2017-10-20 05:37:38 +08:00
|
|
|
//===-- RISCVFrameLowering.cpp - RISCV Frame Information ------------------===//
|
|
|
|
//
|
2019-01-19 16:50:56 +08:00
|
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
2017-10-20 05:37:38 +08:00
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// This file contains the RISCV implementation of TargetFrameLowering class.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "RISCVFrameLowering.h"
|
2018-01-11 03:41:03 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "RISCVMachineFunctionInfo.h"
|
2017-10-20 05:37:38 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "RISCVSubtarget.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineFrameInfo.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineFunction.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineInstrBuilder.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/CodeGen/MachineRegisterInfo.h"
|
2018-01-11 19:17:19 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "llvm/CodeGen/RegisterScavenging.h"
|
2019-10-23 04:25:01 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "llvm/IR/DiagnosticInfo.h"
|
2019-06-12 11:04:22 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "llvm/MC/MCDwarf.h"
|
2017-10-20 05:37:38 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
using namespace llvm;
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-18 19:34:02 +08:00
|
|
|
bool RISCVFrameLowering::hasFP(const MachineFunction &MF) const {
|
|
|
|
const TargetRegisterInfo *RegInfo = MF.getSubtarget().getRegisterInfo();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const MachineFrameInfo &MFI = MF.getFrameInfo();
|
|
|
|
return MF.getTarget().Options.DisableFramePointerElim(MF) ||
|
|
|
|
RegInfo->needsStackRealignment(MF) || MFI.hasVarSizedObjects() ||
|
|
|
|
MFI.isFrameAddressTaken();
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-10-20 05:37:38 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2019-10-15 15:11:35 +08:00
|
|
|
bool RISCVFrameLowering::hasBP(const MachineFunction &MF) const {
|
|
|
|
const MachineFrameInfo &MFI = MF.getFrameInfo();
|
|
|
|
const TargetRegisterInfo *TRI = STI.getRegisterInfo();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return MFI.hasVarSizedObjects() && TRI->needsStackRealignment(MF);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-12-11 20:34:11 +08:00
|
|
|
// Determines the size of the frame and maximum call frame size.
|
|
|
|
void RISCVFrameLowering::determineFrameLayout(MachineFunction &MF) const {
|
|
|
|
MachineFrameInfo &MFI = MF.getFrameInfo();
|
|
|
|
const RISCVRegisterInfo *RI = STI.getRegisterInfo();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Get the number of bytes to allocate from the FrameInfo.
|
|
|
|
uint64_t FrameSize = MFI.getStackSize();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Get the alignment.
|
[RISCV] Minimal stack realignment support
Summary:
Currently the RISC-V backend does not realign the stack. This can be an issue even for the RV32I/RV64I ABIs (where the stack is 16-byte aligned), though is rare. It will be much more comment with RV32E (though the alignment requirements for common data types remain under-documented...).
This patch adds minimal support for stack realignment. It should cope with large realignments. It will error out if the stack needs realignment and variable sized objects are present.
It feels like a lot of the code like getFrameIndexReference and determineFrameLayout could be refactored somehow, as right now it feels fiddly and brittle. We also seem to allocate a lot more memory than GCC does for equivalent C code.
Reviewers: asb
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: wwei, jrtc27, s.egerton, MaskRay, Jim, lenary, hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62007
llvm-svn: 368300
2019-08-08 22:40:54 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned StackAlign = getStackAlignment();
|
|
|
|
if (RI->needsStackRealignment(MF)) {
|
|
|
|
unsigned MaxStackAlign = std::max(StackAlign, MFI.getMaxAlignment());
|
|
|
|
FrameSize += (MaxStackAlign - StackAlign);
|
|
|
|
StackAlign = MaxStackAlign;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Set Max Call Frame Size
|
|
|
|
uint64_t MaxCallSize = alignTo(MFI.getMaxCallFrameSize(), StackAlign);
|
|
|
|
MFI.setMaxCallFrameSize(MaxCallSize);
|
2017-12-11 20:34:11 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Make sure the frame is aligned.
|
|
|
|
FrameSize = alignTo(FrameSize, StackAlign);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Update frame info.
|
|
|
|
MFI.setStackSize(FrameSize);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void RISCVFrameLowering::adjustReg(MachineBasicBlock &MBB,
|
|
|
|
MachineBasicBlock::iterator MBBI,
|
2019-08-16 22:27:50 +08:00
|
|
|
const DebugLoc &DL, Register DestReg,
|
|
|
|
Register SrcReg, int64_t Val,
|
2017-12-11 20:34:11 +08:00
|
|
|
MachineInstr::MIFlag Flag) const {
|
2018-01-11 03:53:46 +08:00
|
|
|
MachineRegisterInfo &MRI = MBB.getParent()->getRegInfo();
|
2017-12-11 20:34:11 +08:00
|
|
|
const RISCVInstrInfo *TII = STI.getInstrInfo();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (DestReg == SrcReg && Val == 0)
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-11 03:53:46 +08:00
|
|
|
if (isInt<12>(Val)) {
|
|
|
|
BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, TII->get(RISCV::ADDI), DestReg)
|
|
|
|
.addReg(SrcReg)
|
|
|
|
.addImm(Val)
|
|
|
|
.setMIFlag(Flag);
|
2019-09-13 12:03:32 +08:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
2018-01-11 03:53:46 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned Opc = RISCV::ADD;
|
|
|
|
bool isSub = Val < 0;
|
|
|
|
if (isSub) {
|
|
|
|
Val = -Val;
|
|
|
|
Opc = RISCV::SUB;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
[risc-v] Apply llvm-prefer-register-over-unsigned from clang-tidy to LLVM
Summary:
This clang-tidy check is looking for unsigned integer variables whose initializer
starts with an implicit cast from llvm::Register and changes the type of the
variable to llvm::Register (dropping the llvm:: where possible).
