llvm-project/clang/test/Sema/attr-availability-macosx.c

32 lines
1.3 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

Implement a new 'availability' attribute, that allows one to specify which versions of an OS provide a certain facility. For example, void foo() __attribute__((availability(macosx,introduced=10.2,deprecated=10.4,obsoleted=10.6))); says that the function "foo" was introduced in 10.2, deprecated in 10.4, and completely obsoleted in 10.6. This attribute ties in with the deployment targets (e.g., -mmacosx-version-min=10.1 specifies that we want to deploy back to Mac OS X 10.1). There are several concrete behaviors that this attribute enables, as illustrated with the function foo() above: - If we choose a deployment target >= Mac OS X 10.4, uses of "foo" will result in a deprecation warning, as if we had placed attribute((deprecated)) on it (but with a better diagnostic) - If we choose a deployment target >= Mac OS X 10.6, uses of "foo" will result in an "unavailable" warning (in C)/error (in C++), as if we had placed attribute((unavailable)) on it - If we choose a deployment target prior to 10.2, foo() is weak-imported (if it is a kind of entity that can be weak imported), as if we had placed the weak_import attribute on it. Naturally, there can be multiple availability attributes on a declaration, for different platforms; only the current platform matters when checking availability attributes. The only platforms this attribute currently works for are "ios" and "macosx", since we already have -mxxxx-version-min flags for them and we have experience there with macro tricks translating down to the deprecated/unavailable/weak_import attributes. The end goal is to open this up to other platforms, and even extension to other "platforms" that are really libraries (say, through a #pragma clang define_system), but that hasn't yet been designed and we may want to shake out more issues with this narrower problem first. Addresses <rdar://problem/6690412>. As a drive-by bug-fix, if an entity is both deprecated and unavailable, we only emit the "unavailable" diagnostic. llvm-svn: 128127
2011-03-23 08:50:03 +08:00
// RUN: %clang_cc1 "-triple" "x86_64-apple-darwin9.0.0" -fsyntax-only -verify %s
void f0(int) __attribute__((availability(macosx,introduced=10.4,deprecated=10.6)));
void f1(int) __attribute__((availability(macosx,introduced=10.5)));
void f2(int) __attribute__((availability(macosx,introduced=10.4,deprecated=10.5)));
void f3(int) __attribute__((availability(macosx,introduced=10.6)));
void f4(int) __attribute__((availability(macosx,introduced=10.1,deprecated=10.3,obsoleted=10.5), availability(ios,introduced=2.0,deprecated=3.0))); // expected-note{{explicitly marked unavailable}}
void f5(int) __attribute__((availability(ios,introduced=3.2), availability(macosx,unavailable))); // expected-note{{function has been explicitly marked unavailable here}}
Implement a new 'availability' attribute, that allows one to specify which versions of an OS provide a certain facility. For example, void foo() __attribute__((availability(macosx,introduced=10.2,deprecated=10.4,obsoleted=10.6))); says that the function "foo" was introduced in 10.2, deprecated in 10.4, and completely obsoleted in 10.6. This attribute ties in with the deployment targets (e.g., -mmacosx-version-min=10.1 specifies that we want to deploy back to Mac OS X 10.1). There are several concrete behaviors that this attribute enables, as illustrated with the function foo() above: - If we choose a deployment target >= Mac OS X 10.4, uses of "foo" will result in a deprecation warning, as if we had placed attribute((deprecated)) on it (but with a better diagnostic) - If we choose a deployment target >= Mac OS X 10.6, uses of "foo" will result in an "unavailable" warning (in C)/error (in C++), as if we had placed attribute((unavailable)) on it - If we choose a deployment target prior to 10.2, foo() is weak-imported (if it is a kind of entity that can be weak imported), as if we had placed the weak_import attribute on it. Naturally, there can be multiple availability attributes on a declaration, for different platforms; only the current platform matters when checking availability attributes. The only platforms this attribute currently works for are "ios" and "macosx", since we already have -mxxxx-version-min flags for them and we have experience there with macro tricks translating down to the deprecated/unavailable/weak_import attributes. The end goal is to open this up to other platforms, and even extension to other "platforms" that are really libraries (say, through a #pragma clang define_system), but that hasn't yet been designed and we may want to shake out more issues with this narrower problem first. Addresses <rdar://problem/6690412>. As a drive-by bug-fix, if an entity is both deprecated and unavailable, we only emit the "unavailable" diagnostic. llvm-svn: 128127
2011-03-23 08:50:03 +08:00
void test() {
f0(0);
f1(0);
f2(0); // expected-warning{{'f2' is deprecated: first deprecated in Mac OS X 10.5}}
f3(0);
f4(0); // expected-error{{f4' is unavailable: obsoleted in Mac OS X 10.5}}
f5(0); // expected-error{{'f5' is unavailable: not available on Mac OS X}}
Implement a new 'availability' attribute, that allows one to specify which versions of an OS provide a certain facility. For example, void foo() __attribute__((availability(macosx,introduced=10.2,deprecated=10.4,obsoleted=10.6))); says that the function "foo" was introduced in 10.2, deprecated in 10.4, and completely obsoleted in 10.6. This attribute ties in with the deployment targets (e.g., -mmacosx-version-min=10.1 specifies that we want to deploy back to Mac OS X 10.1). There are several concrete behaviors that this attribute enables, as illustrated with the function foo() above: - If we choose a deployment target >= Mac OS X 10.4, uses of "foo" will result in a deprecation warning, as if we had placed attribute((deprecated)) on it (but with a better diagnostic) - If we choose a deployment target >= Mac OS X 10.6, uses of "foo" will result in an "unavailable" warning (in C)/error (in C++), as if we had placed attribute((unavailable)) on it - If we choose a deployment target prior to 10.2, foo() is weak-imported (if it is a kind of entity that can be weak imported), as if we had placed the weak_import attribute on it. Naturally, there can be multiple availability attributes on a declaration, for different platforms; only the current platform matters when checking availability attributes. The only platforms this attribute currently works for are "ios" and "macosx", since we already have -mxxxx-version-min flags for them and we have experience there with macro tricks translating down to the deprecated/unavailable/weak_import attributes. The end goal is to open this up to other platforms, and even extension to other "platforms" that are really libraries (say, through a #pragma clang define_system), but that hasn't yet been designed and we may want to shake out more issues with this narrower problem first. Addresses <rdar://problem/6690412>. As a drive-by bug-fix, if an entity is both deprecated and unavailable, we only emit the "unavailable" diagnostic. llvm-svn: 128127
2011-03-23 08:50:03 +08:00
}
// rdar://10535640
enum {
foo __attribute__((availability(macosx,introduced=8.0,deprecated=9.0)))
};
enum {
bar __attribute__((availability(macosx,introduced=8.0,deprecated=9.0))) = foo
};
enum __attribute__((availability(macosx,introduced=8.0,deprecated=9.0))) {
bar1 = foo
};