2016-12-16 17:56:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; NOTE: Assertions have been autogenerated by utils/update_llc_test_checks.py
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mattr=+sse2 -print-schedule | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK --check-prefix=SSE --check-prefix=SSE-RECIP
|
|
|
|
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mattr=+avx -print-schedule | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK --check-prefix=AVX --check-prefix=AVX-RECIP
|
|
|
|
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mattr=+avx,+fma -print-schedule | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK --check-prefix=AVX --check-prefix=FMA-RECIP
|
AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
* All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
* Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...
To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!
# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark Time CPU Time Old Time New CPU Old CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0607 -0.0604 234 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0630 -0.0626 233 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2581 +0.2587 1 2 1 2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0770 -0.0767 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0767 -0.0763 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4170 -0.4156 1 0 1 0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0271 -0.0270 463 450 463 450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0093 -0.0093 453 449 453 449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7280 -0.7280 13 4 13 4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0065 -0.0065 569 565 569 565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0077 -0.0077 569 564 569 564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0077 +1.0068 2 5 2 5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0220 0.0199 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0006 +0.0007 312 312 312 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0031 +0.0032 311 312 311 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7069 -0.7072 4 1 4 1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0015 -0.0015 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0010 -0.0011 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1486 -0.1456 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6139 0.8766 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0008 -0.0005 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0006 -0.0002 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1467 -0.1390 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0137 0.0137 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0002 +0.0002 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0015 -0.0014 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +3.3687 +3.3587 0 2 0 2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.4041 0.3933 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0004 +0.0004 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0000 -0.0000 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1947 +0.1995 0 0 0 0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0074 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0092 +0.0074 547 542 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0054 +0.0115 544 541 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4086 -0.3486 8 5 0 0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.3320 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0015 +0.0204 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0001 +0.0203 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2259 +0.2023 1 1 0 0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0209 -0.0179 96 94 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0182 -0.0155 95 93 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.6164 -0.2703 2 1 2 1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0098 -0.0098 176 175 176 175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0126 -0.0126 176 174 176 174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev +6.9789 +6.9157 0 2 0 2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0237 -0.0238 474 463 474 463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0267 -0.0267 473 461 473 461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.7179 +0.7178 3 5 3 5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6837 0.6554 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0014 -0.0013 1375 1373 1375 1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0018 +0.0019 1371 1374 1371 1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7457 -0.7382 11 3 10 3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0080 -0.0289 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0070 -0.0287 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0977 +0.6614 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0132 +0.0967 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0132 +0.0956 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0407 -0.1695 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0331 +0.1307 13 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0430 +0.1373 12 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.9006 -0.8847 1 0 0 0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0016 0.0010 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0023 -0.0024 395 394 395 394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0029 -0.0030 395 394 395 393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0275 -0.0375 1 1 1 1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0232 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0047 +0.0039 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0050 +0.0037 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0599 -0.2683 1 1 0 0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0206 +0.0207 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0204 +0.0205 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2155 +0.2212 1 1 1 1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0109 -0.0108 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0104 -0.0103 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4919 -0.4800 0 0 0 0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0149 -0.0147 220 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0173 -0.0169 221 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0337 +1.0341 1 3 1 3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0001 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0019 -0.0019 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0021 -0.0021 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4441 -0.4282 0 0 0 0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.4263 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0258 -0.0006 81 83 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0235 -0.0011 81 82 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1634 +0.1070 1 1 0 0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.
llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779
llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-28 04:46:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=bdver2 -print-schedule | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK --check-prefix=AVX --check-prefix=BDVER2
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=btver2 -print-schedule | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK --check-prefix=AVX --check-prefix=BTVER2
|
|
|
|
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=sandybridge -print-schedule | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK --check-prefix=AVX --check-prefix=SANDY
|
|
|
|
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=haswell -print-schedule | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK --check-prefix=AVX --check-prefix=HASWELL
|
|
|
|
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=haswell -print-schedule -mattr=-fma | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK --check-prefix=AVX --check-prefix=HASWELL-NO-FMA
|
|
|
|
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=knl -print-schedule | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK --check-prefix=AVX --check-prefix=AVX512 --check-prefix=KNL
|
|
|
|
; RUN: llc < %s -mtriple=x86_64-unknown-unknown -mcpu=skx -print-schedule | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK --check-prefix=AVX --check-prefix=AVX512 --check-prefix=SKX
|
2016-12-16 17:56:02 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
; It's the extra tests coverage for recip as discussed on D26855.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define float @f32_no_step_2(float %x) #3 {
|
|
|
|
; SSE-LABEL: f32_no_step_2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE: # %bb.0:
|
2016-12-16 17:56:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: rcpss %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-LABEL: f32_no_step_2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP: # %bb.0:
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-LABEL: f32_no_step_2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP: # %bb.0:
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vmulss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-LABEL: f32_no_step_2:
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2: # %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vrcpss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
* All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
* Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...
To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!
# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark Time CPU Time Old Time New CPU Old CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0607 -0.0604 234 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0630 -0.0626 233 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2581 +0.2587 1 2 1 2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0770 -0.0767 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0767 -0.0763 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4170 -0.4156 1 0 1 0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0271 -0.0270 463 450 463 450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0093 -0.0093 453 449 453 449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7280 -0.7280 13 4 13 4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0065 -0.0065 569 565 569 565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0077 -0.0077 569 564 569 564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0077 +1.0068 2 5 2 5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0220 0.0199 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0006 +0.0007 312 312 312 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0031 +0.0032 311 312 311 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7069 -0.7072 4 1 4 1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0015 -0.0015 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0010 -0.0011 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1486 -0.1456 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6139 0.8766 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0008 -0.0005 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0006 -0.0002 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1467 -0.1390 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0137 0.0137 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0002 +0.0002 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0015 -0.0014 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +3.3687 +3.3587 0 2 0 2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.4041 0.3933 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0004 +0.0004 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0000 -0.0000 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1947 +0.1995 0 0 0 0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0074 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0092 +0.0074 547 542 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0054 +0.0115 544 541 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4086 -0.3486 8 5 0 0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.3320 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0015 +0.0204 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0001 +0.0203 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2259 +0.2023 1 1 0 0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0209 -0.0179 96 94 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0182 -0.0155 95 93 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.6164 -0.2703 2 1 2 1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0098 -0.0098 176 175 176 175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0126 -0.0126 176 174 176 174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev +6.9789 +6.9157 0 2 0 2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0237 -0.0238 474 463 474 463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0267 -0.0267 473 461 473 461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.7179 +0.7178 3 5 3 5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6837 0.6554 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0014 -0.0013 1375 1373 1375 1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0018 +0.0019 1371 1374 1371 1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7457 -0.7382 11 3 10 3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0080 -0.0289 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0070 -0.0287 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0977 +0.6614 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0132 +0.0967 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0132 +0.0956 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0407 -0.1695 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0331 +0.1307 13 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0430 +0.1373 12 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.9006 -0.8847 1 0 0 0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0016 0.0010 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0023 -0.0024 395 394 395 394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0029 -0.0030 395 394 395 393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0275 -0.0375 1 1 1 1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0232 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0047 +0.0039 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0050 +0.0037 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0599 -0.2683 1 1 0 0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0206 +0.0207 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0204 +0.0205 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2155 +0.2212 1 1 1 1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0109 -0.0108 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0104 -0.0103 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4919 -0.4800 0 0 0 0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0149 -0.0147 220 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0173 -0.0169 221 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0337 +1.0341 1 3 1 3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0001 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0019 -0.0019 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0021 -0.0021 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4441 -0.4282 0 0 0 0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.4263 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0258 -0.0006 81 83 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0235 -0.0011 81 82 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1634 +0.1070 1 1 0 0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.
llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779
llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-28 04:46:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vmulss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [10:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-LABEL: f32_no_step_2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2: # %bb.0:
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vrcpss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [2:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [7:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-LABEL: f32_no_step_2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY: # %bb.0:
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vrcpss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target.
The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information.
Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB.
Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX.
The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details:
•static latency of the instruction
•number of uOps from which the instruction consists of
•all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs
For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5:
def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> {
let Latency = 9;
let NumMicroOps = 6;
let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1];
}
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>;
Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script.
Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691
llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [11:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-LABEL: f32_no_step_2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL: # %bb.0:
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vrcpss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vmulss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [10:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-LABEL: f32_no_step_2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA: # %bb.0:
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vrcpss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [10:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2017-09-19 14:19:27 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-LABEL: f32_no_step_2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL: # %bb.0:
|
2017-11-06 05:14:05 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vrcpss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vmulss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [10:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2017-09-19 14:19:27 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SKX-LABEL: f32_no_step_2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX: # %bb.0:
|
2017-11-06 05:14:05 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vrcpss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [4:1.00]
|
2017-10-08 20:52:54 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vmulss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [9:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2016-12-16 17:56:02 +08:00
|
|
|
%div = fdiv fast float 1234.0, %x
|
|
|
|
ret float %div
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define float @f32_one_step_2(float %x) #1 {
|
|
|
|
; SSE-LABEL: f32_one_step_2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE: # %bb.0:
|
2016-12-16 17:56:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: rcpss %xmm0, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulss %xmm2, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movss {{.*#+}} xmm1 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: subss %xmm0, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulss %xmm2, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: addss %xmm2, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-LABEL: f32_one_step_2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP: # %bb.0:
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulss %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmovss {{.*#+}} xmm2 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vsubss %xmm0, %xmm2, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulss %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vaddss %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-LABEL: f32_one_step_2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP: # %bb.0:
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm1
|
2018-03-11 05:30:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfnmadd213ss {{.*#+}} xmm0 = -(xmm1 * xmm0) + mem
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfmadd132ss {{.*#+}} xmm0 = (xmm0 * xmm1) + xmm1
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vmulss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-LABEL: f32_one_step_2:
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2: # %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vrcpss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfnmaddss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [10:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfmaddss %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
* All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
* Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...
To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!
# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark Time CPU Time Old Time New CPU Old CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0607 -0.0604 234 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0630 -0.0626 233 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2581 +0.2587 1 2 1 2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0770 -0.0767 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0767 -0.0763 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4170 -0.4156 1 0 1 0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0271 -0.0270 463 450 463 450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0093 -0.0093 453 449 453 449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7280 -0.7280 13 4 13 4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0065 -0.0065 569 565 569 565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0077 -0.0077 569 564 569 564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0077 +1.0068 2 5 2 5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0220 0.0199 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0006 +0.0007 312 312 312 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0031 +0.0032 311 312 311 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7069 -0.7072 4 1 4 1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0015 -0.0015 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0010 -0.0011 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1486 -0.1456 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6139 0.8766 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0008 -0.0005 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0006 -0.0002 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1467 -0.1390 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0137 0.0137 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0002 +0.0002 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0015 -0.0014 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +3.3687 +3.3587 0 2 0 2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.4041 0.3933 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0004 +0.0004 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0000 -0.0000 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1947 +0.1995 0 0 0 0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0074 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0092 +0.0074 547 542 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0054 +0.0115 544 541 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4086 -0.3486 8 5 0 0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.3320 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0015 +0.0204 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0001 +0.0203 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2259 +0.2023 1 1 0 0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0209 -0.0179 96 94 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0182 -0.0155 95 93 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.6164 -0.2703 2 1 2 1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0098 -0.0098 176 175 176 175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0126 -0.0126 176 174 176 174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev +6.9789 +6.9157 0 2 0 2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0237 -0.0238 474 463 474 463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0267 -0.0267 473 461 473 461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.7179 +0.7178 3 5 3 5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6837 0.6554 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0014 -0.0013 1375 1373 1375 1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0018 +0.0019 1371 1374 1371 1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7457 -0.7382 11 3 10 3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0080 -0.0289 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0070 -0.0287 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0977 +0.6614 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0132 +0.0967 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0132 +0.0956 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0407 -0.1695 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0331 +0.1307 13 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0430 +0.1373 12 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.9006 -0.8847 1 0 0 0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0016 0.0010 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0023 -0.0024 395 394 395 394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0029 -0.0030 395 394 395 393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0275 -0.0375 1 1 1 1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0232 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0047 +0.0039 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0050 +0.0037 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0599 -0.2683 1 1 0 0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0206 +0.0207 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0204 +0.0205 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2155 +0.2212 1 1 1 1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0109 -0.0108 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0104 -0.0103 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4919 -0.4800 0 0 0 0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0149 -0.0147 220 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0173 -0.0169 221 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0337 +1.0341 1 3 1 3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0001 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0019 -0.0019 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0021 -0.0021 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4441 -0.4282 0 0 0 0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.4263 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0258 -0.0006 81 83 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0235 -0.0011 81 82 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1634 +0.1070 1 1 0 0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.
llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779
llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-28 04:46:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vmulss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [10:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-LABEL: f32_one_step_2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2: # %bb.0:
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmovss {{.*#+}} xmm2 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vrcpss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [2:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulss %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [2:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vsubss %xmm0, %xmm2, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulss %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [2:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vaddss %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [7:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-LABEL: f32_one_step_2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY: # %bb.0:
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vrcpss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulss %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target.
The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information.
Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB.
Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX.
The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details:
•static latency of the instruction
•number of uOps from which the instruction consists of
•all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs
For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5:
def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> {
let Latency = 9;
let NumMicroOps = 6;
let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1];
}
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>;
Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script.
Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691
llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmovss {{.*#+}} xmm2 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero sched: [6:0.50]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vsubss %xmm0, %xmm2, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulss %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vaddss %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target.
The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information.
Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB.
Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX.
The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details:
•static latency of the instruction
•number of uOps from which the instruction consists of
•all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs
For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5:
def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> {
let Latency = 9;
let NumMicroOps = 6;
let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1];
}
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>;
Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script.
Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691
llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [11:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-LABEL: f32_one_step_2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL: # %bb.0:
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vrcpss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-03-11 05:30:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfnmadd213ss {{.*#+}} xmm0 = -(xmm1 * xmm0) + mem sched: [10:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfmadd132ss {{.*#+}} xmm0 = (xmm0 * xmm1) + xmm1 sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vmulss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [10:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-LABEL: f32_one_step_2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA: # %bb.0:
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vrcpss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulss %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmovss {{.*#+}} xmm2 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vsubss %xmm0, %xmm2, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulss %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vaddss %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [10:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2017-09-19 14:19:27 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-LABEL: f32_one_step_2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL: # %bb.0:
|
2017-11-06 05:14:05 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vrcpss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-03-11 05:30:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vfnmadd213ss {{.*#+}} xmm0 = -(xmm1 * xmm0) + mem sched: [10:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vfmadd132ss {{.*#+}} xmm0 = (xmm0 * xmm1) + xmm1 sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vmulss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [10:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2017-09-19 14:19:27 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SKX-LABEL: f32_one_step_2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX: # %bb.0:
|
2017-11-06 05:14:05 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vrcpss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [4:1.00]
|
2018-03-11 05:30:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vfnmadd213ss {{.*#+}} xmm0 = -(xmm1 * xmm0) + mem sched: [9:0.50]
|
2018-06-11 22:37:53 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vfmadd132ss {{.*#+}} xmm0 = (xmm0 * xmm1) + xmm1 sched: [4:0.50]
|
2017-10-08 20:52:54 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vmulss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [9:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2016-12-16 17:56:02 +08:00
|
|
|
%div = fdiv fast float 3456.0, %x
|
|
|
|
ret float %div
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
define float @f32_one_step_2_divs(float %x) #1 {
|
|
|
|
; SSE-LABEL: f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE: # %bb.0:
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: rcpss %xmm0, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulss %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movss {{.*#+}} xmm2 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: subss %xmm0, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulss %xmm1, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: addss %xmm1, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movss {{.*#+}} xmm0 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulss %xmm2, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulss %xmm2, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-LABEL: f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP: # %bb.0:
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulss %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmovss {{.*#+}} xmm2 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vsubss %xmm0, %xmm2, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulss %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vaddss %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulss %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-LABEL: f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP: # %bb.0:
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm1
|
2018-03-11 05:30:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfnmadd213ss {{.*#+}} xmm0 = -(xmm1 * xmm0) + mem
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfmadd132ss {{.*#+}} xmm0 = (xmm0 * xmm1) + xmm1
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vmulss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vmulss %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-LABEL: f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2: # %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vrcpss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfnmaddss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [10:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfmaddss %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
* All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
* Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...
To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!
# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark Time CPU Time Old Time New CPU Old CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0607 -0.0604 234 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0630 -0.0626 233 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2581 +0.2587 1 2 1 2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0770 -0.0767 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0767 -0.0763 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4170 -0.4156 1 0 1 0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0271 -0.0270 463 450 463 450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0093 -0.0093 453 449 453 449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7280 -0.7280 13 4 13 4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0065 -0.0065 569 565 569 565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0077 -0.0077 569 564 569 564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0077 +1.0068 2 5 2 5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0220 0.0199 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0006 +0.0007 312 312 312 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0031 +0.0032 311 312 311 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7069 -0.7072 4 1 4 1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0015 -0.0015 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0010 -0.0011 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1486 -0.1456 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6139 0.8766 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0008 -0.0005 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0006 -0.0002 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1467 -0.1390 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0137 0.0137 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0002 +0.0002 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0015 -0.0014 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +3.3687 +3.3587 0 2 0 2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.4041 0.3933 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0004 +0.0004 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0000 -0.0000 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1947 +0.1995 0 0 0 0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0074 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0092 +0.0074 547 542 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0054 +0.0115 544 541 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4086 -0.3486 8 5 0 0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.3320 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0015 +0.0204 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0001 +0.0203 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2259 +0.2023 1 1 0 0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0209 -0.0179 96 94 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0182 -0.0155 95 93 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.6164 -0.2703 2 1 2 1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0098 -0.0098 176 175 176 175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0126 -0.0126 176 174 176 174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev +6.9789 +6.9157 0 2 0 2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0237 -0.0238 474 463 474 463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0267 -0.0267 473 461 473 461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.7179 +0.7178 3 5 3 5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6837 0.6554 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0014 -0.0013 1375 1373 1375 1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0018 +0.0019 1371 1374 1371 1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7457 -0.7382 11 3 10 3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0080 -0.0289 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0070 -0.0287 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0977 +0.6614 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0132 +0.0967 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0132 +0.0956 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0407 -0.1695 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0331 +0.1307 13 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0430 +0.1373 12 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.9006 -0.8847 1 0 0 0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0016 0.0010 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0023 -0.0024 395 394 395 394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0029 -0.0030 395 394 395 393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0275 -0.0375 1 1 1 1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0232 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0047 +0.0039 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0050 +0.0037 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0599 -0.2683 1 1 0 0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0206 +0.0207 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0204 +0.0205 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2155 +0.2212 1 1 1 1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0109 -0.0108 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0104 -0.0103 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4919 -0.4800 0 0 0 0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0149 -0.0147 220 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0173 -0.0169 221 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0337 +1.0341 1 3 1 3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0001 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0019 -0.0019 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0021 -0.0021 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4441 -0.4282 0 0 0 0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.4263 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0258 -0.0006 81 83 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0235 -0.0011 81 82 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1634 +0.1070 1 1 0 0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.
llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779
llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-28 04:46:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vmulss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [10:1.00]
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vmulss %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
* All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
* Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...
To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!
# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark Time CPU Time Old Time New CPU Old CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0607 -0.0604 234 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0630 -0.0626 233 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2581 +0.2587 1 2 1 2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0770 -0.0767 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0767 -0.0763 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4170 -0.4156 1 0 1 0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0271 -0.0270 463 450 463 450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0093 -0.0093 453 449 453 449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7280 -0.7280 13 4 13 4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0065 -0.0065 569 565 569 565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0077 -0.0077 569 564 569 564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0077 +1.0068 2 5 2 5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0220 0.0199 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0006 +0.0007 312 312 312 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0031 +0.0032 311 312 311 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7069 -0.7072 4 1 4 1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0015 -0.0015 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0010 -0.0011 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1486 -0.1456 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6139 0.8766 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0008 -0.0005 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0006 -0.0002 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1467 -0.1390 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0137 0.0137 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0002 +0.0002 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0015 -0.0014 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +3.3687 +3.3587 0 2 0 2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.4041 0.3933 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0004 +0.0004 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0000 -0.0000 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1947 +0.1995 0 0 0 0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0074 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0092 +0.0074 547 542 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0054 +0.0115 544 541 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4086 -0.3486 8 5 0 0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.3320 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0015 +0.0204 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0001 +0.0203 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2259 +0.2023 1 1 0 0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0209 -0.0179 96 94 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0182 -0.0155 95 93 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.6164 -0.2703 2 1 2 1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0098 -0.0098 176 175 176 175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0126 -0.0126 176 174 176 174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev +6.9789 +6.9157 0 2 0 2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0237 -0.0238 474 463 474 463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0267 -0.0267 473 461 473 461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.7179 +0.7178 3 5 3 5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6837 0.6554 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0014 -0.0013 1375 1373 1375 1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0018 +0.0019 1371 1374 1371 1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7457 -0.7382 11 3 10 3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0080 -0.0289 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0070 -0.0287 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0977 +0.6614 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0132 +0.0967 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0132 +0.0956 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0407 -0.1695 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0331 +0.1307 13 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0430 +0.1373 12 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.9006 -0.8847 1 0 0 0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0016 0.0010 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0023 -0.0024 395 394 395 394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0029 -0.0030 395 394 395 393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0275 -0.0375 1 1 1 1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0232 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0047 +0.0039 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0050 +0.0037 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0599 -0.2683 1 1 0 0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0206 +0.0207 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0204 +0.0205 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2155 +0.2212 1 1 1 1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0109 -0.0108 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0104 -0.0103 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4919 -0.4800 0 0 0 0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0149 -0.0147 220 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0173 -0.0169 221 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0337 +1.0341 1 3 1 3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0001 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0019 -0.0019 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0021 -0.0021 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4441 -0.4282 0 0 0 0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.4263 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0258 -0.0006 81 83 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0235 -0.0011 81 82 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1634 +0.1070 1 1 0 0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.
llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779
llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-28 04:46:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-LABEL: f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2: # %bb.0:
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmovss {{.*#+}} xmm2 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vrcpss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [2:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulss %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [2:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vsubss %xmm0, %xmm2, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulss %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [2:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vaddss %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [7:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulss %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [2:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-LABEL: f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY: # %bb.0:
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vrcpss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulss %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target.
