2010-02-24 15:06:50 +08:00
|
|
|
//===- DAGISelMatcherOpt.cpp - Optimize a DAG Matcher ---------------------===//
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
|
|
|
|
// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
// This file implements the DAG Matcher optimizer.
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "DAGISelMatcher.h"
|
2010-03-01 04:49:53 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "CodeGenDAGPatterns.h"
|
2010-03-01 14:59:22 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "llvm/ADT/StringSet.h"
|
2010-02-27 15:49:13 +08:00
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "llvm/Support/raw_ostream.h"
|
2010-02-24 15:06:50 +08:00
|
|
|
using namespace llvm;
|
|
|
|
|
2014-04-22 11:06:00 +08:00
|
|
|
#define DEBUG_TYPE "isel-opt"
|
|
|
|
|
2010-02-27 14:22:57 +08:00
|
|
|
/// ContractNodes - Turn multiple matcher node patterns like 'MoveChild+Record'
|
|
|
|
/// into single compound nodes like RecordChild.
|
2014-03-06 13:51:42 +08:00
|
|
|
static void ContractNodes(std::unique_ptr<Matcher> &MatcherPtr,
|
2010-03-01 04:49:53 +08:00
|
|
|
const CodeGenDAGPatterns &CGP) {
|
2010-02-24 15:31:45 +08:00
|
|
|
// If we reached the end of the chain, we're done.
|
2010-02-25 10:04:40 +08:00
|
|
|
Matcher *N = MatcherPtr.get();
|
2014-04-15 15:20:03 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!N) return;
|
2010-02-24 15:31:45 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-02-26 03:00:39 +08:00
|
|
|
// If we have a scope node, walk down all of the children.
|
|
|
|
if (ScopeMatcher *Scope = dyn_cast<ScopeMatcher>(N)) {
|
|
|
|
for (unsigned i = 0, e = Scope->getNumChildren(); i != e; ++i) {
|
2014-03-06 13:51:42 +08:00
|
|
|
std::unique_ptr<Matcher> Child(Scope->takeChild(i));
|
2010-03-01 04:49:53 +08:00
|
|
|
ContractNodes(Child, CGP);
|
2014-03-05 18:19:29 +08:00
|
|
|
Scope->resetChild(i, Child.release());
|
2010-02-26 03:00:39 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2010-02-24 15:31:45 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-02-25 03:52:48 +08:00
|
|
|
// If we found a movechild node with a node that comes in a 'foochild' form,
|
|
|
|
// transform it.
|
2010-02-25 10:04:40 +08:00
|
|
|
if (MoveChildMatcher *MC = dyn_cast<MoveChildMatcher>(N)) {
|
2014-04-15 15:20:03 +08:00
|
|
|
Matcher *New = nullptr;
|
2010-02-25 10:04:40 +08:00
|
|
|
if (RecordMatcher *RM = dyn_cast<RecordMatcher>(MC->getNext()))
|
2010-03-16 08:35:11 +08:00
|
|
|
if (MC->getChildNo() < 8) // Only have RecordChild0...7
|
|
|
|
New = new RecordChildMatcher(MC->getChildNo(), RM->getWhatFor(),
|
|
|
|
RM->getResultNo());
|
2014-02-05 13:44:28 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-24 08:41:19 +08:00
|
|
|
if (CheckTypeMatcher *CT = dyn_cast<CheckTypeMatcher>(MC->getNext()))
|
|
|
|
if (MC->getChildNo() < 8 && // Only have CheckChildType0...7
|
|
|
|
CT->getResNo() == 0) // CheckChildType checks res #0
|
2010-03-16 08:35:11 +08:00
|
|
|
New = new CheckChildTypeMatcher(MC->getChildNo(), CT->getType());
|
2013-10-05 13:38:16 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (CheckSameMatcher *CS = dyn_cast<CheckSameMatcher>(MC->getNext()))
|
|
|
|
if (MC->getChildNo() < 4) // Only have CheckChildSame0...3
|
|
|
|
New = new CheckChildSameMatcher(MC->getChildNo(), CS->getMatchNumber());
|
|
|
|
|
2014-02-05 13:44:28 +08:00
|
|
|
if (CheckIntegerMatcher *CS = dyn_cast<CheckIntegerMatcher>(MC->getNext()))
|
|
|
|
if (MC->getChildNo() < 5) // Only have CheckChildInteger0...4
|
|
|
|
New = new CheckChildIntegerMatcher(MC->getChildNo(), CS->getValue());
|
|
|
|
|
2010-02-25 04:15:25 +08:00
|
|
|
if (New) {
|
|
|
|
// Insert the new node.
