llvm-project/llvm/test/Transforms/EarlyCSE/invariant.start.ll

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

528 lines
21 KiB
LLVM
Raw Normal View History

; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_test_checks.py UTC_ARGS: --function-signature
; RUN: opt < %s -S -early-cse | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,NO_ASSUME
; RUN: opt < %s -S -early-cse --enable-knowledge-retention | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,USE_ASSUME
; RUN: opt < %s -S -passes=early-cse | FileCheck %s --check-prefixes=CHECK,NO_ASSUME
declare {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i8(i64, i8* nocapture) nounwind readonly
declare void @llvm.invariant.end.p0i8({}*, i64, i8* nocapture) nounwind
; Check that we do load-load forwarding over invariant.start, since it does not
; clobber memory
define i8 @test_bypass1(i8 *%P) {
; NO_ASSUME-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_bypass1
; NO_ASSUME-SAME: (i8* [[P:%.*]])
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: [[V1:%.*]] = load i8, i8* [[P]], align 1
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: [[I:%.*]] = call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i8(i64 1, i8* [[P]])
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: ret i8 0
;
; USE_ASSUME-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_bypass1
; USE_ASSUME-SAME: (i8* [[P:%.*]])
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: [[V1:%.*]] = load i8, i8* [[P]], align 1
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: [[I:%.*]] = call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i8(i64 1, i8* [[P]])
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: call void @llvm.assume(i1 true) [ "dereferenceable"(i8* [[P]], i64 1), "nonnull"(i8* [[P]]) ]
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: ret i8 0
;
%V1 = load i8, i8* %P
%i = call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i8(i64 1, i8* %P)
%V2 = load i8, i8* %P
%Diff = sub i8 %V1, %V2
ret i8 %Diff
}
; Trivial Store->load forwarding over invariant.start
define i8 @test_bypass2(i8 *%P) {
; NO_ASSUME-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_bypass2
; NO_ASSUME-SAME: (i8* [[P:%.*]])
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: store i8 42, i8* [[P]], align 1
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: [[I:%.*]] = call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i8(i64 1, i8* [[P]])
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: ret i8 42
;
; USE_ASSUME-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_bypass2
; USE_ASSUME-SAME: (i8* [[P:%.*]])
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: store i8 42, i8* [[P]], align 1
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: [[I:%.*]] = call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i8(i64 1, i8* [[P]])
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: call void @llvm.assume(i1 true) [ "dereferenceable"(i8* [[P]], i64 1), "nonnull"(i8* [[P]]) ]
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: ret i8 42
;
store i8 42, i8* %P
%i = call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i8(i64 1, i8* %P)
%V1 = load i8, i8* %P
ret i8 %V1
}
; We can DSE over invariant.start calls, since the first store to
; %P is valid, and the second store is actually unreachable based on semantics
; of invariant.start.
define void @test_bypass3(i8* %P) {
; NO_ASSUME-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_bypass3
; NO_ASSUME-SAME: (i8* [[P:%.*]])
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: [[I:%.*]] = call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i8(i64 1, i8* [[P]])
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: store i8 60, i8* [[P]], align 1
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: ret void
;
; USE_ASSUME-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_bypass3
; USE_ASSUME-SAME: (i8* [[P:%.*]])
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: [[I:%.*]] = call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i8(i64 1, i8* [[P]])
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: call void @llvm.assume(i1 true) [ "dereferenceable"(i8* [[P]], i64 1), "nonnull"(i8* [[P]]) ]
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: store i8 60, i8* [[P]], align 1
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: ret void
;
store i8 50, i8* %P
%i = call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i8(i64 1, i8* %P)
store i8 60, i8* %P
ret void
}
; FIXME: Now the first store can actually be eliminated, since there is no read within
; the invariant region, between start and end.