Depends on D65919
Reviewers: lenary
Subscribers: jholewinski, MatzeB, qcolombet, dschuff, jyknight, dylanmckay, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, sbc100, jgravelle-google, kristof.beyls, hiraditya, aheejin, kbarton, fedor.sergeev, javed.absar, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, tpr, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Petar.Avramovic, asbirlea, Jim, s.egerton, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision for full review was: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65962
llvm-svn: 368629
2019-08-13 06:41:02 +08:00
|
|
|
Register ScratchReg = MRI.createVirtualRegister(&RISCV::GPRRegClass);
|
2019-09-13 12:03:32 +08:00
|
|
|
TII->movImm(MBB, MBBI, DL, ScratchReg, Val, Flag);
|
2018-01-11 03:53:46 +08:00
|
|
|
BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, TII->get(Opc), DestReg)
|
|
|
|
.addReg(SrcReg)
|
|
|
|
.addReg(ScratchReg, RegState::Kill)
|
|
|
|
.setMIFlag(Flag);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-12-11 20:34:11 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Returns the register used to hold the frame pointer.
|
2019-08-16 22:27:50 +08:00
|
|
|
static Register getFPReg(const RISCVSubtarget &STI) { return RISCV::X8; }
|
2017-12-11 20:34:11 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Returns the register used to hold the stack pointer.
|
2019-08-16 22:27:50 +08:00
|
|
|
static Register getSPReg(const RISCVSubtarget &STI) { return RISCV::X2; }
|
2017-12-11 20:34:11 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2017-10-20 05:37:38 +08:00
|
|
|
void RISCVFrameLowering::emitPrologue(MachineFunction &MF,
|
2017-12-11 20:34:11 +08:00
|
|
|
MachineBasicBlock &MBB) const {
|
|
|
|
MachineFrameInfo &MFI = MF.getFrameInfo();
|
2018-01-11 03:41:03 +08:00
|
|
|
auto *RVFI = MF.getInfo<RISCVMachineFunctionInfo>();
|
2019-06-12 11:04:22 +08:00
|
|
|
const RISCVRegisterInfo *RI = STI.getRegisterInfo();
|
|
|
|
const RISCVInstrInfo *TII = STI.getInstrInfo();
|
2017-12-11 20:34:11 +08:00
|
|
|
MachineBasicBlock::iterator MBBI = MBB.begin();
|
|
|
|
|
2019-08-16 22:27:50 +08:00
|
|
|
Register FPReg = getFPReg(STI);
|
|
|
|
Register SPReg = getSPReg(STI);
|
2019-10-15 15:11:35 +08:00
|
|
|
Register BPReg = RISCVABI::getBPReg();
|
2017-12-11 20:34:11 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Debug location must be unknown since the first debug location is used
|
|
|
|
// to determine the end of the prologue.
|
|
|
|
DebugLoc DL;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Determine the correct frame layout
|
|
|
|
determineFrameLayout(MF);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// FIXME (note copied from Lanai): This appears to be overallocating. Needs
|
|
|
|
// investigation. Get the number of bytes to allocate from the FrameInfo.
|
|
|
|
uint64_t StackSize = MFI.getStackSize();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Early exit if there is no need to allocate on the stack
|
|
|
|
if (StackSize == 0 && !MFI.adjustsStack())
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
2019-10-23 04:25:01 +08:00
|
|
|
// If the stack pointer has been marked as reserved, then produce an error if
|
|
|
|
// the frame requires stack allocation
|
|
|
|
if (STI.isRegisterReservedByUser(SPReg))
|
|
|
|
MF.getFunction().getContext().diagnose(DiagnosticInfoUnsupported{
|
|
|
|
MF.getFunction(), "Stack pointer required, but has been reserved."});
|
|
|
|
|
[RISCV] Split SP adjustment to reduce the offset of callee saved register spill and restore
We would like to split the SP adjustment to reduce the instructions in
prologue and epilogue as the following case. In this way, the offset of
the callee saved register could fit in a single store.
add sp,sp,-2032
sw ra,2028(sp)
sw s0,2024(sp)
sw s1,2020(sp)
sw s3,2012(sp)
sw s4,2008(sp)
add sp,sp,-64
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68011
llvm-svn: 373688
2019-10-04 10:00:57 +08:00
|
|
|
uint64_t FirstSPAdjustAmount = getFirstSPAdjustAmount(MF);
|
|
|
|
// Split the SP adjustment to reduce the offsets of callee saved spill.
|
|
|
|
if (FirstSPAdjustAmount)
|
|
|
|
StackSize = FirstSPAdjustAmount;
|
|
|
|
|
2017-12-11 20:34:11 +08:00
|
|
|
// Allocate space on the stack if necessary.
