maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/clang/test/CodeGen/thinlto-backend-option.ll

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

18 lines
866 B
LLVM
Raw Normal View History

Remove -cc1 option "-backend-option". It means the same thing as -mllvm; there isn't any reason to have two options which do the same thing. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45109 llvm-svn: 329965
2018-04-13 06:21:36 +08:00
; Test to ensure -mllvm work when invoking the ThinLTO backend path.
Parse backend options during thinlto backend compile actions llvm-svn: 300741
2017-04-20 04:08:21 +08:00
; This test uses a non-existent backend option to test that backend options are
; being parsed. While it's more important that the existing options are parsed
; than that this error is produced, this provides a reliable way to test this
; scenario independent of any particular backend options that may exist now or
; in the future.
XFAIL thinlto testcases on AIX In D100350, we switched off thinLTO on the AIX OS. So, XFAIL tests that invoke clang with -flto=thin on AIX.
2021-04-26 22:18:51 +08:00
; XFAIL: aix
Parse backend options during thinlto backend compile actions llvm-svn: 300741
2017-04-20 04:08:21 +08:00
; RUN: %clang -flto=thin -c -o %t.o %s
; RUN: llvm-lto -thinlto -o %t %t.o
Remove -cc1 option "-backend-option". It means the same thing as -mllvm; there isn't any reason to have two options which do the same thing. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45109 llvm-svn: 329965
2018-04-13 06:21:36 +08:00
; RUN: not %clang_cc1 -x ir %t.o -fthinlto-index=%t.thinlto.bc -mllvm -nonexistent -emit-obj -o /dev/null 2>&1 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=UNKNOWN
; UNKNOWN: clang (LLVM option parsing): Unknown command line argument '-nonexistent'
Parse backend options during thinlto backend compile actions llvm-svn: 300741
2017-04-20 04:08:21 +08:00
Be more strict when checking the -flto option value Summary: It seems -flto must be either "thin" or "full". I think the use of containValue is just a typo. Reviewers: ruiu, tejohnson Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34055 llvm-svn: 305392
2017-06-14 23:37:11 +08:00
; RUN: not %clang_cc1 -flto=thinfoo 2>&1 | FileCheck %s -check-prefix=INVALID
; INVALID: error: invalid value 'thinfoo' in '-flto=thinfoo'