define void @test_bypass4(i8* %P) {
; CHECK-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_bypass4
; CHECK-SAME: (i8* [[P:%.*]])
; CHECK-NEXT: store i8 50, i8* [[P]], align 1
; CHECK-NEXT: [[I:%.*]] = call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i8(i64 1, i8* [[P]])
; CHECK-NEXT: call void @llvm.invariant.end.p0i8({}* [[I]], i64 1, i8* [[P]])
; CHECK-NEXT: store i8 60, i8* [[P]], align 1
; CHECK-NEXT: ret void
;
store i8 50, i8* %P
%i = call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i8(i64 1, i8* %P)
call void @llvm.invariant.end.p0i8({}* %i, i64 1, i8* %P)
store i8 60, i8* %P
ret void
}
declare void @clobber()
declare {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 %size, i32* nocapture %ptr)
declare void @llvm.invariant.end.p0i32({}*, i64, i32* nocapture) nounwind
define i32 @test_before_load(i32* %p) {
; NO_ASSUME-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_before_load
; NO_ASSUME-SAME: (i32* [[P:%.*]])
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 4, i32* [[P]])
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: [[V1:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[P]], align 4
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: call void @clobber()
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: ret i32 0
;
; USE_ASSUME-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_before_load
; USE_ASSUME-SAME: (i32* [[P:%.*]])
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 4, i32* [[P]])
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: [[V1:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[P]], align 4
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: call void @clobber()
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: call void @llvm.assume(i1 true) [ "dereferenceable"(i32* [[P]], i64 4), "nonnull"(i32* [[P]]), "align"(i32* [[P]], i64 4) ]
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: ret i32 0
;
call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 4, i32* %p)
%v1 = load i32, i32* %p
call void @clobber()
%v2 = load i32, i32* %p
%sub = sub i32 %v1, %v2
ret i32 %sub
}
define i32 @test_before_clobber(i32* %p) {
; NO_ASSUME-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_before_clobber
; NO_ASSUME-SAME: (i32* [[P:%.*]])
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: [[V1:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[P]], align 4
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 4, i32* [[P]])
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: call void @clobber()
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: ret i32 0
;
; USE_ASSUME-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_before_clobber
; USE_ASSUME-SAME: (i32* [[P:%.*]])
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: [[V1:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[P]], align 4
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 4, i32* [[P]])
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: call void @clobber()
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: call void @llvm.assume(i1 true) [ "dereferenceable"(i32* [[P]], i64 4), "nonnull"(i32* [[P]]), "align"(i32* [[P]], i64 4) ]
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: ret i32 0
;
%v1 = load i32, i32* %p
call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 4, i32* %p)
call void @clobber()
%v2 = load i32, i32* %p
%sub = sub i32 %v1, %v2
ret i32 %sub
}
define i32 @test_duplicate_scope(i32* %p) {
; NO_ASSUME-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_duplicate_scope
; NO_ASSUME-SAME: (i32* [[P:%.*]])
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: [[V1:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[P]], align 4
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 4, i32* [[P]])
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: call void @clobber()
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: [[TMP2:%.*]] = call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 4, i32* [[P]])
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: ret i32 0
;
; USE_ASSUME-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_duplicate_scope
; USE_ASSUME-SAME: (i32* [[P:%.*]])
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: [[V1:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[P]], align 4
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 4, i32* [[P]])
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: call void @clobber()
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: [[TMP2:%.*]] = call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 4, i32* [[P]])
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: call void @llvm.assume(i1 true) [ "dereferenceable"(i32* [[P]], i64 4), "nonnull"(i32* [[P]]), "align"(i32* [[P]], i64 4) ]
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: ret i32 0
;
%v1 = load i32, i32* %p
call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 4, i32* %p)
call void @clobber()
call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 4, i32* %p)
%v2 = load i32, i32* %p
%sub = sub i32 %v1, %v2
ret i32 %sub
}
define i32 @test_unanalzyable_load(i32* %p) {
; NO_ASSUME-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_unanalzyable_load
; NO_ASSUME-SAME: (i32* [[P:%.*]])