|
2014-03-05 18:19:29 +08:00
|
|
|
New->setNext(MatcherPtr.release());
|
2010-02-25 09:56:48 +08:00
|
|
|
MatcherPtr.reset(New);
|
2010-02-25 04:15:25 +08:00
|
|
|
// Remove the old one.
|
|
|
|
MC->setNext(MC->getNext()->takeNext());
|
2010-03-01 04:49:53 +08:00
|
|
|
return ContractNodes(MatcherPtr, CGP);
|
2010-02-25 03:52:48 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2010-02-24 15:31:45 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2010-02-25 03:52:48 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-02-28 10:31:26 +08:00
|
|
|
// Zap movechild -> moveparent.
|
2010-02-25 10:04:40 +08:00
|
|
|
if (MoveChildMatcher *MC = dyn_cast<MoveChildMatcher>(N))
|
|
|
|
if (MoveParentMatcher *MP =
|
|
|
|
dyn_cast<MoveParentMatcher>(MC->getNext())) {
|
2010-02-25 09:56:48 +08:00
|
|
|
MatcherPtr.reset(MP->takeNext());
|
2010-03-01 04:49:53 +08:00
|
|
|
return ContractNodes(MatcherPtr, CGP);
|
2010-02-25 03:52:48 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2010-03-01 07:00:47 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-01 04:55:18 +08:00
|
|
|
// Turn EmitNode->CompleteMatch into MorphNodeTo if we can.
|
2010-02-28 10:31:26 +08:00
|
|
|
if (EmitNodeMatcher *EN = dyn_cast<EmitNodeMatcher>(N))
|
2010-02-28 10:41:25 +08:00
|
|
|
if (CompleteMatchMatcher *CM =
|
|
|
|
dyn_cast<CompleteMatchMatcher>(EN->getNext())) {
|
2010-03-01 04:55:18 +08:00
|
|
|
// We can only use MorphNodeTo if the result values match up.
|
2010-03-01 04:49:53 +08:00
|
|
|
unsigned RootResultFirst = EN->getFirstResultSlot();
|
|
|
|
bool ResultsMatch = true;
|
|
|
|
for (unsigned i = 0, e = CM->getNumResults(); i != e; ++i)
|
|
|
|
if (CM->getResult(i) != RootResultFirst+i)
|
|
|
|
ResultsMatch = false;
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-24 01:03:20 +08:00
|
|
|
// If the selected node defines a subset of the glue/chain results, we
|
2010-03-01 04:55:18 +08:00
|
|
|
// can't use MorphNodeTo. For example, we can't use MorphNodeTo if the
|
2010-03-01 04:49:53 +08:00
|
|
|
// matched pattern has a chain but the root node doesn't.
|
|
|
|
const PatternToMatch &Pattern = CM->getPattern();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!EN->hasChain() &&
|
|
|
|
Pattern.getSrcPattern()->NodeHasProperty(SDNPHasChain, CGP))
|
|
|
|
ResultsMatch = false;
|
|
|
|
|
2010-12-24 01:03:20 +08:00
|
|
|
// If the matched node has glue and the output root doesn't, we can't
|
2010-03-01 04:55:18 +08:00
|
|
|
// use MorphNodeTo.
|
2010-03-01 04:49:53 +08:00
|
|
|
//
|
2010-12-24 01:03:20 +08:00
|
|
|
// NOTE: Strictly speaking, we don't have to check for glue here
|
2010-03-01 04:49:53 +08:00
|
|
|
// because the code in the pattern generator doesn't handle it right. We
|
|
|
|
// do it anyway for thoroughness.