The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information.
Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB.
Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX.
The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details:
•static latency of the instruction
•number of uOps from which the instruction consists of
•all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs
For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5:
def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> {
let Latency = 9;
let NumMicroOps = 6;
let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1];
}
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>;
Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script.
Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691
llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmovss {{.*#+}} xmm2 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero sched: [6:0.50]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vsubss %xmm0, %xmm2, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulss %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vaddss %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target.
The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information.
Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB.
Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX.
The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details:
•static latency of the instruction
•number of uOps from which the instruction consists of
•all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs
For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5:
def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> {
let Latency = 9;
let NumMicroOps = 6;
let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1];
}
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>;
Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script.
Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691
llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [11:1.00]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulss %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target.
The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information.
Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB.
Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX.
The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details:
•static latency of the instruction
•number of uOps from which the instruction consists of
•all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs
For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5:
def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> {
let Latency = 9;
let NumMicroOps = 6;
let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1];
}
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>;
Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script.
Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691
llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-LABEL: f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL: # %bb.0:
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vrcpss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-03-11 05:30:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfnmadd213ss {{.*#+}} xmm0 = -(xmm1 * xmm0) + mem sched: [10:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfmadd132ss {{.*#+}} xmm0 = (xmm0 * xmm1) + xmm1 sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vmulss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [10:0.50]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vmulss %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-LABEL: f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA: # %bb.0:
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vrcpss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulss %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmovss {{.*#+}} xmm2 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vsubss %xmm0, %xmm2, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulss %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vaddss %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [10:0.50]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulss %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2017-09-19 14:19:27 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-LABEL: f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL: # %bb.0:
|
2017-11-06 05:14:05 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vrcpss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-03-11 05:30:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vfnmadd213ss {{.*#+}} xmm0 = -(xmm1 * xmm0) + mem sched: [10:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vfmadd132ss {{.*#+}} xmm0 = (xmm0 * xmm1) + xmm1 sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vmulss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [10:0.50]
|
2017-09-19 14:19:27 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vmulss %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2017-09-19 14:19:27 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SKX-LABEL: f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX: # %bb.0:
|
2017-11-06 05:14:05 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vrcpss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [4:1.00]
|
2018-03-11 05:30:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vfnmadd213ss {{.*#+}} xmm0 = -(xmm1 * xmm0) + mem sched: [9:0.50]
|
2018-06-11 22:37:53 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vfmadd132ss {{.*#+}} xmm0 = (xmm0 * xmm1) + xmm1 sched: [4:0.50]
|
2017-10-08 20:52:54 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vmulss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [9:0.50]
|
2018-06-11 22:37:53 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vmulss %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [4:0.50]
|
2017-10-08 20:52:54 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
%div = fdiv fast float 3456.0, %x
|
|
|
|
%div2 = fdiv fast float %div, %x
|
|
|
|
ret float %div2
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-16 17:56:02 +08:00
|
|
|
define float @f32_two_step_2(float %x) #2 {
|
|
|
|
; SSE-LABEL: f32_two_step_2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE: # %bb.0:
|
2016-12-16 17:56:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: rcpss %xmm0, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm0, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulss %xmm2, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movss {{.*#+}} xmm1 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm1, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: subss %xmm3, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulss %xmm2, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: addss %xmm2, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulss %xmm4, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: subss %xmm0, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulss %xmm4, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: addss %xmm4, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-LABEL: f32_two_step_2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP: # %bb.0:
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulss %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmovss {{.*#+}} xmm3 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vsubss %xmm2, %xmm3, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulss %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vaddss %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulss %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vsubss %xmm0, %xmm3, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulss %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vaddss %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-LABEL: f32_two_step_2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP: # %bb.0:
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vmovss {{.*#+}} xmm2 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vmovaps %xmm1, %xmm3
|
2018-03-11 05:30:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfnmadd213ss {{.*#+}} xmm3 = -(xmm0 * xmm3) + xmm2
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfmadd132ss {{.*#+}} xmm3 = (xmm3 * xmm1) + xmm1
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfnmadd213ss {{.*#+}} xmm0 = -(xmm3 * xmm0) + xmm2
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfmadd132ss {{.*#+}} xmm0 = (xmm0 * xmm3) + xmm3
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vmulss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-LABEL: f32_two_step_2:
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2: # %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vrcpss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
* All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
* Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...
To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!
# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark Time CPU Time Old Time New CPU Old CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0607 -0.0604 234 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0630 -0.0626 233 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2581 +0.2587 1 2 1 2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0770 -0.0767 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0767 -0.0763 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4170 -0.4156 1 0 1 0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0271 -0.0270 463 450 463 450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0093 -0.0093 453 449 453 449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7280 -0.7280 13 4 13 4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0065 -0.0065 569 565 569 565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0077 -0.0077 569 564 569 564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0077 +1.0068 2 5 2 5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0220 0.0199 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0006 +0.0007 312 312 312 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0031 +0.0032 311 312 311 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7069 -0.7072 4 1 4 1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0015 -0.0015 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0010 -0.0011 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1486 -0.1456 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6139 0.8766 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0008 -0.0005 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0006 -0.0002 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1467 -0.1390 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0137 0.0137 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0002 +0.0002 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0015 -0.0014 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +3.3687 +3.3587 0 2 0 2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.4041 0.3933 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0004 +0.0004 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0000 -0.0000 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1947 +0.1995 0 0 0 0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0074 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0092 +0.0074 547 542 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0054 +0.0115 544 541 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4086 -0.3486 8 5 0 0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.3320 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0015 +0.0204 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0001 +0.0203 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2259 +0.2023 1 1 0 0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0209 -0.0179 96 94 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0182 -0.0155 95 93 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.6164 -0.2703 2 1 2 1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0098 -0.0098 176 175 176 175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0126 -0.0126 176 174 176 174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev +6.9789 +6.9157 0 2 0 2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0237 -0.0238 474 463 474 463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0267 -0.0267 473 461 473 461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.7179 +0.7178 3 5 3 5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6837 0.6554 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0014 -0.0013 1375 1373 1375 1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0018 +0.0019 1371 1374 1371 1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7457 -0.7382 11 3 10 3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0080 -0.0289 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0070 -0.0287 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0977 +0.6614 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0132 +0.0967 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0132 +0.0956 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0407 -0.1695 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0331 +0.1307 13 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0430 +0.1373 12 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.9006 -0.8847 1 0 0 0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0016 0.0010 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0023 -0.0024 395 394 395 394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0029 -0.0030 395 394 395 393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0275 -0.0375 1 1 1 1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0232 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0047 +0.0039 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0050 +0.0037 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0599 -0.2683 1 1 0 0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0206 +0.0207 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0204 +0.0205 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2155 +0.2212 1 1 1 1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0109 -0.0108 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0104 -0.0103 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4919 -0.4800 0 0 0 0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0149 -0.0147 220 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0173 -0.0169 221 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0337 +1.0341 1 3 1 3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0001 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0019 -0.0019 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0021 -0.0021 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4441 -0.4282 0 0 0 0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.4263 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0258 -0.0006 81 83 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0235 -0.0011 81 82 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1634 +0.1070 1 1 0 0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.
llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779
llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-28 04:46:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vmovss {{.*#+}} xmm2 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero sched: [5:0.50]
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfnmaddss %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm3 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfmaddss %xmm1, %xmm3, %xmm1, %xmm1 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfnmaddss %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfmaddss %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
* All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
* Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...
To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!
# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark Time CPU Time Old Time New CPU Old CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0607 -0.0604 234 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0630 -0.0626 233 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2581 +0.2587 1 2 1 2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0770 -0.0767 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0767 -0.0763 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4170 -0.4156 1 0 1 0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0271 -0.0270 463 450 463 450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0093 -0.0093 453 449 453 449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7280 -0.7280 13 4 13 4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0065 -0.0065 569 565 569 565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0077 -0.0077 569 564 569 564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0077 +1.0068 2 5 2 5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0220 0.0199 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0006 +0.0007 312 312 312 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0031 +0.0032 311 312 311 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7069 -0.7072 4 1 4 1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0015 -0.0015 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0010 -0.0011 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1486 -0.1456 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6139 0.8766 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0008 -0.0005 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0006 -0.0002 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1467 -0.1390 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0137 0.0137 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0002 +0.0002 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0015 -0.0014 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +3.3687 +3.3587 0 2 0 2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.4041 0.3933 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0004 +0.0004 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0000 -0.0000 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1947 +0.1995 0 0 0 0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0074 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0092 +0.0074 547 542 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0054 +0.0115 544 541 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4086 -0.3486 8 5 0 0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.3320 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0015 +0.0204 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0001 +0.0203 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2259 +0.2023 1 1 0 0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0209 -0.0179 96 94 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0182 -0.0155 95 93 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.6164 -0.2703 2 1 2 1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0098 -0.0098 176 175 176 175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0126 -0.0126 176 174 176 174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev +6.9789 +6.9157 0 2 0 2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0237 -0.0238 474 463 474 463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0267 -0.0267 473 461 473 461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.7179 +0.7178 3 5 3 5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6837 0.6554 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0014 -0.0013 1375 1373 1375 1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0018 +0.0019 1371 1374 1371 1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7457 -0.7382 11 3 10 3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0080 -0.0289 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0070 -0.0287 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0977 +0.6614 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0132 +0.0967 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0132 +0.0956 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0407 -0.1695 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0331 +0.1307 13 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0430 +0.1373 12 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.9006 -0.8847 1 0 0 0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0016 0.0010 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0023 -0.0024 395 394 395 394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0029 -0.0030 395 394 395 393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0275 -0.0375 1 1 1 1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0232 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0047 +0.0039 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0050 +0.0037 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0599 -0.2683 1 1 0 0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0206 +0.0207 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0204 +0.0205 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2155 +0.2212 1 1 1 1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0109 -0.0108 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0104 -0.0103 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4919 -0.4800 0 0 0 0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0149 -0.0147 220 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0173 -0.0169 221 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0337 +1.0341 1 3 1 3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0001 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0019 -0.0019 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0021 -0.0021 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4441 -0.4282 0 0 0 0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.4263 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0258 -0.0006 81 83 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0235 -0.0011 81 82 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1634 +0.1070 1 1 0 0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.
llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779
llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-28 04:46:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vmulss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [10:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-LABEL: f32_two_step_2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2: # %bb.0:
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmovss {{.*#+}} xmm3 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vrcpss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [2:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulss %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm2 # sched: [2:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vsubss %xmm2, %xmm3, %xmm2 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulss %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm2 # sched: [2:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vaddss %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm1 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulss %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [2:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vsubss %xmm0, %xmm3, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulss %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [2:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vaddss %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [7:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-LABEL: f32_two_step_2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY: # %bb.0:
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vrcpss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulss %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm2 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target.
The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information.
Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB.
Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX.
The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details:
•static latency of the instruction
•number of uOps from which the instruction consists of
•all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs
For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5:
def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> {
let Latency = 9;
let NumMicroOps = 6;
let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1];
}
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>;
Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script.
Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691
llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmovss {{.*#+}} xmm3 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero sched: [6:0.50]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vsubss %xmm2, %xmm3, %xmm2 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulss %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm2 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vaddss %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm1 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulss %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vsubss %xmm0, %xmm3, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulss %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vaddss %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target.
The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information.
Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB.
Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX.
The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details:
•static latency of the instruction
•number of uOps from which the instruction consists of
•all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs
For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5:
def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> {
let Latency = 9;
let NumMicroOps = 6;
let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1];
}
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>;
Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script.
Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691
llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [11:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-LABEL: f32_two_step_2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL: # %bb.0:
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vrcpss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vmovss {{.*#+}} xmm2 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vmovaps %xmm1, %xmm3 # sched: [1:1.00]
|
2018-03-11 05:30:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfnmadd213ss {{.*#+}} xmm3 = -(xmm0 * xmm3) + xmm2 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfmadd132ss {{.*#+}} xmm3 = (xmm3 * xmm1) + xmm1 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfnmadd213ss {{.*#+}} xmm0 = -(xmm3 * xmm0) + xmm2 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfmadd132ss {{.*#+}} xmm0 = (xmm0 * xmm3) + xmm3 sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vmulss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [10:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-LABEL: f32_two_step_2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA: # %bb.0:
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vrcpss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulss %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm2 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmovss {{.*#+}} xmm3 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vsubss %xmm2, %xmm3, %xmm2 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulss %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm2 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vaddss %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm1 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulss %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vsubss %xmm0, %xmm3, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulss %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vaddss %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [10:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2017-09-19 14:19:27 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-LABEL: f32_two_step_2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL: # %bb.0:
|
2017-11-06 05:14:05 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vrcpss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vmovss {{.*#+}} xmm2 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-09-19 14:19:27 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vmovaps %xmm1, %xmm3 # sched: [1:1.00]
|
2018-03-11 05:30:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vfnmadd213ss {{.*#+}} xmm3 = -(xmm0 * xmm3) + xmm2 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vfmadd132ss {{.*#+}} xmm3 = (xmm3 * xmm1) + xmm1 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vfnmadd213ss {{.*#+}} xmm0 = -(xmm3 * xmm0) + xmm2 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vfmadd132ss {{.*#+}} xmm0 = (xmm0 * xmm3) + xmm3 sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vmulss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [10:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2017-09-19 14:19:27 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SKX-LABEL: f32_two_step_2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX: # %bb.0:
|
2017-12-10 11:16:38 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vrcpss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [4:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vmovss {{.*#+}} xmm2 = mem[0],zero,zero,zero sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vmovaps %xmm1, %xmm3 # sched: [1:0.33]
|
2018-06-11 22:37:53 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vfnmadd213ss {{.*#+}} xmm3 = -(xmm0 * xmm3) + xmm2 sched: [4:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vfmadd132ss {{.*#+}} xmm3 = (xmm3 * xmm1) + xmm1 sched: [4:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vfnmadd213ss {{.*#+}} xmm0 = -(xmm3 * xmm0) + xmm2 sched: [4:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vfmadd132ss {{.*#+}} xmm0 = (xmm0 * xmm3) + xmm3 sched: [4:0.50]
|
2017-10-08 20:52:54 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vmulss {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [9:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2016-12-16 17:56:02 +08:00
|
|
|
%div = fdiv fast float 6789.0, %x
|
|
|
|
ret float %div
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define <4 x float> @v4f32_one_step2(<4 x float> %x) #1 {
|
|
|
|
; SSE-LABEL: v4f32_one_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE: # %bb.0:
|
2016-12-16 17:56:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: rcpps %xmm0, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm2, %xmm0
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps {{.*#+}} xmm1 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0]
|
2016-12-16 17:56:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: subps %xmm0, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm2, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: addps %xmm2, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-LABEL: v4f32_one_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP: # %bb.0:
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpps %xmm0, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmovaps {{.*#+}} xmm2 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0]
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vsubps %xmm0, %xmm2, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vaddps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-LABEL: v4f32_one_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP: # %bb.0:
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpps %xmm0, %xmm1
|
2018-03-11 05:30:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = -(xmm1 * xmm0) + mem
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = (xmm0 * xmm1) + xmm1
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-LABEL: v4f32_one_step2:
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2: # %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vrcpps %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfnmaddps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [10:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfmaddps %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
* All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
* Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...
To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!
# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark Time CPU Time Old Time New CPU Old CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0607 -0.0604 234 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0630 -0.0626 233 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2581 +0.2587 1 2 1 2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0770 -0.0767 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0767 -0.0763 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4170 -0.4156 1 0 1 0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0271 -0.0270 463 450 463 450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0093 -0.0093 453 449 453 449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7280 -0.7280 13 4 13 4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0065 -0.0065 569 565 569 565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0077 -0.0077 569 564 569 564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0077 +1.0068 2 5 2 5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0220 0.0199 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0006 +0.0007 312 312 312 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0031 +0.0032 311 312 311 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7069 -0.7072 4 1 4 1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0015 -0.0015 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0010 -0.0011 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1486 -0.1456 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6139 0.8766 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0008 -0.0005 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0006 -0.0002 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1467 -0.1390 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0137 0.0137 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0002 +0.0002 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0015 -0.0014 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +3.3687 +3.3587 0 2 0 2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.4041 0.3933 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0004 +0.0004 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0000 -0.0000 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1947 +0.1995 0 0 0 0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0074 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0092 +0.0074 547 542 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0054 +0.0115 544 541 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4086 -0.3486 8 5 0 0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.3320 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0015 +0.0204 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0001 +0.0203 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2259 +0.2023 1 1 0 0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0209 -0.0179 96 94 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0182 -0.0155 95 93 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.6164 -0.2703 2 1 2 1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0098 -0.0098 176 175 176 175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0126 -0.0126 176 174 176 174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev +6.9789 +6.9157 0 2 0 2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0237 -0.0238 474 463 474 463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0267 -0.0267 473 461 473 461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.7179 +0.7178 3 5 3 5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6837 0.6554 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0014 -0.0013 1375 1373 1375 1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0018 +0.0019 1371 1374 1371 1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7457 -0.7382 11 3 10 3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0080 -0.0289 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0070 -0.0287 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0977 +0.6614 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0132 +0.0967 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0132 +0.0956 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0407 -0.1695 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0331 +0.1307 13 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0430 +0.1373 12 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.9006 -0.8847 1 0 0 0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0016 0.0010 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0023 -0.0024 395 394 395 394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0029 -0.0030 395 394 395 393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0275 -0.0375 1 1 1 1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0232 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0047 +0.0039 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0050 +0.0037 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0599 -0.2683 1 1 0 0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0206 +0.0207 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0204 +0.0205 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2155 +0.2212 1 1 1 1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0109 -0.0108 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0104 -0.0103 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4919 -0.4800 0 0 0 0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0149 -0.0147 220 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0173 -0.0169 221 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0337 +1.0341 1 3 1 3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0001 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0019 -0.0019 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0021 -0.0021 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4441 -0.4282 0 0 0 0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.4263 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0258 -0.0006 81 83 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0235 -0.0011 81 82 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1634 +0.1070 1 1 0 0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.
llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779
llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-28 04:46:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [10:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-LABEL: v4f32_one_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2: # %bb.0:
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmovaps {{.*#+}} xmm2 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [5:1.00]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vrcpps %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [2:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [2:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vsubps %xmm0, %xmm2, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [2:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vaddps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [7:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-LABEL: v4f32_one_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY: # %bb.0:
|
2017-08-13 21:59:24 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vrcpps %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmovaps {{.*#+}} xmm2 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [6:0.50]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vsubps %xmm0, %xmm2, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vaddps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target.
The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information.
Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB.
Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX.
The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details:
•static latency of the instruction
•number of uOps from which the instruction consists of
•all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs
For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5:
def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> {
let Latency = 9;
let NumMicroOps = 6;
let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1];
}
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>;
Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script.
Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691
llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [11:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-LABEL: v4f32_one_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL: # %bb.0:
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vrcpps %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vbroadcastss {{.*#+}} xmm2 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [6:0.50]
|
2018-03-11 05:30:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = -(xmm1 * xmm0) + xmm2 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = (xmm0 * xmm1) + xmm1 sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [11:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-LABEL: v4f32_one_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA: # %bb.0:
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vrcpps %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vbroadcastss {{.*#+}} xmm2 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [6:0.50]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vsubps %xmm0, %xmm2, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vaddps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [11:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-LABEL: v4f32_one_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL: # %bb.0:
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vrcpps %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vbroadcastss {{.*#+}} xmm2 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [6:0.50]
|
2018-03-11 05:30:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = -(xmm1 * xmm0) + xmm2 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = (xmm0 * xmm1) + xmm1 sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [11:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SKX-LABEL: v4f32_one_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX: # %bb.0:
|
2017-11-05 02:26:41 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vrcpps %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [4:1.00]
|
2018-03-11 05:30:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = -(xmm1 * xmm0) + mem sched: [10:0.50]
|
2018-06-11 22:37:53 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = (xmm0 * xmm1) + xmm1 sched: [4:0.50]
|
2017-10-08 20:52:54 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [10:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2016-12-16 17:56:02 +08:00
|
|
|
%div = fdiv fast <4 x float> <float 1.0, float 2.0, float 3.0, float 4.0>, %x
|
|
|
|
ret <4 x float> %div
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
define <4 x float> @v4f32_one_step_2_divs(<4 x float> %x) #1 {
|
|
|
|
; SSE-LABEL: v4f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE: # %bb.0:
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: rcpps %xmm0, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm1, %xmm0
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps {{.*#+}} xmm2 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0]
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: subps %xmm0, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm1, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: addps %xmm1, %xmm2
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = [1.0E+0,2.0E+0,3.0E+0,4.0E+0]
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm2, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm2, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-LABEL: v4f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP: # %bb.0:
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpps %xmm0, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmovaps {{.*#+}} xmm2 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0]
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vsubps %xmm0, %xmm2, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vaddps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-LABEL: v4f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP: # %bb.0:
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpps %xmm0, %xmm1
|
2018-03-11 05:30:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = -(xmm1 * xmm0) + mem
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = (xmm0 * xmm1) + xmm1
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-LABEL: v4f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2: # %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vrcpps %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfnmaddps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [10:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfmaddps %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
* All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
* Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...
To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!
# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark Time CPU Time Old Time New CPU Old CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0607 -0.0604 234 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0630 -0.0626 233 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2581 +0.2587 1 2 1 2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0770 -0.0767 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0767 -0.0763 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4170 -0.4156 1 0 1 0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0271 -0.0270 463 450 463 450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0093 -0.0093 453 449 453 449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7280 -0.7280 13 4 13 4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0065 -0.0065 569 565 569 565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0077 -0.0077 569 564 569 564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0077 +1.0068 2 5 2 5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0220 0.0199 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0006 +0.0007 312 312 312 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0031 +0.0032 311 312 311 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7069 -0.7072 4 1 4 1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0015 -0.0015 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0010 -0.0011 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1486 -0.1456 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6139 0.8766 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0008 -0.0005 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0006 -0.0002 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1467 -0.1390 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0137 0.0137 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0002 +0.0002 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0015 -0.0014 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +3.3687 +3.3587 0 2 0 2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.4041 0.3933 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0004 +0.0004 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0000 -0.0000 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1947 +0.1995 0 0 0 0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0074 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0092 +0.0074 547 542 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0054 +0.0115 544 541 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4086 -0.3486 8 5 0 0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.3320 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0015 +0.0204 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0001 +0.0203 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2259 +0.2023 1 1 0 0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0209 -0.0179 96 94 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0182 -0.0155 95 93 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.6164 -0.2703 2 1 2 1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0098 -0.0098 176 175 176 175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0126 -0.0126 176 174 176 174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev +6.9789 +6.9157 0 2 0 2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0237 -0.0238 474 463 474 463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0267 -0.0267 473 461 473 461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.7179 +0.7178 3 5 3 5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6837 0.6554 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0014 -0.0013 1375 1373 1375 1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0018 +0.0019 1371 1374 1371 1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7457 -0.7382 11 3 10 3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0080 -0.0289 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0070 -0.0287 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0977 +0.6614 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0132 +0.0967 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0132 +0.0956 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0407 -0.1695 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0331 +0.1307 13 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0430 +0.1373 12 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.9006 -0.8847 1 0 0 0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0016 0.0010 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0023 -0.0024 395 394 395 394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0029 -0.0030 395 394 395 393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0275 -0.0375 1 1 1 1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0232 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0047 +0.0039 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0050 +0.0037 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0599 -0.2683 1 1 0 0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0206 +0.0207 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0204 +0.0205 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2155 +0.2212 1 1 1 1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0109 -0.0108 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0104 -0.0103 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4919 -0.4800 0 0 0 0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0149 -0.0147 220 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0173 -0.0169 221 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0337 +1.0341 1 3 1 3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0001 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0019 -0.0019 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0021 -0.0021 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4441 -0.4282 0 0 0 0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.4263 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0258 -0.0006 81 83 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0235 -0.0011 81 82 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1634 +0.1070 1 1 0 0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.
llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779
llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-28 04:46:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [10:1.00]
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vmulps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
* All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
* Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...
To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!
# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark Time CPU Time Old Time New CPU Old CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0607 -0.0604 234 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0630 -0.0626 233 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2581 +0.2587 1 2 1 2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0770 -0.0767 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0767 -0.0763 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4170 -0.4156 1 0 1 0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0271 -0.0270 463 450 463 450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0093 -0.0093 453 449 453 449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7280 -0.7280 13 4 13 4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0065 -0.0065 569 565 569 565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0077 -0.0077 569 564 569 564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0077 +1.0068 2 5 2 5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0220 0.0199 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0006 +0.0007 312 312 312 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0031 +0.0032 311 312 311 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7069 -0.7072 4 1 4 1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0015 -0.0015 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0010 -0.0011 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1486 -0.1456 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6139 0.8766 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0008 -0.0005 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0006 -0.0002 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1467 -0.1390 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0137 0.0137 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0002 +0.0002 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0015 -0.0014 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +3.3687 +3.3587 0 2 0 2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.4041 0.3933 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0004 +0.0004 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0000 -0.0000 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1947 +0.1995 0 0 0 0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0074 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0092 +0.0074 547 542 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0054 +0.0115 544 541 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4086 -0.3486 8 5 0 0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.3320 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0015 +0.0204 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0001 +0.0203 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2259 +0.2023 1 1 0 0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0209 -0.0179 96 94 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0182 -0.0155 95 93 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.6164 -0.2703 2 1 2 1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0098 -0.0098 176 175 176 175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0126 -0.0126 176 174 176 174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev +6.9789 +6.9157 0 2 0 2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0237 -0.0238 474 463 474 463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0267 -0.0267 473 461 473 461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.7179 +0.7178 3 5 3 5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6837 0.6554 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0014 -0.0013 1375 1373 1375 1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0018 +0.0019 1371 1374 1371 1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7457 -0.7382 11 3 10 3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0080 -0.0289 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0070 -0.0287 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0977 +0.6614 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0132 +0.0967 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0132 +0.0956 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0407 -0.1695 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0331 +0.1307 13 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0430 +0.1373 12 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.9006 -0.8847 1 0 0 0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0016 0.0010 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0023 -0.0024 395 394 395 394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0029 -0.0030 395 394 395 393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0275 -0.0375 1 1 1 1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0232 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0047 +0.0039 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0050 +0.0037 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0599 -0.2683 1 1 0 0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0206 +0.0207 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0204 +0.0205 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2155 +0.2212 1 1 1 1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0109 -0.0108 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0104 -0.0103 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4919 -0.4800 0 0 0 0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0149 -0.0147 220 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0173 -0.0169 221 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0337 +1.0341 1 3 1 3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0001 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0019 -0.0019 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0021 -0.0021 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4441 -0.4282 0 0 0 0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.4263 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0258 -0.0006 81 83 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0235 -0.0011 81 82 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1634 +0.1070 1 1 0 0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.
llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779
llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-28 04:46:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-LABEL: v4f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2: # %bb.0:
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmovaps {{.*#+}} xmm2 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [5:1.00]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vrcpps %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [2:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [2:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vsubps %xmm0, %xmm2, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [2:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vaddps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [7:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [2:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-LABEL: v4f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY: # %bb.0:
|
2017-08-13 21:59:24 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vrcpps %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmovaps {{.*#+}} xmm2 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [6:0.50]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vsubps %xmm0, %xmm2, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vaddps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target.
The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information.
Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB.
Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX.
The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details:
•static latency of the instruction
•number of uOps from which the instruction consists of
•all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs
For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5:
def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> {
let Latency = 9;
let NumMicroOps = 6;
let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1];
}
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>;
Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script.
Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691
llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [11:1.00]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target.
The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information.
Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB.
Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX.
The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details:
•static latency of the instruction
•number of uOps from which the instruction consists of
•all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs
For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5:
def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> {
let Latency = 9;
let NumMicroOps = 6;
let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1];
}
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>;
Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script.
Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691
llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-LABEL: v4f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL: # %bb.0:
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vrcpps %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vbroadcastss {{.*#+}} xmm2 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [6:0.50]
|
2018-03-11 05:30:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = -(xmm1 * xmm0) + xmm2 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = (xmm0 * xmm1) + xmm1 sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [11:0.50]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vmulps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-LABEL: v4f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA: # %bb.0:
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vrcpps %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vbroadcastss {{.*#+}} xmm2 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [6:0.50]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vsubps %xmm0, %xmm2, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vaddps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [11:0.50]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; KNL-LABEL: v4f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL: # %bb.0:
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vrcpps %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vbroadcastss {{.*#+}} xmm2 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [6:0.50]
|
2018-03-11 05:30:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = -(xmm1 * xmm0) + xmm2 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = (xmm0 * xmm1) + xmm1 sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [11:0.50]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vmulps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SKX-LABEL: v4f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX: # %bb.0:
|
2017-11-05 02:26:41 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vrcpps %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [4:1.00]
|
2018-03-11 05:30:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = -(xmm1 * xmm0) + mem sched: [10:0.50]
|
2018-06-11 22:37:53 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = (xmm0 * xmm1) + xmm1 sched: [4:0.50]
|
2017-10-08 20:52:54 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [10:0.50]
|
2018-06-11 22:37:53 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vmulps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [4:0.50]
|
2017-10-08 20:52:54 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
%div = fdiv fast <4 x float> <float 1.0, float 2.0, float 3.0, float 4.0>, %x
|
|
|
|
%div2 = fdiv fast <4 x float> %div, %x
|
|
|
|
ret <4 x float> %div2
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-16 17:56:02 +08:00
|
|
|
define <4 x float> @v4f32_two_step2(<4 x float> %x) #2 {
|
|
|
|
; SSE-LABEL: v4f32_two_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE: # %bb.0:
|
2016-12-16 17:56:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: rcpps %xmm0, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm0, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm2, %xmm3
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps {{.*#+}} xmm1 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0]
|
2016-12-16 17:56:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm1, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: subps %xmm3, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm2, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: addps %xmm2, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm4, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: subps %xmm0, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm4, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: addps %xmm4, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-LABEL: v4f32_two_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP: # %bb.0:
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpps %xmm0, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm2
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmovaps {{.*#+}} xmm3 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0]
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vsubps %xmm2, %xmm3, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vaddps %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vsubps %xmm0, %xmm3, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vaddps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-LABEL: v4f32_two_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP: # %bb.0:
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpps %xmm0, %xmm1
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vmovaps {{.*#+}} xmm2 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0]
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vmovaps %xmm1, %xmm3
|
2018-03-11 05:30:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} xmm3 = -(xmm0 * xmm3) + xmm2
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} xmm3 = (xmm3 * xmm1) + xmm1
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = -(xmm3 * xmm0) + xmm2
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = (xmm0 * xmm3) + xmm3
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-LABEL: v4f32_two_step2:
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2: # %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vrcpps %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vmovaps {{.*#+}} xmm2 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [5:0.50]
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfnmaddps %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm3 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfmaddps %xmm1, %xmm3, %xmm1, %xmm1 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfnmaddps %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfmaddps %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
* All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
* Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...
To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!
# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark Time CPU Time Old Time New CPU Old CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0607 -0.0604 234 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0630 -0.0626 233 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2581 +0.2587 1 2 1 2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0770 -0.0767 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0767 -0.0763 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4170 -0.4156 1 0 1 0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0271 -0.0270 463 450 463 450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0093 -0.0093 453 449 453 449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7280 -0.7280 13 4 13 4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0065 -0.0065 569 565 569 565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0077 -0.0077 569 564 569 564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0077 +1.0068 2 5 2 5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0220 0.0199 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0006 +0.0007 312 312 312 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0031 +0.0032 311 312 311 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7069 -0.7072 4 1 4 1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0015 -0.0015 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0010 -0.0011 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1486 -0.1456 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6139 0.8766 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0008 -0.0005 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0006 -0.0002 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1467 -0.1390 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0137 0.0137 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0002 +0.0002 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0015 -0.0014 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +3.3687 +3.3587 0 2 0 2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.4041 0.3933 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0004 +0.0004 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0000 -0.0000 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1947 +0.1995 0 0 0 0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0074 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0092 +0.0074 547 542 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0054 +0.0115 544 541 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4086 -0.3486 8 5 0 0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.3320 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0015 +0.0204 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0001 +0.0203 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2259 +0.2023 1 1 0 0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0209 -0.0179 96 94 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0182 -0.0155 95 93 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.6164 -0.2703 2 1 2 1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0098 -0.0098 176 175 176 175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0126 -0.0126 176 174 176 174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev +6.9789 +6.9157 0 2 0 2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0237 -0.0238 474 463 474 463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0267 -0.0267 473 461 473 461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.7179 +0.7178 3 5 3 5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6837 0.6554 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0014 -0.0013 1375 1373 1375 1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0018 +0.0019 1371 1374 1371 1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7457 -0.7382 11 3 10 3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0080 -0.0289 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0070 -0.0287 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0977 +0.6614 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0132 +0.0967 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0132 +0.0956 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0407 -0.1695 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0331 +0.1307 13 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0430 +0.1373 12 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.9006 -0.8847 1 0 0 0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0016 0.0010 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0023 -0.0024 395 394 395 394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0029 -0.0030 395 394 395 393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0275 -0.0375 1 1 1 1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0232 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0047 +0.0039 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0050 +0.0037 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0599 -0.2683 1 1 0 0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0206 +0.0207 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0204 +0.0205 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2155 +0.2212 1 1 1 1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0109 -0.0108 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0104 -0.0103 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4919 -0.4800 0 0 0 0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0149 -0.0147 220 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0173 -0.0169 221 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0337 +1.0341 1 3 1 3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0001 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0019 -0.0019 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0021 -0.0021 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4441 -0.4282 0 0 0 0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.4263 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0258 -0.0006 81 83 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0235 -0.0011 81 82 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1634 +0.1070 1 1 0 0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.
llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779
llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-28 04:46:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [10:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-LABEL: v4f32_two_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2: # %bb.0:
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmovaps {{.*#+}} xmm3 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [5:1.00]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vrcpps %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [2:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm2 # sched: [2:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vsubps %xmm2, %xmm3, %xmm2 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm2 # sched: [2:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vaddps %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm1 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [2:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vsubps %xmm0, %xmm3, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [2:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vaddps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [7:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-LABEL: v4f32_two_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY: # %bb.0:
|
2017-08-13 21:59:24 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vrcpps %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm2 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmovaps {{.*#+}} xmm3 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [6:0.50]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vsubps %xmm2, %xmm3, %xmm2 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm2 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vaddps %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm1 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vsubps %xmm0, %xmm3, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vaddps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target.
The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information.
Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB.
Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX.
The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details:
•static latency of the instruction
•number of uOps from which the instruction consists of
•all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs
For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5:
def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> {
let Latency = 9;
let NumMicroOps = 6;
let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1];
}
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>;
Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script.
Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691
llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [11:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-LABEL: v4f32_two_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL: # %bb.0:
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vrcpps %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vbroadcastss {{.*#+}} xmm2 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [6:0.50]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vmovaps %xmm1, %xmm3 # sched: [1:1.00]
|
2018-03-11 05:30:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} xmm3 = -(xmm0 * xmm3) + xmm2 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} xmm3 = (xmm3 * xmm1) + xmm1 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = -(xmm3 * xmm0) + xmm2 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = (xmm0 * xmm3) + xmm3 sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [11:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-LABEL: v4f32_two_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA: # %bb.0:
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vrcpps %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm2 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vbroadcastss {{.*#+}} xmm3 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [6:0.50]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vsubps %xmm2, %xmm3, %xmm2 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm2 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vaddps %xmm2, %xmm1, %xmm1 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vsubps %xmm0, %xmm3, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vaddps %xmm0, %xmm1, %xmm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [11:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-LABEL: v4f32_two_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL: # %bb.0:
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vrcpps %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vbroadcastss {{.*#+}} xmm2 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [6:0.50]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vmovaps %xmm1, %xmm3 # sched: [1:1.00]
|
2018-03-11 05:30:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} xmm3 = -(xmm0 * xmm3) + xmm2 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} xmm3 = (xmm3 * xmm1) + xmm1 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = -(xmm3 * xmm0) + xmm2 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = (xmm0 * xmm3) + xmm3 sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [11:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SKX-LABEL: v4f32_two_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX: # %bb.0:
|
2017-11-05 02:26:41 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vrcpps %xmm0, %xmm1 # sched: [4:1.00]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vbroadcastss {{.*#+}} xmm2 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [6:0.50]
|
2017-12-10 09:24:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vmovaps %xmm1, %xmm3 # sched: [1:0.33]
|
2018-06-11 22:37:53 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} xmm3 = -(xmm0 * xmm3) + xmm2 sched: [4:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} xmm3 = (xmm3 * xmm1) + xmm1 sched: [4:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = -(xmm3 * xmm0) + xmm2 sched: [4:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = (xmm0 * xmm3) + xmm3 sched: [4:0.50]
|
2017-10-08 20:52:54 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0, %xmm0 # sched: [10:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2016-12-16 17:56:02 +08:00
|
|
|
%div = fdiv fast <4 x float> <float 1.0, float 2.0, float 3.0, float 4.0>, %x
|
|
|
|
ret <4 x float> %div
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define <8 x float> @v8f32_one_step2(<8 x float> %x) #1 {
|
|
|
|
; SSE-LABEL: v8f32_one_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE: # %bb.0:
|
2016-12-16 17:56:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: rcpps %xmm1, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm4, %xmm1
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps {{.*#+}} xmm2 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0]
|
2016-12-16 17:56:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm2, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: subps %xmm1, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm4, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: addps %xmm4, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: rcpps %xmm0, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: subps %xmm0, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm1, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: addps %xmm1, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm2, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm3, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-LABEL: v8f32_one_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP: # %bb.0:
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmovaps {{.*#+}} ymm2 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0]
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vsubps %ymm0, %ymm2, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vaddps %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-LABEL: v8f32_one_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP: # %bb.0:
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm1
|
2018-03-11 05:30:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} ymm0 = -(ymm1 * ymm0) + mem
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} ymm0 = (ymm0 * ymm1) + ymm1
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-LABEL: v8f32_one_step2:
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2: # %bb.0:
|
AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
* All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
* Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...
To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!
# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark Time CPU Time Old Time New CPU Old CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0607 -0.0604 234 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0630 -0.0626 233 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2581 +0.2587 1 2 1 2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0770 -0.0767 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0767 -0.0763 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4170 -0.4156 1 0 1 0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0271 -0.0270 463 450 463 450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0093 -0.0093 453 449 453 449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7280 -0.7280 13 4 13 4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0065 -0.0065 569 565 569 565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0077 -0.0077 569 564 569 564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0077 +1.0068 2 5 2 5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0220 0.0199 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0006 +0.0007 312 312 312 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0031 +0.0032 311 312 311 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7069 -0.7072 4 1 4 1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0015 -0.0015 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0010 -0.0011 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1486 -0.1456 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6139 0.8766 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0008 -0.0005 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0006 -0.0002 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1467 -0.1390 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0137 0.0137 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0002 +0.0002 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0015 -0.0014 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +3.3687 +3.3587 0 2 0 2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.4041 0.3933 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0004 +0.0004 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0000 -0.0000 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1947 +0.1995 0 0 0 0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0074 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0092 +0.0074 547 542 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0054 +0.0115 544 541 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4086 -0.3486 8 5 0 0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.3320 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0015 +0.0204 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0001 +0.0203 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2259 +0.2023 1 1 0 0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0209 -0.0179 96 94 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0182 -0.0155 95 93 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.6164 -0.2703 2 1 2 1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0098 -0.0098 176 175 176 175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0126 -0.0126 176 174 176 174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev +6.9789 +6.9157 0 2 0 2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0237 -0.0238 474 463 474 463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0267 -0.0267 473 461 473 461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.7179 +0.7178 3 5 3 5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6837 0.6554 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0014 -0.0013 1375 1373 1375 1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0018 +0.0019 1371 1374 1371 1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7457 -0.7382 11 3 10 3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0080 -0.0289 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0070 -0.0287 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0977 +0.6614 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0132 +0.0967 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0132 +0.0956 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0407 -0.1695 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0331 +0.1307 13 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0430 +0.1373 12 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.9006 -0.8847 1 0 0 0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0016 0.0010 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0023 -0.0024 395 394 395 394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0029 -0.0030 395 394 395 393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0275 -0.0375 1 1 1 1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0232 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0047 +0.0039 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0050 +0.0037 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0599 -0.2683 1 1 0 0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0206 +0.0207 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0204 +0.0205 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2155 +0.2212 1 1 1 1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0109 -0.0108 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0104 -0.0103 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4919 -0.4800 0 0 0 0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0149 -0.0147 220 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0173 -0.0169 221 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0337 +1.0341 1 3 1 3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0001 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0019 -0.0019 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0021 -0.0021 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4441 -0.4282 0 0 0 0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.4263 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0258 -0.0006 81 83 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0235 -0.0011 81 82 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1634 +0.1070 1 1 0 0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.
llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779
llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-28 04:46:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm1 # sched: [5:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfnmaddps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [10:1.00]
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfmaddps %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
* All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
* Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...
