llvm-project/llvm/lib/Transforms/IPO/MergeFunctions.cpp

1484 lines
53 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

//===- MergeFunctions.cpp - Merge identical functions ---------------------===//
//
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
//
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// This pass looks for equivalent functions that are mergable and folds them.
//
// Order relation is defined on set of functions. It was made through
// special function comparison procedure that returns
// 0 when functions are equal,
// -1 when Left function is less than right function, and
// 1 for opposite case. We need total-ordering, so we need to maintain
// four properties on the functions set:
// a <= a (reflexivity)
// if a <= b and b <= a then a = b (antisymmetry)
// if a <= b and b <= c then a <= c (transitivity).
// for all a and b: a <= b or b <= a (totality).
//
// Comparison iterates through each instruction in each basic block.
// Functions are kept on binary tree. For each new function F we perform
// lookup in binary tree.
// In practice it works the following way:
// -- We define Function* container class with custom "operator<" (FunctionPtr).
// -- "FunctionPtr" instances are stored in std::set collection, so every
// std::set::insert operation will give you result in log(N) time.
//
// When a match is found the functions are folded. If both functions are
// overridable, we move the functionality into a new internal function and
// leave two overridable thunks to it.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
//
// Future work:
//
// * virtual functions.
//
// Many functions have their address taken by the virtual function table for
// the object they belong to. However, as long as it's only used for a lookup
// and call, this is irrelevant, and we'd like to fold such functions.
//
// * be smarter about bitcasts.
//
// In order to fold functions, we will sometimes add either bitcast instructions
// or bitcast constant expressions. Unfortunately, this can confound further
// analysis since the two functions differ where one has a bitcast and the
// other doesn't. We should learn to look through bitcasts.
//
// * Compare complex types with pointer types inside.
// * Compare cross-reference cases.
// * Compare complex expressions.
//
// All the three issues above could be described as ability to prove that
// fA == fB == fC == fE == fF == fG in example below:
//
// void fA() {
// fB();
// }
// void fB() {
// fA();
// }
//
// void fE() {
// fF();
// }
// void fF() {
// fG();
// }
// void fG() {
// fE();
// }
//
// Simplest cross-reference case (fA <--> fB) was implemented in previous
// versions of MergeFunctions, though it presented only in two function pairs
// in test-suite (that counts >50k functions)
// Though possibility to detect complex cross-referencing (e.g.: A->B->C->D->A)
// could cover much more cases.
//
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
#include "llvm/Transforms/IPO.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/DenseSet.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/FoldingSet.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/STLExtras.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/SmallSet.h"
#include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h"
#include "llvm/IR/CallSite.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Constants.h"
#include "llvm/IR/DataLayout.h"
#include "llvm/IR/IRBuilder.h"
#include "llvm/IR/InlineAsm.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Instructions.h"
#include "llvm/IR/LLVMContext.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Module.h"
#include "llvm/IR/Operator.h"
#include "llvm/IR/ValueHandle.h"
#include "llvm/Pass.h"
#include "llvm/Support/CommandLine.h"
#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
#include "llvm/Support/ErrorHandling.h"
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
#include <vector>
using namespace llvm;
#define DEBUG_TYPE "mergefunc"
STATISTIC(NumFunctionsMerged, "Number of functions merged");
STATISTIC(NumThunksWritten, "Number of thunks generated");
STATISTIC(NumAliasesWritten, "Number of aliases generated");
STATISTIC(NumDoubleWeak, "Number of new functions created");
static cl::opt<unsigned> NumFunctionsForSanityCheck(
"mergefunc-sanity",
cl::desc("How many functions in module could be used for "
"MergeFunctions pass sanity check. "
"'0' disables this check. Works only with '-debug' key."),
cl::init(0), cl::Hidden);
namespace {
/// FunctionComparator - Compares two functions to determine whether or not
/// they will generate machine code with the same behaviour. DataLayout is
/// used if available. The comparator always fails conservatively (erring on the
/// side of claiming that two functions are different).
class FunctionComparator {
public:
FunctionComparator(const Function *F1, const Function *F2)
: FnL(F1), FnR(F2) {}
/// Test whether the two functions have equivalent behaviour.
int compare();
private:
/// Test whether two basic blocks have equivalent behaviour.
int compare(const BasicBlock *BBL, const BasicBlock *BBR);
/// Constants comparison.
/// Its analog to lexicographical comparison between hypothetical numbers
/// of next format:
/// <bitcastability-trait><raw-bit-contents>
///
/// 1. Bitcastability.
/// Check whether L's type could be losslessly bitcasted to R's type.
/// On this stage method, in case when lossless bitcast is not possible
/// method returns -1 or 1, thus also defining which type is greater in
/// context of bitcastability.
/// Stage 0: If types are equal in terms of cmpTypes, then we can go straight
/// to the contents comparison.
/// If types differ, remember types comparison result and check
/// whether we still can bitcast types.
/// Stage 1: Types that satisfies isFirstClassType conditions are always
/// greater then others.
/// Stage 2: Vector is greater then non-vector.
/// If both types are vectors, then vector with greater bitwidth is
/// greater.
/// If both types are vectors with the same bitwidth, then types
/// are bitcastable, and we can skip other stages, and go to contents
/// comparison.
/// Stage 3: Pointer types are greater than non-pointers. If both types are
/// pointers of the same address space - go to contents comparison.
/// Different address spaces: pointer with greater address space is
/// greater.
/// Stage 4: Types are neither vectors, nor pointers. And they differ.
/// We don't know how to bitcast them. So, we better don't do it,
/// and return types comparison result (so it determines the
/// relationship among constants we don't know how to bitcast).
///
/// Just for clearance, let's see how the set of constants could look
/// on single dimension axis:
///
/// [NFCT], [FCT, "others"], [FCT, pointers], [FCT, vectors]
/// Where: NFCT - Not a FirstClassType
/// FCT - FirstClassTyp:
///
/// 2. Compare raw contents.
/// It ignores types on this stage and only compares bits from L and R.
/// Returns 0, if L and R has equivalent contents.
/// -1 or 1 if values are different.
/// Pretty trivial:
/// 2.1. If contents are numbers, compare numbers.
/// Ints with greater bitwidth are greater. Ints with same bitwidths
/// compared by their contents.
/// 2.2. "And so on". Just to avoid discrepancies with comments
/// perhaps it would be better to read the implementation itself.
/// 3. And again about overall picture. Let's look back at how the ordered set
/// of constants will look like:
/// [NFCT], [FCT, "others"], [FCT, pointers], [FCT, vectors]
///
/// Now look, what could be inside [FCT, "others"], for example:
/// [FCT, "others"] =
/// [
/// [double 0.1], [double 1.23],
/// [i32 1], [i32 2],
/// { double 1.0 }, ; StructTyID, NumElements = 1
/// { i32 1 }, ; StructTyID, NumElements = 1
/// { double 1, i32 1 }, ; StructTyID, NumElements = 2
/// { i32 1, double 1 } ; StructTyID, NumElements = 2
/// ]
///
/// Let's explain the order. Float numbers will be less than integers, just
/// because of cmpType terms: FloatTyID < IntegerTyID.