|
|
|
|
adjustReg(MBB, MBBI, DL, SPReg, SPReg, -StackSize, MachineInstr::FrameSetup);
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-12 11:04:22 +08:00
|
|
|
// Emit ".cfi_def_cfa_offset StackSize"
|
|
|
|
unsigned CFIIndex = MF.addFrameInst(
|
|
|
|
MCCFIInstruction::createDefCfaOffset(nullptr, -StackSize));
|
|
|
|
BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, TII->get(TargetOpcode::CFI_INSTRUCTION))
|
|
|
|
.addCFIIndex(CFIIndex);
|
|
|
|
|
2017-12-11 20:34:11 +08:00
|
|
|
// The frame pointer is callee-saved, and code has been generated for us to
|
|
|
|
// save it to the stack. We need to skip over the storing of callee-saved
|
|
|
|
// registers as the frame pointer must be modified after it has been saved
|
|
|
|
// to the stack, not before.
|
|
|
|
// FIXME: assumes exactly one instruction is used to save each callee-saved
|
|
|
|
// register.
|
|
|
|
const std::vector<CalleeSavedInfo> &CSI = MFI.getCalleeSavedInfo();
|
|
|
|
std::advance(MBBI, CSI.size());
|
|
|
|
|
2019-06-12 11:04:22 +08:00
|
|
|
// Iterate over list of callee-saved registers and emit .cfi_offset
|
|
|
|
// directives.
|
|
|
|
for (const auto &Entry : CSI) {
|
|
|
|
int64_t Offset = MFI.getObjectOffset(Entry.getFrameIdx());
|
2019-08-16 22:27:50 +08:00
|
|
|
Register Reg = Entry.getReg();
|
2019-06-12 11:04:22 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned CFIIndex = MF.addFrameInst(MCCFIInstruction::createOffset(
|
|
|
|
nullptr, RI->getDwarfRegNum(Reg, true), Offset));
|
|
|
|
BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, TII->get(TargetOpcode::CFI_INSTRUCTION))
|
|
|
|
.addCFIIndex(CFIIndex);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-12-11 20:34:11 +08:00
|
|
|
// Generate new FP.
|
2019-06-12 11:04:22 +08:00
|
|
|
if (hasFP(MF)) {
|
2019-10-23 04:25:01 +08:00
|
|
|
if (STI.isRegisterReservedByUser(FPReg))
|
|
|
|
MF.getFunction().getContext().diagnose(DiagnosticInfoUnsupported{
|
|
|
|
MF.getFunction(), "Frame pointer required, but has been reserved."});
|
|
|
|
|
2018-01-18 19:34:02 +08:00
|
|
|
adjustReg(MBB, MBBI, DL, FPReg, SPReg,
|
|
|
|
StackSize - RVFI->getVarArgsSaveSize(), MachineInstr::FrameSetup);
|
2019-06-12 11:04:22 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-02-03 13:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
// Emit ".cfi_def_cfa $fp, -RVFI->getVarArgsSaveSize()"
|
2019-06-12 11:04:22 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned CFIIndex = MF.addFrameInst(MCCFIInstruction::createDefCfa(
|
2020-02-03 13:52:13 +08:00
|
|
|
nullptr, RI->getDwarfRegNum(FPReg, true), -RVFI->getVarArgsSaveSize()));
|
2019-06-12 11:04:22 +08:00
|
|
|
BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, TII->get(TargetOpcode::CFI_INSTRUCTION))
|
|
|
|
.addCFIIndex(CFIIndex);
|
[RISCV] Split SP adjustment to reduce the offset of callee saved register spill and restore
We would like to split the SP adjustment to reduce the instructions in
prologue and epilogue as the following case. In this way, the offset of
the callee saved register could fit in a single store.
add sp,sp,-2032
sw ra,2028(sp)
sw s0,2024(sp)
sw s1,2020(sp)
sw s3,2012(sp)
sw s4,2008(sp)
add sp,sp,-64
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68011
llvm-svn: 373688
2019-10-04 10:00:57 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
[RISCV] Minimal stack realignment support
Summary:
Currently the RISC-V backend does not realign the stack. This can be an issue even for the RV32I/RV64I ABIs (where the stack is 16-byte aligned), though is rare. It will be much more comment with RV32E (though the alignment requirements for common data types remain under-documented...).
This patch adds minimal support for stack realignment. It should cope with large realignments. It will error out if the stack needs realignment and variable sized objects are present.
It feels like a lot of the code like getFrameIndexReference and determineFrameLayout could be refactored somehow, as right now it feels fiddly and brittle. We also seem to allocate a lot more memory than GCC does for equivalent C code.
