 %vreg10<def> = COPY %vreg0<kill>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg0 %vreg10<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg10<tied0>, %vreg1<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg10,%vreg1 %vreg3<def> = COPY %vreg10<kill>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg10 %vreg3<def,tied1> = ADD32rr %vreg3<tied0>, %vreg2<kill>, %EFLAGS<imp-def,dead>; GR32:%vreg3,%vreg2 CMP32ri8 %vreg3, 10, %EFLAGS<imp-def>; GR32:%vreg3 %vreg13<def> = COPY %vreg3<kill>; GR32:%vreg13,%vreg3 JL_1 <BB#1>, %EFLAGS<imp-use,kill> JMP_1 <BB#7> ``` and the final assembly does not have redundant copy: ``` .LBB0_6: addl %edi, %eax addl %ebx, %eax cmpl $10, %eax jl .LBB0_1 ``` Reviewers: qcolombet, MatzeB, wmi Reviewed By: wmi Subscribers: llvm-commits Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31821 llvm-svn: 306758
2017-06-30 07:11:24 +08:00
// If we run into an instruction we can't fold across, discard
// the load candidates. Note: We might be able to fold *into* this
// instruction, so this needs to be after the folding logic.
if (MI->isLoadFoldBarrier()) {
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "Encountered load fold barrier on " << *MI);
FoldAsLoadDefCandidates.clear();
}
}
}
return Changed;
}
ValueTrackerResult ValueTracker::getNextSourceFromCopy() {
assert(Def->isCopy() && "Invalid definition");
// Copy instruction are supposed to be: Def = Src.
// If someone breaks this assumption, bad things will happen everywhere.
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
assert(Def->getNumOperands() == 2 && "Invalid number of operands");
if (Def->getOperand(DefIdx).getSubReg() != DefSubReg)
// If we look for a different subreg, it means we want a subreg of src.
2015-09-09 08:38:33 +08:00
// Bails as we do not support composing subregs yet.
return ValueTrackerResult();
// Otherwise, we want the whole source.
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
const MachineOperand &Src = Def->getOperand(1);
if (Src.isUndef())
return ValueTrackerResult();
return ValueTrackerResult(Src.getReg(), Src.getSubReg());
}
ValueTrackerResult ValueTracker::getNextSourceFromBitcast() {
assert(Def->isBitcast() && "Invalid definition");
// Bail if there are effects that a plain copy will not expose.
if (Def->hasUnmodeledSideEffects())
return ValueTrackerResult();
// Bitcasts with more than one def are not supported.
if (Def->getDesc().getNumDefs() != 1)
return ValueTrackerResult();
const MachineOperand DefOp = Def->getOperand(DefIdx);
if (DefOp.getSubReg() != DefSubReg)
// If we look for a different subreg, it means we want a subreg of the src.
2015-09-09 08:38:33 +08:00
// Bails as we do not support composing subregs yet.
return ValueTrackerResult();
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
unsigned SrcIdx = Def->getNumOperands();
for (unsigned OpIdx = DefIdx + 1, EndOpIdx = SrcIdx; OpIdx != EndOpIdx;
++OpIdx) {
const MachineOperand &MO = Def->getOperand(OpIdx);
if (!MO.isReg() || !MO.getReg())
continue;
// Ignore dead implicit defs.
if (MO.isImplicit() && MO.isDead())
continue;
assert(!MO.isDef() && "We should have skipped all the definitions by now");
if (SrcIdx != EndOpIdx)
// Multiple sources?
return ValueTrackerResult();
SrcIdx = OpIdx;
}
// Stop when any user of the bitcast is a SUBREG_TO_REG, replacing with a COPY
// will break the assumed guarantees for the upper bits.
for (const MachineInstr &UseMI : MRI.use_nodbg_instructions(DefOp.getReg())) {
if (UseMI.isSubregToReg())
return ValueTrackerResult();
}
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
const MachineOperand &Src = Def->getOperand(SrcIdx);
if (Src.isUndef())
return ValueTrackerResult();
return ValueTrackerResult(Src.getReg(), Src.getSubReg());
}
ValueTrackerResult ValueTracker::getNextSourceFromRegSequence() {
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
assert((Def->isRegSequence() || Def->isRegSequenceLike()) &&
"Invalid definition");
if (Def->getOperand(DefIdx).getSubReg())
2015-09-09 08:38:33 +08:00
// If we are composing subregs, bail out.