/// Floats (with same fltSemantics) are sorted according to their value.
/// Then you can see integers, and they are, like a floats,
/// could be easy sorted among each others.
/// The structures. Structures are grouped at the tail, again because of their
/// TypeID: StructTyID > IntegerTyID > FloatTyID.
/// Structures with greater number of elements are greater. Structures with
/// greater elements going first are greater.
/// The same logic with vectors, arrays and other possible complex types.
///
/// Bitcastable constants.
/// Let's assume, that some constant, belongs to some group of
/// "so-called-equal" values with different types, and at the same time
/// belongs to another group of constants with equal types
/// and "really" equal values.
///
/// Now, prove that this is impossible:
///
/// If constant A with type TyA is bitcastable to B with type TyB, then:
/// 1. All constants with equal types to TyA, are bitcastable to B. Since
/// those should be vectors (if TyA is vector), pointers
/// (if TyA is pointer), or else (if TyA equal to TyB), those types should
/// be equal to TyB.
/// 2. All constants with non-equal, but bitcastable types to TyA, are
/// bitcastable to B.
/// Once again, just because we allow it to vectors and pointers only.
/// This statement could be expanded as below:
/// 2.1. All vectors with equal bitwidth to vector A, has equal bitwidth to
/// vector B, and thus bitcastable to B as well.
/// 2.2. All pointers of the same address space, no matter what they point to,
/// bitcastable. So if C is pointer, it could be bitcasted to A and to B.
/// So any constant equal or bitcastable to A is equal or bitcastable to B.
/// QED.
///
/// In another words, for pointers and vectors, we ignore top-level type and
/// look at their particular properties (bit-width for vectors, and
/// address space for pointers).
/// If these properties are equal - compare their contents.
int cmpConstants(const Constant *L, const Constant *R);
/// Assign or look up previously assigned numbers for the two values, and
/// return whether the numbers are equal. Numbers are assigned in the order
/// visited.
/// Comparison order:
/// Stage 0: Value that is function itself is always greater then others.
/// If left and right values are references to their functions, then
/// they are equal.
/// Stage 1: Constants are greater than non-constants.
/// If both left and right are constants, then the result of
/// cmpConstants is used as cmpValues result.
/// Stage 2: InlineAsm instances are greater than others. If both left and
/// right are InlineAsm instances, InlineAsm* pointers casted to
/// integers and compared as numbers.
/// Stage 3: For all other cases we compare order we meet these values in
/// their functions. If right value was met first during scanning,
/// then left value is greater.
/// In another words, we compare serial numbers, for more details
/// see comments for sn_mapL and sn_mapR.
int cmpValues(const Value *L, const Value *R);
/// Compare two Instructions for equivalence, similar to
/// Instruction::isSameOperationAs but with modifications to the type
/// comparison.
/// Stages are listed in "most significant stage first" order:
/// On each stage below, we do comparison between some left and right
/// operation parts. If parts are non-equal, we assign parts comparison
/// result to the operation comparison result and exit from method.
/// Otherwise we proceed to the next stage.
/// Stages:
/// 1. Operations opcodes. Compared as numbers.
/// 2. Number of operands.
/// 3. Operation types. Compared with cmpType method.
/// 4. Compare operation subclass optional data as stream of bytes:
/// just convert it to integers and call cmpNumbers.
/// 5. Compare in operation operand types with cmpType in
/// most significant operand first order.
/// 6. Last stage. Check operations for some specific attributes.
/// For example, for Load it would be:
/// 6.1.Load: volatile (as boolean flag)
/// 6.2.Load: alignment (as integer numbers)
/// 6.3.Load: synch-scope (as integer numbers)
/// 6.4.Load: range metadata (as integer numbers)
/// On this stage its better to see the code, since its not more than 10-15
/// strings for particular instruction, and could change sometimes.
int cmpOperations(const Instruction *L, const Instruction *R) const;
/// Compare two GEPs for equivalent pointer arithmetic.
/// Parts to be compared for each comparison stage,
/// most significant stage first:
/// 1. Address space. As numbers.
/// 2. Constant offset, (using GEPOperator::accumulateConstantOffset method).
/// 3. Pointer operand type (using cmpType method).
/// 4. Number of operands.
/// 5. Compare operands, using cmpValues method.
int cmpGEPs(const GEPOperator *GEPL, const GEPOperator *GEPR);
int cmpGEPs(const GetElementPtrInst *GEPL, const GetElementPtrInst *GEPR) {
return cmpGEPs(cast<GEPOperator>(GEPL), cast<GEPOperator>(GEPR));
}
/// cmpType - compares two types,
/// defines total ordering among the types set.
///
/// Return values:
/// 0 if types are equal,
/// -1 if Left is less than Right,
/// +1 if Left is greater than Right.
///
/// Description:
/// Comparison is broken onto stages. Like in lexicographical comparison
/// stage coming first has higher priority.
/// On each explanation stage keep in mind total ordering properties.
///
/// 0. Before comparison we coerce pointer types of 0 address space to
/// integer.
/// We also don't bother with same type at left and right, so
/// just return 0 in this case.
///
/// 1. If types are of different kind (different type IDs).
/// Return result of type IDs comparison, treating them as numbers.
/// 2. If types are vectors or integers, compare Type* values as numbers.
/// 3. Types has same ID, so check whether they belongs to the next group:
/// * Void
/// * Float
/// * Double
/// * X86_FP80
/// * FP128
/// * PPC_FP128
/// * Label
/// * Metadata
/// If so - return 0, yes - we can treat these types as equal only because
/// their IDs are same.
/// 4. If Left and Right are pointers, return result of address space
/// comparison (numbers comparison). We can treat pointer types of same
/// address space as equal.
/// 5. If types are complex.
/// Then both Left and Right are to be expanded and their element types will
/// be checked with the same way. If we get Res != 0 on some stage, return it.
/// Otherwise return 0.
/// 6. For all other cases put llvm_unreachable.
int cmpTypes(Type *TyL, Type *TyR) const;
int cmpNumbers(uint64_t L, uint64_t R) const;
int cmpAPInts(const APInt &L, const APInt &R) const;
int cmpAPFloats(const APFloat &L, const APFloat &R) const;
int cmpStrings(StringRef L, StringRef R) const;
int cmpAttrs(const AttributeSet L, const AttributeSet R) const;
// The two functions undergoing comparison.
const Function *FnL, *FnR;
/// Assign serial numbers to values from left function, and values from
/// right function.
/// Explanation:
/// Being comparing functions we need to compare values we meet at left and
/// right sides.
/// Its easy to sort things out for external values. It just should be
/// the same value at left and right.
/// But for local values (those were introduced inside function body)
/// we have to ensure they were introduced at exactly the same place,
/// and plays the same role.
/// Let's assign serial number to each value when we meet it first time.