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 4, i32* [[P]])
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: call void @clobber()
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: [[V1:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[P]], align 4
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: call void @clobber()
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: ret i32 0
;
; USE_ASSUME-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_unanalzyable_load
; USE_ASSUME-SAME: (i32* [[P:%.*]])
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 4, i32* [[P]])
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: call void @clobber()
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: [[V1:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[P]], align 4
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: call void @clobber()
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: call void @llvm.assume(i1 true) [ "dereferenceable"(i32* [[P]], i64 4), "nonnull"(i32* [[P]]), "align"(i32* [[P]], i64 4) ]
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: ret i32 0
;
call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 4, i32* %p)
call void @clobber()
%v1 = load i32, i32* %p
call void @clobber()
%v2 = load i32, i32* %p
%sub = sub i32 %v1, %v2
ret i32 %sub
}
define i32 @test_negative_after_clobber(i32* %p) {
; CHECK-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_negative_after_clobber
; CHECK-SAME: (i32* [[P:%.*]])
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; CHECK-NEXT: [[V1:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[P]], align 4
; CHECK-NEXT: call void @clobber()
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 4, i32* [[P]])
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; CHECK-NEXT: [[V2:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[P]], align 4
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SUB:%.*]] = sub i32 [[V1]], [[V2]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[SUB]]
;
%v1 = load i32, i32* %p
call void @clobber()
call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 4, i32* %p)
%v2 = load i32, i32* %p
%sub = sub i32 %v1, %v2
ret i32 %sub
}
define i32 @test_merge(i32* %p, i1 %cnd) {
; NO_ASSUME-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_merge
; NO_ASSUME-SAME: (i32* [[P:%.*]], i1 [[CND:%.*]])
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: [[V1:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[P]], align 4
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 4, i32* [[P]])
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: br i1 [[CND]], label [[MERGE:%.*]], label [[TAKEN:%.*]]
; NO_ASSUME: taken:
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: call void @clobber()
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: br label [[MERGE]]
; NO_ASSUME: merge:
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: ret i32 0
;
; USE_ASSUME-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_merge
; USE_ASSUME-SAME: (i32* [[P:%.*]], i1 [[CND:%.*]])
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: [[V1:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[P]], align 4
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 4, i32* [[P]])
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: br i1 [[CND]], label [[MERGE:%.*]], label [[TAKEN:%.*]]
; USE_ASSUME: taken:
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: call void @clobber()
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: br label [[MERGE]]
; USE_ASSUME: merge:
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: call void @llvm.assume(i1 true) [ "dereferenceable"(i32* [[P]], i64 4), "nonnull"(i32* [[P]]), "align"(i32* [[P]], i64 4) ]
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: ret i32 0
;
%v1 = load i32, i32* %p
call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 4, i32* %p)
br i1 %cnd, label %merge, label %taken
taken:
call void @clobber()
br label %merge
merge:
%v2 = load i32, i32* %p
%sub = sub i32 %v1, %v2
ret i32 %sub
}
define i32 @test_negative_after_mergeclobber(i32* %p, i1 %cnd) {
; CHECK-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_negative_after_mergeclobber
; CHECK-SAME: (i32* [[P:%.*]], i1 [[CND:%.*]])
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; CHECK-NEXT: [[V1:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[P]], align 4
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[CND]], label [[MERGE:%.*]], label [[TAKEN:%.*]]
; CHECK: taken:
; CHECK-NEXT: call void @clobber()
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[MERGE]]
; CHECK: merge:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 4, i32* [[P]])
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; CHECK-NEXT: [[V2:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[P]], align 4
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SUB:%.*]] = sub i32 [[V1]], [[V2]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[SUB]]
;
%v1 = load i32, i32* %p
br i1 %cnd, label %merge, label %taken
taken:
call void @clobber()
br label %merge
merge:
call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 4, i32* %p)
%v2 = load i32, i32* %p
%sub = sub i32 %v1, %v2
ret i32 %sub
}
; In theory, this version could work, but earlycse is incapable of
; merging facts along distinct paths.