|
2010-03-01 05:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!EN->hasOutFlag() &&
|
2010-12-24 02:28:41 +08:00
|
|
|
Pattern.getSrcPattern()->NodeHasProperty(SDNPOutGlue, CGP))
|
2010-03-01 04:49:53 +08:00
|
|
|
ResultsMatch = false;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// If the root result node defines more results than the source root node
|
2010-12-24 01:03:20 +08:00
|
|
|
// *and* has a chain or glue input, then we can't match it because it
|
|
|
|
// would end up replacing the extra result with the chain/glue.
|
2010-03-01 04:49:53 +08:00
|
|
|
#if 0
|
2010-12-24 01:03:20 +08:00
|
|
|
if ((EN->hasGlue() || EN->hasChain()) &&
|
|
|
|
EN->getNumNonChainGlueVTs() > ... need to get no results reliably ...)
|
2010-03-01 04:49:53 +08:00
|
|
|
ResultMatch = false;
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (ResultsMatch) {
|
|
|
|
const SmallVectorImpl<MVT::SimpleValueType> &VTs = EN->getVTList();
|
|
|
|
const SmallVectorImpl<unsigned> &Operands = EN->getOperandList();
|
2010-03-01 04:55:18 +08:00
|
|
|
MatcherPtr.reset(new MorphNodeToMatcher(EN->getOpcodeName(),
|
2014-01-21 15:20:05 +08:00
|
|
|
VTs, Operands,
|
2010-03-01 05:53:42 +08:00
|
|
|
EN->hasChain(), EN->hasInFlag(),
|
|
|
|
EN->hasOutFlag(),
|
2010-03-01 04:55:18 +08:00
|
|
|
EN->hasMemRefs(),
|
|
|
|
EN->getNumFixedArityOperands(),
|
|
|
|
Pattern));
|
2010-03-01 04:49:53 +08:00
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2010-03-02 06:29:19 +08:00
|
|
|
// FIXME2: Kill off all the SelectionDAG::SelectNodeTo and getMachineNode
|
2010-03-01 04:55:18 +08:00
|
|
|
// variants.
|
2010-02-28 10:31:26 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2010-03-01 04:49:53 +08:00
|
|
|
ContractNodes(N->getNextPtr(), CGP);
|
2010-03-01 10:15:34 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// If we have a CheckType/CheckChildType/Record node followed by a
|
|
|
|
// CheckOpcode, invert the two nodes. We prefer to do structural checks
|
|
|
|
// before type checks, as this opens opportunities for factoring on targets
|
|
|
|
// like X86 where many operations are valid on multiple types.
|
|
|
|
if ((isa<CheckTypeMatcher>(N) || isa<CheckChildTypeMatcher>(N) ||
|
|
|
|
isa<RecordMatcher>(N)) &&
|
2010-03-01 15:17:40 +08:00
|
|
|
isa<CheckOpcodeMatcher>(N->getNext())) {
|
2010-03-01 10:15:34 +08:00
|
|
|
// Unlink the two nodes from the list.
|
2014-03-05 18:19:29 +08:00
|
|
|
Matcher *CheckType = MatcherPtr.release();
|
2010-03-01 10:15:34 +08:00
|
|
|
Matcher *CheckOpcode = CheckType->takeNext();
|
|
|
|
Matcher *Tail = CheckOpcode->takeNext();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Relink them.
|
|
|
|
MatcherPtr.reset(CheckOpcode);
|
|
|
|
CheckOpcode->setNext(CheckType);
|
|
|
|
CheckType->setNext(Tail);
|
|
|
|
return ContractNodes(MatcherPtr, CGP);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2010-02-24 15:31:45 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2010-03-07 15:20:49 +08:00
|
|
|
/// FindNodeWithKind - Scan a series of matchers looking for a matcher with a
|
|
|
|
/// specified kind. Return null if we didn't find one otherwise return the
|
|
|
|
/// matcher.
