llvm-project/clang/test/Parser/declarators.c

100 lines
2.8 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -fsyntax-only -verify -pedantic
2006-08-07 02:22:00 +08:00
extern int a1[];
2006-08-07 02:22:00 +08:00
void f0();
void f1(int [*]);
void f2(int [const *]);
void f3(int [volatile const*]);
int f4(*XX)(void); /* expected-error {{cannot return}} expected-warning {{type specifier missing, defaults to 'int'}} */
2006-08-07 02:22:00 +08:00
char ((((*X))));
void (*signal(int, void (*)(int)))(int);
int aaaa, ***C, * const D, B(int);
2006-08-07 02:22:00 +08:00
int *A;
struct str;
2009-07-22 08:43:08 +08:00
void test2(int *P, int A) {
struct str;
// Hard case for array decl, not Array[*].
2006-08-13 02:40:31 +08:00
int Array[*(int*)P+A];
}
typedef int atype;
2009-07-22 08:43:08 +08:00
void test3(x,
atype /* expected-error {{unexpected type name 'atype': expected identifier}} */
) int x, atype; {}
2009-07-22 08:43:08 +08:00
void test4(x, x) int x; {} /* expected-error {{redefinition of parameter 'x'}} */
// PR3031
int (test5), ; // expected-error {{expected identifier or '('}}
// PR3963 & rdar://6759604 - test error recovery for mistyped "typenames".
foo_t *d; // expected-error {{unknown type name 'foo_t'}}
foo_t a; // expected-error {{unknown type name 'foo_t'}}
int test6() { return a; } // a should be declared.
// Use of tagged type without tag. rdar://6783347
struct xyz { int y; };
enum myenum { ASDFAS };
xyz b; // expected-error {{must use 'struct' tag to refer to type 'xyz'}}
myenum c; // expected-error {{must use 'enum' tag to refer to type 'myenum'}}
float *test7() {
// We should recover 'b' by parsing it with a valid type of "struct xyz", which
// allows us to diagnose other bad things done with y, such as this.
return &b.y; // expected-warning {{incompatible pointer types returning 'int *' from a function with result type 'float *'}}
}
struct xyz test8() { return a; } // a should be be marked invalid, no diag.
// Verify that implicit int still works.
static f; // expected-warning {{type specifier missing, defaults to 'int'}}
static g = 4; // expected-warning {{type specifier missing, defaults to 'int'}}
static h // expected-warning {{type specifier missing, defaults to 'int'}}
Simplify the scheme used for keywords, and change the classification scheme to be more useful. The new scheme introduces a set of categories that should be more readable, and also reflects what we want to consider as an extension more accurately. Specifically, it makes the "what is a keyword" determination accurately reflect whether the keyword is a GNU or Microsoft extension. I also introduced separate flags for keyword aliases; this is useful because the classification of the aliases is mostly unrelated to the classification of the original keyword. This patch treats anything that's in the implementation namespace (prefixed with "__", or "_X" where "X" is any upper-case letter) as a keyword without marking it as an extension. This is consistent with the standards in that an implementation is allowed to define arbitrary extensions in the implementation namespace without violating the standard. This gets rid of all the nasty "extension used" warnings for stuff like __attribute__ in -pedantic mode. We still warn for extensions outside of the the implementation namespace, like typeof. If someone wants to implement -Wextensions or something like that, we could add additional information to the keyword table. This also removes processing for the unused "Boolean" language option; such an extension isn't supported on any other C implementation, so I don't see any point to adding it. The changes to test/CodeGen/inline.c are required because previously, we weren't actually disabling the "inline" keyword in -std=c89 mode. I'll remove Boolean and NoExtensions from LangOptions in a follow-up commit. llvm-svn: 70281
2009-04-28 11:13:54 +08:00
__asm__("foo");
struct test9 {
int x // expected-error {{expected ';' at end of declaration list}}
int y;
int z // expected-warning {{expected ';' at end of declaration list}}
};
// PR6208
struct test10 { int a; } static test10x;
struct test11 { int a; } const test11x;
2010-02-03 09:45:03 +08:00
// PR6216
void test12() {
(void)__builtin_offsetof(struct { char c; int i; }, i);
}
// rdar://7608537
struct test13 { int a; } (test13x);
// <rdar://problem/8044088>
struct X<foo::int> { }; // expected-error{{expected identifier or '('}}
// PR7617 - error recovery on missing ;.
void test14() // expected-error {{expected ';' after top level declarator}}
void test14a();
void *test14b = (void*)test14a; // Make sure test14a didn't get skipped.
// rdar://problem/8358508
long struct X { int x; } test15(); // expected-error {{'long struct' is invalid}}