define i32 @test_false_negative_merge(i32* %p, i1 %cnd) {
; CHECK-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_false_negative_merge
; CHECK-SAME: (i32* [[P:%.*]], i1 [[CND:%.*]])
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; CHECK-NEXT: [[V1:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[P]], align 4
; CHECK-NEXT: br i1 [[CND]], label [[MERGE:%.*]], label [[TAKEN:%.*]]
; CHECK: taken:
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 4, i32* [[P]])
; CHECK-NEXT: call void @clobber()
; CHECK-NEXT: br label [[MERGE]]
; CHECK: merge:
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; CHECK-NEXT: [[V2:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[P]], align 4
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SUB:%.*]] = sub i32 [[V1]], [[V2]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[SUB]]
;
%v1 = load i32, i32* %p
br i1 %cnd, label %merge, label %taken
taken:
call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 4, i32* %p)
call void @clobber()
br label %merge
merge:
%v2 = load i32, i32* %p
%sub = sub i32 %v1, %v2
ret i32 %sub
}
define i32 @test_merge_unanalyzable_load(i32* %p, i1 %cnd) {
; NO_ASSUME-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_merge_unanalyzable_load
; NO_ASSUME-SAME: (i32* [[P:%.*]], i1 [[CND:%.*]])
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 4, i32* [[P]])
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: call void @clobber()
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: [[V1:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[P]], align 4
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: br i1 [[CND]], label [[MERGE:%.*]], label [[TAKEN:%.*]]
; NO_ASSUME: taken:
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: call void @clobber()
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: br label [[MERGE]]
; NO_ASSUME: merge:
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: ret i32 0
;
; USE_ASSUME-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_merge_unanalyzable_load
; USE_ASSUME-SAME: (i32* [[P:%.*]], i1 [[CND:%.*]])
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 4, i32* [[P]])
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: call void @clobber()
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: [[V1:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[P]], align 4
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: br i1 [[CND]], label [[MERGE:%.*]], label [[TAKEN:%.*]]
; USE_ASSUME: taken:
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: call void @clobber()
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: br label [[MERGE]]
; USE_ASSUME: merge:
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: call void @llvm.assume(i1 true) [ "dereferenceable"(i32* [[P]], i64 4), "nonnull"(i32* [[P]]), "align"(i32* [[P]], i64 4) ]
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: ret i32 0
;
call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 4, i32* %p)
call void @clobber()
%v1 = load i32, i32* %p
br i1 %cnd, label %merge, label %taken
taken:
call void @clobber()
br label %merge
merge:
%v2 = load i32, i32* %p
%sub = sub i32 %v1, %v2
ret i32 %sub
}
define void @test_dse_before_load(i32* %p, i1 %cnd) {
; NO_ASSUME-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_dse_before_load
; NO_ASSUME-SAME: (i32* [[P:%.*]], i1 [[CND:%.*]])
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 4, i32* [[P]])
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: [[V1:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[P]], align 4
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: call void @clobber()
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: ret void
;
; USE_ASSUME-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_dse_before_load
; USE_ASSUME-SAME: (i32* [[P:%.*]], i1 [[CND:%.*]])
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 4, i32* [[P]])
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: [[V1:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[P]], align 4
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: call void @clobber()
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: call void @llvm.assume(i1 true) [ "dereferenceable"(i32* [[P]], i64 4), "nonnull"(i32* [[P]]), "align"(i32* [[P]], i64 4) ]
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: ret void
;
call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 4, i32* %p)
%v1 = load i32, i32* %p
call void @clobber()
store i32 %v1, i32* %p
ret void
}
define void @test_dse_after_load(i32* %p, i1 %cnd) {
; NO_ASSUME-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_dse_after_load
; NO_ASSUME-SAME: (i32* [[P:%.*]], i1 [[CND:%.*]])
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: [[V1:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[P]], align 4
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 4, i32* [[P]])
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: call void @clobber()
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: ret void
;
; USE_ASSUME-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_dse_after_load
; USE_ASSUME-SAME: (i32* [[P:%.*]], i1 [[CND:%.*]])
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: [[V1:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[P]], align 4
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 4, i32* [[P]])
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: call void @clobber()
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: call void @llvm.assume(i1 true) [ "dereferenceable"(i32* [[P]], i64 4), "nonnull"(i32* [[P]]), "align"(i32* [[P]], i64 4) ]
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: ret void
;
%v1 = load i32, i32* %p
call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 4, i32* %p)
call void @clobber()
store i32 %v1, i32* %p
ret void
}
; In this case, we have a false negative since MemoryLocation is implicitly
; typed due to the user of a Value to represent the address. Note that other
; passes will canonicalize away the bitcasts in this example.
