maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/clang/test/CodeGen/arm-cc.c

26 lines
1.4 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

Tests: check for target availability for target-specific tests. Lots of tests are using an explicit target triple w/o first checking that the target is actually available. Add a REQUIRES clause to a bunch of them. This should hopefully unbreak bots which don't configure w/ all targets enabled. llvm-svn: 159949
2012-07-10 02:34:21 +08:00
// REQUIRES: arm-registered-target
A a new test for my previous patch. llvm-svn: 106120
2010-06-17 02:02:31 +08:00
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple armv7-apple-darwin9 -target-abi apcs-gnu -emit-llvm -w -o - %s | FileCheck -check-prefix=DARWIN-APCS %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple armv7-apple-darwin9 -target-abi aapcs -emit-llvm -w -o - %s | FileCheck -check-prefix=DARWIN-AAPCS %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple arm-none-linux-gnueabi -target-abi apcs-gnu -emit-llvm -w -o - %s | FileCheck -check-prefix=LINUX-APCS %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple arm-none-linux-gnueabi -target-abi aapcs -emit-llvm -w -o - %s | FileCheck -check-prefix=LINUX-AAPCS %s
Add support for musl-libc on ARM Linux. Patch by Lei Zhang! llvm-svn: 273735
2016-06-25 05:35:06 +08:00
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple arm-none-linux-musleabi -target-abi apcs-gnu -emit-llvm -w -o - %s | FileCheck -check-prefix=LINUX-APCS %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple arm-none-linux-musleabi -target-abi aapcs -emit-llvm -w -o - %s | FileCheck -check-prefix=LINUX-AAPCS %s
[CodeGen] Clang does not choose aapcs-vfp calling convention for ARM bare metal target with hard float (EABIHF) Summary: Clang does not detect `aapcs-vfp` for the EABIHF environment. The reason is that only GNUEABIHF is considered while choosing calling convention, EABIHF is ignored. This causes clang to use `aapcs` for EABIHF and add the `arm_aapcscc` specifier to functions in generated IR. The modified `arm-cc.c` test checks that no calling convention specifier is added to functions for EABIHF, which means the default one is used (`CallingConv::ARM_AAPCS_VFP`). Reviewers: rengolin, compnerd, t.p.northover Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, asl, cfe-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20219 llvm-svn: 269419
2016-05-13 22:45:57 +08:00
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple armv7-none-eabihf -target-abi aapcs-vfp -emit-llvm -w -o - %s | FileCheck -check-prefix=BAREMETAL-AAPCS_VFP %s
A a new test for my previous patch. llvm-svn: 106120
2010-06-17 02:02:31 +08:00
CHECK-LABEL-ify some code gen tests to improve diagnostic experience when tests fail. llvm-svn: 188447
2013-08-15 14:47:53 +08:00
// DARWIN-APCS-LABEL: define void @f()
A a new test for my previous patch. llvm-svn: 106120
2010-06-17 02:02:31 +08:00
// DARWIN-APCS: call void @g
CHECK-LABEL-ify some code gen tests to improve diagnostic experience when tests fail. llvm-svn: 188447
2013-08-15 14:47:53 +08:00
// DARWIN-AAPCS-LABEL: define arm_aapcscc void @f()
A a new test for my previous patch. llvm-svn: 106120
2010-06-17 02:02:31 +08:00
// DARWIN-AAPCS: call arm_aapcscc void @g
CHECK-LABEL-ify some code gen tests to improve diagnostic experience when tests fail. llvm-svn: 188447
2013-08-15 14:47:53 +08:00
// LINUX-APCS-LABEL: define arm_apcscc void @f()
A a new test for my previous patch. llvm-svn: 106120
2010-06-17 02:02:31 +08:00
// LINUX-APCS: call arm_apcscc void @g
CHECK-LABEL-ify some code gen tests to improve diagnostic experience when tests fail. llvm-svn: 188447
2013-08-15 14:47:53 +08:00
// LINUX-AAPCS-LABEL: define void @f()
A a new test for my previous patch. llvm-svn: 106120
2010-06-17 02:02:31 +08:00
// LINUX-AAPCS: call void @g
[CodeGen] Clang does not choose aapcs-vfp calling convention for ARM bare metal target with hard float (EABIHF) Summary: Clang does not detect `aapcs-vfp` for the EABIHF environment. The reason is that only GNUEABIHF is considered while choosing calling convention, EABIHF is ignored. This causes clang to use `aapcs` for EABIHF and add the `arm_aapcscc` specifier to functions in generated IR. The modified `arm-cc.c` test checks that no calling convention specifier is added to functions for EABIHF, which means the default one is used (`CallingConv::ARM_AAPCS_VFP`). Reviewers: rengolin, compnerd, t.p.northover Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, asl, cfe-commits Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20219 llvm-svn: 269419
2016-05-13 22:45:57 +08:00
// BAREMETAL-AAPCS_VFP-LABEL: define void @f()
// BAREMETAL-AAPCS_VFP: call void @g
// BAREMETAL-AAPCS_VFP: declare void @g()
A a new test for my previous patch. llvm-svn: 106120
2010-06-17 02:02:31 +08:00
void g(void);
void f(void) {
g();
}