2019-05-24 01:58:48 +08:00
# NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_mir_test_checks.py
2020-08-23 06:00:08 +08:00
# RUN: llc -mtriple=amdgcn-mesa-mesa3d -mcpu=tahiti -run-pass=legalizer -global-isel-abort=0 %s -o - | FileCheck -check-prefix=SI %s
# RUN: llc -mtriple=amdgcn-mesa-mesa3d -mcpu=fiji -run-pass=legalizer -global-isel-abort=0 %s -o - | FileCheck -check-prefix=VI %s
# RUN: llc -mtriple=amdgcn-mesa-mesa3d -mcpu=gfx900 -run-pass=legalizer -global-isel-abort=0 %s -o - | FileCheck -check-prefix=GFX9 %s
2019-05-24 01:58:48 +08:00
---
name: test_smax_s32
body: |
bb.0:
liveins: $vgpr0, $vgpr1
; SI-LABEL: name: test_smax_s32
; SI: [[COPY:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY $vgpr0
; SI: [[COPY1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY $vgpr1
; SI: [[SMAX:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SMAX [[COPY]], [[COPY1]]
; SI: $vgpr0 = COPY [[SMAX]](s32)
; VI-LABEL: name: test_smax_s32
; VI: [[COPY:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY $vgpr0
; VI: [[COPY1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY $vgpr1
; VI: [[SMAX:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SMAX [[COPY]], [[COPY1]]
; VI: $vgpr0 = COPY [[SMAX]](s32)
; GFX9-LABEL: name: test_smax_s32
; GFX9: [[COPY:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY $vgpr0
; GFX9: [[COPY1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY $vgpr1
; GFX9: [[SMAX:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SMAX [[COPY]], [[COPY1]]
; GFX9: $vgpr0 = COPY [[SMAX]](s32)
%0:_(s32) = COPY $vgpr0
%1:_(s32) = COPY $vgpr1
%2:_(s32) = G_SMAX %0, %1
$vgpr0 = COPY %2
...
2020-02-25 07:21:00 +08:00
---
name: test_smax_s64
body: |
bb.0:
liveins: $vgpr0_vgpr1, $vgpr2_vgpr3
; SI-LABEL: name: test_smax_s64
; SI: [[COPY:%[0-9]+]]:_(s64) = COPY $vgpr0_vgpr1
; SI: [[COPY1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s64) = COPY $vgpr2_vgpr3
AMDGPU/GlobalISel: Legalize s64 min/max by lowering
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, rovka, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75108
2020-02-25 18:31:37 +08:00
; SI: [[ICMP:%[0-9]+]]:_(s1) = G_ICMP intpred(sgt), [[COPY]](s64), [[COPY1]]
; SI: [[SELECT:%[0-9]+]]:_(s64) = G_SELECT [[ICMP]](s1), [[COPY]], [[COPY1]]
; SI: $vgpr0_vgpr1 = COPY [[SELECT]](s64)
2020-02-25 07:21:00 +08:00
; VI-LABEL: name: test_smax_s64
; VI: [[COPY:%[0-9]+]]:_(s64) = COPY $vgpr0_vgpr1
; VI: [[COPY1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s64) = COPY $vgpr2_vgpr3
AMDGPU/GlobalISel: Legalize s64 min/max by lowering
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, rovka, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75108
2020-02-25 18:31:37 +08:00
; VI: [[ICMP:%[0-9]+]]:_(s1) = G_ICMP intpred(sgt), [[COPY]](s64), [[COPY1]]
; VI: [[SELECT:%[0-9]+]]:_(s64) = G_SELECT [[ICMP]](s1), [[COPY]], [[COPY1]]
; VI: $vgpr0_vgpr1 = COPY [[SELECT]](s64)
2020-02-25 07:21:00 +08:00
; GFX9-LABEL: name: test_smax_s64
; GFX9: [[COPY:%[0-9]+]]:_(s64) = COPY $vgpr0_vgpr1
; GFX9: [[COPY1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s64) = COPY $vgpr2_vgpr3
AMDGPU/GlobalISel: Legalize s64 min/max by lowering
Reviewers: arsenm, rampitec
Subscribers: kzhuravl, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, rovka, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye, hiraditya, kerbowa, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75108
2020-02-25 18:31:37 +08:00
; GFX9: [[ICMP:%[0-9]+]]:_(s1) = G_ICMP intpred(sgt), [[COPY]](s64), [[COPY1]]
; GFX9: [[SELECT:%[0-9]+]]:_(s64) = G_SELECT [[ICMP]](s1), [[COPY]], [[COPY1]]
; GFX9: $vgpr0_vgpr1 = COPY [[SELECT]](s64)
2020-02-25 07:21:00 +08:00
%0:_(s64) = COPY $vgpr0_vgpr1
%1:_(s64) = COPY $vgpr2_vgpr3
%2:_(s64) = G_SMAX %0, %1
$vgpr0_vgpr1 = COPY %2
...
2019-05-24 01:58:48 +08:00
---
name: test_smax_s16
body: |
bb.0:
liveins: $vgpr0, $vgpr1
; SI-LABEL: name: test_smax_s16
; SI: [[COPY:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY $vgpr0
; SI: [[COPY1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY $vgpr1
; SI: [[COPY2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[COPY]](s32)
2020-02-05 05:06:34 +08:00
; SI: [[SEXT_INREG:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SEXT_INREG [[COPY2]], 16
2019-05-24 01:58:48 +08:00
; SI: [[COPY3:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[COPY1]](s32)
2020-02-05 05:06:34 +08:00
; SI: [[SEXT_INREG1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SEXT_INREG [[COPY3]], 16
; SI: [[SMAX:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SMAX [[SEXT_INREG]], [[SEXT_INREG1]]
2019-05-24 01:58:48 +08:00
; SI: [[COPY4:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[SMAX]](s32)
; SI: $vgpr0 = COPY [[COPY4]](s32)
; VI-LABEL: name: test_smax_s16
; VI: [[COPY:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY $vgpr0
; VI: [[COPY1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY $vgpr1
; VI: [[TRUNC:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_TRUNC [[COPY]](s32)
; VI: [[TRUNC1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_TRUNC [[COPY1]](s32)
; VI: [[SMAX:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_SMAX [[TRUNC]], [[TRUNC1]]
; VI: [[ANYEXT:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_ANYEXT [[SMAX]](s16)
; VI: $vgpr0 = COPY [[ANYEXT]](s32)
; GFX9-LABEL: name: test_smax_s16
; GFX9: [[COPY:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY $vgpr0
; GFX9: [[COPY1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY $vgpr1
; GFX9: [[TRUNC:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_TRUNC [[COPY]](s32)
; GFX9: [[TRUNC1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_TRUNC [[COPY1]](s32)
; GFX9: [[SMAX:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_SMAX [[TRUNC]], [[TRUNC1]]
; GFX9: [[ANYEXT:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_ANYEXT [[SMAX]](s16)
; GFX9: $vgpr0 = COPY [[ANYEXT]](s32)
%0:_(s32) = COPY $vgpr0
%1:_(s32) = COPY $vgpr1
%2:_(s16) = G_TRUNC %0
%3:_(s16) = G_TRUNC %1
%4:_(s16) = G_SMAX %2, %3
%5:_(s32) = G_ANYEXT %4
$vgpr0 = COPY %5
...