Reviewers: asb
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: wwei, jrtc27, s.egerton, MaskRay, Jim, lenary, hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62007
llvm-svn: 368300
2019-08-08 22:40:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
[RISCV] Split SP adjustment to reduce the offset of callee saved register spill and restore
We would like to split the SP adjustment to reduce the instructions in
prologue and epilogue as the following case. In this way, the offset of
the callee saved register could fit in a single store.
add sp,sp,-2032
sw ra,2028(sp)
sw s0,2024(sp)
sw s1,2020(sp)
sw s3,2012(sp)
sw s4,2008(sp)
add sp,sp,-64
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68011
llvm-svn: 373688
2019-10-04 10:00:57 +08:00
|
|
|
// Emit the second SP adjustment after saving callee saved registers.
|
|
|
|
if (FirstSPAdjustAmount) {
|
|
|
|
uint64_t SecondSPAdjustAmount = MFI.getStackSize() - FirstSPAdjustAmount;
|
|
|
|
assert(SecondSPAdjustAmount > 0 &&
|
|
|
|
"SecondSPAdjustAmount should be greater than zero");
|
|
|
|
adjustReg(MBB, MBBI, DL, SPReg, SPReg, -SecondSPAdjustAmount,
|
|
|
|
MachineInstr::FrameSetup);
|
2019-11-11 00:04:43 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// If we are using a frame-pointer, and thus emitted ".cfi_def_cfa fp, 0",
|
|
|
|
// don't emit an sp-based .cfi_def_cfa_offset
|
|
|
|
if (!hasFP(MF)) {
|
|
|
|
// Emit ".cfi_def_cfa_offset StackSize"
|
|
|
|
unsigned CFIIndex = MF.addFrameInst(
|
|
|
|
MCCFIInstruction::createDefCfaOffset(nullptr, -MFI.getStackSize()));
|
|
|
|
BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, TII->get(TargetOpcode::CFI_INSTRUCTION))
|
|
|
|
.addCFIIndex(CFIIndex);
|
|
|
|
}
|
[RISCV] Split SP adjustment to reduce the offset of callee saved register spill and restore
We would like to split the SP adjustment to reduce the instructions in
prologue and epilogue as the following case. In this way, the offset of
the callee saved register could fit in a single store.
add sp,sp,-2032
sw ra,2028(sp)
sw s0,2024(sp)
sw s1,2020(sp)
sw s3,2012(sp)
sw s4,2008(sp)
add sp,sp,-64
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68011
llvm-svn: 373688
2019-10-04 10:00:57 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (hasFP(MF)) {
|
[RISCV] Minimal stack realignment support
Summary:
Currently the RISC-V backend does not realign the stack. This can be an issue even for the RV32I/RV64I ABIs (where the stack is 16-byte aligned), though is rare. It will be much more comment with RV32E (though the alignment requirements for common data types remain under-documented...).
This patch adds minimal support for stack realignment. It should cope with large realignments. It will error out if the stack needs realignment and variable sized objects are present.
It feels like a lot of the code like getFrameIndexReference and determineFrameLayout could be refactored somehow, as right now it feels fiddly and brittle. We also seem to allocate a lot more memory than GCC does for equivalent C code.
Reviewers: asb
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: wwei, jrtc27, s.egerton, MaskRay, Jim, lenary, hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62007
llvm-svn: 368300
2019-08-08 22:40:54 +08:00
|
|
|
// Realign Stack
|
|
|
|
const RISCVRegisterInfo *RI = STI.getRegisterInfo();
|
|
|
|
if (RI->needsStackRealignment(MF)) {
|
|
|
|
unsigned MaxAlignment = MFI.getMaxAlignment();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
const RISCVInstrInfo *TII = STI.getInstrInfo();
|
|
|
|
if (isInt<12>(-(int)MaxAlignment)) {
|
|
|
|
BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, TII->get(RISCV::ANDI), SPReg)
|
|
|
|
.addReg(SPReg)
|
|
|
|
.addImm(-(int)MaxAlignment);
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
unsigned ShiftAmount = countTrailingZeros(MaxAlignment);
|
2019-08-16 22:27:50 +08:00
|
|
|
Register VR =
|
[RISCV] Minimal stack realignment support
Summary:
Currently the RISC-V backend does not realign the stack. This can be an issue even for the RV32I/RV64I ABIs (where the stack is 16-byte aligned), though is rare. It will be much more comment with RV32E (though the alignment requirements for common data types remain under-documented...).
This patch adds minimal support for stack realignment. It should cope with large realignments. It will error out if the stack needs realignment and variable sized objects are present.
It feels like a lot of the code like getFrameIndexReference and determineFrameLayout could be refactored somehow, as right now it feels fiddly and brittle. We also seem to allocate a lot more memory than GCC does for equivalent C code.
Reviewers: asb
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: wwei, jrtc27, s.egerton, MaskRay, Jim, lenary, hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62007
llvm-svn: 368300
2019-08-08 22:40:54 +08:00
|
|
|
MF.getRegInfo().createVirtualRegister(&RISCV::GPRRegClass);
|
|
|
|
BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, TII->get(RISCV::SRLI), VR)
|
|
|
|
.addReg(SPReg)
|
|
|
|
.addImm(ShiftAmount);
|
|
|
|
BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, TII->get(RISCV::SLLI), SPReg)
|
|
|
|
.addReg(VR)
|
|
|
|
.addImm(ShiftAmount);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-10-15 15:11:35 +08:00
|
|
|
// FP will be used to restore the frame in the epilogue, so we need
|
|
|
|
// another base register BP to record SP after re-alignment. SP will
|
|
|
|
// track the current stack after allocating variable sized objects.
|
|
|
|
if (hasBP(MF)) {
|
|
|
|
// move BP, SP
|
|
|
|
BuildMI(MBB, MBBI, DL, TII->get(RISCV::ADDI), BPReg)
|
|
|
|
.addReg(SPReg)
|
|
|
|
.addImm(0);
|
|
|
|
}
|
[RISCV] Minimal stack realignment support
Summary:
Currently the RISC-V backend does not realign the stack. This can be an issue even for the RV32I/RV64I ABIs (where the stack is 16-byte aligned), though is rare. It will be much more comment with RV32E (though the alignment requirements for common data types remain under-documented...).
