maxjhandsome
/
llvm-project
forked from OSchip/llvm-project
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Releases Wiki Activity
llvm-project/llvm/test/Demangle/ms-templates.test

202 lines
8.5 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Normal View History

[MS Demangler] Fix several issues related to templates. These were uncovered when porting the mangling tests in ms-templates.cpp from clang/CodeGenCXX over to demangling tests. The main issues fixed here are surrounding integer literal signed and unsignedness, empty array dimensions, and pointer and reference non-type template parameters. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50512 llvm-svn: 339434
2018-08-10 22:31:04 +08:00
; These tests are based on clang/test/CodeGenCXX/mangle-ms-cxx11.cpp
; RUN: llvm-undname < %s | FileCheck %s
; CHECK-NOT: Invalid mangled name
??0?$Class@VTypename@@@@QAE@XZ
; CHECK: __thiscall Class<class Typename>::Class<class Typename>(void)
??0?$Class@VTypename@@@@QEAA@XZ
; CHECK: __cdecl Class<class Typename>::Class<class Typename>(void)
[MS Demangler] Demangle cv qualifiers on template args. Before we wouldn't properly demangle something like Foo<const int>. Template args have a special escape sequence '$$C' that is optional, but if it is present contains qualifiers. So we need to check for this and only if it present, demangle qualifiers before demangling the type. With this fix, we re-enable some tests that were previously marked FIXME. llvm-svn: 339465
2018-08-11 03:57:36 +08:00
??0?$Class@$$CBVTypename@@@@QAE@XZ
; CHECK: __thiscall Class<class Typename const>::Class<class Typename const>(void)
??0?$Class@$$CBVTypename@@@@QEAA@XZ
; CHECK: __cdecl Class<class Typename const>::Class<class Typename const>(void)
??0?$Class@$$CCVTypename@@@@QAE@XZ
; CHECK: __thiscall Class<class Typename volatile>::Class<class Typename volatile>(void)
??0?$Class@$$CCVTypename@@@@QEAA@XZ
; CHECK: __cdecl Class<class Typename volatile>::Class<class Typename volatile>(void)
??0?$Class@$$CDVTypename@@@@QAE@XZ
; CHECK: __thiscall Class<class Typename const volatile>::Class<class Typename const volatile>(void)
??0?$Class@$$CDVTypename@@@@QEAA@XZ
; CHECK: __cdecl Class<class Typename const volatile>::Class<class Typename const volatile>(void)
[MS Demangler] Fix several issues related to templates. These were uncovered when porting the mangling tests in ms-templates.cpp from clang/CodeGenCXX over to demangling tests. The main issues fixed here are surrounding integer literal signed and unsignedness, empty array dimensions, and pointer and reference non-type template parameters. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50512 llvm-svn: 339434
2018-08-10 22:31:04 +08:00
??0?$Class@V?$Nested@VTypename@@@@@@QAE@XZ
; CHECK: __thiscall Class<class Nested<class Typename>>::Class<class Nested<class Typename>>(void)
??0?$Class@V?$Nested@VTypename@@@@@@QEAA@XZ
; CHECK: __cdecl Class<class Nested<class Typename>>::Class<class Nested<class Typename>>(void)
??0?$Class@QAH@@QAE@XZ
; CHECK: __thiscall Class<int *const>::Class<int *const>(void)
??0?$Class@QEAH@@QEAA@XZ
; CHECK: __cdecl Class<int *const>::Class<int *const>(void)