---
name: test_smax_s8
body: |
bb.0:
liveins: $vgpr0, $vgpr1
; SI-LABEL: name: test_smax_s8
; SI: [[COPY:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY $vgpr0
; SI: [[COPY1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY $vgpr1
; SI: [[COPY2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[COPY]](s32)
2020-02-05 05:06:34 +08:00
; SI: [[SEXT_INREG:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SEXT_INREG [[COPY2]], 8
2019-05-24 01:58:48 +08:00
; SI: [[COPY3:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[COPY1]](s32)
2020-02-05 05:06:34 +08:00
; SI: [[SEXT_INREG1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SEXT_INREG [[COPY3]], 8
; SI: [[SMAX:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SMAX [[SEXT_INREG]], [[SEXT_INREG1]]
2019-05-24 01:58:48 +08:00
; SI: [[COPY4:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[SMAX]](s32)
; SI: $vgpr0 = COPY [[COPY4]](s32)
; VI-LABEL: name: test_smax_s8
; VI: [[COPY:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY $vgpr0
; VI: [[COPY1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY $vgpr1
2019-08-22 00:59:10 +08:00
; VI: [[TRUNC:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_TRUNC [[COPY]](s32)
2019-09-05 00:19:45 +08:00
; VI: [[C:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_CONSTANT i16 8
; VI: [[SHL:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_SHL [[TRUNC]], [[C]](s16)
; VI: [[ASHR:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_ASHR [[SHL]], [[C]](s16)
; VI: [[TRUNC1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_TRUNC [[COPY1]](s32)
; VI: [[SHL1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_SHL [[TRUNC1]], [[C]](s16)
; VI: [[ASHR1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_ASHR [[SHL1]], [[C]](s16)
2019-05-24 01:58:48 +08:00
; VI: [[SMAX:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_SMAX [[ASHR]], [[ASHR1]]
; VI: [[ANYEXT:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_ANYEXT [[SMAX]](s16)
; VI: $vgpr0 = COPY [[ANYEXT]](s32)
; GFX9-LABEL: name: test_smax_s8
; GFX9: [[COPY:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY $vgpr0
; GFX9: [[COPY1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY $vgpr1
2020-02-05 05:06:34 +08:00
; GFX9: [[COPY2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[COPY]](s32)
; GFX9: [[SEXT_INREG:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SEXT_INREG [[COPY2]], 8
; GFX9: [[TRUNC:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_TRUNC [[SEXT_INREG]](s32)
; GFX9: [[COPY3:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[COPY1]](s32)
; GFX9: [[SEXT_INREG1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SEXT_INREG [[COPY3]], 8
; GFX9: [[TRUNC1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_TRUNC [[SEXT_INREG1]](s32)
; GFX9: [[SMAX:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_SMAX [[TRUNC]], [[TRUNC1]]
2019-05-24 01:58:48 +08:00
; GFX9: [[ANYEXT:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_ANYEXT [[SMAX]](s16)
; GFX9: $vgpr0 = COPY [[ANYEXT]](s32)
%0:_(s32) = COPY $vgpr0
%1:_(s32) = COPY $vgpr1
%2:_(s8) = G_TRUNC %0
%3:_(s8) = G_TRUNC %1
%4:_(s8) = G_SMAX %2, %3
%5:_(s32) = G_ANYEXT %4
$vgpr0 = COPY %5
...
---
name: test_smax_s17
body: |
bb.0:
liveins: $vgpr0, $vgpr1
; SI-LABEL: name: test_smax_s17
; SI: [[COPY:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY $vgpr0
; SI: [[COPY1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY $vgpr1
; SI: [[COPY2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[COPY]](s32)
2020-02-05 05:06:34 +08:00
; SI: [[SEXT_INREG:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SEXT_INREG [[COPY2]], 17
2019-05-24 01:58:48 +08:00
; SI: [[COPY3:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[COPY1]](s32)
2020-02-05 05:06:34 +08:00
; SI: [[SEXT_INREG1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SEXT_INREG [[COPY3]], 17
; SI: [[SMAX:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SMAX [[SEXT_INREG]], [[SEXT_INREG1]]
2019-05-24 01:58:48 +08:00
; SI: [[COPY4:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[SMAX]](s32)
; SI: $vgpr0 = COPY [[COPY4]](s32)
; VI-LABEL: name: test_smax_s17
; VI: [[COPY:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY $vgpr0
; VI: [[COPY1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY $vgpr1
; VI: [[COPY2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[COPY]](s32)
2020-02-05 05:06:34 +08:00
; VI: [[SEXT_INREG:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SEXT_INREG [[COPY2]], 17
2019-05-24 01:58:48 +08:00
; VI: [[COPY3:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[COPY1]](s32)
2020-02-05 05:06:34 +08:00
; VI: [[SEXT_INREG1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SEXT_INREG [[COPY3]], 17
; VI: [[SMAX:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SMAX [[SEXT_INREG]], [[SEXT_INREG1]]
2019-05-24 01:58:48 +08:00
; VI: [[COPY4:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[SMAX]](s32)
; VI: $vgpr0 = COPY [[COPY4]](s32)
; GFX9-LABEL: name: test_smax_s17
; GFX9: [[COPY:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY $vgpr0
; GFX9: [[COPY1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY $vgpr1
; GFX9: [[COPY2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[COPY]](s32)
2020-02-05 05:06:34 +08:00
; GFX9: [[SEXT_INREG:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SEXT_INREG [[COPY2]], 17
2019-05-24 01:58:48 +08:00
; GFX9: [[COPY3:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[COPY1]](s32)
2020-02-05 05:06:34 +08:00
; GFX9: [[SEXT_INREG1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SEXT_INREG [[COPY3]], 17
; GFX9: [[SMAX:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SMAX [[SEXT_INREG]], [[SEXT_INREG1]]
2019-05-24 01:58:48 +08:00
; GFX9: [[COPY4:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[SMAX]](s32)
; GFX9: $vgpr0 = COPY [[COPY4]](s32)
%0:_(s32) = COPY $vgpr0
%1:_(s32) = COPY $vgpr1
%2:_(s17) = G_TRUNC %0
%3:_(s17) = G_TRUNC %1
%4:_(s17) = G_SMAX %2, %3
%5:_(s32) = G_ANYEXT %4
$vgpr0 = COPY %5
...