This patch adds minimal support for stack realignment. It should cope with large realignments. It will error out if the stack needs realignment and variable sized objects are present.
It feels like a lot of the code like getFrameIndexReference and determineFrameLayout could be refactored somehow, as right now it feels fiddly and brittle. We also seem to allocate a lot more memory than GCC does for equivalent C code.
Reviewers: asb
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: wwei, jrtc27, s.egerton, MaskRay, Jim, lenary, hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62007
llvm-svn: 368300
2019-08-08 22:40:54 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2019-06-12 11:04:22 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2017-12-11 20:34:11 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2017-10-20 05:37:38 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void RISCVFrameLowering::emitEpilogue(MachineFunction &MF,
|
2017-12-11 20:34:11 +08:00
|
|
|
MachineBasicBlock &MBB) const {
|
|
|
|
const RISCVRegisterInfo *RI = STI.getRegisterInfo();
|
|
|
|
MachineFrameInfo &MFI = MF.getFrameInfo();
|
2018-01-11 03:41:03 +08:00
|
|
|
auto *RVFI = MF.getInfo<RISCVMachineFunctionInfo>();
|
2019-08-16 22:27:50 +08:00
|
|
|
Register FPReg = getFPReg(STI);
|
|
|
|
Register SPReg = getSPReg(STI);
|
2017-12-11 20:34:11 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2020-01-15 02:59:11 +08:00
|
|
|
// Get the insert location for the epilogue. If there were no terminators in
|
|
|
|
// the block, get the last instruction.
|
|
|
|
MachineBasicBlock::iterator MBBI = MBB.end();
|
|
|
|
DebugLoc DL;
|
|
|
|
if (!MBB.empty()) {
|
|
|
|
MBBI = MBB.getFirstTerminator();
|
|
|
|
if (MBBI == MBB.end())
|
|
|
|
MBBI = MBB.getLastNonDebugInstr();
|
|
|
|
DL = MBBI->getDebugLoc();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// If this is not a terminator, the actual insert location should be after the
|
|
|
|
// last instruction.
|
|
|
|
if (!MBBI->isTerminator())
|
|
|
|
MBBI = std::next(MBBI);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-12-11 20:34:11 +08:00
|
|
|
// Skip to before the restores of callee-saved registers
|
|
|
|
// FIXME: assumes exactly one instruction is used to restore each
|
|
|
|
// callee-saved register.
|
[RISCV] Fix std::advance slowness
Summary:
It seems std::advance template is treating "-MFI.getCalleeSavedInfo().size()"
as a large unsigned value", causing slowness.
Thanks to Henrik Gustafsson for reporting the issue.
Reviewers: asb
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: llvm-commits, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, zzheng, edward-jones, mgrang, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, asb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51148
llvm-svn: 340669
2018-08-25 07:13:59 +08:00
|
|
|
auto LastFrameDestroy = std::prev(MBBI, MFI.getCalleeSavedInfo().size());
|
2017-12-11 20:34:11 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
uint64_t StackSize = MFI.getStackSize();
|
2019-06-12 11:04:22 +08:00
|
|
|
uint64_t FPOffset = StackSize - RVFI->getVarArgsSaveSize();
|
2017-12-11 20:34:11 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Restore the stack pointer using the value of the frame pointer. Only
|
|
|
|
// necessary if the stack pointer was modified, meaning the stack size is
|
|
|
|
// unknown.
|
|
|
|
if (RI->needsStackRealignment(MF) || MFI.hasVarSizedObjects()) {
|
2018-01-18 19:34:02 +08:00
|
|
|
assert(hasFP(MF) && "frame pointer should not have been eliminated");
|
2019-06-12 11:04:22 +08:00
|
|
|
adjustReg(MBB, LastFrameDestroy, DL, SPReg, FPReg, -FPOffset,
|
2017-12-11 20:34:11 +08:00
|
|
|
MachineInstr::FrameDestroy);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
[RISCV] Split SP adjustment to reduce the offset of callee saved register spill and restore
We would like to split the SP adjustment to reduce the instructions in
prologue and epilogue as the following case. In this way, the offset of
the callee saved register could fit in a single store.
add sp,sp,-2032
sw ra,2028(sp)
sw s0,2024(sp)
sw s1,2020(sp)
sw s3,2012(sp)
sw s4,2008(sp)
add sp,sp,-64
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68011
llvm-svn: 373688
2019-10-04 10:00:57 +08:00
|
|
|
uint64_t FirstSPAdjustAmount = getFirstSPAdjustAmount(MF);
|
|
|
|
if (FirstSPAdjustAmount) {
|
|
|
|
uint64_t SecondSPAdjustAmount = MFI.getStackSize() - FirstSPAdjustAmount;
|
|
|
|
assert(SecondSPAdjustAmount > 0 &&
|
|
|
|
"SecondSPAdjustAmount should be greater than zero");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
adjustReg(MBB, LastFrameDestroy, DL, SPReg, SPReg, SecondSPAdjustAmount,
|
|
|
|
MachineInstr::FrameDestroy);
|
2019-06-12 11:04:22 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
[RISCV] Split SP adjustment to reduce the offset of callee saved register spill and restore
We would like to split the SP adjustment to reduce the instructions in
prologue and epilogue as the following case. In this way, the offset of
the callee saved register could fit in a single store.