??0?$Class@$$A6AHXZ@@QAE@XZ
; CHECK: __thiscall Class<int __cdecl(void)>::Class<int __cdecl(void)>(void)
??0?$Class@$$A6AHXZ@@QEAA@XZ
; CHECK: __cdecl Class<int __cdecl(void)>::Class<int __cdecl(void)>(void)
??0?$Class@$$BY0A@H@@QAE@XZ
; CHECK: __thiscall Class<int[]>::Class<int[]>(void)
??0?$Class@$$BY0A@H@@QEAA@XZ
; CHECK: __cdecl Class<int[]>::Class<int[]>(void)
??0?$Class@$$BY04H@@QAE@XZ
; CHECK: __thiscall Class<int[5]>::Class<int[5]>(void)
??0?$Class@$$BY04H@@QEAA@XZ
; CHECK: __cdecl Class<int[5]>::Class<int[5]>(void)
??0?$Class@$$BY04$$CBH@@QAE@XZ
; CHECK: __thiscall Class<int const[5]>::Class<int const[5]>(void)
??0?$Class@$$BY04$$CBH@@QEAA@XZ
; CHECK: __cdecl Class<int const[5]>::Class<int const[5]>(void)
??0?$Class@$$BY04QAH@@QAE@XZ
; CHECK: __thiscall Class<int *const[5]>::Class<int *const[5]>(void)
??0?$Class@$$BY04QEAH@@QEAA@XZ
; CHECK: __cdecl Class<int *const[5]>::Class<int *const[5]>(void)
??0?$BoolTemplate@$0A@@@QAE@XZ
; CHECK: __thiscall BoolTemplate<0>::BoolTemplate<0>(void)
??0?$BoolTemplate@$0A@@@QEAA@XZ
; CHECK: __cdecl BoolTemplate<0>::BoolTemplate<0>(void)
??0?$BoolTemplate@$00@@QAE@XZ
; CHECK: __thiscall BoolTemplate<1>::BoolTemplate<1>(void)
??0?$BoolTemplate@$00@@QEAA@XZ
; CHECK: __cdecl BoolTemplate<1>::BoolTemplate<1>(void)
??$Foo@H@?$BoolTemplate@$00@@QAEXH@Z
; CHECK: void __thiscall BoolTemplate<1>::Foo<int>(int)
??$Foo@H@?$BoolTemplate@$00@@QEAAXH@Z
; CHECK: void __cdecl BoolTemplate<1>::Foo<int>(int)
??0?$IntTemplate@$0A@@@QAE@XZ
; CHECK: __thiscall IntTemplate<0>::IntTemplate<0>(void)
??0?$IntTemplate@$0A@@@QEAA@XZ
; CHECK: __cdecl IntTemplate<0>::IntTemplate<0>(void)
??0?$IntTemplate@$04@@QAE@XZ
; CHECK: __thiscall IntTemplate<5>::IntTemplate<5>(void)
??0?$IntTemplate@$04@@QEAA@XZ
; CHECK: __cdecl IntTemplate<5>::IntTemplate<5>(void)
??0?$IntTemplate@$0L@@@QAE@XZ
; CHECK: __thiscall IntTemplate<11>::IntTemplate<11>(void)
??0?$IntTemplate@$0L@@@QEAA@XZ
; CHECK: __cdecl IntTemplate<11>::IntTemplate<11>(void)
??0?$IntTemplate@$0BAA@@@QAE@XZ
; CHECK: __thiscall IntTemplate<256>::IntTemplate<256>(void)
??0?$IntTemplate@$0BAA@@@QEAA@XZ
; CHECK: __cdecl IntTemplate<256>::IntTemplate<256>(void)
??0?$IntTemplate@$0CAB@@@QAE@XZ
; CHECK: __thiscall IntTemplate<513>::IntTemplate<513>(void)
??0?$IntTemplate@$0CAB@@@QEAA@XZ
; CHECK: __cdecl IntTemplate<513>::IntTemplate<513>(void)
??0?$IntTemplate@$0EAC@@@QAE@XZ
; CHECK: __thiscall IntTemplate<1026>::IntTemplate<1026>(void)
??0?$IntTemplate@$0EAC@@@QEAA@XZ
; CHECK: __cdecl IntTemplate<1026>::IntTemplate<1026>(void)
??0?$IntTemplate@$0PPPP@@@QAE@XZ
; CHECK: __thiscall IntTemplate<65535>::IntTemplate<65535>(void)
??0?$IntTemplate@$0PPPP@@@QEAA@XZ
; CHECK: __cdecl IntTemplate<65535>::IntTemplate<65535>(void)
??0?$IntTemplate@$0?0@@QAE@XZ
; CHECK: __thiscall IntTemplate<-1>::IntTemplate<-1>(void)
??0?$IntTemplate@$0?0@@QEAA@XZ
; CHECK: __cdecl IntTemplate<-1>::IntTemplate<-1>(void)
??0?$IntTemplate@$0?8@@QAE@XZ
; CHECK: __thiscall IntTemplate<-9>::IntTemplate<-9>(void)
??0?$IntTemplate@$0?8@@QEAA@XZ
; CHECK: __cdecl IntTemplate<-9>::IntTemplate<-9>(void)
??0?$IntTemplate@$0?9@@QAE@XZ
; CHECK: __thiscall IntTemplate<-10>::IntTemplate<-10>(void)