---
name: test_smax_v2s32
body: |
bb.0:
liveins: $vgpr0_vgpr1, $vgpr2_vgpr3
; SI-LABEL: name: test_smax_v2s32
; SI: [[COPY:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s32>) = COPY $vgpr0_vgpr1
; SI: [[COPY1:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s32>) = COPY $vgpr2_vgpr3
; SI: [[UV:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32), [[UV1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_UNMERGE_VALUES [[COPY]](<2 x s32>)
; SI: [[UV2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32), [[UV3:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_UNMERGE_VALUES [[COPY1]](<2 x s32>)
; SI: [[SMAX:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SMAX [[UV]], [[UV2]]
; SI: [[SMAX1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SMAX [[UV1]], [[UV3]]
; SI: [[BUILD_VECTOR:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s32>) = G_BUILD_VECTOR [[SMAX]](s32), [[SMAX1]](s32)
; SI: $vgpr0_vgpr1 = COPY [[BUILD_VECTOR]](<2 x s32>)
; VI-LABEL: name: test_smax_v2s32
; VI: [[COPY:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s32>) = COPY $vgpr0_vgpr1
; VI: [[COPY1:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s32>) = COPY $vgpr2_vgpr3
; VI: [[UV:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32), [[UV1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_UNMERGE_VALUES [[COPY]](<2 x s32>)
; VI: [[UV2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32), [[UV3:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_UNMERGE_VALUES [[COPY1]](<2 x s32>)
; VI: [[SMAX:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SMAX [[UV]], [[UV2]]
; VI: [[SMAX1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SMAX [[UV1]], [[UV3]]
; VI: [[BUILD_VECTOR:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s32>) = G_BUILD_VECTOR [[SMAX]](s32), [[SMAX1]](s32)
; VI: $vgpr0_vgpr1 = COPY [[BUILD_VECTOR]](<2 x s32>)
; GFX9-LABEL: name: test_smax_v2s32
; GFX9: [[COPY:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s32>) = COPY $vgpr0_vgpr1
; GFX9: [[COPY1:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s32>) = COPY $vgpr2_vgpr3
; GFX9: [[UV:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32), [[UV1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_UNMERGE_VALUES [[COPY]](<2 x s32>)
; GFX9: [[UV2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32), [[UV3:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_UNMERGE_VALUES [[COPY1]](<2 x s32>)
; GFX9: [[SMAX:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SMAX [[UV]], [[UV2]]
; GFX9: [[SMAX1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SMAX [[UV1]], [[UV3]]
; GFX9: [[BUILD_VECTOR:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s32>) = G_BUILD_VECTOR [[SMAX]](s32), [[SMAX1]](s32)
; GFX9: $vgpr0_vgpr1 = COPY [[BUILD_VECTOR]](<2 x s32>)
%0:_(<2 x s32>) = COPY $vgpr0_vgpr1
%1:_(<2 x s32>) = COPY $vgpr2_vgpr3
%2:_(<2 x s32>) = G_SMAX %0, %1
$vgpr0_vgpr1 = COPY %2
...
---
name: test_smax_v3s32
body: |
bb.0:
liveins: $vgpr0_vgpr1_vgpr2, $vgpr3_vgpr4_vgpr5
; SI-LABEL: name: test_smax_v3s32
; SI: [[COPY:%[0-9]+]]:_(<3 x s32>) = COPY $vgpr0_vgpr1_vgpr2
; SI: [[COPY1:%[0-9]+]]:_(<3 x s32>) = COPY $vgpr3_vgpr4_vgpr5
; SI: [[UV:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32), [[UV1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32), [[UV2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_UNMERGE_VALUES [[COPY]](<3 x s32>)
; SI: [[UV3:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32), [[UV4:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32), [[UV5:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_UNMERGE_VALUES [[COPY1]](<3 x s32>)
; SI: [[SMAX:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SMAX [[UV]], [[UV3]]
; SI: [[SMAX1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SMAX [[UV1]], [[UV4]]
; SI: [[SMAX2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SMAX [[UV2]], [[UV5]]
; SI: [[BUILD_VECTOR:%[0-9]+]]:_(<3 x s32>) = G_BUILD_VECTOR [[SMAX]](s32), [[SMAX1]](s32), [[SMAX2]](s32)
; SI: $vgpr0_vgpr1_vgpr2 = COPY [[BUILD_VECTOR]](<3 x s32>)
; VI-LABEL: name: test_smax_v3s32
; VI: [[COPY:%[0-9]+]]:_(<3 x s32>) = COPY $vgpr0_vgpr1_vgpr2
; VI: [[COPY1:%[0-9]+]]:_(<3 x s32>) = COPY $vgpr3_vgpr4_vgpr5
; VI: [[UV:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32), [[UV1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32), [[UV2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_UNMERGE_VALUES [[COPY]](<3 x s32>)
; VI: [[UV3:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32), [[UV4:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32), [[UV5:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_UNMERGE_VALUES [[COPY1]](<3 x s32>)
; VI: [[SMAX:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SMAX [[UV]], [[UV3]]
; VI: [[SMAX1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SMAX [[UV1]], [[UV4]]
; VI: [[SMAX2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SMAX [[UV2]], [[UV5]]
; VI: [[BUILD_VECTOR:%[0-9]+]]:_(<3 x s32>) = G_BUILD_VECTOR [[SMAX]](s32), [[SMAX1]](s32), [[SMAX2]](s32)
; VI: $vgpr0_vgpr1_vgpr2 = COPY [[BUILD_VECTOR]](<3 x s32>)
; GFX9-LABEL: name: test_smax_v3s32
; GFX9: [[COPY:%[0-9]+]]:_(<3 x s32>) = COPY $vgpr0_vgpr1_vgpr2
; GFX9: [[COPY1:%[0-9]+]]:_(<3 x s32>) = COPY $vgpr3_vgpr4_vgpr5
; GFX9: [[UV:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32), [[UV1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32), [[UV2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_UNMERGE_VALUES [[COPY]](<3 x s32>)
; GFX9: [[UV3:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32), [[UV4:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32), [[UV5:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_UNMERGE_VALUES [[COPY1]](<3 x s32>)
; GFX9: [[SMAX:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SMAX [[UV]], [[UV3]]
; GFX9: [[SMAX1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SMAX [[UV1]], [[UV4]]
; GFX9: [[SMAX2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SMAX [[UV2]], [[UV5]]
; GFX9: [[BUILD_VECTOR:%[0-9]+]]:_(<3 x s32>) = G_BUILD_VECTOR [[SMAX]](s32), [[SMAX1]](s32), [[SMAX2]](s32)
; GFX9: $vgpr0_vgpr1_vgpr2 = COPY [[BUILD_VECTOR]](<3 x s32>)
%0:_(<3 x s32>) = COPY $vgpr0_vgpr1_vgpr2
%1:_(<3 x s32>) = COPY $vgpr3_vgpr4_vgpr5
%2:_(<3 x s32>) = G_SMAX %0, %1
$vgpr0_vgpr1_vgpr2 = COPY %2
...