/// Values that were met at same place will be with same serial numbers.
/// In this case it would be good to explain few points about values assigned
/// to BBs and other ways of implementation (see below).
///
/// 1. Safety of BB reordering.
/// It's safe to change the order of BasicBlocks in function.
/// Relationship with other functions and serial numbering will not be
/// changed in this case.
/// As follows from FunctionComparator::compare(), we do CFG walk: we start
/// from the entry, and then take each terminator. So it doesn't matter how in
/// fact BBs are ordered in function. And since cmpValues are called during
/// this walk, the numbering depends only on how BBs located inside the CFG.
/// So the answer is - yes. We will get the same numbering.
///
/// 2. Impossibility to use dominance properties of values.
/// If we compare two instruction operands: first is usage of local
/// variable AL from function FL, and second is usage of local variable AR
/// from FR, we could compare their origins and check whether they are
/// defined at the same place.
/// But, we are still not able to compare operands of PHI nodes, since those
/// could be operands from further BBs we didn't scan yet.
/// So it's impossible to use dominance properties in general.
DenseMap<const Value*, int> sn_mapL, sn_mapR;
};
class FunctionNode {
AssertingVH<Function> F;
public:
FunctionNode(Function *F) : F(F) {}
Function *getFunc() const { return F; }
void release() { F = 0; }
bool operator<(const FunctionNode &RHS) const {
return (FunctionComparator(F, RHS.getFunc()).compare()) == -1;
}
};
}
int FunctionComparator::cmpNumbers(uint64_t L, uint64_t R) const {
if (L < R) return -1;
if (L > R) return 1;
return 0;
}
int FunctionComparator::cmpAPInts(const APInt &L, const APInt &R) const {
if (int Res = cmpNumbers(L.getBitWidth(), R.getBitWidth()))
return Res;
if (L.ugt(R)) return 1;
if (R.ugt(L)) return -1;
return 0;
}
int FunctionComparator::cmpAPFloats(const APFloat &L, const APFloat &R) const {
if (int Res = cmpNumbers((uint64_t)&L.getSemantics(),
(uint64_t)&R.getSemantics()))
return Res;
return cmpAPInts(L.bitcastToAPInt(), R.bitcastToAPInt());
}
int FunctionComparator::cmpStrings(StringRef L, StringRef R) const {
// Prevent heavy comparison, compare sizes first.
if (int Res = cmpNumbers(L.size(), R.size()))
return Res;
// Compare strings lexicographically only when it is necessary: only when
// strings are equal in size.
return L.compare(R);
}
int FunctionComparator::cmpAttrs(const AttributeSet L,
const AttributeSet R) const {
if (int Res = cmpNumbers(L.getNumSlots(), R.getNumSlots()))
return Res;
for (unsigned i = 0, e = L.getNumSlots(); i != e; ++i) {
AttributeSet::iterator LI = L.begin(i), LE = L.end(i), RI = R.begin(i),
RE = R.end(i);
for (; LI != LE && RI != RE; ++LI, ++RI) {
Attribute LA = *LI;
Attribute RA = *RI;
if (LA < RA)
return -1;
if (RA < LA)
return 1;
}
if (LI != LE)
return 1;
if (RI != RE)
return -1;
}
return 0;
}
/// Constants comparison:
/// 1. Check whether type of L constant could be losslessly bitcasted to R
/// type.
/// 2. Compare constant contents.
/// For more details see declaration comments.
int FunctionComparator::cmpConstants(const Constant *L, const Constant *R) {
Type *TyL = L->getType();
Type *TyR = R->getType();
// Check whether types are bitcastable. This part is just re-factored
// Type::canLosslesslyBitCastTo method, but instead of returning true/false,
// we also pack into result which type is "less" for us.
int TypesRes = cmpTypes(TyL, TyR);
if (TypesRes != 0) {
// Types are different, but check whether we can bitcast them.
if (!TyL->isFirstClassType()) {
if (TyR->isFirstClassType())
return -1;
// Neither TyL nor TyR are values of first class type. Return the result
// of comparing the types
return TypesRes;
}
if (!TyR->isFirstClassType()) {
if (TyL->isFirstClassType())
return 1;
return TypesRes;
}
// Vector -> Vector conversions are always lossless if the two vector types
// have the same size, otherwise not.
unsigned TyLWidth = 0;
unsigned TyRWidth = 0;
if (const VectorType *VecTyL = dyn_cast<VectorType>(TyL))
TyLWidth = VecTyL->getBitWidth();
if (const VectorType *VecTyR = dyn_cast<VectorType>(TyR))
TyRWidth = VecTyR->getBitWidth();
if (TyLWidth != TyRWidth)
return cmpNumbers(TyLWidth, TyRWidth);
// Zero bit-width means neither TyL nor TyR are vectors.
if (!TyLWidth) {
PointerType *PTyL = dyn_cast<PointerType>(TyL);
PointerType *PTyR = dyn_cast<PointerType>(TyR);
if (PTyL && PTyR) {
unsigned AddrSpaceL = PTyL->getAddressSpace();
unsigned AddrSpaceR = PTyR->getAddressSpace();
if (int Res = cmpNumbers(AddrSpaceL, AddrSpaceR))
return Res;
}
if (PTyL)
return 1;
if (PTyR)
return -1;
// TyL and TyR aren't vectors, nor pointers. We don't know how to
// bitcast them.
return TypesRes;
}
}
// OK, types are bitcastable, now check constant contents.