??0?$IntTemplate@$0?9@@QEAA@XZ
; CHECK: __cdecl IntTemplate<-10>::IntTemplate<-10>(void)
??0?$IntTemplate@$0?L@@@QAE@XZ
; CHECK: __thiscall IntTemplate<-11>::IntTemplate<-11>(void)
??0?$IntTemplate@$0?L@@@QEAA@XZ
; CHECK: __cdecl IntTemplate<-11>::IntTemplate<-11>(void)
??0?$UnsignedIntTemplate@$0PPPPPPPP@@@QAE@XZ
; CHECK: __thiscall UnsignedIntTemplate<4294967295>::UnsignedIntTemplate<4294967295>(void)
??0?$UnsignedIntTemplate@$0PPPPPPPP@@@QEAA@XZ
; CHECK: __cdecl UnsignedIntTemplate<4294967295>::UnsignedIntTemplate<4294967295>(void)
??0?$LongLongTemplate@$0?IAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA@@@QAE@XZ
; CHECK: __thiscall LongLongTemplate<-9223372036854775808>::LongLongTemplate<-9223372036854775808>(void)
??0?$LongLongTemplate@$0?IAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA@@@QEAA@XZ
; CHECK: __cdecl LongLongTemplate<-9223372036854775808>::LongLongTemplate<-9223372036854775808>(void)
??0?$LongLongTemplate@$0HPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP@@@QAE@XZ
; CHECK: __thiscall LongLongTemplate<9223372036854775807>::LongLongTemplate<9223372036854775807>(void)
??0?$LongLongTemplate@$0HPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP@@@QEAA@XZ
; CHECK: __cdecl LongLongTemplate<9223372036854775807>::LongLongTemplate<9223372036854775807>(void)
; -1 is indistinguishable from uint64_max in this encoding.
??0?$UnsignedLongLongTemplate@$0?0@@QAE@XZ
; CHECK: __thiscall UnsignedLongLongTemplate<-1>::UnsignedLongLongTemplate<-1>(void)
??0?$UnsignedLongLongTemplate@$0?0@@QEAA@XZ
; CHECK: __cdecl UnsignedLongLongTemplate<-1>::UnsignedLongLongTemplate<-1>(void)
??$foo@H@space@@YAABHABH@Z
; CHECK: int const & __cdecl space::foo<int>(int const &)
??$foo@H@space@@YAAEBHAEBH@Z
; CHECK: int const & __cdecl space::foo<int>(int const &)
??$FunctionPointerTemplate@$1?spam@@YAXXZ@@YAXXZ
; CHECK: void __cdecl FunctionPointerTemplate<&void __cdecl spam(void)>(void)
??$variadic_fn_template@HHHH@@YAXABH000@Z
; CHECK: void __cdecl variadic_fn_template<int, int, int, int>(int const &, int const &, int const &, int const &)
??$variadic_fn_template@HHD$$BY01D@@YAXABH0ABDAAY01$$CBD@Z
; CHECK: void __cdecl variadic_fn_template<int, int, char, char[2]>(int const &, int const &, char const &, char const (&)[2]
??0?$VariadicClass@HD_N@@QAE@XZ
; CHECK: __thiscall VariadicClass<int, char, bool>::VariadicClass<int, char, bool>(void)
??0?$VariadicClass@_NDH@@QAE@XZ
; CHECK: __thiscall VariadicClass<bool, char, int>::VariadicClass<bool, char, int>(void)
?template_template_fun@@YAXU?$Type@U?$Thing@USecond@@$00@@USecond@@@@@Z
; CHECK: void __cdecl template_template_fun(struct Type<struct Thing<struct Second, 1>, struct Second>)
??$template_template_specialization@$$A6AXU?$Type@U?$Thing@USecond@@$00@@USecond@@@@@Z@@YAXXZ
; CHECK: void __cdecl template_template_specialization<void __cdecl(struct Type<struct Thing<struct Second, 1>, struct Second>)>(void)
?f@@YAXU?$S1@$0A@@@@Z
; CHECK: void __cdecl f(struct S1<0>)
?recref@@YAXU?$type1@$E?inst@@3Urecord@@B@@@Z
; CHECK: void __cdecl recref(struct type1<struct record const inst>)
?fun@@YAXU?$UUIDType1@Uuuid@@$1?_GUID_12345678_1234_1234_1234_1234567890ab@@3U__s_GUID@@B@@@Z