define i32 @test_false_negative_types(i32* %p) {
; CHECK-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_false_negative_types
; CHECK-SAME: (i32* [[P:%.*]])
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 4, i32* [[P]])
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; CHECK-NEXT: [[V1:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[P]], align 4
; CHECK-NEXT: call void @clobber()
; CHECK-NEXT: [[PF:%.*]] = bitcast i32* [[P]] to float*
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; CHECK-NEXT: [[V2F:%.*]] = load float, float* [[PF]], align 4
; CHECK-NEXT: [[V2:%.*]] = bitcast float [[V2F]] to i32
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SUB:%.*]] = sub i32 [[V1]], [[V2]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[SUB]]
;
call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 4, i32* %p)
%v1 = load i32, i32* %p
call void @clobber()
%pf = bitcast i32* %p to float*
%v2f = load float, float* %pf
%v2 = bitcast float %v2f to i32
%sub = sub i32 %v1, %v2
ret i32 %sub
}
define i32 @test_negative_size1(i32* %p) {
; CHECK-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_negative_size1
; CHECK-SAME: (i32* [[P:%.*]])
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 3, i32* [[P]])
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; CHECK-NEXT: [[V1:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[P]], align 4
; CHECK-NEXT: call void @clobber()
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; CHECK-NEXT: [[V2:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[P]], align 4
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SUB:%.*]] = sub i32 [[V1]], [[V2]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[SUB]]
;
call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 3, i32* %p)
%v1 = load i32, i32* %p
call void @clobber()
%v2 = load i32, i32* %p
%sub = sub i32 %v1, %v2
ret i32 %sub
}
define i32 @test_negative_size2(i32* %p) {
; CHECK-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_negative_size2
; CHECK-SAME: (i32* [[P:%.*]])
; CHECK-NEXT: [[TMP1:%.*]] = call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 0, i32* [[P]])
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; CHECK-NEXT: [[V1:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[P]], align 4
; CHECK-NEXT: call void @clobber()
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; CHECK-NEXT: [[V2:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[P]], align 4
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SUB:%.*]] = sub i32 [[V1]], [[V2]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[SUB]]
;
call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 0, i32* %p)
%v1 = load i32, i32* %p
call void @clobber()
%v2 = load i32, i32* %p
%sub = sub i32 %v1, %v2
ret i32 %sub
}
define i32 @test_negative_scope(i32* %p) {
; CHECK-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_negative_scope
; CHECK-SAME: (i32* [[P:%.*]])
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SCOPE:%.*]] = call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 4, i32* [[P]])
; CHECK-NEXT: call void @llvm.invariant.end.p0i32({}* [[SCOPE]], i64 4, i32* [[P]])
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; CHECK-NEXT: [[V1:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[P]], align 4
; CHECK-NEXT: call void @clobber()
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; CHECK-NEXT: [[V2:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[P]], align 4
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SUB:%.*]] = sub i32 [[V1]], [[V2]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[SUB]]
;
%scope = call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 4, i32* %p)
call void @llvm.invariant.end.p0i32({}* %scope, i64 4, i32* %p)
%v1 = load i32, i32* %p
call void @clobber()
%v2 = load i32, i32* %p
%sub = sub i32 %v1, %v2
ret i32 %sub
}