---
name: test_smax_v2s16
body: |
bb.0:
liveins: $vgpr0, $vgpr1
; SI-LABEL: name: test_smax_v2s16
; SI: [[COPY:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>) = COPY $vgpr0
; SI: [[COPY1:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>) = COPY $vgpr1
2019-08-02 03:10:05 +08:00
; SI: [[BITCAST:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_BITCAST [[COPY]](<2 x s16>)
; SI: [[C:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_CONSTANT i32 16
; SI: [[LSHR:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_LSHR [[BITCAST]], [[C]](s32)
; SI: [[BITCAST1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_BITCAST [[COPY1]](<2 x s16>)
; SI: [[LSHR1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_LSHR [[BITCAST1]], [[C]](s32)
; SI: [[COPY2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[BITCAST]](s32)
2020-02-05 05:06:34 +08:00
; SI: [[SEXT_INREG:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SEXT_INREG [[COPY2]], 16
2019-08-02 03:10:05 +08:00
; SI: [[COPY3:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[BITCAST1]](s32)
2020-02-05 05:06:34 +08:00
; SI: [[SEXT_INREG1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SEXT_INREG [[COPY3]], 16
; SI: [[SMAX:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SMAX [[SEXT_INREG]], [[SEXT_INREG1]]
2019-08-02 03:10:05 +08:00
; SI: [[COPY4:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[LSHR]](s32)
2020-02-05 05:06:34 +08:00
; SI: [[SEXT_INREG2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SEXT_INREG [[COPY4]], 16
2019-08-02 03:10:05 +08:00
; SI: [[COPY5:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[LSHR1]](s32)
2020-02-05 05:06:34 +08:00
; SI: [[SEXT_INREG3:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SEXT_INREG [[COPY5]], 16
; SI: [[SMAX1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SMAX [[SEXT_INREG2]], [[SEXT_INREG3]]
2020-01-05 04:35:26 +08:00
; SI: [[C1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_CONSTANT i32 65535
; SI: [[COPY6:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[SMAX]](s32)
; SI: [[AND:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_AND [[COPY6]], [[C1]]
; SI: [[COPY7:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[SMAX1]](s32)
; SI: [[AND1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_AND [[COPY7]], [[C1]]
; SI: [[SHL:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SHL [[AND1]], [[C]](s32)
; SI: [[OR:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_OR [[AND]], [[SHL]]
; SI: [[BITCAST2:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>) = G_BITCAST [[OR]](s32)
; SI: $vgpr0 = COPY [[BITCAST2]](<2 x s16>)
2019-05-24 01:58:48 +08:00
; VI-LABEL: name: test_smax_v2s16
; VI: [[COPY:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>) = COPY $vgpr0
; VI: [[COPY1:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>) = COPY $vgpr1
2019-08-02 03:10:05 +08:00
; VI: [[BITCAST:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_BITCAST [[COPY]](<2 x s16>)
; VI: [[TRUNC:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_TRUNC [[BITCAST]](s32)
; VI: [[C:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_CONSTANT i32 16
; VI: [[LSHR:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_LSHR [[BITCAST]], [[C]](s32)
; VI: [[TRUNC1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_TRUNC [[LSHR]](s32)
; VI: [[BITCAST1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_BITCAST [[COPY1]](<2 x s16>)
; VI: [[TRUNC2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_TRUNC [[BITCAST1]](s32)
; VI: [[LSHR1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_LSHR [[BITCAST1]], [[C]](s32)
; VI: [[TRUNC3:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_TRUNC [[LSHR1]](s32)
; VI: [[SMAX:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_SMAX [[TRUNC]], [[TRUNC2]]
; VI: [[SMAX1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_SMAX [[TRUNC1]], [[TRUNC3]]
2020-01-05 04:35:26 +08:00
; VI: [[ZEXT:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_ZEXT [[SMAX]](s16)
; VI: [[ZEXT1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_ZEXT [[SMAX1]](s16)
; VI: [[SHL:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SHL [[ZEXT1]], [[C]](s32)
; VI: [[OR:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_OR [[ZEXT]], [[SHL]]
; VI: [[BITCAST2:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>) = G_BITCAST [[OR]](s32)
; VI: $vgpr0 = COPY [[BITCAST2]](<2 x s16>)
2019-05-24 01:58:48 +08:00
; GFX9-LABEL: name: test_smax_v2s16
; GFX9: [[COPY:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>) = COPY $vgpr0
; GFX9: [[COPY1:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>) = COPY $vgpr1
; GFX9: [[SMAX:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>) = G_SMAX [[COPY]], [[COPY1]]
; GFX9: $vgpr0 = COPY [[SMAX]](<2 x s16>)
%0:_(<2 x s16>) = COPY $vgpr0
%1:_(<2 x s16>) = COPY $vgpr1
%2:_(<2 x s16>) = G_SMAX %0, %1
$vgpr0 = COPY %2
...
---
name: test_smax_v3s16
body: |
bb.0:
liveins: $vgpr0, $vgpr1
; SI-LABEL: name: test_smax_v3s16
; SI: [[DEF:%[0-9]+]]:_(<4 x s16>) = G_IMPLICIT_DEF
; SI: [[DEF1:%[0-9]+]]:_(<4 x s16>) = G_IMPLICIT_DEF
2020-02-03 06:42:02 +08:00
; SI: [[DEF2:%[0-9]+]]:_(<4 x s16>) = G_IMPLICIT_DEF
2020-08-20 20:55:08 +08:00
; SI: [[UV:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>), [[UV1:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>) = G_UNMERGE_VALUES [[DEF]](<4 x s16>)
; SI: [[BITCAST:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_BITCAST [[UV]](<2 x s16>)
[GlobalISel] Legalizer: Retry combining illegal artifacts as long as there new artifacts
Summary:
Currently, Legalizer aborts if it’s unable to legalize artifacts. However, it’s
possible to combine them after processing the rest of the instruction because
the legalization is likely to generate more artifacts that allow ArtifactCombiner
to combine away them.
Instead, move illegal artifacts to another list called RetryList and wait until all of the
instruction in InstList are legalized. After that, check if there is any new artifacts and
try to combine them again if that’s the case. If not, abort. The idea is similar to D59339,
but the approach is a bit different.
This patch fixes the issue described above, but the legalizer still may be unable to handle
some cases depending on when to legalize artifacts. So, in the long run, we probably need
a different legalization strategy that handles this dependency in a better way.
Reviewers: dsanders, aditya_nandakumar, qcolombet, arsenm, aemerson, paquette
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, rovka, javed.absar, hiraditya, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65894
llvm-svn: 369805
2019-08-24 04:30:35 +08:00
; SI: [[C:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_CONSTANT i32 16
; SI: [[LSHR:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_LSHR [[BITCAST]], [[C]](s32)
2020-08-20 20:55:08 +08:00
; SI: [[BITCAST1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_BITCAST [[UV1]](<2 x s16>)
[GlobalISel] Legalizer: Retry combining illegal artifacts as long as there new artifacts
Summary:
Currently, Legalizer aborts if it’s unable to legalize artifacts. However, it’s
possible to combine them after processing the rest of the instruction because
the legalization is likely to generate more artifacts that allow ArtifactCombiner
to combine away them.
Instead, move illegal artifacts to another list called RetryList and wait until all of the
instruction in InstList are legalized. After that, check if there is any new artifacts and
try to combine them again if that’s the case. If not, abort. The idea is similar to D59339,
but the approach is a bit different.
This patch fixes the issue described above, but the legalizer still may be unable to handle
some cases depending on when to legalize artifacts. So, in the long run, we probably need
a different legalization strategy that handles this dependency in a better way.
Reviewers: dsanders, aditya_nandakumar, qcolombet, arsenm, aemerson, paquette
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, rovka, javed.absar, hiraditya, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65894
llvm-svn: 369805
2019-08-24 04:30:35 +08:00
; SI: [[LSHR1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_LSHR [[BITCAST1]], [[C]](s32)
2020-08-20 20:55:08 +08:00
; SI: [[UV2:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>), [[UV3:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>) = G_UNMERGE_VALUES [[DEF2]](<4 x s16>)
; SI: [[BITCAST2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_BITCAST [[UV2]](<2 x s16>)
[GlobalISel] Legalizer: Retry combining illegal artifacts as long as there new artifacts
Summary:
Currently, Legalizer aborts if it’s unable to legalize artifacts. However, it’s
possible to combine them after processing the rest of the instruction because
the legalization is likely to generate more artifacts that allow ArtifactCombiner
to combine away them.
Instead, move illegal artifacts to another list called RetryList and wait until all of the
instruction in InstList are legalized. After that, check if there is any new artifacts and
try to combine them again if that’s the case. If not, abort. The idea is similar to D59339,
but the approach is a bit different.
This patch fixes the issue described above, but the legalizer still may be unable to handle
some cases depending on when to legalize artifacts. So, in the long run, we probably need
a different legalization strategy that handles this dependency in a better way.
Reviewers: dsanders, aditya_nandakumar, qcolombet, arsenm, aemerson, paquette
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, rovka, javed.absar, hiraditya, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65894
llvm-svn: 369805
2019-08-24 04:30:35 +08:00
; SI: [[LSHR2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_LSHR [[BITCAST2]], [[C]](s32)
2020-08-20 20:55:08 +08:00
; SI: [[BITCAST3:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_BITCAST [[UV3]](<2 x s16>)
[GlobalISel] Legalizer: Retry combining illegal artifacts as long as there new artifacts
Summary:
Currently, Legalizer aborts if it’s unable to legalize artifacts. However, it’s
possible to combine them after processing the rest of the instruction because
the legalization is likely to generate more artifacts that allow ArtifactCombiner
to combine away them.
