llvm-project/clang/test/Driver/armv8.1m.main.s

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

74 lines
3.1 KiB
ArmAsm
Raw Normal View History

# REQUIRES: arm-registered-target
# RUN: not %clang -c -target arm-none-none-eabi -march=armv8-m.main -o /dev/null %s 2>%t
# RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=ERROR-V8M < %t %s
# RUN: not %clang -c -target arm-none-none-eabi -march=armv8.1-m.main -o /dev/null %s 2>%t
# RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=ERROR-V81M < %t %s
# RUN: not %clang -c -target arm-none-none-eabi -march=armv8.1-m.main+dsp -o /dev/null %s 2>%t
# RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=ERROR-V81M_DSP < %t %s
[ARM] Allow "-march=foo+fp" to vary with foo Now, when clang processes an argument of the form "-march=foo+x+y+z", then instead of calling getArchExtFeature() for each of the extension names "x", "y", "z" and appending the returned string to its list of low-level subtarget features, it will call appendArchExtFeatures() which does the appending itself. The difference is that appendArchExtFeatures can add _more_ than one low-level feature name to the output feature list if it has to, and also, it gets told some information about what base architecture and CPU the extension is going to go with, which means that "+fp" can now mean something different for different CPUs. Namely, "+fp" now selects whatever the _default_ FPU is for the selected CPU and/or architecture, as defined in the ARM_ARCH or ARM_CPU_NAME macros in ARMTargetParser.def. On the clang side, I adjust DecodeARMFeatures to call the new appendArchExtFeatures function in place of getArchExtFeature. This means DecodeARMFeatures needs to be passed a CPU name and an ArchKind, which meant changing its call sites to make those available, and also sawing getLLVMArchSuffixForARM in half so that you can get an ArchKind enum value out of it instead of a string. Also, I add support here for the extension name "+fp.dp", which will automatically look through the FPU list for something that looks just like the default FPU except for also supporting double precision. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60697 llvm-svn: 362601
2019-06-05 21:12:01 +08:00
# RUN: not %clang -c -target arm-none-none-eabi -march=armv8.1-m.main+fp -o /dev/null %s 2>%t
# RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=ERROR-V81M_FP < %t %s
# RUN: not %clang -c -target arm-none-none-eabi -march=armv8.1-m.main+nofp -o /dev/null %s 2>%t
# RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=ERROR-V81M_FP < %t %s
# RUN: not %clang -c -target arm-none-none-eabi -march=armv8.1-m.main+fp.dp -o /dev/null %s 2>%t
# RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=ERROR-V81M_FPDP < %t %s
# RUN: not %clang -c -target arm-none-none-eabi -march=armv8.1-m.main+nofp.dp -o /dev/null %s 2>%t
# RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=ERROR-V81M_FPDP < %t %s
# RUN: not %clang -c -target arm-none-none-eabi -march=armv8.1-m.main+mve -o /dev/null %s 2>%t
# RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=ERROR-V81M_MVE < %t %s
[ARM] Allow "-march=foo+fp" to vary with foo Now, when clang processes an argument of the form "-march=foo+x+y+z", then instead of calling getArchExtFeature() for each of the extension names "x", "y", "z" and appending the returned string to its list of low-level subtarget features, it will call appendArchExtFeatures() which does the appending itself. The difference is that appendArchExtFeatures can add _more_ than one low-level feature name to the output feature list if it has to, and also, it gets told some information about what base architecture and CPU the extension is going to go with, which means that "+fp" can now mean something different for different CPUs. Namely, "+fp" now selects whatever the _default_ FPU is for the selected CPU and/or architecture, as defined in the ARM_ARCH or ARM_CPU_NAME macros in ARMTargetParser.def. On the clang side, I adjust DecodeARMFeatures to call the new appendArchExtFeatures function in place of getArchExtFeature. This means DecodeARMFeatures needs to be passed a CPU name and an ArchKind, which meant changing its call sites to make those available, and also sawing getLLVMArchSuffixForARM in half so that you can get an ArchKind enum value out of it instead of a string. Also, I add support here for the extension name "+fp.dp", which will automatically look through the FPU list for something that looks just like the default FPU except for also supporting double precision. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60697 llvm-svn: 362601