add sp,sp,-2032
sw ra,2028(sp)
sw s0,2024(sp)
sw s1,2020(sp)
sw s3,2012(sp)
sw s4,2008(sp)
add sp,sp,-64
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68011
llvm-svn: 373688
2019-10-04 10:00:57 +08:00
|
|
|
if (FirstSPAdjustAmount)
|
|
|
|
StackSize = FirstSPAdjustAmount;
|
|
|
|
|
2017-12-11 20:34:11 +08:00
|
|
|
// Deallocate stack
|
|
|
|
adjustReg(MBB, MBBI, DL, SPReg, SPReg, StackSize, MachineInstr::FrameDestroy);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-12-11 19:53:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int RISCVFrameLowering::getFrameIndexReference(const MachineFunction &MF,
|
|
|
|
int FI,
|
|
|
|
unsigned &FrameReg) const {
|
|
|
|
const MachineFrameInfo &MFI = MF.getFrameInfo();
|
|
|
|
const TargetRegisterInfo *RI = MF.getSubtarget().getRegisterInfo();
|
2018-01-11 03:41:03 +08:00
|
|
|
const auto *RVFI = MF.getInfo<RISCVMachineFunctionInfo>();
|
2017-12-11 19:53:54 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Callee-saved registers should be referenced relative to the stack
|
|
|
|
// pointer (positive offset), otherwise use the frame pointer (negative
|
|
|
|
// offset).
|
|
|
|
const std::vector<CalleeSavedInfo> &CSI = MFI.getCalleeSavedInfo();
|
|
|
|
int MinCSFI = 0;
|
|
|
|
int MaxCSFI = -1;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
int Offset = MFI.getObjectOffset(FI) - getOffsetOfLocalArea() +
|
|
|
|
MFI.getOffsetAdjustment();
|
|
|
|
|
[RISCV] Split SP adjustment to reduce the offset of callee saved register spill and restore
We would like to split the SP adjustment to reduce the instructions in
prologue and epilogue as the following case. In this way, the offset of
the callee saved register could fit in a single store.
add sp,sp,-2032
sw ra,2028(sp)
sw s0,2024(sp)
sw s1,2020(sp)
sw s3,2012(sp)
sw s4,2008(sp)
add sp,sp,-64
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68011
llvm-svn: 373688
2019-10-04 10:00:57 +08:00
|
|
|
uint64_t FirstSPAdjustAmount = getFirstSPAdjustAmount(MF);
|
|
|
|
|
2017-12-11 19:53:54 +08:00
|
|
|
if (CSI.size()) {
|
|
|
|
MinCSFI = CSI[0].getFrameIdx();
|
|
|
|
MaxCSFI = CSI[CSI.size() - 1].getFrameIdx();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (FI >= MinCSFI && FI <= MaxCSFI) {
|
|
|
|
FrameReg = RISCV::X2;
|
[RISCV] Split SP adjustment to reduce the offset of callee saved register spill and restore
We would like to split the SP adjustment to reduce the instructions in
prologue and epilogue as the following case. In this way, the offset of
the callee saved register could fit in a single store.
add sp,sp,-2032
sw ra,2028(sp)
sw s0,2024(sp)
sw s1,2020(sp)
sw s3,2012(sp)
sw s4,2008(sp)
add sp,sp,-64
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68011
llvm-svn: 373688
2019-10-04 10:00:57 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (FirstSPAdjustAmount)
|
|
|
|
Offset += FirstSPAdjustAmount;
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
Offset += MF.getFrameInfo().getStackSize();
|
2019-10-15 15:11:35 +08:00
|
|
|
} else if (RI->needsStackRealignment(MF) && !MFI.isFixedObjectIndex(FI)) {
|
[RISCV] Minimal stack realignment support
Summary:
Currently the RISC-V backend does not realign the stack. This can be an issue even for the RV32I/RV64I ABIs (where the stack is 16-byte aligned), though is rare. It will be much more comment with RV32E (though the alignment requirements for common data types remain under-documented...).
This patch adds minimal support for stack realignment. It should cope with large realignments. It will error out if the stack needs realignment and variable sized objects are present.
It feels like a lot of the code like getFrameIndexReference and determineFrameLayout could be refactored somehow, as right now it feels fiddly and brittle. We also seem to allocate a lot more memory than GCC does for equivalent C code.
Reviewers: asb
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: wwei, jrtc27, s.egerton, MaskRay, Jim, lenary, hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62007
llvm-svn: 368300
2019-08-08 22:40:54 +08:00
|
|
|
// If the stack was realigned, the frame pointer is set in order to allow
|
2019-10-15 15:11:35 +08:00
|
|
|
// SP to be restored, so we need another base register to record the stack
|
|
|
|
// after realignment.
|
|
|
|
if (hasBP(MF))
|
|
|
|
FrameReg = RISCVABI::getBPReg();
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
FrameReg = RISCV::X2;
|
[RISCV] Minimal stack realignment support
Summary:
Currently the RISC-V backend does not realign the stack. This can be an issue even for the RV32I/RV64I ABIs (where the stack is 16-byte aligned), though is rare. It will be much more comment with RV32E (though the alignment requirements for common data types remain under-documented...).