Instead, move illegal artifacts to another list called RetryList and wait until all of the
instruction in InstList are legalized. After that, check if there is any new artifacts and
try to combine them again if that’s the case. If not, abort. The idea is similar to D59339,
but the approach is a bit different.
This patch fixes the issue described above, but the legalizer still may be unable to handle
some cases depending on when to legalize artifacts. So, in the long run, we probably need
a different legalization strategy that handles this dependency in a better way.
Reviewers: dsanders, aditya_nandakumar, qcolombet, arsenm, aemerson, paquette
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, rovka, javed.absar, hiraditya, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65894
llvm-svn: 369805
2019-08-24 04:30:35 +08:00
; SI: [[LSHR3:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_LSHR [[BITCAST3]], [[C]](s32)
; SI: [[COPY:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[BITCAST]](s32)
2020-02-05 05:06:34 +08:00
; SI: [[SEXT_INREG:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SEXT_INREG [[COPY]], 16
[GlobalISel] Legalizer: Retry combining illegal artifacts as long as there new artifacts
Summary:
Currently, Legalizer aborts if it’s unable to legalize artifacts. However, it’s
possible to combine them after processing the rest of the instruction because
the legalization is likely to generate more artifacts that allow ArtifactCombiner
to combine away them.
Instead, move illegal artifacts to another list called RetryList and wait until all of the
instruction in InstList are legalized. After that, check if there is any new artifacts and
try to combine them again if that’s the case. If not, abort. The idea is similar to D59339,
but the approach is a bit different.
This patch fixes the issue described above, but the legalizer still may be unable to handle
some cases depending on when to legalize artifacts. So, in the long run, we probably need
a different legalization strategy that handles this dependency in a better way.
Reviewers: dsanders, aditya_nandakumar, qcolombet, arsenm, aemerson, paquette
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, rovka, javed.absar, hiraditya, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65894
llvm-svn: 369805
2019-08-24 04:30:35 +08:00
; SI: [[COPY1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[BITCAST2]](s32)
2020-02-05 05:06:34 +08:00
; SI: [[SEXT_INREG1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SEXT_INREG [[COPY1]], 16
; SI: [[SMAX:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SMAX [[SEXT_INREG]], [[SEXT_INREG1]]
[GlobalISel] Legalizer: Retry combining illegal artifacts as long as there new artifacts
Summary:
Currently, Legalizer aborts if it’s unable to legalize artifacts. However, it’s
possible to combine them after processing the rest of the instruction because
the legalization is likely to generate more artifacts that allow ArtifactCombiner
to combine away them.
Instead, move illegal artifacts to another list called RetryList and wait until all of the
instruction in InstList are legalized. After that, check if there is any new artifacts and
try to combine them again if that’s the case. If not, abort. The idea is similar to D59339,
but the approach is a bit different.
This patch fixes the issue described above, but the legalizer still may be unable to handle
some cases depending on when to legalize artifacts. So, in the long run, we probably need
a different legalization strategy that handles this dependency in a better way.
Reviewers: dsanders, aditya_nandakumar, qcolombet, arsenm, aemerson, paquette
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, rovka, javed.absar, hiraditya, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65894
llvm-svn: 369805
2019-08-24 04:30:35 +08:00
; SI: [[COPY2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[LSHR]](s32)
2020-02-05 05:06:34 +08:00
; SI: [[SEXT_INREG2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SEXT_INREG [[COPY2]], 16
[GlobalISel] Legalizer: Retry combining illegal artifacts as long as there new artifacts
Summary:
Currently, Legalizer aborts if it’s unable to legalize artifacts. However, it’s
possible to combine them after processing the rest of the instruction because
the legalization is likely to generate more artifacts that allow ArtifactCombiner
to combine away them.
Instead, move illegal artifacts to another list called RetryList and wait until all of the
instruction in InstList are legalized. After that, check if there is any new artifacts and
try to combine them again if that’s the case. If not, abort. The idea is similar to D59339,
but the approach is a bit different.
This patch fixes the issue described above, but the legalizer still may be unable to handle
some cases depending on when to legalize artifacts. So, in the long run, we probably need
a different legalization strategy that handles this dependency in a better way.
Reviewers: dsanders, aditya_nandakumar, qcolombet, arsenm, aemerson, paquette
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, rovka, javed.absar, hiraditya, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65894
llvm-svn: 369805
2019-08-24 04:30:35 +08:00
; SI: [[COPY3:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[LSHR2]](s32)
2020-02-05 05:06:34 +08:00
; SI: [[SEXT_INREG3:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SEXT_INREG [[COPY3]], 16
; SI: [[SMAX1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SMAX [[SEXT_INREG2]], [[SEXT_INREG3]]
[GlobalISel] Legalizer: Retry combining illegal artifacts as long as there new artifacts
Summary:
Currently, Legalizer aborts if it’s unable to legalize artifacts. However, it’s
possible to combine them after processing the rest of the instruction because
the legalization is likely to generate more artifacts that allow ArtifactCombiner
to combine away them.
Instead, move illegal artifacts to another list called RetryList and wait until all of the
instruction in InstList are legalized. After that, check if there is any new artifacts and
try to combine them again if that’s the case. If not, abort. The idea is similar to D59339,
but the approach is a bit different.
This patch fixes the issue described above, but the legalizer still may be unable to handle
some cases depending on when to legalize artifacts. So, in the long run, we probably need
a different legalization strategy that handles this dependency in a better way.
Reviewers: dsanders, aditya_nandakumar, qcolombet, arsenm, aemerson, paquette
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, rovka, javed.absar, hiraditya, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65894
llvm-svn: 369805
2019-08-24 04:30:35 +08:00
; SI: [[COPY4:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[BITCAST1]](s32)
2020-02-05 05:06:34 +08:00
; SI: [[SEXT_INREG4:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SEXT_INREG [[COPY4]], 16
[GlobalISel] Legalizer: Retry combining illegal artifacts as long as there new artifacts
Summary:
Currently, Legalizer aborts if it’s unable to legalize artifacts. However, it’s
possible to combine them after processing the rest of the instruction because
the legalization is likely to generate more artifacts that allow ArtifactCombiner
to combine away them.
Instead, move illegal artifacts to another list called RetryList and wait until all of the
instruction in InstList are legalized. After that, check if there is any new artifacts and
try to combine them again if that’s the case. If not, abort. The idea is similar to D59339,
but the approach is a bit different.
This patch fixes the issue described above, but the legalizer still may be unable to handle
some cases depending on when to legalize artifacts. So, in the long run, we probably need
a different legalization strategy that handles this dependency in a better way.