define i32 @test_false_negative_scope(i32* %p) {
; CHECK-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_false_negative_scope
; CHECK-SAME: (i32* [[P:%.*]])
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SCOPE:%.*]] = call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 4, i32* [[P]])
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; CHECK-NEXT: [[V1:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[P]], align 4
; CHECK-NEXT: call void @clobber()
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; CHECK-NEXT: [[V2:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[P]], align 4
; CHECK-NEXT: call void @llvm.invariant.end.p0i32({}* [[SCOPE]], i64 4, i32* [[P]])
; CHECK-NEXT: [[SUB:%.*]] = sub i32 [[V1]], [[V2]]
; CHECK-NEXT: ret i32 [[SUB]]
;
%scope = call {}* @llvm.invariant.start.p0i32(i64 4, i32* %p)
%v1 = load i32, i32* %p
call void @clobber()
%v2 = load i32, i32* %p
call void @llvm.invariant.end.p0i32({}* %scope, i64 4, i32* %p)
%sub = sub i32 %v1, %v2
ret i32 %sub
}
; Invariant load defact starts an invariant.start scope of the appropriate size
define i32 @test_invariant_load_scope(i32* %p) {
; NO_ASSUME-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_invariant_load_scope
; NO_ASSUME-SAME: (i32* [[P:%.*]])
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: [[V1:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[P]], align 4, !invariant.load !0
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: call void @clobber()
; NO_ASSUME-NEXT: ret i32 0
;
; USE_ASSUME-LABEL: define {{[^@]+}}@test_invariant_load_scope
; USE_ASSUME-SAME: (i32* [[P:%.*]])
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: [[V1:%.*]] = load i32, i32* [[P]], align 4, !invariant.load !0
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: call void @clobber()
Infer alignment of unmarked loads in IR/bitcode parsing. For IR generated by a compiler, this is really simple: you just take the datalayout from the beginning of the file, and apply it to all the IR later in the file. For optimization testcases that don't care about the datalayout, this is also really simple: we just use the default datalayout. The complexity here comes from the fact that some LLVM tools allow overriding the datalayout: some tools have an explicit flag for this, some tools will infer a datalayout based on the code generation target. Supporting this properly required plumbing through a bunch of new machinery: we want to allow overriding the datalayout after the datalayout is parsed from the file, but before we use any information from it. Therefore, IR/bitcode parsing now has a callback to allow tools to compute the datalayout at the appropriate time. Not sure if I covered all the LLVM tools that want to use the callback. (clang? lli? Misc IR manipulation tools like llvm-link?). But this is at least enough for all the LLVM regression tests, and IR without a datalayout is not something frontends should generate. This change had some sort of weird effects for certain CodeGen regression tests: if the datalayout is overridden with a datalayout with a different program or stack address space, we now parse IR based on the overridden datalayout, instead of the one written in the file (or the default one, if none is specified). This broke a few AVR tests, and one AMDGPU test. Outside the CodeGen tests I mentioned, the test changes are all just fixing CHECK lines and moving around datalayout lines in weird places. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78403
2020-05-15 03:59:45 +08:00
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: call void @llvm.assume(i1 true) [ "dereferenceable"(i32* [[P]], i64 4), "nonnull"(i32* [[P]]), "align"(i32* [[P]], i64 4) ]
; USE_ASSUME-NEXT: ret i32 0
;
%v1 = load i32, i32* %p, !invariant.load !{}
call void @clobber()
%v2 = load i32, i32* %p
%sub = sub i32 %v1, %v2
ret i32 %sub
}