|
|
|
|
static Matcher *FindNodeWithKind(Matcher *M, Matcher::KindTy Kind) {
|
2010-03-07 15:01:28 +08:00
|
|
|
for (; M; M = M->getNext())
|
2010-03-07 15:20:49 +08:00
|
|
|
if (M->getKind() == Kind)
|
|
|
|
return M;
|
2014-04-15 15:20:03 +08:00
|
|
|
return nullptr;
|
2010-03-07 15:01:28 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010-02-27 14:22:57 +08:00
|
|
|
/// FactorNodes - Turn matches like this:
|
|
|
|
/// Scope
|
|
|
|
/// OPC_CheckType i32
|
|
|
|
/// ABC
|
|
|
|
/// OPC_CheckType i32
|
|
|
|
/// XYZ
|
|
|
|
/// into:
|
|
|
|
/// OPC_CheckType i32
|
|
|
|
/// Scope
|
|
|
|
/// ABC
|
|
|
|
/// XYZ
|
|
|
|
///
|
2014-03-06 13:51:42 +08:00
|
|
|
static void FactorNodes(std::unique_ptr<Matcher> &MatcherPtr) {
|
2010-02-25 09:57:41 +08:00
|
|
|
// If we reached the end of the chain, we're done.
|
2010-02-25 10:04:40 +08:00
|
|
|
Matcher *N = MatcherPtr.get();
|
2014-04-15 15:20:03 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!N) return;
|
2010-02-25 09:57:41 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// If this is not a push node, just scan for one.
|
2010-02-26 03:00:39 +08:00
|
|
|
ScopeMatcher *Scope = dyn_cast<ScopeMatcher>(N);
|
2014-04-15 15:20:03 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!Scope)
|
2010-02-25 09:57:41 +08:00
|
|
|
return FactorNodes(N->getNextPtr());
|
|
|
|
|
2010-02-26 03:00:39 +08:00
|
|
|
// Okay, pull together the children of the scope node into a vector so we can
|
2016-05-05 14:19:25 +08:00
|
|
|
// inspect it more easily.
|
2010-02-25 10:04:40 +08:00
|
|
|
SmallVector<Matcher*, 32> OptionsToMatch;
|
2010-02-25 09:57:41 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-02-26 03:00:39 +08:00
|
|
|
for (unsigned i = 0, e = Scope->getNumChildren(); i != e; ++i) {
|
2010-02-25 15:45:24 +08:00
|
|
|
// Factor the subexpression.
|
2014-03-06 13:51:42 +08:00
|
|
|
std::unique_ptr<Matcher> Child(Scope->takeChild(i));
|
2010-02-26 03:00:39 +08:00
|
|
|
FactorNodes(Child);
|
|
|
|
|
2016-11-22 15:00:06 +08:00
|
|
|
if (Child) {
|
|
|
|
// If the child is a ScopeMatcher we can just merge its contents.
|
|
|
|
if (auto *SM = dyn_cast<ScopeMatcher>(Child.get())) {
|
|
|
|
for (unsigned j = 0, e = SM->getNumChildren(); j != e; ++j)
|
|
|
|
OptionsToMatch.push_back(SM->takeChild(j));
|
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
OptionsToMatch.push_back(Child.release());
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2010-02-25 15:45:24 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SmallVector<Matcher*, 32> NewOptionsToMatch;
|
2010-03-01 14:59:22 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-02-26 16:08:41 +08:00
|
|
|
// Loop over options to match, merging neighboring patterns with identical
|
|
|
|
// starting nodes into a shared matcher.
|
2010-02-27 15:49:13 +08:00
|
|
|
for (unsigned OptionIdx = 0, e = OptionsToMatch.size(); OptionIdx != e;) {
|
2010-02-25 15:45:24 +08:00
|
|
|
// Find the set of matchers that start with this node.