This patch adds minimal support for stack realignment. It should cope with large realignments. It will error out if the stack needs realignment and variable sized objects are present.
It feels like a lot of the code like getFrameIndexReference and determineFrameLayout could be refactored somehow, as right now it feels fiddly and brittle. We also seem to allocate a lot more memory than GCC does for equivalent C code.
Reviewers: asb
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: wwei, jrtc27, s.egerton, MaskRay, Jim, lenary, hiraditya, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, zzheng, edward-jones, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, rkruppe, PkmX, jocewei, psnobl, benna, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62007
llvm-svn: 368300
2019-08-08 22:40:54 +08:00
|
|
|
Offset += MF.getFrameInfo().getStackSize();
|
2018-01-11 03:41:03 +08:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
FrameReg = RI->getFrameRegister(MF);
|
2018-01-18 19:34:02 +08:00
|
|
|
if (hasFP(MF))
|
|
|
|
Offset += RVFI->getVarArgsSaveSize();
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
Offset += MF.getFrameInfo().getStackSize();
|
2017-12-11 19:53:54 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return Offset;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-12-11 20:34:11 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void RISCVFrameLowering::determineCalleeSaves(MachineFunction &MF,
|
|
|
|
BitVector &SavedRegs,
|
|
|
|
RegScavenger *RS) const {
|
|
|
|
TargetFrameLowering::determineCalleeSaves(MF, SavedRegs, RS);
|
2018-01-18 19:34:02 +08:00
|
|
|
// Unconditionally spill RA and FP only if the function uses a frame
|
|
|
|
// pointer.
|
|
|
|
if (hasFP(MF)) {
|
|
|
|
SavedRegs.set(RISCV::X1);
|
|
|
|
SavedRegs.set(RISCV::X8);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2019-10-15 15:11:35 +08:00
|
|
|
// Mark BP as used if function has dedicated base pointer.
|
|
|
|
if (hasBP(MF))
|
|
|
|
SavedRegs.set(RISCVABI::getBPReg());
|
[RISCV] Add support for _interrupt attribute
- Save/restore only registers that are used.
This includes Callee saved registers and Caller saved registers
(arguments and temporaries) for integer and FP registers.
- If there is a call in the interrupt handler, save/restore all
Caller saved registers (arguments and temporaries) and all FP registers.
- Emit special return instructions depending on "interrupt"
attribute type.
Based on initial patch by Zhaoshi Zheng.
Reviewers: asb
Reviewed By: asb
Subscribers: rkruppe, the_o, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, sabuasal, niosHD, kito-cheng, shiva0217, zzheng, edward-jones, mgrang, rogfer01, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48411
llvm-svn: 338047
2018-07-27 01:49:43 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// If interrupt is enabled and there are calls in the handler,
|
|
|
|
// unconditionally save all Caller-saved registers and
|
|
|
|
// all FP registers, regardless whether they are used.
|
|
|
|
MachineFrameInfo &MFI = MF.getFrameInfo();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (MF.getFunction().hasFnAttribute("interrupt") && MFI.hasCalls()) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static const MCPhysReg CSRegs[] = { RISCV::X1, /* ra */
|
|
|
|
RISCV::X5, RISCV::X6, RISCV::X7, /* t0-t2 */
|
|
|
|
RISCV::X10, RISCV::X11, /* a0-a1, a2-a7 */
|
|
|
|
RISCV::X12, RISCV::X13, RISCV::X14, RISCV::X15, RISCV::X16, RISCV::X17,
|
|
|
|
RISCV::X28, RISCV::X29, RISCV::X30, RISCV::X31, 0 /* t3-t6 */
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (unsigned i = 0; CSRegs[i]; ++i)
|
|
|
|
SavedRegs.set(CSRegs[i]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (MF.getSubtarget<RISCVSubtarget>().hasStdExtD() ||
|
|
|
|
MF.getSubtarget<RISCVSubtarget>().hasStdExtF()) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// If interrupt is enabled, this list contains all FP registers.
|
|
|
|
const MCPhysReg * Regs = MF.getRegInfo().getCalleeSavedRegs();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (unsigned i = 0; Regs[i]; ++i)
|
|
|
|
if (RISCV::FPR32RegClass.contains(Regs[i]) ||
|
|
|
|
RISCV::FPR64RegClass.contains(Regs[i]))
|
|
|
|
SavedRegs.set(Regs[i]);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2017-12-11 20:34:11 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2018-01-11 19:17:19 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void RISCVFrameLowering::processFunctionBeforeFrameFinalized(
|
|
|
|
MachineFunction &MF, RegScavenger *RS) const {
|
|
|
|
const TargetRegisterInfo *RegInfo = MF.getSubtarget().getRegisterInfo();
|
|
|
|
MachineFrameInfo &MFI = MF.getFrameInfo();
|
|
|
|
const TargetRegisterClass *RC = &RISCV::GPRRegClass;
|
|
|
|
// estimateStackSize has been observed to under-estimate the final stack
|
|
|
|
// size, so give ourselves wiggle-room by checking for stack size
|
|
|
|
// representable an 11-bit signed field rather than 12-bits.