2019-06-05 21:12:01 +08:00
# RUN: not %clang -c -target arm-none-none-eabi -march=armv8.1-m.main+nomve -o /dev/null %s 2>%t
# RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=ERROR-V81M_MVE < %t %s
# RUN: not %clang -c -target arm-none-none-eabi -march=armv8.1-m.main+mve+fp -o /dev/null %s 2>%t
# RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=ERROR-V81M_MVE_FP < %t %s
# RUN: not %clang -c -target arm-none-none-eabi -march=armv8.1-m.main+mve.fp -o /dev/null %s 2>%t
# RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=ERROR-V81M_MVEFP < %t %s
[ARM] Allow "-march=foo+fp" to vary with foo Now, when clang processes an argument of the form "-march=foo+x+y+z", then instead of calling getArchExtFeature() for each of the extension names "x", "y", "z" and appending the returned string to its list of low-level subtarget features, it will call appendArchExtFeatures() which does the appending itself. The difference is that appendArchExtFeatures can add _more_ than one low-level feature name to the output feature list if it has to, and also, it gets told some information about what base architecture and CPU the extension is going to go with, which means that "+fp" can now mean something different for different CPUs. Namely, "+fp" now selects whatever the _default_ FPU is for the selected CPU and/or architecture, as defined in the ARM_ARCH or ARM_CPU_NAME macros in ARMTargetParser.def. On the clang side, I adjust DecodeARMFeatures to call the new appendArchExtFeatures function in place of getArchExtFeature. This means DecodeARMFeatures needs to be passed a CPU name and an ArchKind, which meant changing its call sites to make those available, and also sawing getLLVMArchSuffixForARM in half so that you can get an ArchKind enum value out of it instead of a string. Also, I add support here for the extension name "+fp.dp", which will automatically look through the FPU list for something that looks just like the default FPU except for also supporting double precision. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60697 llvm-svn: 362601
2019-06-05 21:12:01 +08:00
# RUN: not %clang -c -target arm-none-none-eabi -march=armv8.1-m.main+nomve.fp -o /dev/null %s 2>%t
# RUN: FileCheck --check-prefix=ERROR-V81M_MVEFP < %t %s
.syntax unified
.thumb
.text
csinc r0, r1, r2, eq
# ERROR-V8M: :[[@LINE-1]]:1: error
qadd r0, r1, r2
# ERROR-V8M: :[[@LINE-1]]:1: error
# ERROR-V81M: :[[@LINE-2]]:1: error
# ERROR-V81M_FP: :[[@LINE-3]]:1: error
# ERROR-V81M_FPDP: :[[@LINE-4]]:1: error
vadd.f16 s0, s1, s2
# ERROR-V8M: :[[@LINE-1]]:1: error
# ERROR-V81M: :[[@LINE-2]]:1: error
# ERROR-V81M_DSP: :[[@LINE-3]]:1: error
# ERROR-V81M_MVE: :[[@LINE-4]]:1: error
vabs.f32 s0, s1
# ERROR-V8M: :[[@LINE-1]]:1: error
# ERROR-V81M: :[[@LINE-2]]:1: error
# ERROR-V81M_DSP: :[[@LINE-3]]:1: error
# ERROR-V81M_MVE: :[[@LINE-4]]:1: error
vcmp.f64 d0,d1
# ERROR-V8M: :[[@LINE-1]]:1: error
# ERROR-V81M: :[[@LINE-2]]:1: error
# ERROR-V81M_DSP: :[[@LINE-3]]:1: error
[ARM] Allow "-march=foo+fp" to vary with foo Now, when clang processes an argument of the form "-march=foo+x+y+z", then instead of calling getArchExtFeature() for each of the extension names "x", "y", "z" and appending the returned string to its list of low-level subtarget features, it will call appendArchExtFeatures() which does the appending itself. The difference is that appendArchExtFeatures can add _more_ than one low-level feature name to the output feature list if it has to, and also, it gets told some information about what base architecture and CPU the extension is going to go with, which means that "+fp" can now mean something different for different CPUs. Namely, "+fp" now selects whatever the _default_ FPU is for the selected CPU and/or architecture, as defined in the ARM_ARCH or ARM_CPU_NAME macros in ARMTargetParser.def. On the clang side, I adjust DecodeARMFeatures to call the new appendArchExtFeatures function in place of getArchExtFeature. This means DecodeARMFeatures needs to be passed a CPU name and an ArchKind, which meant changing its call sites to make those available, and also sawing getLLVMArchSuffixForARM in half so that you can get an ArchKind enum value out of it instead of a string. Also, I add support here for the extension name "+fp.dp", which will automatically look through the FPU list for something that looks just like the default FPU except for also supporting double precision. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60697 llvm-svn: 362601