|
2010-02-27 15:49:13 +08:00
|
|
|
Matcher *Optn = OptionsToMatch[OptionIdx++];
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (OptionIdx == e) {
|
2010-02-26 16:08:41 +08:00
|
|
|
NewOptionsToMatch.push_back(Optn);
|
2010-02-26 15:36:37 +08:00
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2010-02-25 15:45:24 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-02-27 15:49:13 +08:00
|
|
|
// See if the next option starts with the same matcher. If the two
|
|
|
|
// neighbors *do* start with the same matcher, we can factor the matcher out
|
|
|
|
// of at least these two patterns. See what the maximal set we can merge
|
|
|
|
// together is.
|
2010-02-25 15:45:24 +08:00
|
|
|
SmallVector<Matcher*, 8> EqualMatchers;
|
|
|
|
EqualMatchers.push_back(Optn);
|
|
|
|
|
2010-02-27 15:49:13 +08:00
|
|
|
// Factor all of the known-equal matchers after this one into the same
|
|
|
|
// group.
|
|
|
|
while (OptionIdx != e && OptionsToMatch[OptionIdx]->isEqual(Optn))
|
|
|
|
EqualMatchers.push_back(OptionsToMatch[OptionIdx++]);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// If we found a non-equal matcher, see if it is contradictory with the
|
|
|
|
// current node. If so, we know that the ordering relation between the
|
|
|
|
// current sets of nodes and this node don't matter. Look past it to see if
|
|
|
|
// we can merge anything else into this matching group.
|
|
|
|
unsigned Scan = OptionIdx;
|
|
|
|
while (1) {
|
2010-03-07 15:01:28 +08:00
|
|
|
// If we ran out of stuff to scan, we're done.
|
|
|
|
if (Scan == e) break;
|
2010-02-27 15:49:13 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-07 15:20:49 +08:00
|
|
|
Matcher *ScanMatcher = OptionsToMatch[Scan];
|
|
|
|
|
2010-03-07 15:01:28 +08:00
|
|
|
// If we found an entry that matches out matcher, merge it into the set to
|
|
|
|
// handle.
|
2010-03-07 15:20:49 +08:00
|
|
|
if (Optn->isEqual(ScanMatcher)) {
|
2010-03-07 15:01:28 +08:00
|
|
|
// If is equal after all, add the option to EqualMatchers and remove it
|
|
|
|
// from OptionsToMatch.
|
2010-03-07 15:20:49 +08:00
|
|
|
EqualMatchers.push_back(ScanMatcher);
|
2010-03-07 15:01:28 +08:00
|
|
|
OptionsToMatch.erase(OptionsToMatch.begin()+Scan);
|
|
|
|
--e;
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// If the option we're checking for contradicts the start of the list,
|
|
|
|
// skip over it.
|
2010-03-07 15:20:49 +08:00
|
|
|
if (Optn->isContradictory(ScanMatcher)) {
|
2010-03-07 15:01:28 +08:00
|
|
|
++Scan;
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2010-02-27 15:49:13 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-07 15:20:49 +08:00
|
|
|
// If we're scanning for a simple node, see if it occurs later in the
|
|
|
|
// sequence. If so, and if we can move it up, it might be contradictory
|
|
|
|
// or the same as what we're looking for. If so, reorder it.
|
|
|
|
if (Optn->isSimplePredicateOrRecordNode()) {
|
|
|
|
Matcher *M2 = FindNodeWithKind(ScanMatcher, Optn->getKind());
|
2014-04-15 15:20:03 +08:00
|
|
|
if (M2 && M2 != ScanMatcher &&
|
2010-03-07 15:20:49 +08:00
|
|
|
M2->canMoveBefore(ScanMatcher) &&
|
|
|
|
(M2->isEqual(Optn) || M2->isContradictory(Optn))) {
|
|
|
|
Matcher *MatcherWithoutM2 = ScanMatcher->unlinkNode(M2);
|
|
|
|
M2->setNext(MatcherWithoutM2);
|
|
|
|
OptionsToMatch[Scan] = M2;
|
2010-03-07 15:01:28 +08:00
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Otherwise, we don't know how to handle this entry, we have to bail.