if (L->isNullValue() && R->isNullValue())
return TypesRes;
if (L->isNullValue() && !R->isNullValue())
return 1;
if (!L->isNullValue() && R->isNullValue())
return -1;
if (int Res = cmpNumbers(L->getValueID(), R->getValueID()))
return Res;
switch (L->getValueID()) {
case Value::UndefValueVal: return TypesRes;
case Value::ConstantIntVal: {
const APInt &LInt = cast<ConstantInt>(L)->getValue();
const APInt &RInt = cast<ConstantInt>(R)->getValue();
return cmpAPInts(LInt, RInt);
}
case Value::ConstantFPVal: {
const APFloat &LAPF = cast<ConstantFP>(L)->getValueAPF();
const APFloat &RAPF = cast<ConstantFP>(R)->getValueAPF();
return cmpAPFloats(LAPF, RAPF);
}
case Value::ConstantArrayVal: {
const ConstantArray *LA = cast<ConstantArray>(L);
const ConstantArray *RA = cast<ConstantArray>(R);
uint64_t NumElementsL = cast<ArrayType>(TyL)->getNumElements();
uint64_t NumElementsR = cast<ArrayType>(TyR)->getNumElements();
if (int Res = cmpNumbers(NumElementsL, NumElementsR))
return Res;
for (uint64_t i = 0; i < NumElementsL; ++i) {
if (int Res = cmpConstants(cast<Constant>(LA->getOperand(i)),
cast<Constant>(RA->getOperand(i))))
return Res;
}
return 0;
}
case Value::ConstantStructVal: {
const ConstantStruct *LS = cast<ConstantStruct>(L);
const ConstantStruct *RS = cast<ConstantStruct>(R);
unsigned NumElementsL = cast<StructType>(TyL)->getNumElements();
unsigned NumElementsR = cast<StructType>(TyR)->getNumElements();
if (int Res = cmpNumbers(NumElementsL, NumElementsR))
return Res;
for (unsigned i = 0; i != NumElementsL; ++i) {
if (int Res = cmpConstants(cast<Constant>(LS->getOperand(i)),
cast<Constant>(RS->getOperand(i))))
return Res;
}
return 0;
}
case Value::ConstantVectorVal: {
const ConstantVector *LV = cast<ConstantVector>(L);
const ConstantVector *RV = cast<ConstantVector>(R);
unsigned NumElementsL = cast<VectorType>(TyL)->getNumElements();
unsigned NumElementsR = cast<VectorType>(TyR)->getNumElements();
if (int Res = cmpNumbers(NumElementsL, NumElementsR))
return Res;
for (uint64_t i = 0; i < NumElementsL; ++i) {
if (int Res = cmpConstants(cast<Constant>(LV->getOperand(i)),
cast<Constant>(RV->getOperand(i))))
return Res;
}
return 0;
}
case Value::ConstantExprVal: {
const ConstantExpr *LE = cast<ConstantExpr>(L);
const ConstantExpr *RE = cast<ConstantExpr>(R);
unsigned NumOperandsL = LE->getNumOperands();
unsigned NumOperandsR = RE->getNumOperands();
if (int Res = cmpNumbers(NumOperandsL, NumOperandsR))
return Res;
for (unsigned i = 0; i < NumOperandsL; ++i) {
if (int Res = cmpConstants(cast<Constant>(LE->getOperand(i)),
cast<Constant>(RE->getOperand(i))))
return Res;
}
return 0;
}
case Value::FunctionVal:
case Value::GlobalVariableVal:
case Value::GlobalAliasVal:
default: // Unknown constant, cast L and R pointers to numbers and compare.
return cmpNumbers((uint64_t)L, (uint64_t)R);
}
}
/// cmpType - compares two types,
/// defines total ordering among the types set.
/// See method declaration comments for more details.
int FunctionComparator::cmpTypes(Type *TyL, Type *TyR) const {
PointerType *PTyL = dyn_cast<PointerType>(TyL);
PointerType *PTyR = dyn_cast<PointerType>(TyR);
const DataLayout &DL = FnL->getParent()->getDataLayout();
if (PTyL && PTyL->getAddressSpace() == 0)
TyL = DL.getIntPtrType(TyL);
if (PTyR && PTyR->getAddressSpace() == 0)
TyR = DL.getIntPtrType(TyR);
if (TyL == TyR)
return 0;
if (int Res = cmpNumbers(TyL->getTypeID(), TyR->getTypeID()))
return Res;
switch (TyL->getTypeID()) {
default:
llvm_unreachable("Unknown type!");
// Fall through in Release mode.
case Type::IntegerTyID:
case Type::VectorTyID:
// TyL == TyR would have returned true earlier.
return cmpNumbers((uint64_t)TyL, (uint64_t)TyR);
case Type::VoidTyID:
case Type::FloatTyID:
case Type::DoubleTyID:
case Type::X86_FP80TyID:
case Type::FP128TyID:
case Type::PPC_FP128TyID:
case Type::LabelTyID:
case Type::MetadataTyID:
return 0;
case Type::PointerTyID: {
assert(PTyL && PTyR && "Both types must be pointers here.");
return cmpNumbers(PTyL->getAddressSpace(), PTyR->getAddressSpace());
}
case Type::StructTyID: {
StructType *STyL = cast<StructType>(TyL);
StructType *STyR = cast<StructType>(TyR);
if (STyL->getNumElements() != STyR->getNumElements())
return cmpNumbers(STyL->getNumElements(), STyR->getNumElements());
if (STyL->isPacked() != STyR->isPacked())
return cmpNumbers(STyL->isPacked(), STyR->isPacked());
for (unsigned i = 0, e = STyL->getNumElements(); i != e; ++i) {
if (int Res = cmpTypes(STyL->getElementType(i), STyR->getElementType(i)))
return Res;
}
return 0;
}
case Type::FunctionTyID: {
FunctionType *FTyL = cast<FunctionType>(TyL);
FunctionType *FTyR = cast<FunctionType>(TyR);
if (FTyL->getNumParams() != FTyR->getNumParams())
return cmpNumbers(FTyL->getNumParams(), FTyR->getNumParams());
if (FTyL->isVarArg() != FTyR->isVarArg())
return cmpNumbers(FTyL->isVarArg(), FTyR->isVarArg());
if (int Res = cmpTypes(FTyL->getReturnType(), FTyR->getReturnType()))
return Res;
for (unsigned i = 0, e = FTyL->getNumParams(); i != e; ++i) {
if (int Res = cmpTypes(FTyL->getParamType(i), FTyR->getParamType(i)))
return Res;
}
return 0;
}
case Type::ArrayTyID: {
ArrayType *ATyL = cast<ArrayType>(TyL);
ArrayType *ATyR = cast<ArrayType>(TyR);
if (ATyL->getNumElements() != ATyR->getNumElements())
return cmpNumbers(ATyL->getNumElements(), ATyR->getNumElements());
return cmpTypes(ATyL->getElementType(), ATyR->getElementType());
}
}
}
// Determine whether the two operations are the same except that pointer-to-A
// and pointer-to-B are equivalent. This should be kept in sync with
// Instruction::isSameOperationAs.
// Read method declaration comments for more details.
int FunctionComparator::cmpOperations(const Instruction *L,
const Instruction *R) const {
// Differences from Instruction::isSameOperationAs:
// * replace type comparison with calls to isEquivalentType.
// * we test for I->hasSameSubclassOptionalData (nuw/nsw/tail) at the top
// * because of the above, we don't test for the tail bit on calls later on
if (int Res = cmpNumbers(L->getOpcode(), R->getOpcode()))
return Res;
if (int Res = cmpNumbers(L->getNumOperands(), R->getNumOperands()))
return Res;
if (int Res = cmpTypes(L->getType(), R->getType()))
return Res;
if (int Res = cmpNumbers(L->getRawSubclassOptionalData(),
R->getRawSubclassOptionalData()))
return Res;
// We have two instructions of identical opcode and #operands. Check to see
// if all operands are the same type
for (unsigned i = 0, e = L->getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i) {
if (int Res =
cmpTypes(L->getOperand(i)->getType(), R->getOperand(i)->getType()))
return Res;
}
// Check special state that is a part of some instructions.