// The case we are checking is Def.<subreg> = REG_SEQUENCE.
// This should almost never happen as the SSA property is tracked at
// the register level (as opposed to the subreg level).
// I.e.,
// Def.sub0 =
// Def.sub1 =
// is a valid SSA representation for Def.sub0 and Def.sub1, but not for
// Def. Thus, it must not be generated.
// However, some code could theoretically generates a single
// Def.sub0 (i.e, not defining the other subregs) and we would
// have this case.
// If we can ascertain (or force) that this never happens, we could
// turn that into an assertion.
return ValueTrackerResult();
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
if (!TII)
// We could handle the REG_SEQUENCE here, but we do not want to
// duplicate the code from the generic TII.
return ValueTrackerResult();
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
SmallVector<RegSubRegPairAndIdx, 8> RegSeqInputRegs;
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
if (!TII->getRegSequenceInputs(*Def, DefIdx, RegSeqInputRegs))
return ValueTrackerResult();
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
// We are looking at:
// Def = REG_SEQUENCE v0, sub0, v1, sub1, ...
// Check if one of the operand defines the subreg we are interested in.
for (const RegSubRegPairAndIdx &RegSeqInput : RegSeqInputRegs) {
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
if (RegSeqInput.SubIdx == DefSubReg) {
if (RegSeqInput.SubReg)
2015-09-09 08:38:33 +08:00
// Bail if we have to compose sub registers.
return ValueTrackerResult();
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
return ValueTrackerResult(RegSeqInput.Reg, RegSeqInput.SubReg);
}
}
// If the subreg we are tracking is super-defined by another subreg,
// we could follow this value. However, this would require to compose
// the subreg and we do not do that for now.
return ValueTrackerResult();
}
ValueTrackerResult ValueTracker::getNextSourceFromInsertSubreg() {
assert((Def->isInsertSubreg() || Def->isInsertSubregLike()) &&
"Invalid definition");
if (Def->getOperand(DefIdx).getSubReg())
2015-09-09 08:38:33 +08:00
// If we are composing subreg, bail out.
// Same remark as getNextSourceFromRegSequence.
// I.e., this may be turned into an assert.
return ValueTrackerResult();
if (!TII)
// We could handle the REG_SEQUENCE here, but we do not want to
// duplicate the code from the generic TII.
return ValueTrackerResult();
RegSubRegPair BaseReg;
RegSubRegPairAndIdx InsertedReg;
if (!TII->getInsertSubregInputs(*Def, DefIdx, BaseReg, InsertedReg))
return ValueTrackerResult();
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
// We are looking at:
// Def = INSERT_SUBREG v0, v1, sub1
// There are two cases:
// 1. DefSubReg == sub1, get v1.
// 2. DefSubReg != sub1, the value may be available through v0.
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
// #1 Check if the inserted register matches the required sub index.
if (InsertedReg.SubIdx == DefSubReg) {
return ValueTrackerResult(InsertedReg.Reg, InsertedReg.SubReg);
}
// #2 Otherwise, if the sub register we are looking for is not partial
// defined by the inserted element, we can look through the main
// register (v0).
const MachineOperand &MODef = Def->getOperand(DefIdx);
// If the result register (Def) and the base register (v0) do not
// have the same register class or if we have to compose
2015-09-09 08:38:33 +08:00
// subregisters, bail out.