|
|
|
|
break;
|
2010-02-27 15:49:13 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2010-02-28 05:48:43 +08:00
|
|
|
if (Scan != e &&
|
|
|
|
// Don't print it's obvious nothing extra could be merged anyway.
|
|
|
|
Scan+1 != e) {
|
2010-03-07 15:21:24 +08:00
|
|
|
DEBUG(errs() << "Couldn't merge this:\n";
|
2010-02-27 16:11:15 +08:00
|
|
|
Optn->print(errs(), 4);
|
|
|
|
errs() << "into this:\n";
|
|
|
|
OptionsToMatch[Scan]->print(errs(), 4);
|
2010-02-27 16:13:23 +08:00
|
|
|
if (Scan+1 != e)
|
2010-02-27 16:11:15 +08:00
|
|
|
OptionsToMatch[Scan+1]->printOne(errs());
|
2010-02-27 16:13:23 +08:00
|
|
|
if (Scan+2 < e)
|
2010-02-27 16:11:15 +08:00
|
|
|
OptionsToMatch[Scan+2]->printOne(errs());
|
2010-03-07 15:21:24 +08:00
|
|
|
errs() << "\n");
|
2010-02-27 15:49:13 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// If we only found one option starting with this matcher, no factoring is
|
|
|
|
// possible.
|
|
|
|
if (EqualMatchers.size() == 1) {
|
|
|
|
NewOptionsToMatch.push_back(EqualMatchers[0]);
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2010-02-25 15:45:24 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Factor these checks by pulling the first node off each entry and
|
2010-02-26 15:36:37 +08:00
|
|
|
// discarding it. Take the first one off the first entry to reuse.
|
|
|
|
Matcher *Shared = Optn;
|
|
|
|
Optn = Optn->takeNext();
|
|
|
|
EqualMatchers[0] = Optn;
|
|
|
|
|
2010-02-26 16:08:41 +08:00
|
|
|
// Remove and delete the first node from the other matchers we're factoring.
|
|
|
|
for (unsigned i = 1, e = EqualMatchers.size(); i != e; ++i) {
|
|
|
|
Matcher *Tmp = EqualMatchers[i]->takeNext();
|
|
|
|
delete EqualMatchers[i];
|
|
|
|
EqualMatchers[i] = Tmp;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2010-02-26 15:36:37 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2014-01-21 15:20:05 +08:00
|
|
|
Shared->setNext(new ScopeMatcher(EqualMatchers));
|
2010-02-26 15:36:37 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Recursively factor the newly created node.
|
|
|
|
FactorNodes(Shared->getNextPtr());
|
2010-02-25 15:45:24 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-02-26 15:36:37 +08:00
|
|
|
NewOptionsToMatch.push_back(Shared);
|
2010-02-25 15:45:24 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2010-03-01 14:59:22 +08:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// If we're down to a single pattern to match, then we don't need this scope
|
|
|
|
// anymore.
|
|
|
|
if (NewOptionsToMatch.size() == 1) {
|
|
|
|
MatcherPtr.reset(NewOptionsToMatch[0]);
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2010-03-02 06:04:33 +08:00
|
|
|
if (NewOptionsToMatch.empty()) {
|
2014-07-19 09:05:11 +08:00
|
|
|
MatcherPtr.reset();
|
2010-03-02 06:04:33 +08:00
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2010-03-01 14:59:22 +08:00
|
|
|
// If our factoring failed (didn't achieve anything) see if we can simplify in
|
|
|
|
// other ways.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Check to see if all of the leading entries are now opcode checks. If so,
|
|
|
|
// we can convert this Scope to be a OpcodeSwitch instead.
|
2010-03-03 14:28:15 +08:00
|
|
|
bool AllOpcodeChecks = true, AllTypeChecks = true;
|
2010-03-01 14:59:22 +08:00
|
|
|
for (unsigned i = 0, e = NewOptionsToMatch.size(); i != e; ++i) {
|
2010-03-07 15:01:28 +08:00
|
|
|
// Check to see if this breaks a series of CheckOpcodeMatchers.