Reviewers: dsanders, aditya_nandakumar, qcolombet, arsenm, aemerson, paquette
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, rovka, javed.absar, hiraditya, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65894
llvm-svn: 369805
2019-08-24 04:30:35 +08:00
; SI: [[COPY5:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[BITCAST3]](s32)
2020-02-05 05:06:34 +08:00
; SI: [[SEXT_INREG5:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SEXT_INREG [[COPY5]], 16
; SI: [[SMAX2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SMAX [[SEXT_INREG4]], [[SEXT_INREG5]]
2020-07-28 22:15:42 +08:00
; SI: [[DEF3:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_IMPLICIT_DEF
; SI: [[DEF4:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>) = G_IMPLICIT_DEF
2020-01-05 04:35:26 +08:00
; SI: [[COPY6:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[SMAX]](s32)
; SI: [[COPY7:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[SMAX1]](s32)
; SI: [[COPY8:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[SMAX2]](s32)
2020-07-28 22:15:42 +08:00
; SI: [[BUILD_VECTOR:%[0-9]+]]:_(<3 x s32>) = G_BUILD_VECTOR [[COPY6]](s32), [[COPY7]](s32), [[COPY8]](s32)
2020-08-23 05:24:47 +08:00
; SI: S_NOP 0, implicit [[BUILD_VECTOR]](<3 x s32>)
2019-05-24 01:58:48 +08:00
; VI-LABEL: name: test_smax_v3s16
; VI: [[DEF:%[0-9]+]]:_(<4 x s16>) = G_IMPLICIT_DEF
; VI: [[DEF1:%[0-9]+]]:_(<4 x s16>) = G_IMPLICIT_DEF
2020-02-03 06:42:02 +08:00
; VI: [[DEF2:%[0-9]+]]:_(<4 x s16>) = G_IMPLICIT_DEF
2020-08-20 20:55:08 +08:00
; VI: [[UV:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>), [[UV1:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>) = G_UNMERGE_VALUES [[DEF]](<4 x s16>)
; VI: [[BITCAST:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_BITCAST [[UV]](<2 x s16>)
[GlobalISel] Legalizer: Retry combining illegal artifacts as long as there new artifacts
Summary:
Currently, Legalizer aborts if it’s unable to legalize artifacts. However, it’s
possible to combine them after processing the rest of the instruction because
the legalization is likely to generate more artifacts that allow ArtifactCombiner
to combine away them.
Instead, move illegal artifacts to another list called RetryList and wait until all of the
instruction in InstList are legalized. After that, check if there is any new artifacts and
try to combine them again if that’s the case. If not, abort. The idea is similar to D59339,
but the approach is a bit different.
This patch fixes the issue described above, but the legalizer still may be unable to handle
some cases depending on when to legalize artifacts. So, in the long run, we probably need
a different legalization strategy that handles this dependency in a better way.
Reviewers: dsanders, aditya_nandakumar, qcolombet, arsenm, aemerson, paquette
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, rovka, javed.absar, hiraditya, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65894
llvm-svn: 369805
2019-08-24 04:30:35 +08:00
; VI: [[TRUNC:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_TRUNC [[BITCAST]](s32)
; VI: [[C:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_CONSTANT i32 16
; VI: [[LSHR:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_LSHR [[BITCAST]], [[C]](s32)
; VI: [[TRUNC1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_TRUNC [[LSHR]](s32)
2020-08-20 20:55:08 +08:00
; VI: [[BITCAST1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_BITCAST [[UV1]](<2 x s16>)
[GlobalISel] Legalizer: Retry combining illegal artifacts as long as there new artifacts
Summary:
Currently, Legalizer aborts if it’s unable to legalize artifacts. However, it’s
possible to combine them after processing the rest of the instruction because
the legalization is likely to generate more artifacts that allow ArtifactCombiner
to combine away them.
Instead, move illegal artifacts to another list called RetryList and wait until all of the
instruction in InstList are legalized. After that, check if there is any new artifacts and
try to combine them again if that’s the case. If not, abort. The idea is similar to D59339,
but the approach is a bit different.
This patch fixes the issue described above, but the legalizer still may be unable to handle
some cases depending on when to legalize artifacts. So, in the long run, we probably need
a different legalization strategy that handles this dependency in a better way.
Reviewers: dsanders, aditya_nandakumar, qcolombet, arsenm, aemerson, paquette
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, rovka, javed.absar, hiraditya, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65894
llvm-svn: 369805
2019-08-24 04:30:35 +08:00
; VI: [[TRUNC2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_TRUNC [[BITCAST1]](s32)
; VI: [[LSHR1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_LSHR [[BITCAST1]], [[C]](s32)
2020-08-20 20:55:08 +08:00
; VI: [[UV2:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>), [[UV3:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>) = G_UNMERGE_VALUES [[DEF2]](<4 x s16>)
; VI: [[BITCAST2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_BITCAST [[UV2]](<2 x s16>)
[GlobalISel] Legalizer: Retry combining illegal artifacts as long as there new artifacts
Summary:
Currently, Legalizer aborts if it’s unable to legalize artifacts. However, it’s
possible to combine them after processing the rest of the instruction because
the legalization is likely to generate more artifacts that allow ArtifactCombiner
to combine away them.
Instead, move illegal artifacts to another list called RetryList and wait until all of the
instruction in InstList are legalized. After that, check if there is any new artifacts and
try to combine them again if that’s the case. If not, abort. The idea is similar to D59339,
but the approach is a bit different.
This patch fixes the issue described above, but the legalizer still may be unable to handle
some cases depending on when to legalize artifacts. So, in the long run, we probably need
a different legalization strategy that handles this dependency in a better way.
Reviewers: dsanders, aditya_nandakumar, qcolombet, arsenm, aemerson, paquette
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, rovka, javed.absar, hiraditya, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65894
llvm-svn: 369805
2019-08-24 04:30:35 +08:00
; VI: [[TRUNC3:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_TRUNC [[BITCAST2]](s32)
; VI: [[LSHR2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_LSHR [[BITCAST2]], [[C]](s32)
; VI: [[TRUNC4:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_TRUNC [[LSHR2]](s32)
2020-08-20 20:55:08 +08:00
; VI: [[BITCAST3:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_BITCAST [[UV3]](<2 x s16>)
[GlobalISel] Legalizer: Retry combining illegal artifacts as long as there new artifacts
Summary:
Currently, Legalizer aborts if it’s unable to legalize artifacts. However, it’s
possible to combine them after processing the rest of the instruction because
the legalization is likely to generate more artifacts that allow ArtifactCombiner
to combine away them.
Instead, move illegal artifacts to another list called RetryList and wait until all of the
instruction in InstList are legalized. After that, check if there is any new artifacts and
try to combine them again if that’s the case. If not, abort. The idea is similar to D59339,
but the approach is a bit different.
This patch fixes the issue described above, but the legalizer still may be unable to handle
some cases depending on when to legalize artifacts. So, in the long run, we probably need
a different legalization strategy that handles this dependency in a better way.