if (const LoadInst *LI = dyn_cast<LoadInst>(L)) {
if (int Res = cmpNumbers(LI->isVolatile(), cast<LoadInst>(R)->isVolatile()))
return Res;
if (int Res =
cmpNumbers(LI->getAlignment(), cast<LoadInst>(R)->getAlignment()))
return Res;
if (int Res =
cmpNumbers(LI->getOrdering(), cast<LoadInst>(R)->getOrdering()))
return Res;
if (int Res =
cmpNumbers(LI->getSynchScope(), cast<LoadInst>(R)->getSynchScope()))
return Res;
return cmpNumbers((uint64_t)LI->getMetadata(LLVMContext::MD_range),
(uint64_t)cast<LoadInst>(R)->getMetadata(LLVMContext::MD_range));
}
if (const StoreInst *SI = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(L)) {
if (int Res =
cmpNumbers(SI->isVolatile(), cast<StoreInst>(R)->isVolatile()))
return Res;
if (int Res =
cmpNumbers(SI->getAlignment(), cast<StoreInst>(R)->getAlignment()))
return Res;
if (int Res =
cmpNumbers(SI->getOrdering(), cast<StoreInst>(R)->getOrdering()))
return Res;
return cmpNumbers(SI->getSynchScope(), cast<StoreInst>(R)->getSynchScope());
}
if (const CmpInst *CI = dyn_cast<CmpInst>(L))
return cmpNumbers(CI->getPredicate(), cast<CmpInst>(R)->getPredicate());
if (const CallInst *CI = dyn_cast<CallInst>(L)) {
if (int Res = cmpNumbers(CI->getCallingConv(),
cast<CallInst>(R)->getCallingConv()))
return Res;
if (int Res =
cmpAttrs(CI->getAttributes(), cast<CallInst>(R)->getAttributes()))
return Res;
return cmpNumbers(
(uint64_t)CI->getMetadata(LLVMContext::MD_range),
(uint64_t)cast<CallInst>(R)->getMetadata(LLVMContext::MD_range));
}
if (const InvokeInst *CI = dyn_cast<InvokeInst>(L)) {
if (int Res = cmpNumbers(CI->getCallingConv(),
cast<InvokeInst>(R)->getCallingConv()))
return Res;
if (int Res =
cmpAttrs(CI->getAttributes(), cast<InvokeInst>(R)->getAttributes()))
return Res;
return cmpNumbers(
(uint64_t)CI->getMetadata(LLVMContext::MD_range),
(uint64_t)cast<InvokeInst>(R)->getMetadata(LLVMContext::MD_range));
}
if (const InsertValueInst *IVI = dyn_cast<InsertValueInst>(L)) {
ArrayRef<unsigned> LIndices = IVI->getIndices();
ArrayRef<unsigned> RIndices = cast<InsertValueInst>(R)->getIndices();
if (int Res = cmpNumbers(LIndices.size(), RIndices.size()))
return Res;
for (size_t i = 0, e = LIndices.size(); i != e; ++i) {
if (int Res = cmpNumbers(LIndices[i], RIndices[i]))
return Res;
}
}
if (const ExtractValueInst *EVI = dyn_cast<ExtractValueInst>(L)) {
ArrayRef<unsigned> LIndices = EVI->getIndices();
ArrayRef<unsigned> RIndices = cast<ExtractValueInst>(R)->getIndices();
if (int Res = cmpNumbers(LIndices.size(), RIndices.size()))
return Res;
for (size_t i = 0, e = LIndices.size(); i != e; ++i) {
if (int Res = cmpNumbers(LIndices[i], RIndices[i]))
return Res;
}
}
if (const FenceInst *FI = dyn_cast<FenceInst>(L)) {
if (int Res =
cmpNumbers(FI->getOrdering(), cast<FenceInst>(R)->getOrdering()))
return Res;
return cmpNumbers(FI->getSynchScope(), cast<FenceInst>(R)->getSynchScope());
}
if (const AtomicCmpXchgInst *CXI = dyn_cast<AtomicCmpXchgInst>(L)) {
if (int Res = cmpNumbers(CXI->isVolatile(),
cast<AtomicCmpXchgInst>(R)->isVolatile()))
return Res;
if (int Res = cmpNumbers(CXI->isWeak(),
cast<AtomicCmpXchgInst>(R)->isWeak()))
return Res;
if (int Res = cmpNumbers(CXI->getSuccessOrdering(),
cast<AtomicCmpXchgInst>(R)->getSuccessOrdering()))
return Res;
if (int Res = cmpNumbers(CXI->getFailureOrdering(),
cast<AtomicCmpXchgInst>(R)->getFailureOrdering()))
return Res;
return cmpNumbers(CXI->getSynchScope(),
cast<AtomicCmpXchgInst>(R)->getSynchScope());
}
if (const AtomicRMWInst *RMWI = dyn_cast<AtomicRMWInst>(L)) {
if (int Res = cmpNumbers(RMWI->getOperation(),
cast<AtomicRMWInst>(R)->getOperation()))
return Res;
if (int Res = cmpNumbers(RMWI->isVolatile(),
cast<AtomicRMWInst>(R)->isVolatile()))
return Res;
if (int Res = cmpNumbers(RMWI->getOrdering(),
cast<AtomicRMWInst>(R)->getOrdering()))
return Res;
return cmpNumbers(RMWI->getSynchScope(),
cast<AtomicRMWInst>(R)->getSynchScope());
}
return 0;
}
// Determine whether two GEP operations perform the same underlying arithmetic.
// Read method declaration comments for more details.
int FunctionComparator::cmpGEPs(const GEPOperator *GEPL,
const GEPOperator *GEPR) {
unsigned int ASL = GEPL->getPointerAddressSpace();
unsigned int ASR = GEPR->getPointerAddressSpace();
if (int Res = cmpNumbers(ASL, ASR))
return Res;
// When we have target data, we can reduce the GEP down to the value in bytes
// added to the address.
const DataLayout &DL = FnL->getParent()->getDataLayout();
unsigned BitWidth = DL.getPointerSizeInBits(ASL);
APInt OffsetL(BitWidth, 0), OffsetR(BitWidth, 0);
if (GEPL->accumulateConstantOffset(DL, OffsetL) &&
GEPR->accumulateConstantOffset(DL, OffsetR))
return cmpAPInts(OffsetL, OffsetR);
if (int Res = cmpNumbers((uint64_t)GEPL->getPointerOperand()->getType(),
(uint64_t)GEPR->getPointerOperand()->getType()))
return Res;
if (int Res = cmpNumbers(GEPL->getNumOperands(), GEPR->getNumOperands()))
return Res;
for (unsigned i = 0, e = GEPL->getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i) {
if (int Res = cmpValues(GEPL->getOperand(i), GEPR->getOperand(i)))
return Res;
}
return 0;
}
/// Compare two values used by the two functions under pair-wise comparison. If
/// this is the first time the values are seen, they're added to the mapping so
/// that we will detect mismatches on next use.