|
|
|
|
if (AllOpcodeChecks &&
|
|
|
|
!isa<CheckOpcodeMatcher>(NewOptionsToMatch[i])) {
|
2010-03-01 14:59:22 +08:00
|
|
|
#if 0
|
2010-03-07 15:01:28 +08:00
|
|
|
if (i > 3) {
|
2010-03-03 14:28:15 +08:00
|
|
|
errs() << "FAILING OPC #" << i << "\n";
|
|
|
|
NewOptionsToMatch[i]->dump();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
AllOpcodeChecks = false;
|
2010-03-01 14:59:22 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2010-03-03 14:28:15 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-07 15:01:28 +08:00
|
|
|
// Check to see if this breaks a series of CheckTypeMatcher's.
|
|
|
|
if (AllTypeChecks) {
|
2010-03-07 15:20:49 +08:00
|
|
|
CheckTypeMatcher *CTM =
|
|
|
|
cast_or_null<CheckTypeMatcher>(FindNodeWithKind(NewOptionsToMatch[i],
|
|
|
|
Matcher::CheckType));
|
2014-04-15 15:20:03 +08:00
|
|
|
if (!CTM ||
|
2010-03-07 15:01:28 +08:00
|
|
|
// iPTR checks could alias any other case without us knowing, don't
|
|
|
|
// bother with them.
|
|
|
|
CTM->getType() == MVT::iPTR ||
|
2010-03-24 08:41:19 +08:00
|
|
|
// SwitchType only works for result #0.
|
|
|
|
CTM->getResNo() != 0 ||
|
2010-03-07 15:01:28 +08:00
|
|
|
// If the CheckType isn't at the start of the list, see if we can move
|
|
|
|
// it there.
|
|
|
|
!CTM->canMoveBefore(NewOptionsToMatch[i])) {
|
2010-03-03 14:28:15 +08:00
|
|
|
#if 0
|
2010-03-07 15:01:28 +08:00
|
|
|
if (i > 3 && AllTypeChecks) {
|
|
|
|
errs() << "FAILING TYPE #" << i << "\n";
|
|
|
|
NewOptionsToMatch[i]->dump();
|
|
|
|
}
|
2010-03-01 14:59:22 +08:00
|
|
|
#endif
|
2010-03-07 15:01:28 +08:00
|
|
|
AllTypeChecks = false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2010-03-03 14:28:15 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
2010-03-01 14:59:22 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// If all the options are CheckOpcode's, we can form the SwitchOpcode, woot.
|
|
|
|
if (AllOpcodeChecks) {
|
|
|
|
StringSet<> Opcodes;
|
|
|
|
SmallVector<std::pair<const SDNodeInfo*, Matcher*>, 8> Cases;
|
|
|
|
for (unsigned i = 0, e = NewOptionsToMatch.size(); i != e; ++i) {
|
2010-03-03 14:28:15 +08:00
|
|
|
CheckOpcodeMatcher *COM = cast<CheckOpcodeMatcher>(NewOptionsToMatch[i]);
|
2014-11-19 10:56:00 +08:00
|
|
|
assert(Opcodes.insert(COM->getOpcode().getEnumName()).second &&
|
2010-03-01 14:59:22 +08:00
|
|
|
"Duplicate opcodes not factored?");
|
2016-05-06 14:56:14 +08:00
|
|
|
Cases.push_back(std::make_pair(&COM->getOpcode(), COM->takeNext()));
|
|
|
|
delete COM;
|
2010-03-01 14:59:22 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-01-21 15:20:05 +08:00
|
|
|
MatcherPtr.reset(new SwitchOpcodeMatcher(Cases));
|
2010-03-01 14:59:22 +08:00
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2010-03-03 14:28:15 +08:00
|
|
|
// If all the options are CheckType's, we can form the SwitchType, woot.