|
|
|
|
// FIXME: It may be possible to craft a function with a small stack that
|
|
|
|
// still needs an emergency spill slot for branch relaxation. This case
|
|
|
|
// would currently be missed.
|
|
|
|
if (!isInt<11>(MFI.estimateStackSize(MF))) {
|
|
|
|
int RegScavFI = MFI.CreateStackObject(
|
|
|
|
RegInfo->getSpillSize(*RC), RegInfo->getSpillAlignment(*RC), false);
|
|
|
|
RS->addScavengingFrameIndex(RegScavFI);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2018-03-20 09:39:17 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Not preserve stack space within prologue for outgoing variables when the
|
|
|
|
// function contains variable size objects and let eliminateCallFramePseudoInstr
|
|
|
|
// preserve stack space for it.
|
|
|
|
bool RISCVFrameLowering::hasReservedCallFrame(const MachineFunction &MF) const {
|
|
|
|
return !MF.getFrameInfo().hasVarSizedObjects();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Eliminate ADJCALLSTACKDOWN, ADJCALLSTACKUP pseudo instructions.
|
|
|
|
MachineBasicBlock::iterator RISCVFrameLowering::eliminateCallFramePseudoInstr(
|
|
|
|
MachineFunction &MF, MachineBasicBlock &MBB,
|
|
|
|
MachineBasicBlock::iterator MI) const {
|
2019-08-16 22:27:50 +08:00
|
|
|
Register SPReg = RISCV::X2;
|
2018-03-20 09:39:17 +08:00
|
|
|
DebugLoc DL = MI->getDebugLoc();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!hasReservedCallFrame(MF)) {
|
|
|
|
// If space has not been reserved for a call frame, ADJCALLSTACKDOWN and
|
|
|
|
// ADJCALLSTACKUP must be converted to instructions manipulating the stack
|
|
|
|
// pointer. This is necessary when there is a variable length stack
|
|
|
|
// allocation (e.g. alloca), which means it's not possible to allocate
|
|
|
|
// space for outgoing arguments from within the function prologue.
|
|
|
|
int64_t Amount = MI->getOperand(0).getImm();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (Amount != 0) {
|
|
|
|
// Ensure the stack remains aligned after adjustment.
|
|
|
|
Amount = alignSPAdjust(Amount);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (MI->getOpcode() == RISCV::ADJCALLSTACKDOWN)
|
|
|
|
Amount = -Amount;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
adjustReg(MBB, MI, DL, SPReg, SPReg, Amount, MachineInstr::NoFlags);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return MBB.erase(MI);
|
|
|
|
}
|
[RISCV] Split SP adjustment to reduce the offset of callee saved register spill and restore
We would like to split the SP adjustment to reduce the instructions in
prologue and epilogue as the following case. In this way, the offset of
the callee saved register could fit in a single store.
add sp,sp,-2032
sw ra,2028(sp)
sw s0,2024(sp)
sw s1,2020(sp)
sw s3,2012(sp)
sw s4,2008(sp)
add sp,sp,-64
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68011
llvm-svn: 373688
2019-10-04 10:00:57 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We would like to split the SP adjustment to reduce prologue/epilogue
|
|
|
|
// as following instructions. In this way, the offset of the callee saved
|
|
|
|
// register could fit in a single store.
|
|
|
|
// add sp,sp,-2032
|
|
|
|
// sw ra,2028(sp)
|
|
|
|
// sw s0,2024(sp)
|
|
|
|
// sw s1,2020(sp)
|
|
|
|
// sw s3,2012(sp)
|
|
|
|
// sw s4,2008(sp)
|
|
|
|
// add sp,sp,-64
|
|
|
|
uint64_t
|
|
|
|
RISCVFrameLowering::getFirstSPAdjustAmount(const MachineFunction &MF) const {
|
|
|
|
const MachineFrameInfo &MFI = MF.getFrameInfo();
|
|
|
|
const std::vector<CalleeSavedInfo> &CSI = MFI.getCalleeSavedInfo();
|
|
|
|
uint64_t StackSize = MFI.getStackSize();
|
|
|
|
uint64_t StackAlign = getStackAlignment();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// FIXME: Disable SplitSPAdjust if save-restore libcall enabled when the patch
|
|
|
|
// landing. The callee saved registers will be pushed by the
|
|
|
|
// save-restore libcalls, so we don't have to split the SP adjustment
|
|
|
|
// in this case.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// Return the FirstSPAdjustAmount if the StackSize can not fit in signed
|
|
|
|
// 12-bit and there exists a callee saved register need to be pushed.
|
|
|
|
if (!isInt<12>(StackSize) && (CSI.size() > 0)) {
|
|
|
|
// FirstSPAdjustAmount is choosed as (2048 - StackAlign)
|
|
|
|
// because 2048 will cause sp = sp + 2048 in epilogue split into
|
|
|
|
// multi-instructions. The offset smaller than 2048 can fit in signle
|
|
|
|
// load/store instruction and we have to stick with the stack alignment.
|
|
|
|
// 2048 is 16-byte alignment. The stack alignment for RV32 and RV64 is 16,
|
|
|
|
// for RV32E is 4. So (2048 - StackAlign) will satisfy the stack alignment.
|
|
|
|
return 2048 - StackAlign;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
|
|
}
|