/// See comments in declaration for more details.
int FunctionComparator::cmpValues(const Value *L, const Value *R) {
// Catch self-reference case.
if (L == FnL) {
if (R == FnR)
return 0;
return -1;
}
if (R == FnR) {
if (L == FnL)
return 0;
return 1;
}
const Constant *ConstL = dyn_cast<Constant>(L);
const Constant *ConstR = dyn_cast<Constant>(R);
if (ConstL && ConstR) {
if (L == R)
return 0;
return cmpConstants(ConstL, ConstR);
}
if (ConstL)
return 1;
if (ConstR)
return -1;
const InlineAsm *InlineAsmL = dyn_cast<InlineAsm>(L);
const InlineAsm *InlineAsmR = dyn_cast<InlineAsm>(R);
if (InlineAsmL && InlineAsmR)
return cmpNumbers((uint64_t)L, (uint64_t)R);
if (InlineAsmL)
return 1;
if (InlineAsmR)
return -1;
auto LeftSN = sn_mapL.insert(std::make_pair(L, sn_mapL.size())),
RightSN = sn_mapR.insert(std::make_pair(R, sn_mapR.size()));
return cmpNumbers(LeftSN.first->second, RightSN.first->second);
}
// Test whether two basic blocks have equivalent behaviour.
int FunctionComparator::compare(const BasicBlock *BBL, const BasicBlock *BBR) {
BasicBlock::const_iterator InstL = BBL->begin(), InstLE = BBL->end();
BasicBlock::const_iterator InstR = BBR->begin(), InstRE = BBR->end();
do {
if (int Res = cmpValues(InstL, InstR))
return Res;
const GetElementPtrInst *GEPL = dyn_cast<GetElementPtrInst>(InstL);
const GetElementPtrInst *GEPR = dyn_cast<GetElementPtrInst>(InstR);
if (GEPL && !GEPR)
return 1;
if (GEPR && !GEPL)
return -1;
if (GEPL && GEPR) {
if (int Res =
cmpValues(GEPL->getPointerOperand(), GEPR->getPointerOperand()))
return Res;
if (int Res = cmpGEPs(GEPL, GEPR))
return Res;
} else {
if (int Res = cmpOperations(InstL, InstR))
return Res;
assert(InstL->getNumOperands() == InstR->getNumOperands());
for (unsigned i = 0, e = InstL->getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i) {
Value *OpL = InstL->getOperand(i);
Value *OpR = InstR->getOperand(i);
if (int Res = cmpValues(OpL, OpR))
return Res;
if (int Res = cmpNumbers(OpL->getValueID(), OpR->getValueID()))
return Res;
// TODO: Already checked in cmpOperation
if (int Res = cmpTypes(OpL->getType(), OpR->getType()))
return Res;
}
}
++InstL, ++InstR;
} while (InstL != InstLE && InstR != InstRE);
if (InstL != InstLE && InstR == InstRE)
return 1;
if (InstL == InstLE && InstR != InstRE)
return -1;
return 0;
}
// Test whether the two functions have equivalent behaviour.
int FunctionComparator::compare() {
sn_mapL.clear();
sn_mapR.clear();
if (int Res = cmpAttrs(FnL->getAttributes(), FnR->getAttributes()))
return Res;
if (int Res = cmpNumbers(FnL->hasGC(), FnR->hasGC()))
return Res;
if (FnL->hasGC()) {
if (int Res = cmpNumbers((uint64_t)FnL->getGC(), (uint64_t)FnR->getGC()))
return Res;
}
if (int Res = cmpNumbers(FnL->hasSection(), FnR->hasSection()))
return Res;
if (FnL->hasSection()) {
if (int Res = cmpStrings(FnL->getSection(), FnR->getSection()))
return Res;
}
if (int Res = cmpNumbers(FnL->isVarArg(), FnR->isVarArg()))
return Res;
// TODO: if it's internal and only used in direct calls, we could handle this
// case too.
if (int Res = cmpNumbers(FnL->getCallingConv(), FnR->getCallingConv()))
return Res;
if (int Res = cmpTypes(FnL->getFunctionType(), FnR->getFunctionType()))
return Res;
assert(FnL->arg_size() == FnR->arg_size() &&
"Identically typed functions have different numbers of args!");
// Visit the arguments so that they get enumerated in the order they're
// passed in.
for (Function::const_arg_iterator ArgLI = FnL->arg_begin(),
ArgRI = FnR->arg_begin(),
ArgLE = FnL->arg_end();
ArgLI != ArgLE; ++ArgLI, ++ArgRI) {
if (cmpValues(ArgLI, ArgRI) != 0)
llvm_unreachable("Arguments repeat!");
}
// We do a CFG-ordered walk since the actual ordering of the blocks in the
// linked list is immaterial. Our walk starts at the entry block for both
// functions, then takes each block from each terminator in order. As an
// artifact, this also means that unreachable blocks are ignored.
SmallVector<const BasicBlock *, 8> FnLBBs, FnRBBs;
SmallSet<const BasicBlock *, 128> VisitedBBs; // in terms of F1.
FnLBBs.push_back(&FnL->getEntryBlock());
FnRBBs.push_back(&FnR->getEntryBlock());
VisitedBBs.insert(FnLBBs[0]);
while (!FnLBBs.empty()) {
const BasicBlock *BBL = FnLBBs.pop_back_val();
const BasicBlock *BBR = FnRBBs.pop_back_val();
if (int Res = cmpValues(BBL, BBR))
return Res;
if (int Res = compare(BBL, BBR))
return Res;
const TerminatorInst *TermL = BBL->getTerminator();
const TerminatorInst *TermR = BBR->getTerminator();
assert(TermL->getNumSuccessors() == TermR->getNumSuccessors());
for (unsigned i = 0, e = TermL->getNumSuccessors(); i != e; ++i) {
if (!VisitedBBs.insert(TermL->getSuccessor(i)).second)
2010-05-13 14:45:13 +08:00
continue;
FnLBBs.push_back(TermL->getSuccessor(i));
FnRBBs.push_back(TermR->getSuccessor(i));
}
}
return 0;
}
namespace {
/// MergeFunctions finds functions which will generate identical machine code,
/// by considering all pointer types to be equivalent. Once identified,
/// MergeFunctions will fold them by replacing a call to one to a call to a
/// bitcast of the other.
///
class MergeFunctions : public ModulePass {
public:
static char ID;
MergeFunctions()
: ModulePass(ID), HasGlobalAliases(false) {
initializeMergeFunctionsPass(*PassRegistry::getPassRegistry());
}
bool runOnModule(Module &M) override;
private:
typedef std::set<FunctionNode> FnTreeType;
/// A work queue of functions that may have been modified and should be
/// analyzed again.
std::vector<WeakVH> Deferred;
/// Checks the rules of order relation introduced among functions set.
