llvm-project/clang/test/Lexer/numeric-literal-trash.c

/* RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
 * expected-no-diagnostics */
# define XRECORD(x, c_name) e##c (x, __LINE__)


int ec(int, int);


 void x() {

XRECORD (XRECORD (1, 1), 1);
    }
Update tests to use %clang_cc1 instead of 'clang-cc' or 'clang -cc1'. - This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable" which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set a default target). llvm-svn: 91446 2009-12-16 04:14:24 +08:00			`/* RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s`
Prior to adding the new "expected-no-diagnostics" directive to VerifyDiagnosticConsumer, make the necessary adjustment to 580 test-cases which will henceforth require this new directive. llvm-svn: 166280 2012-10-19 20:44:48 +08:00			`* expected-no-diagnostics */`
Fix for PR2750; don't check for an 'e' in the trash after the token. Note that this isn't really a complete fix; I think there are other potential overrun situations. I don't really know what the best systematic fix is, though. llvm-svn: 55622 2008-09-02 13:29:22 +08:00			`# define XRECORD(x, c_name) e##c (x, __LINE__)`



add a bunch of missing prototypes to tests llvm-svn: 93072 2010-01-10 04:43:19 +08:00			`int ec(int, int);`
Fix for PR2750; don't check for an 'e' in the trash after the token. Note that this isn't really a complete fix; I think there are other potential overrun situations. I don't really know what the best systematic fix is, though. llvm-svn: 55622 2008-09-02 13:29:22 +08:00

			`void x() {`

			`XRECORD (XRECORD (1, 1), 1);`
			`}`