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
if (MRI.getRegClass(MODef.getReg()) != MRI.getRegClass(BaseReg.Reg) ||
BaseReg.SubReg)
return ValueTrackerResult();
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
// Get the TRI and check if the inserted sub-register overlaps with the
// sub-register we are tracking.
const TargetRegisterInfo *TRI = MRI.getTargetRegisterInfo();
if (!TRI ||
!(TRI->getSubRegIndexLaneMask(DefSubReg) &
TRI->getSubRegIndexLaneMask(InsertedReg.SubIdx)).none())
return ValueTrackerResult();
// At this point, the value is available in v0 via the same subreg
// we used for Def.
return ValueTrackerResult(BaseReg.Reg, DefSubReg);
}
ValueTrackerResult ValueTracker::getNextSourceFromExtractSubreg() {
assert((Def->isExtractSubreg() ||
Def->isExtractSubregLike()) && "Invalid definition");
// We are looking at:
// Def = EXTRACT_SUBREG v0, sub0
2015-09-09 08:38:33 +08:00
// Bail if we have to compose sub registers.
// Indeed, if DefSubReg != 0, we would have to compose it with sub0.
if (DefSubReg)
return ValueTrackerResult();
if (!TII)
// We could handle the EXTRACT_SUBREG here, but we do not want to
// duplicate the code from the generic TII.
return ValueTrackerResult();
RegSubRegPairAndIdx ExtractSubregInputReg;
if (!TII->getExtractSubregInputs(*Def, DefIdx, ExtractSubregInputReg))
return ValueTrackerResult();
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
2015-09-09 08:38:33 +08:00
// Bail if we have to compose sub registers.
// Likewise, if v0.subreg != 0, we would have to compose v0.subreg with sub0.
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
if (ExtractSubregInputReg.SubReg)
return ValueTrackerResult();
// Otherwise, the value is available in the v0.sub0.
2015-12-30 03:34:53 +08:00
return ValueTrackerResult(ExtractSubregInputReg.Reg,
ExtractSubregInputReg.SubIdx);
}
ValueTrackerResult ValueTracker::getNextSourceFromSubregToReg() {
assert(Def->isSubregToReg() && "Invalid definition");
// We are looking at:
// Def = SUBREG_TO_REG Imm, v0, sub0
2015-09-09 08:38:33 +08:00
// Bail if we have to compose sub registers.
// If DefSubReg != sub0, we would have to check that all the bits
// we track are included in sub0 and if yes, we would have to
// determine the right subreg in v0.
if (DefSubReg != Def->getOperand(3).getImm())
return ValueTrackerResult();
2015-09-09 08:38:33 +08:00
// Bail if we have to compose sub registers.
// Likewise, if v0.subreg != 0, we would have to compose it with sub0.
if (Def->getOperand(2).getSubReg())
return ValueTrackerResult();
return ValueTrackerResult(Def->getOperand(2).getReg(),
Def->getOperand(3).getImm());
}
/// Explore each PHI incoming operand and return its sources.
ValueTrackerResult ValueTracker::getNextSourceFromPHI() {
assert(Def->isPHI() && "Invalid definition");
ValueTrackerResult Res;
2015-09-09 08:38:33 +08:00
// If we look for a different subreg, bail as we do not support composing
// subregs yet.
if (Def->getOperand(0).getSubReg() != DefSubReg)
return ValueTrackerResult();
// Return all register sources for PHI instructions.
for (unsigned i = 1, e = Def->getNumOperands(); i < e; i += 2) {
const MachineOperand &MO = Def->getOperand(i);
assert(MO.isReg() && "Invalid PHI instruction");
// We have no code to deal with undef operands. They shouldn't happen in
// normal programs anyway.
if (MO.isUndef())
return ValueTrackerResult();
Res.addSource(MO.getReg(), MO.getSubReg());
}
return Res;
}
ValueTrackerResult ValueTracker::getNextSourceImpl() {
assert(Def && "This method needs a valid definition");
assert(((Def->getOperand(DefIdx).isDef() &&
(DefIdx < Def->getDesc().getNumDefs() ||
Def->getDesc().isVariadic())) ||
Def->getOperand(DefIdx).isImplicit()) &&
"Invalid DefIdx");
if (Def->isCopy())
return getNextSourceFromCopy();
if (Def->isBitcast())
return getNextSourceFromBitcast();
// All the remaining cases involve "complex" instructions.