Reviewers: dsanders, aditya_nandakumar, qcolombet, arsenm, aemerson, paquette
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, rovka, javed.absar, hiraditya, Petar.Avramovic, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65894
llvm-svn: 369805
2019-08-24 04:30:35 +08:00
; VI: [[TRUNC5:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_TRUNC [[BITCAST3]](s32)
; VI: [[LSHR3:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_LSHR [[BITCAST3]], [[C]](s32)
; VI: [[SMAX:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_SMAX [[TRUNC]], [[TRUNC3]]
; VI: [[SMAX1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_SMAX [[TRUNC1]], [[TRUNC4]]
; VI: [[SMAX2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_SMAX [[TRUNC2]], [[TRUNC5]]
2020-07-28 22:15:42 +08:00
; VI: [[DEF3:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_IMPLICIT_DEF
; VI: [[DEF4:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>) = G_IMPLICIT_DEF
; VI: [[ANYEXT:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_ANYEXT [[SMAX]](s16)
; VI: [[ANYEXT1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_ANYEXT [[SMAX1]](s16)
; VI: [[ANYEXT2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_ANYEXT [[SMAX2]](s16)
; VI: [[BUILD_VECTOR:%[0-9]+]]:_(<3 x s32>) = G_BUILD_VECTOR [[ANYEXT]](s32), [[ANYEXT1]](s32), [[ANYEXT2]](s32)
2020-08-23 05:24:47 +08:00
; VI: S_NOP 0, implicit [[BUILD_VECTOR]](<3 x s32>)
2019-05-24 01:58:48 +08:00
; GFX9-LABEL: name: test_smax_v3s16
; GFX9: [[DEF:%[0-9]+]]:_(<4 x s16>) = G_IMPLICIT_DEF
; GFX9: [[DEF1:%[0-9]+]]:_(<4 x s16>) = G_IMPLICIT_DEF
2020-02-03 06:42:02 +08:00
; GFX9: [[CONCAT_VECTORS:%[0-9]+]]:_(<12 x s16>) = G_CONCAT_VECTORS [[DEF]](<4 x s16>), [[DEF1]](<4 x s16>), [[DEF1]](<4 x s16>)
; GFX9: [[UV:%[0-9]+]]:_(<3 x s16>), [[UV1:%[0-9]+]]:_(<3 x s16>), [[UV2:%[0-9]+]]:_(<3 x s16>), [[UV3:%[0-9]+]]:_(<3 x s16>) = G_UNMERGE_VALUES [[CONCAT_VECTORS]](<12 x s16>)
2019-05-24 01:58:48 +08:00
; GFX9: [[DEF2:%[0-9]+]]:_(<4 x s16>) = G_IMPLICIT_DEF
2020-02-03 06:42:02 +08:00
; GFX9: [[CONCAT_VECTORS1:%[0-9]+]]:_(<12 x s16>) = G_CONCAT_VECTORS [[DEF2]](<4 x s16>), [[DEF1]](<4 x s16>), [[DEF1]](<4 x s16>)
; GFX9: [[UV4:%[0-9]+]]:_(<3 x s16>), [[UV5:%[0-9]+]]:_(<3 x s16>), [[UV6:%[0-9]+]]:_(<3 x s16>), [[UV7:%[0-9]+]]:_(<3 x s16>) = G_UNMERGE_VALUES [[CONCAT_VECTORS1]](<12 x s16>)
; GFX9: [[INSERT:%[0-9]+]]:_(<4 x s16>) = G_INSERT [[DEF1]], [[UV]](<3 x s16>), 0
; GFX9: [[INSERT1:%[0-9]+]]:_(<4 x s16>) = G_INSERT [[DEF1]], [[UV4]](<3 x s16>), 0
; GFX9: [[UV8:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>), [[UV9:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>) = G_UNMERGE_VALUES [[INSERT]](<4 x s16>)
; GFX9: [[UV10:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>), [[UV11:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>) = G_UNMERGE_VALUES [[INSERT1]](<4 x s16>)
; GFX9: [[SMAX:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>) = G_SMAX [[UV8]], [[UV10]]
; GFX9: [[SMAX1:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>) = G_SMAX [[UV9]], [[UV11]]
2020-08-20 20:55:08 +08:00
; GFX9: [[BITCAST:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_BITCAST [[SMAX]](<2 x s16>)
2020-08-23 05:24:47 +08:00
; GFX9: [[C:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_CONSTANT i32 16
; GFX9: [[LSHR:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_LSHR [[BITCAST]], [[C]](s32)
2020-08-20 20:55:08 +08:00
; GFX9: [[BITCAST1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_BITCAST [[SMAX1]](<2 x s16>)
2020-08-23 05:24:47 +08:00
; GFX9: [[LSHR1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_LSHR [[BITCAST1]], [[C]](s32)
; GFX9: [[COPY:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[BITCAST]](s32)
; GFX9: [[COPY1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[LSHR]](s32)
; GFX9: [[COPY2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[BITCAST1]](s32)
; GFX9: [[BUILD_VECTOR:%[0-9]+]]:_(<3 x s32>) = G_BUILD_VECTOR [[COPY]](s32), [[COPY1]](s32), [[COPY2]](s32)
; GFX9: S_NOP 0, implicit [[BUILD_VECTOR]](<3 x s32>)
2019-05-24 01:58:48 +08:00
%0:_(<3 x s16>) = G_IMPLICIT_DEF
%1:_(<3 x s16>) = G_IMPLICIT_DEF
%2:_(<3 x s16>) = G_SMAX %0, %1
2020-08-23 05:24:47 +08:00
%3:_(<3 x s32>) = G_ANYEXT %2
S_NOP 0, implicit %3
2019-05-24 01:58:48 +08:00
...
---
name: test_smax_v4s16
body: |
bb.0:
liveins: $vgpr0_vgpr1, $vgpr2_vgpr3
; SI-LABEL: name: test_smax_v4s16
; SI: [[COPY:%[0-9]+]]:_(<4 x s16>) = COPY $vgpr0_vgpr1
; SI: [[COPY1:%[0-9]+]]:_(<4 x s16>) = COPY $vgpr2_vgpr3
2019-08-14 00:26:28 +08:00
; SI: [[UV:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>), [[UV1:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>) = G_UNMERGE_VALUES [[COPY]](<4 x s16>)
; SI: [[BITCAST:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_BITCAST [[UV]](<2 x s16>)
; SI: [[C:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_CONSTANT i32 16
; SI: [[LSHR:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_LSHR [[BITCAST]], [[C]](s32)
; SI: [[BITCAST1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_BITCAST [[UV1]](<2 x s16>)
; SI: [[LSHR1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_LSHR [[BITCAST1]], [[C]](s32)
; SI: [[UV2:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>), [[UV3:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>) = G_UNMERGE_VALUES [[COPY1]](<4 x s16>)
; SI: [[BITCAST2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_BITCAST [[UV2]](<2 x s16>)
; SI: [[LSHR2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_LSHR [[BITCAST2]], [[C]](s32)
; SI: [[BITCAST3:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_BITCAST [[UV3]](<2 x s16>)
; SI: [[LSHR3:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_LSHR [[BITCAST3]], [[C]](s32)
; SI: [[COPY2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[BITCAST]](s32)
2020-02-05 05:06:34 +08:00
; SI: [[SEXT_INREG:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SEXT_INREG [[COPY2]], 16
2019-08-14 00:26:28 +08:00
; SI: [[COPY3:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[BITCAST2]](s32)
2020-02-05 05:06:34 +08:00
; SI: [[SEXT_INREG1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SEXT_INREG [[COPY3]], 16
; SI: [[SMAX:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SMAX [[SEXT_INREG]], [[SEXT_INREG1]]
2019-08-14 00:26:28 +08:00
; SI: [[COPY4:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[LSHR]](s32)
2020-02-05 05:06:34 +08:00
; SI: [[SEXT_INREG2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SEXT_INREG [[COPY4]], 16
2019-08-14 00:26:28 +08:00
; SI: [[COPY5:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[LSHR2]](s32)
2020-02-05 05:06:34 +08:00
; SI: [[SEXT_INREG3:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SEXT_INREG [[COPY5]], 16
; SI: [[SMAX1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SMAX [[SEXT_INREG2]], [[SEXT_INREG3]]
2019-08-14 00:26:28 +08:00
; SI: [[COPY6:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[BITCAST1]](s32)
2020-02-05 05:06:34 +08:00
; SI: [[SEXT_INREG4:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SEXT_INREG [[COPY6]], 16