To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!
# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark Time CPU Time Old Time New CPU Old CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0607 -0.0604 234 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0630 -0.0626 233 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2581 +0.2587 1 2 1 2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0770 -0.0767 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0767 -0.0763 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4170 -0.4156 1 0 1 0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0271 -0.0270 463 450 463 450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0093 -0.0093 453 449 453 449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7280 -0.7280 13 4 13 4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0065 -0.0065 569 565 569 565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0077 -0.0077 569 564 569 564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0077 +1.0068 2 5 2 5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0220 0.0199 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0006 +0.0007 312 312 312 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0031 +0.0032 311 312 311 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7069 -0.7072 4 1 4 1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0015 -0.0015 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0010 -0.0011 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1486 -0.1456 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6139 0.8766 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0008 -0.0005 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0006 -0.0002 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1467 -0.1390 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0137 0.0137 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0002 +0.0002 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0015 -0.0014 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +3.3687 +3.3587 0 2 0 2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.4041 0.3933 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0004 +0.0004 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0000 -0.0000 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1947 +0.1995 0 0 0 0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0074 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0092 +0.0074 547 542 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0054 +0.0115 544 541 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4086 -0.3486 8 5 0 0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.3320 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0015 +0.0204 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0001 +0.0203 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2259 +0.2023 1 1 0 0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0209 -0.0179 96 94 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0182 -0.0155 95 93 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.6164 -0.2703 2 1 2 1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0098 -0.0098 176 175 176 175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0126 -0.0126 176 174 176 174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev +6.9789 +6.9157 0 2 0 2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0237 -0.0238 474 463 474 463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0267 -0.0267 473 461 473 461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.7179 +0.7178 3 5 3 5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6837 0.6554 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0014 -0.0013 1375 1373 1375 1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0018 +0.0019 1371 1374 1371 1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7457 -0.7382 11 3 10 3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0080 -0.0289 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0070 -0.0287 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0977 +0.6614 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0132 +0.0967 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0132 +0.0956 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0407 -0.1695 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0331 +0.1307 13 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0430 +0.1373 12 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.9006 -0.8847 1 0 0 0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0016 0.0010 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0023 -0.0024 395 394 395 394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0029 -0.0030 395 394 395 393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0275 -0.0375 1 1 1 1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0232 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0047 +0.0039 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0050 +0.0037 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0599 -0.2683 1 1 0 0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0206 +0.0207 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0204 +0.0205 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2155 +0.2212 1 1 1 1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0109 -0.0108 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0104 -0.0103 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4919 -0.4800 0 0 0 0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0149 -0.0147 220 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0173 -0.0169 221 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0337 +1.0341 1 3 1 3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0001 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0019 -0.0019 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0021 -0.0021 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4441 -0.4282 0 0 0 0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.4263 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0258 -0.0006 81 83 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0235 -0.0011 81 82 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1634 +0.1070 1 1 0 0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.
llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779
llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-28 04:46:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [10:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-LABEL: v8f32_one_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2: # %bb.0:
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmovaps {{.*#+}} ymm2 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [5:1.00]
|
2017-07-11 00:36:03 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm1 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vsubps %ymm0, %ymm2, %ymm0 # sched: [3:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vaddps %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0 # sched: [3:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [7:2.00]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-LABEL: v8f32_one_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY: # %bb.0:
|
2017-08-13 21:59:24 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm1 # sched: [7:2.00]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmovaps {{.*#+}} ymm2 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [7:0.50]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vsubps %ymm0, %ymm2, %ymm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vaddps %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target.
The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information.
Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB.
Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX.
The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details:
•static latency of the instruction
•number of uOps from which the instruction consists of
•all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs
For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5:
def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> {
let Latency = 9;
let NumMicroOps = 6;
let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1];
}
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>;
Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script.
Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691
llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [12:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-LABEL: v8f32_one_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL: # %bb.0:
|
2017-08-28 18:04:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm1 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vbroadcastss {{.*#+}} ymm2 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [7:0.50]
|
2018-03-11 05:30:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} ymm0 = -(ymm1 * ymm0) + ymm2 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} ymm0 = (ymm0 * ymm1) + ymm1 sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [12:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-LABEL: v8f32_one_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA: # %bb.0:
|
2017-08-28 18:04:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm1 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vbroadcastss {{.*#+}} ymm2 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [7:0.50]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vsubps %ymm0, %ymm2, %ymm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
2017-08-28 18:04:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vaddps %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [12:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-LABEL: v8f32_one_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL: # %bb.0:
|
2017-08-28 18:04:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm1 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vbroadcastss {{.*#+}} ymm2 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [7:0.50]
|
2018-03-11 05:30:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} ymm0 = -(ymm1 * ymm0) + ymm2 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} ymm0 = (ymm0 * ymm1) + ymm1 sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [12:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SKX-LABEL: v8f32_one_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX: # %bb.0:
|
2017-11-05 02:26:41 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm1 # sched: [4:1.00]
|
2018-03-11 05:30:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} ymm0 = -(ymm1 * ymm0) + mem sched: [11:0.50]
|
2018-06-11 22:37:53 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} ymm0 = (ymm0 * ymm1) + ymm1 sched: [4:0.50]
|
2017-10-08 20:52:54 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [11:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2016-12-16 17:56:02 +08:00
|
|
|
%div = fdiv fast <8 x float> <float 1.0, float 2.0, float 3.0, float 4.0, float 5.0, float 6.0, float 7.0, float 8.0>, %x
|
|
|
|
ret <8 x float> %div
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
define <8 x float> @v8f32_one_step_2_divs(<8 x float> %x) #1 {
|
|
|
|
; SSE-LABEL: v8f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE: # %bb.0:
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: rcpps %xmm0, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm2, %xmm0
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps {{.*#+}} xmm3 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0]
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm3, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: subps %xmm0, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm2, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: addps %xmm2, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: rcpps %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm0, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: subps %xmm1, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm0, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: addps %xmm0, %xmm3
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps {{.*#+}} xmm1 = [5.0E+0,6.0E+0,7.0E+0,8.0E+0]
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm3, %xmm1
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = [1.0E+0,2.0E+0,3.0E+0,4.0E+0]
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm4, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm4, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm3, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-LABEL: v8f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP: # %bb.0:
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmovaps {{.*#+}} ymm2 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0]
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vsubps %ymm0, %ymm2, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vaddps %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-LABEL: v8f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP: # %bb.0:
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm1
|
2018-03-11 05:30:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} ymm0 = -(ymm1 * ymm0) + mem
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} ymm0 = (ymm0 * ymm1) + ymm1
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-LABEL: v8f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2: # %bb.0:
|
AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
* All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
* Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...
To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!
# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark Time CPU Time Old Time New CPU Old CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0607 -0.0604 234 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0630 -0.0626 233 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2581 +0.2587 1 2 1 2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0770 -0.0767 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0767 -0.0763 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4170 -0.4156 1 0 1 0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0271 -0.0270 463 450 463 450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0093 -0.0093 453 449 453 449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7280 -0.7280 13 4 13 4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0065 -0.0065 569 565 569 565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0077 -0.0077 569 564 569 564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0077 +1.0068 2 5 2 5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0220 0.0199 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0006 +0.0007 312 312 312 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0031 +0.0032 311 312 311 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7069 -0.7072 4 1 4 1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0015 -0.0015 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0010 -0.0011 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1486 -0.1456 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6139 0.8766 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0008 -0.0005 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0006 -0.0002 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1467 -0.1390 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0137 0.0137 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0002 +0.0002 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0015 -0.0014 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +3.3687 +3.3587 0 2 0 2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.4041 0.3933 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0004 +0.0004 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0000 -0.0000 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1947 +0.1995 0 0 0 0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0074 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0092 +0.0074 547 542 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0054 +0.0115 544 541 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4086 -0.3486 8 5 0 0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.3320 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0015 +0.0204 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0001 +0.0203 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2259 +0.2023 1 1 0 0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0209 -0.0179 96 94 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0182 -0.0155 95 93 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.6164 -0.2703 2 1 2 1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0098 -0.0098 176 175 176 175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0126 -0.0126 176 174 176 174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev +6.9789 +6.9157 0 2 0 2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0237 -0.0238 474 463 474 463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0267 -0.0267 473 461 473 461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.7179 +0.7178 3 5 3 5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6837 0.6554 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0014 -0.0013 1375 1373 1375 1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0018 +0.0019 1371 1374 1371 1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7457 -0.7382 11 3 10 3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0080 -0.0289 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0070 -0.0287 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0977 +0.6614 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0132 +0.0967 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0132 +0.0956 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0407 -0.1695 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0331 +0.1307 13 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0430 +0.1373 12 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.9006 -0.8847 1 0 0 0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0016 0.0010 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0023 -0.0024 395 394 395 394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0029 -0.0030 395 394 395 393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0275 -0.0375 1 1 1 1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0232 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0047 +0.0039 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0050 +0.0037 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0599 -0.2683 1 1 0 0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0206 +0.0207 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0204 +0.0205 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2155 +0.2212 1 1 1 1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0109 -0.0108 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0104 -0.0103 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4919 -0.4800 0 0 0 0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0149 -0.0147 220 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0173 -0.0169 221 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0337 +1.0341 1 3 1 3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0001 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0019 -0.0019 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0021 -0.0021 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4441 -0.4282 0 0 0 0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.4263 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0258 -0.0006 81 83 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0235 -0.0011 81 82 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1634 +0.1070 1 1 0 0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.
llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779
llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-28 04:46:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm1 # sched: [5:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfnmaddps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [10:1.00]
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfmaddps %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
* All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
* Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...
To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!
# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark Time CPU Time Old Time New CPU Old CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0607 -0.0604 234 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0630 -0.0626 233 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2581 +0.2587 1 2 1 2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0770 -0.0767 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0767 -0.0763 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4170 -0.4156 1 0 1 0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0271 -0.0270 463 450 463 450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0093 -0.0093 453 449 453 449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7280 -0.7280 13 4 13 4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0065 -0.0065 569 565 569 565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0077 -0.0077 569 564 569 564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0077 +1.0068 2 5 2 5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0220 0.0199 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0006 +0.0007 312 312 312 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0031 +0.0032 311 312 311 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7069 -0.7072 4 1 4 1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0015 -0.0015 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0010 -0.0011 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1486 -0.1456 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6139 0.8766 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0008 -0.0005 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0006 -0.0002 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1467 -0.1390 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0137 0.0137 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0002 +0.0002 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0015 -0.0014 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +3.3687 +3.3587 0 2 0 2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.4041 0.3933 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0004 +0.0004 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0000 -0.0000 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1947 +0.1995 0 0 0 0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0074 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0092 +0.0074 547 542 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0054 +0.0115 544 541 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4086 -0.3486 8 5 0 0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.3320 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0015 +0.0204 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0001 +0.0203 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2259 +0.2023 1 1 0 0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0209 -0.0179 96 94 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0182 -0.0155 95 93 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.6164 -0.2703 2 1 2 1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0098 -0.0098 176 175 176 175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0126 -0.0126 176 174 176 174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev +6.9789 +6.9157 0 2 0 2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0237 -0.0238 474 463 474 463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0267 -0.0267 473 461 473 461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.7179 +0.7178 3 5 3 5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6837 0.6554 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0014 -0.0013 1375 1373 1375 1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0018 +0.0019 1371 1374 1371 1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7457 -0.7382 11 3 10 3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0080 -0.0289 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0070 -0.0287 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0977 +0.6614 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0132 +0.0967 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0132 +0.0956 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0407 -0.1695 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0331 +0.1307 13 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0430 +0.1373 12 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.9006 -0.8847 1 0 0 0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0016 0.0010 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0023 -0.0024 395 394 395 394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0029 -0.0030 395 394 395 393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0275 -0.0375 1 1 1 1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0232 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0047 +0.0039 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0050 +0.0037 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0599 -0.2683 1 1 0 0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0206 +0.0207 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0204 +0.0205 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2155 +0.2212 1 1 1 1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0109 -0.0108 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0104 -0.0103 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4919 -0.4800 0 0 0 0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0149 -0.0147 220 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0173 -0.0169 221 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0337 +1.0341 1 3 1 3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0001 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0019 -0.0019 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0021 -0.0021 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4441 -0.4282 0 0 0 0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.4263 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0258 -0.0006 81 83 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0235 -0.0011 81 82 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1634 +0.1070 1 1 0 0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.
llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779
llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-28 04:46:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm1 # sched: [10:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0 # sched: [5:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-LABEL: v8f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2: # %bb.0:
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmovaps {{.*#+}} ymm2 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [5:1.00]
|
2017-07-11 00:36:03 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm1 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vsubps %ymm0, %ymm2, %ymm0 # sched: [3:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vaddps %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0 # sched: [3:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm1 # sched: [7:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-LABEL: v8f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY: # %bb.0:
|
2017-08-13 21:59:24 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm1 # sched: [7:2.00]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmovaps {{.*#+}} ymm2 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [7:0.50]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vsubps %ymm0, %ymm2, %ymm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vaddps %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target.
The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information.
Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB.
Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX.
The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details:
•static latency of the instruction
•number of uOps from which the instruction consists of
•all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs
For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5:
def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> {
let Latency = 9;
let NumMicroOps = 6;
let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1];
}
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>;
Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script.
Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691
llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm1 # sched: [12:1.00]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target.
The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information.
Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB.
Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX.
The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details:
•static latency of the instruction
•number of uOps from which the instruction consists of
•all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs
For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5:
def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> {
let Latency = 9;
let NumMicroOps = 6;
let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1];
}
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>;
Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script.
Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691
llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-LABEL: v8f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL: # %bb.0:
|
2017-08-28 18:04:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm1 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vbroadcastss {{.*#+}} ymm2 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [7:0.50]
|
2018-03-11 05:30:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} ymm0 = -(ymm1 * ymm0) + ymm2 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} ymm0 = (ymm0 * ymm1) + ymm1 sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm1 # sched: [12:0.50]
|
2017-08-28 18:04:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-LABEL: v8f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA: # %bb.0:
|
2017-08-28 18:04:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm1 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vbroadcastss {{.*#+}} ymm2 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [7:0.50]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vsubps %ymm0, %ymm2, %ymm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
2017-08-28 18:04:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vaddps %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm1 # sched: [12:0.50]
|
2017-08-28 18:04:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; KNL-LABEL: v8f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL: # %bb.0:
|
2017-08-28 18:04:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm1 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vbroadcastss {{.*#+}} ymm2 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [7:0.50]
|
2018-03-11 05:30:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} ymm0 = -(ymm1 * ymm0) + ymm2 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} ymm0 = (ymm0 * ymm1) + ymm1 sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm1 # sched: [12:0.50]
|
2017-08-28 18:04:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SKX-LABEL: v8f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX: # %bb.0:
|
2017-11-05 02:26:41 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm1 # sched: [4:1.00]
|
2018-03-11 05:30:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} ymm0 = -(ymm1 * ymm0) + mem sched: [11:0.50]
|
2018-06-11 22:37:53 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} ymm0 = (ymm0 * ymm1) + ymm1 sched: [4:0.50]
|
2017-10-08 20:52:54 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm1 # sched: [11:0.50]
|
2018-06-11 22:37:53 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0 # sched: [4:0.50]
|
2017-10-08 20:52:54 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2017-02-10 22:56:12 +08:00
|
|
|
%div = fdiv fast <8 x float> <float 1.0, float 2.0, float 3.0, float 4.0, float 5.0, float 6.0, float 7.0, float 8.0>, %x
|
|
|
|
%div2 = fdiv fast <8 x float> %div, %x
|
|
|
|
ret <8 x float> %div2
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-16 17:56:02 +08:00
|
|
|
define <8 x float> @v8f32_two_step2(<8 x float> %x) #2 {
|
|
|
|
; SSE-LABEL: v8f32_two_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE: # %bb.0:
|
2016-12-16 17:56:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm0, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: rcpps %xmm1, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm1, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm3, %xmm4
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0]
|
2016-12-16 17:56:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm0, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: subps %xmm4, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm3, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: addps %xmm3, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm5, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm0, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: subps %xmm1, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm5, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: addps %xmm5, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: rcpps %xmm2, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm2, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm1, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm0, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: subps %xmm4, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm1, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: addps %xmm1, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm5, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: subps %xmm2, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm5, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: addps %xmm5, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm3, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-LABEL: v8f32_two_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP: # %bb.0:
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm2
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmovaps {{.*#+}} ymm3 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0]
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vsubps %ymm2, %ymm3, %ymm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %ymm2, %ymm1, %ymm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vaddps %ymm2, %ymm1, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vsubps %ymm0, %ymm3, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vaddps %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-LABEL: v8f32_two_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP: # %bb.0:
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm1
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vmovaps {{.*#+}} ymm2 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0]
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vmovaps %ymm1, %ymm3
|
2018-03-11 05:30:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} ymm3 = -(ymm0 * ymm3) + ymm2
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} ymm3 = (ymm3 * ymm1) + ymm1
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} ymm0 = -(ymm3 * ymm0) + ymm2
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} ymm0 = (ymm0 * ymm3) + ymm3
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-LABEL: v8f32_two_step2:
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2: # %bb.0:
|
AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
* All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
* Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...
To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!
# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark Time CPU Time Old Time New CPU Old CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0607 -0.0604 234 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0630 -0.0626 233 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2581 +0.2587 1 2 1 2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0770 -0.0767 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0767 -0.0763 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4170 -0.4156 1 0 1 0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0271 -0.0270 463 450 463 450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0093 -0.0093 453 449 453 449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7280 -0.7280 13 4 13 4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0065 -0.0065 569 565 569 565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0077 -0.0077 569 564 569 564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0077 +1.0068 2 5 2 5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0220 0.0199 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0006 +0.0007 312 312 312 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0031 +0.0032 311 312 311 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7069 -0.7072 4 1 4 1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0015 -0.0015 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0010 -0.0011 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1486 -0.1456 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6139 0.8766 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0008 -0.0005 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0006 -0.0002 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1467 -0.1390 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0137 0.0137 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0002 +0.0002 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0015 -0.0014 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +3.3687 +3.3587 0 2 0 2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.4041 0.3933 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0004 +0.0004 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0000 -0.0000 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1947 +0.1995 0 0 0 0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0074 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0092 +0.0074 547 542 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0054 +0.0115 544 541 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4086 -0.3486 8 5 0 0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.3320 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0015 +0.0204 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0001 +0.0203 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2259 +0.2023 1 1 0 0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0209 -0.0179 96 94 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0182 -0.0155 95 93 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.6164 -0.2703 2 1 2 1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0098 -0.0098 176 175 176 175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0126 -0.0126 176 174 176 174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev +6.9789 +6.9157 0 2 0 2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0237 -0.0238 474 463 474 463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0267 -0.0267 473 461 473 461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.7179 +0.7178 3 5 3 5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6837 0.6554 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0014 -0.0013 1375 1373 1375 1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0018 +0.0019 1371 1374 1371 1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7457 -0.7382 11 3 10 3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0080 -0.0289 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0070 -0.0287 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0977 +0.6614 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0132 +0.0967 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0132 +0.0956 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0407 -0.1695 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0331 +0.1307 13 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0430 +0.1373 12 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.9006 -0.8847 1 0 0 0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0016 0.0010 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0023 -0.0024 395 394 395 394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0029 -0.0030 395 394 395 393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0275 -0.0375 1 1 1 1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0232 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0047 +0.0039 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0050 +0.0037 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0599 -0.2683 1 1 0 0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0206 +0.0207 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0204 +0.0205 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2155 +0.2212 1 1 1 1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0109 -0.0108 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0104 -0.0103 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4919 -0.4800 0 0 0 0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0149 -0.0147 220 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0173 -0.0169 221 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0337 +1.0341 1 3 1 3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0001 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0019 -0.0019 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0021 -0.0021 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4441 -0.4282 0 0 0 0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.4263 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0258 -0.0006 81 83 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0235 -0.0011 81 82 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1634 +0.1070 1 1 0 0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.
llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779
llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-28 04:46:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm1 # sched: [5:2.00]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vmovaps {{.*#+}} ymm2 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [5:0.50]
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfnmaddps %ymm2, %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm3 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfmaddps %ymm1, %ymm3, %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfnmaddps %ymm2, %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfmaddps %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
* All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
* Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...
To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!
# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark Time CPU Time Old Time New CPU Old CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0607 -0.0604 234 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0630 -0.0626 233 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2581 +0.2587 1 2 1 2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0770 -0.0767 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0767 -0.0763 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4170 -0.4156 1 0 1 0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0271 -0.0270 463 450 463 450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0093 -0.0093 453 449 453 449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7280 -0.7280 13 4 13 4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0065 -0.0065 569 565 569 565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0077 -0.0077 569 564 569 564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0077 +1.0068 2 5 2 5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0220 0.0199 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0006 +0.0007 312 312 312 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0031 +0.0032 311 312 311 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7069 -0.7072 4 1 4 1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0015 -0.0015 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0010 -0.0011 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1486 -0.1456 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6139 0.8766 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0008 -0.0005 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0006 -0.0002 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1467 -0.1390 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0137 0.0137 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0002 +0.0002 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0015 -0.0014 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +3.3687 +3.3587 0 2 0 2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.4041 0.3933 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0004 +0.0004 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0000 -0.0000 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1947 +0.1995 0 0 0 0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0074 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0092 +0.0074 547 542 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0054 +0.0115 544 541 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4086 -0.3486 8 5 0 0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.3320 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0015 +0.0204 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0001 +0.0203 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2259 +0.2023 1 1 0 0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0209 -0.0179 96 94 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0182 -0.0155 95 93 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.6164 -0.2703 2 1 2 1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0098 -0.0098 176 175 176 175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0126 -0.0126 176 174 176 174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev +6.9789 +6.9157 0 2 0 2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0237 -0.0238 474 463 474 463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0267 -0.0267 473 461 473 461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.7179 +0.7178 3 5 3 5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6837 0.6554 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0014 -0.0013 1375 1373 1375 1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0018 +0.0019 1371 1374 1371 1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7457 -0.7382 11 3 10 3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0080 -0.0289 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0070 -0.0287 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0977 +0.6614 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0132 +0.0967 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0132 +0.0956 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0407 -0.1695 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0331 +0.1307 13 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0430 +0.1373 12 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.9006 -0.8847 1 0 0 0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0016 0.0010 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0023 -0.0024 395 394 395 394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0029 -0.0030 395 394 395 393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0275 -0.0375 1 1 1 1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0232 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0047 +0.0039 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0050 +0.0037 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0599 -0.2683 1 1 0 0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0206 +0.0207 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0204 +0.0205 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2155 +0.2212 1 1 1 1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0109 -0.0108 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0104 -0.0103 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4919 -0.4800 0 0 0 0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0149 -0.0147 220 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0173 -0.0169 221 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0337 +1.0341 1 3 1 3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0001 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0019 -0.0019 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0021 -0.0021 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4441 -0.4282 0 0 0 0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.4263 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0258 -0.0006 81 83 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0235 -0.0011 81 82 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1634 +0.1070 1 1 0 0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.
llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779
llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-28 04:46:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [10:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-LABEL: v8f32_two_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2: # %bb.0:
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmovaps {{.*#+}} ymm3 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [5:1.00]
|
2017-07-11 00:36:03 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm1 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm2 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vsubps %ymm2, %ymm3, %ymm2 # sched: [3:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps %ymm2, %ymm1, %ymm2 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vaddps %ymm2, %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [3:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vsubps %ymm0, %ymm3, %ymm0 # sched: [3:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vaddps %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0 # sched: [3:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [7:2.00]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-LABEL: v8f32_two_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY: # %bb.0:
|
2017-08-13 21:59:24 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm1 # sched: [7:2.00]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm2 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmovaps {{.*#+}} ymm3 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [7:0.50]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vsubps %ymm2, %ymm3, %ymm2 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps %ymm2, %ymm1, %ymm2 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vaddps %ymm2, %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vsubps %ymm0, %ymm3, %ymm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vaddps %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target.
The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information.
Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB.
Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX.
The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details:
•static latency of the instruction
•number of uOps from which the instruction consists of
•all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs
For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5:
def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> {
let Latency = 9;
let NumMicroOps = 6;
let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1];
}
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>;
Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script.
Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691
llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [12:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-LABEL: v8f32_two_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL: # %bb.0:
|
2017-08-28 18:04:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm1 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vbroadcastss {{.*#+}} ymm2 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [7:0.50]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vmovaps %ymm1, %ymm3 # sched: [1:1.00]
|
2018-03-11 05:30:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} ymm3 = -(ymm0 * ymm3) + ymm2 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} ymm3 = (ymm3 * ymm1) + ymm1 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} ymm0 = -(ymm3 * ymm0) + ymm2 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} ymm0 = (ymm0 * ymm3) + ymm3 sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [12:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-LABEL: v8f32_two_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA: # %bb.0:
|
2017-08-28 18:04:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm1 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm2 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vbroadcastss {{.*#+}} ymm3 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [7:0.50]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vsubps %ymm2, %ymm3, %ymm2 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
2017-08-28 18:04:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps %ymm2, %ymm1, %ymm2 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vaddps %ymm2, %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
2017-08-28 18:04:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps %ymm1, %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vsubps %ymm0, %ymm3, %ymm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
2017-08-28 18:04:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vaddps %ymm0, %ymm1, %ymm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [12:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-LABEL: v8f32_two_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL: # %bb.0:
|
2017-08-28 18:04:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm1 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vbroadcastss {{.*#+}} ymm2 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [7:0.50]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vmovaps %ymm1, %ymm3 # sched: [1:1.00]
|
2018-03-11 05:30:46 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} ymm3 = -(ymm0 * ymm3) + ymm2 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} ymm3 = (ymm3 * ymm1) + ymm1 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} ymm0 = -(ymm3 * ymm0) + ymm2 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} ymm0 = (ymm0 * ymm3) + ymm3 sched: [5:0.50]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [12:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SKX-LABEL: v8f32_two_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX: # %bb.0:
|
2017-11-05 02:26:41 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm1 # sched: [4:1.00]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vbroadcastss {{.*#+}} ymm2 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [7:0.50]
|
2017-12-10 09:24:08 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vmovaps %ymm1, %ymm3 # sched: [1:0.33]
|
2018-06-11 22:37:53 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} ymm3 = -(ymm0 * ymm3) + ymm2 sched: [4:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} ymm3 = (ymm3 * ymm1) + ymm1 sched: [4:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} ymm0 = -(ymm3 * ymm0) + ymm2 sched: [4:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} ymm0 = (ymm0 * ymm3) + ymm3 sched: [4:0.50]
|
2017-10-08 20:52:54 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [11:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2016-12-16 17:56:02 +08:00
|
|
|
%div = fdiv fast <8 x float> <float 1.0, float 2.0, float 3.0, float 4.0, float 5.0, float 6.0, float 7.0, float 8.0>, %x
|
|
|
|
ret <8 x float> %div
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define <8 x float> @v8f32_no_step(<8 x float> %x) #3 {
|
|
|
|
; SSE-LABEL: v8f32_no_step:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE: # %bb.0:
|
2016-12-16 17:56:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: rcpps %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: rcpps %xmm1, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-LABEL: v8f32_no_step:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP: # %bb.0:
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-LABEL: v8f32_no_step:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP: # %bb.0:
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-LABEL: v8f32_no_step:
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2: # %bb.0:
|
AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
* All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
* Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...
To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!
# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark Time CPU Time Old Time New CPU Old CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0607 -0.0604 234 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0630 -0.0626 233 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2581 +0.2587 1 2 1 2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0770 -0.0767 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0767 -0.0763 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4170 -0.4156 1 0 1 0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0271 -0.0270 463 450 463 450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0093 -0.0093 453 449 453 449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7280 -0.7280 13 4 13 4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0065 -0.0065 569 565 569 565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0077 -0.0077 569 564 569 564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0077 +1.0068 2 5 2 5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0220 0.0199 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0006 +0.0007 312 312 312 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0031 +0.0032 311 312 311 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7069 -0.7072 4 1 4 1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0015 -0.0015 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0010 -0.0011 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1486 -0.1456 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6139 0.8766 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0008 -0.0005 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0006 -0.0002 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1467 -0.1390 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0137 0.0137 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0002 +0.0002 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0015 -0.0014 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +3.3687 +3.3587 0 2 0 2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.4041 0.3933 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0004 +0.0004 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0000 -0.0000 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1947 +0.1995 0 0 0 0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0074 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0092 +0.0074 547 542 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0054 +0.0115 544 541 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4086 -0.3486 8 5 0 0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.3320 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0015 +0.0204 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0001 +0.0203 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2259 +0.2023 1 1 0 0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0209 -0.0179 96 94 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0182 -0.0155 95 93 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.6164 -0.2703 2 1 2 1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0098 -0.0098 176 175 176 175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0126 -0.0126 176 174 176 174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev +6.9789 +6.9157 0 2 0 2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0237 -0.0238 474 463 474 463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0267 -0.0267 473 461 473 461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.7179 +0.7178 3 5 3 5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6837 0.6554 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0014 -0.0013 1375 1373 1375 1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0018 +0.0019 1371 1374 1371 1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7457 -0.7382 11 3 10 3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0080 -0.0289 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0070 -0.0287 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0977 +0.6614 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0132 +0.0967 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0132 +0.0956 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0407 -0.1695 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0331 +0.1307 13 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0430 +0.1373 12 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.9006 -0.8847 1 0 0 0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0016 0.0010 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0023 -0.0024 395 394 395 394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0029 -0.0030 395 394 395 393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0275 -0.0375 1 1 1 1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0232 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0047 +0.0039 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0050 +0.0037 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0599 -0.2683 1 1 0 0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0206 +0.0207 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0204 +0.0205 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2155 +0.2212 1 1 1 1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0109 -0.0108 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0104 -0.0103 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4919 -0.4800 0 0 0 0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0149 -0.0147 220 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0173 -0.0169 221 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0337 +1.0341 1 3 1 3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0001 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0019 -0.0019 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0021 -0.0021 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4441 -0.4282 0 0 0 0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.4263 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0258 -0.0006 81 83 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0235 -0.0011 81 82 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1634 +0.1070 1 1 0 0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.
llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779
llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-28 04:46:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [5:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-LABEL: v8f32_no_step:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2: # %bb.0:
|
2017-07-11 00:36:03 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-LABEL: v8f32_no_step:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY: # %bb.0:
|
2017-08-13 21:59:24 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [7:2.00]
|
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target.
The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information.
Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB.
Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX.
The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details:
•static latency of the instruction
•number of uOps from which the instruction consists of
•all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs
For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5:
def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> {
let Latency = 9;
let NumMicroOps = 6;
let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1];
}
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>;
Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script.
Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691
llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-LABEL: v8f32_no_step:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL: # %bb.0:
|
2017-08-28 18:04:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-LABEL: v8f32_no_step:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA: # %bb.0:
|
2017-08-28 18:04:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-LABEL: v8f32_no_step:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL: # %bb.0:
|
2017-08-28 18:04:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SKX-LABEL: v8f32_no_step:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX: # %bb.0:
|
2017-11-05 02:26:41 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [4:1.00]
|
2017-10-08 20:52:54 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2016-12-16 17:56:02 +08:00
|
|
|
%div = fdiv fast <8 x float> <float 1.0, float 1.0, float 1.0, float 1.0, float 1.0, float 1.0, float 1.0, float 1.0>, %x
|
|
|
|
ret <8 x float> %div
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define <8 x float> @v8f32_no_step2(<8 x float> %x) #3 {
|
|
|
|
; SSE-LABEL: v8f32_no_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE: # %bb.0:
|
2016-12-16 17:56:02 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: rcpps %xmm1, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: rcpps %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-LABEL: v8f32_no_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP: # %bb.0:
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-LABEL: v8f32_no_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP: # %bb.0:
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-LABEL: v8f32_no_step2:
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2: # %bb.0:
|
AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
* All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
* Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...
To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!
# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark Time CPU Time Old Time New CPU Old CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0607 -0.0604 234 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0630 -0.0626 233 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2581 +0.2587 1 2 1 2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0770 -0.0767 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0767 -0.0763 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4170 -0.4156 1 0 1 0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0271 -0.0270 463 450 463 450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0093 -0.0093 453 449 453 449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7280 -0.7280 13 4 13 4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0065 -0.0065 569 565 569 565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0077 -0.0077 569 564 569 564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0077 +1.0068 2 5 2 5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0220 0.0199 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0006 +0.0007 312 312 312 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0031 +0.0032 311 312 311 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7069 -0.7072 4 1 4 1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0015 -0.0015 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0010 -0.0011 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1486 -0.1456 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6139 0.8766 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0008 -0.0005 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0006 -0.0002 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1467 -0.1390 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0137 0.0137 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0002 +0.0002 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0015 -0.0014 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +3.3687 +3.3587 0 2 0 2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.4041 0.3933 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0004 +0.0004 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0000 -0.0000 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1947 +0.1995 0 0 0 0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0074 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0092 +0.0074 547 542 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0054 +0.0115 544 541 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4086 -0.3486 8 5 0 0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.3320 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0015 +0.0204 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0001 +0.0203 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2259 +0.2023 1 1 0 0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0209 -0.0179 96 94 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0182 -0.0155 95 93 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.6164 -0.2703 2 1 2 1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0098 -0.0098 176 175 176 175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0126 -0.0126 176 174 176 174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev +6.9789 +6.9157 0 2 0 2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0237 -0.0238 474 463 474 463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0267 -0.0267 473 461 473 461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.7179 +0.7178 3 5 3 5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6837 0.6554 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0014 -0.0013 1375 1373 1375 1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0018 +0.0019 1371 1374 1371 1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7457 -0.7382 11 3 10 3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0080 -0.0289 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0070 -0.0287 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0977 +0.6614 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0132 +0.0967 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0132 +0.0956 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0407 -0.1695 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0331 +0.1307 13 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0430 +0.1373 12 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.9006 -0.8847 1 0 0 0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0016 0.0010 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0023 -0.0024 395 394 395 394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0029 -0.0030 395 394 395 393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0275 -0.0375 1 1 1 1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0232 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0047 +0.0039 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0050 +0.0037 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0599 -0.2683 1 1 0 0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0206 +0.0207 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0204 +0.0205 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2155 +0.2212 1 1 1 1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0109 -0.0108 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0104 -0.0103 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4919 -0.4800 0 0 0 0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0149 -0.0147 220 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0173 -0.0169 221 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0337 +1.0341 1 3 1 3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0001 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0019 -0.0019 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0021 -0.0021 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4441 -0.4282 0 0 0 0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.4263 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0258 -0.0006 81 83 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0235 -0.0011 81 82 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1634 +0.1070 1 1 0 0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.
llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779
llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-28 04:46:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [5:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [10:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-LABEL: v8f32_no_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2: # %bb.0:
|
2017-07-11 00:36:03 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [7:2.00]
|
2017-04-14 15:44:23 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-LABEL: v8f32_no_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY: # %bb.0:
|
2017-08-13 21:59:24 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [7:2.00]
|
This patch completely replaces the scheduling information for the SandyBridge architecture target by modifying the file X86SchedSandyBridge.td located under the X86 Target.
The SandyBridge architects have provided us with a more accurate information about each instruction latency, number of uOPs and used ports and I used it to replace the existing estimated SNB instructions scheduling and to add missing scheduling information.
Please note that the patch extensively affects the X86 MC instr scheduling for SNB.
Also note that this patch will be followed by additional patches for the remaining target architectures HSW, IVB, BDW, SKL and SKX.
The updated and extended information about each instruction includes the following details:
•static latency of the instruction
•number of uOps from which the instruction consists of
•all ports used by the instruction's' uOPs
For example, the following code dictates that instructions, ADC64mr, ADC8mr, SBB64mr, SBB8mr have a static latency of 9 cycles. Each of these instructions is decoded into 6 micro operations which use ports 4, ports 2 or 3 and port 0 and ports 0 or 1 or 5:
def SBWriteResGroup94 : SchedWriteRes<[SBPort4,SBPort23,SBPort0,SBPort015]> {
let Latency = 9;
let NumMicroOps = 6;
let ResourceCycles = [1,2,2,1];
}
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "ADC8mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB64mr")>;
def: InstRW<[SBWriteResGroup94], (instregex "SBB8mr")>;
Note that apart for the header, most of the X86SchedSandyBridge.td file was generated by a script.
Reviewers: zvi, chandlerc, RKSimon, m_zuckerman, craig.topper, igorb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35019#inline-304691
llvm-svn: 307529
2017-07-10 17:53:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [12:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-LABEL: v8f32_no_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL: # %bb.0:
|
2017-08-28 18:04:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [12:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-LABEL: v8f32_no_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA: # %bb.0:
|
2017-08-28 18:04:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [12:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2017-02-09 22:14:06 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-LABEL: v8f32_no_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL: # %bb.0:
|
2017-08-28 18:04:16 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
2017-12-08 17:48:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [12:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2017-02-06 02:26:17 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SKX-LABEL: v8f32_no_step2:
|
2017-12-05 01:18:51 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX: # %bb.0:
|
2017-11-05 02:26:41 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [4:1.00]
|
2017-10-08 20:52:54 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [11:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
2016-12-16 17:56:02 +08:00
|
|
|
%div = fdiv fast <8 x float> <float 1.0, float 2.0, float 3.0, float 4.0, float 5.0, float 6.0, float 7.0, float 8.0>, %x
|
|
|
|
ret <8 x float> %div
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
define <16 x float> @v16f32_one_step2(<16 x float> %x) #1 {
|
|
|
|
; SSE-LABEL: v16f32_one_step2:
|
|
|
|
; SSE: # %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm3, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm2, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm0, %xmm6
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: rcpps %xmm3, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm2, %xmm4
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0]
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm0, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: subps %xmm4, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm2, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: addps %xmm2, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: rcpps %xmm5, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm4, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm0, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: subps %xmm5, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm4, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: addps %xmm4, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: rcpps %xmm1, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm5, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm0, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: subps %xmm1, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm5, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: addps %xmm5, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: rcpps %xmm6, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm1, %xmm6
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: subps %xmm6, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: addps %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm4, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-LABEL: v16f32_one_step2:
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP: # %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm1, %ymm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %ymm2, %ymm1, %ymm1
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmovaps {{.*#+}} ymm3 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0]
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vsubps %ymm1, %ymm3, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %ymm1, %ymm2, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vaddps %ymm1, %ymm2, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %ymm2, %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vsubps %ymm0, %ymm3, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm2, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vaddps %ymm0, %ymm2, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm1, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-LABEL: v16f32_one_step2:
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP: # %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm1, %ymm2
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vmovaps {{.*#+}} ymm3 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0]
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} ymm1 = -(ymm2 * ymm1) + ymm3
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} ymm1 = (ymm1 * ymm2) + ymm2
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm2
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} ymm0 = -(ymm2 * ymm0) + ymm3
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} ymm0 = (ymm0 * ymm2) + ymm2
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm1, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-LABEL: v16f32_one_step2:
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2: # %bb.0:
|
AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
* All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
* Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...
To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!
# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark Time CPU Time Old Time New CPU Old CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0607 -0.0604 234 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0630 -0.0626 233 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2581 +0.2587 1 2 1 2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0770 -0.0767 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0767 -0.0763 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4170 -0.4156 1 0 1 0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0271 -0.0270 463 450 463 450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0093 -0.0093 453 449 453 449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7280 -0.7280 13 4 13 4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0065 -0.0065 569 565 569 565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0077 -0.0077 569 564 569 564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0077 +1.0068 2 5 2 5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0220 0.0199 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0006 +0.0007 312 312 312 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0031 +0.0032 311 312 311 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7069 -0.7072 4 1 4 1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0015 -0.0015 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0010 -0.0011 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1486 -0.1456 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6139 0.8766 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0008 -0.0005 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0006 -0.0002 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1467 -0.1390 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0137 0.0137 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0002 +0.0002 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0015 -0.0014 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +3.3687 +3.3587 0 2 0 2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.4041 0.3933 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0004 +0.0004 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0000 -0.0000 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1947 +0.1995 0 0 0 0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0074 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0092 +0.0074 547 542 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0054 +0.0115 544 541 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4086 -0.3486 8 5 0 0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.3320 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0015 +0.0204 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0001 +0.0203 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2259 +0.2023 1 1 0 0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0209 -0.0179 96 94 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0182 -0.0155 95 93 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.6164 -0.2703 2 1 2 1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0098 -0.0098 176 175 176 175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0126 -0.0126 176 174 176 174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev +6.9789 +6.9157 0 2 0 2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0237 -0.0238 474 463 474 463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0267 -0.0267 473 461 473 461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.7179 +0.7178 3 5 3 5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6837 0.6554 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0014 -0.0013 1375 1373 1375 1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0018 +0.0019 1371 1374 1371 1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7457 -0.7382 11 3 10 3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0080 -0.0289 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0070 -0.0287 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0977 +0.6614 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0132 +0.0967 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0132 +0.0956 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0407 -0.1695 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0331 +0.1307 13 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0430 +0.1373 12 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.9006 -0.8847 1 0 0 0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0016 0.0010 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0023 -0.0024 395 394 395 394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0029 -0.0030 395 394 395 393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0275 -0.0375 1 1 1 1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0232 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0047 +0.0039 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0050 +0.0037 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0599 -0.2683 1 1 0 0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0206 +0.0207 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0204 +0.0205 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2155 +0.2212 1 1 1 1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0109 -0.0108 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0104 -0.0103 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4919 -0.4800 0 0 0 0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0149 -0.0147 220 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0173 -0.0169 221 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0337 +1.0341 1 3 1 3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0001 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0019 -0.0019 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0021 -0.0021 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4441 -0.4282 0 0 0 0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.4263 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0258 -0.0006 81 83 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0235 -0.0011 81 82 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1634 +0.1070 1 1 0 0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.
llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779
llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-28 04:46:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm1, %ymm2 # sched: [5:2.00]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vmovaps {{.*#+}} ymm3 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [5:0.50]
|
AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
* All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
* Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...
To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!
# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark Time CPU Time Old Time New CPU Old CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0607 -0.0604 234 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0630 -0.0626 233 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2581 +0.2587 1 2 1 2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0770 -0.0767 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0767 -0.0763 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4170 -0.4156 1 0 1 0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0271 -0.0270 463 450 463 450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0093 -0.0093 453 449 453 449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7280 -0.7280 13 4 13 4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0065 -0.0065 569 565 569 565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0077 -0.0077 569 564 569 564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0077 +1.0068 2 5 2 5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0220 0.0199 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0006 +0.0007 312 312 312 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0031 +0.0032 311 312 311 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7069 -0.7072 4 1 4 1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0015 -0.0015 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0010 -0.0011 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1486 -0.1456 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6139 0.8766 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0008 -0.0005 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0006 -0.0002 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1467 -0.1390 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0137 0.0137 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0002 +0.0002 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0015 -0.0014 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +3.3687 +3.3587 0 2 0 2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.4041 0.3933 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0004 +0.0004 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0000 -0.0000 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1947 +0.1995 0 0 0 0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0074 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0092 +0.0074 547 542 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0054 +0.0115 544 541 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4086 -0.3486 8 5 0 0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.3320 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0015 +0.0204 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0001 +0.0203 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2259 +0.2023 1 1 0 0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0209 -0.0179 96 94 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0182 -0.0155 95 93 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.6164 -0.2703 2 1 2 1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0098 -0.0098 176 175 176 175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0126 -0.0126 176 174 176 174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev +6.9789 +6.9157 0 2 0 2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0237 -0.0238 474 463 474 463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0267 -0.0267 473 461 473 461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.7179 +0.7178 3 5 3 5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6837 0.6554 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0014 -0.0013 1375 1373 1375 1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0018 +0.0019 1371 1374 1371 1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7457 -0.7382 11 3 10 3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0080 -0.0289 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0070 -0.0287 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0977 +0.6614 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0132 +0.0967 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0132 +0.0956 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0407 -0.1695 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0331 +0.1307 13 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0430 +0.1373 12 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.9006 -0.8847 1 0 0 0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0016 0.0010 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0023 -0.0024 395 394 395 394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0029 -0.0030 395 394 395 393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0275 -0.0375 1 1 1 1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0232 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0047 +0.0039 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0050 +0.0037 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0599 -0.2683 1 1 0 0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0206 +0.0207 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0204 +0.0205 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2155 +0.2212 1 1 1 1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0109 -0.0108 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0104 -0.0103 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4919 -0.4800 0 0 0 0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0149 -0.0147 220 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0173 -0.0169 221 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0337 +1.0341 1 3 1 3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0001 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0019 -0.0019 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0021 -0.0021 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4441 -0.4282 0 0 0 0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.4263 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0258 -0.0006 81 83 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0235 -0.0011 81 82 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1634 +0.1070 1 1 0 0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.
llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779
llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-28 04:46:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm4 # sched: [5:2.00]
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfnmaddps %ymm3, %ymm2, %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfnmaddps %ymm3, %ymm4, %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
* All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
* Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...
To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!
# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark Time CPU Time Old Time New CPU Old CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0607 -0.0604 234 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0630 -0.0626 233 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2581 +0.2587 1 2 1 2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0770 -0.0767 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0767 -0.0763 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4170 -0.4156 1 0 1 0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0271 -0.0270 463 450 463 450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0093 -0.0093 453 449 453 449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7280 -0.7280 13 4 13 4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0065 -0.0065 569 565 569 565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0077 -0.0077 569 564 569 564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0077 +1.0068 2 5 2 5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0220 0.0199 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0006 +0.0007 312 312 312 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0031 +0.0032 311 312 311 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7069 -0.7072 4 1 4 1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0015 -0.0015 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0010 -0.0011 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1486 -0.1456 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6139 0.8766 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0008 -0.0005 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0006 -0.0002 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1467 -0.1390 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0137 0.0137 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0002 +0.0002 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0015 -0.0014 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +3.3687 +3.3587 0 2 0 2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.4041 0.3933 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0004 +0.0004 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0000 -0.0000 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1947 +0.1995 0 0 0 0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0074 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0092 +0.0074 547 542 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0054 +0.0115 544 541 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4086 -0.3486 8 5 0 0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.3320 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0015 +0.0204 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0001 +0.0203 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2259 +0.2023 1 1 0 0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0209 -0.0179 96 94 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0182 -0.0155 95 93 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.6164 -0.2703 2 1 2 1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0098 -0.0098 176 175 176 175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0126 -0.0126 176 174 176 174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev +6.9789 +6.9157 0 2 0 2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0237 -0.0238 474 463 474 463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0267 -0.0267 473 461 473 461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.7179 +0.7178 3 5 3 5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6837 0.6554 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0014 -0.0013 1375 1373 1375 1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0018 +0.0019 1371 1374 1371 1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7457 -0.7382 11 3 10 3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0080 -0.0289 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0070 -0.0287 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0977 +0.6614 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0132 +0.0967 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0132 +0.0956 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0407 -0.1695 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0331 +0.1307 13 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0430 +0.1373 12 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.9006 -0.8847 1 0 0 0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0016 0.0010 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0023 -0.0024 395 394 395 394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0029 -0.0030 395 394 395 393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0275 -0.0375 1 1 1 1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0232 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0047 +0.0039 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0050 +0.0037 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0599 -0.2683 1 1 0 0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0206 +0.0207 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0204 +0.0205 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2155 +0.2212 1 1 1 1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0109 -0.0108 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0104 -0.0103 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4919 -0.4800 0 0 0 0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0149 -0.0147 220 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0173 -0.0169 221 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0337 +1.0341 1 3 1 3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0001 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0019 -0.0019 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0021 -0.0021 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4441 -0.4282 0 0 0 0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.4263 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0258 -0.0006 81 83 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0235 -0.0011 81 82 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1634 +0.1070 1 1 0 0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.
llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779
llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-28 04:46:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfmaddps %ymm2, %ymm1, %ymm2, %ymm1 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfmaddps %ymm4, %ymm0, %ymm4, %ymm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
* All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
* Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...
To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!
# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark Time CPU Time Old Time New CPU Old CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0607 -0.0604 234 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0630 -0.0626 233 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2581 +0.2587 1 2 1 2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0770 -0.0767 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0767 -0.0763 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4170 -0.4156 1 0 1 0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0271 -0.0270 463 450 463 450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0093 -0.0093 453 449 453 449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7280 -0.7280 13 4 13 4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0065 -0.0065 569 565 569 565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0077 -0.0077 569 564 569 564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0077 +1.0068 2 5 2 5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0220 0.0199 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0006 +0.0007 312 312 312 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0031 +0.0032 311 312 311 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7069 -0.7072 4 1 4 1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0015 -0.0015 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0010 -0.0011 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1486 -0.1456 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6139 0.8766 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0008 -0.0005 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0006 -0.0002 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1467 -0.1390 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0137 0.0137 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0002 +0.0002 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0015 -0.0014 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +3.3687 +3.3587 0 2 0 2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.4041 0.3933 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0004 +0.0004 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0000 -0.0000 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1947 +0.1995 0 0 0 0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0074 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0092 +0.0074 547 542 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0054 +0.0115 544 541 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4086 -0.3486 8 5 0 0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.3320 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0015 +0.0204 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0001 +0.0203 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2259 +0.2023 1 1 0 0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0209 -0.0179 96 94 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0182 -0.0155 95 93 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.6164 -0.2703 2 1 2 1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0098 -0.0098 176 175 176 175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0126 -0.0126 176 174 176 174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev +6.9789 +6.9157 0 2 0 2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0237 -0.0238 474 463 474 463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0267 -0.0267 473 461 473 461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.7179 +0.7178 3 5 3 5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6837 0.6554 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0014 -0.0013 1375 1373 1375 1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0018 +0.0019 1371 1374 1371 1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7457 -0.7382 11 3 10 3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0080 -0.0289 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0070 -0.0287 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0977 +0.6614 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0132 +0.0967 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0132 +0.0956 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0407 -0.1695 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0331 +0.1307 13 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0430 +0.1373 12 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.9006 -0.8847 1 0 0 0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0016 0.0010 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0023 -0.0024 395 394 395 394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0029 -0.0030 395 394 395 393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0275 -0.0375 1 1 1 1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0232 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0047 +0.0039 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0050 +0.0037 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0599 -0.2683 1 1 0 0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0206 +0.0207 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0204 +0.0205 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2155 +0.2212 1 1 1 1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0109 -0.0108 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0104 -0.0103 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4919 -0.4800 0 0 0 0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0149 -0.0147 220 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0173 -0.0169 221 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0337 +1.0341 1 3 1 3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0001 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0019 -0.0019 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0021 -0.0021 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4441 -0.4282 0 0 0 0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.4263 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0258 -0.0006 81 83 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0235 -0.0011 81 82 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1634 +0.1070 1 1 0 0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.
llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779
llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-28 04:46:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [10:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [10:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-LABEL: v16f32_one_step2:
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2: # %bb.0:
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmovaps {{.*#+}} ymm3 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm1, %ymm2 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm4 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps %ymm2, %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps %ymm4, %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vsubps %ymm1, %ymm3, %ymm1 # sched: [3:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vsubps %ymm0, %ymm3, %ymm0 # sched: [3:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps %ymm1, %ymm2, %ymm1 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm4, %ymm0 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vaddps %ymm1, %ymm2, %ymm1 # sched: [3:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vaddps %ymm0, %ymm4, %ymm0 # sched: [3:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [7:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [7:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-LABEL: v16f32_one_step2:
|
|
|
|
; SANDY: # %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm1, %ymm2 # sched: [7:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps %ymm2, %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmovaps {{.*#+}} ymm3 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [7:0.50]
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vsubps %ymm1, %ymm3, %ymm1 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps %ymm1, %ymm2, %ymm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vaddps %ymm1, %ymm2, %ymm1 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm2 # sched: [7:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps %ymm2, %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vsubps %ymm0, %ymm3, %ymm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm2, %ymm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vaddps %ymm0, %ymm2, %ymm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [12:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [12:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-LABEL: v16f32_one_step2:
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL: # %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm1, %ymm2 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vbroadcastss {{.*#+}} ymm3 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [7:0.50]
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm4 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} ymm1 = -(ymm2 * ymm1) + ymm3 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} ymm1 = (ymm1 * ymm2) + ymm2 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} ymm0 = -(ymm4 * ymm0) + ymm3 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} ymm0 = (ymm0 * ymm4) + ymm4 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [12:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [12:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-LABEL: v16f32_one_step2:
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA: # %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm1, %ymm2 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps %ymm2, %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vbroadcastss {{.*#+}} ymm3 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [7:0.50]
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vsubps %ymm1, %ymm3, %ymm1 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps %ymm1, %ymm2, %ymm1 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vaddps %ymm1, %ymm2, %ymm1 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm2 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps %ymm2, %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vsubps %ymm0, %ymm3, %ymm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm2, %ymm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vaddps %ymm0, %ymm2, %ymm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [12:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [12:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; KNL-LABEL: v16f32_one_step2:
|
|
|
|
; KNL: # %bb.0:
|
2018-05-07 19:50:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vrcp14ps %zmm0, %zmm1 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
2018-05-07 01:48:21 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} zmm0 = -(zmm1 * zmm0) + mem sched: [12:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} zmm0 = (zmm0 * zmm1) + zmm1 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %zmm0, %zmm0 # sched: [12:0.50]
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SKX-LABEL: v16f32_one_step2:
|
|
|
|
; SKX: # %bb.0:
|
2018-06-11 22:37:53 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vrcp14ps %zmm0, %zmm1 # sched: [4:2.00]
|
2018-05-07 01:48:21 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} zmm0 = -(zmm1 * zmm0) + mem sched: [11:0.50]
|
2018-06-11 22:37:53 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} zmm0 = (zmm0 * zmm1) + zmm1 sched: [4:0.50]
|
2018-05-07 01:48:21 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %zmm0, %zmm0 # sched: [11:0.50]
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
|
|
|
%div = fdiv fast <16 x float> <float 1.0, float 2.0, float 3.0, float 4.0, float 5.0, float 6.0, float 7.0, float 8.0, float 9.0, float 10.0, float 11.0, float 12.0, float 13.0, float 14.0, float 15.0, float 16.0>, %x
|
|
|
|
ret <16 x float> %div
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define <16 x float> @v16f32_one_step_2_divs(<16 x float> %x) #1 {
|
|
|
|
; SSE-LABEL: v16f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
|
|
|
; SSE: # %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: rcpps %xmm0, %xmm6
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm6, %xmm0
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps {{.*#+}} xmm4 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0]
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm4, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: subps %xmm0, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm6, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: addps %xmm6, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: rcpps %xmm1, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm0, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm4, %xmm6
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: subps %xmm1, %xmm6
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm0, %xmm6
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: addps %xmm0, %xmm6
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: rcpps %xmm2, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm0, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm4, %xmm7
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: subps %xmm2, %xmm7
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm0, %xmm7
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: addps %xmm0, %xmm7
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: rcpps %xmm3, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm0, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: subps %xmm3, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm0, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: addps %xmm0, %xmm4
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps {{.*#+}} xmm3 = [1.3E+1,1.4E+1,1.5E+1,1.6E+1]
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm4, %xmm3
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps {{.*#+}} xmm2 = [9.0E+0,1.0E+1,1.1E+1,1.2E+1]
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm7, %xmm2
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps {{.*#+}} xmm1 = [5.0E+0,6.0E+0,7.0E+0,8.0E+0]
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm6, %xmm1
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = [1.0E+0,2.0E+0,3.0E+0,4.0E+0]
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm5, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm5, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm6, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm7, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm4, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-LABEL: v16f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP: # %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %ymm2, %ymm0, %ymm0
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmovaps {{.*#+}} ymm3 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0]
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vsubps %ymm0, %ymm3, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm2, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vaddps %ymm0, %ymm2, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm1, %ymm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %ymm2, %ymm1, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vsubps %ymm1, %ymm3, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %ymm1, %ymm2, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vaddps %ymm1, %ymm2, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm1, %ymm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm3
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm3, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %ymm1, %ymm2, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-LABEL: v16f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP: # %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm2
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vmovaps {{.*#+}} ymm3 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0]
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} ymm0 = -(ymm2 * ymm0) + ymm3
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} ymm0 = (ymm0 * ymm2) + ymm2
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm1, %ymm2
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} ymm1 = -(ymm2 * ymm1) + ymm3
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} ymm1 = (ymm1 * ymm2) + ymm2
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm1, %ymm2
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm3
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm3, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %ymm1, %ymm2, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-LABEL: v16f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2: # %bb.0:
|
AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
* All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
* Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...
To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!
# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark Time CPU Time Old Time New CPU Old CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0607 -0.0604 234 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0630 -0.0626 233 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2581 +0.2587 1 2 1 2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0770 -0.0767 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0767 -0.0763 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4170 -0.4156 1 0 1 0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0271 -0.0270 463 450 463 450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0093 -0.0093 453 449 453 449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7280 -0.7280 13 4 13 4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0065 -0.0065 569 565 569 565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0077 -0.0077 569 564 569 564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0077 +1.0068 2 5 2 5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0220 0.0199 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0006 +0.0007 312 312 312 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0031 +0.0032 311 312 311 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7069 -0.7072 4 1 4 1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0015 -0.0015 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0010 -0.0011 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1486 -0.1456 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6139 0.8766 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0008 -0.0005 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0006 -0.0002 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1467 -0.1390 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0137 0.0137 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0002 +0.0002 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0015 -0.0014 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +3.3687 +3.3587 0 2 0 2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.4041 0.3933 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0004 +0.0004 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0000 -0.0000 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1947 +0.1995 0 0 0 0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0074 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0092 +0.0074 547 542 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0054 +0.0115 544 541 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4086 -0.3486 8 5 0 0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.3320 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0015 +0.0204 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0001 +0.0203 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2259 +0.2023 1 1 0 0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0209 -0.0179 96 94 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0182 -0.0155 95 93 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.6164 -0.2703 2 1 2 1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0098 -0.0098 176 175 176 175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0126 -0.0126 176 174 176 174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev +6.9789 +6.9157 0 2 0 2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0237 -0.0238 474 463 474 463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0267 -0.0267 473 461 473 461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.7179 +0.7178 3 5 3 5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6837 0.6554 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0014 -0.0013 1375 1373 1375 1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0018 +0.0019 1371 1374 1371 1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7457 -0.7382 11 3 10 3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0080 -0.0289 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0070 -0.0287 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0977 +0.6614 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0132 +0.0967 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0132 +0.0956 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0407 -0.1695 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0331 +0.1307 13 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0430 +0.1373 12 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.9006 -0.8847 1 0 0 0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0016 0.0010 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0023 -0.0024 395 394 395 394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0029 -0.0030 395 394 395 393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0275 -0.0375 1 1 1 1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0232 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0047 +0.0039 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0050 +0.0037 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0599 -0.2683 1 1 0 0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0206 +0.0207 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0204 +0.0205 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2155 +0.2212 1 1 1 1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0109 -0.0108 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0104 -0.0103 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4919 -0.4800 0 0 0 0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0149 -0.0147 220 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0173 -0.0169 221 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0337 +1.0341 1 3 1 3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0001 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0019 -0.0019 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0021 -0.0021 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4441 -0.4282 0 0 0 0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.4263 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0258 -0.0006 81 83 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0235 -0.0011 81 82 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1634 +0.1070 1 1 0 0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.
llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779
llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-28 04:46:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm2 # sched: [5:2.00]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vmovaps {{.*#+}} ymm3 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [5:0.50]
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfnmaddps %ymm3, %ymm2, %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfmaddps %ymm2, %ymm0, %ymm2, %ymm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
* All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
* Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...
To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!
# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark Time CPU Time Old Time New CPU Old CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0607 -0.0604 234 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0630 -0.0626 233 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2581 +0.2587 1 2 1 2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0770 -0.0767 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0767 -0.0763 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4170 -0.4156 1 0 1 0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0271 -0.0270 463 450 463 450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0093 -0.0093 453 449 453 449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7280 -0.7280 13 4 13 4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0065 -0.0065 569 565 569 565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0077 -0.0077 569 564 569 564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0077 +1.0068 2 5 2 5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0220 0.0199 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0006 +0.0007 312 312 312 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0031 +0.0032 311 312 311 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7069 -0.7072 4 1 4 1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0015 -0.0015 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0010 -0.0011 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1486 -0.1456 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6139 0.8766 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0008 -0.0005 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0006 -0.0002 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1467 -0.1390 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0137 0.0137 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0002 +0.0002 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0015 -0.0014 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +3.3687 +3.3587 0 2 0 2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.4041 0.3933 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0004 +0.0004 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0000 -0.0000 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1947 +0.1995 0 0 0 0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0074 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0092 +0.0074 547 542 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0054 +0.0115 544 541 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4086 -0.3486 8 5 0 0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.3320 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0015 +0.0204 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0001 +0.0203 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2259 +0.2023 1 1 0 0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0209 -0.0179 96 94 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0182 -0.0155 95 93 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.6164 -0.2703 2 1 2 1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0098 -0.0098 176 175 176 175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0126 -0.0126 176 174 176 174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev +6.9789 +6.9157 0 2 0 2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0237 -0.0238 474 463 474 463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0267 -0.0267 473 461 473 461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.7179 +0.7178 3 5 3 5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6837 0.6554 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0014 -0.0013 1375 1373 1375 1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0018 +0.0019 1371 1374 1371 1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7457 -0.7382 11 3 10 3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0080 -0.0289 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0070 -0.0287 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0977 +0.6614 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0132 +0.0967 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0132 +0.0956 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0407 -0.1695 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0331 +0.1307 13 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0430 +0.1373 12 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.9006 -0.8847 1 0 0 0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0016 0.0010 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0023 -0.0024 395 394 395 394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0029 -0.0030 395 394 395 393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0275 -0.0375 1 1 1 1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0232 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0047 +0.0039 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0050 +0.0037 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0599 -0.2683 1 1 0 0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0206 +0.0207 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0204 +0.0205 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2155 +0.2212 1 1 1 1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0109 -0.0108 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0104 -0.0103 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4919 -0.4800 0 0 0 0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0149 -0.0147 220 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0173 -0.0169 221 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0337 +1.0341 1 3 1 3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0001 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0019 -0.0019 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0021 -0.0021 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4441 -0.4282 0 0 0 0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.4263 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0258 -0.0006 81 83 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0235 -0.0011 81 82 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1634 +0.1070 1 1 0 0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.
llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779
llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-28 04:46:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm1, %ymm2 # sched: [5:2.00]
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfnmaddps %ymm3, %ymm2, %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
* All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
* Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...
To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!
# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark Time CPU Time Old Time New CPU Old CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0607 -0.0604 234 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0630 -0.0626 233 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2581 +0.2587 1 2 1 2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0770 -0.0767 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0767 -0.0763 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4170 -0.4156 1 0 1 0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0271 -0.0270 463 450 463 450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0093 -0.0093 453 449 453 449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7280 -0.7280 13 4 13 4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0065 -0.0065 569 565 569 565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0077 -0.0077 569 564 569 564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0077 +1.0068 2 5 2 5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0220 0.0199 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0006 +0.0007 312 312 312 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0031 +0.0032 311 312 311 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7069 -0.7072 4 1 4 1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0015 -0.0015 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0010 -0.0011 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1486 -0.1456 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6139 0.8766 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0008 -0.0005 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0006 -0.0002 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1467 -0.1390 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0137 0.0137 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0002 +0.0002 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0015 -0.0014 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +3.3687 +3.3587 0 2 0 2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.4041 0.3933 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0004 +0.0004 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0000 -0.0000 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1947 +0.1995 0 0 0 0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0074 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0092 +0.0074 547 542 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0054 +0.0115 544 541 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4086 -0.3486 8 5 0 0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.3320 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0015 +0.0204 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0001 +0.0203 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2259 +0.2023 1 1 0 0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0209 -0.0179 96 94 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0182 -0.0155 95 93 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.6164 -0.2703 2 1 2 1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0098 -0.0098 176 175 176 175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0126 -0.0126 176 174 176 174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev +6.9789 +6.9157 0 2 0 2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0237 -0.0238 474 463 474 463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0267 -0.0267 473 461 473 461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.7179 +0.7178 3 5 3 5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6837 0.6554 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0014 -0.0013 1375 1373 1375 1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0018 +0.0019 1371 1374 1371 1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7457 -0.7382 11 3 10 3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0080 -0.0289 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0070 -0.0287 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0977 +0.6614 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0132 +0.0967 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0132 +0.0956 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0407 -0.1695 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0331 +0.1307 13 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0430 +0.1373 12 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.9006 -0.8847 1 0 0 0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0016 0.0010 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0023 -0.0024 395 394 395 394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0029 -0.0030 395 394 395 393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0275 -0.0375 1 1 1 1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0232 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0047 +0.0039 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0050 +0.0037 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0599 -0.2683 1 1 0 0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0206 +0.0207 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0204 +0.0205 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2155 +0.2212 1 1 1 1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0109 -0.0108 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0104 -0.0103 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4919 -0.4800 0 0 0 0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0149 -0.0147 220 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0173 -0.0169 221 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0337 +1.0341 1 3 1 3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0001 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0019 -0.0019 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0021 -0.0021 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4441 -0.4282 0 0 0 0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.4263 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0258 -0.0006 81 83 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0235 -0.0011 81 82 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1634 +0.1070 1 1 0 0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.
llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779
llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-28 04:46:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm3 # sched: [10:2.00]
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfmaddps %ymm2, %ymm1, %ymm2, %ymm1 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
* All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
* Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...
To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!
# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark Time CPU Time Old Time New CPU Old CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0607 -0.0604 234 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0630 -0.0626 233 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2581 +0.2587 1 2 1 2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0770 -0.0767 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0767 -0.0763 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4170 -0.4156 1 0 1 0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0271 -0.0270 463 450 463 450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0093 -0.0093 453 449 453 449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7280 -0.7280 13 4 13 4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0065 -0.0065 569 565 569 565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0077 -0.0077 569 564 569 564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0077 +1.0068 2 5 2 5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0220 0.0199 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0006 +0.0007 312 312 312 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0031 +0.0032 311 312 311 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7069 -0.7072 4 1 4 1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0015 -0.0015 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0010 -0.0011 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1486 -0.1456 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6139 0.8766 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0008 -0.0005 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0006 -0.0002 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1467 -0.1390 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0137 0.0137 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0002 +0.0002 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0015 -0.0014 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +3.3687 +3.3587 0 2 0 2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.4041 0.3933 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0004 +0.0004 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0000 -0.0000 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1947 +0.1995 0 0 0 0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0074 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0092 +0.0074 547 542 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0054 +0.0115 544 541 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4086 -0.3486 8 5 0 0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.3320 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0015 +0.0204 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0001 +0.0203 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2259 +0.2023 1 1 0 0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0209 -0.0179 96 94 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0182 -0.0155 95 93 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.6164 -0.2703 2 1 2 1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0098 -0.0098 176 175 176 175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0126 -0.0126 176 174 176 174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev +6.9789 +6.9157 0 2 0 2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0237 -0.0238 474 463 474 463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0267 -0.0267 473 461 473 461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.7179 +0.7178 3 5 3 5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6837 0.6554 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0014 -0.0013 1375 1373 1375 1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0018 +0.0019 1371 1374 1371 1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7457 -0.7382 11 3 10 3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0080 -0.0289 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0070 -0.0287 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0977 +0.6614 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0132 +0.0967 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0132 +0.0956 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0407 -0.1695 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0331 +0.1307 13 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0430 +0.1373 12 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.9006 -0.8847 1 0 0 0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0016 0.0010 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0023 -0.0024 395 394 395 394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0029 -0.0030 395 394 395 393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0275 -0.0375 1 1 1 1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0232 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0047 +0.0039 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0050 +0.0037 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0599 -0.2683 1 1 0 0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0206 +0.0207 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0204 +0.0205 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2155 +0.2212 1 1 1 1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0109 -0.0108 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0104 -0.0103 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4919 -0.4800 0 0 0 0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0149 -0.0147 220 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0173 -0.0169 221 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0337 +1.0341 1 3 1 3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0001 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0019 -0.0019 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0021 -0.0021 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4441 -0.4282 0 0 0 0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.4263 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0258 -0.0006 81 83 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0235 -0.0011 81 82 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1634 +0.1070 1 1 0 0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.
llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779
llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-28 04:46:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm1, %ymm2 # sched: [10:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm3, %ymm0 # sched: [5:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vmulps %ymm1, %ymm2, %ymm1 # sched: [5:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-LABEL: v16f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2: # %bb.0:
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmovaps {{.*#+}} ymm3 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm2 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps %ymm2, %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vsubps %ymm0, %ymm3, %ymm0 # sched: [3:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm2, %ymm0 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vaddps %ymm0, %ymm2, %ymm0 # sched: [3:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm1, %ymm2 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps %ymm2, %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vsubps %ymm1, %ymm3, %ymm1 # sched: [3:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm3 # sched: [7:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps %ymm1, %ymm2, %ymm1 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vaddps %ymm1, %ymm2, %ymm1 # sched: [3:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm1, %ymm2 # sched: [7:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm3, %ymm0 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps %ymm1, %ymm2, %ymm1 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-LABEL: v16f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
|
|
|
; SANDY: # %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm2 # sched: [7:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps %ymm2, %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmovaps {{.*#+}} ymm3 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [7:0.50]
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vsubps %ymm0, %ymm3, %ymm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm1, %ymm4 # sched: [7:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm2, %ymm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vaddps %ymm0, %ymm2, %ymm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps %ymm4, %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vsubps %ymm1, %ymm3, %ymm1 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps %ymm1, %ymm4, %ymm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vaddps %ymm1, %ymm4, %ymm1 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm1, %ymm2 # sched: [12:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm3 # sched: [12:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm3, %ymm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps %ymm1, %ymm2, %ymm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-LABEL: v16f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL: # %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm2 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vbroadcastss {{.*#+}} ymm3 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [7:0.50]
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} ymm0 = -(ymm2 * ymm0) + ymm3 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} ymm0 = (ymm0 * ymm2) + ymm2 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm1, %ymm2 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} ymm1 = -(ymm2 * ymm1) + ymm3 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} ymm1 = (ymm1 * ymm2) + ymm2 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm1, %ymm2 # sched: [12:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm3 # sched: [12:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm3, %ymm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vmulps %ymm1, %ymm2, %ymm1 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-LABEL: v16f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA: # %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm2 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps %ymm2, %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vbroadcastss {{.*#+}} ymm3 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [7:0.50]
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vsubps %ymm0, %ymm3, %ymm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm1, %ymm4 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm2, %ymm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vaddps %ymm0, %ymm2, %ymm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps %ymm4, %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vsubps %ymm1, %ymm3, %ymm1 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps %ymm1, %ymm4, %ymm1 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vaddps %ymm1, %ymm4, %ymm1 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm1, %ymm2 # sched: [12:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm3 # sched: [12:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm3, %ymm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps %ymm1, %ymm2, %ymm1 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; KNL-LABEL: v16f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
|
|
|
; KNL: # %bb.0:
|
2018-05-07 19:50:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vrcp14ps %zmm0, %zmm1 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
2018-05-07 01:48:21 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} zmm0 = -(zmm1 * zmm0) + mem sched: [12:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} zmm0 = (zmm0 * zmm1) + zmm1 sched: [5:0.50]
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %zmm0, %zmm1 # sched: [12:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vmulps %zmm0, %zmm1, %zmm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SKX-LABEL: v16f32_one_step_2_divs:
|
|
|
|
; SKX: # %bb.0:
|
2018-06-11 22:37:53 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vrcp14ps %zmm0, %zmm1 # sched: [4:2.00]
|
2018-05-07 01:48:21 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} zmm0 = -(zmm1 * zmm0) + mem sched: [11:0.50]
|
2018-06-11 22:37:53 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} zmm0 = (zmm0 * zmm1) + zmm1 sched: [4:0.50]
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %zmm0, %zmm1 # sched: [11:0.50]
|
2018-06-11 22:37:53 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vmulps %zmm0, %zmm1, %zmm0 # sched: [4:0.50]
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
|
|
|
%div = fdiv fast <16 x float> <float 1.0, float 2.0, float 3.0, float 4.0, float 5.0, float 6.0, float 7.0, float 8.0, float 9.0, float 10.0, float 11.0, float 12.0, float 13.0, float 14.0, float 15.0, float 16.0>, %x
|
|
|
|
%div2 = fdiv fast <16 x float> %div, %x
|
|
|
|
ret <16 x float> %div2
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define <16 x float> @v16f32_two_step2(<16 x float> %x) #2 {
|
|
|
|
; SSE-LABEL: v16f32_two_step2:
|
|
|
|
; SSE: # %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm3, %xmm6
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm2, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm0, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: rcpps %xmm3, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm2, %xmm3
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0]
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm0, %xmm7
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: subps %xmm3, %xmm7
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm2, %xmm7
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: addps %xmm2, %xmm7
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm7, %xmm6
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm0, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: subps %xmm6, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm7, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: addps %xmm7, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: rcpps %xmm5, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm5, %xmm6
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm2, %xmm6
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm0, %xmm7
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: subps %xmm6, %xmm7
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm2, %xmm7
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: addps %xmm2, %xmm7
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm7, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm0, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: subps %xmm5, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm7, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: addps %xmm7, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: rcpps %xmm1, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm1, %xmm6
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm5, %xmm6
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm0, %xmm7
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: subps %xmm6, %xmm7
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm5, %xmm7
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: addps %xmm5, %xmm7
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm7, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm0, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: subps %xmm1, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm7, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: addps %xmm7, %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: rcpps %xmm4, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm4, %xmm6
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm1, %xmm6
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm0, %xmm7
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: subps %xmm6, %xmm7
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm1, %xmm7
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: addps %xmm1, %xmm7
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm7, %xmm4
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: subps %xmm4, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps %xmm7, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: addps %xmm7, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm5
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: movaps %xmm5, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-LABEL: v16f32_two_step2:
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP: # %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm1, %ymm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %ymm2, %ymm1, %ymm3
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmovaps {{.*#+}} ymm4 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0]
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vsubps %ymm3, %ymm4, %ymm3
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %ymm3, %ymm2, %ymm3
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vaddps %ymm3, %ymm2, %ymm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %ymm2, %ymm1, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vsubps %ymm1, %ymm4, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %ymm1, %ymm2, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vaddps %ymm1, %ymm2, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %ymm2, %ymm0, %ymm3
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vsubps %ymm3, %ymm4, %ymm3
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %ymm3, %ymm2, %ymm3
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vaddps %ymm3, %ymm2, %ymm2
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %ymm2, %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vsubps %ymm0, %ymm4, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm2, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vaddps %ymm0, %ymm2, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm1, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-LABEL: v16f32_two_step2:
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP: # %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm1, %ymm2
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vmovaps {{.*#+}} ymm3 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0]
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vmovaps %ymm2, %ymm4
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} ymm4 = -(ymm1 * ymm4) + ymm3
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} ymm4 = (ymm4 * ymm2) + ymm2
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} ymm1 = -(ymm4 * ymm1) + ymm3
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} ymm1 = (ymm1 * ymm4) + ymm4
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm2
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vmovaps %ymm2, %ymm4
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} ymm4 = -(ymm0 * ymm4) + ymm3
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} ymm4 = (ymm4 * ymm2) + ymm2
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} ymm0 = -(ymm4 * ymm0) + ymm3
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} ymm0 = (ymm0 * ymm4) + ymm4
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm1, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-LABEL: v16f32_two_step2:
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2: # %bb.0:
|
AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
* All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
* Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...
To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!
# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark Time CPU Time Old Time New CPU Old CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0607 -0.0604 234 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0630 -0.0626 233 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2581 +0.2587 1 2 1 2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0770 -0.0767 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0767 -0.0763 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4170 -0.4156 1 0 1 0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0271 -0.0270 463 450 463 450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0093 -0.0093 453 449 453 449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7280 -0.7280 13 4 13 4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0065 -0.0065 569 565 569 565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0077 -0.0077 569 564 569 564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0077 +1.0068 2 5 2 5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0220 0.0199 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0006 +0.0007 312 312 312 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0031 +0.0032 311 312 311 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7069 -0.7072 4 1 4 1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0015 -0.0015 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0010 -0.0011 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1486 -0.1456 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6139 0.8766 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0008 -0.0005 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0006 -0.0002 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1467 -0.1390 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0137 0.0137 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0002 +0.0002 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0015 -0.0014 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +3.3687 +3.3587 0 2 0 2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.4041 0.3933 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0004 +0.0004 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0000 -0.0000 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1947 +0.1995 0 0 0 0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0074 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0092 +0.0074 547 542 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0054 +0.0115 544 541 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4086 -0.3486 8 5 0 0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.3320 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0015 +0.0204 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0001 +0.0203 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2259 +0.2023 1 1 0 0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0209 -0.0179 96 94 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0182 -0.0155 95 93 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.6164 -0.2703 2 1 2 1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0098 -0.0098 176 175 176 175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0126 -0.0126 176 174 176 174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev +6.9789 +6.9157 0 2 0 2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0237 -0.0238 474 463 474 463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0267 -0.0267 473 461 473 461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.7179 +0.7178 3 5 3 5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6837 0.6554 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0014 -0.0013 1375 1373 1375 1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0018 +0.0019 1371 1374 1371 1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7457 -0.7382 11 3 10 3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0080 -0.0289 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0070 -0.0287 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0977 +0.6614 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0132 +0.0967 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0132 +0.0956 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0407 -0.1695 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0331 +0.1307 13 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0430 +0.1373 12 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.9006 -0.8847 1 0 0 0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0016 0.0010 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0023 -0.0024 395 394 395 394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0029 -0.0030 395 394 395 393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0275 -0.0375 1 1 1 1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0232 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0047 +0.0039 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0050 +0.0037 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0599 -0.2683 1 1 0 0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0206 +0.0207 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0204 +0.0205 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2155 +0.2212 1 1 1 1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0109 -0.0108 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0104 -0.0103 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4919 -0.4800 0 0 0 0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0149 -0.0147 220 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0173 -0.0169 221 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0337 +1.0341 1 3 1 3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0001 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0019 -0.0019 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0021 -0.0021 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4441 -0.4282 0 0 0 0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.4263 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0258 -0.0006 81 83 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0235 -0.0011 81 82 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1634 +0.1070 1 1 0 0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.
llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779
llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-28 04:46:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm1, %ymm2 # sched: [5:2.00]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vmovaps {{.*#+}} ymm3 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [5:0.50]
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfnmaddps %ymm3, %ymm2, %ymm1, %ymm4 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfmaddps %ymm2, %ymm4, %ymm2, %ymm2 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfnmaddps %ymm3, %ymm2, %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfmaddps %ymm2, %ymm1, %ymm2, %ymm1 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
* All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
* Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...
To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!
# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark Time CPU Time Old Time New CPU Old CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0607 -0.0604 234 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0630 -0.0626 233 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2581 +0.2587 1 2 1 2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0770 -0.0767 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0767 -0.0763 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4170 -0.4156 1 0 1 0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0271 -0.0270 463 450 463 450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0093 -0.0093 453 449 453 449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7280 -0.7280 13 4 13 4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0065 -0.0065 569 565 569 565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0077 -0.0077 569 564 569 564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0077 +1.0068 2 5 2 5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0220 0.0199 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0006 +0.0007 312 312 312 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0031 +0.0032 311 312 311 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7069 -0.7072 4 1 4 1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0015 -0.0015 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0010 -0.0011 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1486 -0.1456 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6139 0.8766 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0008 -0.0005 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0006 -0.0002 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1467 -0.1390 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0137 0.0137 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0002 +0.0002 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0015 -0.0014 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +3.3687 +3.3587 0 2 0 2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.4041 0.3933 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0004 +0.0004 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0000 -0.0000 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1947 +0.1995 0 0 0 0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0074 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0092 +0.0074 547 542 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0054 +0.0115 544 541 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4086 -0.3486 8 5 0 0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.3320 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0015 +0.0204 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0001 +0.0203 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2259 +0.2023 1 1 0 0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0209 -0.0179 96 94 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0182 -0.0155 95 93 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.6164 -0.2703 2 1 2 1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0098 -0.0098 176 175 176 175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0126 -0.0126 176 174 176 174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev +6.9789 +6.9157 0 2 0 2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0237 -0.0238 474 463 474 463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0267 -0.0267 473 461 473 461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.7179 +0.7178 3 5 3 5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6837 0.6554 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0014 -0.0013 1375 1373 1375 1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0018 +0.0019 1371 1374 1371 1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7457 -0.7382 11 3 10 3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0080 -0.0289 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0070 -0.0287 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0977 +0.6614 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0132 +0.0967 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0132 +0.0956 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0407 -0.1695 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0331 +0.1307 13 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0430 +0.1373 12 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.9006 -0.8847 1 0 0 0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0016 0.0010 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0023 -0.0024 395 394 395 394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0029 -0.0030 395 394 395 393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0275 -0.0375 1 1 1 1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0232 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0047 +0.0039 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0050 +0.0037 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0599 -0.2683 1 1 0 0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0206 +0.0207 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0204 +0.0205 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2155 +0.2212 1 1 1 1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0109 -0.0108 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0104 -0.0103 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4919 -0.4800 0 0 0 0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0149 -0.0147 220 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0173 -0.0169 221 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0337 +1.0341 1 3 1 3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0001 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0019 -0.0019 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0021 -0.0021 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4441 -0.4282 0 0 0 0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.4263 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0258 -0.0006 81 83 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0235 -0.0011 81 82 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1634 +0.1070 1 1 0 0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.
llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779
llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-28 04:46:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm2 # sched: [5:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [10:2.00]
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfnmaddps %ymm3, %ymm2, %ymm0, %ymm4 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfmaddps %ymm2, %ymm4, %ymm2, %ymm2 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfnmaddps %ymm3, %ymm2, %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vfmaddps %ymm2, %ymm0, %ymm2, %ymm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
* All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
* Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...
To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!
# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark Time CPU Time Old Time New CPU Old CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0607 -0.0604 234 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0630 -0.0626 233 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2581 +0.2587 1 2 1 2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0770 -0.0767 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0767 -0.0763 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4170 -0.4156 1 0 1 0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0271 -0.0270 463 450 463 450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0093 -0.0093 453 449 453 449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7280 -0.7280 13 4 13 4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0065 -0.0065 569 565 569 565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0077 -0.0077 569 564 569 564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0077 +1.0068 2 5 2 5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0220 0.0199 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0006 +0.0007 312 312 312 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0031 +0.0032 311 312 311 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7069 -0.7072 4 1 4 1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0015 -0.0015 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0010 -0.0011 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1486 -0.1456 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6139 0.8766 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0008 -0.0005 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0006 -0.0002 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1467 -0.1390 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0137 0.0137 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0002 +0.0002 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0015 -0.0014 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +3.3687 +3.3587 0 2 0 2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.4041 0.3933 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0004 +0.0004 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0000 -0.0000 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1947 +0.1995 0 0 0 0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0074 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0092 +0.0074 547 542 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0054 +0.0115 544 541 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4086 -0.3486 8 5 0 0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.3320 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0015 +0.0204 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0001 +0.0203 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2259 +0.2023 1 1 0 0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0209 -0.0179 96 94 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0182 -0.0155 95 93 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.6164 -0.2703 2 1 2 1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0098 -0.0098 176 175 176 175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0126 -0.0126 176 174 176 174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev +6.9789 +6.9157 0 2 0 2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0237 -0.0238 474 463 474 463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0267 -0.0267 473 461 473 461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.7179 +0.7178 3 5 3 5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6837 0.6554 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0014 -0.0013 1375 1373 1375 1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0018 +0.0019 1371 1374 1371 1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7457 -0.7382 11 3 10 3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0080 -0.0289 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0070 -0.0287 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0977 +0.6614 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0132 +0.0967 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0132 +0.0956 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0407 -0.1695 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0331 +0.1307 13 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0430 +0.1373 12 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.9006 -0.8847 1 0 0 0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0016 0.0010 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0023 -0.0024 395 394 395 394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0029 -0.0030 395 394 395 393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0275 -0.0375 1 1 1 1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0232 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0047 +0.0039 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0050 +0.0037 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0599 -0.2683 1 1 0 0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0206 +0.0207 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0204 +0.0205 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2155 +0.2212 1 1 1 1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0109 -0.0108 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0104 -0.0103 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4919 -0.4800 0 0 0 0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0149 -0.0147 220 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0173 -0.0169 221 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0337 +1.0341 1 3 1 3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0001 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0019 -0.0019 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0021 -0.0021 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4441 -0.4282 0 0 0 0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.4263 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0258 -0.0006 81 83 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0235 -0.0011 81 82 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1634 +0.1070 1 1 0 0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.
llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779
llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-28 04:46:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [10:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-LABEL: v16f32_two_step2:
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2: # %bb.0:
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmovaps {{.*#+}} ymm4 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm1, %ymm2 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps %ymm2, %ymm1, %ymm3 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vsubps %ymm3, %ymm4, %ymm3 # sched: [3:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps %ymm3, %ymm2, %ymm3 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vaddps %ymm3, %ymm2, %ymm2 # sched: [3:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps %ymm2, %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vsubps %ymm1, %ymm4, %ymm1 # sched: [3:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps %ymm1, %ymm2, %ymm1 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vaddps %ymm1, %ymm2, %ymm1 # sched: [3:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm2 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [7:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps %ymm2, %ymm0, %ymm3 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vsubps %ymm3, %ymm4, %ymm3 # sched: [3:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps %ymm3, %ymm2, %ymm3 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vaddps %ymm3, %ymm2, %ymm2 # sched: [3:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps %ymm2, %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vsubps %ymm0, %ymm4, %ymm0 # sched: [3:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm2, %ymm0 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vaddps %ymm0, %ymm2, %ymm0 # sched: [3:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [7:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-LABEL: v16f32_two_step2:
|
|
|
|
; SANDY: # %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm1, %ymm2 # sched: [7:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps %ymm2, %ymm1, %ymm3 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmovaps {{.*#+}} ymm4 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [7:0.50]
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vsubps %ymm3, %ymm4, %ymm3 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps %ymm3, %ymm2, %ymm3 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vaddps %ymm3, %ymm2, %ymm2 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps %ymm2, %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vsubps %ymm1, %ymm4, %ymm1 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps %ymm1, %ymm2, %ymm1 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vaddps %ymm1, %ymm2, %ymm1 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm2 # sched: [7:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps %ymm2, %ymm0, %ymm3 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vsubps %ymm3, %ymm4, %ymm3 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps %ymm3, %ymm2, %ymm3 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vaddps %ymm3, %ymm2, %ymm2 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps %ymm2, %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vsubps %ymm0, %ymm4, %ymm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm2, %ymm0 # sched: [5:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vaddps %ymm0, %ymm2, %ymm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [12:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [12:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-LABEL: v16f32_two_step2:
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL: # %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm1, %ymm2 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vbroadcastss {{.*#+}} ymm3 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [7:0.50]
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vmovaps %ymm2, %ymm4 # sched: [1:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} ymm4 = -(ymm1 * ymm4) + ymm3 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} ymm4 = (ymm4 * ymm2) + ymm2 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} ymm1 = -(ymm4 * ymm1) + ymm3 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} ymm1 = (ymm1 * ymm4) + ymm4 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm2 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vmovaps %ymm2, %ymm4 # sched: [1:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} ymm4 = -(ymm0 * ymm4) + ymm3 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} ymm4 = (ymm4 * ymm2) + ymm2 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} ymm0 = -(ymm4 * ymm0) + ymm3 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} ymm0 = (ymm0 * ymm4) + ymm4 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [12:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [12:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-LABEL: v16f32_two_step2:
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA: # %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm1, %ymm2 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps %ymm2, %ymm1, %ymm3 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vbroadcastss {{.*#+}} ymm4 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [7:0.50]
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vsubps %ymm3, %ymm4, %ymm3 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps %ymm3, %ymm2, %ymm3 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vaddps %ymm3, %ymm2, %ymm2 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps %ymm2, %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vsubps %ymm1, %ymm4, %ymm1 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps %ymm1, %ymm2, %ymm1 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vaddps %ymm1, %ymm2, %ymm1 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm2 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps %ymm2, %ymm0, %ymm3 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vsubps %ymm3, %ymm4, %ymm3 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps %ymm3, %ymm2, %ymm3 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vaddps %ymm3, %ymm2, %ymm2 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps %ymm2, %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vsubps %ymm0, %ymm4, %ymm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps %ymm0, %ymm2, %ymm0 # sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vaddps %ymm0, %ymm2, %ymm0 # sched: [3:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [12:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [12:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; KNL-LABEL: v16f32_two_step2:
|
|
|
|
; KNL: # %bb.0:
|
2018-05-07 19:50:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vrcp14ps %zmm0, %zmm1 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vbroadcastss {{.*#+}} zmm2 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [10:1.00]
|
2018-05-07 01:48:21 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vmovaps %zmm1, %zmm3 # sched: [1:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} zmm3 = -(zmm0 * zmm3) + zmm2 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} zmm3 = (zmm3 * zmm1) + zmm1 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} zmm0 = -(zmm3 * zmm0) + zmm2 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} zmm0 = (zmm0 * zmm3) + zmm3 sched: [5:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %zmm0, %zmm0 # sched: [12:0.50]
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SKX-LABEL: v16f32_two_step2:
|
|
|
|
; SKX: # %bb.0:
|
2018-06-11 22:37:53 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vrcp14ps %zmm0, %zmm1 # sched: [4:2.00]
|
2018-10-29 12:52:04 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vbroadcastss {{.*#+}} zmm2 = [1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0,1.0E+0] sched: [8:0.50]
|
2018-05-07 01:48:21 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vmovaps %zmm1, %zmm3 # sched: [1:0.33]
|
2018-06-11 22:37:53 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} zmm3 = -(zmm0 * zmm3) + zmm2 sched: [4:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} zmm3 = (zmm3 * zmm1) + zmm1 sched: [4:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vfnmadd213ps {{.*#+}} zmm0 = -(zmm3 * zmm0) + zmm2 sched: [4:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vfmadd132ps {{.*#+}} zmm0 = (zmm0 * zmm3) + zmm3 sched: [4:0.50]
|
2018-05-07 01:48:21 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %zmm0, %zmm0 # sched: [11:0.50]
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
|
|
|
%div = fdiv fast <16 x float> <float 1.0, float 2.0, float 3.0, float 4.0, float 5.0, float 6.0, float 7.0, float 8.0, float 9.0, float 10.0, float 11.0, float 12.0, float 13.0, float 14.0, float 15.0, float 16.0>, %x
|
|
|
|
ret <16 x float> %div
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define <16 x float> @v16f32_no_step(<16 x float> %x) #3 {
|
|
|
|
; SSE-LABEL: v16f32_no_step:
|
|
|
|
; SSE: # %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: rcpps %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: rcpps %xmm1, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: rcpps %xmm2, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: rcpps %xmm3, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-LABEL: v16f32_no_step:
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP: # %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm1, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-LABEL: v16f32_no_step:
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP: # %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm1, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-LABEL: v16f32_no_step:
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2: # %bb.0:
|
AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
* All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
* Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...
To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!
# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark Time CPU Time Old Time New CPU Old CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0607 -0.0604 234 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0630 -0.0626 233 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2581 +0.2587 1 2 1 2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0770 -0.0767 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0767 -0.0763 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4170 -0.4156 1 0 1 0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0271 -0.0270 463 450 463 450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0093 -0.0093 453 449 453 449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7280 -0.7280 13 4 13 4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0065 -0.0065 569 565 569 565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0077 -0.0077 569 564 569 564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0077 +1.0068 2 5 2 5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0220 0.0199 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0006 +0.0007 312 312 312 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0031 +0.0032 311 312 311 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7069 -0.7072 4 1 4 1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0015 -0.0015 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0010 -0.0011 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1486 -0.1456 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6139 0.8766 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0008 -0.0005 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0006 -0.0002 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1467 -0.1390 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0137 0.0137 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0002 +0.0002 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0015 -0.0014 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +3.3687 +3.3587 0 2 0 2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.4041 0.3933 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0004 +0.0004 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0000 -0.0000 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1947 +0.1995 0 0 0 0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0074 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0092 +0.0074 547 542 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0054 +0.0115 544 541 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4086 -0.3486 8 5 0 0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.3320 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0015 +0.0204 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0001 +0.0203 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2259 +0.2023 1 1 0 0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0209 -0.0179 96 94 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0182 -0.0155 95 93 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.6164 -0.2703 2 1 2 1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0098 -0.0098 176 175 176 175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0126 -0.0126 176 174 176 174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev +6.9789 +6.9157 0 2 0 2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0237 -0.0238 474 463 474 463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0267 -0.0267 473 461 473 461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.7179 +0.7178 3 5 3 5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6837 0.6554 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0014 -0.0013 1375 1373 1375 1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0018 +0.0019 1371 1374 1371 1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7457 -0.7382 11 3 10 3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0080 -0.0289 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0070 -0.0287 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0977 +0.6614 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0132 +0.0967 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0132 +0.0956 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0407 -0.1695 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0331 +0.1307 13 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0430 +0.1373 12 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.9006 -0.8847 1 0 0 0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0016 0.0010 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0023 -0.0024 395 394 395 394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0029 -0.0030 395 394 395 393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0275 -0.0375 1 1 1 1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0232 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0047 +0.0039 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0050 +0.0037 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0599 -0.2683 1 1 0 0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0206 +0.0207 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0204 +0.0205 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2155 +0.2212 1 1 1 1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0109 -0.0108 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0104 -0.0103 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4919 -0.4800 0 0 0 0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0149 -0.0147 220 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0173 -0.0169 221 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0337 +1.0341 1 3 1 3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0001 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0019 -0.0019 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0021 -0.0021 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4441 -0.4282 0 0 0 0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.4263 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0258 -0.0006 81 83 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0235 -0.0011 81 82 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1634 +0.1070 1 1 0 0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.
llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779
llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-28 04:46:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [5:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [5:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-LABEL: v16f32_no_step:
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2: # %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-LABEL: v16f32_no_step:
|
|
|
|
; SANDY: # %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [7:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [7:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-LABEL: v16f32_no_step:
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL: # %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-LABEL: v16f32_no_step:
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA: # %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; KNL-LABEL: v16f32_no_step:
|
|
|
|
; KNL: # %bb.0:
|
2018-05-07 19:50:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vrcp14ps %zmm0, %zmm0 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SKX-LABEL: v16f32_no_step:
|
|
|
|
; SKX: # %bb.0:
|
2018-06-11 22:37:53 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vrcp14ps %zmm0, %zmm0 # sched: [4:2.00]
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
|
|
|
%div = fdiv fast <16 x float> <float 1.0, float 1.0, float 1.0, float 1.0, float 1.0, float 1.0, float 1.0, float 1.0, float 1.0, float 1.0, float 1.0, float 1.0, float 1.0, float 1.0, float 1.0, float 1.0>, %x
|
|
|
|
ret <16 x float> %div
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
define <16 x float> @v16f32_no_step2(<16 x float> %x) #3 {
|
|
|
|
; SSE-LABEL: v16f32_no_step2:
|
|
|
|
; SSE: # %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: rcpps %xmm3, %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: rcpps %xmm2, %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: rcpps %xmm1, %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: rcpps %xmm0, %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm0
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm1
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm2
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: mulps {{.*}}(%rip), %xmm3
|
|
|
|
; SSE-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-LABEL: v16f32_no_step2:
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP: # %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm1, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm1, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; AVX-RECIP-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-LABEL: v16f32_no_step2:
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP: # %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm1, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm1, %ymm1
|
|
|
|
; FMA-RECIP-NEXT: retq
|
|
|
|
;
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-LABEL: v16f32_no_step2:
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2: # %bb.0:
|
AMD BdVer2 (Piledriver) Initial Scheduler model
Summary:
# Overview
This is somewhat partial.
* Latencies are good {F7371125}
* All of these remaining inconsistencies //appear// to be noise/noisy/flaky.
* NumMicroOps are somewhat good {F7371158}
* Most of the remaining inconsistencies are from `Ld` / `Ld_ReadAfterLd` classes
* Actual unit occupation (pipes, `ResourceCycles`) are undiscovered lands, i did not really look there.
They are basically verbatum copy from `btver2`
* Many `InstRW`. And there are still inconsistencies left...
To be noted:
I think this is the first new schedule profile produced with the new next-gen tools like llvm-exegesis!
# Benchmark
I realize that isn't what was suggested, but i'll start with some "internal" public real-world benchmark i understand - [[ https://github.com/darktable-org/rawspeed | RawSpeed raw image decoding library ]].
Diff (the exact clang from trunk without/with this patch):
```
Comparing /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-old/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench to /home/lebedevri/rawspeed/build-new/src/utilities/rsbench/rsbench
Benchmark Time CPU Time Old Time New CPU Old CPU New
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0607 -0.0604 234 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0630 -0.0626 233 219 233 219
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/09.canon.sraw1.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2581 +0.2587 1 2 1 2
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0770 -0.0767 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0767 -0.0763 144 133 144 133
Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4170 -0.4156 1 0 1 0
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0271 -0.0270 463 450 463 450
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0093 -0.0093 453 449 453 449
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9927.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7280 -0.7280 13 4 13 4
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0065 -0.0065 569 565 569 565
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0077 -0.0077 569 564 569 564
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9928.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0077 +1.0068 2 5 2 5
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0220 0.0199 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0006 +0.0007 312 312 312 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0031 +0.0032 311 312 311 312
Canon/EOS 5DS/2K4A9929.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7069 -0.7072 4 1 4 1
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0004 0.0004 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0015 -0.0015 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0010 -0.0011 141 141 141 141
Canon/EOS 10D/CRW_7673.CRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1486 -0.1456 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6139 0.8766 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0008 -0.0005 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0006 -0.0002 60 60 60 60
Canon/EOS 40D/_MG_0154.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.1467 -0.1390 0 0 0 0
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0137 0.0137 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0002 +0.0002 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0015 -0.0014 275 275 275 275
Canon/EOS 77D/IMG_4049.CR2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +3.3687 +3.3587 0 2 0 2
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.4041 0.3933 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0004 +0.0004 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0000 -0.0000 67 67 67 67
Canon/PowerShot G1/crw_1693.crw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1947 +0.1995 0 0 0 0
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0074 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0092 +0.0074 547 542 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0054 +0.0115 544 541 25 25
Fujifilm/GFX 50S/20170525_0037TEST.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4086 -0.3486 8 5 0 0
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.3320 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0015 +0.0204 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0001 +0.0203 218 218 12 12
Fujifilm/X-Pro2/_DSF3051.RAF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2259 +0.2023 1 1 0 0
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0209 -0.0179 96 94 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0182 -0.0155 95 93 90 88
GoPro/HERO6 Black/GOPR9172.GPR/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.6164 -0.2703 2 1 2 1
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0098 -0.0098 176 175 176 175
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0126 -0.0126 176 174 176 174
Kodak/DCS Pro 14nx/D7465857.DCR/threads:8/real_time_stddev +6.9789 +6.9157 0 2 0 2
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0237 -0.0238 474 463 474 463
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0267 -0.0267 473 461 473 461
Nikon/D850/Nikon-D850-14bit-lossless-compressed.NEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.7179 +0.7178 3 5 3 5
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.6837 0.6554 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0014 -0.0013 1375 1373 1375 1373
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0018 +0.0019 1371 1374 1371 1374
Olympus/E-M1MarkII/Olympus_EM1mk2__HIRES_50MP.ORF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.7457 -0.7382 11 3 10 3
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0080 -0.0289 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0070 -0.0287 22 22 10 10
Panasonic/DC-G9/P1000476.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0977 +0.6614 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0132 +0.0967 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0132 +0.0956 35 36 10 11
Panasonic/DC-GH5/_T012014.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0407 -0.1695 0 0 0 0
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0331 +0.1307 13 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0430 +0.1373 12 13 6 6
Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.9006 -0.8847 1 0 0 0
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0016 0.0010 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0023 -0.0024 395 394 395 394
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0029 -0.0030 395 394 395 393
Pentax/645Z/IMGP2837.PEF/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0275 -0.0375 1 1 1 1
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0232 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0047 +0.0039 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0050 +0.0037 114 113 28 28
Phase One/P65/CF027310.IIQ/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.0599 -0.2683 1 1 0 0
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0206 +0.0207 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0204 +0.0205 405 414 405 414
Samsung/NX1/2016-07-23-142101_sam_9364.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.2155 +0.2212 1 1 1 1
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0109 -0.0108 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0104 -0.0103 147 145 147 145
Samsung/NX30/2015-03-07-163604_sam_7204.srw/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4919 -0.4800 0 0 0 0
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.0000 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0149 -0.0147 220 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0173 -0.0169 221 217 220 217
Samsung/NX3000/_3184416.SRW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +1.0337 +1.0341 1 3 1 3
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0001 0.0001 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean -0.0019 -0.0019 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median -0.0021 -0.0021 194 193 194 193
Sony/DSLR-A350/DSC05472.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev -0.4441 -0.4282 0 0 0 0
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_pvalue 0.0000 0.4263 U Test, Repetitions: 25 vs 25
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_mean +0.0258 -0.0006 81 83 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_median +0.0235 -0.0011 81 82 19 19
Sony/ILCE-7RM2/14-bit-compressed.ARW/threads:8/real_time_stddev +0.1634 +0.1070 1 1 0 0
```
{F7443905}
If we look at the `_mean`s, the time column, the biggest win is `-7.7%` (`Canon/EOS 5D Mark II/10.canon.sraw2.cr2`),
and the biggest loose is `+3.3%` (`Panasonic/DC-GH5S/P1022085.RW2`);
Overall: mean `-0.7436%`, median `-0.23%`, `cbrt(sum(time^3))` = `-8.73%`
Looks good so far i'd say.
llvm-exegesis details:
{F7371117} {F7371125}
{F7371128} {F7371144} {F7371158}
Reviewers: craig.topper, RKSimon, andreadb, courbet, avt77, spatel, GGanesh
Reviewed By: andreadb
Subscribers: javed.absar, gbedwell, jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52779
llvm-svn: 345463
2018-10-28 04:46:30 +08:00
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [5:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [5:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [10:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [10:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BDVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [5:1.00]
|
2018-10-28 04:36:11 +08:00
|
|
|
;
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; BTVER2-LABEL: v16f32_no_step2:
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2: # %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [2:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [7:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [7:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; BTVER2-NEXT: retq # sched: [4:1.00]
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-LABEL: v16f32_no_step2:
|
|
|
|
; SANDY: # %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [7:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [7:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [12:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [12:1.00]
|
|
|
|
; SANDY-NEXT: retq # sched: [1:1.00]
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-LABEL: v16f32_no_step2:
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL: # %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [12:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [12:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-LABEL: v16f32_no_step2:
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA: # %bb.0:
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vrcpps %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm0, %ymm0 # sched: [12:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %ymm1, %ymm1 # sched: [12:0.50]
|
|
|
|
; HASWELL-NO-FMA-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; KNL-LABEL: v16f32_no_step2:
|
|
|
|
; KNL: # %bb.0:
|
2018-05-07 19:50:44 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vrcp14ps %zmm0, %zmm0 # sched: [11:2.00]
|
2018-05-07 01:48:21 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %zmm0, %zmm0 # sched: [12:0.50]
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; KNL-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
|
|
|
;
|
|
|
|
; SKX-LABEL: v16f32_no_step2:
|
|
|
|
; SKX: # %bb.0:
|
2018-06-11 22:37:53 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vrcp14ps %zmm0, %zmm0 # sched: [4:2.00]
|
2018-05-07 01:48:21 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: vmulps {{.*}}(%rip), %zmm0, %zmm0 # sched: [11:0.50]
|
2018-05-07 01:45:40 +08:00
|
|
|
; SKX-NEXT: retq # sched: [7:1.00]
|
|
|
|
%div = fdiv fast <16 x float> <float 1.0, float 2.0, float 3.0, float 4.0, float 5.0, float 6.0, float 7.0, float 8.0, float 9.0, float 10.0, float 11.0, float 12.0, float 13.0, float 14.0, float 15.0, float 16.0>, %x
|
|
|
|
ret <16 x float> %div
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-12-16 17:56:02 +08:00
|
|
|
attributes #0 = { "unsafe-fp-math"="true" "reciprocal-estimates"="!divf,!vec-divf" }
|
|
|
|
attributes #1 = { "unsafe-fp-math"="true" "reciprocal-estimates"="divf,vec-divf" }
|
|
|
|
attributes #2 = { "unsafe-fp-math"="true" "reciprocal-estimates"="divf:2,vec-divf:2" }
|
|
|
|
attributes #3 = { "unsafe-fp-math"="true" "reciprocal-estimates"="divf:0,vec-divf:0" }
|
|
|
|
|