2015-09-09 08:38:33 +08:00
// Bail if we did not ask for the advanced tracking.
if (DisableAdvCopyOpt)
return ValueTrackerResult();
[PeepholeOptimizer] Refactor the advanced copy optimization to take advantage of the isRegSequence property. This is a follow-up of r215394 and r215404, which respectively introduces the isRegSequence property and uses it for ARM. Thanks to the property introduced by the previous commits, this patch is able to optimize the following sequence: vmov d0, r2, r3 vmov d1, r0, r1 vmov r0, s0 vmov r1, s2 udiv r0, r1, r0 vmov r1, s1 vmov r2, s3 udiv r1, r2, r1 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr into: udiv r0, r0, r2 udiv r1, r1, r3 vmov.32 d16[0], r0 vmov.32 d16[1], r1 vmov r0, r1, d16 bx lr This patch refactors how the copy optimizations are done in the peephole optimizer. Prior to this patch, we had one copy-related optimization that replaced a copy or bitcast by a generic, more suitable (in terms of register file), copy. With this patch, the peephole optimizer features two copy-related optimizations: 1. One for rewriting generic copies to generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeCoalescableCopy. 2. One for replacing non-generic copies with generic copies: PeepholeOptimizer::optimizeUncoalescableCopy. The goals of these two optimizations are slightly different: one rewrite the operand of the instruction (#1), the other kills off the non-generic instruction and replace it by a (sequence of) generic instruction(s). Both optimizations rely on the ValueTracker introduced in r212100. The ValueTracker has been refactored to use the information from the TargetInstrInfo for non-generic instruction. As part of the refactoring, we switched the tracking from the index of the definition to the actual register (virtual or physical). This one change is to provide better consistency with register related APIs and to ease the use of the TargetInstrInfo. Moreover, this patch introduces a new helper class CopyRewriter used to ease the rewriting of generic copies (i.e., #1). Finally, this patch adds a dead code elimination pass right after the peephole optimizer to get rid of dead code that may appear after rewriting. This is related to <rdar://problem/12702965>. Review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4874 llvm-svn: 216088
2014-08-21 01:41:48 +08:00
if (Def->isRegSequence() || Def->isRegSequenceLike())
return getNextSourceFromRegSequence();
if (Def->isInsertSubreg() || Def->isInsertSubregLike())
return getNextSourceFromInsertSubreg();
if (Def->isExtractSubreg() || Def->isExtractSubregLike())
return getNextSourceFromExtractSubreg();
if (Def->isSubregToReg())
return getNextSourceFromSubregToReg();
if (Def->isPHI())
return getNextSourceFromPHI();
return ValueTrackerResult();
}
ValueTrackerResult ValueTracker::getNextSource() {
// If we reach a point where we cannot move up in the use-def chain,
// there is nothing we can get.
if (!Def)
return ValueTrackerResult();
ValueTrackerResult Res = getNextSourceImpl();
if (Res.isValid()) {
// Update definition, definition index, and subregister for the
// next call of getNextSource.
// Update the current register.
bool OneRegSrc = Res.getNumSources() == 1;
if (OneRegSrc)
Reg = Res.getSrcReg(0);
// Update the result before moving up in the use-def chain
// with the instruction containing the last found sources.
Res.setInst(Def);
// If we can still move up in the use-def chain, move to the next
// definition.
if (!TargetRegisterInfo::isPhysicalRegister(Reg) && OneRegSrc) {
MachineRegisterInfo::def_iterator DI = MRI.def_begin(Reg);
if (DI != MRI.def_end()) {
Def = DI->getParent();
DefIdx = DI.getOperandNo();
DefSubReg = Res.getSrcSubReg(0);
} else {
Def = nullptr;
}
return Res;
}
}
// If we end up here, this means we will not be able to find another source
// for the next iteration. Make sure any new call to getNextSource bails out
// early by cutting the use-def chain.
Def = nullptr;
return Res;
}