2019-08-14 00:26:28 +08:00
; SI: [[COPY7:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[BITCAST3]](s32)
2020-02-05 05:06:34 +08:00
; SI: [[SEXT_INREG5:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SEXT_INREG [[COPY7]], 16
; SI: [[SMAX2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SMAX [[SEXT_INREG4]], [[SEXT_INREG5]]
2019-08-14 00:26:28 +08:00
; SI: [[COPY8:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[LSHR1]](s32)
2020-02-05 05:06:34 +08:00
; SI: [[SEXT_INREG6:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SEXT_INREG [[COPY8]], 16
2019-08-14 00:26:28 +08:00
; SI: [[COPY9:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[LSHR3]](s32)
2020-02-05 05:06:34 +08:00
; SI: [[SEXT_INREG7:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SEXT_INREG [[COPY9]], 16
; SI: [[SMAX3:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SMAX [[SEXT_INREG6]], [[SEXT_INREG7]]
2020-01-05 04:35:26 +08:00
; SI: [[C1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_CONSTANT i32 65535
; SI: [[COPY10:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[SMAX]](s32)
; SI: [[AND:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_AND [[COPY10]], [[C1]]
; SI: [[COPY11:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[SMAX1]](s32)
; SI: [[AND1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_AND [[COPY11]], [[C1]]
; SI: [[SHL:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SHL [[AND1]], [[C]](s32)
; SI: [[OR:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_OR [[AND]], [[SHL]]
; SI: [[BITCAST4:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>) = G_BITCAST [[OR]](s32)
; SI: [[COPY12:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[SMAX2]](s32)
; SI: [[AND2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_AND [[COPY12]], [[C1]]
; SI: [[COPY13:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = COPY [[SMAX3]](s32)
; SI: [[AND3:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_AND [[COPY13]], [[C1]]
; SI: [[SHL1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SHL [[AND3]], [[C]](s32)
; SI: [[OR1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_OR [[AND2]], [[SHL1]]
; SI: [[BITCAST5:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>) = G_BITCAST [[OR1]](s32)
; SI: [[CONCAT_VECTORS:%[0-9]+]]:_(<4 x s16>) = G_CONCAT_VECTORS [[BITCAST4]](<2 x s16>), [[BITCAST5]](<2 x s16>)
2019-10-10 06:44:43 +08:00
; SI: $vgpr0_vgpr1 = COPY [[CONCAT_VECTORS]](<4 x s16>)
2019-05-24 01:58:48 +08:00
; VI-LABEL: name: test_smax_v4s16
; VI: [[COPY:%[0-9]+]]:_(<4 x s16>) = COPY $vgpr0_vgpr1
; VI: [[COPY1:%[0-9]+]]:_(<4 x s16>) = COPY $vgpr2_vgpr3
2019-08-14 00:26:28 +08:00
; VI: [[UV:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>), [[UV1:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>) = G_UNMERGE_VALUES [[COPY]](<4 x s16>)
; VI: [[BITCAST:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_BITCAST [[UV]](<2 x s16>)
; VI: [[TRUNC:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_TRUNC [[BITCAST]](s32)
; VI: [[C:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_CONSTANT i32 16
; VI: [[LSHR:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_LSHR [[BITCAST]], [[C]](s32)
; VI: [[TRUNC1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_TRUNC [[LSHR]](s32)
; VI: [[BITCAST1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_BITCAST [[UV1]](<2 x s16>)
; VI: [[TRUNC2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_TRUNC [[BITCAST1]](s32)
; VI: [[LSHR1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_LSHR [[BITCAST1]], [[C]](s32)
; VI: [[TRUNC3:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_TRUNC [[LSHR1]](s32)
; VI: [[UV2:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>), [[UV3:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>) = G_UNMERGE_VALUES [[COPY1]](<4 x s16>)
; VI: [[BITCAST2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_BITCAST [[UV2]](<2 x s16>)
; VI: [[TRUNC4:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_TRUNC [[BITCAST2]](s32)
; VI: [[LSHR2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_LSHR [[BITCAST2]], [[C]](s32)
; VI: [[TRUNC5:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_TRUNC [[LSHR2]](s32)
; VI: [[BITCAST3:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_BITCAST [[UV3]](<2 x s16>)
; VI: [[TRUNC6:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_TRUNC [[BITCAST3]](s32)
; VI: [[LSHR3:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_LSHR [[BITCAST3]], [[C]](s32)
; VI: [[TRUNC7:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_TRUNC [[LSHR3]](s32)
; VI: [[SMAX:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_SMAX [[TRUNC]], [[TRUNC4]]
; VI: [[SMAX1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_SMAX [[TRUNC1]], [[TRUNC5]]
; VI: [[SMAX2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_SMAX [[TRUNC2]], [[TRUNC6]]
; VI: [[SMAX3:%[0-9]+]]:_(s16) = G_SMAX [[TRUNC3]], [[TRUNC7]]
2020-01-05 04:35:26 +08:00
; VI: [[ZEXT:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_ZEXT [[SMAX]](s16)
; VI: [[ZEXT1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_ZEXT [[SMAX1]](s16)
; VI: [[SHL:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SHL [[ZEXT1]], [[C]](s32)
; VI: [[OR:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_OR [[ZEXT]], [[SHL]]
; VI: [[BITCAST4:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>) = G_BITCAST [[OR]](s32)
; VI: [[ZEXT2:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_ZEXT [[SMAX2]](s16)
; VI: [[ZEXT3:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_ZEXT [[SMAX3]](s16)
; VI: [[SHL1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_SHL [[ZEXT3]], [[C]](s32)
; VI: [[OR1:%[0-9]+]]:_(s32) = G_OR [[ZEXT2]], [[SHL1]]
; VI: [[BITCAST5:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>) = G_BITCAST [[OR1]](s32)
; VI: [[CONCAT_VECTORS:%[0-9]+]]:_(<4 x s16>) = G_CONCAT_VECTORS [[BITCAST4]](<2 x s16>), [[BITCAST5]](<2 x s16>)
2019-10-10 06:44:43 +08:00
; VI: $vgpr0_vgpr1 = COPY [[CONCAT_VECTORS]](<4 x s16>)
2019-05-24 01:58:48 +08:00
; GFX9-LABEL: name: test_smax_v4s16
; GFX9: [[COPY:%[0-9]+]]:_(<4 x s16>) = COPY $vgpr0_vgpr1
; GFX9: [[COPY1:%[0-9]+]]:_(<4 x s16>) = COPY $vgpr2_vgpr3
; GFX9: [[UV:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>), [[UV1:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>) = G_UNMERGE_VALUES [[COPY]](<4 x s16>)
; GFX9: [[UV2:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>), [[UV3:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>) = G_UNMERGE_VALUES [[COPY1]](<4 x s16>)
; GFX9: [[SMAX:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>) = G_SMAX [[UV]], [[UV2]]
; GFX9: [[SMAX1:%[0-9]+]]:_(<2 x s16>) = G_SMAX [[UV1]], [[UV3]]
; GFX9: [[CONCAT_VECTORS:%[0-9]+]]:_(<4 x s16>) = G_CONCAT_VECTORS [[SMAX]](<2 x s16>), [[SMAX1]](<2 x s16>)
; GFX9: $vgpr0_vgpr1 = COPY [[CONCAT_VECTORS]](<4 x s16>)
%0:_(<4 x s16>) = COPY $vgpr0_vgpr1
%1:_(<4 x s16>) = COPY $vgpr2_vgpr3
%2:_(<4 x s16>) = G_SMAX %0, %1
$vgpr0_vgpr1 = COPY %2
...