2019-06-05 21:12:01 +08:00
# ERROR-V81M_FP: :[[@LINE-4]]:1: error
# ERROR-V81M_MVE: :[[@LINE-5]]:1: error
# ERROR-V81M_MVE_FP: :[[@LINE-6]]:1: error
# ERROR-V81M_MVEFP: :[[@LINE-7]]:1: error
asrl r0, r1, r2
# ERROR-V8M: :[[@LINE-1]]:1: error
# ERROR-V81M: :[[@LINE-2]]:1: error
# ERROR-V81M_DSP: :[[@LINE-3]]:1: error
[ARM] Allow "-march=foo+fp" to vary with foo Now, when clang processes an argument of the form "-march=foo+x+y+z", then instead of calling getArchExtFeature() for each of the extension names "x", "y", "z" and appending the returned string to its list of low-level subtarget features, it will call appendArchExtFeatures() which does the appending itself. The difference is that appendArchExtFeatures can add _more_ than one low-level feature name to the output feature list if it has to, and also, it gets told some information about what base architecture and CPU the extension is going to go with, which means that "+fp" can now mean something different for different CPUs. Namely, "+fp" now selects whatever the _default_ FPU is for the selected CPU and/or architecture, as defined in the ARM_ARCH or ARM_CPU_NAME macros in ARMTargetParser.def. On the clang side, I adjust DecodeARMFeatures to call the new appendArchExtFeatures function in place of getArchExtFeature. This means DecodeARMFeatures needs to be passed a CPU name and an ArchKind, which meant changing its call sites to make those available, and also sawing getLLVMArchSuffixForARM in half so that you can get an ArchKind enum value out of it instead of a string. Also, I add support here for the extension name "+fp.dp", which will automatically look through the FPU list for something that looks just like the default FPU except for also supporting double precision. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60697 llvm-svn: 362601
2019-06-05 21:12:01 +08:00
# ERROR-V81M_FP: :[[@LINE-4]]:1: error
# ERROR-V81M_FPDP: :[[@LINE-5]]:1: error
vcadd.i8 q0, q1, q2, #90
# ERROR-V8M: :[[@LINE-1]]:1: error
# ERROR-V81M: :[[@LINE-2]]:1: error
# ERROR-V81M_DSP: :[[@LINE-3]]:1: error
[ARM] Allow "-march=foo+fp" to vary with foo Now, when clang processes an argument of the form "-march=foo+x+y+z", then instead of calling getArchExtFeature() for each of the extension names "x", "y", "z" and appending the returned string to its list of low-level subtarget features, it will call appendArchExtFeatures() which does the appending itself. The difference is that appendArchExtFeatures can add _more_ than one low-level feature name to the output feature list if it has to, and also, it gets told some information about what base architecture and CPU the extension is going to go with, which means that "+fp" can now mean something different for different CPUs. Namely, "+fp" now selects whatever the _default_ FPU is for the selected CPU and/or architecture, as defined in the ARM_ARCH or ARM_CPU_NAME macros in ARMTargetParser.def. On the clang side, I adjust DecodeARMFeatures to call the new appendArchExtFeatures function in place of getArchExtFeature. This means DecodeARMFeatures needs to be passed a CPU name and an ArchKind, which meant changing its call sites to make those available, and also sawing getLLVMArchSuffixForARM in half so that you can get an ArchKind enum value out of it instead of a string. Also, I add support here for the extension name "+fp.dp", which will automatically look through the FPU list for something that looks just like the default FPU except for also supporting double precision. Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60697 llvm-svn: 362601
2019-06-05 21:12:01 +08:00
# ERROR-V81M_FP: :[[@LINE-4]]:1: error
# ERROR-V81M_FPDP: :[[@LINE-5]]:1: error