maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/clang/test/SemaObjC/class-extension-dup-methods.m

16 lines
437 B
Mathematica
Raw Normal View History

Update tests to use %clang_cc1 instead of 'clang-cc' or 'clang -cc1'. - This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable" which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set a default target). llvm-svn: 91446
2009-12-16 04:14:24 +08:00
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
Check for duplicate declaration of method of a class in its extension. llvm-svn: 65854
2009-03-03 03:05:07 +08:00
@interface Foo
Modify how the -verify flag works. Currently, the verification string and diagnostic message are compared. If either is a substring of the other, then no error is given. This gives rise to an unexpected case: // expect-error{{candidate function has different number of parameters}} will match the following error messages from Clang: candidate function has different number of parameters (expected 1 but has 2) candidate function has different number of parameters It will also match these other error messages: candidate function function has different number of parameters number of parameters This patch will change so that the verification string must be a substring of the diagnostic message before accepting. Also, all the failing tests from this change have been corrected. Some stats from this cleanup: 87 - removed extra spaces around verification strings 70 - wording updates to diagnostics 40 - extra leading or trailing characters (typos, unmatched parens or quotes) 35 - diagnostic level was included (error:, warning:, or note:) 18 - flag name put in the warning (-Wprotocol) llvm-svn: 146619
2011-12-15 08:38:15 +08:00
- (int) garf; // expected-note {{previous declaration is here}}
Check for duplicate declaration of method of a class in its extension. llvm-svn: 65854
2009-03-03 03:05:07 +08:00
- (int) OK;
Modify how the -verify flag works. Currently, the verification string and diagnostic message are compared. If either is a substring of the other, then no error is given. This gives rise to an unexpected case: // expect-error{{candidate function has different number of parameters}} will match the following error messages from Clang: candidate function has different number of parameters (expected 1 but has 2) candidate function has different number of parameters It will also match these other error messages: candidate function function has different number of parameters number of parameters This patch will change so that the verification string must be a substring of the diagnostic message before accepting. Also, all the failing tests from this change have been corrected. Some stats from this cleanup: 87 - removed extra spaces around verification strings 70 - wording updates to diagnostics 40 - extra leading or trailing characters (typos, unmatched parens or quotes) 35 - diagnostic level was included (error:, warning:, or note:) 18 - flag name put in the warning (-Wprotocol) llvm-svn: 146619
2011-12-15 08:38:15 +08:00
+ (int) cgarf; // expected-note {{previous declaration is here}}
Check for duplicate declaration of method of a class in its extension. llvm-svn: 65854
2009-03-03 03:05:07 +08:00
- (int) InstMeth;
@end
@interface Foo()
- (void) garf; // expected-error {{duplicate declaration of method 'garf'}}
+ (void) cgarf; // expected-error {{duplicate declaration of method 'cgarf'}}
+ (int) InstMeth;
- (int) OK;
@end