/// Returns true, if sanity check has been passed, and false if failed.
bool doSanityCheck(std::vector<WeakVH> &Worklist);
/// Insert a ComparableFunction into the FnTree, or merge it away if it's
/// equal to one that's already present.
bool insert(Function *NewFunction);
/// Remove a Function from the FnTree and queue it up for a second sweep of
/// analysis.
void remove(Function *F);
/// Find the functions that use this Value and remove them from FnTree and
/// queue the functions.
void removeUsers(Value *V);
/// Replace all direct calls of Old with calls of New. Will bitcast New if
/// necessary to make types match.
void replaceDirectCallers(Function *Old, Function *New);
/// Merge two equivalent functions. Upon completion, G may be deleted, or may
/// be converted into a thunk. In either case, it should never be visited
/// again.
void mergeTwoFunctions(Function *F, Function *G);
/// Replace G with a thunk or an alias to F. Deletes G.
void writeThunkOrAlias(Function *F, Function *G);
/// Replace G with a simple tail call to bitcast(F). Also replace direct uses
/// of G with bitcast(F). Deletes G.
void writeThunk(Function *F, Function *G);
/// Replace G with an alias to F. Deletes G.
void writeAlias(Function *F, Function *G);
/// The set of all distinct functions. Use the insert() and remove() methods
/// to modify it.
FnTreeType FnTree;
/// Whether or not the target supports global aliases.
bool HasGlobalAliases;
};
} // end anonymous namespace
char MergeFunctions::ID = 0;
INITIALIZE_PASS(MergeFunctions, "mergefunc", "Merge Functions", false, false)
ModulePass *llvm::createMergeFunctionsPass() {
return new MergeFunctions();
}
bool MergeFunctions::doSanityCheck(std::vector<WeakVH> &Worklist) {
if (const unsigned Max = NumFunctionsForSanityCheck) {
unsigned TripleNumber = 0;
bool Valid = true;
dbgs() << "MERGEFUNC-SANITY: Started for first " << Max << " functions.\n";
unsigned i = 0;
for (std::vector<WeakVH>::iterator I = Worklist.begin(), E = Worklist.end();
I != E && i < Max; ++I, ++i) {
unsigned j = i;
for (std::vector<WeakVH>::iterator J = I; J != E && j < Max; ++J, ++j) {
Function *F1 = cast<Function>(*I);
Function *F2 = cast<Function>(*J);
int Res1 = FunctionComparator(F1, F2).compare();
int Res2 = FunctionComparator(F2, F1).compare();
// If F1 <= F2, then F2 >= F1, otherwise report failure.
if (Res1 != -Res2) {
dbgs() << "MERGEFUNC-SANITY: Non-symmetric; triple: " << TripleNumber
<< "\n";
F1->dump();
F2->dump();
Valid = false;
}
if (Res1 == 0)
continue;
unsigned k = j;
for (std::vector<WeakVH>::iterator K = J; K != E && k < Max;
++k, ++K, ++TripleNumber) {
if (K == J)
continue;
Function *F3 = cast<Function>(*K);
int Res3 = FunctionComparator(F1, F3).compare();
int Res4 = FunctionComparator(F2, F3).compare();
bool Transitive = true;
if (Res1 != 0 && Res1 == Res4) {
// F1 > F2, F2 > F3 => F1 > F3
Transitive = Res3 == Res1;
} else if (Res3 != 0 && Res3 == -Res4) {
// F1 > F3, F3 > F2 => F1 > F2
Transitive = Res3 == Res1;
} else if (Res4 != 0 && -Res3 == Res4) {
// F2 > F3, F3 > F1 => F2 > F1
Transitive = Res4 == -Res1;
}
if (!Transitive) {
dbgs() << "MERGEFUNC-SANITY: Non-transitive; triple: "
<< TripleNumber << "\n";
dbgs() << "Res1, Res3, Res4: " << Res1 << ", " << Res3 << ", "
<< Res4 << "\n";
F1->dump();
F2->dump();
F3->dump();
Valid = false;
}
}
}
}
dbgs() << "MERGEFUNC-SANITY: " << (Valid ? "Passed." : "Failed.") << "\n";
return Valid;
}
return true;
}
bool MergeFunctions::runOnModule(Module &M) {
bool Changed = false;
for (Module::iterator I = M.begin(), E = M.end(); I != E; ++I) {
if (!I->isDeclaration() && !I->hasAvailableExternallyLinkage())
Deferred.push_back(WeakVH(I));
}
do {
std::vector<WeakVH> Worklist;
Deferred.swap(Worklist);
DEBUG(doSanityCheck(Worklist));
DEBUG(dbgs() << "size of module: " << M.size() << '\n');
DEBUG(dbgs() << "size of worklist: " << Worklist.size() << '\n');
// Insert only strong functions and merge them. Strong function merging
// always deletes one of them.
for (std::vector<WeakVH>::iterator I = Worklist.begin(),
E = Worklist.end(); I != E; ++I) {
if (!*I) continue;
Function *F = cast<Function>(*I);
if (!F->isDeclaration() && !F->hasAvailableExternallyLinkage() &&
!F->mayBeOverridden()) {
Changed |= insert(F);
}
}
// Insert only weak functions and merge them. By doing these second we
// create thunks to the strong function when possible. When two weak
// functions are identical, we create a new strong function with two weak
// weak thunks to it which are identical but not mergable.
for (std::vector<WeakVH>::iterator I = Worklist.begin(),
E = Worklist.end(); I != E; ++I) {
if (!*I) continue;
Function *F = cast<Function>(*I);
if (!F->isDeclaration() && !F->hasAvailableExternallyLinkage() &&
F->mayBeOverridden()) {
Changed |= insert(F);
}
}
DEBUG(dbgs() << "size of FnTree: " << FnTree.size() << '\n');
} while (!Deferred.empty());
FnTree.clear();
return Changed;
}
// Replace direct callers of Old with New.
void MergeFunctions::replaceDirectCallers(Function *Old, Function *New) {
Constant *BitcastNew = ConstantExpr::getBitCast(New, Old->getType());
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value. This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] llvm-svn: 203364
2014-03-09 11:16:01 +08:00
for (auto UI = Old->use_begin(), UE = Old->use_end(); UI != UE;) {
Use *U = &*UI;
++UI;
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value. This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] llvm-svn: 203364
2014-03-09 11:16:01 +08:00
CallSite CS(U->getUser());
if (CS && CS.isCallee(U)) {
remove(CS.getInstruction()->getParent()->getParent());
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value. This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] llvm-svn: 203364
2014-03-09 11:16:01 +08:00
U->set(BitcastNew);
}
}
}
// Replace G with an alias to F if possible, or else a thunk to F. Deletes G.
void MergeFunctions::writeThunkOrAlias(Function *F, Function *G) {
if (HasGlobalAliases && G->hasUnnamedAddr()) {
if (G->hasExternalLinkage() || G->hasLocalLinkage() ||
G->hasWeakLinkage()) {
writeAlias(F, G);
return;
}
}
writeThunk(F, G);
}
// Helper for writeThunk,
// Selects proper bitcast operation,
// but a bit simpler then CastInst::getCastOpcode.