; CHECK: void __cdecl fun(struct UUIDType1<struct uuid, &struct __s_GUID const _GUID_12345678_1234_1234_1234_1234567890ab>)
?fun@@YAXU?$UUIDType2@Uuuid@@$E?_GUID_12345678_1234_1234_1234_1234567890ab@@3U__s_GUID@@B@@@Z
; CHECK: void __cdecl fun(struct UUIDType2<struct uuid, struct __s_GUID const _GUID_12345678_1234_1234_1234_1234567890ab>)
?FunctionDefinedWithInjectedName@@YAXU?$TypeWithFriendDefinition@H@@@Z
; CHECK: void __cdecl FunctionDefinedWithInjectedName(struct TypeWithFriendDefinition<int>)
?bar@?$UUIDType4@$1?_GUID_12345678_1234_1234_1234_1234567890ab@@3U__s_GUID@@B@@QAEXXZ
[MS Demangler] Resolve backreferences eagerly, not lazily. A while back I submitted a patch to resolve backreferences lazily, thinking this that it was not always possible to know in advance what type you were looking at until you had completed a full pass over the input, and therefore it would be impossible to resolve backreferences eagerly. This was mistaken though, and turned out to be an unrelated problem. In fact, the reverse is true. You *must* resolve backreferences eagerly. This is because certain types of nested mangled symbols do not share a backreference context with their parent symbol, and as such, if you try to resolve them lazily their backreference context will have been lost by the time you finish demangling the entire input. On the other hand, resolving them eagerly appears to always work, and enables us to port many more tests over. llvm-svn: 340126
2018-08-19 02:49:48 +08:00
; CHECK: void __thiscall UUIDType4<&struct __s_GUID const _GUID_12345678_1234_1234_1234_1234567890ab>::bar(void)
??$f@US@@$1?g@1@QEAAXXZ@@YAXXZ
[MS Demangler] Print public:, protected:, private: if set in FunctionClass or a variable's StorageClass. undname prints them, and the information is in the decorated name, so we probably shouldn't lose it when undecorating. I spot-checked a few of the funnier-looking outputs, and undname has the same output. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54396 llvm-svn: 346791
2018-11-14 04:18:26 +08:00
; CHECK: void __cdecl f<struct S, &public: void __cdecl S::g(void)>(void)
[MS Demangler] Print template constructor args. Previously if you had something like this: template<typename T> struct Foo { template<typename U> Foo(U); }; Foo F(3.7); this would mangle as ??$?0N@?$Foo@H@@QEAA@N@Z and this would be demangled as: undname: __cdecl Foo<int>::Foo<int><double>(double) llvm-undname: __cdecl Foo<int>::Foo<int>(double) Note the lack of the constructor template parameter in our demangling. This patch makes it so we print the constructor argument list. llvm-svn: 340356
2018-08-22 06:52:52 +08:00
??$?0N@?$Foo@H@@QEAA@N@Z
[MS Demangler] Print public:, protected:, private: if set in FunctionClass or a variable's StorageClass. undname prints them, and the information is in the decorated name, so we probably shouldn't lose it when undecorating. I spot-checked a few of the funnier-looking outputs, and undname has the same output. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54396 llvm-svn: 346791
2018-11-14 04:18:26 +08:00
; CHECK: __cdecl Foo<int>::Foo<int><double>(double)