|
|
|
|
if (AllTypeChecks) {
|
2010-03-07 15:01:28 +08:00
|
|
|
DenseMap<unsigned, unsigned> TypeEntry;
|
2010-03-03 14:28:15 +08:00
|
|
|
SmallVector<std::pair<MVT::SimpleValueType, Matcher*>, 8> Cases;
|
|
|
|
for (unsigned i = 0, e = NewOptionsToMatch.size(); i != e; ++i) {
|
2010-03-07 15:20:49 +08:00
|
|
|
CheckTypeMatcher *CTM =
|
|
|
|
cast_or_null<CheckTypeMatcher>(FindNodeWithKind(NewOptionsToMatch[i],
|
|
|
|
Matcher::CheckType));
|
2010-03-07 15:01:28 +08:00
|
|
|
Matcher *MatcherWithoutCTM = NewOptionsToMatch[i]->unlinkNode(CTM);
|
|
|
|
MVT::SimpleValueType CTMTy = CTM->getType();
|
|
|
|
delete CTM;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unsigned &Entry = TypeEntry[CTMTy];
|
|
|
|
if (Entry != 0) {
|
|
|
|
// If we have unfactored duplicate types, then we should factor them.
|
|
|
|
Matcher *PrevMatcher = Cases[Entry-1].second;
|
|
|
|
if (ScopeMatcher *SM = dyn_cast<ScopeMatcher>(PrevMatcher)) {
|
|
|
|
SM->setNumChildren(SM->getNumChildren()+1);
|
|
|
|
SM->resetChild(SM->getNumChildren()-1, MatcherWithoutCTM);
|
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Matcher *Entries[2] = { PrevMatcher, MatcherWithoutCTM };
|
2016-11-21 12:07:58 +08:00
|
|
|
Cases[Entry-1].second = new ScopeMatcher(Entries);
|
2010-03-07 15:01:28 +08:00
|
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entry = Cases.size()+1;
|
|
|
|
Cases.push_back(std::make_pair(CTMTy, MatcherWithoutCTM));
|
2010-03-03 14:28:15 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2016-11-21 12:07:58 +08:00
|
|
|
// Make sure we recursively factor any scopes we may have created.
|
|
|
|
for (auto &M : Cases) {
|
|
|
|
if (ScopeMatcher *SM = dyn_cast<ScopeMatcher>(M.second)) {
|
|
|
|
std::unique_ptr<Matcher> Scope(SM);
|
|
|
|
FactorNodes(Scope);
|
|
|
|
M.second = Scope.release();
|
|
|
|
assert(M.second && "null matcher");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2010-03-07 15:01:28 +08:00
|
|
|
if (Cases.size() != 1) {
|
2014-01-21 15:20:05 +08:00
|
|
|
MatcherPtr.reset(new SwitchTypeMatcher(Cases));
|
2010-03-07 15:01:28 +08:00
|
|
|
} else {
|
|
|
|
// If we factored and ended up with one case, create it now.
|
2010-03-24 08:41:19 +08:00
|
|
|
MatcherPtr.reset(new CheckTypeMatcher(Cases[0].first, 0));
|
2010-03-07 15:01:28 +08:00
|
|
|
MatcherPtr->setNext(Cases[0].second);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2010-03-03 14:28:15 +08:00
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2010-02-25 15:45:24 +08:00
|
|
|
|
2010-03-02 06:19:47 +08:00
|
|
|
// Reassemble the Scope node with the adjusted children.
|
|
|
|
Scope->setNumChildren(NewOptionsToMatch.size());
|
|
|
|
for (unsigned i = 0, e = NewOptionsToMatch.size(); i != e; ++i)
|
|
|
|
Scope->resetChild(i, NewOptionsToMatch[i]);
|
2010-02-25 09:57:41 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-12-15 08:40:07 +08:00
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
llvm::OptimizeMatcher(std::unique_ptr<Matcher> &MatcherPtr,
|
|
|
|
const CodeGenDAGPatterns &CGP) {
|
2010-03-01 04:49:53 +08:00
|
|
|
ContractNodes(MatcherPtr, CGP);
|
2010-02-25 09:57:41 +08:00
|
|
|
FactorNodes(MatcherPtr);
|
2010-02-24 15:06:50 +08:00
|
|
|
}
|