static Value *createCast(IRBuilder<false> &Builder, Value *V, Type *DestTy) {
Type *SrcTy = V->getType();
if (SrcTy->isStructTy()) {
assert(DestTy->isStructTy());
assert(SrcTy->getStructNumElements() == DestTy->getStructNumElements());
Value *Result = UndefValue::get(DestTy);
for (unsigned int I = 0, E = SrcTy->getStructNumElements(); I < E; ++I) {
Value *Element = createCast(
Builder, Builder.CreateExtractValue(V, makeArrayRef(I)),
DestTy->getStructElementType(I));
Result =
Builder.CreateInsertValue(Result, Element, makeArrayRef(I));
}
return Result;
}
assert(!DestTy->isStructTy());
if (SrcTy->isIntegerTy() && DestTy->isPointerTy())
return Builder.CreateIntToPtr(V, DestTy);
else if (SrcTy->isPointerTy() && DestTy->isIntegerTy())
return Builder.CreatePtrToInt(V, DestTy);
else
return Builder.CreateBitCast(V, DestTy);
}
// Replace G with a simple tail call to bitcast(F). Also replace direct uses
// of G with bitcast(F). Deletes G.
void MergeFunctions::writeThunk(Function *F, Function *G) {
if (!G->mayBeOverridden()) {
// Redirect direct callers of G to F.
replaceDirectCallers(G, F);
}
// If G was internal then we may have replaced all uses of G with F. If so,
// stop here and delete G. There's no need for a thunk.
if (G->hasLocalLinkage() && G->use_empty()) {
G->eraseFromParent();
return;
}
Function *NewG = Function::Create(G->getFunctionType(), G->getLinkage(), "",
G->getParent());
BasicBlock *BB = BasicBlock::Create(F->getContext(), "", NewG);
IRBuilder<false> Builder(BB);
SmallVector<Value *, 16> Args;
unsigned i = 0;
FunctionType *FFTy = F->getFunctionType();
for (Function::arg_iterator AI = NewG->arg_begin(), AE = NewG->arg_end();
AI != AE; ++AI) {
Args.push_back(createCast(Builder, (Value*)AI, FFTy->getParamType(i)));
++i;
}
CallInst *CI = Builder.CreateCall(F, Args);
CI->setTailCall();
CI->setCallingConv(F->getCallingConv());
if (NewG->getReturnType()->isVoidTy()) {
Builder.CreateRetVoid();
} else {
Builder.CreateRet(createCast(Builder, CI, NewG->getReturnType()));
}
NewG->copyAttributesFrom(G);
NewG->takeName(G);
removeUsers(G);
G->replaceAllUsesWith(NewG);
G->eraseFromParent();
DEBUG(dbgs() << "writeThunk: " << NewG->getName() << '\n');
++NumThunksWritten;
}
// Replace G with an alias to F and delete G.
void MergeFunctions::writeAlias(Function *F, Function *G) {
PointerType *PTy = G->getType();
auto *GA = GlobalAlias::create(PTy, G->getLinkage(), "", F);
F->setAlignment(std::max(F->getAlignment(), G->getAlignment()));
GA->takeName(G);
GA->setVisibility(G->getVisibility());
removeUsers(G);
G->replaceAllUsesWith(GA);
G->eraseFromParent();
DEBUG(dbgs() << "writeAlias: " << GA->getName() << '\n');
++NumAliasesWritten;
}
// Merge two equivalent functions. Upon completion, Function G is deleted.
void MergeFunctions::mergeTwoFunctions(Function *F, Function *G) {
if (F->mayBeOverridden()) {
assert(G->mayBeOverridden());
if (HasGlobalAliases) {
// Make them both thunks to the same internal function.
Function *H = Function::Create(F->getFunctionType(), F->getLinkage(), "",
F->getParent());
H->copyAttributesFrom(F);
H->takeName(F);
removeUsers(F);
F->replaceAllUsesWith(H);
unsigned MaxAlignment = std::max(G->getAlignment(), H->getAlignment());
writeAlias(F, G);
writeAlias(F, H);
F->setAlignment(MaxAlignment);
F->setLinkage(GlobalValue::PrivateLinkage);
} else {
// We can't merge them. Instead, pick one and update all direct callers
// to call it and hope that we improve the instruction cache hit rate.
replaceDirectCallers(G, F);
}
++NumDoubleWeak;
} else {
writeThunkOrAlias(F, G);
}
++NumFunctionsMerged;
}
// Insert a ComparableFunction into the FnTree, or merge it away if equal to one
// that was already inserted.
bool MergeFunctions::insert(Function *NewFunction) {
std::pair<FnTreeType::iterator, bool> Result =
FnTree.insert(FunctionNode(NewFunction));
if (Result.second) {
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Inserting as unique: " << NewFunction->getName() << '\n');
return false;
}
const FunctionNode &OldF = *Result.first;
// Don't merge tiny functions, since it can just end up making the function
// larger.
// FIXME: Should still merge them if they are unnamed_addr and produce an
// alias.
if (NewFunction->size() == 1) {
if (NewFunction->front().size() <= 2) {
DEBUG(dbgs() << NewFunction->getName()
<< " is to small to bother merging\n");
return false;
}
}
// Never thunk a strong function to a weak function.
assert(!OldF.getFunc()->mayBeOverridden() || NewFunction->mayBeOverridden());
DEBUG(dbgs() << " " << OldF.getFunc()->getName()
<< " == " << NewFunction->getName() << '\n');
Function *DeleteF = NewFunction;
mergeTwoFunctions(OldF.getFunc(), DeleteF);
return true;
}
// Remove a function from FnTree. If it was already in FnTree, add
// it to Deferred so that we'll look at it in the next round.
void MergeFunctions::remove(Function *F) {
// We need to make sure we remove F, not a function "equal" to F per the
// function equality comparator.
FnTreeType::iterator found = FnTree.find(FunctionNode(F));
size_t Erased = 0;
if (found != FnTree.end() && found->getFunc() == F) {
Erased = 1;
FnTree.erase(found);
}
if (Erased) {
DEBUG(dbgs() << "Removed " << F->getName()
<< " from set and deferred it.\n");
Deferred.push_back(F);
}
}
// For each instruction used by the value, remove() the function that contains
// the instruction. This should happen right before a call to RAUW.
void MergeFunctions::removeUsers(Value *V) {
std::vector<Value *> Worklist;
Worklist.push_back(V);
while (!Worklist.empty()) {
Value *V = Worklist.back();
Worklist.pop_back();
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value. This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] llvm-svn: 203364
2014-03-09 11:16:01 +08:00
for (User *U : V->users()) {
if (Instruction *I = dyn_cast<Instruction>(U)) {
remove(I->getParent()->getParent());
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value. This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] llvm-svn: 203364
2014-03-09 11:16:01 +08:00
} else if (isa<GlobalValue>(U)) {
// do nothing
[C++11] Add range based accessors for the Use-Def chain of a Value. This requires a number of steps. 1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation detail 2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User* iterator. 3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the Use to the User. 4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs. 5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users(). 6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally opaque. Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would touch all of the same lies of code. The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have. I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right move. However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =] llvm-svn: 203364
2014-03-09 11:16:01 +08:00
} else if (Constant *C = dyn_cast<Constant>(U)) {
for (User *UU : C->users())
Worklist.push_back(UU);
}
}
}
}